Post-Tenure Faculty Review and Renewal: Experienced Voices
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 469 977 HE 035 409 AUTHOR Licata, Christine M., Ed.; Morreale, Joseph C., Ed. TITLE Post-Tenure Faculty Review and Renewal: Experienced Voices. INSTITUTION American Association for Higher Education, Washington, DC. ISBN ISBN-1-56377-053-9 PUB DATE 2002-00-00 NOTE 306p.; A publication of the "New Pathways Project," the AAHE Forum on Faculty Roles & Rewards. AVAILABLE FROM Ameiican Association for Higher Education, AAHE Publications Orders, P.O. Box 1932, Merrifield, VA 22116-1932 (members, $19; nonmembers, $24). Tel: 301-645-6051; Fax: 301-843-9692; Web site: http://www.aahe.org/catalog/order_info.cfm. PUB TYPE Books (010) Collected Works General (020) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MFO1 /PC13 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Colleges; Higher Education; *Teacher Evaluation; Tenure; *Tenured Faculty IDENTIFIERS *Post Tenure Review; Promotion and Tenure Committees ABSTRACT This collection provides insights into the development, adoption, and implementation of post-tenure review programs at both individual universities and state university systems. In section 1,"System- Level Issues and Lessons," the essays are: (1) "Ahead of Our Time at the End of the Trail? Post-Tenure Review in the Oregon University System" (Shirley M. Clark);(2) "Post-Tenure Review in Kentucky: A Clash of Cultures" (James L. Applegate and Lois M. Nora); (3) "Tracking Evolving Meanings: Five years of Post-Tenure Review in Arizona" (S. Vianne McLean and Thomas Callarman); (4) "The View from the Elephant's Tail: Creation and Implementation of Post- Tenure Review at the University of Massachusetts" (Kate Harrington); and (5) "The Benefits of Pilot Testing: Post-Tenure Review at California State University, Long Beach" (Kelly S. Janousek and Wayne Dick). Section 2, "Lessons Learned for DepartMents, Chairs, and Faculty," contains:(6) "The Evolution of Post-Tenure Review at Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis" (N. Douglas Lees); (7) "The Context as Key to Developing and Implementing Post-Tenure Review: The University of Nebraska-Lincoln Experience" (Gail F. Latta and Daniel W. Wheeler);(8) "Balancing Institutional Processes and State-Mandated Post-Tenure Review" (Betsy E. Brown); and (9) "Transforming Post-Tenure Review into Faculty, Department Head, and Departmental Renewal" (Barbara Hornum). Section 3,"Lessons Learned from Data Analysis," contains:(10) "Getting Out in Front: Cumulative Review and Development for Tenured Faculty" (Ronald J. Henry);(11) "Redesigning Post-Tenure Review To Satisfy Accreditation Requirements" (Ann S. Huneter and Jonathan Lawson);(12) "Post-Tenure Review in Texas: An Evolving Response to the Legislature's Challenge" (Debra P. Price, Dennis Longmire, Frank Fair, Laverne Warner, Paul R. Reed, William Fleming, and JoAnn M. Duffy); and (13) "Learning about Post-Tenure Review from Peer Institutions" (Susan H. Barr). In section 4,"Reflections on the Future," the essays are:(14) "Faculty Well-Being Review: An Alternative to Post-Tenure Review?" (Charles J. Walker); and (15)"A Profession at Risk: Using Post-Tenure Review To Create an Intentional Future" (William M. Plater). A conclusion, "Moving the Conversation Forward," by Christine M. Licata and Joseph C. Morreale, highlights major points from the essays. An appendix lists mini-grant Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. projects funded by the American Association for Higher Education. Each chapter contains references. (SLD) POOR PRINT QUALITY Pgs 3 a2a=saatei=z==szoo Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. A publication of AAHE's New Pathways Project AAHE Forum on Faculty Roles & Rewards s: A B A w/II II I U S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION L Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND This document has been reproduced as DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS received from the person or organization BEEN GRANTED BY originating it 0 Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality 4 3\ \ CIO Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES official OERI position or policy. INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) I Post-Tenure Faculty Review and Renewal Experienced Voices Christine M. Licata and Joseph C. Morreale, editors A Publication of AAHE's New Pathways Project AAHE Forum on Faculty Roles & Rewards FORUM ON c.a.culty Roles & Rewards AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 3 About the Editors Christine M. Licata, associate dean for academic affairs at Rochester Institute of Technology/National Technical Institute for the Deaf, is an AAHE senior asso- ciate with its New Pathways project "Academic Careers for the Next Century: From Inquiry to Practice." In that role, she provides leadership and direction for all activities related to post-tenure review in particular, coordinating the post- tenure review minigrant program "Projects With Promise" and serving as liai- son to the campus/system projects. Licata has investigated post-tenure faculty evaluation practices since 1984, and authored one of the first national reports on the topic: Post-Tenure Faculty Evaluation: Threat or Opportunity? (a 1986 ASHE- ERIC Higher Education Report). During 1998-2001 she worked with the Harvard Project on Faculty Appointments as an adviser and analyst on post- tenure review. Joseph C. Morreale is senior associate provost and vice president for planning, assessment, and research at Pace University and a tenured full professor of pub- lic administration specializing in public finance and higher educational admin- istration. As an AAHE senior scholar with the New Pathways project, he has been actively involved in the study on outcomes and impact of post-tenure review policies at nine major institutions. Morreale is coauthor with Licata of Post-Tenure Review: Policies, Practices, Precautions (AAHE New Pathways Working Paper #12, 1997) and Post-Tenure Review: A Guide Book for Academic Administrators of Colleges and Schools of Business (AACSB, .1997). He has a chap- ter on post-tenure review evaluations in Changing Practices in Evaluating Teaching (Anker, 1999), as well as publications on national health insurance and health care economics and energy and environmental economics. A version of William M. Plater's essay previously appeared in Change magazine, as "A Profession at Risk: Using Post-Tenure Review to Save Tenure and Create an Intentional Future for Academic Community," July/August 2001, pp. 52-57. Sections are reprinted here with permission of the Helen Dwight Reid Educational Foundation. Copyright © 2001 by Heldref Publications, 1319 18th Street NW, Washington, DC 20036-1802. Opinions expressed in this publication are the contributors' and do not necessarily repre- sent the views of the American Association for Higher Education or its members. Copyright © 2002 American Association for Higher Education. Printed in the United States of America. All rights reserved. For information about additional copies of this publication: American Association for Higher Education One Dupont Circle, Suite 360 Washington, DC 20036 www.aahe.org /pubs 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ISBN 1-56377-053-9 Contents Preface R. Eugene Rice Acknowledgments ix Introduction 1 Christine M. Licata and Joseph C. Morreale Section I: System-Level Issues and Lessons Ahead of Our Time at the End of the Trail? Post-Tenure Review in the Oregon University System 19 Shirley M. Clark Post-Tenure Review in Kentucky: A Clash of Cultures 35 James L. Applegate and Lois M. Nora Tracking Evolving Meanings: Five Years of Post-Tenure Review in Arizona 50 S. Vianne McLean and Thomas Callarman The View From the Elephant's Tail: Creation and Implementation of Post-Tenure Review at the University of Massachusetts 66 Kate Harrington The Benefits of Pilot Testing: Post-Tenure Review at California State University, Long Beach 80 Kelly S. Janousek and Wayne Dick Section II: Lessons Learned for Departments, Chairs, and Faculty The Evolution of Post-Tenure Review at Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis 97 N. Douglas Lees The Context as Key to Developing and Implementing Post-Tenure Review: The University of Nebraska-Lincoln Experience 111 Gail F. Latta and Daniel W. Wheeler Balancing Institutional Processes and State-Mandated Post-Tenure Review 141 Betsy E. Brown Transforming Post-Tenure Review Into Faculty, Department Head, and Departmental Renewal 155 Barbara Hornum Section III: Lessons Learned From Data Analysis Getting Out in Front: Cumulative Review and Development for Tenured Faculty 167 Ronald J. Henry Redesigning Post-Tenure Review to Satisfy Accreditation Requirements 178 Ann S. Hunter and Jonathan Lawson Post-Tenure Review in Texas: An Evolving Response to the Legislature's Challenge 194 Debra P. Price, Dennis Longmire, Frank Fair, Laverne Warner, Paul R. Reed, William Fleming, and Jo Ann M. Duffy Learning About Post-Tenure Review From Peer Institutions 207 Susan H. Barr Section IV: Reflections on the Future Faculty Well-Being Review: An Alternative to Post-Tenure Review? 229 Charles J. Walker A Profession at Risk: Using Post-Tenure Review to Create an Intentional Future 242 William M. Plater Conclusion Moving the Conversation Forward 261 Christine M. Licata and Joseph C. Morreale Appendix AAHE Minigrant Projects, 1998-2000 and 2000-2002 271 Preface R. Eugene Rice Director, AAHE Forum on Faculty Roles & Rewards If you want to know about post-tenure review in American col- leges and universities, this volume