Unseen Lives on Migration Routes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Unseen Lives on Migration Routes Unseen Lives on Migration Routes CURRENT SITUATION and NEEDS ANALYSIS Syrian Nomadic and Semi-Nomadic Communities Living in Adana, Gaziantep and Şanlıurfa Provinces and Syrian Seasonal Migrant Agricultural Workers Living in Temporary Tent Settlements on Adana Plain Unseen Lives on Migration Routes CURRENT SITUATION and NEEDS ANALYSIS Syrian Nomadic and Semi-Nomadic Communities Living in Adana, Gaziantep and Şanlıurfa Provinces and Syrian Seasonal Migrant Agricultural Workers Living in Temporary Tent Settlements on Adana Plain Syrian Nomadic and Semi-Nomadic Communities Living in Adana, Gaziantep and Şanlıurfa Provinces and Syrian Seasonal Migrant Agricultural Workers Living in Temporary Tent Settlements on Adana Plain Current Situation and Needs Analysis Prepared by Bürge Akbulut, Ertan Karabıyık, Seda Akço, Selin Ayaeş Current situation and focus group input by Ayşe Özsoy, Mustafa Divana, Özgür Çetinkaya, Selin Ayaeş Contributors: Hüseyin Gövercin, İhsan İznebioğlu, Yusuf Nural Project Manager: Ertan Karabıyık Project Manager Assistant: Selin Ayaeş Translator (Arabic-Turkish): Nesrin Rihani Translation (Turkish-English): Metin Çulhaoğlu Design and Layout: Karasin Graphic Design Printed by Altan Matbaası 750 copies, August 2020 This publication was prepared and published by Development Workshop. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Development Workshop. Çankaya Mah. Üsküp Cad. 16/14 / Çankaya - Ankara / (541) 457 31 90 www.ka.org.tr kalkinmaatolyesi [email protected] kalkinmatolyesi This publication is a public property. Quotations can be made by citing the source; the full document or a part of it can be reproduced, photocopied, copied in electronic environments and disseminated widely without permission. GOAL, an international humanitarian organization, supported the production and dissemination of this publication under LINK, a project GOAL has implemented in Turkey with funding from European Union Humanitarian Aid. GOAL or its subsidiaries are not responsible for the contents of this publication, and the information and opinions presented in this publication should not be taken to reflect or represent GOAL's views. This publication covers humanitarian aid activities implemented with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein should not be taken, in any way, to reflect the official opinion of the European Union, and the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. Funded by European Union Humanitarian Aid 3 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 12 BACKGROUND 14 OBJECTIVE, TARGET GROUP, METHODOLOGY AND LIMITATIONS 28 FINDINGS RELATED TO THE CURRENT STATE OF TARGET GROUPS 42 Places of Settlement and Mobility Status 44 Demographic Composition, Identity and Address Registration Status 48 Education 56 Health 62 Employment and Income Status 68 Living Environment and Housing Conditions 72 Safe Environment 80 Discrimination 84 Organization 90 FINDINGS RELATED TO SOCIO-ECONOMIC SUPPORT EXTENDED TO TARGET GROUPS 96 OVERALL EVALUATION 114 SUGGESTIONS 118 BIBLIOGRAPHY 128 ANNEXES 132 CONCEPTS and DEFINITIONS 182 4 Unseen Lives on Migration Routes Map 1. Roma Migration Map from India to Europe ...............................................................17 Map 2. Rom, Dom and Lom Communities Living in Turkey ....................................................22 MAPS Map 3. Distribution of Syrians under Temporary Protection in Turkey by Top Ten Provinces .....25 Map 4. Settlement Areas of Syrian Nomadic and Semi-Nomadic groups in Şanlıurfa, Gaziantep and Adana and Syrian Seasonal Migrant Agricultural Workers on Adana Plain ........................35 Figure 1. Number of Syrian Migrants in Turkey by Year ...........................................................24 Figure 2. Methods of Data and Information Collection by Target Groups ................................33 Figure 3. Current State Assessments Targeted and Realized ...................................................35 Figure 4. In-Depth Interviews Targeted and Realized ..............................................................37 Figure 5. In-Depth Interviews by District and Gender .............................................................37 Figure 6. Focus Group Interviews Targeted and Realized ........................................................38 Figure 7. District, Gender Distribution and Average Age of Focus Group Participants ..............39 Figure 8. Interviews with Institutions Targeted and Realized ..................................................40 Figure 9. Distribution of Interviews with Institutions and Actors by Province and Type of Institutions/Actors ..............................................................................................40 FIGURES Figure 10. Syrian SMAW Living in Tent Settlements on Adana Plain ........................................57 5 CHS Core Humanitarian Standard CRC UN Convention on the Rights of the Child DW Development Workshop ECHO European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations ACRONYMS ESSN Emergency Social Safety Net EU European Union TPR Temporary Protection Regulation MHC Migrant Health Centre IFRC International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies ILO International Labour Organization IPA Individual Protection Assistance LFIP Law on Foreigners and International Protection MoFLSS Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Services MoNE Ministry of National Education NGO Non-Governmental Organization SASF Social Assistance and Solidarity Foundation SED Social-Economic Assistance SES Social and Economic Support SMAW Seasonal Migrant Agricultural Workers TBB Union of Turkish Bar Associations TDHS Turkish Demographic and Health Survey TPID Temporary Protection Identity Documents UN United Nations UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund WFP World Food Programme 6 Unseen Lives on Migration Routes EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This research report aims to make visible the needs of Syrian nomadic and semi-nomadic communities that live in Adana, Gaziantep and Şanlıurfa and seasonal migrant agricultural workers who reside in temporary tent settlements in the Adana Plain, and to help facilitate these groups' access to basic services. 7 The assessment was conducted in 20 neighbourhoods and tent settlements that are home to nomadic and semi-nomadic Syrian communities in Adana, Gaziantep and Şanlıurfa provinces. To extract more detailed information about their needs, 20 in-depth interviews were conducted with this target group. Syrian seasonal migrant agricultural workers living in tent settlements on Adana Plain were the second target group of the survey. Data of 39 tent settlements obtained from the Current State and Needs Analysis related to Seasonal Migrant Agricultural Work- ers on Adana Plain, conducted by Development Workshop in November 2019 with the support of UNICEF Turkey, was used to inform the survey, alongside eight focus group discussions. To provide an overview of the services presently available to target groups and gaps existing in these services, 27 semi-structured key in- formant interviews were conducted in three provinces with institutions and actors that are directly or indirectly linked to the target groups. Findings related to the current situation of target groups obtained from the field survey are classified under nine headings: 1 Settlement sites and mobility status The target group encompasses different sub-groups with respect to their migra- tory patterns. While some reside in the same town, neighbourhood or tent settle- ment for a relatively long time, others move out and return seasonally. 2 Demographic and registration status A significant proportion of Syrian nomadic and semi-nomadic people and seasonal migrant agricultural workers in Adana, Gaziantep and Şanlıurfa have acquired temporary protection identity documents (TPID) and thus can benefit from pub- lic services. Those without temporary protection registration, on the other hand, cannot benefit from any assistance or access to services including education and health. Other obstacles in accessing public services include living outside of the province of registration and fear of being deported especially among nomadic and semi-nomadic communities even if they have temporary protection registra- tion. Address registration is another issue since TPID is not equivalent to a residence permit and the majority live in areas where properties are not fit for registration of residence (e.g. unregistered sections of real estate, shops, workshops, barracks, etc; or with more than one family living in a single household). 8 Unseen Lives on Migration Routes While there is limited demographic data for the target group population as a hole, it is estimated that at least half of this population comprises children under the age of 18, similar to the age composition of Syrians presently under temporary protection in Turkey. There are some Turkish speaking communities in the target group (i.e. Abdals), but the majority speak Arabic and/or Kurdish, giving rise to some communication difficulties in their daily lives. 3 Education Among target groups, there is no child attending preschool, and very few children of primary and secondary school age attend school. The reasons why families do not send their children to school are given as follows: Nomadic culture leaving very little space for education; long distances to schools from the places of settlement; discriminatory attitudes and
Recommended publications
  • Mitigating Risks for Syrian Refugee Youth in Turkey's Şanlıurfa
    Mitigating Risks for Syrian Refugee Youth in Turkey’s Şanlıurfa Europe Report N°253 | 11 February 2019 Headquarters International Crisis Group Avenue Louise 149 • 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 • Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Preventing War. Shaping Peace. Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Risks Facing Syrian Refugee Youth in Şanlıurfa .............................................................. 4 A. Crime and Criminal Networks ................................................................................... 4 1. A triple threat: smuggling, sexual exploitation and drugs ................................... 5 2. Criminal exploitation in the camps ...................................................................... 7 B. Jihadist and Other Militant Groups .......................................................................... 8 C. Exploitative Marriages ............................................................................................... 11 III. What Makes Youth Vulnerable ........................................................................................ 12 A. An Incomplete Register ............................................................................................. 12 B. School-related Challenges ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Great “Gypsy” Round-Up in Spain
    PROJECT EDUCATION OF ROMA | HISTORY ROMA CHILDREN COUNCIL CONSEIL OF EUROPE DE L´EUROPE IN EUROPE THE GREAT “GYPSY” 3.3 ROUND-UP IN SPAIN The Great Antonio Gómez Alfaro “Gypsy” Round-up in Spain A Preventive Security Measure l A Favourable Juncture l The Strategy l Funding the Round-up l The Prisoners’ Destination l Review of the Round-up l Problems with Freed “Gypsies” l The Reasons for the Pardon l An Unexpected Delay The Age of Enlightened Absolutism provided the authorities with increasing opportunities to apply their measures on all the citizens in their range of power. In Spain, this resulted in the most painful episode in the history of the country’s “Gypsy” community: the general round-up carried out during the reign of Ferdinand VI, on July 30, 1749. The operation, which was as thorough as it was indiscriminate, led to the internment of ten to twelve thousand people, men and women, young and old, “simply because they were Gypsies.” The co-ordination of the different public authorities involved, the co-operation of the Church, which remained passive in the face of such injustice, the excesses committed by all those who made the operation possible, and the collaboration of the prisoners’ fellow citizens and neighbours made “Black Wednesday”, as the round-up is also called, an unchallenged event in the long history of European anti-“Gypsyism”. Oviedo A S T U R I A S CANTABRIA BASQUE NUMBER OF “GYPSY” FAMILIES DOMICILED COUNTRY Following a list by the Council of Castile, probably of 1749 N A V A R R E Ill.
    [Show full text]
  • The Possible Effects of Irrigation Schemes and Irrigation Methods on Water Budget and Economy in Atatürk Dam of South-Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey
    The possible effects of irrigation schemes and irrigation methods on water budget and economy in Atatürk dam of south-eastern Anatolia region of Turkey Huseyin Demir1, Ahmet Zahir Erkan2, Nesrin Baysan2, Gonca Karaca Bilgen2 1 GAP Şanlıurfa Tünel Çıkış Ağzı 2 GAP Cankaya, Ankara, Turkey Abstract. The South-eastern Anatolia Project (GAP) has been implemented in the southeast part of Turkey, covering 9 provinces and the two most important rivers of Turkey. The main purpose of this gorgeous project is to uplift the income level and living standards of people in the region, to remove the inter-regional development disparities and to contribute to the national goals of economic development and social stability. The cost of the project is 32 billion USD consisting of 13 sub-projects in the river basins of Euphrates and Tigris. The project has evolved over time and has become multi sectoral, integrated and human based on the sustainable regional development. Upon the fully completion of the project, 1.8 Million hectares of land will be able to be irrigated in Euphrates and Tigris Basins through surface and underground water resources. From 1995 until now, 273.000 ha. of land have already been irrigated within the GAP Project. Roughly 739,000 ha. of this land will be irrigated from Atatürk Dam, the largest dam of GAP Project. At present, nearly ¼ of this area is under irrigation. Some technological developments have been experienced in the Project area, ranging from upstream controlled schemes having trapezoidal section, lined or unlined, to upstream controlled schemes having high pressurized piped system; and from conventional methods to drip irrigation method.
    [Show full text]
  • A Spatial Analysis of Gaziantep Railway and Its Station Throughout History
    https://doi.org/10.3311/PPar.15799 196|Creative Commons Attribution b Periodica Polytechnica Architecture, 51(2), pp. 196–208, 2020 A Spatial Analysis of Gaziantep Railway and Its Station Throughout History 1 2* 3 Hilal Aycı , Derya Güleç Özer , Abdulkadir Güleç 1 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Gazi University, 06570 Ankara, 5 Yükseliş Street, Turkey 2 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul Technical University, 34367 Şişli, Istanbul, 2 Taşkışla Road, Turkey 3 Department of Construction, Technical Sciences Vocational School, Sütçü İmam University, 46050 Onikişubat, Kahramanmaraş, 251/A Batı Çevreyolu Boulevard, Turkey * Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Received: 24 February 2020, Accepted: 03 August 2020, Published online: 07 September 2020 Abstract The invention and proliferation of railways around the world emerged from the need for transport networks that would facilitate the movement of industrial goods produced during the Industrial Revolution. They were introduced to the Anatolian region in the late– Ottoman period and gained importance as an indispensable part of the internal market in a new nation-state, the Republic of Turkey. Thanks to its location on the Silk Road, Gaziantep city in the southeastern part of Turkey, has always been a particularly important node on commercial routes. The present study describes the introduction of railways to Gaziantep province and the effects of Gaziantep Railway Station on the city at an urban and structural scale. Although the first city plan was the Barsumyan–Nazaryan Plan (1920s), the railway system was introduced as a design object to Gaziantep City in the Jansen Plan (1938) and followed by the Aru–Söylemezoğlu Plan (1950), Gaziantep Plan (1973), and Oğuz Aldan Plan (1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Invest in Gaziantep Invest in Gaziantep Invest in Gaziantep Invest in Gaziantep
    INVEST IN GAZIANTEP INVEST IN GAZIANTEP INVEST IN GAZIANTEP INVEST IN GAZIANTEP DEVELOPED INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE LIFESTYLE AND EXPORT POTENTIAL 04 S 14 GEOGRAPHICAL CULTURE, TOURISM INDICATONS AND LIFESTYLE 06 T 18 of GAZIANTEP GOVERNMENT INCENTIVES GAZIANTEP CUISINE 08 N 21 EDUCATION 10 23 INDUSTRY TE ORGANISED AGRICULTURE 11 26 INDUSTRIAL ZONES N TOURISM FOREIGN TRADE 12 O 28 VISION PROJECTS HEALT 13 C 30 INVEST IN GAZIANTEP DEVELOPED INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND EXPORT POTENTIAL Industries in Gaziantep are mainly located in over 5 or- ganized industrial zones (OIZ) and one Free Industrial Zone (FIZ) developed throughout the region. There are more than 5 organized industrial zones(OIZs) and and one Free Industrial Zone (FIZ) where most of Industries in Gaziantep are mainly lo- The city is also a good cated. Gaziantep OIZs host more than 900 big sized companies and SMEs in these industrial zones. In ad- place in terms of its dition to OIZs, small industrial sites consist an impor- export share in Turkey. tant portion of city’s economy. More than 4000 small Gaziantep’s export sized companies support the industrial manufacturing in terms of providing semi-finished goods and techni- reached nearly 6.5 cal support. Specialized parks have been developed in billion Dollars in 2017. Gaziantep to provide to the needs of specific industries. The city is also a good place in terms of its share of export in Turkey. Ga- ziantep’s export reached nearly 6.5 billion Dollars in 2017. 4 ika.org.tr INVEST IN GAZIANTEP LOCATIONLOCATION Only 2 hours distribution range by plane to all major cities in North Africa and Middle East cities and reaching more than 450 million people.
    [Show full text]
  • Adana Hiltonsa Offers 15 Years’ Tradition and High Service Quality
    A DA N A HILTONSA A HOTEL WITH A HISTORY, THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL 5 STAR HOTEL IN ADANA Adana HiltonSA offers 15 years’ tradition and high service quality. ADANA HILTONSA OFFERS, 16 YEARS’ TRADITION AND HIGH QUALITY SERVICE Adana HiltonSA offers 15 years’ tradition and high service quality. ADANA HILTONSA FEATURES Adana HiltonSA situated on the banks of Seyhan River, overlooking the Roman Stone Bridge and the old city 10 minutes walking distance to Sabanci Mosque & Old Town Easy access to shopping mall and famous shopping district Ziyapasa 15 minutes from Adana Sakirpasa International Airport ADANA HILTONSA ADANA HILTONSA FEATURES Airport transfer Free Wi-Fi Hilton Honors Privileges Hairdresser and Barber, Jewellery & Watch, Souvenir, Tobacco Shop Bank & ATM Small Pets allowed 24 hour Room Service ADANA HILTONSA ADANA HILTONSA THE LOBBY ADANA HILTONSA ALL ROOMS WITH SEYHAN RIVER VIEW OR CITY VIEW 500295 large large rooms&suitesrooms & suites with balconies Unforgettable Bosphorus, garden or city views. 130 rooms with stunning Seyhan River view and overlooking to Roman Stone Bridge & ParkSabanci floor Mosque rooms with private terraces Family rooms Comfortable king or twin beds Large king or twin beds MarbleFamily bathrooms& accessible rooms Bottled complimentary water in rooms Luxury «Peter-Thomas-Roth» bathroom amenities ADANA HILTONSA STANDART BEDROOMS Select from: 127 King Rooms with Seyhan River view or city view 47 Twin Rooms with Seyhan River view or city view Features: Wi-Fi access In room dining Coffee set up Working station and ergonomic chair Iron & ironing board Laundry, hairdryer and in-room safe ADANA HILTONSA SUITE ROOMS Features: In Addition to Standart Room offers; Seperate living room with 37’’ HD sat TV Executive Lounge access with breakfast and refreshments Kitchenette 500 Panaromic large rooms&suites Seyhan River viewwith balconies Unforgettable Bosphorus, garden or city views.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics of Multilingualism in Roma Education in Early Soviet Union and Its Current Projections Marushiakova, Elena; Popov, Vesselin
    www.ssoar.info Politics of multilingualism in Roma education in early Soviet Union and its current projections Marushiakova, Elena; Popov, Vesselin Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Marushiakova, E., & Popov, V. (2017). Politics of multilingualism in Roma education in early Soviet Union and its current projections. Social Inclusion, 5(4), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v5i4.1128 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de Social Inclusion (ISSN: 2183–2803) 2017, Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 48–59 DOI: 10.17645/si.v5i4.1128 Article Politics of Multilingualism in Roma Education in Early Soviet Union and Its Current Projections Elena Marushiakova * and Vesselin Popov School of History, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, KY16 9BA, UK; E-Mails: [email protected] (E.M.), [email protected] (V.P.) * Corresponding author Submitted: 14 August 2017 | Accepted: 16 October 2017 | Published: 22 December 2017 Abstract This article presents the history of the politics of multilingualism (or lack thereof) in regard to Roma (formerly known as ‘Gypsies’). In the 1920s and 1930s in the newly established Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, against a backdrop of pro- claimed principles of full equality of all peoples1 living in the new state, commenced a rapid creation of schools for Roma children with instruction in Romani mother-tongue along with special training of Roma teachers.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting the Social Inclusion of Roma
    EU NETWORK OF INDEPENDENT EXPERTS ON SOCIAL INCLUSION PROMOTING THE SOCIAL INCLUSION OF ROMA HUGH FRAZER AND ERIC MARLIER (NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND MAYNOOTH, CEPS/INSTEAD) DECEMBER 2011 SYNTHESIS REPORT On behalf of the Disclaimer: This report reflects the views of its authors European Commission and these are not necessarily those of either the DG Employment, Social Affairs European Commission or the Member States. and Inclusion The original language of the report is English. EU NETWORK OF INDEPENDENT EXPERTS ON SOCIAL INCLUSION PROMOTING THE SOCIAL INCLUSION OF ROMA HUGH FRAZER AND ERIC MARLIER (NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND MAYNOOTH, CEPS/INSTEAD) DECEMBER 2011 SYNTHESIS REPORT Overview based on the national reports prepared by the EU Network of Independent Experts on Social Inclusion Disclaimer: This report reflects the views of its authors and these are not necessarily those of either the European Commission or the Member States. The original language of the report is English. On behalf of the European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion SYNTHESIS REPORT Contents Preface 3 Summary, conclusions and suggestions 4 A. Summary 4 A.1 Overview of the situation of the Roma in the European Union (EU) 4 A.2 Assessment of existing policy and governance frameworks and identification of key policy priorities to be addressed in national Roma integration strategies 6 B. Conclusions and suggestions 12 1. Overview of the Situation of the Roma in the EU 16 1.1 Roma population across the EU 16 1.2 Geographical variations within countries 20 1.3 Poverty and social exclusion of Roma 22 1.3.1 Income poverty and deprivation 23 1.3.2 Educational disadvantage 24 1.3.3 Employment disadvantage 27 1.3.4 Poor health 30 1.3.5 Inadequate housing and environment 32 1.3.6 Limited access to sport, recreation and culture 34 1.4 Widespread discrimination and racism 35 1.5 Gender discrimination 38 1.6 Extensive data gaps 39 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek
    ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ Alpaslan SALTAN ADANA İLİ ALADAĞ İLÇESİ KÖKEZ KÖYÜNÜN SOSYO-EKONOMİK YAPISI VE KALKINMA AÇISINDAN TARIMSAL YAYIM ÇALIŞMALARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ TARIM EKONOMİSİ ANABİLİM DALI ADANA,2006 ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ ADANA İLİ ALADAĞ İLÇESİ KÖKEZ KÖYÜNÜN SOSYO-EKONOMİK YAPISI VE KALKINMA AÇISINDAN TARIMSAL YAYIM ÇALIŞMALARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ Alpaslan SALTAN YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ TARIM EKONOMİSİ ANABİLİM DALI Bu tez / / 2006 Tarihinde Aşağıdaki Jüri Üyeleri Tarafından Oy Birliği/Oy Çokluğu İle Kabul Edilmiştir. İmza :……………………. İmza :……………….... İmza :……….……… Prof. Dr. Faruk EMEKSİZ Prof. Dr. Onur ERKAN Prof. Dr. Veyis TANSI DANIŞMAN ÜYE ÜYE Bu Tez Enstitümüz Tarım Ekonomisi Anabilim Dalında Hazırlanmıştır. Kod No : Prof. Dr. Aziz ERTUNÇ Enstitü Müdürü İmza ve Mühür Bu Çalışma Çukurova Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi Tarafından Desteklenmiştir. Proje No: ZF2005YL6 Not : Bu tezde kullanılan özgün ve başka kaynaklardan yapılan bildirişlerin, çizelge, şekil ve fotoğrafların kaynak gösterilmeden kullanımı, 5846 sayılı Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunundaki hükümlere tabidir. ÖZ YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ ADANA İLİ ALADAĞ İLÇESİ KÖKEZ KÖYÜNÜN SOSYO-EKONOMİK YAPISI VE KALKINMA AÇISINDAN TARIMSAL YAYIM ÇALIŞMALARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ Alpaslan SALTAN ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ TARIM EKONOMİSİ ANABİLİM DALI Danışman : Prof. Dr. Faruk EMEKSİZ Yıl:2006, Sayfa:72 Jüri : Prof. Dr. Faruk EMEKSİZ Prof. Dr. Onur ERKAN Prof. Dr. Veyis TANSI Araştırma Adana İli Aladağ İlçesi Kökez köyünde yürütülmüştür. Kökez 1.081 nüfuslu, ilçeye 14 km uzaklıkta bir dağ köyüdür. Bu çalışmada, köyün yerleşme düzeni, nüfusu, toplumsal yapısı, ekonomik yapısı, altyapı ve kamusal hizmetleri, tarımsal yayım hizmetleri incelenmiştir. Aynı zamanda çalışmada, 1.000 Köye 1.000 Tarımcı Projesi kapsamında çalışan personelin yürüttüğü tarımsal yayım faaliyetleri ve köyün kalkınması konusunda olası etkileri araştırılmıştır.
    [Show full text]
  • Şanlıurfa İlinde Süt Sığırcılığı Yapan İşletmelerin Yapısı Sorun Ve Çözüm
    Atmak A. ve Yazgan K / DUFED 7(3) (2018) 116-125 Dicle Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi dergi anasayfa: http://www.dufed.org Şanlıurfa İlinde Süt Sığırcılığı Yapan İşletmelerin Yapısı Sorun ve Çözüm Önerileri* Problems and solution proposals related to structure of dairy cattle farms placed in Sanliurfa province Adalet Atmak1, Kemal Yazgan2 1 Şanlıurfa İli Damızlık Sığır Yetiştiricileri Birliği 2 Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Zootekni Bölümü Şanlıurfa M A K A L E B İ L G İ S İ Ö Z E T Geliş Tarihi: 23.05.2018 Bu çalışmada, Şanlıurfa ili Damızlık Sığır Yetiştiricileri Birliğine kayıtlı süt sığırcılığı yapan Revizyon Tarihi: 02.09.2018 işletmeler ile Gıda, Tarım ve Hayvancılık İl Müdürlüğünde 2006-2016 yılları arasında tutulan Kabul Tarihi: 29.10.2018 kayıtlardan yararlanılmıştır. Çalışmada Şanlıurfa’da süt sığırcılığı yapan işletmelerin genel Elektronik Yayın Tarihi: 31.12.2018 Basım: 15.01.2019 yapısı, hayvan varlığı, işletme sayıları, ırk bazında hayvan sayıları, desteklemeler, yapay tohumlama verileri, aylık ve günlük süt ortalamaları gibi parametreler üzerinde durulmuş buna bağlı sorun ve çözüm yollarının ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda Şanlıurfa ili bütünüyle ele alındığında 5 ila 20 baş hayvan barındıran işletmelerin tüm işletmeler içindeki payının % 75.6 olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Süt üretimine il genelinde en çok Siyah Alaca, Siyah Alaca melezi, Simental ve Simental melezleri ırklarının kullanıldığı görülmüştür. Yerli ırkların süt veriminin kültür ırkı ve melezlerden çok daha düşük olduğu belirlenmiştir. Hayvan varlığı bakımından toplam hayvan sayısının diğer ilçelere oranla Viranşehir ilçesinde daha fazla olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bununla birlikte Şanlıurfa DSYB’ye kayıtlı işletmelerin süt verimi ortalamalarında 2015- 2016 yılları arasında azalmalar görülmüştür.
    [Show full text]
  • Adana Ulu Camii
    Adana Ulu Camii A.Osman UYSAL SBi ünümüzde artık iyice gelişerek o|gunlaş- deleşme eğilimi ve mermer kaplamaların kullanıl- maya başlayan Anadolu Türk Mimarisi ması(2) . v.b. gibi yeniliklerin; "daha çok, Ana­ anştvmahrında; Türklerin doğudan getirdikleri dolu'nun batı bölgelerinde hüküm sürmüş olan mimarf' bbiklmler, Anadolu'ya geklikten sonra Saruhan (1300-1410), Aydm (1300-1403), Men­ Bizans, Ermeni, güneydeki islâm sanat çevrele­ teşe (1300-1425), Germiyan (1300-1428) ve Os- rinden aMikları biçim ve süsleme öğelerinin neler manoğullaıı'nın kurmuş oldukları cami ve med­ oidukhn aşağı-yukan tamamen bilinmekte ve reselerde gerçekleşmiş görürüz."(3) çevre kültürlerden gelen bu unsuriarın, Anadolu'ya ulaşırken geçtiği yollar; tarihi bilinen somut ör­ Adana ve çevresinde 1353'den 1608'e kadar hüküm süren ve çoğunlukla Memluklere tâbi ola­ neklerle ortaya konulmaya çalışılmaktadır. Bu rak yaşayan Ramazanoğulları ile, Maraş-Elbistan arada, eMeki verilerin yeterszliği nedeniyle tam civarında, 1339'da Memlûklerin onayıyla beylik açricianamayan; fakat, ister mimari' biçimlenişte, kuran Dulgadıroğullan'nm (1339-1521 )(•») mi- ister ddcorasyonda olsun hissedilen etkileşimle­ mârîlerinde ise; Selçuklu Sanatı'ndan ziyâde, Su­ rin; somut ömdcIer verilmeden ve sağlam mesnet- riye ve Mısır etkilerinin ağır bastığı bilinen bir lere dayandrıbnadan etki kaynağı olan bölgenin gerçektir. Yalnız, hiç bir zaman gözden ırak tu­ sadece ismi verilerek geçiştirikiiğine de şahit olu­ tulmaması gereken önemli bir nokta var ki; o da, yoruz. Türk Sanatı Tarihi araştırmalarmda zaman bu etkilerin biçimsel olmaktan çok, dekoratif ka­ zaman karşıtaştiğımız bu tür yuvarlak ifadeler, rakterli oluşlarıdır. SzelEkle; henüz herşeyiyle incelenmemiş olan "Beyfikler Devri Sanatı" söz konusu edildiğinde Fakat "Suriye ve Mısır patentli" unsurların karşınıza çıkmaktadr. Anadolu'ya ilk girişler, 14 yy.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Interagency Health-Needs-Assessment Mission
    United Nations interagency health-needs-assessment mission Southern Turkey, 4−5 December 2012 IOM • OIM Joint Mission of WHO, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF and IOM 1 United Nations interagency health-needs-assessment mission Southern Turkey, 4−5 December 2012 Joint Mission of WHO, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF and IOM Abstract On 4–5 December 2012, a United Nations interagency health-needs-assessment mission was conducted in four of the 14 Syrian refugee camps in southern Turkey: two in the Gaziantep province (İslahiye and Nizip camps), and one each in the provinces of Kahramanmaraş (Central camp) and Osmaniye (Cevdetiye camp). The mission, which was organized jointly with the World Health Organization (WHO), the Ministry of Health of Turkey and the Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency of the Prime Ministry of Turkey (AFAD), the United Nations Populations Fund (UNFPA), the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for refugees (UNHCR) and comprised representatives of the International Organization for Migration (IOM). It was coordinated by WHO. The primary goals of the mission were: to gain a better understanding of the capacities existing in the camps, including the health services provided, and the functioning of the referral system; and, on the basis of the findings, identify how the United Nations agencies could contribute to supporting activities related to safeguarding the health of the more than 138 000 Syrian citizens living in Turkey at the time of the mission. The mission team found that the high-level Turkish health-care services were accessible to and free of charge for all Syrian refugees, independent of whether they were living in or outside the camps.
    [Show full text]