DOCSLIB.ORG

Ebook Download Delusions of Gender : How Our Minds, Society

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ebook Download Delusions of Gender : How Our Minds, Society DELUSIONS OF GENDER : HOW OUR MINDS, SOCIETY, AND NEUROSEXISM CREATE DIFFERENCE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Cordelia Fine | 368 pages | 08 Aug 2011 | WW Norton & Co | 9780393340242 | English | New York, United States Delusions of Gender : How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference PDF Book They regarded themselves as more stereotypically feminine, compared with another group of women who were expecting instead to interact with a man with a more modern view of their sex. Published August 30th by W. Lastly, I have to fault my own expectations because I thought I was going to read a book that acknowledged gender identity as well as gender stereotypes but so far I haven't seen anything of the sort. Fine is incisive in her discussion and criticism of studies around the effect of testosterone, including play differences, but she is damning when it comes to the shocking dishonesty and misrepresentation employed by 'neurosexist' popular 'science' books. Delusions of Gender. Men had stronger spatial and mathematical skills, and women had stronger verbal and emotional skills, and this all dovetailed sensibly with various biological and evolutionary stories. For example, if a girl who is just about to write an exam is told that girls normally perform worse than boys on this type of exam, then her brain will be primed to do worse, regardless of her actual skill level. View all 5 comments. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. So she left and went to Methodist Ladies College, the posh girls equivalent. Cordelia Fine attempts to refute the popular idea that men and women have an innate neurological difference which results in different brains. But is that really what the latest science does tell us about the differences between male and female brains? She links these ideas to much older ideas about sex and gender. Just to be clear: It is not possible to find biological determinants of gender, because gender is learned social behavior, and, as such, varies significantly between social groups and over time. Each claim she makes in this section is backed up by solid research, and all her sources are outlined in the endnotes and bibliography, which together span about 80 pages. Supppose, for example, you're a neuroscientist interested in what parts of the brain are involved in mind reading. More Details We start to think of ourselves in terms of our gender, and stereotypes and social expectations become more prominent in the mind. A quote in the original read: "These cultural lores Is this a TERF book? A growing number of Americans believe there's an "immutable" biological difference between the male and female brain. Fine also points to the important concept of neuroplasticity, or how our brains are constantly being shaped by external factors, such as our social environment and experiences: If testers know the sex of a baby as they usually willthat may skew how they interact. Not so much, says Cordelia Fine. Everyone should read this. Men and women are physically different. And she provides some guidance to the layperson in terms of how we can approach learning about sex and gender, from a scientific perspective, in the future. Delusions of Gender : How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference Writer Truly a brilliant book. However, I was impressed by the detail and depth of the research done in order to demonstrate why much of the science 'proving' that little girls are 'hardwired' to like pink dresses and Barbie dolls is nonsense. Why are there so few women in science and engineering, so few men in the laundry room? He cites this book as an influence on his ideas about gender preferences not being innate. Fine engages in occasional snark, which was a little tiresome, followed by a lot of discussion of studies in which subjects are either told or not told statements about gender and then asked to perform certain tasks, to see if a focus on gender impairs their abilities. Download as PDF Printable version. She criticises others for lazy stereotyping and in the next sentence suggests that men are not so keen on attending male-dominated conferences because there's less opportunity for sex. Finally, she puts it all together, along with research from many other areas, in a way that is dryly amusing, occasionally snarky, but I think probably very clear even for those who don't read medical journals for work. If there are innate differences, then she should just say so and stop equivocating. But other experts passionately disagree. Uploaded by Lotu Tii on February 5, Johanna Berliner It's really neither - while she doesn't touch on trans folks at all, the book is absolutely the opposite of gender essentialist. She reviews the standard gaps in workforce distribution, in pay, in equity of housework and other caring labour. As for the mother who couldn't understand why her daughter swaddled, cuddled and put to bed her toy hammer - perhaps the reason was that it was always her mother, and never her father, that put her to bed. One study showed a clear Warning: ranty. Fine makes a good case that many of the differences we see in gender could readily be traced back to cultural or sociological phenomena, and that it is too early to declare tha Cordelia Fine attempts to refute the popular idea that men and women have an innate neurological difference which results in different brains. She shows that the fact that we spend our lives in environments that promote gender differentiation makes those differences nothing more than self-fulfilling prophecies. View all 10 comments. The neuroscience that we read about in magazines, newspaper articles, books, and sometimes even scientific journals increasingly tells a tale of two brains, and the result is more often than not a validation of the status quo. An overall thesis of the work is the negative impact for sex equality of neurosexism popular or academic neuroscientific claims that reinforce or justify gender stereotypes in ways that are not scientifically justified. Because it is hilarious. About Cordelia Fine. Basically, inventing an opening is not a useful activity in any normal sense of the word. Quite simply such work is lying and there should be an appropriate punishment. Get help. Fine has plenty more to say about how shoddy a lot of the research is, how biased the interpretations of it, and so on. I shall do it justice with a worthy review! I like nothing better than to discover that I was completely and utterly mistaken about something. Welcome back. To ask other readers questions about Delusions of Gender , please sign up. She quotes trans woman Jan Morris who describes her former competence in matters of car-reversing and bottle-opening evaporating after her transition in the face of others' assumptions about her. Prose: Don't think this will fulfill your final beach read of the summer—Fine's prose is highly sourced, and heavy. Fine, Cordelia. Nielsen Business Media. Delusions of Gender : How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference Reviews Delusions of Gender' argues that faulty science is furthering sexism" ' ". Oct 06, Lobstergirl rated it really liked it. They start before birth and imbue our life, as self-fulfilling prophesies, however much we try to go against them. They quickly graduate from being gender detectives to gender enforcement agents. Despite the fact that my lifetime score against Grandmaster Short is in my favor, I would like to make it clear that I in no way consider myself more intelligent than he is. And it places a burden on such researchers to be doubly careful about extrapolating from their results. June 15, Passionately argued and unfailingly astute, Delusions of Gender provides us with a much-needed corrective to the belief that men's and women's brains are intrinsically different-a belief that, as Fine shows with insight and humor, all too often works to the detriment of ourselves and our society. Actually number 2 really doesn't exist, which is odd, as women may be ordained in the C of E. Congress, E-Government Act of Instead, Fine shows that there are almost no areas of performance that are not touched by cultural stereotypes. Surely the fraudulent behaviour of the author of The Female Brain ought to disqualify her for life from being able to write another book — but I see that despite a review in Nature after her first book was printed pointing out the remarkable in fact, incomprehensible and gobsmacking weaknesses and down-right misinformation in that book, she was able to publish another on much the same topic called The Male Brain. But man, it was tough to get through. By Cordelia Fine. Our membership in ETAS has temporarily doubled our digital collections, adding 3 million additional items. Just way till I get my hands on a computer! Read more But before this happens, speculation becomes elevated to the status of fact, especially in the hands of some popular writers. Fine agrees that there are differences between men and women's brains. View all 9 comments. God damn! View 1 comment. Friend Reviews. They admired the way it went all the way up to her breasts. Guardian News and Media. Delusions of Gender is split into three sections, all of which argue the same thing: there are no discernible neurological differences between males and females. And, if we only believe this,it will continue to unravel. Add This to Your Vocab Neurosexism—it's sexism that's disguised in neuroscience that reflects and reinforces cultural beliefs about gender. Buzz Rating: Hum The New York Times reviewed the book last week , and the feminist blogosphere is sure to take the buzz up a notch.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Addiction and the Female Brain by Jeffrey Georgi, M.Div., MAH, LCAS, CGP Consulting Associate Div
    Addiction and the female brain by Jeffrey Georgi, M.Div., MAH, LCAS, CGP Consulting Associate Div. of Addiction Research and Translation Duke University Medical Center Georgi Educational and Counseling Services [email protected] 919-286-1600 and the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time TSE © GECS Biological+Psychological+Social+Spiritual Vulnerability Liability Context Bankruptcy plus experience/relationships equals woman © GECS 1 Women’s brains the obvious Women’s brains are part of women’s bodies Women’s bodies are supported by a complex web interconnected relationships Women’s relationships fall within a social and historical context The complexity of the female brain’s neural net and it’s virtually infinite relational and cultural tapestry defies definition Our task this week is inherently reductionistic © GECS Biological+Psychological+Social+Spiritual Vulnerability Liability Context Bankruptcy plus experience/relationships equals Addiction © GECS © GECS 2 © GECS © GECS © GECS 3 X © GECS © GECS 4 © GECS Other Suggestions Disease makes good people make mistakes – they still are good people but need to be held accountable Willpower will not work over time The limbic system is not reasonable Addiction is not a choice Addiction makes almost any psychiatric disorder more difficult and more dangerous © GECS prefrontal cortex orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) © GECS 5 Corpus callosum Anterior cingulate cortex frontal frontal cortex - Nucleus accumbens Hypothalamus Pre Olfactory bulb Amygdala Hippocampus © GECS Women’s brains general principles Structurally the differences between the male and female brain are real but they are subtle and important. Areas where there are differences matter and need to be addressed clinically.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet: Critically Thinking About the Brain and Gender Differences
    Davison, Ryan C. (2012) Critically Thinking About the Brain and Gender Differences. In B. Bogue & E. Cady (Eds.). Apply Research to Practice (ARP) Resources. Retrieved <Month Day, Year> from http://www.engr.psu.edu/AWE/ARPResources.aspx. Information Sheet: Critically Thinking About the Brain and Gender Differences By Ryan C. Davison, American Chemical Society In January 2005 the president of Harvard University, Larry Summers, spoke at the Conference on Diversifying the Science & Engineering Workforce. In this now famous speech, Dr. Summers suggested that the reason fewer women succeed in science and math careers may be due to innate gender differences. Educators were stunned that such a credible and prominent academic authority would make these statements. They could easily imagine a situation where a female grade school student, or her teacher, hears Dr. Summers’ comments and accepts them as true because they come from the president of an Ivy League institution. These remarks demonstrate that well-educated people can be ignorant about fields outside their own and exemplify the need to apply critical thinking to the source of information before considering an idea as valid. Of the many questions that Dr. Summers’ statements provoke, none is more important than asking what scientific data, if any, his claim is based upon. Summers supported his opinion with only anecdotal information, which is a poor scientific practice. In his talk he cited “a woman he worked with at the Treasury Department” who said that only three of the 22 women in her graduate school class were working full time. He also mentioned his twin daughters, who when given trucks to play with pretended the trucks were dolls saying, “Look, the daddy truck is carrying the baby truck.” Additionally, Summers stated that his conclusions were based on “a fair amount of reading the literature and a lot of talking to people.” Obviously, developing a theory based on the behavior of your friends, children, and other acquaintances does not allow generalization to the rest of the population.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Binary Or Genderqueer Genders
    International Review of Psychiatry ISSN: 0954-0261 (Print) 1369-1627 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iirp20 Non-binary or genderqueer genders Christina Richards, Walter Pierre Bouman, Leighton Seal, Meg John Barker, Timo O. Nieder & Guy T’Sjoen To cite this article: Christina Richards, Walter Pierre Bouman, Leighton Seal, Meg John Barker, Timo O. Nieder & Guy T’Sjoen (2016) Non-binary or genderqueer genders, International Review of Psychiatry, 28:1, 95-102, DOI: 10.3109/09540261.2015.1106446 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2015.1106446 Published online: 12 Jan 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 174 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 1 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=iirp20 Download by: [212.200.65.127] Date: 18 February 2016, At: 12:21 INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 2016 VOL. 28, NO. 1, 95–102 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2015.1106446 REVIEW ARTICLE Non-binary or genderqueer genders Christina Richardsa,b, Walter Pierre Boumana, Leighton Sealb, Meg John Barkerc, Timo O. Niederd and Guy T’Sjoene aNottingham Centre for Gender Dysphoria, Nottingham, UK; bCharing Cross Gender Identity Clinic, London, UK; cDepartment of Psychology in Social Sciences, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK; dInterdisciplinary Transgender Health Care Centre Hamburg, Department for Sex Research and Forensic Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Germany; eCentre for Sexology and Gender, Department of Endocrinology, Ghent University, Belgium ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Some people have a gender which is neither male nor female and may identify as both male and Received 29 June 2015 female at one time, as different genders at different times, as no gender at all, or dispute the very Accepted 6 October 2015 idea of only two genders.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroscience and Sex/Gender
    Neuroethics (2012) 5:211–215 DOI 10.1007/s12152-012-9165-5 EDITORIAL NOTE Neuroscience and Sex/Gender Isabelle Dussauge & Anelis Kaiser Received: 4 September 2012 /Accepted: 13 September 2012 /Published online: 2 October 2012 # Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 This special issue publishes interdisciplinary scholar- hosts very different epistemological approaches, a ship which aims to map and re-imagine the relations common knowledge of neuroscience and gender between neuroscience and gender studies. studies was a prerequisite for the group’stheoret- ical and methodological exchange. The participants lively debated crucial issues, from current research neuroGenderings: The Network on sex/gender difference in neuropsychology, through the implications of notions of sex/gender, The authors of the present special issue were all par- gender identity and sexuality used in neuroscien- ticipants in the workshop neuroGenderings: Critical tific experimentation, to the social workings of a Studies of the Sexed Brain (Uppsala, 2010). Then co- sexed/gendered brain. organizers, now guest editors, we work in gender More precisely, the neuroGenderings workshop studies, neuroscience, and science and technology achieved an impressive first mapping of the research studies. In 2010, we did not know for a fact that the on sex/gender in neurosciences and the methodological neuroGenderings initiative would grow and develop frames used in those sciences. We discussed, for in- into an international network and conference series. stance, the role assigned to “sexed” regions of the brain, Now we know. by analyzing the relevance of the notion of sexual di- In neuroGenderings, a transdisciplinary and inter- morphism, itself a system of significance that is always national group of researchers from the neurosciences, and solely framed by neuro-logical sexual dichotomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Debating Sex Differences in Cognition: We Can Do Better What I Learnt Teaching Cordelia Fine’S “Delusions of Gender”
    Debating sex differences in cognition: we can do better What I learnt teaching Cordelia Fine’s “Delusions of Gender” Tom Stafford, @tomstafford University of Sheffield The graduate class PSY6316 ‘Current Issues in Cognitive Neuroscience’. MSc course, ~15 people. Stafford, T. (2008), A fire to be lighted: a case-study in enquiry-based learning, Practice and Evidence of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 3, No. 1, April 2008, pp.20-42. “There are sex differences in the brain” Fine (Delusions, Introduction, p xxvii) “Anti-sex difference” investigators? Cahill (2014) http://www.dana.org/Cerebrum/2014/Equal_%E2%89%A0_The_Same__Sex_Differences_in_the_Hu man_Brain/ https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2017/01/20/are-male-and-female-brains-absolutely-identical/ Sarah Ditum, The Guardian, 18th January 2017 Not what Fine thinks. Not what Ditum thinks. Headline chosen by subeditor Original: http://web.archive.org/web/20170118081437/www.theguardian.com/books/2017/jan/18/testosterone- rex-review-cordelia-fine Current: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/jan/18/testosterone-rex-review-cordelia-fine We can do better We can quantify the size of differences Interpreting Cohen's d effect size an interactive visualization by Kristoffer Magnusson http://rpsychologist.com/d3/cohend/ Sex differences in cognition are small https://mindhacks.com/2017/02/14/sex-differences-in-cognition-are-small/ The Gender similarities hypothesis “The differences model, which argues that males and females are vastly different psychologically, dominates the popular media. Here, the author advances a very different view, the gender similarities hypothesis, which holds that males and females are similar on most, but not all, psychological variables” Hyde, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Existence, Cognitive Attributes and Potential Pathological Consequences of the Extreme Female Brain
    INVESTIGATING THE EXISTENCE, COGNITIVE ATTRIBUTES AND POTENTIAL PATHOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE EXTREME FEMALE BRAIN Sarah Louise JONES Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Division of Psychology Faculty of Social Sciences University of Bradford 2 0 1 6 Abstract INVESTIGATING THE EXISTENCE, COGNITIVE ATTRIBUTES AND POTENTIAL PATHOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE EXTREME FEMALE BRAIN Sarah Louise Jones Key words: extreme female brain, empathising, systemising, sex differences, autism, schizophrenia, memory, cognition, gene imprinting, paranoid ideation The ‘extreme female brain’ (EFB) is derived from the empathising - systemising theory (E-S) which hypothesises that sex differences in cognition exist on a continuum, based on abilities in ‘empathising’ and ‘systemising’ (Baron-Cohen, 2003). The EFB profile; extreme empathising alongside deficient systemising, has received little attention in social cognitive neuroscience research, compared to the extreme male brain, which has advanced the knowledge of sex differences in the expression of autism. Currently, there is no solid evidence of a clinical pathology relating to the EFB nor a marker of cognition associated with a person’s ‘place’ on the E-S continuum. Here, an episodic memory paradigm with social and non-social conditions was given to participants along with measures of empathising and systemising. Scores on the social condition predicted where a person lies on the E-S continuum. The thesis then investigated the hypothesis that schizophrenia is expressed in the feminised profile (Badcock & Crepsi, 2006) i and the presumption that empathising and systemising demonstrate a trade­ off. Elements of paranoia were associated with an empathising bias. However, a bias in systemising ability was associated with schizotypy along with a significant overlap in the expression of autistic traits and schizotypy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Female Brain Conceptual Advances in Brain Research a Series of Books Focusing on Brain Dynamics and Information Processing Systems of the Brain
    The Female Brain Conceptual Advances in Brain Research A series of books focusing on brain dynamics and information processing systems of the brain. Edited by Robert Miller, Otago Centre for Theoretical Studies in Psychiatry and Neuro- science, New Zealand (Editor-in-chief), Günther Palm, University of Ulm, Germany and Gordon Shaw, University of California at Irvine, USA. Volume 1 Brain Dynamics and the Striatal Complex edited by R. Miller and J.R. Wickens Volume 2 Complex Brain Functions: Conceptual Advances in Russian Neuroscience edited by R. Miller, A.M. Ivanitsky and P.M. Balaban Volume 3 Time and the Brain edited by R. Miller Volume 4 Sex Differences in Lateralization in the Animal Brain by V.L. Bianki and E.B. Filippova Volume 5 Cortical Areas: Unity and Diversity edited by A. Schüz and R. Miller Volume 6 The Female Brain by C. Darlington This book is part of a series. The publisher will accept continuation orders which may be cancelled at any time and which provide for automatic billing and shipping of each title in the series upon publication. Please write for details. The Female Brain Cynthia Darlington University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand London and New York First published 2002 by Taylor & Francis 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Taylor & Francis Inc, 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Taylor & Francis is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003. © 2002 Taylor & Francis All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference
    P a g e | 145 Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference Author: Cordelia Fine, 2010, Published by W. W. Norton & Company Book review by Sorana-Alexandra CONSTANTINESCU Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania [email protected] This book is an alternative to the vast literature that aims to show us why women are from Venus and men are from Mars. As pretentions it might sound, I consider this book to be a must read for everybody, not only for academics or researchers. Gender myth perpetuation can be in some proportion stopped by educating people about the various biases that can interfere with the outcome of studies on sex and gender, and the factors that can favor or inhibit their popularization outside academia, which could, in the long run, lead to a discrediting or at least a critical reception of the wealth of pseudo- scientific claims of biologically inherent differences in the psychological and social construction of men and women. Emphasis in writings that explain that there are hard-wired differences between men and women is placed upon the fine-tuned emotional skills of women, as opposed to their emotionally helpless male counterpart, to sugarcoat the inherently misogynistic message at the core of these studies: it is due to the very nature of our species that women are underrepresented in the hard sciences and mathematics, in leadership etc., not due to historical systemic oppression. While the history of sexism is not explicitly denied, it is provided with an implicit excuse in an appeal to nature, and the active role of excluding women from the political, economic and academic spheres is thus minimized, and passed off as being in a large part due to women being, on average, naturally deficient in the necessary skills required to be involved in these activities.
    [Show full text]
  • How Men and Women Lead Differently
    How Men and Women Lead Differently For much of the twentieth century, most scientists assumed that women were essentially small men, neurologically and in every other sense except for their reproductive functions. That assumption has been at the heart of enduring misunderstandings. When you look a little deeper into the brain differences, they reveal what makes women, women and men, men. —Louann Brizendine, M.D., author of The Female Brain Female Leaders Male Leaders Interactive Transactional Participative Hierarchal Collaborate connectively Collaborate competitively Group problem solve Personally problem solve Inductive in problem solving Deductive in problem solving Define themselves by being relationally literate Define themselves through accomplishments Prefer to be recognized Ask to be recognized Ascertains the exact needs of each team member Cares more about larger structural needs Emphasize complex and multi-tasking activities Single task orientation and completion Helps others express emotions Downplays emotions Directly empathizes Promotes independent resolution Cognizant of the specific needs of many at once Cognizant of the needs of the organization Verbally encourages and praises Encourages less feeling and more action Resolves emotional conflicts to reduce stress Denies emotional vulnerability to reduce stress Female leaders: Tend to be more interactive, wanting to keep interactions extended and vital until the interaction has worked through its emotional content. Tend more toward participative teams—to find ways in which colleagues are complementary. It is probable that higher oxytocin levels affect this leadership quality—the more support women build around them, the lower their stress level, and the more effective they may be as leaders. Tend to collaborate connectively by seeking possible connections between each person’s different ideas—and try to find developmental elements in the connectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gendered Brain©
    The Gendered Brain© Student Manual Version 3 – January 2012 Course Designers Gail Hooker & Amy Lewis 1 The Brain at Ease, Energized & Wired 2 Ice Breakers Some ice breakers promote and “nurture empathy by offering children an opportunity to practice taking care of others.” They often give the teacher the chance to “teach skills…of social interest through sharing, listening, inclusion, participation and dialogue,” as well as, “to merge social, emotional, and intellectual learning” (Responsive Classroom, 2003). Some involve movement, giving student the opportunity to reenergize and maintain focus throughout the school day. It is crucial to provide time in school for students to bond with each other and with the teacher. Chemicals released in the brain during such activities aid in promoting calm and maintaining focus. “They need the encouragement and validation that comes from our best attention to their efforts. They need the safety that comes from the belief that their teacher sees them, knows them. Mutual trust grows from this security.” -Ruth Sidney Charney, author of Teaching Children to Care “Covering the curriculum is the death of education.” – John Dewey “I never let my education get in the way of my learning.” - Mark Twain 3 Puzzle Making 1. In teams, instruct students to select one colored crayon to use as they contribute to a team picture. Instruct them to keep the pictures simple each adding a line or two as they circulate the paper taking turns until you tell them to stop. Then have them cut the picture into as many pieces as there are teammates (ie. four teammates = four puzzle pieces).
    [Show full text]
  • Women, Cycling, and the Public Sphere: How Discursive and Community Practices Affect Engagement
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports - Open Reports 2015 WOMEN, CYCLING, AND THE PUBLIC SPHERE: HOW DISCURSIVE AND COMMUNITY PRACTICES AFFECT ENGAGEMENT Elsa L. Roberts Michigan Technological University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the Linguistics Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Copyright 2015 Elsa L. Roberts Recommended Citation Roberts, Elsa L., "WOMEN, CYCLING, AND THE PUBLIC SPHERE: HOW DISCURSIVE AND COMMUNITY PRACTICES AFFECT ENGAGEMENT", Master's Thesis, Michigan Technological University, 2015. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etds/915 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the Linguistics Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons WOMEN, CYCLING, AND THE PUBLIC SPHERE: HOW DISCURSIVE AND COMMUNITY PRACTICES AFFECT ENGAGEMENT By Elsa L. Roberts A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In Rhetoric and Technical Communication MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2015 © 2015 Elsa L. Roberts This thesis has been approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Rhetoric and Technical Communication. Department of Humanities Thesis Advisor: Victoria L. Bergvall Committee Member: Lauren M. Bowen Committee Member: M. Ann Brady Committee Member: Donald J. Lafreniere Department Chair: Ronald Strickland To my grandmother, who believed in me when no one else did. To my partner and best friend, who has been by my side since I was 18. And to my other best friend who is the Jake to my Finn, together we inhabit the struggle.
    [Show full text]
  • Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference. by CORDELIA FINE. New York: W. W. Norton Comp
    INVITED REVIEW ESSAY Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference. By CORDELIA FINE. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2010. Brain Storm: The Flaws in the Science of Sex Differences.ByREBECCAM. JORDAN-YOUNG. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2010. Letitia Meynell “…we’re only trying to find the biological roots to gender inequality, so why be fussy, right?” (Fine, 108). That the search for dimorphic cognitive, affective, and behavioral sex differences con- tinues is no doubt a source of anxiety for those who have long embraced a feminist or progressive ideal of equality for all postnatal humans, regardless of their sex/gender (or other) identities. Indeed, the prevalence of media reports and best-selling accounts of scientific findings of fundamental neurological, psychological, and behavioral sex dif- ferences, in addition to the studies themselves, may give the most ardent feminists among us occasion to suspect that there might just be something to it: Putting aside the many queer, trans, and intersexed exceptions—for which some biological explana- tion must also, presumably, exist—a rational consideration of the mountain of evi- dence surely suggests that our natural history really has produced two fundamentally different types of people: men and women. Or so one might suppose. Feminists strug- gling with this haunting doubt would do well to take a look at Cordelia Fine’s Delu- sions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference and Rebecca Jordan-Young’s Brain Storm: The Flaws in the Science of Sex Differences as effective remedies. These recent books join a now extensive literature by feminist aca- demics, both within and outside the biological and mind sciences, that meticulously and critically dissect empirical claims about human sex differences as they pertain to cognition, emotions, and behavior.
    [Show full text]