The Spatial Legacy of Apartheid
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CITIES DIVIDED: THE SPATIAL LEGACY OF APARTHEID ____________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Honors Tutorial College Ohio University _______________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Graduation from the Honors Tutorial College with the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Art History ______________________________________ by: Bryan Stringer April 26, 2019 This thesis has been approved by: The Honors Tutorial College and the Department of Art History __________________________ Dr. Samuel Dodd Professor, Art History Thesis Advisor __________________________ Dr. Jeanette Klein Director of Studies, Art History __________________________ Cary Frith Interim Dean, Honors Tutorial College CITIES DIVIDED: THE SPATIAL LEGACY OF APARTHEID TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction........................................................................................................ 1 Modernist Urbanism................................................................................... 7 Modernist Visions of Johannesburg.............................................. 13 Johannesburgs “Modern” Highway System.......................... 24 The Flat Walls of Johannesburg 27 A Tale of Two Squares................................................................................ 32 Cities Divided 44 Transportation Along the Spine of Apartheid...................... 46 Bibliography....................................................................................................... 55 INTRODUCTION Despite the abolition of apartheid in 1994, the architectural and infrastructural legacy of its oppressive policies remain. From highways to shopping centers, the built environment of Johannesburg was constructed under apartheid spatial practices for almost a century. In 1920, the Housing Act was passed in South Africa. Its purpose, like that of so many similar pieces of legislation, was to enforce the discrimination and exclusion of all non-white racial groups. In order to further disenfranchise and control the non-white population the Housing Act ensured that all specified racial groups would be forced to remain in the designated spaces surrounding the various city centers such as Johannesburg and Cape Town. Known as Townships, these locations were often either government enforced slum districts or dormitory like “hostels” used to house the single male laborers who would have held a “bed card.” Some particularly (in)famous examples of such dormitories are those built for the migrant laborers in Langa, which is about ten miles from the Cape Town city center. Rooms in these buildings were only meant for one bed, and some of the necessities that the user brought with them. The dormitories worked to exert bodily and spatial control over single and married men through architectural and political means. The separation of families and community members helped to ensure political weakness of non-white peoples. Following the abolition of Apartheid and the installment of a Democratic government in South Africa there were still men living in the townships, and those who weren’t single were followed by their families. As previously mentioned these structures and the rooms within them were built to house one bed per person per room, meaning that they are !2 completely unequipped to provide adequate living accommodations to families. As early as 1994 the South African government had adopted policies to renovate and redevelop the single-sex hostels. The efforts to redevelop the hostels of Langa were begun in 2013 and met with success. The program was designed around providing true family housing through redeveloping the old hostels. Rooms that were originally either no larger than a prison cell or packed with dozens of bunk beds are being completely redesigned. Instead of having to share one room with other families and push the limits of what is considered a safe living environment, families are now able to rent individual units. These units have two bedrooms and ample living space for a family, and the rent scales down to the equivalent of just a few dollars USD per month based on income. Although the program has been marked by extremely slow progress and related protests, the units that have been built are slowly replacing the old hostels. Projects like the one in Langa are examples of efforts to actively change the purpose of a set of apartheid structures. Those buildings no longer hold ties to the inhumane attempts at control enforced by the apartheid government. They are homes. Now to consider another example. Sandton City is a shopping mall located just north of Johannesburg. It was constructed in the middle of a farming community in 1973 and provided all the sorts of amenities that a typical American or European mega-mall might as well: entertainment, office space, and myriad storefronts as well as restaurants and luxury hotels. There have also been several additions and renovations to Sandton City during and after Apartheid. This is important because as Jennifer Robinson points !3 out, “The power of apartheid, of the setting apart of racial groups, was therefore rooted in the spatial practices referenced in its very name.”1 If apartheid was carried out through various discriminatory spatial practices, then surely the public structures built during its oppressive tenure are still bound to it in some way or another. What is interesting, however, is that Sandton City has not gone through the same changes as the dormitories in Langa Township. Unlike the Langa dormitories, Sandton City and the surrounding municipality of Sandton have undergone very little changes in direct response to the fall of apartheid. Whereas the dormitories were completely gutted, and renovated — thus giving them a completely new function of providing family housing instead of beds for single males — the nature of changes Sandton City underwent were far more superficial. The Langa Dormitories combined rooms and completely renovated the buildings to transform them from prison like cell blocks with nothing more to offer than beds. Sandton City’s developers placed a new facade on its tower so that its older aesthetic wouldn’t remain as a reminder of the fallen apartheid regime. The dormitories in Langa no longer house single male migrant laborers, but instead can now be homes for their families. Sandton City added an Italian piazza, which it then renamed Freedom Square after placing a rather awkward looking statue of Nelson Mandela squarely in the center.2 Like all shopping 1 Jennifer Robinson, The Power of Apartheid: State, Power and Space in South African Cities. (Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 1996), 15. 2 Sarah Nuttall and Joseph-Achille Mbembe, Johannesburg: The Elusive Metropolis, (Durham: Duke University Press, 2008), 300 !4 centers Sandton City relies upon the appeal it holds to the consumers it intends to court. After its various developments, redevelopments, and additions Sandton City’s aesthetic has changed, but not much else. Unlike the dormitories of Langa, Sandton City and the rest of Johannesburg’s built environment have not changed in any considerable ways, because their functions remain the same. Langa’s function was completely rewritten, while Sandton City, and the highway system remain carrying out the same daily functions they had during apartheid. Whereas the Langa townships have undergone extensive and expensive redevelopment efforts, commercial buildings like Sandton City have not. It’s fair to say that the shopping center has attempted an about-face by proudly offering up Nelson Mandela Square and a bolstered transportation circle constructed in partnership with the municipal government. Sandton City has remained inaccessible to very similar portions of the population as was the case under apartheid. Whether or not this is the fault of the private developers or the municipality is a separate topic, but until recently Sandton City has managed to implicitly exclude many of the same people that were disenfranchised under apartheid. Sandton City is also still removed from and therefore inaccessible to the poor, majority black population of Alexandra. Until 2015 there were no plans to allow for greater public access to the mall via municipal transit services, or pedestrian walkways !5 over the M1 highway.3 Largely without the means to purchase automobiles, the inhabitants of Alexandra are left as a pedestrian population, which makes the M1 more of a wall between Sandton City and the outlying slums than a freeway. Additionally, the suburbs surrounding Sandton City have a similar effect acting as obstacles to the movement of pedestrians. Sandton City exemplifies an apartheid era structure that has arguably succeeded at changing its face in tandem with the political system, but has not actively attempted to change the nature of its relationship with the surrounding area and its population. Sandton City still caters to largely the same clientele it had throughout Apartheid. It is still an upscale, regional shopping center that is legally open to all races and ethnicities without actively opening itself physically or economically. While it is the job and indeed the purpose of the national and municipal state to lead the political and social transition from apartheid, it is also the purpose of individual developers and owners to make sure their structures are still viable financial assets. However, by not actively attempting to increase the accessibility of the shopping center to the population of Alexandra, the municipal government of Johannesburg