DOCSLIB.ORG

Anne Peters Curriculum Vitae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Prof. Dr. iur. Anne Peters, LL.M. (Harvard), Director at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law Anne Peters Curriculum Vitae Personal Born on 15 November 1964 in Berlin. Married, two children. German and Swiss citizenship. Education 2000: Habilitation at the Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Germany. and Subject of the Habilitation thesis: “Elemente einer Theorie der Verfassung Degrees Europas” (Elements of a Theory of the Constitution of Europe). 1995: Master of Laws (LL.M.), Harvard Law School, Cambridge, USA. 1994: Doctorate in law, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Germany. Subject of the dissertation: “Das gebietsbezogene Referendum im Völkerrecht im Licht der Staatenpraxis nach 1989” (Territorial Referendums in Public International Law with a View to the State Practice after 1989). 1993: Second State Exam (bar qualification) (Zweite juristische Staatsprüfung, Baden-Württemberg). 1990: First State Exam (university degree) (Erste juristische Staatsprüfung, Baden-Württemberg). 1986 - 1990: Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Germany: Studies in Law, Spanish, and Modern Greek. 1985 - 1986: University of Lausanne, Switzerland: Studies in International Law. 1984 - 1985: Julius-Maximilians-University of Würzburg, Germany: Studies in Law, Modern Greek literature and language. Professional Since 2017: L. Bates Lea Global Law Professor at the Law School of the Experience University of Michigan. 2016: Visiting Professor and PKU Global Fellowship scholar at Peking University Law School. 2016: Helen L. DeRoy Distinguished Visiting Professor, University of Michigan Law School. 2015: Visiting Professor at Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris I) – Institut de recherche en droit international et européen de la Sorbonne (IREDIES). Since 25 August 2015: Professor (Honorarprofessorin) at the Freie Universität Berlin. 2014: Visiting Professor at Peking University Institute for International Law. 2014: Visiting Professor at Université Panthéon-Assas (Paris II) – Institut des hautes études internationales. Since 1st Feb. 2014: Professor (Honorarprofessorin) at the University of Heidelberg. Since 1st Sept. 2013: Professor (Titularprofessorin) for international law, public law, European Union law, comparative law at the University of Basel. Since 1st March 2013: Director at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and Public International Law, Heidelberg (full time since 1st Sept. 2013). Managing Director since 1st January 2020. 1 Prof. Dr. iur. Anne Peters, LL.M. (Harvard), Director at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law 2009: Visiting Professor at Sciences Po – L’Institut d’études politiques de Paris (IEP de Paris). 2001 - 31st Aug. 2013: Chair of Public International Law and Swiss Constitutional Law at the University of Basel, Switzerland. 1995 - 2001: Assistant Professor at the Walther-Schücking-Institute of Public International Law, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Germany. 1990 - 1994: Senior teaching and research assistant at the Chair of Public International Law and European Community Law, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Germany. 1990 - 1993: Legal traineeship (Referendariat). International legal work at the German embassy in Quito, Ecuador, and at the Max-Planck-Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law, Freiburg, Germany. Research Foundational questions in international law, especially constitutionalisation and history; international, European, and national human rights law; global governance; global animal law; European constitutional law; comparative constitutional law. Practical Legal Since 2013: Member of the Council of International Law of the German Work and Federal Foreign Office. Counselling 2011 - 2015: Member (substitute) of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) in respect of Germany. 2009: Legal expert for the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia (IIFFMCG) http://www.mpil.de/de/pub/publikationen/archiv/independent_internation al_fact.cfm. Since 2004: Vice President of the Council of the Foundation for the Basel Institute on Governance (BIG). Expertise for legal and arbitral proceedings in Switzerland and Germany. Academic Since 2019: Chairwoman of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationales associations Recht (German Society of International Law) (selection) 2017 - 2019: Member of the Board of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationales Recht (German Society of International Law) 2014 - 2015: Member of the Board of the Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer. 2010 - 2012: President of the European Society of International Law. Since 2013: Corresponding member of the Austrian Academy of Science. Since 2011: Member of the Committee on the Use of Force of the International Law Association (ILA). 2 Prof. Dr. iur. Anne Peters, LL.M. (Harvard), Director at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law Referee and Since 2017: Member of the Research Advisory Board of the Stiftung advisory activity Wissenschaft und Politik, German Institute for International and Security for journals and Affairs. publishers, Since 2013: Science Europe, Member of the Scientific Committee for the research grants Social Sciences (SOCIAL). and institutes 2010-2018: Member of the advisory board of the Berlin Social Science Center (selection). (WZB). 2012 - 2017: Member of the Research Council of the European University Institute (EUI). 2008 - 2013: Member of the National Research Council Division Humanities and Social Sciences of the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF). President of the selection committee for the book price of the International Society of Public Law (ICON-S) (2018.2019). Expert for: Union der Deutschen Akademien der Wissenschaften (Union of the German National Academies); Humboldt Foundation; Academy of Finland, Academia Sinica (Taiwan); Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research; Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften (Austrian Academy of Sciences); Österreichischer Akkreditierungsrat (Council of Accreditation Austria). Editor-in-chief: Journal of the History of International Law/Revue d’histoire du droit international. Co-editor-in-chief: Heidelberg Journal of International Law (Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht). Editorial board: European Journal of International Law (emeritus editor); Rechtswissenschaft; ius.full. Scientific Advisory Board: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (MPEPIL), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law (EiPro), Human Rights & International Legal Discourse; Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht; Friedens-Warte. Courses taught Public international law (general); international humanitarian law, international criminal law, international environmental law and animal law, international organizations; use of force; international economic law; European Union law; human rights law (domestic, European and international); comparative constitutional law; Swiss constitutional law; Swiss administrative law. Academic 2012 - 2016: Initiator and director of the Doctoral Programme “Law and administration Animals” (Law Schools of Basel and Zurich). (selection) http://ius.unibas.ch/fakultaet/projekte/life-sciences-recht/law-and- animals/. 2008 - 2013: Dean of Research of the Law School Basel. 2006 - 2012: Initiator and co-director of the Mentoring Programme “Diss Plus” (Law, Humanities, Theology), co-funded by the Federal Programme Equal Opportunity for Women and Men at Universities. 3 Prof. Dr. iur. Anne Peters, LL.M. (Harvard), Director at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law 2004 - 2013: Initiator and co-director of two new Master programmes: Trinational EUCOR-Master (Basel – Freiburg – Strasbourg) and Master Bilingue (Basel – Geneva). 2004 - 2005: Dean of the Law School Basel. Recent invited The Hague Academy Winter Course Lectures, Den Haag (2019), Hersch lectures (selection) Lauterpacht Lecture, Cambridge (2017), Peking University (Wang Tieya Lectures 2015 and 2014); Baltimore (Stead Lecture 2013); Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación, Mexico City (2013); International Law Association, Sofia (2012); Sociedad Latinoamericana para el Derecho International, Rio de Janeiro (2012); Universidade de Coimbra (2012); Asian Society of International Law, Tokyo (2012); Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (2011); Université Paris Ouest (2011); Peking University, Bejing (Wang Tieya Lecture 2011); Société française de droit international, Poitiers (2011); American Society of International Law, Washington (2011); Deutsche Gesellschaft für internationales Recht, Cologne (2011); European Society of International Law, Cambridge (2010); Deutsche Staatsrechtslehrervereinigung, Graz (2009); Societas Iuris Publici Europaei (SIPE), Budapest (2009). Languages German native; English and French excellent; Spanish very good; Italian good; Modern Greek rusty. Scholarships and Honorary Doctorate at the University of Lausanne 2020. Awards Fellow at the Bellagio Center of the Rockefeller Foundation in Bellagio, Italy 2019. Book award 2014 of the American Society of International Law (“certificate of merit in a specialized area of international law”) for the Handbook of the History of International Law (Oxford University Press 2012). Fellow at the Centre for Advanced Studies (Wissenschaftskolleg) Berlin 2012/2013. Prix Bartholdi for the development of the trinational EUCOR-Master’s programme (University of Strasbourg, France and Freiburg, Germany) 2007. Scholarships by the DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service), by the Harvard Law School and by the DFG (German Research Community). Prize of the Scientific Society at Freiburg, Germany for the best dissertation of the law school and department of economics in the period of 1993 - 1995. Doctoral scholarship by the German National Scholarship Foundation 1993- 1995. June 2020 4 .
Recommended publications
  • 8. Lo Studio Della Giurisprudenza Negli Stati Uniti

    8. Lo Studio Della Giurisprudenza Negli Stati Uniti

    8. Lo studio della Giurisprudenza negli Stati Uniti Programmi di specializzazione post-laurea (Advanced Legal Degrees) Uno degli aspetti peculiari della formazione in giurisprudenza negli States e’ che questa materia si studia solo a livellograduate. Per frequentare un corso di legge negli States uno studente deve gia’essere in possesso di un titolo di laurea di primo livello. I diplomi di laurea in giurisprudenza piu’ comuni negli States sono il Juris Doctor (JD) degree e il Master’s degree in Law(LLM). Il JD e’ il diploma che prelude all’esercizio della professione legale negli Stati Uniti e per questo e’ focalizzato soprattutto sul diritto americano (n.b. Per esercitare la professione legale negli States bisogna prima passare il bar exam e comunque essere in possesso di un visto che autorizzi il lavoro negli States).L’ LLM e’ invece un tipo di diploma che viene generalmente conseguito da chi ha gia’ una formazione legale e vuole specializzarsi in un ramo particolare del diritto come ad esempio International law, comparative law, taxation. A livello di dottorato i due diplomi piu’ importanti sono quelli di Doctor of Jiuridical Science (JSD) e di Doctor of Comparative Law Studies (DCL) che preludono per lo piu’ ad una carriera accademica in senso stretto. Riprendere dal punto: presso alcune law schools sono offerti LLM specifici per etc… Svariate università americane presso le law school conferiscono titoli di studio a livello graduate: Master of Laws (LLM) il più comune, il Master of Comparative Law (MCL), programma di specializzazione in Diritto Comparato. Solo alcune law schoolconsentono di conseguire il massimo titolo di specializzazione in giurisprudenza, il Doctor of Juridical Science (SJD).
  • From Coalition to Commons: Plan S and the Future of Scholarly Communication

    From Coalition to Commons: Plan S and the Future of Scholarly Communication

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2019 From Coalition to Commons: Plan S and the Future of Scholarly Communication Rob Johnson Research Consulting Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, Scholarly Communication Commons, and the Scholarly Publishing Commons Johnson, Rob, "From Coalition to Commons: Plan S and the Future of Scholarly Communication" (2019). Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.. 157. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/157 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Insights – 32, 2019 Plan S and the future of scholarly communication | Rob Johnson From coalition to commons: Plan S and the future of scholarly communication The announcement of Plan S in September 2018 triggered a wide-ranging debate over how best to accelerate the shift to open access. The Plan’s ten principles represent a call for the creation of an intellectual commons, to be brought into being through collective action by funders and managed through regulated market mechanisms. As it gathers both momentum and critics, the coalition must grapple with questions of equity, efficiency and sustainability. The work of Elinor Ostrom has shown that successful management of the commons frequently relies on polycentricity and adaptive governance. The Plan S principles must therefore function as an overarching framework within which local actors retain some autonomy, and should remain open to amendment as the scholarly communication landscape evolves.
  • Master of Laws

    Master of Laws

    APPLYING FOR & FINANCING YOUR LLM MASTER OF LAWS APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS APPLICATION CHECKLIST Admission to the LLM program is highly For applications to be considered, they must include the following: competitive. To be admitted to the program, ALL APPLICANTS INTERNATIONAL APPLICANTS applicants must possess the following: • Application & Application Fee – apply • Applicants with Foreign Credentials - For electronically via LLM.LSAC.ORG, and pay applicants whose native language is not • A Juris Doctor (JD) degree from an ABA-accredited non-refundable application fee of $75 English and who do not posses a degree from law school or an equivalent degree (a Bachelor of Laws • Official Transcripts: all undergraduate and a college or university whose primary language or LL.B.) from a law school outside the United States. graduate level degrees of instruction is English, current TOEFL or IELTS • Official Law School or Equivalent Transcripts scores showing sufficient proficiency in the • For non-lawyers interested in the LLM in Intellectual • For non-lawyer IP professionals: proof of English language is required. The George Mason Property (IP) Law: a Bachelor’s degree and a Master’s minimum of four years professional experience University Scalia Law School Institution code degree in another field, accompanied by a minimum in an IP-related field is 5827. of four years work experience in IP may be accepted in • 500-Word Statement of Purpose • TOEFL: Minimum of 90 in the iBT test lieu of a law degree. IP trainees and Patent Examiners • Resume (100 or above highly preferred) OR (including Bengoshi) with four or more years of • Letters of Recommendation (2 required) • IELTS: Minimum of 6.5 (7.5 or above experience in IP are welcome to apply.
  • Joint Public Health and Law Programs

    Joint Public Health and Law Programs

    JOINT PUBLIC HEALTH AND LAW tuition rate and fees are charged for semesters when no Law School courses are taken, including summer sessions. PROGRAMS Visit the Hirsh Program website (http://publichealth.gwu.edu/ Program Contact: J. Teitelbaum programs/joint-jdllm-mphcertificate/) for additional information. The Milken Institute of School of Public Health (SPH), through its Hirsh Health Law and Policy Program, cooperates with the REQUIREMENTS Law School to offer public health and law students multiple programs that foster an interdisciplinary approach to the study MPH requirements in the joint degree programs of health policy, health law, public health, and health care. The course of study for the standalone MPH degree, in one of Available joint programs include the master of public health several focus areas, (http://publichealth.gwu.edu/node/766/) (http://bulletin.gwu.edu/public-health/#graduatetext) (MPH) consists of 45 credits, including a supervised practicum. In the and juris doctor (https://www.law.gwu.edu/juris-doctor/) (JD); dual degree programs with the Law School, the Milken Institute MPH and master of laws (https://www.law.gwu.edu/master- School of Public Health (GWSPH) accepts 8 Law School credits of-laws/) (LLM); and JD or LLM and SPH certificate in various toward completion of the MPH degree. Therefore, Juris doctor subject areas. LLM students may be enrolled in either the (JD) and master of laws (LLM) students in the dual program general or environmental law program at the Law School. complete only 37 credits of coursework through GWSPH to obtain an MPH degree. Application of credits between programs Depending upon the focus area in which a JD student chooses For the JD/MPH, 8 JD credits are applied toward the MPH and to study, as a rule, the joint degree can be earned in three- up to 12 MPH credits may be applied toward the JD.
  • 9 March 2012 Biological Barriers

    9 March 2012 Biological Barriers

    th 9 International Conference and Workshop on Biological Barriers – in vitro and in silico Tools for Drug Delivery and Nanosafety Research 29 February - 9 March 2012 Saarland University21 March – 1 April 2010 Saarbrücken,Saarland Germany University Saarbrücken, Germany Programme Chairs and Organisers: Prof. Dr. Claus-Michael Lehr, Prof. Dr. Ulrich F. Schäfer, Jun. Prof. Dr. Marc Schneider, Dr. Nicole Daum http://www.uni-saarland.de/biobarriers2012 Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland 9th International Conference and Workshop on Biological Barriers – in vitro and in silico Tools for Drug Delivery and Nanosafety Research 29 February – 9 March 2012 at Saarland University, Germany Wednesday, 29 February 2012 7:30 Registration open 8:30 Relevance of in vitro studies for dermatological research Howard Maibach, University of California, USA 9:00 Welcome address Volker Linneweber, President of Saarland University Seminar 1: Skin Barrier Reaching the Immune System via the Skin: New Vaccines and Adjuvants - Challenges and Opportunities Chairs: Marc Schneider, Saarland University Steffi Hansen, Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland 9:15 Transdermal hyposensitation Thomas Kündig, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland 9:45 Vaccine delivery and the role of new adjuvants Carlos Guzman, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Germany Thomas Ebensen, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Germany 10:15 Vaccine delivery in the skin Véronique Préat, University of Leuven, Belgium 10:45 Preclinical model and clinical
  • Development of Advanced Human Intestinal in Vitro Models *** Entwicklung Von Erweiterten Humanen Intestinalen in Vitro Modellen

    Development of Advanced Human Intestinal in Vitro Models *** Entwicklung Von Erweiterten Humanen Intestinalen in Vitro Modellen

    Development of advanced human intestinal in vitro models *** Entwicklung von erweiterten humanen intestinalen in vitro Modellen Doctoral thesis for a doctoral degree at the Graduate School of Life Sciences, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Section Clinical Sciences submitted by Matthias Oliver Schweinlin from Lörrach Würzburg 2016 Submitted on: …………………………………………………………..…….. Members of the Promotionskomitee: Chairperson: Prof. Dr. Thomas Hünig Primary Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Heike Walles Supervisor (Second): Prof. Dr. Stefan Störk Supervisor (Third): PD Dr. Beate Niesler Date of Public Defence: …………………………………………….………… Date of Receipt of Certificates: ………………………………………………. Table of contents Table of contents List of figures ............................................................................................................................................. IV List of tables ............................................................................................................................................... VI Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................... VII Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... XI Zusammenfassung ................................................................................................................................ XIII 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................
  • Regulations Governing Completion Of

    Regulations Governing Completion Of

    GUIDELINES FOR COMPLETING THE MASTER OF LAWS THESIS (SPRING 2020 UPDATE) COMPLETING THE MASTER OF LAWS THESIS This document is intended to provide to GW Law students guidelines on matters relating to the Master of Laws (LL.M.) thesis. The Law School’s Bulletin identifies the thesis requirements for LL.M. candidates. The standards set out in the Bulletin govern to the extent that the matters below are inconsistent with the Bulletin. General Thesis Guidelines Full-time LL.M. students (those enrolled in 9 or more credit hours per semester) are expected to complete all degree requirements within one calendar year of matriculation. Part-time LL.M. students (those enrolled in 8 or fewer credit hours per semester) are expected to complete all degree requirements within two calendar years of matriculation. The thesis advisor has the discretion to provide written consent for an extension of the thesis deadlines up to one calendar year. The thesis must be a substantial scholarly work of a quality and length akin to a law review article. The thesis is to be written under the supervision of thesis advisor who is a full-time member of the Law School faculty or, with the approval of the program director, an adjunct member of the Law School faculty. The thesis advisor assigns the thesis grade and is the final authority regarding thesis deadlines. When a faculty member accepts a student’s request to serve as thesis advisor, the two parties should establish and agree, in writing, to a timeline of thesis deadlines based on the student’s planned graduation date.1 The general expectation is that the completed thesis will be between approximately 15,000 words and 25,000 words in length, including footnotes (approximately 60 to 100 double-spaced pages).
  • To: Faculty, Full-Time and Adjunct From: Office Of

    To: Faculty, Full-Time and Adjunct From: Office Of

    To: Faculty, Full-time and Adjunct From: Office of the Registrar Date: July 22, 2016 Re: Grading Graduate Students Introduction Over the past few years, the law school has diversified its degree offerings. In addition to the JD, the law school offers the following degrees: 1. Doctor of Juridical Science (“JSD”) 2. Master of Laws – Taxation (“Tax LLM”) 3. Master of Laws – Foreign Students (“LLM – FTA”) 4. Master of Science in Legal Studies (“MLS”) 5. Master of Taxation (“MT”) This memo will introduce you to these programs and flag some issues of which you should be aware in the event they enroll in your course. Doctor of Juridical Sciences (JSD) Students Who are they ? The JSD is equivalent to a U.S. PhD, hence these students are doctoral students. Generally, they are students who have earned their law degrees from non U.S. institutions and need the JSD to pursue an academic career in their home countries. Some have practiced law in their home countries. How will I know if a JSD student is enrolled in my course ? The Office of the Registrar (OTR) will notify you via email following the last day to drop a course without a ‘W’ (Approximately the fourth week of the semester/term). 1 Do I have to create a different assessment mechanism for them ? Faculty are not required to administer a different assessment mechanism (e.g. exam or paper) for JSD students. You may evaluate them using the same form of assessment you use for JD students. What grading rules apply to JSD students ? JSD students are not subject to the grading scale, standard deviations or means that govern the grading of JD students.
  • University of Kiel

    University of Kiel

    The CAUWelcome Graduate atCenter Kiel University Nadine Müller, M.A. Susan Brode, M.A. International Center Erasmus Incoming Officer Kiel University Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel Kiel 2 Kiel University Schleswig-Holstein ... … 2.8 mio inhabitants on 15.799 km² … biggest cities: Kiel and Lübeck … Economy: more than 90% of companies are SMEs with less than 250 employees … “Economic fields of competence”: Maritime Economy and Marine technologies Life Sciences (medicine, medical technology, biotechnology, pharmacy) Micro and Nanotechnology Food industry and technology Energy Tourism Information and Communication Technics (ICT) Kiel University Kiel – Sailing City ... … is the capital of the “Land” Schleswig-Holstein … has about 246,000 inhabitants … is a green city with numerous parks and open spaces … a lively city with a wide range of cultural attractions … is the world capital of sailing and host of the »Kieler Woche« sailing event. Kiel University Facts & Figures • Medium sized, research-focused university • 8 Faculties • 4 Research Foci • 27.000 Students • 3.500 employees • 400 Professors • 190 study programmes • No.183 in the Shanghai Ranking (ARWU) 2017 • No. 221 in Times Higher Education Ranking (THE) 2017 • among the top 15 universities in Germany Kiel University Our faculties – Faculty of Theology – Faculty of Medicine – Faculty of Arts and Humanities – Faculty of Law – Faculty of Business, Economics, and Social Sciences – Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences – Faculty of Agriculture and Nutritional Sciences
  • Manuskript 396.Pdf

    Manuskript 396.Pdf

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Kolisch, Rainer; Sprecher, Arno Working Paper — Digitized Version PSPLIB - a project scheduling problem library Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel, No. 396 Provided in Cooperation with: Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Institute of Business Administration Suggested Citation: Kolisch, Rainer; Sprecher, Arno (1996) : PSPLIB - a project scheduling problem library, Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel, No. 396, Universität Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Kiel This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/149843 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel No.
  • Are Funder Open Access Platforms a Good Idea?

    Are Funder Open Access Platforms a Good Idea?

    1 Are Funder Open Access Platforms a Good Idea? 1 2 3 2 Tony Ross-Hellauer , Birgit Schmidt , and Bianca Kramer 1 3 Know-Center, Austria, (corres. author: [email protected]) 2 4 Goettingen State and University Library, Germany 3 5 Utrecht University Library, Netherlands 6 May 23, 2018 1 PeerJ Preprints | https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26954v1 | CC BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 23 May 2018, publ: 23 May 2018 7 Abstract 8 As open access to publications continues to gather momentum we should continu- 9 ously question whether it is moving in the right direction. A novel intervention in this 10 space is the creation of open access publishing platforms commissioned by funding or- 11 ganisations. Examples include those of the Wellcome Trust and the Gates Foundation, 12 as well as recently announced initiatives from public funders like the European Commis- 13 sion and the Irish Health Research Board. As the number of such platforms increases, it 14 becomes urgently necessary to assess in which ways, for better or worse, this emergent 15 phenomenon complements or disrupts the scholarly communications landscape. This 16 article examines ethical, organisational and economic strengths and weaknesses of such 17 platforms, as well as usage and uptake to date, to scope the opportunities and threats 18 presented by funder open access platforms in the ongoing transition to open access. The 19 article is broadly supportive of the aims and current implementations of such platforms, 20 finding them a novel intervention which stand to help increase OA uptake, control costs 21 of OA, lower administrative burden on researchers, and demonstrate funders’ commit- 22 ment to fostering open practices.
  • Comparative Benchmarking of European and US Research Collaboration and Researcher Mobility

    Comparative Benchmarking of European and US Research Collaboration and Researcher Mobility

    Comparative Benchmarking of European and US Research Collaboration and Researcher Mobility A report prepared in collaboration between Science Europe and Elsevier’s SciVal Analytics September 2013 2 3 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & KEY FINDINGS 4 INTRODUCTION 6 CHAPTER 1: RESEARCH COLLABORATION IN EUROPE AND THE US 9 Introduction 10 1.1 Research collaboration patterns in Europe and the US 10 1.2 Research collaboration impact in Europe and the US 15 1.3 Research collaboration networks within Europe and the US 18 1.4 Research collaboration in detail: case studies for the Netherlands, 22 Switzerland, Czech Republic, Turkey, Albania and fyr Macedonia CHAPTER 2: RESEARCHER MOBILITY IN EUROPE AND THE US 29 Introduction 30 2.1 Researcher mobility classes in Europe and the US 30 2.2 Researcher mobility and impact in Europe and the US 34 CHAPTER 3: CONCLUSIONS 37 APPENDIX A: Country and state abbreviations 40 APPENDIX B: Methodology 43 APPENDIX C: Collaboration pairs 44 Authors 46 About 46 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Comparative Benchmarking of European and US Research Collaboration and Researcher Mobility This report focuses on the extent to which research col- Europe are likely to collaborate with researchers outside laboration and researcher mobility patterns differ between Europe. This is important as ‘outside region’ collaboration Europe and the US, based on analysis of the Scopus pub- has the greatest citation benefit – in fact the additional lication database 1. This comparison is made by exploring benefit of collaborating outside region is proportionally both the extent to which academics collaborate on research greater for European researchers than for US research- papers and the amount of researcher mobility within Europe ers.