Hornsea Project Three Offshore Wind Farm
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Local Government Boundary Commision for England Electoral Review of South Norfolk
SHEET 1, MAP 1 THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF SOUTH NORFOLK E Final recommendations for ward boundaries in the district of South Norfolk March 2017 Sheet 1 of 1 OLD COSTESSEY COSTESSEY CP EASTON CP D C This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of the Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majestry's Stationary Office @ Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil preceedings. NEW COSTESSEY The Local Governement Boundary Commision for England GD100049926 2017. B Boundary alignment and names shown on the mapping background may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest Boundary information MARLINGFORD AND COLTON CP applied as part of this review. BAWBURGH CP BRANDON PARVA, COSTON, A RUNHALL AND WELBORNE CP EASTON BARNHAM BROOM CP BARFORD CP COLNEY CP HETHERSETT TROWSE WITH LITTLE MELTON CP NEWTON CP SURLINGHAM CP GREAT MELTON CP KIRBY BEDON CP CRINGLEFORD WRAMPLINGHAM CP CRINGLEFORD CP KIMBERLEY CP HETHERSETT CP BIXLEY CP WICKLEWOOD BRAMERTON CP ROCKLAND ST MARY CP KESWICK AND INTWOOD CP PORINGLAND, ROCKLAND FRAMINGHAM FRAMINGHAMS & TROWSE PIGOT CP H CAISTOR ST EDMUND CP H CLAXTON CP NORTH WYMONDHAM P O P C L C M V A E H R R C S E G T IN P O T ER SWARDESTON CP N HELLINGTON E T FRAMINGHAM YELVERTON P T CP KE EARL CP CP T S N O T E G EAST CARLETON CP L WICKLEWOOD CP F STOKE HOLY CROSS CP ASHBY ST MARY CP R A C ALPINGTON CP HINGHAM CP PORINGLAND CP LANGLEY WITH HARDLEY CP HINGHAM & DEOPHAM CENTRAL -
Keswick and Intwood Parish Council Meeting on 25 November 2009
Keswick and Intwood Parish Council Meeting on 25th November 2009. Minutes of the meeting held at The Reading Rooms, Keswick at 19.00. Present: Alan Gelder (AG); Joe Loades (JL); Kevin Hanner (KH); Ruth Ripman (RR); Hayley Spouge (HS) and Phillip Brooks (PB) (Clerk). Also Present: Oliver Butcher (PCSO); Tim Philpott (PCSO); and members of the public: Marguerite Russell (MR) and Olive Dick (OD). Apologies were received from: Christopher Kemp (Councillor Cringleford Ward) (CK); Garry Wheatley (Councillor Cringleford Ward) (GW) and Daniel Cox (Norfolk County Councillor) (DC). 1. To consider apologies for absence: Resolved to accept apologies from Lars Tibell (LT) and Diana Bulman (DB) both unavoidable away from Norwich. AG said that DB had informed him that she would be resigning from the Council because of the amount of time she was now spending away from Norwich. Kevin Hanner was co-opted as a member of the Parish Council. PB reminded the Council that this was the last declared meeting before AG resigned his position as Councillor and Chairman in the New Year. RR said she was willing to assume the position on AG’s resignation. 2. To receive declaration of interests in items on the Agenda: No interests were declared. 3. Public Participation. It was resolved to adjourn the meeting for public participation: MR said she was concerned about the track and path through Big Wood which had been blocked to walkers by gates installed by the landowner. They were regularly used for leisure walking (OD indicated there had been contact with the Ramblers Association in this regard) but they were also functional in providing a safe route on foot between Keswick New Hall and Low Road. -
Response to Wiltshire Core Strategy Focused Consultation
Response to Wiltshire Core Strategy Focused Consultation Amendment to Core Policy 42 on Standalone Renewable Energy Installations, Proposed Change Reference 180 THE CASE FOR MINIMUM DISTANCE EXCLUSION ZONES AROUND DWELLINGS This representation relates to Wiltshire Council’s “Schedules of Proposed Changes to the Wiltshire Core Strategy Pre-Submission Document”. We consider the consultation material being commented on is legally compliant and sound. We support the Amendment to Core Policy 42, Proposed Change Reference 180, and wish to be part of the Examination Process. This Response Document has been prepared by the STOP GRANGE FARM WIND FARM campaign group, c/o Elizabeth Winchcombe, Secretary SGFWF, West Ashton Village Hall, Bratton Road, West Ashton, Trowbridge, Wiltshire BA14 6AZ. Email: [email protected] Mrs Carole Tocher (resident near a single turbine at Roscarnick Farm, Blackwater, Cornwall) Letter appearing in local press, West Briton, nr Truro, Cornwall 27 Sept 2012 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ONSHORE LARGE WIND TURBINES : SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM DWELLINGS (WILTS) OCT 2012 Page 1 FOR WILTSHIRE COUNCIL : CORE STRATEGY CONSULTATION 2012 Renewable Energy: Onshore Wind – Large Wind Turbines Separation Distances THE CASE FOR MINIMUM DISTANCE EXCLUSION ZONES AROUND DWELLINGS CONTENTS Page Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 The Issues Medical Reviews 5 Noise, Low-Frequency Noise (LFN) & Light Effects 7 Turbine Failures & Physical Danger 10 Community -
Norfolk Through a Lens
NORFOLK THROUGH A LENS A guide to the Photographic Collections held by Norfolk Library & Information Service 2 NORFOLK THROUGH A LENS A guide to the Photographic Collections held by Norfolk Library & Information Service History and Background The systematic collecting of photographs of Norfolk really began in 1913 when the Norfolk Photographic Survey was formed, although there are many images in the collection which date from shortly after the invention of photography (during the 1840s) and a great deal which are late Victorian. In less than one year over a thousand photographs were deposited in Norwich Library and by the mid- 1990s the collection had expanded to 30,000 prints and a similar number of negatives. The devastating Norwich library fire of 1994 destroyed around 15,000 Norwich prints, some of which were early images. Fortunately, many of the most important images were copied before the fire and those copies have since been purchased and returned to the library holdings. In 1999 a very successful public appeal was launched to replace parts of the lost archive and expand the collection. Today the collection (which was based upon the survey) contains a huge variety of material from amateur and informal work to commercial pictures. This includes newspaper reportage, portraiture, building and landscape surveys, tourism and advertising. There is work by the pioneers of photography in the region; there are collections by talented and dedicated amateurs as well as professional art photographers and early female practitioners such as Olive Edis, Viola Grimes and Edith Flowerdew. More recent images of Norfolk life are now beginning to filter in, such as a village survey of Ashwellthorpe by Richard Tilbrook from 1977, groups of Norwich punks and Norfolk fairs from the 1980s by Paul Harley and re-development images post 1990s. -
Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Consultation Report Appendix 20.3 Socc Stakeholder Mailing List
Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Consultation Report Appendix 20.3 SoCC Stakeholder Mailing List Applicant: Norfolk Vanguard Limited Document Reference: 5.1 Pursuant to APFP Regulation: 5(2)(q) Date: June 2018 Revision: Version 1 Author: BECG Photo: Kentish Flats Offshore Wind Farm This page is intentionally blank. Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Appendices Parish Councils Bacton and Edingthorpe Parish Council Witton and Ridlington Parish Council Brandiston Parish Council Guestwick Parish Council Little Witchingham Parish Council Marsham Parish Council Twyford Parish Council Lexham Parish Council Yaxham Parish Council Whinburgh and Westfield Parish Council Holme Hale Parish Council Bintree Parish Council North Tuddenham Parish Council Colkirk Parish Council Sporle with Palgrave Parish Council Shipdham Parish Council Bradenham Parish Council Paston Parish Council Worstead Parish Council Swanton Abbott Parish Council Alby with Thwaite Parish Council Skeyton Parish Council Melton Constable Parish Council Thurning Parish Council Pudding Norton Parish Council East Ruston Parish Council Hanworth Parish Council Briston Parish Council Kempstone Parish Council Brisley Parish Council Ingworth Parish Council Westwick Parish Council Stibbard Parish Council Themelthorpe Parish Council Burgh and Tuttington Parish Council Blickling Parish Council Oulton Parish Council Wood Dalling Parish Council Salle Parish Council Booton Parish Council Great Witchingham Parish Council Aylsham Town Council Heydon Parish Council Foulsham Parish Council Reepham -
The Cromer Moraine
THE CROMER MORAINE - A STUDY OF ITS PROGRESSIVE RECLAMATION ELIZABETH LANGTON ProQuest Number: 10097240 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10097240 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ilBSTRAGT The Cromer Moraine forms a distinctive geographical region near the coast of the northern part of the County of Norfolk. A pro nounced characteristic of this region is the vridespread cover of heatb-land, far less extensive than in former times. This heathland appears in its turn to have developed from an original woodland cover which was destroyed by the depredations of man and his domesticated animals . It has been necessary first to delimit the region as accurately as possible and this has been accomplished by means of a detailed study of local topography and of well-sections. The earliest evidence of the location of heathland comes from tlie Domesday Survey and this has been confirmed by references to heathland in various other documents dovm to 1750. By the middle of the eighteenth century the new developments in agriculture^ or ’Norfolk Husbandry’ as it was called, became widely known and practised, resulting in this region in a greatly accelerated reclama tion of heathland; so that by the time of the Tithe Survey (183S-42) less than a hundred years later over 4000 acres of heath had been reclaimed. -
Bat and Nesting Bird Survey for Proposed Barn Conversion at Grange Farm, Dereham Road, Pettywell, Norfolk, Nr10 4Rn
BAT AND NESTING BIRD SURVEY FOR PROPOSED BARN CONVERSION AT GRANGE FARM, DEREHAM ROAD, PETTYWELL, NORFOLK, NR10 4RN Report produced by Client details James Hodson BSc MSc Alan Rawlings Architecture Eco-Check Consultancy Ltd, Stable Cottage Greystones, Bell Inn Yard Horning Road West, The Street Hoveton, Bawdeswell NR12 8QH NR20 4RR Tel/ 01603 784905 -07914 130493 Contact: Alan Rawlings [email protected] [email protected] JULY 2016 1 Eco-Check Consultancy Ltd, Protected Species Survey at Grange Farm, Dereham Road, Pettywell, Norfolk, NR10 4RN CONTENTS: 1.0 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………. 3 2.0 AIM OF SURVEY.......................................................................................................... 3 3.0 LEGAL STATUS……….................................................................................................. 4 3.1 Barn Owls……………………………….………………………………………………….. 4 3.2 Bats…………………………………………..………………………………………………. 4 3.3 European Protected Species (EPS) Licensing……………………………………….. 5 4.0 SITE LOCATION……………………………………………………..................................... 5 5.0 SITE DESCRIPTION……………………………………………........................................... 6 5.3 Barn A Construction……………………………………………………………………….. 6 5.4 Barn B Construction……………………………………………………………………….. 8 6.0 DESK STUDY AND SITE ASSESSMENT…………………………........................................ 9 6.1 Statutory Sites…………………….……………………………………………………….. 9 6.2 Non-Statutory Sites……………………………………………………………………….. 9 6.3 Bat Records……………………………………………………………………………….. 10 7.0 -
Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office
Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office This list summarises the Norfolk Record Office’s (NRO’s) holdings of parish (Church of England) registers and of transcripts and other copies of them. Parish Registers The NRO holds registers of baptisms, marriages, burials and banns of marriage for most parishes in the Diocese of Norwich (including Suffolk parishes in and near Lowestoft in the deanery of Lothingland) and part of the Diocese of Ely in south-west Norfolk (parishes in the deanery of Fincham and Feltwell). Some Norfolk parish records remain in the churches, especially more recent registers, which may be still in use. In the extreme west of the county, records for parishes in the deanery of Wisbech Lynn Marshland are deposited in the Wisbech and Fenland Museum, whilst Welney parish records are at the Cambridgeshire Record Office. The covering dates of registers in the following list do not conceal any gaps of more than ten years; for the populous urban parishes (such as Great Yarmouth) smaller gaps are indicated. Whenever microfiche or microfilm copies are available they must be used in place of the original registers, some of which are unfit for production. A few parish registers have been digitally photographed and the images are available on computers in the NRO's searchroom. The digital images were produced as a result of partnership projects with other groups and organizations, so we are not able to supply copies of whole registers (either as hard copies or on CD or in any other digital format), although in most cases we have permission to provide printout copies of individual entries. -
Transparency Report
Transparency Report Transparency Report Government’s land and property disposals in 2015-16 and 2016-17 April 2018 1 Transparency Report 2 Transparency Report Transparency Report Government’s land and property disposals in 2015-16 and 2016-17 April 2018 3 Transparency Report © Crown copyright 2013 Produced by Cabinet Office You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or email: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Alternative format versions of this report are available on request from: [email protected] 4 Transparency Report Contents Introduction 7 Policy context 8 Land sales headlines 9 Details of assets sold 10 Appendix 1: Disposals guidance 82 Appendix 2: Transparency Review 82 Appendix 3: Glossary of terms 83 5 Transparency Report 6 Transparency Report Introduction The disposal of surplus government owned property is an important part of the Government’s drive to improve its estate management and create an efficient, fit-for-purpose and sustainable estate that meets future needs. This means disposing of surplus land and buildings in a way that delivers value for the taxpayer, boosts growth and delivers new homes. The Government has committed to freeing up land with capacity for at least 160,000 homes by 2020 and raising at least £5 billion from land and property disposals by 2020. -
The Impact of Wind Turbine Noise on Health
Wind Turbines and Proximity to Homes: The Impact of Wind Turbine Noise on Health a review of the literature & discussion of the issues by Barbara J Frey, BA, MA (University of Minnesota) & Peter J Hadden, BSc (Est Man), FRICS January 2012 Health is a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being, and not merely the absence of disease and infirmity. -- The World Health Organization Charter The objective of science is not agreement on a course of action, but the pursuit of truth. -- John Kay (2007) First, Do No Harm. -- The Hippocratic Oath Table of Contents Acknowledgements 3 Preface 4 Introduction 5 Chapter 1 Wind Turbines built near Homes: the Effects on People 8 Appendix 1: People’s Health Experiences: Additional References 21 Chapter 2 Wind Turbine Noise and Guidance 22 2.1 Wind turbine noise 22 2.2 Wind turbine noise guidance 38 2.3 Wind turbine noise: Guidance process 43 2.4 Wind turbine noise: Low frequency noise (LFN) 54 2.5 Wind turbine noise: Amplitude modulation (AM) 60 Appendix 2: Wind Turbine Noise & Guidance: Additional References 65 Chapter 3 Wind Turbine Noise: Impacts on Health 67 3.1 Wind turbine noise and its impacts on health, sleep, and cognition 67 3.2 Wind turbine noise: Clinical studies and counterclaims 92 Appendix 3.1 Health: International Perspectives 101 Appendix 3.2 Health: Additional References 102 Chapter 4 Wind Turbine Noise and Human Rights 103 4.1 Potential violations 103 4.2 The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights 112 4.3 State Indifference to Human Rights: -
River Wensum Restoration Strategy
Appendix 2 Mill summary sheets HELLESDON MILL Table Ba1 Hellesdon Mill Location Mill name: Hellesdon Mill National grid reference: 619800, 310500 Upstream catchment area: 650km2 Length of channel to next mill upstream: 5km Geomorphological Appraisal (2006) reaches: W50 River Wensum Restoration Strategy reach RWRS 01 code: Mill owner: Environment Agency (site only, mill buildings demolished) Sluice owner: Environment Agency Owner of water rights: Environment Agency Listed status: None Plate Ba1 Left: View of one of the fixed weirs at Hellesdon Mill: Right: Hellesdon Mill viewed from downstream 234 Table Ba2 Hellesdon Mill Weir & channel details Water control level: 3.85m AOD Drop: 1.21m (to 2.64m AOD) Length of backwater 5km (100% reach) upstream: Main structure: Block A: 1 flume with a steel control sluice and a horizontal steel penstock plus 3 fixed weirs with stop-log facilities and weed screens; Block B: An automated, bottom hinged overshot tilting gate. Invert 2.52m AOD Operation of main Block A: Permits majority of flow to enter the section below the mill. Sluice only structure: used during high flows in conjunction with Tud sluices; Block B: Controls mean water level upstream in the River Wensum. By-pass structure: Tud sluice acts as bypass channel - see below By-pass structure Automated operation: Gauging station: None Table Ba3 Hellesdon Mill Previous works or recommendations Previous measures: Sluice connecting the River Wensum to the River Tud (about 100m upstream of the main sluices) was automated in 1999. This allows the Environment Agency to accurately maintain water levels upstream of the mill. Geomorphological De-silt reach. -
July/August 2014 New Water Main Will Mean Dereham Road Closures
FREEREEPHAM LIFE YOUR Community Newspaper www.reephamlife.co.uk No. 15 July/August 2014 New water main will mean Dereham Road closures ANGLIAN Water plans to install a new Townsend Corner and Smugglers Lane, imum of B-classified roads.” water main for Reepham, which will in- a second stage will be between Smug- There is no announcement of the tim- volve the closure of Dereham Road glers Lane and Park Lane, and the third ings yet, but Mr Bretton said Anglian Wa- (B1145). The work is scheduled to start will be between Park Lane and the Old ter will try to avoid road closures in De- later this year and extend into 2015. Cart House (formerly Blossom Barn), cember “for obvious reasons”. The company says this will help boost wa- some 100 metres west of Park Lane. The company said it will publicise the ter supplies for Reepham, making the town According to pipeline engineer Chris scheme nearer the time and will be mak- less dependent on its Salle works, through Bretton, Anglian Water is currently in dis- ing contact with local businesses and in- the investment in a 5-km pipe line from Fak- cussions with Norfolk County Council forming residents immediately affected by enham Road, Sparham, across country Highways regarding timings and diversion the works of the timings and “what they (crossing Marriott’s Way) to the town centre. routes, but confirmed that the official di- can expect”. As part of the works the plan involves version will be a long one, “as we can- The plans note that Dereham Road is closing Dereham Road in three stages.