Guanethidine and Related Agents: III. Antagonism by Drugs Which Inhibit the Norepinephrine Pump in Man

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Guanethidine and Related Agents: III. Antagonism by Drugs Which Inhibit the Norepinephrine Pump in Man Guanethidine and related agents: III. Antagonism by drugs which inhibit the norepinephrine pump in man Jerry R. Mitchell, … , Luis Arias, John A. Oates J Clin Invest. 1970;49(8):1596-1604. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI106377. Antagonism of the antihypertensive action of guanethidine by the tricyclic antidepressants, desipramine and protriptyline, has been demonstrated in controlled studies. These antidepressants also prevent the effect of the related ring-substituted guanidinium adrenergic neuron blockers, bethanidine and debrisoquin. That the rise in blood pressure when desipramine is added to guanethidine therapy is not due simply to a pressor action of the two drugs in combination was demonstrated by the lack of an increase in blood pressure when guanethidine was added to desipramine therapy. Investigations were conducted to determine whether antagonism of guanethidine's clinical effect could result from blockade by the tricyclic antidepressants of the norepinephrine pump in the adrenergic neuron membrane, thereby preventing the uptake of guanethidine into the neuron by this pump. Like guanethidine, the indirectly acting pressor amine, tyramine, enters the neuron via the norepinephrine pump. Desipramine, protriptyline, and amitriptyline in clinical doses all were found to block the pressor action of tyramine while potentiating the pressor effect of norepinephrine. The amino acid, methyldopa, does not enter the neuron via the norepinephrine pump, and its antihypertensive action is not altered by concomitant administration of tricyclic antidepressants. It is concluded from the evidence in this investigation together with the results of previous studies in experimental animals that clinical doses of desipramine-like drugs inhibit the norepinephrine pump in the peripheral adrenergic […] Find the latest version: https://jci.me/106377/pdf Guanethidine and Related Agents III. ANTAGONISM BY DRUGS WHICH INHIBIT THE NOREPINEPHRINE PUMP IN MAN JERRY R. MrrCHELL, JOHN H. CAVANAUGH, Luis AIuAs, and JOHN A. OATES From the Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37203 A B S TR A C T Antagonism of the antihypertensive ac- pump in the peripheral adrenergic neuron in man and tion of guanethidine by the tricyclic antidepressants, thereby prevent uptake of guanethidine to its site of desipramine and protriptyline, has been demonstrated action. in controlled studies. These antidepressants also pre- vent the effect of the related ring-substituted guani- dinium adrenergic neuron blockers, bethanidine and INTRODUCTION debrisoquin. That the rise in blood pressure when Observations by Leishman, Mathews, and Smith (2) desipramine is added to guanethidine therapy is not due suggested that imipramine may block the effect of simply to a pressor action of the two drugs in combi- guanethidine in hypertensive patients. Studies in ex- nation was demonstrated by the lack of an increase in perimental animals also have shown that imipramine- blood pressure when guanethidine was added to desipra- like antidepressants will prevent some of the actions of mine therapy. guanethidine (3, 4). Because of the notion that there Investigations were conducted to determine whether is a relation between the psyche and hypertension, the antagonism of guanethidine's clinical effect could result use of such psychotherapeutic agents in the hyper- from blockade by the tricyclic antidepressants of the tensive population is widespread. Accordingly, studies norepinephrine pump in the adrenergic neuron mem- were undertaken to obtain data on the clinical signifi- brane, thereby preventing the uptake of guanethidine cance of interactions between these drugs and guanethi- into the neuron by this pump. Like guanethidine, the dine, and to determine whether similar interactions indirectly acting pressor amine, tyramine, enters the occurred with the related guanidinium antihypertensives, neuron via the norepinephrine pump. Desipramine, pro- bethanidine and debrisoquin. The possibility that the triptyline, and amitriptyline in clinical doses all were antagonism resulted from an inhibition of transport of found to block the pressor action of tyramine while these antihypertensives to their site of action was potentiating the pressor effect of norepinephrine. The investigated. amino acid, methyldopa, does not enter the neuron via the norepinephrine pump, and its antihypertensive ac- METHODS tion is not altered by concomitant administration of tri- The studies were conducted in the Clinical Research Center cyclic antidepressants. It is concluded from the evidence of Vanderbilt University Hospital and in the Nashville in this investigation together with the results of pre- Veterans Administration Hospital. vious studies in experimental animals that clinical doses Demonstration of drug antagonism. 13 hypertensive adults (10 men and 3 women) were placed on a regular of desipramine-like drugs inhibit the norepinephrine hospital diet containing 100 mEq of sodium per day. These patients when hospitalized had persistent hypertension of This work was presented in part to the Southern Society moderate to severe degree; on admission their blood pres- for Clinical Investigation, 1 February 1969, and in a pre- sures while standing ranged from 190 to 250 mm Hg in liminary communication (1). systole and 115 to 160 mm Hg in diastole. Four patients Received for publication 22 July 1969 and in revised form intermittently had mild azotemia (blood urea nitrogen, 22 February 1970. 30-50 mg/100 ml) but none had liver disease. All medica- 1596 The Journal of Clinical Investigation Volume 49 1970 TABLE I Interactions between Antihypertensive and Antidepressant Drugs in Patients Average of mean blood pressures in the standing position 4SE Pre- Post- antagonist Antagonist antagonist Patient Antihypertensive drug and dosage Antagonist drug and dosage period period period L. L. C. Guan, 150 mg daily, 31 days DMI, 75 mg daily, 3 days 93 ±3* 116 43 94 ±5* then 125 mg daily, 6 days D. C. W. Guan, 100 mg daily, 19 days DMI, 50 mg daily, 2 days 112 ±-5t 138 ±2 114 ±1t T. D. P. Guan, 150 mg daily, 18 days DMI, 75 mg daily, 1.3 days 108 ±3* 130 +5 98 ±44t L. J. Guan, 60 mg daily, 20 days DMI, 75 mg daily, 5 days 103 ±4* 128 ±3 108 ±5§ J. H. D. Guan, 70 mg daily, 18 days DMI, 75 mg daily, 3.3 days 103 ±4§ 119 ±3 107 +1§ G. T. E. Guan, 220 mg daily, 30 days DMI, 150 mg daily, 9 days 101 ±41t 116 ±1 111 ±5 E. L. Guan, 50 mg daily, 9 days Pro, 20 mg daily, 3.5 days 115 45* 155 ±66 D. C. W. Beth, 80 mg daily, 16 days DMI, 50 mg daily, 1 day 105 ±2* 142 ±4 106 i2* W. R. D. Beth, 20 mg daily, 30 days DMI, 50 mg daily, 1 day 102 43* 146 ±33 R. H. C. Beth, 15 mg daily, 16 days DMI, 75 mg daily, 2 days 94 ±4* 142 ±:1 126 ±3* W. S. Debr, 60 mg daily, 30 days DMI, 75 mg daily, 1.3 days 88 ±5* 127 ±3 116 43§ H. E. A. Debr, 240 mg daily, 29 days DMI, 75 mg daily, 6 days 80 ±5* 107 ±-1 94 ±1* L. L. B. Meth, 3.0 g daily, 24 days DMI, 75 mg daily, 5 days 99 +4 96 ±5 100 ±4 W. R. D. Meth, 2.5 g daily, 28 days DMI, 75 mg daily, 4.7 days 90 ±4 87 43 E. N. Meth, 3.0 g daily, 15 days DMI, 75 mg daily, 6 days 104 ±-5 96 ±5 Patients receiving a clinically effective dose of guanethidine (Guan), bethanidine (Beth), debrisoquin (Debr), or methyl- dopa (Meth) were given desipramine (DMI) or protriptyline (Pro) as described in Methods. * Differs from antagonist period, P < 0.005. 1 Differs from antagonist period, P < 0.01. § Differs from antagonist period, P < 0.05. tions, with the exception of digitoxin in one patient, were was the proposed antagonist in 14 of the studies, while discontinued for at least 1 wk before the experimental protriptyline was given in the 15th. period. Except for the initial study (patient L. L.) placebo cap- Observations on blood pressure and apical pulse rate were sules identical in appearance and mode of administration to made at the same hour four times daily with the patient desipramine and protriptyline were used during pre and both in the supine and standing (at least 2 min) positions. postexperimental control periods of the studies with guan- The effects of the drug on computed mean blood pressure ethidine, debrisoquin, and methyldopa, in order that patients (diastolic blood pressure plus one-third pulse pressure) would not know when administration of the antidepressant were evaluated. The average mean blood pressure in the drugs was initiated. The placebo did not raise the blood standing position was calculated for each day from the four pressure. daily blood pressure determinations. For statistical analy- After the clinically effective dose of one of the antihyper- sis, the average of each patient's daily mean blood pressures tensive drugs (guanethidine sulfate, bethanidine sulfate, in the standing position for days 1 through 5 (bethanidine, debrisoquin sulfate, or methyldopa) was determined for a debrisoquin, methyldopa patients) or days 2 through 5 patient, that dose was continued throughout the study. The (guanethidine patients) of the antagonist period was com- total daily dose was divided into two or three doses given pared by the two-tailed Student's unpaired t test with the between 9 a.m. and 9 p.m. each day. The antihypertensive corresponding data for both the preantagonist period (the drug was administered alone in that fashion for a control 5 days preceding administration of antagonist) and days period of at least 5 days before adding the proposed 8 through 10 of the postantagonist period (days 11 through antagonist, desipramine hydrochloride or protriptyline hydro- 13 for patients G. T. E. and L.L. C. who received increased chloride. The antagonist was given in divided doses 30 min doses of antagonist).
Recommended publications
  • The In¯Uence of Medication on Erectile Function
    International Journal of Impotence Research (1997) 9, 17±26 ß 1997 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0955-9930/97 $12.00 The in¯uence of medication on erectile function W Meinhardt1, RF Kropman2, P Vermeij3, AAB Lycklama aÁ Nijeholt4 and J Zwartendijk4 1Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2Department of Urology, Leyenburg Hospital, Leyweg 275, 2545 CH The Hague, The Netherlands; 3Pharmacy; and 4Department of Urology, Leiden University Hospital, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands Keywords: impotence; side-effect; antipsychotic; antihypertensive; physiology; erectile function Introduction stopped their antihypertensive treatment over a ®ve year period, because of side-effects on sexual function.5 In the drug registration procedures sexual Several physiological mechanisms are involved in function is not a major issue. This means that erectile function. A negative in¯uence of prescrip- knowledge of the problem is mainly dependent on tion-drugs on these mechanisms will not always case reports and the lists from side effect registries.6±8 come to the attention of the clinician, whereas a Another way of looking at the problem is drug causing priapism will rarely escape the atten- combining available data on mechanisms of action tion. of drugs with the knowledge of the physiological When erectile function is in¯uenced in a negative mechanisms involved in erectile function. The way compensation may occur. For example, age- advantage of this approach is that remedies may related penile sensory disorders may be compen- evolve from it. sated for by extra stimulation.1 Diminished in¯ux of In this paper we will discuss the subject in the blood will lead to a slower onset of the erection, but following order: may be accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Raw Numbers of Prescribed Antidepressant Items by Class, from 1998 to 2018
    Figure S1 - The raw numbers of prescribed antidepressant items by class, from 1998 to 2018. MAOI = monoamine oxidase inhibitor, SNRI = selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, SSRI = selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Figure S2 - The raw numbers of prescribed antidepressant items for the ten most commonly prescribed antidepressants (in 2018), from 1998 to 2018. Figure S3 - Practice level percentile charts for the proportions of the ten most commonly prescribed antidepressants (in 2018), prescribed between August 2010 and November 2019. Deciles are in blue, with median shown as a heavy blue line, and extreme percentiles are in red. Figure S4 - Practice level percentile charts for the proportions of specific MAOIs prescribed between August 2010 and November 2019. Deciles are in blue, with median shown as a heavy blue line, and extreme percentiles are in red. Figure S5 - CCG level heat map for the percentage proportions of MAOIs prescribed between December 2018 and November 2019. MAOI = monoamine oxidase inhibitor. Figure S6 - CCG level heat maps for the percentage proportions of paroxetine, dosulepin, and trimipramine prescribed between December 2018 and November 2019. Table S1 - Antidepressant drugs, by category. MAOI = monoamine oxidase inhibitor, SNRI = selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, SSRI = selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Class Drug MAOI Isocarboxazid, moclobemide, phenelzine, tranylcypromine SNRI Duloxetine, venlafaxine SSRI Citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine,
    [Show full text]
  • PRODUCT MONOGRAPH ELAVIL® Amitriptyline Hydrochloride Tablets
    PRODUCT MONOGRAPH ELAVIL® amitriptyline hydrochloride tablets USP 10, 25, 50 and 75 mg Antidepressant AA PHARMA INC. DATE OF PREPARATION: 1165 Creditstone Road Unit #1 August 29, 2018 Vaughan, ON L4K 4N7 Control No.: 217626 1 PRODUCT MONOGRAPH ELAVIL® amitriptyline hydrochloride tablets USP 10, 25, 50, 75 mg THERAPEUTIC CLASSIFICATION Antidepressant ACTIONS AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Amitriptyline hydrochloride is a tricyclic antidepressant with sedative properties. Its mechanism of action in man is not known. Amitriptyline inhibits the membrane pump mechanism responsible for the re-uptake of transmitter amines, such as norepinephrine and serotonin, thereby increasing their concentration at the synaptic clefts of the brain. Amitriptyline has pronounced anticholinergic properties and produces EKG changes and quinidine-like effects on the heart (See ADVERSE REACTIONS). It also lowers the convulsive threshold and causes alterations in EEG and sleep patterns. Orally administered amitriptyline is readily absorbed and rapidly metabolized. Steady-state plasma concentrations vary widely and this variation may be genetically determined. Amitriptyline is primarily excreted in the urine, mostly in the form of metabolites, with some excretion also occurring in the feces. INDICATIONS AND CLINICAL USE ELAVIL® (amitriptyline hydrochloride) is indicated in the drug management of depressive illness. ELAVIL® may be used in depressive illness of psychotic or endogenous nature and in selected patients with neurotic depression. Endogenous depression is more likely to be alleviated than are other depressive states. ELAVIL® ®, because of its sedative action, is also of value in alleviating the anxiety component of depression. As with other tricyclic antidepressants, ELAVIL® may precipitate hypomanic episodes in patients with bipolar depression. These drugs are not indicated in mild depressive states and depressive reactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Major Depressive Disorder Clinical Practice Guidelines May 2014
    Federal Bureau of Prisons Management of Major Depressive Disorder Clinical Practice Guidelines May 2014 Table of Contents 1. Purpose ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Natural History ................................................................................................................................. 2 Special Considerations ...................................................................................................................... 2 3. Screening ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Screening Questions .......................................................................................................................... 3 Further Screening Methods................................................................................................................ 4 4. Diagnosis ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Depression: Three Levels of Severity ............................................................................................... 4 Clinical Interview and Documentation of Risk Assessment...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/0115729 A1 Qin Et Al
    US 201201.15729A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/0115729 A1 Qin et al. (43) Pub. Date: May 10, 2012 (54) PROCESS FOR FORMING FILMS, FIBERS, Publication Classification AND BEADS FROM CHITNOUS BOMASS (51) Int. Cl (75) Inventors: Ying Qin, Tuscaloosa, AL (US); AOIN 25/00 (2006.01) Robin D. Rogers, Tuscaloosa, AL A6II 47/36 (2006.01) AL(US); (US) Daniel T. Daly, Tuscaloosa, tish 9.8 (2006.01)C (52) U.S. Cl. ............ 504/358:536/20: 514/777; 426/658 (73) Assignee: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF 57 ABSTRACT ALABAMA, Tuscaloosa, AL (US) (57) Disclosed is a process for forming films, fibers, and beads (21) Appl. No.: 13/375,245 comprising a chitinous mass, for example, chitin, chitosan obtained from one or more biomasses. The disclosed process (22) PCT Filed: Jun. 1, 2010 can be used to prepare films, fibers, and beads comprising only polymers, i.e., chitin, obtained from a suitable biomass, (86). PCT No.: PCT/US 10/36904 or the films, fibers, and beads can comprise a mixture of polymers obtained from a suitable biomass and a naturally S3712). (4) (c)(1), Date: Jan. 26, 2012 occurring and/or synthetic polymer. Disclosed herein are the (2), (4) Date: an. AO. films, fibers, and beads obtained from the disclosed process. O O This Abstract is presented solely to aid in searching the sub Related U.S. Application Data ject matter disclosed herein and is not intended to define, (60)60) Provisional applicationpp No. 61/182,833,sy- - - s filed on Jun.
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Oral Anticoagulants and Proton Pump Inhibitor Cotherapy with Hospitalization for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding
    Supplementary Online Content Ray WA, Chung CP, Murray KT, et al. Association of oral anticoagulants and proton pump inhibitor cotherapy with hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.17242 eAppendix. PPI Co-therapy and Anticoagulant-Related UGI Bleeds This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 10/02/2021 Appendix: PPI Co-therapy and Anticoagulant-Related UGI Bleeds Table 1A Exclusions: end-stage renal disease Diagnosis or procedure code for dialysis or end-stage renal disease outside of the hospital 28521 – anemia in ckd 5855 – Stage V , ckd 5856 – end stage renal disease V451 – Renal dialysis status V560 – Extracorporeal dialysis V561 – fitting & adjustment of extracorporeal dialysis catheter 99673 – complications due to renal dialysis CPT-4 Procedure Codes 36825 arteriovenous fistula autogenous gr 36830 creation of arteriovenous fistula; 36831 thrombectomy, arteriovenous fistula without revision, autogenous or 36832 revision of an arteriovenous fistula, with or without thrombectomy, 36833 revision, arteriovenous fistula; with thrombectomy, autogenous or nonaut 36834 plastic repair of arteriovenous aneurysm (separate procedure) 36835 insertion of thomas shunt 36838 distal revascularization & interval ligation, upper extremity 36840 insertion mandril 36845 anastomosis mandril 36860 cannula declotting; 36861 cannula declotting; 36870 thrombectomy, percutaneous, arteriovenous
    [Show full text]
  • Fatal Toxicity of Antidepressant Drugs in Overdose
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL VOLUME 295 24 OCTOBER 1987 1021 Br Med J (Clin Res Ed): first published as 10.1136/bmj.295.6605.1021 on 24 October 1987. Downloaded from PAPERS AND SHORT REPORTS Fatal toxicity of antidepressant drugs in overdose SIMON CASSIDY, JOHN HENRY Abstract dangerous in overdose, thus meriting investigation of their toxic properties and closer consideration of the circumstances in which A fatal toxicity index (deaths per million National Health Service they are prescribed. Recommendations may thus be made that prescriptions) was calculated for antidepressant drugs on sale might reduce the number offatalities. during the years 1975-84 in England, Wales, and Scotland. The We used national mortality statistics and prescription data tricyclic drugs introduced before 1970 had a higher index than the to compile fatal toxicity indices for the currently available anti- mean for all the drugs studied (p<0-001). In this group the depressant drugs to assess the comparative safety of the different toxicity ofamitriptyline, dibenzepin, desipramine, and dothiepin antidepressant drugs from an epidemiological standpoint. Owing to was significantly higher, while that ofclomipramine, imipramine, the nature of the disease these drugs are particularly likely to be iprindole, protriptyline, and trimipramine was lower. The mono- taken in overdose and often cause death. amine oxidase inhibitors had intermediate toxicity, and the antidepressants introduced since 1973, considered as a group, had significantly lower toxicity than the mean (p<0-001). Ofthese newer drugs, maprotiline had a fatal toxicity index similar to that Sources ofinformation and methods of the older tricyclic antidepressants, while the other newly The statistical sources used list drugs under their generic and proprietary http://www.bmj.com/ introduced drugs had lower toxicity indices, with those for names.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Sheet SURMONTIL Trimipramine (As Maleate) 25 Mg Tablets and 50 Mg Capsules
    Data Sheet SURMONTIL trimipramine (as maleate) 25 mg tablets and 50 mg capsules Presentation SURMONTIL tablets are compression coated, white or cream, circular, biconvex, containing the equivalent of 25mg trimipramine (as maleate) with a diameter of about 8.0mm. The face is indented with the name and strength, reverse plain. SURMONTIL capsules are opaque white with opaque green cap, printed SU50, each containing the equivalent of 50mg trimipramine (as maleate). Uses Actions SURMONTIL has a potent anti-depressant action similar to that of other tricyclic anti-depressants. The mechanism of action is not fully understood but it is thought to be via inhibition of neuronal re- uptake of noradrenalin, thereby increasing availability. SURMONTIL also possesses a pronounced sedative action. Pharmacokinetics SURMONTIL is readily absorbed after oral administration, reaching a mean peak plasma level after 3 hours. High first pass hepatic clearance results in a mean bioavailability of about 41% of the oral dose, and trimipramine is extensively protein bound in plasma. Elimination half-life is 24 hours. Metabolism is in the liver to its major metabolite, desmethyltrimipramine, which is excreted mainly in the urine. Indications SURMONTIL is indicated in the treatment of depressive illness, especially where sleep disturbance, anxiety or agitation is a presenting symptom. Sleep disturbance is controlled within 24 hours and true anti-depressant action follows within 7-10 days. Dosage and Administration Adults Mild/Moderate Depression in General Practice: The recommended dosage is 50-75 mg orally given two hours before bedtime, the larger dose (75 mg) being preferable for those patients with more marked sleep disturbance.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Sympathetic Inhibition on Receptive, Proceptive, and Rejection Behaviors in the Female Rat
    Physiology & Behavior, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 537-542, 1996 Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Science Inc. Printed in the USA. All rights reserved 0031-9384/96 $15.00 + .00 ELSEVIER 0031-9384(95)02102-2 Effects of Sympathetic Inhibition on Receptive, Proceptive, and Rejection Behaviors in the Female Rat CINDY M. MESTON, 1 INGRID V. MOE AND BORIS B. GORZALKA Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4 Received 27 September 1994 MESTON, C. M., I. V. MOE AND B. B. GORZALKA. Effects of sympathetic inhibition on receptive, proceptive, and rejection behaviors in the female rat. PHYSIOL BEHAV 59(3) 537-542, 1996.--The present investigation was designed to examine the effects of sympathetic nervous system (SNS) inhibition on sexual behavior in ovariec- tomized, steroid-treated female rats. Clonidine, an alpha2-adrenergic agonist, guanethidine, a postganglionic noradren- ergic blocker, and naphazoline, an alpha2-adrenoreceptor agonist were used to inhibit SNS activity. Intraperitoneal injections of eit:aer 33/zg/ml or 66/xg/ml clonidine significantly decreased receptive (lordosis) and proceptive (ear wiggles) behaviors and significantly increased rejection behaviors (vocalization, kicking, boxing). Either 25 mg/ml or 50 mg/ml guanethidine significantly decreased receptive and proceptive behavior and had no significant effect on rejection behav!iors. Naphazoline significantly inhibited lordosis behavior at either 5 mg/ml or 10 mg/ml doses, significantly inhibited proceptive behavior at 5 mg/ml, and had no significant effect on rejection behaviors. These findings supporc the hypothesis that SNS inhibition decreases sexual activity in the female rat. Lordosis Proceptive behavior Rejection behavior Clonidine Guanethidine Naphazoline Alpha-adrenergic INTRODUCTION as 2 /xg/animal also inhibits lordosis behavior (1).
    [Show full text]
  • (Mibg) Scintigraphy: Procedure Guidelines for Tumour Imaging
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2010) 37:2436–2446 DOI 10.1007/s00259-010-1545-7 GUIDELINES 131I/123I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) scintigraphy: procedure guidelines for tumour imaging Emilio Bombardieri & Francesco Giammarile & Cumali Aktolun & Richard P. Baum & Angelika Bischof Delaloye & Lorenzo Maffioli & Roy Moncayo & Luc Mortelmans & Giovanna Pepe & Sven N. Reske & Maria R. Castellani & Arturo Chiti Published online: 20 July 2010 # EANM 2010 Abstract The aim of this document is to provide general existing procedures for neuroendocrine tumours. The information about mIBG scintigraphy in cancer patients. guidelines should therefore not be taken as exclusive of The guidelines describe the mIBG scintigraphy protocol other nuclear medicine modalities that can be used to obtain currently used in clinical routine, but do not include all comparable results. It is important to remember that the The European Association has written and approved guidelines to promote the use of nuclear medicine procedures with high quality. These general recommendations cannot be applied to all patients in all practice settings. The guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper procedures and exclusive of other procedures reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. The spectrum of patients seen in a specialized practice setting may be different than the spectrum usually seen in a more general setting. The appropriateness of a procedure will depend in part on the prevalence of disease in the patient population. In addition, resources available for patient care may vary greatly from one European country or one medical facility to another. For these reasons, guidelines cannot be rigidly applied. These guidelines summarize the views of the Oncology Committee of the EANM and reflect recommendations for which the EANM cannot be held responsible.
    [Show full text]
  • Quinidine, Beta-Blockers, Diphenylhydantoin, Bretylium *
    Pharmacology of Antiarrhythmics: Quinidine, Beta-Blockers, Diphenylhydantoin, Bretylium * ALBERT J. WASSERMAN, M.D. Professor of Medicine, Chairman, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical College of Virginia, Health Sciences Division of Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia JACK D. PROCTOR, M.D. Assistant Professor of Medicine, Medical College of Virginia, Health Sciences Division of Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia The electrophysiologic effects of the antiar­ adequate, controlled clinical comparisons are virtu­ rhythmic drugs, presented elsewhere in this sym­ ally nonexistent. posium, form only one of the bases for the selec­ A complete presentation of the non-electro­ tion of a therapeutic agent in any given clinical physiologic pharmacology would include the follow­ situation. The final choice depends at least on the ing considerations: following factors: 1. Absorption and peak effect times 1. The specific arrhythmia 2. Biotransformation 2. Underlying heart disease, if any 3. Rate of elimination or half-life (t1d 3. The degree of compromise of the circula­ 4. Drug interactions tion, if any 5. Toxicity 4. The etiology of the arrhythmia 6. Clinical usefulness 5. The efficacy of the drug for that arrhythmia 7. Therapeutic drug levels due to that etiology 8. Dosage schedules 6. The toxicity of the drug, especially in the As all of the above data cannot be presented in given patient with possible alterations in the limited space available, only selected items will volume of distribution, biotransformation, be discussed. Much of the preceding information and excretion is available, however, in standard texts ( 1 7, 10). 7. The electrophysiologic effects of the drug (See Addendum 1) 8. The routes and frequency of administration Quinidine.
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors with the Risk for Spontaneous Intracranial Hemorrhage
    Supplementary Online Content Renoux C, Vahey S, Dell’Aniello S, Boivin J-F. Association of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with the risk for spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage. JAMA Neurol. Published online December 5, 2016. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.4529 eMethods 1. List of Antidepressants for Cohort Entry eMethods 2. List of Antidepressants According to the Degree of Serotonin Reuptake Inhibition eMethods 3. Potential Confounding Variables Included in Multivariate Models eMethods 4. Sensitivity Analyses eFigure. Flowchart of Incident Antidepressant (AD) Cohort Definition and Case- Control Selection eTable 1. Crude and Adjusted Rate Ratios of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Associated With Current Use of SSRIs Relative to TCAs eTable 2. Crude and Adjusted Rate Ratios of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Associated With Current Use of SSRIs Relative to TCAs eTable 3. Crude and Adjusted Rate Ratios of Intracranial Extracerebral Hemorrhage Associated With Current Use of SSRIs Relative to TCAs. eTable 4. Crude and Adjusted Rate Ratios of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Associated With Current Use of Antidepressants With Strong Degree of Inhibition of Serotonin Reuptake Relative to Weak eTable 5. Crude and Adjusted Rate Ratios of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Associated With Current Use of Antidepressants With Strong Degree of Inhibition of Serotonin Reuptake Relative to Weak eTable 6. Crude and Adjusted Rate Ratios of Intracranial Extracerebral Hemorrhage Associated With Current Use of Antidepressants With Strong Degree of Inhibition of Serotonin Reuptake Relative to Weak This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 10/02/2021 eMethods 1.
    [Show full text]