Progress Report for the Great Lakes Automotive Pollution Prevention Project September 1995

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Progress Report for the Great Lakes Automotive Pollution Prevention Project September 1995 1, CHRYSLER VAf CORPORATION A VOLUNTARY PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT General MO tors TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT! Printed on Recycled Paper @ FOREWORD The Great Lakes Automotive Pollution Prevention Project (Auto Project) is a partnership between government and the automotive industry to promote pollution prevention. The Auto Project originated from the Council of Great Lakes Governor's Pollution Prevention Challenge. On September 24, 1991, Chrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company and General Motors Corporation, with their trade association, the American Automobile Manufacturers Association (AAMA) agreed with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) to a voluntary pollution prevention action plan to reduce the generation and release of persistent toxic substances that adversely affect water quality in the Great Lakes. This is the second progress report on the status and accomplishments of the Auto Project, the first was published in February 1994. The first report received wide distribution, which created the need to produce periodic updates on the Auto Project's achievements and its futurp direction. This report provides an overview of some of the key accomplishments of the Auto Project with an emphasis on the activities that have been implemented between October 1993 and July 1995. It also includes data on the release of the Great Lakes Persistent Toxics substances identified by the Project. The Auto Project demonstrates the benefits of a voluntary partnership between industry and government. The parties within the Auto Project pledge their continued support for implementation of the Agreement and renew their commitment to communicate progress to the public. CHRYSLER CORPORATION FORD MOTOR COMPANY GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Auto Project Progress Report II September 1995 Page 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Auto Companies, AAMA, and MDNR wish to thank the Auto Project Advisory Group for providing advice to the Auto Project partners and facilitating public information exchange. Appreciation is also expressed to the Great Lakes National Program Office of the U.S. EPA for providing MDNR with financial support for the project. Piinting Specifications: Cover: 80 Ib. 100% recycled, 100% post-consumer, non-coated, chlorine free Paper: 50 Ib. 100% recycled, 100% post-consumer, non-coated, chlorine free Ink: Soy Based Contacts for Additional Information: The AAMA and the State of Michigan are pleased to provide this Auto Project Progress Report. Please address any questions in writing to Ms. Marcia Horan, Environmental Assistance Division, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 30457, Lansing, MI 48909, or Mr. Lawrence E. Slimak, AAMA, 7430 Second Ave., Suite 300, Detroit, MI 48202. For copies of automotive industry case studies, contact the Environmental Assistance Division of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. Within Michigan, call 1-800- 662-9278. Outside of Michigan, call (517) 373-9400. Auto Project Progress Report II September 1995 Page 2 Progress Report forthe Great Lakes Automotive Pollution Prevention Project TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Overview 4 II. Progress Measurements 5 Ill. Other Accomplishments and Activities 11 Past Acco mpl ish men ts 11 . Ongoing Activities 11 Case Studies 12 Supplier Outreach and Technology Transfer 12 Auto Project Advisory Group 14 U.S./ Canadian Coordination 14 Pollution Prevention Internships 15 External Pollution Prevention Efforts 15 MDNR Accomplishments and Related Activities 16 IV. Auto Companies Internal Pollution Prevention Practices 17 V. Future Direction 19 U.S. Auto Project Pollution Prevention Mission Statement 20 U.S. Auto Project Pollution Prevention Operating Guidelines 20 Appendices : A. Auto Project Agreement and Map of Automotive Facilities in the Great Lakes Region B. List of Great Lakes Persistent Toxics (GLPTs) C. List of Plants with Reportable Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) Releases D. Combined Company GLPT-TRI Data and AAMA Member U.S. Production, 1980-1994 E. General Process for Pollution Prevention at AAMA Member Companies F. Company Environmental Strategy Statements G. Auto Project Advisory Group and Auto Project Work Group Members H. Auto Industry Case Studies: Synopsis Table and Thirty-three Case Studies I. Highlights of Historical Pollution Prevention Efforts J: List of United States Consortium for Automotive Research (USCAR) Projects Auto Project Progress Report II September 1995 Page 3 Progress Report for the Great Lakes Automotive Pollution Prevention Project September 1995 1. OVERVIEW The Auto Project is a voluntary agreement between Chrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, and General Motors Corporation (Auto Companies), their trade association, the American Automobile Manufacturers Association (AAMA), the eight Great Lakes states represented by the State of Michigan, and the U.S. EPA. The Auto Project was initiated in September 1991. Its goals are to: Identify Great Lakes Persistent Toxic (GLPT) substances and reduce their generation and release Advance pollution prevention within the auto industry and its supplier base Address regulatory barriers that inhibit pollution prevention actions. The Auto Project is managed jointly by the Environmental Assistance Division, Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) and the AAMA on behalf of the Auto Companies. The participation of the MDNRl is supported in part with a grant from the U.S EPA Great Lakes National Program Office. The AAMA, the Auto Companies, and the State of Michigan are pleased to report the results and continuing progress of the Auto Project. Since 1991, the year the Auto Project began, releases of the 65 listed GLPT substances from Auto Company facilities (as reported in the U.S. EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) report) have declined, with the exception of 1994. In 1994, 181 member company facilities reported GLPT releases totaling 23.01 million pounds. Two foundries recycling zinc galvanized metal accounted for nearly half of the total reported GLPT releases. When normalized for vehicle production volumes, overall releases of GLPTs to the environment have been lowered by 15 percent. This represents a reduction of 0.40 pounds of releases for every vehicle manufactured in AAMA Member U.S. facilities. If the reported releases of zinc at the two foundries are excluded from the data, releases of GLPTs decreased by 37%, and by 55% when normalized for vehicle production volumes. These reductions have been mainly accomplished through the use of specific pollution prevention actions, process improvements, and recycling as explained in detail in the Auto Project case studies in Appendix H. Other release reductions have been achieved through the use of control equipment and treatment processes. The Auto Project activities are guided by the agreement and established in detail through periodic meetings of Auto Company, AAMA and MDNR representatives who make up the Effective October 1, 1995, the environmental activities of the MDNR will be placed in the newly established Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ). Auto Project Progress Report II September 1995 Page 4 Auto Project Work Group (Appendix G). The Work Group is responsible for developing communication materials, planning pollution prevention workshops and conferences, identifying regulatory barriers to pollution prevention, coordinating efforts with the Canadian Auto Project, and maintaining the external Auto Project Advisory Group. The Auto Companies are responsible for undertaking pollution prevention within their operations and for developing case study materials that are published and distributed by MDNR. The AAMA, Auto Companies, and MDNR jointly promote pollution prevention technology transfer with a particular emphasis on the auto supplier sector. The MDNR is responsible for coordinating its efforts with the other Great Lakes states and with the U.S. EPA. The Auto Project has represented a new way of doing business. It has provided an example of how a flexible, voluntary and cooperative governmenVindustry environmental initiative can reconcile and achieve our mutual environmental and economic needs in a globally competitive marketplace. All parties to the agreement have benefited from new working relationships, additional knowledge, and improved management systems from their participation in the Auto Project. Future activities will capitalize and expand on these valued experiences. II. PROGRESS MEASUREMENTS As previously discussed in the Overview section, releases of the GLPT substances from Auto Company facilities (as reported in the U.S. EPA TRI report) have declined, with the exception of 1994. When normalized for vehicle production volumes, releases of Auto Project GLPTs to the environment have been lowered by 15 percent between 1991 and 1994. This represents a reduction of 0.40 pounds of releases for every vehicle manufactured in AAMA Member U.S. facilities. The production data used for normalizing release information in this report is provided in Appendix D. The reported TRI releases from 181 Auto Company facilities are included in the data for this report. The reported releases of zinc from two Auto Company foundries accounted for nearly half of all GLPT releases in 1994. Foundries have increased their use of recycled scrap sheet metal that contains higher quantities of zinc. Higher zinc TRI releases may be due to the Auto Companies’ increasing reliance on and recycling of galvanized steel for body panel
Recommended publications
  • Final Progress Report
    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: Chrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation and the American Automobile Manufacturers Association (AAMA) thank the Advisory Group members for their advice and support during the US Auto Project. The Auto Companies and AAMA also acknowledge the guidance and counsel provided by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), US EPA Region V, and the Council of Great Lakes Governors (CGLG). PRINTING SPECIFICATIONS: Cover: 80 lb. 100 percent recycled, 100 percent post-consumer, non-coated, chlorine free Paper: 24 lb. 100 percent recycled, 100 percent post-consumer, non-coated, chlorine free Ink: Soy-based Reproduced by Michigan Great Printers Project participant CONTACTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: For hard copies of the US Automotive Pollution Prevention Project Final Progress Report, contact Chrysler, Ford, or General Motors at the addresses listed below or the Environmental Assistance Division of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality at 1-800-662-9278. Chrysler Ford Debby Rowe, CIMS 482-00-51 Sue Rokosz Chrysler Corporation Ford Motor Company 800 Chrysler Drive Parklane Towers East, Suite 1400 Auburn Hills, MI 48326-2757 One Parklane Blvd. [email protected] Dearborn, MI 48126 [email protected] General Motors MDEQ Sandra Brewer, 482-303-300 Marcia Horan General Motors Corporation Environmental Assistance Division 465 W. Milwaukee Ave. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Detroit, MI 48202 P.O. Box 30457 [email protected] Lansing, MI 48909 [email protected] INTERNET ACCESS: The US Auto Project Final Progress Report and pollution prevention industry case studies can be accessed at the MDEQ internet web site: http://www.deq.state.mi.us/ead/p2sect/auto/ US Auto Project Final Progress Report - November 1998 Page i Final Progress Report US Automotive Pollution Prevention Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary iv I.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford Motor Company Motor Ford PROFITABLE GROWTH for ALL for GROWTH PROFITABLE DELIVERING
    Ford Motor Company Motor Ford Ford Motor Company One American Road Dearborn, MI 48126 www.corporate.ford.com Ford Motor Company 2014 Annual Report 2014 Annual Report Annual 2014 DELIVERING PROFITABLE GROWTH FOR ALL Printed in U.S.A. 10% post-consumer waste paper. Ford encourages you to please recycle this document. CFEC-00022_2015_Corporate_Annual_Report_Cover_C12.indd 1 3/16/15 7:14 PM On the Cover FORD EDGE Ford Motor Company in Operating Highlights My father was 2014 revealed an all-new “ Key Metrics (in billions, except for percentages) 2014 2013 Ford Edge, redesigned a business leader, from wheels to roof to set Automotive a new standard among a philanthropist and midsize utilities. The new Revenue $ 135.8 $ 139.4 Edge is more athletic than a devoted family man Operating margin (a) 5.4% ever, with added features 3.9% who did great things and technologies for a Operating-related cash flow (b) $ 3.6 $ 6.1 more rewarding driving experience. Launching Ford Credit without great fanfare in markets worldwide, Executive Chairman Bill Ford ” Pre-tax profit $ 1.9 $ 1.8 including Europe, the new Edge will offer drivers two Total Company EcoBoost® engine options. And a three-row, seven- Pre-tax profit (b) $ 6.3 $ 8.6 seat Edge debuted in 2014 to meet the specific Amounts Attributable to Ford Motor Company (in millions) needs of drivers in China. Net income $ 3,187 $ 7,182 Pictured on the back cover (counterclockwise from top right) are: Ford Cash and Spending (in billions) Everest, Escort, Ka, F-150 Automotive cash at year end and Lincoln MKX.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Auto Project Progress Report - December 2000 I Inaugural Progress Report Michigan Automotive Pollution Prevention Project
    A VOLUNTARY POLLUTION PREVENTION AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP ADMINISTERED BY: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Assistance Division DECEMBER, 2000: 1st ISSUE John Engler, Governor • Russell J. Harding, Director www.deq.state.mi.us ACKNOWLEDGMENTS DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation and the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) thank the Auto Project Stakeholder Group members for providing advice to the Auto Project partners and facilitating public information exchange. The Auto Companies and MDEQ also acknowledge the guidance and counsel provided by the US EPA Region V. CONTACTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION For information regarding the Michigan Automotive Pollution Prevention Project Progress Report, contact DaimlerChrysler, Ford, or General Motors at the addresses listed below or the Environmental Assistance Division of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality at 1-800-662-9278. DaimlerChrysler Ford Doug Orf, CIMS 482-00-51 Sue Rokosz DaimlerChrysler Corporation Ford Motor Company 800 Chrysler Drive One Parklane Blvd., Suite 1400 Auburn Hills, MI 48326-2757 Dearborn, MI 48126 [email protected] [email protected] General Motors MDEQ Sandra Brewer, 482-303-300 Anita Singh Welch General Motors Corporation Environmental Assistance Division 465 W. Milwaukee Ave. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Detroit, MI 48202 P.O. Box 30457 [email protected] Lansing, MI 48909 [email protected] Michigan Auto Project Progress Report - December 2000 i Inaugural Progress Report Michigan Automotive Pollution Prevention Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Foreward iv I. Executive Summary Project Overview 1 Activities and Accomplishments 4 Focus on Michigan 11 Auto Company Profiles II. DaimlerChrysler Corporation Project Status 12 Activities and Accomplishments 14 Focus on Michigan 16 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford Media Center Ford Media Center FORD MOTOR COMPANY ISSUES FOUR SAFETY RECALLS in NORTH AMERICA
    8/30/2019 Ford Motor Company Issues Four Safety Recalls in North America | Ford Media Center Ford Media Center FORD MOTOR COMPANY ISSUES FOUR SAFETY RECALLS IN NORTH AMERICA Aug 30, 2019 | DEARBORN, Mich. DEARBORN, Mich., Aug. 30, 2019 – Ford Motor Company is issuing four safety recalls in North America. Ford is not aware of any accidents or injuries associated with any of these conditions. Safety recall of select vehicles for potential lack of seat restraint in the event of a crash Ford is issuing a safety recall for: 1. Certain 2018-20 Ford F-150, 2019-20 Ford F-Series Super Duty, 2018-19 Ford Explorer and 2019-20 Ford Expedition vehicles with a manual driver and/or front passenger seat-back recliner mechanism, and 2. Certain 2020 Ford Explorer and 2020 Lincoln Aviator vehicles with rear outboard seats with manual seat-back recliner mechanisms. Affected vehicles may be missing the third pawl required for seatback strength. A seatback with an improperly assembled recliner mechanism may have reduced strength and may not adequately restrain an occupant in a crash, increasing the risk of injury. This action affects 483,325 vehicles in the United States and federal territories, 58,712 in Canada and 8,149 in Mexico. Affected vehicles include: 2018-20 Ford F-150 vehicles built at: Dearborn Assembly Plant from Sept. 14, 2018, to Aug. 7, 2019, and Kansas City Assembly Plant from Sept. 11, 2018, through Aug. 2, 2019 2019-20 Ford F-Series Super Duty vehicles built at: Kentucky Assembly Plant from Sept. 9, 2018, through July 22, 2019, and Ohio Assembly Plant from Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA Regulated PCB Transformer Data
    A B C D E F G H I J K Transformers Containing Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Database Last Modified: 13-Sep-19 1 Number Date De-Registered/ Number Original Date Registered Remaining Company Street City State Zip Contact Name Contact Phone Latest Removal Date Transformers 2 Transformers 3 12-Jan-06 15 15 30 RMS/RMR (Tetra Tech, Inc) 816 13th Street, Suite 207, BuiVAFB CA 93437-5212Steven L. Daly 805-605-7336 4 12-Jan-06 31 31 30 RMS/RMR (Tetra Tech, Inc) 816 13th Street, Suite 207, BuiVAFB CA 93437-5212Steven L. Daly 805-605-7336 5 10-Apr-06 32 32 30 RMS/RMR (Tetra Tech, Inc) 816 13th Street, Suite 207, BuiVAFB CA 93437-5212Steven L. Daly 805-605-7336 6 16-Dec-98 35 35 3448US Army Armor Center and Fort Knox Not Provided Fort Knox KY 40121-5000Louis Barnhart 502-624-3629 7 9-Mar-18 2 2 83 Griffith St, LLC 3333 Allen Parkway Salem NJ 08079 Harold Polk (346) 970-8909 8 21-Dec-98 1 1 AAF International 215 Central Ave. Louisville KY 40208 Ron Unthank 502-637-0221 9 21-Dec-98 1 1 AAF International 215 Central Ave. Louisville KY 40208 Ron Unthank 502-637-0221 10 26-Jan-10 12 12 Abitibi Bowater (Formerly US Alliance Coos17589 Plant Road Coosa PinesAL 35044 Brian Smith 256-378-2126 11 20-Oct-08 13 13 Acero Junction Inc. (FKA Severstal Wheelin1134 Market Street Wheeling WV 26003 Patrick J. Smith 740-283-5542 12 3-Dec-98 2 2 Acme Steel Company 13500 S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Message to UAW Members at Ford
    FORD CONTRACT SUMMARY: HOURLY WORKERS NOVEMBER 2019 HIGHLIGHTS ● New Jobs/New Investments: Over $6 billion of product investment creating or re- taining over 8,500 jobs. Nineteen facilities will receive investments. ● Ratification Bonus: The contract establish- es a ratification bonus of $9,000 for senior- ity employees and $3,500 for temporary employees. ● Wage increases: The contract provides for 3% GWIs in the second and fourth years of the contract and 4% lump sums in the first and third years for eligible permanent seniority employees. The 2019 UAW Ford Hourly National Negotiating Committee. ● Health Care: There will be no reduction in health care benefits or increase in costs to members. New discount costs for retail clinics and telemedicine. ● Temporary Workers: Current temporary A Message to UAW Members workers are eligible to become full-time seniority employees with the potential to reach top rate during the life of the con- at Ford tract. Dear Brothers and Sisters: ● Progression: All current permanent employees will grow in to parity in the life of the contract. Your bargaining committee appreciates the solidarity of our membership ● Profit Sharing Formula Maintained as we worked to achieve key gains through the collective bargaining pro- cess. ● Pension/TESPHE: A one-time contribution of $1,000 to the Tax-Efficient Savings Plan From the outset, your brothers and sisters, Local leaders, and bargaining for Hourly Employees (TESPHE) accounts team members identified key areas of concern to focus on throughout this for employees hired or rehired before Nov. process: a clear pathway for temporary workers to permanent status, short- 19, 2007 or in a skilled classification prior ening the in-progression period, maintaining our current health care benefits to Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford Motor Company VIN Equipment Codes
    Report Abuse « Search: The Web Angelfire Previous | Top 100 | Next » share: del.icio.us | digg | reddit | furl | Ford Excursion+Vin facebook Ads by Google Check Any Vehicle VIN 2010 Ford Official Site Car Search By VIN Number Disc Makers CD Services Vehicle Record Check. Get Unbiased Visit the Official Ford Site Now for the Info You Need At Recession-Proof 1000 CDs in Digipaks now $990! Automotive Information Latest Ford vehicle Info. Prices. Get More, Spend Less! Lowest price, highest quality. www.edmunds.com www.FordVehicles.com www.AutoCheck.com www.discmakers.com/DigipakSale Ford Motor Company VIN Equipment Codes Last updated September 7th, 2005 4th digit 5th digit - line 6th digit - series passenger cars - restraints A minivan trucks active belts plus driver and A20 - Mercury Mountaineer 0 150 series Flareside B A5 - Windstar & Freestar passenger air bags 150 series Styleside & E-Series chassis 1 active belts plus driver and C Econoline F Econoline chassis passenger air bags E-Series cargo van 2 250 series E active belts plus driver and Econoline cargo van 3 350 series H passenger side air bags, F F-series pick-up, regular cab 4 Super Duty series curtains, or canopies M Lincoln & Mercury cars active belts plus driver and K M5 - Mercury Sable sport-utility vehicles passenger air bags M6 - Mercury Mystique M7 - Mercury Grand Marquis & 2 2-door Explorer Mercury Marauder 3 4-door Explorer trucks - Gross Vehicle M81 - Lincoln Town Car Weight Rating (GVWR) M83 - Lincoln Town Car 5 4-door Mountaineer M84 - Lincoln Town Car A 0-3,000 lbs. M85 - Lincoln Town Car B 3,001-4,000 lbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 573 Safety Recall Report 20V-575
    OMB Control No.: 2127-0004 Part 573 Safety Recall Report 20V-575 Manufacturer Name : Ford Motor Company Submission Date : SEP 23, 2020 NHTSA Recall No. : 20V-575 Manufacturer Recall No. : 20C19 Manufacturer Information : Population : Manufacturer Name : Ford Motor Company Number of potentially involved : 620,246 Address : 330 Town Center Drive Estimated percentage with defect : 47 % Suite 500 Dearborn MI 48126-2738 Company phone : 1-866-436-7332 Vehicle Information : Vehicle 1 : 2020-2020 Ford F150 Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : ALL Power Train : NR Descriptive Information : The recalled part was introduced into production on 10/26/2019 at the Dearborn Assembly Plant, and was introduced into production on 11/02/2019 at the Kansas City Truck Plant. The recalled part was taken out of production on 05/18/2020. These vehicles are not produced in VIN order. Information as to the applicability of this action to specific vehicles can best be obtained by either calling Ford’s toll-free line (1-866-436-7332) or by contacting a local Ford or Lincoln dealer who can obtain specific information regarding the vehicles from the Ford On-line Automotive Service Information System (OASIS) database. 220,098 F150 vehicles are affected Production Dates : OCT 26, 2019 - MAY 18, 2020 VIN Range 1 : Begin : NR End : NR Not sequential The information contained in this report was submitted pursuant to 49 CFR §573 Part 573 Safety Recall Report 20V-575 Page 2 Vehicle 2 : 2020-2020 Ford Explorer Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : ALL Power Train : NR Descriptive Information : The recalled part was introduced into production on 11/16/2019 and was taken out of production on 05/18/2020 at the Chicago Assembly Plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Volvo D5 Volvo D5
    InterviewInterview WilliamWilliam ClayClay FordFord JnrJnr RaceRace transmissionstransmissions ImprovingImproving onon thethe veryvery bestbest VolvoVolvo D5D5 LeanLean BoostBoost TheThe world’sworld’s firstfirst all-aluminiumall-aluminium DirectDirect InjectionInjection five-cylinderfive-cylinder dieseldiesel engineengine waswas NewNew routeroute toto engineengine downsizingdownsizing developeddeveloped inin recordrecord timetime –– withwith thethe Spring 2002 helphelp ofof Ricardo Ricardo know-howknow-how Our automotive systems make driving more of a pleasure. Today’s driver expects their journey to be a much more enjoyable And we continuously improve performance by using our and productive experience. understanding of vehicle dynamics and chassis systems to create ride and handling that improves the enjoyment of any journey. To deliver this, Visteon is continuously developing the in-car environment. Our interiors, climate control, communication and Our philosophy of designing systems with the driver in mind entertainment systems are flexible enough to meet drivers’ has prompted 18 of the world’s top 20 vehicle manufacturers to individual desires and, of course, their comfort and safety needs. work with us. From an environmental perspective, our engine management To find out more about how Visteon make vehicles more of systems cut emissions without cutting back on performance. a pleasure for today’s driver, visit www.visteon.com contents 14 Spring 2002 4 8 6 NEWS FEATURES QUESTIONS & ANSWERS Industry update 4 Volvo’s new diesel 8 William Clay Ford Jnr 6 Supercharged MINI Cooper S is launched With premium diesel sales poised for take- The removal of Ford CEO Jac Nasser last supported by Ricardo engineering, Visteon off, Volvo needed its own diesel engine. November stunned the industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Sallee Speaks
    Number 36 Volume 13 No 4 October 2017 Sallee Speaks Geoff Pollard’s 37 Coupe, Victoria, Australia, refer rebuild in Para 6a) below Newsletter of the LaSalle Appreciation Society A Chapter of the Cadillac & LaSalle Club Inc. LAS No 36 Oct 2017 I suppose after the sad news I should 1. Director’s Speak give good news. The Grand National was Hello Fellow Sallyites, great fun, there were a number of LaSalles in attendance, and I was able to Just days after the last issue of Sallee speak to many of the members and a few Speaks hit the streets I received a phone who were not. Since I was judging and call on my voice mail from a highly Nancy was hosting the ladies tea and respected Cadillac- LaSalle member. fashion show, Bud and Barbara Coleman Many of you will not know his name but I ran the meeting and provided the can assure you if it wasn’t for Norm Uhlir minutes that appear elsewhere in this there would be no Cad-LaSalle Club. issue. Thank you to the Colemans for Norm Uhlir is one of the three or so covering for us. Editor John tells me that people who conceived the idea of an pictures of the LaSalles at the Grand antique car club dedicated to Cadillacs National will appear over the next few and LaSalles back in 1958 when I was issues. Chairman Ronnie Hux organized still in high school. Norm’s name remains an impressive array of activities, from on the Regional Activities Award given bus tours to a Friday night ‘Flash Back every year at the Grand National Meet to Friday’ dance party with Valley Forge any region in the U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magazine for UAW Members and Their Families Build/Buyusa Keep Communities Strong Through Consumer Action
    September - October 2017 The magazine for UAW members and their families Build/BuyUSA Keep Communities Strong Through Consumer Action The “Buy American” movement drive the legislation and regulations Buy it Here isn’t new, but it looks different of that country. In the U.S., we have Taking action is about more than from how it did in the 1970s. Back it backward: our “industrial policy” just political engagement; we can then there were almost 20 million reveals itself after tax subsidies have do so many things in our daily lives. workers making goods in factories been awarded and the decisions Shopping is one example. We look across the country. These workers are already made regarding trade, at products for good value, but made the clothes we wore, the the environment, job training, measuring that value is more than goods we bought for our homes, investment in infrastructure and just looking at the sticker price. As the televisions we watched, and education. We give companies consumers, make your voice heard by the toys our children enjoyed. We economic subsidies to build factories encouraging and commending stores shopped for and purchased these that pay our workers less than what for carrying union/USA products. goods at stores in our communities taxpayers are giving the companies Each purchase is a choice. Use the — maybe even down the block in our to locate here. power of your wallet to support neighborhood. Now, there are only Our country’s agenda should lift good-paying jobs. When you shop, 12.3 million workers making goods in everyone, not make it easier to consider these categories of goods: factories.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Century of Gmc Truck History Compiled by Donald E
    THE FIRST CENTURY OF GMC TRUCK HISTORY COMPILED BY DONALD E. MEYER INTRODUCTION GMC has been and is now one of the most successful of the pioneers in the manufacture and sales of commercial motor vehicles. The GMC brand is one of few of the original makes that have survived into the 21st century. The reputation of GMC truck quality, value, dependability and performance and the resulting user brand loyalty originated with the first roots of GMC products. It has been said that the roots of GMC Trucks go back to the 3 Rs of early truck development: Rapid, Reliance and Randolph. Truly, the first GMC trucks were Rapid or Reliance trucks with GMC nameplates. However, Randolph trucks apparently had little or no influence on GMC design. We start with the earliest root, the Rapid motor truck. CHAPTER 1: 1900 - 1919 1900 Max and Morris Grabowsky formed the Grabowsky Motor Vehicle Co. in Detroit. They started building a commercial truck prototype with a single cylinder horizontal engine, 2-speed planetary transmission and chain drive with a seat over the engine. Top speed was 10 mph and capacity was 1-ton. 1901 The Grabowsky brothers completed their first truck but while testing it found it to be under powered. They then began building a second truck powered by a 15 hp 2-cylinder horizontally opposed engine with a drivetrain similar to the protoype. 1902 Grabowsky brothers reorganized and formed Rapid Motor Vehicle Company. They sold that second truck to American Garment Cleaning Co. It probably was the first gasoline powered commercial vehicle on the streets of Detroit.
    [Show full text]