(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9.273,100 B2 Hallen-Adams Et Al

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9.273,100 B2 Hallen-Adams Et Al US009273 100B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9.273,100 B2 Hallen-Adams et al. (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 1, 2016 (54) USE OF GALERINA MARGINATA GENES AND “U.S. Appl. No. 12/268,229, Final Office Action mailed Feb. 28, PROTEINS FOR PEPTIDE PRODUCTION 2013', 7 pgs. “U.S. Appl. No. 12/268,229. Final Office Action mailed Apr. 4. 2012”, 8 pgs. (75) Inventors: Heather E. Hallen-Adams, Lincoln, NE “U.S. Appl. No. 12/268,229. Non Final Office Action mailed Jul 16, (US); John S. Scott-Craig, East 2012', 9 pgs. Lansing, MI (US); Jonathan D. Walton, “U.S. Appl. No. 12/268,229. Non Final Office Action mailed Jul 22, East Lansing, MI (US); Hong Luo, 2011”, 13 pgs. Lansing, MI (US) “U.S. Appl. No. 12/268,229. Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 21, 2010”, 13 pgs. (73) Assignee: Board of Trustees of Michigan State “U.S. Appl. No. 12/268,229. Preliminary Amendment filed Jun. 10, University, East Lansing, MI (US) 2009, 16 pgs. “U.S. Appl. No. 12/268,229, Response filed May 24, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Feb. 28, 2013”, 6 pgs. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this “U.S. Appl. No. 12/268,229. Response filed May 27, 2011 to Supple patent is extended or adjusted under 35 mental Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 27, 2010”, 31 pgs. U.S.C. 154(b) by 105 days. “U.S. Appl. No. 12/268,229. Response filed Jun. 4, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 4, 2012, 13 pgs. (21) Appl. No.: 13/362,561 “U.S. Appl. No. 12/268,229, Response filed Jun. 25, 2012 to Advi sory Action mailed Jun. 13, 2012 and to Final Office Action mailed (22) Filed: Jan. 31, 2012 Apr. 4, 2012, 15 pgs. “U.S. Appl. No. 12/268,229, Response filed Oct. 18, 2010 to Restric (65) Prior Publication Data tion Requirement mailed Sep. 16, 2010”. 1 pg. “U.S. Appl. No. 12/268,229, Response filed Nov. 16, 2012 to Non US 2012/O276588A1 Nov. 1, 2012 Final Office Action mailed Jul. 16, 2012', 12 pgs. “U.S. Appl. No. 12/268,229, Response filed Dec. 22, 2011 to Non Related U.S. Application Data Final Office Action mailed Jul. 22, 2011”, 13 pgs. “U.S. Appl. No. 12/268,229. Restriction Requirement mailed Sep. (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 12/268,229. 16, 2010”, 7 pgs. filed on Nov. 10, 2008. “U.S. Appl. No. 12/268,229, Supplemental Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 27, 2010”, 14pgs. (60) Provisional application No. 61/002,650, filed on Nov. “Machine Translation of CN1341362, obtained on Dec. 21, 2010’, 7 9, 2007. OgS. Ahn, J. H., et al., “An Extended Physical Map of the TOX2 Locus of (51) Int. Cl. Cochliobolus carbonum Required for Biosynthesis of HC-Toxin'. CI2N 9/48 (2006.01) Fungal Genet. Biol. 35(1), (2002), 31-38. CI2N L/20 (2006.01) Alves, A.M. C. R. et al., “Highly Efficient Production of Laccase by CI2O I/68 (2006.01) the Basidiomycete Pycnoportis cinnabarintis',s Appl. Environ. C07K L/00 (2006.01) Microbiol., 70(11). (2004), 6379-6384. C07K 7/64 (2006.01) Bamburg, J. R., “Proteins of the ADF/cofilin family: essential regu lators of actin dynamics.”. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 15, (1999), C07K I4/375 (2006.01) 185-230. (52) U.S. Cl. Benedict, R. G., et al., "Fermentative Production of Amanita Toxins CPC ................. C07K 7/64 (2013.01); C07K 14/375 by a Strain of Galerina marginata", J. Bacteriol. 91(3), (1966), (2013.01) 1380-1381. (58) Field of Classification Search Beutler, J. A., et al., "Chemical Variation in Amanita', J. Nat. Prod, USPC .................. 536/23.2; 435/6, 212, 6.1, 252.31 44(4), (1981), 422-431. See application file for complete search history. Brandt, I., et al., “Suggested functions for prolyl oligopeptidase: A puzzling paradox”. Clin. Chim Acta, 377(1-2), (2007), 50-61. (56) References Cited (Continued) U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS Primary Examiner — Maryam Monshipouri 4,683, 195 A 7, 1987 Mullis et al. (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Schwegman Lundberg & 4,683.202 A 7, 1987 Mullis Woessner, P.A. 4,965,188 A 10, 1990 Mullis et al. 5,928,906 A 7, 1999 Koster et al. (57) ABSTRACT 2001 OO14445 A1 8, 2001 Urnovitz 2004/0081978 A1 4/2004 Ziman et al. The present invention relates to compositions and methods 2005/0255486 A1 11/2005 Behlke et al. comprising genes and peptides associated with cyclic pep 2006/0141495 A1 6, 2006 Wu 2008/0076677 A1 3/2008 Yershov et al. tides and cyclic peptide production in mushrooms. In particu 2009/0093620 A1 4/2009 Kovalic et al. lar, the present invention relates to using genes and proteins 2010/0267,019 A1 10/2010 Hallen et al. from Galerina species encoding peptides specifically relating to amatoxins in addition to proteins involved with processing FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS cyclic peptide toxins. In a preferred embodiment, the present invention also relates to methods for making Small peptides CN 1341362 A 3, 2002 and Small cyclic peptides including peptides similar to aman OTHER PUBLICATIONS itin. Further, the present inventions relate to providing kits for making Small peptides. “U.S. Appl. No. 12/268,229, Advisory Action mailed Jun. 13, 2012”. 3 pgs. 16 Claims, 79 Drawing Sheets US 9.273,100 B2 Page 2 (56) References Cited Letschert, K., et al., “Molecular Characterization and Inhibition of Amanitin Uptake into Human Hepatocytes.”. Toxicol Sci., 91(1), OTHER PUBLICATIONS (2006), 140-149. Bulaj. G. et al., “Efficient oxidative folding of conotoxins and the Lindell, T.J., et al., “Specific Inhibition of Nuclear RNA Polymerase radiation of venomous cone snails'. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100 II by O-Amanitin”, Science, 170(3959), (1970), 447-449. Lugones, L. G., et al., “Introns are necessary for mRNA accumula 2), (2003), 14562-14568. tion in Schizophyilurn commune', Mol. Microbiol. 32(4), (1999), Bushnell, D.A., et al., “Structural basis of transcription: O-Amanitin 681-700. RNA polymerase II cocrystal at 2.8 A resolution”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Malonek, S., et al., “Functional Characterization of Two Cytochrome Sci. USA,99(3), (2002), 1218-1222. P450 Monooxygenase Genes, P450-1 and P450-4, of the Gibberellic Butera, R., et al., “Diagnostic accuracy of urinary amanitin in Sus acid Gene Cluster in Fusarium proliferatum (Gibberellafiujikuroi pected mushroom poisoning: a pilot study’. Clinical Toxicology, MP-D)”, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71(3), (2005), 1462-1472. 42(6). (2004), 901-912. Maniatis, T., et al., “Regulation of Inducible and Tissue-Specific Craik. D. J., “Chemistry. Seamless Proteins Tie Up Their Loose Gene Expression”, Science, 236(4806), (1987), 1237-1245. Ends', Science, 311(5767), (2006), 1563-1564. Marqulies, M., et al., “Genome Sequencing in Microfabricated High Craik. D. J., et al., “The chemistry and biology of cyclotides'. Curr: Density Picolitre Reactors', Nature, 437(7057), (2005), 376-380. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel., 10(2), (2007), 176-184. May, J. P. et al., “Tryptathionine Bridges in Peptide Synthesis'. Crooks, G. E., et al., “WebLogo: A Sequence Logo Generator'. Biopolymers, 88(5), (2007), 714-724. Genome Res, 4(6), (2004), 1188-1190. Muraoka, S., et al., “Detection and Identification of Amanitins in the Cunningham, D. F., et al., “Proline specific peptidases”. Biochim Wood-Rotting Fungi Galerina fasciculata and Galerina Biophy's Acta, 1343(2), (1997), 160-186. helvoliceps, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65(9), (1999), 4207-4210. Duquesne, S., et al., “Two Enzymes Catalyze the Maturation of a Muraoka, S., et al., “Effective Production of Amanitins by Two-Step Lasso Peptide in Escherichia coli'', Chem. Biol., 14(7), (2007), 793 Cultivation of the Basidiomycete, Galerina fasciculata GF-060". J. 803. Biosci. Bioeng, 89(1), (2000), 73-76. Nikolskaya, A. N., et al., “Identification of peptide synthetase-encod Enjalbert. F., et al., “Treatment of Amatoxin Poisoning: 20-Year ing genes from filamentous fungi producing host-selective Retrospective Analysis, review of poisonings.”. J. Toxicol. Clin. phytotoxins or analogs”. Gene, 165(2), (1995), 207-211. Toxicol., 40(6), (2002), 715-757. Novick, R. P. et al., “Quorum Sensing in Staphylococci'. Annu. Rev. Escoubas, P. “Molecular diversification in spider venoms: A web of Genet., 42, (2008), 541-564. combinatorial peptide libraries.”. Mol. Divers., 10(4), (2006), 545 Olivera, B. M.. “Conus Peptides: Biodiversity-based Discovery and 554. Exogenomics”. J. Biol. Chern., 281, (2006), 31173-3 1177. Finking, R. et al., “Biosynthesis of Nonribosomal Peptides'. Annu. Panaccione, D. G., “Multiple families of peptide synthetase genes Rev. Microbiol. 58, (2004), 453-488 from ergopeptine-producing fungi'. Mycological Research, 100(4), Frohman, M. A., et al., “Rapid Production of Full-Length cDNAs (1996), 429-436. from Rare Transcripts: Amplification Using a Single Gene-Specific Panaro. F., et al., “Liver transplantation represents the optimal treat Oligonucleotide Primer'. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85(23), ment for fulminant hepatic failure from Amanita phalloides poison (1988), 8998-9002. ing”. Transplant International, 19(4), (2006), 344-345. Garcia-Horsman, J. A., et al., “Deficient activity of mammalian Polgár, L., “The prolyl oligopeptidase family”. Cell. Mol. Life Sci., prolyl oligopeptidase on the immunoactive peptide digestion in 59(2), (2002), 349-362. coeliac disease'. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 42(5), (2007), 562-571. Richter, K., et al., “cDNAs encoding D-Aladeltorphin precursors Gardiner, D. M., et al., “The sirodesmin biosynthetic gene cluster from skin of Phyliomedusa bicolor also contain genetic information ofthe plant pathogenic fungus Leptosphaeria maculans', Mol. for three dermorphin-related opioid peptides'. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. Microbiol. 53(5), (2004), 1307-1318. USA, 87(10), (1990), 4836-4839.
Recommended publications
  • Field Guide to Common Macrofungi in Eastern Forests and Their Ecosystem Functions
    United States Department of Field Guide to Agriculture Common Macrofungi Forest Service in Eastern Forests Northern Research Station and Their Ecosystem General Technical Report NRS-79 Functions Michael E. Ostry Neil A. Anderson Joseph G. O’Brien Cover Photos Front: Morel, Morchella esculenta. Photo by Neil A. Anderson, University of Minnesota. Back: Bear’s Head Tooth, Hericium coralloides. Photo by Michael E. Ostry, U.S. Forest Service. The Authors MICHAEL E. OSTRY, research plant pathologist, U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station, St. Paul, MN NEIL A. ANDERSON, professor emeritus, University of Minnesota, Department of Plant Pathology, St. Paul, MN JOSEPH G. O’BRIEN, plant pathologist, U.S. Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, St. Paul, MN Manuscript received for publication 23 April 2010 Published by: For additional copies: U.S. FOREST SERVICE U.S. Forest Service 11 CAMPUS BLVD SUITE 200 Publications Distribution NEWTOWN SQUARE PA 19073 359 Main Road Delaware, OH 43015-8640 April 2011 Fax: (740)368-0152 Visit our homepage at: http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/ CONTENTS Introduction: About this Guide 1 Mushroom Basics 2 Aspen-Birch Ecosystem Mycorrhizal On the ground associated with tree roots Fly Agaric Amanita muscaria 8 Destroying Angel Amanita virosa, A. verna, A. bisporigera 9 The Omnipresent Laccaria Laccaria bicolor 10 Aspen Bolete Leccinum aurantiacum, L. insigne 11 Birch Bolete Leccinum scabrum 12 Saprophytic Litter and Wood Decay On wood Oyster Mushroom Pleurotus populinus (P. ostreatus) 13 Artist’s Conk Ganoderma applanatum
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Fungi in Ireland
    FOREST FUNGI IN IRELAND PAUL DOWDING and LOUIS SMITH COFORD, National Council for Forest Research and Development Arena House Arena Road Sandyford Dublin 18 Ireland Tel: + 353 1 2130725 Fax: + 353 1 2130611 © COFORD 2008 First published in 2008 by COFORD, National Council for Forest Research and Development, Dublin, Ireland. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, or stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying recording or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from COFORD. All photographs and illustrations are the copyright of the authors unless otherwise indicated. ISBN 1 902696 62 X Title: Forest fungi in Ireland. Authors: Paul Dowding and Louis Smith Citation: Dowding, P. and Smith, L. 2008. Forest fungi in Ireland. COFORD, Dublin. The views and opinions expressed in this publication belong to the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect those of COFORD. i CONTENTS Foreword..................................................................................................................v Réamhfhocal...........................................................................................................vi Preface ....................................................................................................................vii Réamhrá................................................................................................................viii Acknowledgements...............................................................................................ix
    [Show full text]
  • Toxic Fungi of Western North America
    Toxic Fungi of Western North America by Thomas J. Duffy, MD Published by MykoWeb (www.mykoweb.com) March, 2008 (Web) August, 2008 (PDF) 2 Toxic Fungi of Western North America Copyright © 2008 by Thomas J. Duffy & Michael G. Wood Toxic Fungi of Western North America 3 Contents Introductory Material ........................................................................................... 7 Dedication ............................................................................................................... 7 Preface .................................................................................................................... 7 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................. 7 An Introduction to Mushrooms & Mushroom Poisoning .............................. 9 Introduction and collection of specimens .............................................................. 9 General overview of mushroom poisonings ......................................................... 10 Ecology and general anatomy of fungi ................................................................ 11 Description and habitat of Amanita phalloides and Amanita ocreata .............. 14 History of Amanita ocreata and Amanita phalloides in the West ..................... 18 The classical history of Amanita phalloides and related species ....................... 20 Mushroom poisoning case registry ...................................................................... 21 “Look-Alike” mushrooms .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mushrooms on Stamps
    Mushrooms On Stamps Paul J. Brach Scientific Name Edibility Page(s) Amanita gemmata Poisonous 3 Amanita inaurata Not Recommended 4-5 Amanita muscaria v. formosa Poisonous (hallucenogenic) 6 Amanita pantherina Deadly Poisonous 7 Amanita phalloides Deadly Poisonous 8 Amanita rubescens Not Recommended 9-11 Amanita virosa Deadly Poisonous 12-14 Aleuria aurantiaca Edible 15 Sarcocypha coccinea Edible 16 Phlogiotis helvelloides Edible 17 Leccinum aurantiacum Good Edible 18 Boletus parasiticus Not Recommended 19 For this presentation I chose the species for Cantharellus cibarius Choice Edible 20 their occurrence in our 5 county region Cantharellus cinnabarinus Choice Edible 21 Coprinus atramentarius Poisonous 22 surrounding Rochester, NY. My intent is to Coprinus comatus Choice Edible 23 show our stamp collecting audience that an Coprinus disseminatus Edible 24 Clavulinopsis fusiformis Edible 25 artist's rendition of a fungi species depicted Leotia viscosa Harmless 26 on a stamp could be used akin to a Langermannia gigantea Choice Edible 27 Lycoperdon perlatum Good Edible 28-29 guidebook for the study of mushrooms. Entoloma murraii Not Recommended 30 Most pages depict a photograph and related Morchella esculenta Choice Edible 31-32 Russula rosacea Not Recommended (bitter) 33 stamp of the species, along with an edibility Laetiporus sulphureus Choice Edible 34 icon. Enjoy… but just the edible ones! Polyporus squamosus Edible 35 Choice/Good Edible Harmless Not Recommended Poisonous Deadly Poisonous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Amanita rubescens (blusher) 9 10
    [Show full text]
  • How to Distinguish Amanita Smithiana from Matsutake and Catathelasma Species
    VOLUME 57: 1 JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2017 www.namyco.org How to Distinguish Amanita smithiana from Matsutake and Catathelasma species By Michael W. Beug: Chair, NAMA Toxicology Committee A recent rash of mushroom poisonings involving liver failure in Oregon prompted Michael Beug to issue the following photos and information on distinguishing the differences between the toxic Amanita smithiana and edible Matsutake and Catathelasma. Distinguishing the choice edible Amanita smithiana Amanita smithiana Matsutake (Tricholoma magnivelare) from the highly poisonous Amanita smithiana is best done by laying the stipe (stem) of the mushroom in the palm of your hand and then squeezing down on the stipe with your thumb, applying as much pressure as you can. Amanita smithiana is very firm but if you squeeze hard, the stipe will shatter. Matsutake The stipe of the Matsutake is much denser and will not shatter (unless it is riddled with insect larvae and is no longer in good edible condition). There are other important differences. The flesh of Matsutake peels or shreds like string cheese. Also, the stipe of the Matsutake is widest near the gills Matsutake and tapers gradually to a point while the stipe of Amanita smithiana tends to be bulbous and is usually widest right at ground level. The partial veil and ring of a Matsutake is membranous while the partial veil and ring of Amanita smithiana is powdery and readily flocculates into small pieces (often disappearing entirely). For most people the difference in odor is very distinctive. Most collections of Amanita smithiana have a bleach-like odor while Matsutake has a distinctive smell of old gym socks and cinnamon redhots (however, not all people can distinguish the odors).
    [Show full text]
  • New Species of Amanita Subgen. Lepidella from Guyana
    VOLUME 3 JUNE 2019 Fungal Systematics and Evolution PAGES 1–12 doi.org/10.3114/fuse.2019.03.01 New species of Amanita subgen. Lepidella from Guyana K.S. Mighell1, T.W. Henkel1*, R.A. Koch2, A. Goss1, M.C. Aime2 1Department of Biological Sciences, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 95521, USA 2Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA *Corresponding author: [email protected] Key words: Abstract: New species of Amanita subgen. Lepidella are described from Guyana. Amanita cyanochlorinosma sp. ectomycorrhizal fungi nov., Amanita fulvoalba sp. nov., and Amanita guyanensis sp. nov. represent the latest additions to the growing Guiana Shield body of newly described ectomycorrhizal fungi native to Dicymbe-dominated tropical rainforests. Macro- and monodominant forests micromorphological characters, habitat, and DNA sequence data for the ITS, nrLSU, rpb2, and ef1-α are provided Neotropics for each taxon, and b-tubulin for most. Distinctive morphological features warrant the recognition of the three new new taxa species and a molecular phylogenetic analysis of taxa acrossAmanita subgen. Lepidella corroborates their infrageneric systematics placements. taxonomy Effectively published online: 28 November 2018. INTRODUCTION from the tropics (Thongbai et al. 2016). Tropical Amanita species frequently occur in spatially restricted mono- or co-dominant Amanita (Amanitaceae, Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota) is a stands of ECM host trees, and thus appear to have smaller Editor-in-Chief monophyleticProf. dr P.W. Crous, Westerdijk mushroom Fungal Biodiversity genus Institute, with P.O. cosmopolitan Box 85167, 3508 AD Utrecht, distribution The Netherlands. geographic ranges. They can, however, be a major component E-mail: [email protected] (Drehmel et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Scleroderma Citrinum
    1) Common Earthball (Scleroderma citrinum) sometimes known pigskin poison puffball, is the most common species of earthball in the UK and occurs widely in woods, heathland and in short grass from autumn to winter. It superficially looks like the edible puff ball, but the Earthball is poisonous, but not fiercely so, nevertheless it is inedible and should be avoided. _____________________________________________________________________________________ 2) Birch Polypore. Piptoporus betulinus, commonly known as the birch polypore, birch bracket, or razor strop, is one of the most common polyporous bracket fungi and, as the name suggests, grows almost exclusively on birch trees. The brackets burst out from the bark of the tree, and these fruiting bodies can last for more than a year. It has been known to kill birch trees as well. Technically, it is an edible mushroom, with a strong, pleasant "mushroomy" odour, but a bitter taste. The velvety cut surface of the fruiting body was traditionally used as a strop for finishing the finest of edges on razors. It is also said to have medicinal properties. It has been shown to have anti-inflammatory, anti-bacterial and anti-septic properties which have been known since ancient times. _____________________________________________________________________________________ 3) Spotted Toughshank (Rhodocollybia maculate) . This fungus is generally quite widespread in deciduous and sometimes coniferous woodland, generally hiding under bracken. Fruiting in the late summer to early autumn.. Inedible due to its toughness and bitter taste. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4) Ochre Brittlegill (Russula ochroleuca). for many years commonly referred to as the Common Yellow Russula - is found in all kinds of woodland from mid summer through to early winter.
    [Show full text]
  • Universite Du Quebec Memoire Presente a L'universite Du
    UNIVERSITE DU QUEBEC MEMOIRE PRESENTE A L'UNIVERSITE DU QUEBEC A TROIS-RIVIERES COMME EXIGENCE PARTIELLE DE LA MATTRISE EN SCIENCES DE L'ENVIRONNEMENT PAR MARC BROSSEAU B. Sc. ( BIOCHIMIE ETUDE DE LA TOXICITE -ET DU CONTENU EN TOXINES DE CERTAINS CHM1PIGNONS DU QUEBEC DU GENRE AMANITA AOOT 1982 Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières Service de la bibliothèque Avertissement L’auteur de ce mémoire ou de cette thèse a autorisé l’Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières à diffuser, à des fins non lucratives, une copie de son mémoire ou de sa thèse. Cette diffusion n’entraîne pas une renonciation de la part de l’auteur à ses droits de propriété intellectuelle, incluant le droit d’auteur, sur ce mémoire ou cette thèse. Notamment, la reproduction ou la publication de la totalité ou d’une partie importante de ce mémoire ou de cette thèse requiert son autorisation. i TABLE DES MATIERES Page TABLE DES MATIERES i LISTE DES FIGURES i i i LISTE DES TABLEAUX v REMERCIEMENTS vi RESUME vii Section 1- INTRODUCTION 11- LITTERATURE 5 1- Enoncé du problème 5 2- Toxicité de l 'Amanita phallo~des et de ses 8 toxines 2.1- L' Amanita phallo~des 8 2.2- Les phallotoxines 9 2.3- Les amatoxines 15 3- Extraction des toxines de l 1 Amanita phalloides 17 4- Structure et toxicité des toxines 18 5- Protection de l'actine par la phalloïdine 22 contre l 'action protéolytique de la pronase 6- Objectifs 27 III- MATERIEL ET METHODES 28 1- Matériel 28 2- Méthodes 30 2.1- Récolte et identification des champi- 30 gnons 2.2- Extraction de toxines 31 2.3- Toxicité chez les souris
    [Show full text]
  • Macro and Trace Mineral Constituents and Radionuclides in Mushrooms: Health Benefits and Risks
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2013) 97:477–501 DOI 10.1007/s00253-012-4552-8 MINI-REVIEW Macro and trace mineral constituents and radionuclides in mushrooms: health benefits and risks Jerzy Falandysz & Jan Borovička Received: 30 August 2012 /Revised: 23 October 2012 /Accepted: 24 October 2012 /Published online: 25 November 2012 # The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract This article reviews and updates data on macro and Keywords Environment . Food . Fungi . Organic food . Se trace elements and radionuclides in edible wild-grown and bioenrichment . Wild food cultivated mushrooms. A huge biodiversity of mushrooms and spread of certain species over different continents makes the study on their multi-element constituents highly challeng- Introduction ing. A few edible mushrooms are widely cultivated and efforts areontoemploythem(largelyAgaricus spp., Pleurotus spp., Mushrooms are heterotrophic eukaryotic organisms classi- and Lentinula edodes) in the production of selenium-enriched fied in the kingdom of Fungi. Recent estimates based on food (mushrooms) or nutraceuticals (by using mycelia) and high-throughput sequencing methods suggest that there are less on species used by traditional medicine, e.g., Ganoderma as many as 5.1 million fungal species worldwide (Blackwell lucidum. There are also attempts to enrich mushrooms with 2011). The European continent has witnessed the highest other elements than Se and a good example is enrichment with number of studies in this area, and in this continent, at least lithium. Since minerals of nutritional value are common con- 75,000 species exist, and of these, more than 15,000 species stituents of mushrooms collected from natural habitats, the are macrofungi, i.e., fungi forming fruit bodies (sporocarps) problem is however their co-occurrence with some hazardous that are visible to the naked eye (Senn-Irlet et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook on Mushroom Cultivation and Processing (With Dehydration, Preservation and Canning)
    Handbook on Mushroom Cultivation and Processing (with Dehydration, Preservation and Canning) Author: NIIR Board of Consultants and Engineers Format: Paperback ISBN: 9788178330341 Code: NI164 Pages: 544 Price: Rs. 1,275.00 US$ 125.00 Publisher: Asia Pacific Business Press Inc. Usually ships within 5 days Mushrooms are the health food of the world. These are that fast growing basidiomycetous fungi which produce fleshy fruit bodies. They are rich in proteins, vitamins and minerals, so they are consumed as energy rich food. Mushroom has been attracting attention of mankind since ancient times and use of mushroom, as food is as old as human civilization. Mushrooms are superior to many vegetables and beans in their nutritive value. It is very rich in protein, vitamins and minerals. Fresh mushrooms contain about 85% water and 3.2% protein. But dried mushrooms water content is low and protein level is high as 34 to 44% and the fat content is less than 0.3%. There are about 100 species of edible mushrooms all over the world. But only three of them are cultivated in India which are Agaricus bisporus, Volvariella volvacea and pleurotus sajor caju. Unfortunately, it is realized that mushrooms did not receive universal acceptance over the years since a number of naturally growing mushrooms are poisonous. Now the situation has been changed because the cultivated edible mushrooms are totally safe for human consumption. Mushroom cultivation fits in very well with sustainable farming and has several advantages: it uses agricultural waste products, a high production per surface area can be obtained, after picking; the spent substrate is still a good soil conditioner.
    [Show full text]
  • Cantharellus Cibarius. the Chanterelle Is a Member of a Very
    THE MUSHROOMS OF MOUNT HOPE CEMETERY Text and photography by Marie F. Heerkens This ongoing survey of the mushrooms and other fungi in Mount Hope Cemetery was made possible by an inquiry and an invitation from Marilyn Nolte. I enjoyed starting this project and photographing various fungal species over the summer and early fall of 2009. The wonderful variety of terrain and trees of the Mount Hope Cemetery makes it a great place to find a wide variety of mushrooms. To start with, what is a mushroom? All Cantharellus cibarius. The Chanterelle is a member of a very interesting group of mushrooms belong to the kingdom of mushroomsthat have gill ridges that are not true gills. These ridges are often forked and have cross veins between them. The yellow chanterelle is quite vivid and easily seen fungi. The mushroom we see along the forestfloor. Chanterelles also have a delicate scent of apricots. aboveground or emerging from decaying wood is the fruiting body of the fungus. The function of this mushroom is to distribute the spores being produced by specialized cells that usually line the gills or other surfaces of the mushroom. You may see mushrooms growing in association with certain trees. These are known as "mycorrhizal" which have a symbiotic connection with tree roots. Others are "saprophytic" which grow on dead wood and other organic matter. There are also "parasitic" mushrooms that grow on living plants, and even other mushrooms. The mycelium are the hidden structures of the fungi that grow in and around the substrate that are comparable to the roots of a plant.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Missouri's Edible and Poisonous Mushrooms
    A GUIDE TO MISSOURI’S EDIBLE AND POISONOUS MUSHROOMS MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION A Guide to Missouri’s Edible and Poisonous Mushrooms by Malissa Briggler, Missouri Department of Conservation Content review by Patrick R. Leacock, Ph.D. Front cover: Morels are the most widely recognized edible mushroom in Missouri. They can be found throughout the state and are the inspiration of several festivals and mushroom-hunting forays. Photo by Jim Rathert. Caution! If you choose to eat wild mushrooms, safety should be your first concern. Never forget that some mushrooms are deadly, and never eat a mushroom you have not positively identified. If you cannot positively identify a mushroom you want to eat, throw it out. The author, the reviewers, the Missouri Department of Conservation, and its employees disclaim any responsibility for the use or misuse of information in this book. mdc.mo.gov Copyright © 2018 by the Conservation Commission of the State of Missouri Published by the Missouri Department of Conservation PO Box 180, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102–1080 Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Missouri Department of Conservation is available to all individuals without regard to their race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. Questions should be directed to the Department of Conservation, PO Box 180, Jefferson City, MO 65102, 573–751–4115 (voice) or 800–735–2966 (TTY), or to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Federal Assistance, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Mail Stop: MBSP-4020, Arlington, VA 22203. TABLE OF CONTENTS Enjoy Missouri’s Wild Mushrooms Safely ....................
    [Show full text]