DOCSLIB.ORG

The First Annual Louisiana State Arthropod Museum Mad Dog Marathon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The First Annual Louisiana State Arthropod Museum Mad Dog Marathon Education connection “To Finish is to Win:” The First Annual Louisiana State Arthropod Museum Mad Dog Marathon Matthew L. Gimmel and Michael L. Ferro common complaint in insect tax- onomy classes is that the required new species, an ecologist conducting a com- Ainsect collection is “too hard” in one the researcher is a taxonomist describing Additionally, the authors have worked with aspect or another; i.e. too many families are students of successive classes in a formal munity inventory, a specialist on pests of a of(MLG: the TAefforts, spring warnings, 2009, LSU) and and help informal from to a good collecting location, or it requires particular crop, an extension agent, or even capacity. We have found that, despite all toorequired, much it’s time difficult to complete. or impossible Despite to travel the annoyingan exterminator. to catastrophic. Misidentifications All researchers in any of a consistently high percentage of students warnings and help from instructors and these fields can have results that range from- instructors, TAs, and veterans of the class, teaching assistants (TAs), some students the course as a result of a low collection working with insects outside of a labora submitgrade. A terrible poorly collections.made insect Some collection even notfail - tory setting should voucher specimens from - dentsultimately at Louisiana fail the course State Arthropod because of Museum a dismal their work. This is an absolute requirement collection.(LSAM), tested The the authors, merit ofboth these graduate complaints stu for responsible research. Specimens must student,only results a lost in opportunity a low grade, to but learn also proper rep in a fun, interesting, and engaging way. This be properly preserved and labeled before techniques,resents a wasted a poor effort use of resourceson the part such of theas beingLike sent most to specialistsentomology for departments, identification ours or confirmation (see Gotelli 2004). andendeavor properly was curated developed in 24 hours, to assess while how lim- graduate students to take a course in insect norpins placed and label in the paper, permanent and useless collection, specimens. and many families of insects could be collected taxonomy,at Louisiana which State Universityhas an insect (LSU) collection requires The latter can be used neither for teaching campus. A desire to engage the faculty and component. Insect Taxonomy is taught in how not to prepare a specimen. studentsiting our incollecting the Department range to of the Entomology, university their only possible value is as an example of- as well as other departments on campus and insect collection accounts for half of the ries of student error: technical errors and thecourse spring grade. of odd-numberedThe insect collection years gradeand the is We have identified two general catego Dog Marathon competition. the public at large, led us to create the Mad time-budgeting errors. Technical errors- based on points for each correctly identified ment.encompass Specimen problems preparation in specimen mistakes and We sought to discover what quality of (and correctly spelled) family, diversity of label preparation and specimen arrange ininsect a single collection, day at a based single onsite. diversity The data and we species within families, proper preservation gatheredspecimen showpreparation, that the could requirements be assembled of a (pinning, alcohol, etc.), proper labeling, and alcohol),involve preserving improper insectspinning improperly (e.g. pinning (e.g. a traditional insect taxonomy course are not, overall presentation of the collection. The- dry-mounting something that should be in collection must also be turned in on time. pointing (e.g. a specimen pointed on the left families.The minimum taxonomic diversity require side),beetle and through poor arrangement the pronotum), of the improper specimen Background:indeed, unreasonable! “Insect Collection Theory” ment for most “A” collections is about 120 One of the most important and funda- in three taxonomy classes (MLF: fall of 2000 mental skills all entomologists must possess [StephenThe authors W. Wilson, have experienceCentral Missouri as students State mistakes(e.g. not spreadingare perhaps a butterfly,the most frustrating,or a beetle with legs cattywampus). Label preparation - is the ability to identify (to some meaningful University], fall of 2003 [Robert W. Sites, as they tend to be epidemic in a collection.- level; the family rank is convenient) and pre University of Missouri, Columbia]; MLG: These mistakes often include oversized 74serve insect specimens. This is true whether Spring 2007 [Christopher E. Carlton, LSU]). fonts, wideAmerican borders, Entomologist lacking locality• Summer informa 2010 mental manipulations” to illustrate the type oftention, erroneous a result of dates, the student’s false label poor information record- docked 10% for being a day late). The title of limited time and a limited geographic area. keeping),(sometimes and through incorrect willful orientation. deceit, but more our event, described herein, commemorates of collection that could be produced given Throughout the semester, countless Thehis heroic Event! efforts. examples of proper pinning, pointing, speci- The entire competition was organized style competition at LSU as a practical in less than one week by the authors (both- to the students. Each student is put through exampleThe authors of what decided kind of to insect stage acollection BioBlitz- graduate students). Competitors provided practicalmen arrangement, exercises to and communicate labeling are precisely shown pins,their ethylown collectingacetate, and equipment, alcohol were or bor do- resources. This had the dual purpose of rowed equipment from LSAM. Label paper, preparation. At all times, proper collections generatingcan be assembled some empirical with limited data on time the timeand participants were six students (and student what is expected for specimen and label- nated by LSAM (< $100 in supplies). The plus promoting the art of insect collecting to collecting and entomology: the two authors, are available to each student for compari theinvolved department in assembling and others a proper on campus. collection, The equivalents) with a keen interest in insect collectionson. How isso a many deep andare profoundable to make mystery such to a rules were simple: Park, and Erich Schoeller. plethora of technical errors in their final Stephanie Gil, Leigh-Anne Lawton, Jong-Seok mistakes as their own (“Yep, you’re right, I - Points were awarded in the following us. Upon review most students accept these tion, must take place in a 24-hour time way: The second category, and the one we 1) Everything,period. from collection to comple pinnedwish to thatfocus beetle on for the the wrong remainder, way…”). is one of order t • 10 points for each correctly identified of either not understanding or ignoring the 2) Specimenscar required). must (Fig. only 1) be collected on family ime-budgeting errors, which are a result LSU’s main campus in Baton Rouge (no • 25 points forfor eacheach series correctly (5 or identified more in- required in constructing a collection. Time- - proper time investment for each of the tasks 3) Only adult hexapods are eligible for species) - submission. • 1dividuals point for of each the sameadditional species/morpho morphospe- budgeting errors inevitably result in not 4) No specimens will be accepted without- cies within a family (at the discretion of having collected enough families, not hav rectlylabel data. for credit. the judges) ing identified specimens already collected,- 5) All family names must be spelled cor tionnot havingon time. properly Late collections arranged typically specimens, occur proper insect drawers for maximum presentation and/or ultimately not submitting the collec 6) Specimenscredit. must be arranged neatly in • 50 points available for overall quality of The person who earned the most points specimens.because the Interestingly, student is scrambling in our experience, at the - lastthis minuteis an area to inlabel, which identify, students or arrange rarely take the - Rules 3–6 parallel those of ENTM 4005. was to be declared the Grand Prize win Rules 1 and 2 were self-imposed “experi ner, but acknowledgments were given for all the blame. The most popular excuses for poor collections stem from time-budgeting errors: “It’s impossible to get 120 families,” “I todon’t identify have amy car specimens,” so I couldn’t “I drive didn’t to think a good it collecting area,” “I didn’t have enough time collection,” and so on. wouldSerendipitously, take so long towe label were and shown arrange what my a dedicated student can do in a short amount of time. In the spring of 2005, one student of Insect Taxonomy, Dmitry “Mad Dog” Chouljenko, performed an extraordinary feat. The day the collection was due, the collected throughout the semester were still properly field-labeled specimens he had - ning,in the pointing, freezer or and in spreading alcohol. That his specimens. afternoon, Workinghe arrived through at the themuseum night, heand made began proper pin - nomically arranged the specimens in his col- lection.locality Byand the identification next morning, labels he presentedand taxo the instructor with an exemplary A+ collec- tion spanning two drawers (though he was Fig. 1. Map of the boundaries set for the Mad Dog Marathon competition. American Entomologist • 75 Volume 56, Number 2 collecting the most families of Hemiptera, During the wee hours of the morning, Coleoptera,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scanning Electron Morphological Studies of Tribolium Confusum Jacquelin Du Val (Coleopteran: Tenebrionidae) Nasra M
    Zohry The Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology (2017) 78:6 The Journal of Basic DOI 10.1186/s41936-017-0008-0 and Applied Zoology RESEARCH Open Access Scanning electron morphological studies of Tribolium confusum Jacquelin du Val (Coleopteran: Tenebrionidae) Nasra M. H. Zohry Abstract Background: The confused flour beetle Tribolium confusum Jacquelin du Val (Coleopteran: Tenebrionidae) is the most destructive pest of stored products worldwide. It is the most common pest of wheat flour. Results: This study describes and illustrates the larvae, pupae, and adults of T. confusum using scanning electron microscopy. The first larval instars are 5.0–5.1 mm long and 0.5–0.6 mm wide whereas the last larval instars are 5. 75–6.9 mm long and 0.75–0.95 mm wide. Adults of T. confusum are reddish brown elongate beetles (4.0–4.5 mm in body length and 1.0–1.2 mm in width). Electron micrographs revealed the structure of the mouth parts during the larval, pupal, and adult stages as well as the structure of thoracic and abdominal appendages. Results indicated that the setiferous sex patches which were reported in males can often be used for sexing specimens. A specific feature of the first instar larvae of T. confusum is the extreme shortened antenna with a reduced number of antennomeres and the presence of well-developed and moderately long legs. Conclusion: SEM examination may help us not only discover and understand new morphological details as the pits with spine on the elytra and the spikes on the membrane wings which will facilitate the identification of this species but also clarify the functions of various body parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Embryology of a “Living Fossil” Beetle, Tenomerga Mucida (Chevrolat, 1829) (Archostemata, Cupedidae)* Kazuki KOJIMA and Ryuichiro MACHIDA
    Proc. Arthropod. Embryol. Soc. Jpn. 50, 17 (2016) 17 Ⓒ 2016 Arthropodan Embryological Society of Japan ISSN 1341–1527 Embryology of a “Living fossil” Beetle, Tenomerga mucida (Chevrolat, 1829) (Archostemata, Cupedidae)* Kazuki KOJIMA and Ryuichiro MACHIDA Sugadaira Montane Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Sugadaira Kogen, Ueda, Nagano 386–2204, Japan E-mail: [email protected] (KK) The order Coleoptera, the most species-rich lineage of molecular analyses (cf. Misof et al., 2014). We stained with Holometabola, comprises about 40% of the described species DAPI and observed embryos under a fluorescence in Hexapoda. The order is divided into four suborders, i.e., stereomicroscope and grasped the outline of T. mucida Archostemata, Myxophaga, Adephaga and Polyphaga, but embryonic development. It was revealed that T. mucida their phylogenetic relationships have been variously embryo completely sinks deep into the yolk in the middle discussed. Archostemata, which include the oldest fossil stage of embryonic development. The complete immersion of record of Coleoptera, have been often regarded as being the the embryo into the yolk may be the first example in basalmost lineage of the order from morphological and Coleoptera. After the embryonic development of about 10 molecular evidence (Friedrich et al., 2009; Bocak et al., 2014). days (under the room temperature), larvae hatched out from Thus, Archostemata are the most significant coleopteran near the anterior pole of the egg. The first instar larva walked subgroup in understanding Coleoptera, especially in the around in the rearing case to seek for residence, and in several reconstruction of its groundplan and phylogeny. Although days they burrowed among rotten logs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Head Morphology of Ascioplaga Mimeta (Coleoptera: Archostemata) and the Phylogeny of Archostemata
    Eur. J. Entomol. 103: 409–423, 2006 ISSN 1210-5759 The head morphology of Ascioplaga mimeta (Coleoptera: Archostemata) and the phylogeny of Archostemata THOMAS HÖRNSCHEMEYER1, JÜRGEN GOEBBELS2, GERD WEIDEMANN2, CORNELIUS FABER3 and AXEL HAASE3 1Universität Göttingen, Institut für Zoologie & Anthropologie, Abteilung Morphologie & Systematik, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] 2Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung (BAM), Berlin, Germany 3Physikalisches Institut, University of Würzburg, Germany Keywords. Archostemata, Cupedidae, phylogeny, NMR-imaging, skeletomuscular system, micro X-ray computertomography, head morphology Abstract. Internal and external features of the head of Ascioplaga mimeta (Coleoptera: Archostemata) were studied with micro X-ray computertomography (µCT) and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (NMRI). These methods allowed the reconstruction of the entire internal anatomy from the only available fixed specimen. The mouthparts and their associated musculature are highly derived in many aspects. Their general configuration corresponds to that of Priacma serrata (the only other archostematan studied in comparable detail). However, the mandible-maxilla system of A. mimeta is built as a complex sorting apparatus and shows a distinct specialisation for a specific, but still unknown, food source. The phylogenetic analysis resulted in the identification of a new mono- phylum comprising the genera [Distocupes + (Adinolepis +Ascioplaga)]. The members of this taxon are restricted to the Australian zoogeographic region. The most prominent synapomorphies of these three genera are their derived mouthparts. INTRODUCTION 1831) (Snyder, 1913; Barber & Ellis, 1920), Tenomerga Ascioplaga mimeta Neboiss, 1984 occurs in New Cale- mucida (Chevrolat, 1829) (Fukuda, 1938, 1939), Disto- donia (a French island ca. 1400 km ENE of Brisbane, cupes varians (Lea, 1902) (Neboiss, 1968), P.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting References for Nelson & Ellis
    Supplemental Data for Nelson & Ellis (2018) The citations below were used to create Figures 1 & 2 in Nelson, G., & Ellis, S. (2018). The History and Impact of Digitization and Digital Data Mobilization on Biodiversity Research. Publication title by year, author (at least one ADBC funded author or not), and data portal used. This list includes papers that cite the ADBC program, iDigBio, TCNs/PENs, or any of the data portals that received ADBC funds at some point. Publications were coded as "referencing" ADBC if the authors did not use portal data or resources; it includes publications where data was deposited or archived in the portal as well as those that mention ADBC initiatives. Scroll to the bottom of the document for a key regarding authors (e.g., TCNs) and portals. Citation Year Author Portal used Portal or ADBC Program was referenced, but data from the portal not used Acevedo-Charry, O. A., & Coral-Jaramillo, B. (2017). Annotations on the 2017 Other Vertnet; distribution of Doliornis remseni (Cotingidae ) and Buthraupis macaulaylibrary wetmorei (Thraupidae ). Colombian Ornithology, 16, eNB04-1 http://asociacioncolombianadeornitologia.org/wp- content/uploads/2017/11/1412.pdf [Accessed 4 Apr. 2018] Adams, A. J., Pessier, A. P., & Briggs, C. J. (2017). Rapid extirpation of a 2017 Other VertNet North American frog coincides with an increase in fungal pathogen prevalence: Historical analysis and implications for reintroduction. Ecology and Evolution, 7, (23), 10216-10232. Adams, R. P. (2017). Multiple evidences of past evolution are hidden in 2017 Other SEINet nrDNA of Juniperus arizonica and J. coahuilensis populations in the trans-Pecos, Texas region.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy of the Reticulate Beetles of the Subfamily Cupedinae (Coleoptera: Archostemata), with a Review of the Historical Development A.G
    Invertebrate Zoology, 2016, 13(2): 61–190 © INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY, 2016 Taxonomy of the reticulate beetles of the subfamily Cupedinae (Coleoptera: Archostemata), with a review of the historical development A.G. Kirejtshuk1,2, A. Nel2, P.A. Kirejtshuk3 1 Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya emb. 1, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 2 Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB - UMR 7205 – CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 50, Entomologie, F-75005, Paris, France. E-mail: [email protected] 3 6th Linia, 49-34, St. Petersburg, 199004, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT:The paper is mainly devoted to the studies of the fossil Cupedidae from the Paleocene of Menat (Puy-de-Dôme, France) and to a preliminary generic analysis of the subfamily Cupedinae. All modern and fossil taxa of genus rank which could belong to Cupedinae are revised. The previous division of this subfamily into tribes (including Priacmini and Mesocupidini) is regarded as not advisable. An annotated list of the fossil species of the subfamily Cupedinae is compiled and revised. New keys to subfamilies of Cupedidae and to genera and subgenera of Cupedinae, and also keys for species of Cainomerga subgen.n. and Cupes found in deposits from Menat are given. As a result, several new genera and subgenera are proposed, i.e. the fossil Apriacma gen.n., from the early Cretaceous (the type species: Priacma tuberculosa Tan, Ren et Shin, 2006), Cre- tomerga gen.n., from the early Cretaceous (the type species: Priacmopsis subtilis Tan et Ren, 2006), Cupopsis gen.n.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary, Annotated List of Beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) from the UW-Milwaukee Field Station Daniel K
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Field Station Bulletins UWM Field Station 2013 A Preliminary, Annotated List of Beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) from the UW-Milwaukee Field Station Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/fieldstation_bulletins Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Young, D.K. 2013. A preliminary, annotated list of beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) from the UW-Milwaukee Field Station. Field Station Bulletin 33: 1-17 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Field Station Bulletins by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Preliminary, Annotated List of Beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) from the UW-Milwaukee Field Station Daniel K. Young Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison [email protected] Abstract: Coleoptera, the beetles, account for nearly 25% of all known animal species, and nearly 18% of all described species of life on the planet. Their species richness is equal to the number of all plant species in the world and six times the number of all vertebrate species. They are found almost everywhere, yet many minute or cryptic species go virtually un-noticed even by trained naturalists. Little wonder, then, that such a dominant group might pass through time relatively unknown to most naturalists, hobbyists, and even entomologists; even an elementary comprehension of the beetle fauna of our own region has not been attempted. A single, fragmentary and incomplete list of beetle species was published for Wisconsin in the late 1800’s; the last three words of the final entry merely say, “to be continued.” The present, preliminary, survey chronicles nothing more than a benchmark, a definitive starting point from which to build.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Middle Mesozoic of China Illuminating the Phylogeny of Ommatidae Jingjing Tan1,2, Yongjie Wang2, Dong Ren2* and Xingke Yang1*
    Tan et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2012, 12:113 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/12/113 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access New fossil species of ommatids (Coleoptera: Archostemata) from the Middle Mesozoic of China illuminating the phylogeny of Ommatidae Jingjing Tan1,2, Yongjie Wang2, Dong Ren2* and Xingke Yang1* Abstract Background: Ommatidae is arguably the “most ancestral” extant beetle family. Recent species of this group are only found in South America and Australia, but the fossil record reveals a much broader geographical distribution in the Mesozoic. Up to now, thirteen fossil genera with more than 100 species of ommatids have been described. However, the systematic relationships of the extant and extinct Ommatidae have remained obscure. Three constraint topologies were designed based on Kirejtshuk’s hypothesis, enforced the monophyly of Tetraphalerus + Odontomma, Pareuryomma + Notocupes and both respectively. Results: In this study, four new species, Pareuryomma ancistrodonta sp. nov., Pareuryomma cardiobasis sp. nov., Omma delicata sp. nov., and Tetraphalerus decorosus sp. nov., are described. Based on well-preserved fossil specimens and previously published data the phylogenetic relationships of extant and extinct lineages of Ommatidae were analyzed for the first time cladistically. Based on the results we propose a new classification with six tribes of Ommatidae: Pronotocupedini, Notocupedini, Lithocupedini, Brochocoleini, Ommatini and Tetraphalerini. These taxa replace the traditional four subfamilies. Conclusion: There is good support for the monophyly of the ingroup. Notocupedini, as defined by Ponomarenko, are paraphyletic. Notocupoides + Eurydictyon are the sister group of the remaining fossil and extant ommatids. Together they form the clade Pronotocupedini. Notocupedini and Lithocupedini are the next two branches.
    [Show full text]
  • The Species-Level Phylogeny of Archostematan Beetles—Where Do Micromalthus Debilis and Crowsoniella Relicta Belong?
    Systematic Entomology (2009), 34, 533–558 The species-level phylogeny of archostematan beetles—where do Micromalthus debilis and Crowsoniella relicta belong? THOMAS HORNSCHEMEYER¨ Department of Morphology and Systematics, Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach-Institute for Zoology and Anthropology, Georg-August-University Gottingen,¨ Gottingen,¨ Germany Abstract. A species-level phylogenetic analysis comprising 37 of the 45 known extant species of archostematan beetles and a total of 110 morphological characters from adults and larvae is presented. For the first time, characters of the male genitalia are included in a phylogenetic analysis of Archostemata. The dataset is analysed with parsimony as well as with Bayesian algorithms. Analyses with differently arranged datasets, with larval characters included or excluded, and including or excluding Micromalthus debilis and Crowsoniella relicta are conducted. The resulting hypothesis of the species-level phylogeny of Archostemata confirms Cupedidae and Ommatidae as monophyletic taxa. Within Cupedidae, the South American Paracupes and the North American Priacma together are the sister group to all remaining Cupedidae. Among the latter, the identification of a clade comprising Rhipsideigma, Cupes capitatus and Tenomerga leucophaea renders Tenomerga polyphyletic. Ascioplaga scalena comb. nov. is transferred from Adinolepis. Characters of the male genitalia support phylogenetic affinities of Micromalthus debilis with Ommatidae and of Crowsoniella relicta with Cupedidae. Introduction and 36 species; and the monotypic families Crowsoniellidae, Micromalthidae and possibly Jurodidae (Lawrence & Newton, Archostemata is one of four suborders of beetles (Coleoptera) 1995; Kirejtshuk, 1999; Hornschemeyer,¨ 2005). (e.g. Crowson, 1960; Lawrence & Newton, 1995), and consti- Crowsoniella relicta and Micromalthus debilis are remark- tutes the smallest and the least investigated of these suborders.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Archostemata: Cupedidae)
    73 (2): 239 – 258 20.8.2015 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2015. Morphology of the first instar larva of Tenomerga mucida (Chevrolat, 1829) (Coleoptera: Archostemata: Cupedidae) Margarita I. Yavorskaya 1, 2, Kazuki Kojima 3, Ryuichiro Machida 3 & Rolf G. Beutel *, 1 1 Institut für Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, FSU Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany; Rolf G. Beutel * [[email protected]] — 2 Department of Entomology, Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie gory 1 – 12, Moscow, Russia — 3 Sugadaira Montane Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Sugadaira Kogen, Ueda, Nagano 386-2204, Japan — * Corresponding author Accepted 05.vi.2015. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/arthropod-systematics on 07.viii.2015. Abstract External and internal structures of 1st instar larvae of Tenomerga mucida are described and illustrated in detail. The larvae display previous­ ly identified archostematan autapomorphies such as the posterodorsal and posteroventral cephalic emarginations, the median endocarina, a distinctly reduced epicranial suture, the lateral cardinal sclerite, the loss of M. craniocardinalis, a sclerotized prominent ligula, a distinctly reduced tentorium, the transverse muscle of the posterior head capsule, tergal and sternal ampullae, and the strongly muscularized loop of the hind gut. Unusual plesiomorphies are the presence of a well-developed M. frontolabralis (M8) and a tentoriomandibular muscle. The presence of two extrinsic premental muscles and a subdivided postlabium are also plesiomorphic features. A derived character state described for the first time in an archostematan larva is the presence of glands in the anterior and posterior abdomen. The postcephalic musculature is similar to the condition found in Micromalthus and Rhipsideigma. The neck musculature is strongly developed, and also the dorsal and ventral longitudinal muscles, probably in correlation with wood-boring habits.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Larval Morphology of Beetles of the Suborder Archostemata (Insecta: Coleoptera), Including First-Instar Chaetotaxy
    Eur. J. Entomol. 101: 273–292, 2004 ISSN 1210-5759 Review of larval morphology of beetles of the suborder Archostemata (Insecta: Coleoptera), including first-instar chaetotaxy VASILY V. GREBENNIKOV Institut für Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionbiologie, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Erbertstraße 1, D-07743 Jena, Germany and Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Distocupes, Tenomerga, Rhipsideigma, Priacma, Omma, Micromalthus, Cupedidae, Micromalthidae, Ommatidae, Archostemata, Coleoptera, larvae, morphology, chaetotaxy, phylogeny Abstract. This paper presents a synthesis of morphological information on larvae of the beetle suborder Archostemata. Larvae of the following families and species were studied: Ommatidae: Omma sp.; Micromalthidae: Micromalthus debilis LeConte, 1878; Cupedi- dae: Priacma serrata LeConte, 1861, Distocupes varians (Lea, 1902), Rhipsideigma raffrayi (Fairmaire, 1884), Tenomerga cinerea (Say, 1831) and Tenomerga mucida (Chevrolat, 1829). Morphological characters of the suborder and three families are described. Monophyly of the suborder is strongly supported by more than 10 larval autapomorphies. A close relationship between Micro- malthidae and Cupedidae is confirmed. New larval characters are introduced, including chaetotaxy of first instar larvae of Micromal- thus LeConte, 1878, Priacma LeConte, 1874 and Distocupes Neboiss, 1984. An identification key to families and subfamilies of Archostematan larvae is provided, along with a checklist of extant Archostemata taxa. The work is illustrated with 120 morpho- logical drawings. INTRODUCTION can be found in several publications (Barber, 1913a, b; Böving, 1929; Böving & Craighead, 1931; Pringle, 1938; This is an overview of the external larval morphology Scott, 1936, 1938, 1941; Peterson, 1960; Costa et al., of members of the coleopteran suborder Archostemata.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology of the First Instar Larva of Tenomerga Mucida(Chevrolat, 1829) (Coleoptera: Archostemata: Cupedidae) 239-258 73 (2): 239 – 258 20.8.2015
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny Jahr/Year: 2015 Band/Volume: 73 Autor(en)/Author(s): Beutel Rolf Georg, Yavorskaya Margarita I., Kojima Kazuki, Machida Ryuichiro Artikel/Article: Morphology of the first instar larva of Tenomerga mucida(Chevrolat, 1829) (Coleoptera: Archostemata: Cupedidae) 239-258 73 (2): 239 – 258 20.8.2015 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2015. Morphology of the first instar larva of Tenomerga mucida (Chevrolat, 1829) (Coleoptera: Archostemata: Cupedidae) Margarita I. Yavorskaya 1, 2, Kazuki Kojima 3, Ryuichiro Machida 3 & Rolf G. Beutel *, 1 1 Institut für Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, FSU Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany; Rolf G. Beutel * [[email protected]] — 2 Department of Entomology, Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie gory 1 – 12, Moscow, Russia — 3 Sugadaira Montane Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Sugadaira Kogen, Ueda, Nagano 386-2204, Japan — * Corresponding author Accepted 05.vi.2015. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/arthropod-systematics on 07.viii.2015. Abstract External and internal structures of 1st instar larvae of Tenomerga mucida are described and illustrated in detail. The larvae display previous­ ly identified archostematan autapomorphies such as the posterodorsal and posteroventral cephalic emarginations, the median endocarina, a distinctly reduced epicranial suture, the lateral cardinal sclerite, the loss of M. craniocardinalis, a sclerotized prominent ligula, a distinctly reduced tentorium, the transverse muscle of the posterior head capsule, tergal and sternal ampullae, and the strongly muscularized loop of the hind gut. Unusual plesiomorphies are the presence of a well-developed M. frontolabralis (M8) and a tentoriomandibular muscle.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Annual Summit
    2017 Annual Summit Gainesville, Florida November 2-3, 2017 Welcome Information General Dear colleagues, Welcome to the 7th annual iDigBio-hosted summit for ADBC scientists and students! Again this year, the summit is a large event with an anticipated 130 participants, including those from 20 TCNs, other colleagues working with biodiversity collections data, guests from the NSF, and iDigBio. As in past years, we have a packed agenda of presentations and breakout groups, but we also have plenty of opportunities for networking and discussion. The latter include daily morning and afternoon breaks, lunches, an evening reception at the Florida Museum, and an open meeting space that is available any time of day for small groups to gather and discuss topics of specific interest to them. The national effort to digitize information in biocollections has been successfully catalyzed by funding from NSF and activities of TCNs and iDigBio. As a community, we have defined digitization priorities, integrated best practices into workflows, provided cyberinfrastructure resources including a search portal, addressed major challenges via working groups, and built collaborations with data providers/users. We have improved digitization practices, increased involvement in digitization and training, and adopted informatics tools that improve the efficiency and scalability of digitization in all types of collections. In its 7th year, iDigBio is working with staff in more than 500 collections in 336 institutions. We have communicated with our stakeholders to increase access to collections data through workshops, webinars, the iDigBio Spotlight, and social media. During its first 6 years, iDigBio sponsored attendance of 3,700 participants from 550 institutions to 118 workshops that targeted digitization-related topics.
    [Show full text]