Identification of Unknown Epigenetically Regulated Genes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Identification of Unknown Epigenetically Regulated Genes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer” DIPLOMARBEIT Titel der Diplomarbeit “Identification of unknown epigenetically regulated genes in non-small cell lung cancer” Durchgeführt an der Medizinischen Universität Wien Univ. Klinik für Innere Med. I/Klinische Abteilung für Onkologie Verfasserin Valerie Nadine Babinsky angestrebter akademischer Grad Magistra der Naturwissenschaften (Mag.rer.nat.) Wien, 2011 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 441 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Mikrobiologie und Genetik Betreuer: Ao.Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Mikulits Table of Content 1 TABLE OF CONTENT 1 Table of Content ............................................................................................................ 2 2 Acknowledgment / Danksagung ..................................................................................... 5 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 6 4 Aim of study .................................................................................................................. 7 5 Background .................................................................................................................... 9 5.1 Epigenetics: Histone protein modifications and DNA methylation ......................................... 9 5.1.1 Histone protein modifications ............................................................................................... 10 5.1.2 DNA methylation ................................................................................................................... 11 5.1.2.1 CpG islands ............................................................................................................................. 12 5.1.2.2 CpG methylation .................................................................................................................... 13 5.1.2.3 DNA methyltransferases ........................................................................................................ 14 5.2 Effects of DNA methylation on gene transcription ................................................................ 16 5.3 Epigenetic changes are reversible ......................................................................................... 18 5.4 Lung cancer ............................................................................................................................ 21 5.4.1 DNA methylation as molecular biomarker in NSCLC ............................................................. 23 5.5 DNA methylation analyses ..................................................................................................... 23 5.5.1 Sodium bisulfite treatment .................................................................................................... 23 5.5.2 PCR based techniques for analyzing DNA methylation ......................................................... 24 5.5.3 DNA methylation analysis on a whole genome level ............................................................. 26 5.6 DNA methylation and its impact on NSCLC ........................................................................... 27 6 Material and Methods.................................................................................................. 31 6.1 Cell culture ............................................................................................................................. 31 6.1.1 Cell passaging ......................................................................................................................... 31 6.1.2 Cell freezing............................................................................................................................ 32 6.1.3 Cell de-freezing ...................................................................................................................... 32 6.1.4 Incubation of cells with 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine .................................................................... 32 6.2 Nucleic acid isolation ............................................................................................................. 33 6.2.1 Isolation of genomic DNA ...................................................................................................... 33 6.2.2 Isolation of total RNA ............................................................................................................. 34 6.2.3 RNAse treatment of extracted DNA ....................................................................................... 35 6.3 Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) ............................................................................................ 35 2 Valerie Babinsky 0405551 Table of Content 6.3.1 Sodium bisulfite treatment .................................................................................................... 35 6.3.2 SssI CpG-methyltransferase treatment of genomic DNA ...................................................... 35 6.3.3 Primer design ......................................................................................................................... 36 6.3.4 MSP analysis........................................................................................................................... 39 6.4 Expression microarray analysis .............................................................................................. 40 6.4.1 RNA clean-up with the MinElute Kit (Qiagen) ....................................................................... 40 6.4.2 Double strand cDNA synthesis ............................................................................................... 40 6.4.3 Double strand cDNA clean-up ................................................................................................ 41 6.4.4 In vitro transcription .............................................................................................................. 41 6.4.5 cRNA clean-up ........................................................................................................................ 42 6.4.6 cRNA fragmentation .............................................................................................................. 42 6.4.7 Microarray preparation and hybridization ............................................................................ 43 6.4.8 Washing and scanning of microarrays ................................................................................... 43 6.5 Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP)-chip analysis ............................................. 45 6.5.1 Fragmentation of genomic DNA ............................................................................................ 45 6.5.2 Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) ................................................................... 45 6.5.3 Whole genome amplification (WGA) ..................................................................................... 47 6.5.3.1 Step 1 of WGA ........................................................................................................................ 47 6.5.3.2 Step 2 of WGA ........................................................................................................................ 48 6.5.4 Clean-up of amplified DNA .................................................................................................... 48 6.5.5 Test for enrichment efficiency by quantitative real-time PCR .............................................. 49 6.5.6 MeDIP-chip analysis ............................................................................................................... 50 6.5.7 Statistical analysis of microarray data ................................................................................... 51 6.6 Buffer ingredients .................................................................................................................. 53 7 Results ......................................................................................................................... 54 7.1 Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of NSCLC cell lines ................................................ 54 7.1.1 Gene expression analysis of the NSCLC cell lines A549, NCI-H1993 and NCI-H2073 before and after treatment with Aza-dC and/or TSA ........................................................................ 54 7.1.1.1 Aza-dC induced genes ............................................................................................................ 55 7.1.1.2 TSA induced genes ................................................................................................................. 56 7.1.1.3 TSA and Aza-dC treated cells ................................................................................................. 58 7.1.1.4 Identification of cancer-associated genes ............................................................................. 63 3 Valerie Babinsky 0405551 Table of Content 7.1.1.5 Single gene DNA methylation analysis of selected genes in tissue samples of NSCLC patients (n=10) ..................................................................................................................................... 64 7.1.2 Establishing MeDIP-chip ........................................................................................................ 65 7.1.2.1 MeDIP-chip analysis ............................................................................................................... 72 7.1.2.2 Functional analysis of tumor-specifically methylated genes ................................................
Recommended publications
  • Entrez Symbols Name Termid Termdesc 117553 Uba3,Ube1c
    Entrez Symbols Name TermID TermDesc 117553 Uba3,Ube1c ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme 3 GO:0016881 acid-amino acid ligase activity 299002 G2e3,RGD1310263 G2/M-phase specific E3 ubiquitin ligase GO:0016881 acid-amino acid ligase activity 303614 RGD1310067,Smurf2 SMAD specific E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 2 GO:0016881 acid-amino acid ligase activity 308669 Herc2 hect domain and RLD 2 GO:0016881 acid-amino acid ligase activity 309331 Uhrf2 ubiquitin-like with PHD and ring finger domains 2 GO:0016881 acid-amino acid ligase activity 316395 Hecw2 HECT, C2 and WW domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 2 GO:0016881 acid-amino acid ligase activity 361866 Hace1 HECT domain and ankyrin repeat containing, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 GO:0016881 acid-amino acid ligase activity 117029 Ccr5,Ckr5,Cmkbr5 chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5 GO:0003779 actin binding 117538 Waspip,Wip,Wipf1 WAS/WASL interacting protein family, member 1 GO:0003779 actin binding 117557 TM30nm,Tpm3,Tpm5 tropomyosin 3, gamma GO:0003779 actin binding 24779 MGC93554,Slc4a1 solute carrier family 4 (anion exchanger), member 1 GO:0003779 actin binding 24851 Alpha-tm,Tma2,Tmsa,Tpm1 tropomyosin 1, alpha GO:0003779 actin binding 25132 Myo5b,Myr6 myosin Vb GO:0003779 actin binding 25152 Map1a,Mtap1a microtubule-associated protein 1A GO:0003779 actin binding 25230 Add3 adducin 3 (gamma) GO:0003779 actin binding 25386 AQP-2,Aqp2,MGC156502,aquaporin-2aquaporin 2 (collecting duct) GO:0003779 actin binding 25484 MYR5,Myo1e,Myr3 myosin IE GO:0003779 actin binding 25576 14-3-3e1,MGC93547,Ywhah
    [Show full text]
  • University of Leicester, Msc Medical Statistics, Thesis, Wilmar
    Thesis MSc in Medical Statistics Department of Health Sciences University of Leicester, United Kingdom Application of Bayesian hierarchical generalized linear models using weakly informative prior distributions to identify rare genetic variant effects on blood pressure Wilmar Igl March 2015 Summary Background Currently rare genetic variants are discussed as a source of \missing heritability" of complex traits. Bayesian hierarchical models were proposed as an efficient method for the estimation and aggregation of conditional effects of rare variants. Here, such models are applied to identify rare variant effects on blood pressure. Methods Empirical data provided by the Genetic Analysis Workshop 19 (2014) included 1,851 Mexican-American individuals with diastolic blood pressure (DBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), hypertension (HTN) and 461,868 variants from whole- exome sequencing of odd-numbered chromosomes. Bayesian hierarchical generalized linear models using weakly informative prior distributions were applied. Results Associations of rare variants chr1:204214013 (estimate = 39.6, Credible In- terval (CrI) 95% = [25.3, 53.9], Bayesian p = 6:8 × 10−8) in the PLEKHA6 gene and chr11:118518698 (estimate = 32.2, CrI95% = [20.6, 43.9], Bayesian p = 7:0 × 10−8) in the PHLEDB1 gene were identified. Joint effects of grouped rare variants on DBP in 23 genes (Bayesian p = [8:8 × 10−14, 9:3 × 10−8]) and on SBP in 21 genes (Bayesian p = [8:6 × 10−12, 7:8 × 10−8]) in pathways related to hemostasis, sodi- um/calcium transport, ciliary activity, and others were found. No association with hypertension was detected. Conclusions Bayesian hierarchical generalized linear models with weakly informa- tive priors can successfully be applied in exome-wide genetic association analyses of rare variants.
    [Show full text]
  • Download The
    PROBING THE INTERACTION OF ASPERGILLUS FUMIGATUS CONIDIA AND HUMAN AIRWAY EPITHELIAL CELLS BY TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROFILING IN BOTH SPECIES by POL GOMEZ B.Sc., The University of British Columbia, 2002 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Experimental Medicine) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) January 2010 © Pol Gomez, 2010 ABSTRACT The cells of the airway epithelium play critical roles in host defense to inhaled irritants, and in asthma pathogenesis. These cells are constantly exposed to environmental factors, including the conidia of the ubiquitous mould Aspergillus fumigatus, which are small enough to reach the alveoli. A. fumigatus is associated with a spectrum of diseases ranging from asthma and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis to aspergilloma and invasive aspergillosis. Airway epithelial cells have been shown to internalize A. fumigatus conidia in vitro, but the implications of this process for pathogenesis remain unclear. We have developed a cell culture model for this interaction using the human bronchial epithelium cell line 16HBE and a transgenic A. fumigatus strain expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP). Immunofluorescent staining and nystatin protection assays indicated that cells internalized upwards of 50% of bound conidia. Using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), cells directly interacting with conidia and cells not associated with any conidia were sorted into separate samples, with an overall accuracy of 75%. Genome-wide transcriptional profiling using microarrays revealed significant responses of 16HBE cells and conidia to each other. Significant changes in gene expression were identified between cells and conidia incubated alone versus together, as well as between GFP positive and negative sorted cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table 1: Adhesion Genes Data Set
    Supplementary Table 1: Adhesion genes data set PROBE Entrez Gene ID Celera Gene ID Gene_Symbol Gene_Name 160832 1 hCG201364.3 A1BG alpha-1-B glycoprotein 223658 1 hCG201364.3 A1BG alpha-1-B glycoprotein 212988 102 hCG40040.3 ADAM10 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 10 133411 4185 hCG28232.2 ADAM11 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 11 110695 8038 hCG40937.4 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 (meltrin alpha) 195222 8038 hCG40937.4 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 (meltrin alpha) 165344 8751 hCG20021.3 ADAM15 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 15 (metargidin) 189065 6868 null ADAM17 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17 (tumor necrosis factor, alpha, converting enzyme) 108119 8728 hCG15398.4 ADAM19 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 19 (meltrin beta) 117763 8748 hCG20675.3 ADAM20 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 20 126448 8747 hCG1785634.2 ADAM21 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 21 208981 8747 hCG1785634.2|hCG2042897 ADAM21 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 21 180903 53616 hCG17212.4 ADAM22 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 22 177272 8745 hCG1811623.1 ADAM23 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 23 102384 10863 hCG1818505.1 ADAM28 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 28 119968 11086 hCG1786734.2 ADAM29 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 29 205542 11085 hCG1997196.1 ADAM30 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 30 148417 80332 hCG39255.4 ADAM33 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 33 140492 8756 hCG1789002.2 ADAM7 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 7 122603 101 hCG1816947.1 ADAM8 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 8 183965 8754 hCG1996391 ADAM9 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 9 (meltrin gamma) 129974 27299 hCG15447.3 ADAMDEC1 ADAM-like,
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S4. FGA Co-Expressed Gene List in LUAD
    Supplementary Table S4. FGA co-expressed gene list in LUAD tumors Symbol R Locus Description FGG 0.919 4q28 fibrinogen gamma chain FGL1 0.635 8p22 fibrinogen-like 1 SLC7A2 0.536 8p22 solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 2 DUSP4 0.521 8p12-p11 dual specificity phosphatase 4 HAL 0.51 12q22-q24.1histidine ammonia-lyase PDE4D 0.499 5q12 phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific FURIN 0.497 15q26.1 furin (paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme) CPS1 0.49 2q35 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial TESC 0.478 12q24.22 tescalcin INHA 0.465 2q35 inhibin, alpha S100P 0.461 4p16 S100 calcium binding protein P VPS37A 0.447 8p22 vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) SLC16A14 0.447 2q36.3 solute carrier family 16, member 14 PPARGC1A 0.443 4p15.1 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha SIK1 0.435 21q22.3 salt-inducible kinase 1 IRS2 0.434 13q34 insulin receptor substrate 2 RND1 0.433 12q12 Rho family GTPase 1 HGD 0.433 3q13.33 homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase PTP4A1 0.432 6q12 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 C8orf4 0.428 8p11.2 chromosome 8 open reading frame 4 DDC 0.427 7p12.2 dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) TACC2 0.427 10q26 transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 MUC13 0.422 3q21.2 mucin 13, cell surface associated C5 0.412 9q33-q34 complement component 5 NR4A2 0.412 2q22-q23 nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 EYS 0.411 6q12 eyes shut homolog (Drosophila) GPX2 0.406 14q24.1 glutathione peroxidase
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Microrna Database Mining in Biomarker Discovery and Identification of Therapeutic Targets for Complex Disease
    Article Application of microRNA Database Mining in Biomarker Discovery and Identification of Therapeutic Targets for Complex Disease Jennifer L. Major, Rushita A. Bagchi * and Julie Pires da Silva * Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (R.A.B.); [email protected] (J.P.d.S.) Supplementary Tables Methods Protoc. 2021, 4, 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps4010005 www.mdpi.com/journal/mps Methods Protoc. 2021, 4, 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps4010005 2 of 25 Table 1. List of all hsa-miRs identified by Human microRNA Disease Database (HMDD; v3.2) analysis. hsa-miRs were identified using the term “genetics” and “circulating” as input in HMDD. Targets CAD hsa-miR-1 Targets IR injury hsa-miR-423 Targets Obesity hsa-miR-499 hsa-miR-146a Circulating Obesity Genetics CAD hsa-miR-423 hsa-miR-146a Circulating CAD hsa-miR-149 hsa-miR-499 Circulating IR Injury hsa-miR-146a Circulating Obesity hsa-miR-122 Genetics Stroke Circulating CAD hsa-miR-122 Circulating Stroke hsa-miR-122 Genetics Obesity Circulating Stroke hsa-miR-26b hsa-miR-17 hsa-miR-223 Targets CAD hsa-miR-340 hsa-miR-34a hsa-miR-92a hsa-miR-126 Circulating Obesity Targets IR injury hsa-miR-21 hsa-miR-423 hsa-miR-126 hsa-miR-143 Targets Obesity hsa-miR-21 hsa-miR-223 hsa-miR-34a hsa-miR-17 Targets CAD hsa-miR-223 hsa-miR-92a hsa-miR-126 Targets IR injury hsa-miR-155 hsa-miR-21 Circulating CAD hsa-miR-126 hsa-miR-145 hsa-miR-21 Targets Obesity hsa-mir-223 hsa-mir-499 hsa-mir-574 Targets IR injury hsa-mir-21 Circulating IR injury Targets Obesity hsa-mir-21 Targets CAD hsa-mir-22 hsa-mir-133a Targets IR injury hsa-mir-155 hsa-mir-21 Circulating Stroke hsa-mir-145 hsa-mir-146b Targets Obesity hsa-mir-21 hsa-mir-29b Methods Protoc.
    [Show full text]
  • Focused Examination of the Intestinal Epithelium Reveals Transcriptional
    Focused Examination of the Intestinal Epithelium Reveals Transcriptional Signatures Consistent with Disturbances in Enterocyte Maturation and Differentiation during the Course of SIV Infection Mahesh Mohan1, Deepak Kaushal2, Pyone P. Aye1, Xavier Alvarez1, Ronald S. Veazey1, Andrew A. Lackner1* 1 Division of Comparative Pathology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Covington, Louisiana, United States of America, 2 Division of Bacteriology and Parasitology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Covington, Louisiana, United States of America Abstract The Gastrointestinal (GI) tract plays a pivotal role in AIDS pathogenesis as it is the primary site for viral transmission, replication and CD4+ T cell destruction. Accordingly, GI disease (enteropathy) has become a well-known complication and a driver of AIDS progression. To better understand the molecular mechanisms underlying GI disease we analyzed global gene expression profiles sequentially in the intestinal epithelium of the same animals before SIV infection and at 21 and 90 days post infection (DPI). More importantly we obtained sequential excisional intestinal biopsies and examined distinct mucosal components (epithelium. intraepithelial lymphocytes, lamina propria lymphocytes, fibrovascular stroma) separately. Here we report data pertaining to the epithelium. Overall genes associated with epithelial cell renewal/proliferation/ differentiation, permeability and adhesion were significantly down regulated (,1.5–7 fold) at 21 and 90DPI. Genes regulating focal adhesions (n = 6), gap junctions (n = 3), ErbB (n = 3) and Wnt signaling (n = 4) were markedly down at 21DPI and the number of genes in each of these groups that were down regulated doubled between 21 and 90DPI. Notable genes included FAK, ITGA6, PDGF, TGFb3, Ezrin, FZD6, WNT10A, and TCF7L2. In addition, at 90DPI genes regulating ECM-receptor interactions (laminins and ITGB1), epithelial cell gene expression (PDX1, KLF6), polarity/tight junction formation (PARD3B&6B) and histone demethylase (JMJD3) were also down regulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Autocrine IFN Signaling Inducing Profibrotic Fibroblast Responses By
    Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on September 23, 2021 Inducing is online at: average * The Journal of Immunology , 11 of which you can access for free at: 2013; 191:2956-2966; Prepublished online 16 from submission to initial decision 4 weeks from acceptance to publication August 2013; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300376 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/191/6/2956 A Synthetic TLR3 Ligand Mitigates Profibrotic Fibroblast Responses by Autocrine IFN Signaling Feng Fang, Kohtaro Ooka, Xiaoyong Sun, Ruchi Shah, Swati Bhattacharyya, Jun Wei and John Varga J Immunol cites 49 articles Submit online. Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists ? is published twice each month by Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts http://jimmunol.org/subscription Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2013/08/20/jimmunol.130037 6.DC1 This article http://www.jimmunol.org/content/191/6/2956.full#ref-list-1 Information about subscribing to The JI No Triage! Fast Publication! Rapid Reviews! 30 days* Why • • • Material References Permissions Email Alerts Subscription Supplementary The Journal of Immunology The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2013 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. This information is current as of September 23, 2021. The Journal of Immunology A Synthetic TLR3 Ligand Mitigates Profibrotic Fibroblast Responses by Inducing Autocrine IFN Signaling Feng Fang,* Kohtaro Ooka,* Xiaoyong Sun,† Ruchi Shah,* Swati Bhattacharyya,* Jun Wei,* and John Varga* Activation of TLR3 by exogenous microbial ligands or endogenous injury-associated ligands leads to production of type I IFN.
    [Show full text]
  • Prion Characterization Using Cell Based Approaches
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Microbiology, Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Immunology, and Molecular Genetics Genetics 2012 PRION CHARACTERIZATION USING CELL BASED APPROACHES Vadim Khaychuk University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Khaychuk, Vadim, "PRION CHARACTERIZATION USING CELL BASED APPROACHES" (2012). Theses and Dissertations--Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics. 2. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/microbio_etds/2 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained and attached hereto needed written permission statements(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine). I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I agree that the document mentioned above may be made available immediately for worldwide access unless a preapproved embargo applies.
    [Show full text]
  • Enriched Genes FLX07
    enriched genes FLX07 Entrez Symbols Name TermID TermDesc 24950 MGC156498,S5AR 1,Srd5a1 steroid-5-alpha-reductase, alpha polypeptide 1 (3-oxo-5 alpha-steroid delta 4-dehydrogenase alpha 1) GO:0003865 3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase activity 361191 Nsun2,RGD1311954 NOL1/NOP2/Sun domain family, member 2 GO:0003865 3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase activity 305291 RGD1308828,S5AR 3,Srd5a3 steroid 5 alpha-reductase 3 GO:0003865 3-oxo-5-alpha-steroid 4-dehydrogenase activity 311569 Acas2,Acss2 acyl-CoA synthetase short-chain family member 2 GO:0003987 acetate-CoA ligase activity 296259 Acas2l,Acss1 acyl-CoA synthetase short-chain family member 1 GO:0003987 acetate-CoA ligase activity 25288 ACS,Acas,Acsl1,COAA,Facl2 acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 1 GO:0003987 acetate-CoA ligase activity 114024 Acs3,Acsl3,Facl3 acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 3 GO:0003987 acetate-CoA ligase activity 299002 G2e3,RGD1310263 G2/M-phase specific E3 ubiquitin ligase GO:0016881 acid-amino acid ligase activity 361866 Hace1 HECT domain and ankyrin repeat containing, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 GO:0016881 acid-amino acid ligase activity 316395 Hecw2 HECT, C2 and WW domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 2 GO:0016881 acid-amino acid ligase activity 309758 Herc4 hect domain and RLD 4 GO:0016881 acid-amino acid ligase activity 361815 MGC116114,Rnf8 ring finger protein 8 GO:0016881 acid-amino acid ligase activity 298576 Mul1,RGD1309944 mitochondrial ubiquitin ligase activator of NFKB 1 GO:0016881 acid-amino acid ligase activity
    [Show full text]
  • Name Aliases Binding Partner Physiology / Oncology References
    Name Aliases Binding partner Physiology / Oncology References AJAP1 Adherens junction associated protein 1, ? PHY : Expressed in uterus and pancreas. [1] http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q9UKB5. [2] SHREW1 Plays a role in cell adhesion and migration. McDonald JM, Cancer Biol Ther 2006, 5:300-4 Forms a complex with CDH1 and beta-catenin at adherens junctions [1] ONC : Frequently deleted in oligodendrogliomas, functions to inhibit cell adhesion and migration [2] ALCAM Activated leukocyte cell adhesion CD6 PHY : Adhesion of activated leukocytes and [1] Ofori-Acquah SF, Transl Res 2008, 151:122- molecule, CD166, MEMD (melanoma neurons 8. [2] van Kilsdonk JW, Cancer Res 2008, metastasis clone D) 68:3671-9 ONC : Expressed by different tumor types including melanoma; mediates cancer/ melanoma invasiveness [1,2] AMICA1 Adhesion molecule interacting with CXADR PHY : Expression is restricted to the [1] http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q86YT9. [2] CXADR antigen 1, JAML (junctional hematopoietic tissues with the exception of Moog-Lutz C, Blood 2003, 102:3371-8 adhesion molecule-like) liver. May function in transmigration of leukocytes through epithelial and endothelial tissues. Mediates adhesive interactions with CXADR, a protein of the junctional complex of epithelial cells [1] ONC : Enhances myeloid leukemia cell adhesion to endothelial cells [2] AMIGO1 Amphoterin-induced gene and open AMIGO PHY : May be involved in fasciculation as well [1] http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q86WK6 reading frame 1, Alivin-2 as myelination of developing neural axons. May have a role in regeneration as well as neural plasticity in the adult nervous system. May mediate homophilic as well as heterophilic cell-cell interaction and contribute to signal transduction through its intracellular domain [1] ONC : - AMIGO2 Amphoterin-induced gene and open AMIGO PHY : Highest levels in breast, ovary, cervix, [1] http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q86SJ2.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining the Human Brain Proteome Using Transcriptomics and Antibody-Based Profiling with a Focus on the Cerebral Cortex
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Defining the Human Brain Proteome Using Transcriptomics and Antibody-Based Profiling with a Focus on the Cerebral Cortex Evelina Sjöstedt1,2, Linn Fagerberg1, Björn M. Hallström1, Anna Häggmark1, Nicholas Mitsios3, Peter Nilsson1, Fredrik Pontén2, Tomas Hökfelt3, Mathias Uhlén1, Jan Mulder3* 1 Science for Life Laboratory, School of Biotechnology, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2 Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala a11111 University, Uppsala, Sweden, 3 Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS Citation: Sjöstedt E, Fagerberg L, Hallström BM, The mammalian brain is a complex organ composed of many specialized cells, harboring Häggmark A, Mitsios N, Nilsson P, et al. (2015) sets of both common, widely distributed, as well as specialized and discretely localized pro- Defining the Human Brain Proteome Using teins. Here we focus on the human brain, utilizing transcriptomics and public available Transcriptomics and Antibody-Based Profiling with a Human Protein Atlas (HPA) data to analyze brain-enriched (frontal cortex) polyadenylated Focus on the Cerebral Cortex. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0130028. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130028 messenger RNA and long non-coding RNA and generate a genome-wide draft of global and cellular expression patterns of the brain. Based on transcriptomics analysis of alto- Academic Editor: Ramani Ramchandran, Medical College of Wisconsin, UNITED STATES gether 27 tissues, we have estimated that approximately 3% (n=571) of all protein coding genes and 13% (n=87) of the long non-coding genes expressed in the human brain are Received: March 9, 2015 enriched, having at least five times higher expression levels in brain as compared to any of Accepted: May 15, 2015 the other analyzed peripheral tissues.
    [Show full text]