DOCSLIB.ORG

Soviet-Romanian Relations and the Bessarabian Question in the Early 1920S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soviet-Romanian Relations and the Bessarabian Question in the Early 1920S DOV B. LUNGU (London, United Kingdom) Soviet-Romanian Relations and the Bessarabian Question in the Early 1920s In the history of relations between Russia and Romania, the Soviet ultima- tum on Bessarabia of June, 1940, signified the end of an era. This era began in the last stages of World War I and was marked by the seemingly insoluble conflict over Bessarabia, which prevented the two countries from attaining more than a precarious degree of regularity in their mutual relations. The historical roots of the Bessarabian question go back to the early nine- teenth century when, as a result of the 1806-12 Russo-Turkish war, about half of the vassal principality of Moldavia was handed over by the Ottoman Empire to its Russian counterpart. This act set off a chain of claims and coun- terclaims to eastern Moldavia, otherwise known as Bessarabia, marring the sub- sequent evolution of relations between Russia and Romania. Thus, in 1856, as a result of the Crimean War, part of Bessarabia was reunited with Moldavia, only to be reincorporated into the Russian Empire in 1878 at the end of the war with Turkey in which Romania and Russia fought side by side. Because of this disappointment, Romania tried thereafter to avoid close relations with its powerful eastern neighbor. During World War I, however, the two countries were allies once again. The Romanian king and government decided, not with- out hesitation, to join the Entente, considering Transylvania as a potential gain preferable to Bessarabia. But when war ended, Romania, beyond all ex- pectations, obtained both provinces, and paradoxically it was Bessarabia which it acquired first. The more important details of the circumstances in which Bessarabia re- verted to Romanian possession are still shrouded in obscurity, existing accounts being either notoriously biased toward one side or another, or too general to provide an intelligible picture. In spite of these difficulties a few general points are discernible from the existing literature on the subject. 1. For the Romanian thesis, see: Al. Boldur, La Bessarabie et les relations russe-rou- maines (Paris: J. Gamber, 1927); St. Graur, La Roumanie et le 7larisme Bucure§fi: 1930); Gh. Bratianu, La Bessarabie droits nationaux et historiques (Bucharest: 1943); D. Tn. Pârvu, ProblemaBasarabiei in lumina principiilor internationale (Bucure?ti: 1943); A. Popovici, The Political Status of Bessarabia (Washington, D.C.: Ransdell, 1931). For the Russian thesis, see: J. Okhotnikov et N. Batchinsky, La Bessarabieet la Paix Europg- enne (Paris and Prague: Association des emigres bessarabiens, 1927); L. N. Aleksandrii, Bessarabiiai bessarabskiivopros (Moscow: Gos. izd-vo, 1924); Christian Rakowsky, Rou- manie et Bessarabie (Paris: Librairie du travail, 1925). For non-Romanian accounts in support of the Romanian point of view, see: R. W. Seton-Watson,Histoire des Roumains 30 Bessarabia united with Romania in March 1918 at the end of what appears to have been a gradual process of separation from Russia, beginning immedi- ately after the October Revolution, which was also experienced by other pro- vinces situated on the periphery of the former Russian Empire. There is little doubt that in its origins this process was genuinely local, Romania appearing as a factor only in January, 1918, when her troops entered Bessarabia with the declared purpose of defending their rear bases of supplies which, as they were situated in the province, were threatened by the ravaging troops of Russian soldiers fleeing from the Eastern Front. Owing to scarce and unreliable evi- dence, it is difficult to assess the role played by the government in Bucharest in Bessarabian events which culminated several months later in the decision by the local legislative assembly to unite with Romania. However, outright coercion by Romania of the Bessarabian population, of which about 60 per- cent were of Romanian stock, seems improbable, although the strength of the nationalistic Romanian movement in the province is unclear. The events in Bessarabia had immediate repercussions on relations between Romania and the new regime in Russia. Following the entry of Romanian troops into the province, the Soviet government declared war on Romania and confiscated her treasury and art objects deposited in Moscow.2 When the union of Bessarabia with Romania was effected in March, 1918, Soviet Russia con- demned that act and categorically denied its validity.3 The Soviet government never officially departed from its initial position regarding the territorial con- flict with Romania, but in the first post-war years a degree of willingness to compromise over Bessarabia is clearly observable. Only later did the Soviet Union adopt a tougher line in regard to the Bessarabian question and its solu- tion, which finally materialized in the June, 1940, ultimatum. * * * The attitude of Romania toward the civil war and foreign intervention in Russia was one of non-interference. Some Romanian political factions were disposed to participate in the anti-Bolshevik campaign, but caution prevailed, (Paris: 1937), p. 570, and Ch. Upson Clark, Bessarabia, Russia and Romania at the Black Sea (New York: Dodd, Mead, 1927). For a non-Russian account in support of the Rus- sian point of view, see L. Fischer, The Soviets in WorldAffairs, 1917-29, 2 vols. (Prince- ton : Princeton Univ. Press, 1951), I, 79-81. 2. Dokumenty vneshnei politiki SSSR [hereafter DVPSSSR], I, doc. 52: "Declara- tion on the severence of diplomatic relations with Romania." The Romanian govern- ment decided at the end of 1916 to transfer the gold reserves of the National Bank of Romania, which they feared would fall into the hands of the advancing German army, to Moscow for greater safety. The total value of the gold, jewels, and objects of art de- posited in Moscow amounted to 320 million lei in gold. See N. Gr. Romascanu, Tezaurul României de la Moscova(Bucure5ti: Cartea Romaneasca, 1934), p. 20. 3. DVPSSSR,I, doc. 136: "Soviet protest against the occupation of Bessarabia." .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Moldova, Moldavia, Bessarabia Yefim Kogan, 25 September 2015
    Moldova, Moldavia, Bessarabia Yefim Kogan, 25 September 2015 Dear Researchers, I have received recently an email from Marilyn Newman: Hello Yefim, I've been following this project and appreciate your more complete break down in today's Jewishgen Digest. I did contribute to Bob Wascou before he passed. The reason for this message is that I'm confused. My family were from Moinesti and Tirgu Ocna, both near each other in Moldova. However, this area was not Bessarabia..... Can you explain what areas of Moldova are covered other than Bessarabia and Chisanou (sp.). Many Thanks, Marilyn Newman Marilyn thank you. I think this is a very important question. I was getting many similar message for many years. Let’s clear this confusion. Let's start with terminology. The term Moldavia and Moldova mean the same region! Moldova is in Romanian language and Moldavia was adopted by Russian and other languages, including English. Charles King in 'The Moldovans. Romania, Russia, and the Politics of Culture', Stanford U., 1999 writes that 'It is a myth that Moldova changed its name from Moldavia. What happened in the 1990s was simply that we in the West became better informed about what locals themselves had always called it.' So let's dive into the history of the region: Moldavia is known as a country or Principality from 14 century until 1812. There were also two other Danube or Romanian Principalities - Walachia and Transilvania. At some point in the history Moldavia joined other Principalities. In 1538 Moldavia surrendered to Ottoman Empire, and remained under Turks for about 300 years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jews of Ukraine and Moldova
    CHAPTER ONE THE JEWS OF UKRAINE AND MOLDOVA by Professor Zvi Gitelman HISTORICAL BACKGROUND A hundred years ago, the Russian Empire contained the largest Jewish community in the world, numbering about 5 million people. More than 40 percent—2 million of them—lived in Ukraine SHIFTING SOVEREIGNTIES and Bessarabia (the latter territory was subsequently divided Nearly a thousand years ago, Moldova was populated by a between the present-day Ukraine and Moldova; here, for ease Romanian-speaking people, descended from Romans, who of discussion, we use the terms “Bessarabia” and “Moldova” intermarried with the indigenous Dacians. A principality was interchangeably). Some 1.8 million lived in Ukraine (west of established in the territory in the fourteenth century, but it the Dniepr River) and in Bessarabia, and 387,000 made their did not last long. Moldova then became a tributary state of homes in Ukraine (east of the Dniepr), including Crimea. the Ottoman Empire, which lost parts of it to the Russian Thousands of others lived in what was called Eastern Galicia— Empire in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. now Western Ukraine. After the 1917 Russian Revolution, part of Moldova lay Today the Jewish population of those areas is much reduced, within the borders of Romania. Eventually part of it became due to the cumulative and devastating impacts of World War I, the Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (SSR) of Moldavia, the 1917 Russian Revolution, World War II and the Holocaust, a unit within the larger Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. massive emigration since the 1970s, and a natural decrease In August 1940, as Eastern Europe was being carved up resulting from a very low birth rate and a high mortality rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Dniester Jews Between
    PARALLEL RUPTURES: JEWS OF BESSARABIA AND TRANSNISTRIA BETWEEN ROMANIAN NATIONALISM AND SOVIET COMMUNISM, 1918-1940 BY DMITRY TARTAKOVSKY DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2009 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Mark D. Steinberg, Chair Professor Keith Hitchins Professor Diane P. Koenker Professor Harriet Murav Assistant Professor Eugene Avrutin Abstract ―Parallel Ruptures: Jews of Bessarabia and Transnistria between Romanian Nationalism and Soviet Communism, 1918-1940,‖ explores the political and social debates that took place in Jewish communities in Romanian-held Bessarabia and the Moldovan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic during the interwar era. Both had been part of the Russian Pale of Settlement until its dissolution in 1917; they were then divided by the Romanian Army‘s occupation of Bessarabia in 1918 with the establishment of a well-guarded border along the Dniester River between two newly-formed states, Greater Romania and the Soviet Union. At its core, the project focuses in comparative context on the traumatic and multi-faceted confrontation with these two modernizing states: exclusion, discrimination and growing violence in Bessarabia; destruction of religious tradition, agricultural resettlement, and socialist re-education and assimilation in Soviet Transnistria. It examines also the similarities in both states‘ striving to create model subjects usable by the homeland, as well as commonalities within Jewish responses on both sides of the border. Contacts between Jews on either side of the border remained significant after 1918 despite the efforts of both states to curb them, thereby necessitating a transnational view in order to examine Jewish political and social life in borderland regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Perspectives on the Unification of the Republic of Moldova with Romania
    LawLegal Review perspectives vol. on VIII, the issue unification 2, July of-December the Republic 2018, of pp.Moldova 277-291 with Romania 277 LEGAL PERSPECTIVES ON THE UNIFICATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA WITH ROMANIA. WILL THE HISTORY REPEAT ITSELF? Dumitru Cazac Abstract The Great Union of 1918 has represented a fundamental step in the foundation of the contemporary Romanian state, whereas for Bessarabia it was a chance to retake its direction of evolution towards the west. Unfortunately, the history has separated it once again in 1944, in order to become an independent state named the Republic of Moldova, after a soviet era. Unionist tendencies were registered on both sides of the Prut river ever since 1991, and have augmented in the last years due to the worsening economic situation. This paper aims to make a legal analysis on a possible unification of the Republic of Moldova with Romania, taking into account, particularly, the EU member statute of Romania and the existence of a separatist region – Transnistria, as well as an autonomous territorial unit – Gagauzia, on the territory of the Republic of Moldova. The place where the Romanian nation has appeared has always been at the crossroads of interests between the eastern and western nations and represented the key or the gate that separated Europe from Asia. From ancient times, the nomadic tribes went through this space onto their way to Europe, while in medieval ages, this territory was considered a „gatekeeper of Christendom”. Thus, the geographical position of the birthplace of the Romanian nation was a priori a less favourable for the existence of a strong and independent state.
    [Show full text]
  • Anna-Romania Corrected2by Rivka
    Courtesy of the Ackman & Ziff Family Genealogy Institute Updated June 2011 Romania: Jewish Family History Research Guide Historical Background Like most European countries, Romania’s borders have changed considerably over time. Starting in the late 15th century, the Ottoman Empire ruled the Romanian provinces of Moldavia, Walachia, and Dobruja, while Austria and Hungary controlled Banat, Bihor, Maramures, Satu Mare, and Transylvania. Austria took over Bukovina (northwestern Moldavia) in 1774, and Russia obtained Bessarabia (eastern Moldavia) in 1812. An unsuccessful Balkan revolt against the Turks ultimately led to Russian occupation of Walachia and Moldavia from 1829-34. The two principalities merged in 1859 to form Romania (also spelled Rumania or Roumania at various times), which remained subservient to the Ottomans until full independence was achieved in 1878. The province of Dobruja was also added at that time. After World War I Romania regained control over the territories of Banat, Bessarabia, Bihor, Bukovina, Maramures, Satu Mare, and Transylvania at the expense of Austro-Hungary and Russia. During the Holocaust period, Romania temporarily gave up northern Transylvania (including northern Bihor, Maramures, and Satu Mare) to Hungary, and permanently lost northern Bukovina and Bessarabia (now the Republic of Moldova) to the Soviet Union. Jews were present in the region under the Roman Empire, but subsequent invasions and wars severely disrupted their existence. The Jewish population increased significantly after 1800, primarily due
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnicity and Politics in the Romanian Space: the Case of Northwestern Transylvania Brie, Mircea
    www.ssoar.info Ethnicity and politics in the Romanian space: the case of northwestern Transylvania Brie, Mircea Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Sammelwerksbeitrag / collection article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Brie, M. (2014). Ethnicity and politics in the Romanian space: the case of northwestern Transylvania. In S. Şipoş, G. Moisa, D. O. Cepraga, M. Brie, & T. Mateoc (Eds.), From periphery to centre: the image of Europe at the Eastern Border of Europe (pp. 158-170). Cluj-Napoca: Ed. Acad. Română. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168- ssoar-400243 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de Ethnicity and politics in the Romanian space. The case of northwestern Transylvania1 Mircea Brie Abstract. The ethnic structure of this region has been heavily influenced by the evolution of the various historico-geographical factors and policies. Most of this structure, however, is linked to the evolution of the denominational structure. Ethnicity in this case is closely related to religion. The political reality, the events with political overtones that occurred during these centurieshad a direct influence regarding the conduct of processes and phenomena related to the ethno- confessional evolution of the area subject to our research. In this period the region is part of the Austrian state (before 1867), Austro-Hungarian Empire (1867 to 1918), Hungary (1940-1944) and Romania (1918-1940, 1944 - present).
    [Show full text]
  • Background and Introduction
    Chapter One: Background and Introduction Chapter One Background and Introduction title chapter page 17 © Libor Vojtíšek, Ján Lacika, Jan W. Jongepier, Florentina Pop CHAPTER?INDD Chapter One: Background and Introduction he Carpathian Mountains encompass Their total length of 1,500 km is greater than that many unique landscapes, and natural and of the Alps at 1,000 km, the Dinaric Alps at 800 Tcultural sites, in an expression of both km and the Pyrenees at 500 km (Dragomirescu geographical diversity and a distinctive regional 1987). The Carpathians’ average altitude, how- evolution of human-environment relations over ever, of approximately 850 m. is lower compared time. In this KEO Report, the “Carpathian to 1,350 m. in the Alps. The northwestern and Region” is defined as the Carpathian Mountains southern parts, with heights over 2,000 m., are and their surrounding areas. The box below the highest and most massive, reaching their offers a full explanation of the different delimi- greatest elevation at Slovakia’s Gerlachovsky tations or boundaries of the Carpathian Mountain Peak (2,655 m.). region and how the chain itself and surrounding areas relate to each other. Stretching like an arc across Central Europe, they span seven countries starting from the The Carpathian Mountains are the largest, Czech Republic in the northwest, then running longest and most twisted and fragmented moun- east and southwards through Slovakia, Poland, tain chain in Europe. Their total surface area is Hungary, Ukraine and Romania, and finally 161,805 sq km1, far greater than that of the Alps Serbia in the Carpathians’ extreme southern at 140,000 sq km.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Ethnicity in Southern Bessarabia: Tracing the Histories Of
    The Making of Ethnicity in Southern Bessarabia: Tracing the histories of an ambiguous concept in a contested land Dissertation Zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) vorgelegt der Philosophischen Fakultät I Sozialwissenschaften und historische Kulturwissenschaften der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, von Herrn Simon Schlegel geb. am 23. April 1983 in Rorschach (Schweiz) Datum der Verteidigung 26. Mai 2016 Gutachter: PD Dr. phil. habil. Dittmar Schorkowitz, Dr. Deema Kaneff, Prof. Dr. Gabriela Lehmann-Carli Contents Deutsche Zusammenfassung ...................................................................................................................................... iii 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Questions and hypotheses ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2. History and anthropology, some methodological implications ................................................. 6 1.3. Locating the field site and choosing a name for it ........................................................................ 11 1.4. A brief historical outline .......................................................................................................................... 17 1.5. Ethnicity, natsional’nost’, and nationality: definitions and translations ............................
    [Show full text]
  • Romania: Jewish Family History Research Guide
    Courtesy of the Ackman & Ziff Family Genealogy Institute July 2007 Romania: Jewish Family History Research Guide Historical Background Like most European countries, Romania’s borders have changed considerably over time. Starting in the late 15 th century, the Ottoman Empire ruled the Romanian provinces of Moldavia, Walachia, and Dobruja, while Austria and Hungary controlled Banat, Bihor, Maramures, Satu Mare, and Transylvania. Austria took over Bukovina (northwestern Moldavia) in 1774, and Russia obtained Bessarabia (eastern Moldavia) in 1812. An unsuccessful Balkan revolt against the Turks ultimately led to Russian occupation of Walachia and Moldavia from 1829­34. The two principalities merged in 1859 to form Romania (also spelled Rumania or Roumania at various times), which remained subservient to the Ottomans until full independence was achieved in 1878. The province of Dobruja was also added at that time. After World War I Romania regained control over the territories of Banat, Bessarabia, Bihor, Bukovina, Maramures, Satu Mare, and Transylvania at the expense of Austria­Hungary and Russia. During the Holocaust period, Romania temporarily gave up northern Transylvania (including northern Bihor, Maramures, and Satu Mare) to Hungary, and permanently lost northern Bukovina and Bessarabia (now the Republic of Moldova) to the Soviet Union. Jews were present in the region under the Roman Empire, but subsequent invasions and wars severely disrupted their existence. The Jewish population increased significantly after 1800, primarily due to immigration. These resources at the Center for Jewish History contain further historical details: Encyclopedia of Eastern Europe Modern reference work gives a balanced history of disputed territories, such as Transylvania. Romanian topics are covered on pages 666­698.
    [Show full text]
  • REMAPPING UKRAINE 9Th to 21St Century AD
    REMAPPING UKRAINE 15th Century BCE to 21st Century CE Osher Lifelong Learning Institute Vanderbilt University Winter Term 2015 Mary Pat Silveira UKRAINIAN ETHNOGRAPHIC TERRITORY: 1922 THE INTERWAR YEARS • Bolshevik policy of “War Communism” • 1921: Lenin’s New Economic Policy (NEP: temporary return to market economy • USSR created as federation 1922; Union Treaty 1924 REPUBLICS OF THE SOVIET UNION • 1922: Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, and “Transcaucasia” • 1924: Transcaucasia split into Armenia, Azerbaijan & Georgia; Turkmenistan & Uzbekistan added. • 1929: Tajikistan added. • 1936: Kazakhstan & Kyrgyzstan added. • 1940: Moldova, Estonia*, Latvia* & Lithuania* added (*disputed: “occupied) 1924 UNION TREATY • Exclusive Prerogative of Central Government: – Military – Foreign relations – Foreign trade – Transportation & communications • Republics: – Economic, social & cultural affairs INDIGENIZATION • 1923: Twelfth Party Congress adopt policy of indigenization – Promote diversity – Actively recruit Ukrainians to state & party – Foster development Ukrainian culture – Expand education and publishing in Ukrainian RISE OF STALIN • Lenin dies in 1924; Stalin consolidates power • First Five Year Plan (1928-32) – returns to socialism – Large-scale industrialization – Forced collectivization of agriculture – Suppression of “bourgeois” culture – Use of state coercion and control INDUSTRIALIZATION • Ukraine benefits from 27% of 1500 new Soviet industrial plants – Includes largest hydroelectric dam in Europe – Giant tractor factory and steel mill • Most
    [Show full text]
  • Overview Print Page Close Window
    World Directory of Minorities Europe MRG Directory –> Moldova –> Moldova Overview Print Page Close Window Moldova Overview Environment Peoples History Governance Current state of minorities and indigenous peoples Environment The Republic of Moldova, formerly the Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic, is situated between Ukraine to the north, east and south, and Romania to the west. Since independence in 1991 the country has faced a secessionist challenge in its eastern region, Transnistria (also known as Transdniestria or the ‘Predniestrovian Moldovan Republic'), lying on the eastern side of the Dniester river. Peoples Main languages: Moldovan/Romanian, Russian. Main religions: Eastern Orthodox Christianity. According to the 2004 census, main minority groups include Ukrainians (8.4%), Russians (5.9%), Gagauz (4.4%), Romanians (2.2%) and Bulgarians (1.9%). History At the heart of contemporary minority problems are the different relationships that developed between Moldova's ethnic groups under the various empires that have controlled the region - the Ottoman Empire, the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union. The legacy of external control for Moldova is a society arranged around a complex series of loosely interconnected socioeconomic, political and ethno- territorial subsystems often organized on the basis of divergent sets of interests. Of central importance is the different imperial history experienced by the peoples living in the Moldovan territories east of the Dniester river and those to the west. Prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union, the left bank of the Dniester river had enjoyed almost uninterrupted links to Moscow for nearly 200 years and the region had only intermittently experienced Romanian rule. In 1791 (Treaty of Jassy), the eastern lands were absorbed into the Russian Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Bessarabian Borderlands: One Region, Two States, Multiple Ethnicities Deema Kaneff, Monica Heintz
    Bessarabian Borderlands: one region, two states, multiple ethnicities Deema Kaneff, Monica Heintz To cite this version: Deema Kaneff, Monica Heintz. Bessarabian Borderlands: one region, two states, multiple ethnicities. Anthropology of East Europe Review, 2006, State borders and local boundaries: the case of Bessarabia, 1 (24), pp. 6-16. hal-02895561 HAL Id: hal-02895561 https://hal.parisnanterre.fr//hal-02895561 Submitted on 25 Aug 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Introduction BESSARABIAN BORDERLANDS: ONE REGION, TWO STATES, MULTIPLE ETHNICITIES D. Kaneff Max Planck Jnstitute for Social Anthropology, Halle, Germany & M. Heintz University of Paris X- Nanterre In May 2003, the Governor from Odessa, between Romania and Soviet Union was relaxed after accompanied by an entourage of other officiais, 1989, but is being reinforced again, in preparation for visited a •village situated in the most southern part of the admittance of Romania to the European Union Odessa province, near the district capital of Reni on due to take place in 2007. While the rise of new the Danube river, Uhaine. The occasion for the borders and nation-states are changes to be reckoned gathering of officiais was the opening of the gas with in the region, this collection of articles also pipeline in the district.
    [Show full text]