Kinetics of Ion-Pair Formation on Variable-Charge Minerals Using the Frequency Domain Method

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kinetics of Ion-Pair Formation on Variable-Charge Minerals Using the Frequency Domain Method Soil Chemistry Kinetics of Ion-Pair Formation on Variable-Charge Minerals Using the Frequency Domain Method Predicting nutrient behavior is ever more critical to understanding and management of the environment, Xiufu Shuai* particularly in highly weathered and tropical environments. Th e fate of nutrients in the environment seems heavily Water Resources Research Center infl uenced by the kinetics of ion-pair formation on the surfaces of variable-charge minerals coupled with transport Univ. of Hawaii at Manoa processes. Th e objective of this study was to generate the coupled processes in column experiments and estimate the Honolulu, HI 96822 reaction rates using the frequency domain method. Columns were packed with ground natural minerals (gibbsite, goethite, and hematite). Th e input signals were designed as a sinusoidal change in NaNO3 concentration within Russell S. Yost −1 −1 Dep. of Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences 0.1 and 0.2 mmol L and constant pH 4.0, and the highest frequency of the input signals was 0.714 min . − + Univ. of Hawaii at Manoa Th e input and output signals of NO3 and H concentrations were monitored by ultraviolet–visible light and Honolulu, HI 96822 pH detectors, respectively. A mathematical model was derived to describe the diff usion process of a counterion from aqueous solution to β plane, the recombination–dissociation reaction between a charged surface site and the counterion, and the coupled transport process described by the convection–dispersion equation. Results showed that the output signals were dominated by the designed frequency and thus the coupled processes were linear. Th e + − aqueous H concentration changed linearly with that of the aqueous NO3 concentration. Th e mathematical model fi t the measured transfer function of the processes. Th e estimated rates of recombination of ion pairs were 52.0, 30.5, and 8.0 L mol−1 min−1, and the estimated rates of dissociation of the ion pair were 0.189, 0.256, and 0.285 min−1 for the natural gibbsite, goethite, and hematite, respectively. Abbreviations: CDE, convection–dispersion equation; RA, relative amplitude; TLM, triple-layer model; XRD, x-ray diff raction. inerals with variable surface charge such as gibbsite, goethite, and hematite Mare abundant in soils and important in environmental chemistry, especially in highly weathered soils of the tropics (Uehara and Gillman, 1981). Surface com- plexation models, such as the constant capacitance model (Schindler and Kamber, 1968; Hohl and Stumm, 1976), the diff use layer model (DLM) (Stumm et al., 1970; Huang and Stumm, 1973; Dzombak and Morel, 1990), the triple-layer model (TLM) (Yates et al., 1974; Davis et al., 1978; Hayes et al., 1991), and the charge-distribution multisite complexation (CD-MUSIC) model (Hiemstra et al., 1989a,b, 1996; Hiemstra and Van Riemsdijk, 1996) are being used to describe the surface chemistry of variable-charge colloids. In both the DLM and the TLM, + + − − ions such as Na , K , NO3 , Cl can be nonspecifi cally adsorbed at the electric diff use layer by electrostatic attraction or repulsion. In the TLM, the counterions can be adsorbed at the β plane by ion-pair formation with the charged surface sites. A kinetic study has shown that ion-pair formation on the β plane in the TLM is a physical diff usion process through the electric double layer with a subsequent recombination–dissociation reaction between charged sites on the surface of goe- thite and the counterion on the β plane (Sasaki et al., 1983). Surface reactions are usually coupled with transport processes in chemically and physically heterogeneous soil systems, and thus modeling and parameter esti- Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 74:1568–1576 Published online 3 Aug. 2010 doi:10.2136/sssaj2009.0161 Mention of a specifi c brand of equipment does not imply an endorsement by the University of Hawaii or the authors. Received 28 Apr. 2009. *Corresponding author ([email protected]). © Soil Science Society of America, 5585 Guilford Rd., Madison WI 53711 USA All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher. 1568 SSSAJ: Volume 74: Number 5 • September–October 2010 mation of the coupled processes are important for more realistic sociation reaction. Th e recombination–dissociation reaction of descriptions of the fate of nutrients and contaminants. Th e ki- counterions with charged surface sites to form an ion pair in the netics of ion-pair formation of ions as counterions at the surface β plane is described as of variable-charge soils is very helpful in predicting their mobil- + ⎯⎯kr→ CIββSS←⎯⎯ -CI [2] ity and transport in the environment. Th e kinetic methods used kd to study surface reactions, however, such as the electric fi eld pulse technique (Sasaki et al., 1983) and the pressure-jump method where S and S–CIβ are the concentrations of charged surface (Astumin et al., 1981), cannot be used to study the coupled pro- sites and the ion pair in the β plane, respectively, and kr and kd cesses because the time range of the pressure jump is on a scale are the rates of the recombination and dissociation reactions, re- −5 of 10 s (Sparks, 1989), which is much faster than transport spectively. Typically, all species, CIβ and S–CIβ, in the β plane processes on a scale from minutes to days. Recently, a frequency are considered adsorbed at the surface of minerals. domain method was developed by Shuai and Yost (2007) to Th e intrinsic equilibrium constant of the diff usion process study the transport of inert tracers in columns using the sinu- through the electric double layer is soidal change in tracer concentrations with time as input. Th e ≡ kf K diffusion [3] advantage of this method is that the spectra of the input were of k the widest passband (the portion of a spectrum between limit- b ing frequencies that is transmitted with minimum relative loss Th e intrinsic equilibrium constant of the recombination–disso- or maximum relative gain in a dynamic system) and the high- ciation process of the counterion is est amplitude, which permitted stimulation of the transport k K int ≡ r process and measurements with a maximum signal/noise ratio counterion [4] kd (Shuai and Yost, 2007). Th is method can also be used to measure Transport Process of the coupled surface reactions and transport processes by applying an Convection–Dispersion Equation active tracer of interest to columns in the infl uent solution. Th e frequency domain approach has not been reported in column Th e transport process of the convection–dispersion equa- experiments for the study of the coupled processes of ion-pair tion (CDE) has been widely used to describe transport in soils formation and transport. (Nielsen and Biggar, 1961; Biggar and Nielsen, 1967): Th e objectives of this study were (i) to measure the kinet- ∂∂ccc2 ∂ ics of ion-pair formation at the surfaces of three variable-charge RD=− V [5] ∂∂tzz2 ∂ minerals (natural gibbsite, goethite, and hematite) coupled with a transport process using the frequency domain method, and (ii) where c is the resident concentration of solute, t and z are the to estimate the reaction rates of ion-pair formation at the sur- time and space coordinates, respectively, D is the dispersion coef- faces of the variable-charge minerals. fi cient, V is the pore-water velocity, and R is the retardation fac- tor, which was 1 in this study. MATHEMATICAL MODELS AND For a fi nite system for which the exit boundary condition ALGORITHM FOR PARAMETER ESTIMATION does not aff ect the solute concentration inside the column, the Process of Ion-pair Formation at the Surfaces initial and boundary conditions are of Minerals cz(),0= 0 Th ere are two processes in the mechanism of ion-pair for- ∞= mation at the surface of goethite (Sasaki et al., 1983). Th e fi rst ct(),0 [6] process is diff usion of a counterion from an aqueous phase to the ctut()()0, = β plane in the TLM; the counterion is bound electrostatically to cLt()(), = yt the particle surface but not to any specifi c site. In this study, the physical diff usion process through electrical layers is described as and the transfer function of the CDE to describe the relationship between the input u(t) and the output y(t) is ⎯⎯kf→ CIaq ←⎯⎯ CIβ [1] kb Ys() Gs()≡ Us() where CIaq and CIβ are the concentrations of counterions in [7] aqueous solution and in the β plane and k and k are the for- ⎡⎤LV⎛⎞4 Ds f b =−+exp⎢⎥⎜⎟ 1 1 ward and backward rate constants, respectively, for adsorption ⎣⎦⎢⎥2DV⎝⎠2 and desorption of the counterion through the electrical double layer (Sasaki et al., 1983). where L is the length of the column, Y(s) and U(s) are the Laplace Th e second process is the movement of the counterion in transform of y(t) and u(t), respectively, and s is the Laplace op- the β plane until it fi nds a charged surface site and becomes a erator (s = jω, where j is an imaginary unit and ω is the angular site-bound counterion, which is termed the recombination–dis- frequency) (Jury and Roth, 1990; Shuai and Yost, 2007). SSSAJ: Volume 74: Number 5 • September–October 2010 1569 Mathematical Model for Ion-Pair Formation at ⎡⎤⎛⎞kS⎣⎦⎡⎤ the Surfaces of Minerals Coupled with Transport Hs()=+ s⎢⎥11 K ⎜⎟ +r diffusion ⎜⎟+ [18] ⎢⎥⎝⎠skd Ion-pair formation at the surface of a variable-charge min- ⎣⎦ eral was coupled with transport (the CDE) along the columns.
Recommended publications
  • Trolleite Al4(PO4)3(OH)3 C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
    Trolleite Al4(PO4)3(OH)3 c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Monoclinic. Point Group: 2/m. Lamellar, massive, to 3 cm. Physical Properties: Cleavage: In two directions, indistinct. Fracture: Even to conchoidal. Hardness = 8.5 D(meas.) = 3.10 D(calc.) = 3.08 Optical Properties: Translucent. Color: Pale green to bright blue. Luster: Vitreous. Optical Class: Biaxial (–). Dispersion: r> v,weak. α = 1.619 β = 1.639 γ = 1.643 2V(meas.) = 49◦ Cell Data: Space Group: I2/c. a = 18.894(5) b = 7.161(1) c = 7.162(2) β =99.99(2)◦ Z=4 X-ray Powder Pattern: Champion mine, California, USA. 3.208 (100), 3.095 (90), 3.075 (50), 2.519 (45), 3.336 (40), 6.667 (35), 1.983 (35) Chemistry: (1) (2) (3) P2O5 46.72 48.00 47.97 Al2O3 43.26 43.87 45.94 Fe2O3 2.75 0.34 CaO 0.97 0.02 H2O 6.23 [7.77] 6.09 Total 99.93 [100.00] 100.00 (1) V¨astan˚amine, Sweden. (2) H¨okens˚as, Sweden; by electron microprobe, total Fe as Fe2O3, H2O by difference. (3) Al4(PO4)3(OH)3. Occurrence: In amphibolite-grade metamorphic rocks. Association: Berlinite, attakolite, augelite, lazulite (V¨astan˚amine, Sweden); scorzalite, augelite, vis´eite(Champion mine, California, USA); montebrasite, scorzalite, bertossaite, brazilianite, apatite, gatumbaite, samuelsonite, wyllieite (Buranga pegmatite, Rwanda). Distribution: In Sweden, from the V¨astan˚amine, near N¨asum,Sk˚ane; at H˚alsj¨oberg, V¨armland;from H¨okens˚as,V¨asterg¨otland.In the Buranga pegmatite, Rwanda.
    [Show full text]
  • Llallagua Tin Ore Deposit (Bolivia)
    resources Article Speculations Linking Monazite Compositions to Origin: Llallagua Tin Ore Deposit (Bolivia) Elizabeth J. Catlos * and Nathan R. Miller Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Sta. C9000, EPS 1.130, Austin, TX 78712, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-512-471-4762 Received: 3 May 2017; Accepted: 25 July 2017; Published: 29 July 2017 Abstract: Monazite [(Ce,Th)PO4] from the Llallagua tin ore deposit in Bolivia is characterized by low radiogenic element contents. Previously reported field evidence and mineral associations suggest the mineral formed via direct precipitation from hydrothermal fluids. Monazite compositions thus may provide insight into characteristics of the fluids from which it formed. Chemical compositions of three Llallagua monazite grains were obtained using Electron Probe Microanalysis (EPMA, n = 64) and laser ablation mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS, n = 56). The mineral has higher amounts of U (123 ± 17 ppm) than Th (39 ± 20 ppm) (LA-ICP-MS, ±1σ). Grains have the highest amounts of fluorine ever reported for monazite (0.88 ± 0.10 wt %, EPMA, ±1σ), and F-rich fluids are effective mobilizers of rare earth elements (REEs), Y, and Th. The monazite has high Eu contents and positive Eu anomalies, consistent with formation in a highly-reducing back-arc environment. We speculate that F, Ca, Si and REE may have been supplied via dissolution of pre-existing fluorapatite. Llallagua monazite oscillatory zoning is controlled by an interplay of low (P + Ca + Si + Y) and high atomic number (REE) elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2006 Gems & Gemology Gem News
    EDITOR Brendan M. Laurs ([email protected]) CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Emmanuel Fritsch, IMN, University of Nantes, France ([email protected]) Henry A. Hänni, SSEF, Basel, Switzerland ([email protected]) Franck Notari, Geneva, Switzerland ([email protected]) Kenneth V. G. Scarratt, GIA Research, Bangkok, Thailand ([email protected]) DIAMONDS Angola and the Democratic Republic of Congo. This situ- Update on Diamond Trading in Sierra Leone. During the ation led to the Kimberley Process for certifying dia- decade-long civil war in Sierra Leone, the Revolutionary monds from mine to market, which was implemented in United Front (RUF) rebel army committed widespread 2002. With the signing of the Lomé Peace Agreement atrocities against innocent civilians, drawing global con- between the Sierra Leone government and the RUF earlier demnation by governments, human rights groups, and that year, peace has returned to the country. concerned citizens. The RUF was partially funded by the In August 2006, GIA Education instructor Ric Taylor country’s diamond resources, bringing the issue of con- traveled through the Sierra Leone diamond mining areas of flict diamonds in Sierra Leone to world attention in the Koidu, Tongo, Kenema, and Bo, some of which were once late 1990s. Meanwhile, similar diamond-funded conflicts controlled by the rebels. He saw no evidence of continuing were being waged in other African nations, such as conflict, and residents and journalists in these areas con- firmed that there is no desire to return to war. In the town of Koidu (figure 1), in the diamond mining district of Kono Figure 1. The town of Koidu, in the Kono district of in eastern Sierra Leone, one can still see the bare walls of eastern Sierra Leone, was at the center of the county’s buildings that were looted and burned, but many others protracted conflict because of the area’s diamond have been rebuilt and have roofs of corrugated metal or resources.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mineral Names*,†
    American Mineralogist, Volume 106, pages 1360–1364, 2021 New Mineral Names*,† Dmitriy I. Belakovskiy1, and Yulia Uvarova2 1Fersman Mineralogical Museum, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskiy Prospekt 18 korp. 2, Moscow 119071, Russia 2CSIRO Mineral Resources, ARRC, 26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington, Western Australia 6151, Australia In this issue This New Mineral Names has entries for 11 new species, including 7 minerals of jahnsite group: jahnsite- (NaMnMg), jahnsite-(NaMnMn), jahnsite-(CaMnZn), jahnsite-(MnMnFe), jahnsite-(MnMnMg), jahnsite- (MnMnZn), and whiteite-(MnMnMg); lasnierite, manganflurlite (with a new data for flurlite), tewite, and wumuite. Lasnierite* the LA-ICP-MS analysis, but their concentrations were below detec- B. Rondeau, B. Devouard, D. Jacob, P. Roussel, N. Stephant, C. Boulet, tion limits. The empirical formula is (Ca0.59Sr0.37)Ʃ0.96(Mg1.42Fe0.54)Ʃ1.96 V. Mollé, M. Corre, E. Fritsch, C. Ferraris, and G.C. Parodi (2019) Al0.87(P2.99Si0.01)Ʃ3.00(O11.41F0.59)Ʃ12 based on 12 (O+F) pfu. The strongest lines of the calculated powder X-ray diffraction pattern are [dcalc Å (I%calc; Lasnierite, (Ca,Sr)(Mg,Fe)2Al(PO4)3, a new phosphate accompany- ing lazulite from Mt. Ibity, Madagascar: an example of structural hkl)]: 4.421 (83; 040), 3.802 (63, 131), 3.706 (100; 022), 3.305 (99; 141), characterization from dynamic refinement of precession electron 2.890 (90; 211), 2.781 (69; 221), 2.772 (67; 061), 2.601 (97; 023). It diffraction data on submicrometer sample. European Journal of was not possible to perform powder nor single-crystal X-ray diffraction Mineralogy, 31(2), 379–388.
    [Show full text]
  • Lehigh Preserve Institutional Repository
    Lehigh Preserve Institutional Repository An experimental determination of the stability and thermochemical properties of the mineral trolleite. Bass, Jay David 1977 Find more at https://preserve.lib.lehigh.edu/ This document is brought to you for free and open access by Lehigh Preserve. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of Lehigh Preserve. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION OF THE STABILITY AND THERMOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE MINERAL TROLLEITE by Jay David Bass A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Committee of Lehigh University in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Science in Geological Sciences Lehigh University 1977 ProQuest Number: EP76368 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest EP76368 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 This thesis is accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. d/^ii^ / / / / Professor in Charge Chairman of Department 11 Acknowledgments I would like to thank Dr. C. B. Sclar for proposing the problem discussed in this thesis and for his continual encour- agement and inspiration during the completion of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Abstract
    Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter I Description of the tropical forest of Puerto Rico ............................................................ 5 1.1 Geologic setting of the study area ......................................................................................... 5 1.2 The El Yunque National Forest ............................................................................................... 8 1.3 Distribution of Temperature and Precipitation ..................................................................... 8 1.4 Soil types in the El Yunque National Forest ......................................................................... 11 Chapter II Field and laboratory work ............................................................................................ 13 Chapter III Polymorphism in kaolinite ........................................................................................... 17 Chapter IV Result and Discussion .................................................................................................. 22 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................... 45 References ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE of AUGELITE An.Trr, Deportment of Geology Ond Geophys'ics, Uni,Aersity O1 Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minmesot
    THE AMERICAN MINERALOGIST, VOL. 53, JULY_AUGUS'I, 1968 THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF AUGELITE 'r.An.trr, Deportmentof Geologyond Geophys'ics,Uni,aersity o1Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minmesota J.J.FtNNev,Department oJ Geology, Colorado School oJ Mines, Golden, Colorad,o AND '1. Zorrx, Department of Geology and. Geophysics, Llnirersitt o;f M innesota, M i,nneab olis, M innes ota. Aesrnncr An augelite, Al:(POr) (OH),,, from Mono County, California, has unit cell o:13.124 +0.006.b:7988+0.005,c:5.066+0.0C8]\,8:112.25+0.02'anditsspacegroul>isC2/ ru, in agreementwith Peacock and Moddle (1941). Patterson maps were calcuJatedtrom three-dimensional intensities and solved by the minimum function method. The structure rvas refined by a sequence of Fourier syntheses and least-squarestechniques to an R value of 6.6 percent for all and 5 0 percent for all but the eight strongest reflections. Al has two drfferent coordinations in this structure. One is coordinated to four OH and trvo O and the other fo three OH and two O. The P atom is coordinated to four O. Four Al polyhedra, two of each t),pe, are linked together by sharing OH-OH edges. These groups in turn are connected to P-tetrahedra sharing corner O atoms. ExprntlrnNIAL PRocEDURE A cleavage fragment from a large crystal from Mono County, California, measttring 0.65,0.65 and 1.0 mm along the a-,b- and c-axes respectively, was mounted on the goni- ometer with the c-axis as rotation axis. The precession photographs ofiered a choice between the pseudoorthorhombic body centeredunitcellwitho:12 14+0.02,b:7.98+O.02,c:5.07+0.024and9:903+0.1' and the monoclinic C-centeredunit cell with o:13.13+0.02, b:7.98+0.02, c:5.07+ 0.02 A and B:112.4+0.15" These cell parameters were refined from powder diffractometry data with least-squarestechniques and the following parameters rvere obtained for the C-centeredmonoclinic unit cell:a: 13.124+O006 A, b:7.988 + 0.005A,c:5.066+ 0 003 A, 9:11225+O.O2",2:4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Piriá Aluminous Lateritic Profile: Mineralogy, Geochemistry and Parent Rock O Perfil Laterítico Aluminoso Do Piriá: Mineralogia, Geoquímica E Rocha Mãe
    DOI: 10.1590/2317-4889201620160101 ARTICLE The Piriá aluminous lateritic profile: mineralogy, geochemistry and parent rock O perfil laterítico aluminoso do Piriá: mineralogia, geoquímica e rocha mãe Pabllo Henrique Costa dos Santos1*, Marcondes Lima da Costa2, Alessandro Sabá Leite3 ABSTRACT: Relatively small aluminous lateritic deposits are abundant RESUMO: Depósitos lateríticos de pequeno porte são frequentes no in the northeast and northwest parts of the Pará and Maranhão states, nordeste do Pará e noroeste do Maranhão. A maioria está mineralizada respectively. Most of them hosts aluminum phosphate mineralization for- em fosfatos de alumínio e ocorre em morros e platôs, que se destacam na ming hills and plateaus that stand out in the topography of the undulating planície rebaixada dessa região. A Serra do Piriá é uma dessas feições, plains of this region. The Piriá ridge is one of those topographic features, estando recoberta por couraças ferruginosas, alvo de explotação na década covered by lateritic iron crusts that have been studied in the 1970s as part de 1970 e de recente prospecção de fosfatos. Este trabalho buscou aprofun- of iron ore exploration campaigns and recently for phosphates prospec- dar o conhecimento sobre a evolução laterítica do depósito Piriá e demon- tion. This study improves the knowledge about the evolution of the late- strar sua compatibilidade com os lateritos mais evoluídos da Amazônia, ritic Piriá deposit and demonstrates its relationship with the most evolved conhecidos como maturos, os quais constituem grandes mineralizações laterites of the Amazon, known as mature laterites, which formed major formadas durante o paleógeno. Investigaram-se amostras de um furo de ore deposits during the Paleogene.
    [Show full text]
  • Phosphate Minerals from the Nanping Pegmatite, SE China
    Granitic Pegmatites: The State of the Art – International Symposium. 06th – 12th May 2007, Porto, Portugal. Phosphate minerals from the Nanping pegmatite, SE China 1 1 2 3 4 HUAN HU , RUCHENG WANG , FRANÇOIS FONTAN , AICHENG ZHANG & JIADENG CHEN 1 State Key Laboratory for Mineral Deposits Research, Department of Earth Sciences, Nanjing University, [email protected] 2LMTG UMR 5563, Observatoire Midi Pyrénées, 14 Av. E. Belin, F-31400 Toulouse, France 3Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese academy of sciences, Nanjing 4The Bureau of Land and Resources of Nanping, Fujian Province, Nanping ABSTRACT Nanping pegmatite has complex associations of phosphates. This pegmatite shows complete evolution zones from the border to inner. Phosphate minerals could be divided into primary and secondary type. The formation of phosphates suggests Mg, Fe, Ba, Sr become more abundant during the evolution processes of granitic pegmatite. Keywords: Phosphates, pegmatite, Nanping, China. INTRODUCTION numerous and all closely associated with primary apatite and montebrasite. Palermoite is observed as Nanping pegmatite is located in Fujian Province, SE replacement of primary montebrasite. It is associated China. This rare-element pegmatite is actually exploited with kulanite. Bertossaite is another secondary mineral for tantalum, lithium and beryllium. of strontium, but it formed after augelite, and is A complete internal zoning is observed, and includes, associated with lazulite and goyazite. from border to core, (I) quartz-albite-muscovite zone, Based on phosphate association, the alteration sequence (II) green-color mica zone, (III) quartz-muscovite zone, of phosphate minerals can be established in Figure 1. (IV) quartz-albite zone, (V) quartz-spodumene-micro- cline-cleavelandite zone, (VI) quartz-spodumene- TABLE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • AUGELITE from MONO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Dwrcnr M. Lbulron, Stanford, Llniaersity, California
    AUGELITE FROM MONO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Dwrcnr M. LBulroN, Stanford, Llniaersity, California. Augelite, basic aluminum phosphate, was discovered in the andalusite orebody of the l\{ono County Mine of Champion Sil- linranite, Inc., during the summer oI 1934 by the writer while en- gagedin a field study of the geology and mineralogy of the deposit, and was subsequently identified in the mineralogy laboratory at Stanford University. The andalusite mine is located on the west slope of White Mountain in California, and was briefly described by P. F. Kerr' in 1932. DnscnrprroN ol MoNo CouNrv AucBr-rrp The augelite occurs in white, colorless,to yellowish cleavable masses. In the largest specimen found individual cleavages can be traced for over two inches although part of this distance repre- sents an intergrowth of augelite with other mineralsl other speci- mens are smaller, grading down to microscopicdimensions. The luster is vitreous. Cleavageis perfect parallel to the prism mlII0l in two directionsat anglesof about 67oand 113o,and lessperfect in a third direction parallel to the dome 11101f at an angle of 77|" to the prism. Figure 1 showsthe plan and clinographicpro- jection of a cleavablemass of augelite. In constructing the clino- graphic projection, the plan has beenrotated through the custom- ary angle, l8o 26'; the unusual foreshorteningof the prism face is causedby the fact that in the axial ratio of augelite, o is greater than 6. Cleavage angles of augelite from this new locality measured on the reflection goniometer average for the prism cleavage mm(110n110) 66" 57'as comparedwith the value of 66" 46're- cordedby Prior and Spencer;2for the anglebetween the prism and dome mx(ll0 n 101), 77" 43' as comparedwith the recordedvalue oI 77" 35'.
    [Show full text]
  • AFMS Mineral List 2003
    American Federation Of Mineralogical Societies AFMS Mineral Classification List New Edition Updated for 2003 AFMS Publications Committee B. Jay Bowman, Chair 1 Internet version of Mineral Classification List. This document may only be downloaded at: http://www.amfed.org/rules/ Introduction to the Mineral Classification List The AFMS Rules Committee voted to eliminate the listing in the Rulebook of references for mineral names except for the AFMS Mineral Classification List. Exhibitors are encouraged to use the AFMS List when exhibiting in the B Division (Minerals). If the mineral they are exhibiting is not on the AFMS List they should note on the Mineral list they present to the judging chairman which reference they did use for the information on their label. The Regional Rules Chairs have been asked to submit names to be added to the list which will be updated with addendum’s each year. In a few years the list should represent most of the minerals generally exhibited out of the 4200+ now recognized by the IMA. This list follows the Glossary of Mineral species which is the IMA approved names for minerals. When the Official name of the mineral includes diacritical mark, they are underlined to indicate they are the IMA approved name. Where usage of old names has been in use for years they have been included, but with the approved spelling underlined following it. The older spelling will be accepted for the present so exhibitors will not have to correct there present label. This list may not contain all mineral species being exhibited. Exhibitors are encouraged to submit names to be added to the list to the Rules committee.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Mineral Symbols
    THE CANADIAN MINERALOGIST LIST OF SYMBOLS FOR ROCK- AND ORE-FORMING MINERALS (January 1, 2021) ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ac acanthite Ado andorite Asp aspidolite Btr berthierite Act actinolite Adr andradite Ast astrophyllite Brl beryl Ae aegirine Ang angelaite At atokite Bll beryllonite AeAu aegirine-augite Agl anglesite Au gold Brz berzelianite Aen aenigmatite Anh anhydrite Aul augelite Bet betafite Aes aeschynite-(Y) Ani anilite Aug augite Bkh betekhtinite Aik aikinite Ank ankerite Aur auricupride Bdt beudantite Akg akaganeite Ann annite Aus aurostibite Beu beusite Ak åkermanite An anorthite Aut autunite Bch bicchulite Ala alabandite Anr anorthoclase Aw awaruite Bt biotite* Ab albite Atg antigorite Axn axinite-(Mn) Bsm bismite Alg algodonite Sb antimony Azu azurite Bi bismuth All allactite Ath anthophyllite Bdl baddeleyite Bmt bismuthinite Aln allanite Ap apatite* Bns banalsite Bod bohdanowiczite Alo alloclasite Arg aragonite Bbs barbosalite Bhm böhmite Ald alluaudite Ara aramayoite Brr barrerite Bor boralsilite Alm almandine Arf arfvedsonite Brs barroisite Bn bornite Alr almarudite Ard argentodufrénoysite Blt barylite Bou boulangerite Als alstonite Apn argentopentlandite Bsl barysilite Bnn bournonite Alt altaite Arp argentopyrite Brt baryte, barite Bow bowieite Aln alunite Agt argutite Bcl barytocalcite Brg braggite Alu alunogen Agy argyrodite Bss bassanite Brn brannerite Amb amblygonite Arm armangite Bsn bastnäsite Bra brannockite Ams amesite As arsenic
    [Show full text]