The Magazine for UAW Members and Their Families Build/Buyusa Keep Communities Strong Through Consumer Action

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Magazine for UAW Members and Their Families Build/Buyusa Keep Communities Strong Through Consumer Action September - October 2017 The magazine for UAW members and their families Build/BuyUSA Keep Communities Strong Through Consumer Action The “Buy American” movement drive the legislation and regulations Buy it Here isn’t new, but it looks different of that country. In the U.S., we have Taking action is about more than from how it did in the 1970s. Back it backward: our “industrial policy” just political engagement; we can then there were almost 20 million reveals itself after tax subsidies have do so many things in our daily lives. workers making goods in factories been awarded and the decisions Shopping is one example. We look across the country. These workers are already made regarding trade, at products for good value, but made the clothes we wore, the the environment, job training, measuring that value is more than goods we bought for our homes, investment in infrastructure and just looking at the sticker price. As the televisions we watched, and education. We give companies consumers, make your voice heard by the toys our children enjoyed. We economic subsidies to build factories encouraging and commending stores shopped for and purchased these that pay our workers less than what for carrying union/USA products. goods at stores in our communities taxpayers are giving the companies Each purchase is a choice. Use the — maybe even down the block in our to locate here. power of your wallet to support neighborhood. Now, there are only Our country’s agenda should lift good-paying jobs. When you shop, 12.3 million workers making goods in everyone, not make it easier to consider these categories of goods: factories. Neighborhood stores have Imported, Made by disappeared and our communities Nonunion Labor: have changed because we shop This is the majority of consumer online or drive to shopping centers to Bringing back goods that are imported into the U.S. buy stuff that was made thousands of These goods are sometimes cheaper, miles away — most likely by nonunion manufacturing jobs but often come with a price. Were workers who don’t have a voice in won’t be easy, but the workers who made it exploited? their workplace. we have to fight for Are there serious health and safety issues at the worksite? Build it Here our children’s and In 2017, we can’t just declare, “Buy Imported, Made by American!” because after decades grandchildren’s Union Labor: of anti-worker/pro-corporate profit Solidarity is global. In fact, the UAW policies, there’s not much made here future, and rebuild our vehicle guide includes cars made by anymore. We know making products communities that have UAW members and union brothers here builds stronger communities and sisters who are part of Unifor in because the last 30 years have lost good manufacturing Canada. But not all unions are free taught us about the importance jobs. and independent and a global union of a strong manufacturing base in label is meaningful only if those the U.S. According to a 2016 report workers truly have a seat at the by the Manufacturers Alliance table. for Productivity and Innovation, race to the bottom. This is our Made in America by one new full-time job created in government and we need to hold Nonunion Labor: manufacturing leads to three or lawmakers accountable when they It’s great that a company is building more full-time jobs in related non- don’t support policies that help it here and creating jobs. But we manufacturing industries. Bringing working families or when they favor have to go deeper to distinguish that back manufacturing jobs won’t be trade deals that exploit workers in “USA made” products are made by easy, but we have to fight for our other countries. And as we demand nonunion workers and we have to call children and grandchildren’s future, that manufacturing jobs be created out the employers who are socially and rebuild our communities that here, we have to remain mindful irresponsible. If a company engages have lost good manufacturing jobs. that not all jobs are equal. Our goal in anti-union campaigns, breaks We also need to develop a strong should be well-paying and safe jobs environmental laws, scoffs at safety industrial policy in this country. where the workers have a seat at the regulations, or takes advantage of Most developed countries have well- table. the community with no regard for thought out industrial policies that the people who’ve been living there, 2 SOLIDARITY September - October 2017 If a company engages in anti-union campaigns, breaks environmental laws, scoffs at safety regulations, or takes advantage of the community with no regard for the people who’ve been living there, there is no benefit to buying its “USA-made” products. there is no benefit to buying its flag waving. By working together, A Wagon Loaded “USA-made” products. our actions and choices can with History: Page 12 Made in America by bring change. Let’s have 2017 be DENN PIETRO PHOTO: Union Labor: the year that we get this right. Though union density in the Build/BuyUSA: Build it here, so private sector is 6.4 percent, we can buy it here. labor unions are among the 4 PRO-Member most ardent advocates for keeping jobs in the U.S. Through A Blueprint: How to collective bargaining, workers Get Our Jobs Back have a voice in their working conditions and are mindful of 6 Committee Spotlight safety on the job. Collective Union Label: What You bargaining lifts wages not only Buy Matters! for the workers covered by the contract, but also those in the area and industry. 8 Our Vehicles, Our Jobs Free trade agreements have 2018 UAW Union-Built allowed corporations to exploit Vehicles List workers in other countries at our expense in return for cheap 14 COVER STORY goods and higher profits. Asking Ammo: A Look at the people to “Buy American” makes Union Difference no sense unless there are things to buy. Furthermore, asking people to “Buy American” makes 18 Marching Across no sense if the corporation the U.S.A. treats its workers unfairly, Labor Day 2017: This is Us engages in despicable business practices, and pays low wages with no benefits. We can 22 Black Lake reward good employers with A Wonderful Setting for our purchasing power while a Wedding investing in a future for the next generation. Bringing strong, well-paid and PLUS sustainable manufacturing jobs 20 Legislative Update to the United States can happen if we demand it. We can have 24 Sportsmen’s Alliance the future we want, but it won’t 28 Union Plus happen through grandstanding or COVER ILLUSTRATION BY MATTHEW WILLIAMS SOLIDARITY September - October 2017 3 Why the Jobs Left and How to Get Them Back: A Blueprint for the Future The United States has lost over 5 million manufacturing jobs since 2000, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Economists and policy makers give multiple reasons for this steep drop in jobs that have sustained families for decades. Some factors — like the increase in automation and productivity — are inevitable. Other factors, however, are not. Offshoring of jobs does not have to be the new normal. Bringing strong, well-paid and sustainable manufacturing jobs to the United States can happen if we demand it. But we must demand it with specificity. The cry of “Build it here!” often disguises that the jobs we are bringing to our country are either low paying or the price we pay in subsidies to lure them here is too steep. What can we do today? We can start by having a common understanding of how we got here. The four reasons listed below explain our dire situation, but they also contain the seeds of how to build a better future for our communities. Productivity and Automation American manufacturing workers get better at their jobs all the time. Since 1980, the manufacturing sector has more than doubled its output, while shedding one-third of its jobs. Simply put, American manufacturing is so efficient with robots and lean manufacturing that companies make more with fewer workers. Innovation is often driven by the workers on the line who contribute to the overall success of the company. These workers should be rewarded for working harder and smarter. Efficiencies translate into profits 4 SOLIDARITY September - October 2017 and too often those are not shared with those who produced the results for corporations. Lack of Industrial Policy Most developed countries have well-thought out industrial policies that then drive the legislation and regulations of the nation. In this way, decisions about how much to invest in public education are measured against where the goals of the nation are when it comes to the kind of jobs they want to create in the future. Here in the U.S., we have it backward: Our “industrial policy” is a default position that reveals itself only after the decisions are made regarding trade, the environment, tax subsidies, job training, investment in infrastructure, education, etc. What does it say about our nation when we give companies economic subsidies to build factories that will pay our citizens less than what taxpayers are giving the companies to locate here? A strong industrial policy matters because it’s a roadmap to our future: the next generation of jobs, the opportunities for our children and the independence of we can’t do it better. In fact, can develop trade policies where Just because countless decisions are made everyone benefits. globalization is by elected officials that affect Decline in Union Density outcomes in our economy.
Recommended publications
  • 14V-409 GENERAL MOTORS LLC (3 Pages) Global Vehicle Safety
    14V-409 GENERAL MOTORS LLC (3 pages) Global Vehicle Safety July 2, 2014 Ms. Nancy Lewis Associate Administrator for Enforcement National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Recall Management Division (NVS-215) 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE – Room W45-306 Washington, DC 20590 Dear Ms. Lewis: The following information is submitted pursuant to the requirements of 49 CFR 573.6 as it applies to a determination by General Motors to conduct a safety related recall for certain 2014 model year Buick Regal, Cadillac XTS, and Chevrolet Camaro and Impala vehicles. 573.6(c)(1): Buick, Cadillac and Chevrolet Brands of General Motors Company 573.6(c)(2)(3)(4): This information is shown on the attached sheet. 573.6(c)(5): General Motors has decided that a defect, which relates to motor vehicle safety, exists in certain 2014 model year Buick Regal, Cadillac XTS, and Chevrolet Camaro and Impala vehicles. Some of these vehicles may have fasteners that are not torqued to specifications at the interface of the intermediate shaft and the steering gear and/or at the lower control arm to the lower ball joint. If these fasteners are improperly torqued, they could back out and the vehicle could exhibit loss of steering, increasing the risk of a crash. 573.6(c)(6): On March 4, 2014, GM’s Oshawa Car Assembly Plant in Ontario, Canada (“Oshawa”) learned of a warranty claim filed on December 23, 2013, at a California dealership for an Oshawa-built Chevrolet Impala related to an improperly fastened lower control arm. On that same day, Oshawa initiated a root cause investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Making It LOUD
    Making it LOUD 2011 Annual Report WWW.USFIRST.ORG1 For over 20 years, FIRST® Founder Dean Kamen and everyone associated with FIRST have been on a mission to spread President Barack Obama, along with White House Technology Officer Aneesh Chopra, continued to feature FIRST teams as perfect examples of the president’s national White the word about the many educational, societal, economical, and House Science Fair initiative promoting STEM (science, technology, engineering, and Dean Kamen will.i.am planetary benefits of getting youth and adults alike involved in theFIRST math) education and celebrating science and math achievement in American schools. Morgan Freeman experience. Despite not having access to the millions of marketing Soledad O’Brien dollars required to make FIRST a household “brand,” the program has continued to grow each year at a blistering pace. …aND loudER Books, magazines, newspapers, cable TV, and the Web helped us create noise, too, with ongoing national coverage by Bloomberg, CNN, Popular Mechanics, In 2011, however, thanks to the fervent interest of major figures Popular Science, Wired, ESPN Magazine, WallStreetJournal.com, and more. Author Neal Bascomb brought the FIRST experience to life in his inspiring in government, the media, and mainstream entertainment, the book, The New Cool.Time Warner Cable incorporated “volume” of voices promoting FIRST... FIRST into its national “Connect A Million Minds™” initiative, featuring our FRC program in its TV show “It Ain’t Rocket Science.” The clamor of FIRST recognition continues to grow ...GOT TuRNED UP loud...VERY loud! louder every day. The continuing mainstream exposure is helping propel us toward our goal of making FIRST known and recognized around the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Progress Report
    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: Chrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation and the American Automobile Manufacturers Association (AAMA) thank the Advisory Group members for their advice and support during the US Auto Project. The Auto Companies and AAMA also acknowledge the guidance and counsel provided by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), US EPA Region V, and the Council of Great Lakes Governors (CGLG). PRINTING SPECIFICATIONS: Cover: 80 lb. 100 percent recycled, 100 percent post-consumer, non-coated, chlorine free Paper: 24 lb. 100 percent recycled, 100 percent post-consumer, non-coated, chlorine free Ink: Soy-based Reproduced by Michigan Great Printers Project participant CONTACTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: For hard copies of the US Automotive Pollution Prevention Project Final Progress Report, contact Chrysler, Ford, or General Motors at the addresses listed below or the Environmental Assistance Division of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality at 1-800-662-9278. Chrysler Ford Debby Rowe, CIMS 482-00-51 Sue Rokosz Chrysler Corporation Ford Motor Company 800 Chrysler Drive Parklane Towers East, Suite 1400 Auburn Hills, MI 48326-2757 One Parklane Blvd. [email protected] Dearborn, MI 48126 [email protected] General Motors MDEQ Sandra Brewer, 482-303-300 Marcia Horan General Motors Corporation Environmental Assistance Division 465 W. Milwaukee Ave. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Detroit, MI 48202 P.O. Box 30457 [email protected] Lansing, MI 48909 [email protected] INTERNET ACCESS: The US Auto Project Final Progress Report and pollution prevention industry case studies can be accessed at the MDEQ internet web site: http://www.deq.state.mi.us/ead/p2sect/auto/ US Auto Project Final Progress Report - November 1998 Page i Final Progress Report US Automotive Pollution Prevention Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary iv I.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Auto Project Progress Report - December 2000 I Inaugural Progress Report Michigan Automotive Pollution Prevention Project
    A VOLUNTARY POLLUTION PREVENTION AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP ADMINISTERED BY: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Assistance Division DECEMBER, 2000: 1st ISSUE John Engler, Governor • Russell J. Harding, Director www.deq.state.mi.us ACKNOWLEDGMENTS DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation and the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) thank the Auto Project Stakeholder Group members for providing advice to the Auto Project partners and facilitating public information exchange. The Auto Companies and MDEQ also acknowledge the guidance and counsel provided by the US EPA Region V. CONTACTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION For information regarding the Michigan Automotive Pollution Prevention Project Progress Report, contact DaimlerChrysler, Ford, or General Motors at the addresses listed below or the Environmental Assistance Division of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality at 1-800-662-9278. DaimlerChrysler Ford Doug Orf, CIMS 482-00-51 Sue Rokosz DaimlerChrysler Corporation Ford Motor Company 800 Chrysler Drive One Parklane Blvd., Suite 1400 Auburn Hills, MI 48326-2757 Dearborn, MI 48126 [email protected] [email protected] General Motors MDEQ Sandra Brewer, 482-303-300 Anita Singh Welch General Motors Corporation Environmental Assistance Division 465 W. Milwaukee Ave. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Detroit, MI 48202 P.O. Box 30457 [email protected] Lansing, MI 48909 [email protected] Michigan Auto Project Progress Report - December 2000 i Inaugural Progress Report Michigan Automotive Pollution Prevention Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Foreward iv I. Executive Summary Project Overview 1 Activities and Accomplishments 4 Focus on Michigan 11 Auto Company Profiles II. DaimlerChrysler Corporation Project Status 12 Activities and Accomplishments 14 Focus on Michigan 16 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report for the Great Lakes Automotive Pollution Prevention Project September 1995
    1, CHRYSLER VAf CORPORATION A VOLUNTARY PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT General MO tors TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT! Printed on Recycled Paper @ FOREWORD The Great Lakes Automotive Pollution Prevention Project (Auto Project) is a partnership between government and the automotive industry to promote pollution prevention. The Auto Project originated from the Council of Great Lakes Governor's Pollution Prevention Challenge. On September 24, 1991, Chrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company and General Motors Corporation, with their trade association, the American Automobile Manufacturers Association (AAMA) agreed with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) to a voluntary pollution prevention action plan to reduce the generation and release of persistent toxic substances that adversely affect water quality in the Great Lakes. This is the second progress report on the status and accomplishments of the Auto Project, the first was published in February 1994. The first report received wide distribution, which created the need to produce periodic updates on the Auto Project's achievements and its futurp direction. This report provides an overview of some of the key accomplishments of the Auto Project with an emphasis on the activities that have been implemented between October 1993 and July 1995. It also includes data on the release of the Great Lakes Persistent Toxics substances identified by the Project. The Auto Project demonstrates the benefits of a voluntary partnership between industry and government. The parties within
    [Show full text]
  • Flint Fights Back, Environmental Justice And
    Thank you for your purchase of Flint Fights Back. We bet you can’t wait to get reading! By purchasing this book through The MIT Press, you are given special privileges that you don’t typically get through in-device purchases. For instance, we don’t lock you down to any one device, so if you want to read it on another device you own, please feel free to do so! This book belongs to: [email protected] With that being said, this book is yours to read and it’s registered to you alone — see how we’ve embedded your email address to it? This message serves as a reminder that transferring digital files such as this book to third parties is prohibited by international copyright law. We hope you enjoy your new book! Flint Fights Back Urban and Industrial Environments Series editor: Robert Gottlieb, Henry R. Luce Professor of Urban and Environmental Policy, Occidental College For a complete list of books published in this series, please see the back of the book. Flint Fights Back Environmental Justice and Democracy in the Flint Water Crisis Benjamin J. Pauli The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England © 2019 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. This book was set in Stone Serif by Westchester Publishing Services. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Pauli, Benjamin J., author.
    [Show full text]
  • New GM Recalls 2.1 Million Vehicles with Defective Ignition Switches
    Case 1:14-md-02543-JMF Document 345 Filed 10/14/14 Page 1 of 712 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------x IN RE: 14-MD-2543 (JMF) GENERAL MOTORS LLC IGNITION CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT SWITCH LITIGATION CONCERNING ALL GM-BRANDED VEHICLES THAT WERE ACQUIRED This Document Relates to All Actions JULY 11, 2009 OR LATER -------------------------------------------------x 010440-11 725144 V1 Case 1:14-md-02543-JMF Document 345 Filed 10/14/14 Page 2 of 712 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ................................................................................................8 III. PARTIES ...................................................................................................................................8 A. Plaintiffs .........................................................................................................................8 1. Melissa Cave—Alabama ...................................................................................9 2. Valeria Glenn—Alabama ...................................................................................9 3. Barbara Hill—Arizona .......................................................................................9 4. Courtney Williams—Arkansas ........................................................................10 5. Nettleton Auto Sales, Inc.—Nationwide
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Klaus Zehender Member of the Divisional Board Mercedes-Benz Cars Responsible for Procurement & Supplier Quality
    www.automotivepurchasing.com Exclusive Interview Dr. Klaus Zehender Member of the Divisional Board Mercedes-Benz Cars responsible for Procurement & Supplier Quality Bentayga January 2016 A look as the fi rst of Bentley’s super-SUV rolls o the line NEW ASTRA ˜ HUNGARY REGIONAL REPORT ˜ LIGHTWEIGHTING ‘A Global Industry in constant change, needs strong leadership’ The Automotive Leaders Summit bring together the leaders who are shaping our industry. Together they will discuss and debate; share initiatives and search for new avenues and opportunities – all in an exclusive environment. The Automotive Leaders Summit in Las Vegas will feature innovative and inspiring keynote addresses, in-depth and thought-provoking debates, focused forum discussions and private one-on-one meetings. This exclusive event, will promise attendance by top-level executives, attendees are CEOs, board members and senior executives from within the global automotive industry. Exceptional networking opportunities and access to the knowledge of what may drive, shape and affect the future design and execution of global automotive supply makes this truly a must-attend event. The Automotive Leaders Summit North America provides the opportunity for leading industry players, both domestic and international, to meet, network and debate how best to establish a practical approach to achieve common goals. The Mandarin Oriental, Las Vegas | 6-7 April 2016 www.automotiveleaderssummit.com Lunch Sponspor Event Sponspor Exclusive Gala Dinner and Awards Sponsor Following on from the success of the inaugural event in 2015 at The Plaza Hotel, New York, the team at Three6Zero are once again bringing the entire industry together in Las Vegas. This event is eagerly awaited by those who attended in 2015 as it promotes and highlights the achievements from the North American automotive supply chain sector through best performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 573 Safety Recall Report 20V-575
    OMB Control No.: 2127-0004 Part 573 Safety Recall Report 20V-575 Manufacturer Name : Ford Motor Company Submission Date : SEP 23, 2020 NHTSA Recall No. : 20V-575 Manufacturer Recall No. : 20C19 Manufacturer Information : Population : Manufacturer Name : Ford Motor Company Number of potentially involved : 620,246 Address : 330 Town Center Drive Estimated percentage with defect : 47 % Suite 500 Dearborn MI 48126-2738 Company phone : 1-866-436-7332 Vehicle Information : Vehicle 1 : 2020-2020 Ford F150 Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : ALL Power Train : NR Descriptive Information : The recalled part was introduced into production on 10/26/2019 at the Dearborn Assembly Plant, and was introduced into production on 11/02/2019 at the Kansas City Truck Plant. The recalled part was taken out of production on 05/18/2020. These vehicles are not produced in VIN order. Information as to the applicability of this action to specific vehicles can best be obtained by either calling Ford’s toll-free line (1-866-436-7332) or by contacting a local Ford or Lincoln dealer who can obtain specific information regarding the vehicles from the Ford On-line Automotive Service Information System (OASIS) database. 220,098 F150 vehicles are affected Production Dates : OCT 26, 2019 - MAY 18, 2020 VIN Range 1 : Begin : NR End : NR Not sequential The information contained in this report was submitted pursuant to 49 CFR §573 Part 573 Safety Recall Report 20V-575 Page 2 Vehicle 2 : 2020-2020 Ford Explorer Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : ALL Power Train : NR Descriptive Information : The recalled part was introduced into production on 11/16/2019 and was taken out of production on 05/18/2020 at the Chicago Assembly Plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Combination of Brexit and Ceta - Moving Vehicle Platforms from 1
    COMBINATION OF BREXIT AND CETA - MOVING VEHICLE PLATFORMS FROM 1 UK TO CANADA Combination of Brexit and CETA - Study on the Possibility of Motor Corporations Moving Vehicle Platforms from UK to Canada Junxi YU Engineering and Public Policy, McMaster University COMBINATION OF BREXIT AND CETA - MOVING VEHICLE PLATFORMS FROM 2 UK TO CANADA Abstract With the help from Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) signed in 2016, enormous opportunities and benefits have been created for the automotive industry in Canada. Specifically, European Union(EU) tariffs immediately eliminated on all Canadian auto parts that exported to EU. In the European market, UK has been a competitor to Canada in the automotive industry. After Brexit, without the benefits of free trade within EU, vehicles manufactured in the UK will start to lose their appeal in price gradually. In the thesis, a comparison on the current situation of five motor corporations in Canada and the corresponding motor corporations in the UK was made. It was found that only Honda Canada and Honda UK have an identical vehicle platform referred as Honda Civic platform, which produces same vehicle models, namely Honda Civic Type R and Honda CRV. On the contrast, the other four auto corporations don’t possess a same vehicle platform, producing same vehicle models in Canada and UK. A thorough analysis on Honda Motor Company was conducted. The total costs including vehicle price, shipping costs, tariff and currency exchange rate for EU consumers to purchase a car from the same platform in Canada and UK was calculated separately. By comparing the total costs of the two purchasing routes, the conclusion and recommendations was provided.
    [Show full text]
  • General Motors WE CARE Case Study Air Filter Refurbishment Program
    General Motors WE CARE Case Study Air Filter Refurbishment Program Moves Forward GM Vehicle Operations, Flint Truck Assembly, Flint, Michigan: Recipient of a 2002 WE CARE Award for Materials Conservation/Pollution Prevention Description of the Facility: The General Motors (GM) Flint Truck Assembly plant is located in Flint, Michigan. The 3.2 million square foot facility is situated on 159 acres and employs over 3,100 people. Flint Truck produces the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra Crew Cab and the new 560 Medium duty truck. Description of the Opportunity: Air filtration systems that utilize cylindrical air filters are used extensively throughout GM Assembly, Metal Fabricating, and Powertrain Operations. These air filtration systems filter particulate matter from the air that is generated from plant production activities, such as welding. Therefore, these systems help keep plant indoor air clean. The system uses filters, which are changed on a regular basis when dirty as indicated by pressure differential. The filters are typically two feet in height, 15 to 20-inches in diameter, and weigh 12 to 15 pounds new. They consist of a mesh metal cylinder, metal end caps, neoprene seals, and a polyester-blend pleated media. In the past, used filters were placed in a 20 or 32-yard waste gondola. When the gondola was full, it was removed and the filters were placed in a landfill. Description of the Improvement: Flint Truck Assembly was the first GM plant to utilize a new development in air filter reuse and recycling. The process involves a GM supplier who built a mobile recycling unit, based on GM recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Chevy Express 2500
    2002 chevy express 2500 The Chevrolet Camaro is a mid-size [1] [2] American automobile manufactured by Chevrolet , classified as a pony car [3] [4] and some versions also as a muscle car. The Camaro shared its platform and major components with the Pontiac Firebird , also introduced for Four distinct generations of the Camaro were developed before production ended in The nameplate was revived on a concept car that evolved into the fifth-generation Camaro ; production started on March 16, Before any official announcement, reports began running during April within the automotive press that Chevrolet was preparing a competitor to the Ford Mustang , code-named Panther. Hope you can be on hand to help scratch a cat. Details will follow It was the first time that 14 cities were connected in real-time for a press conference via telephone lines. Estes then announced a new car line, project designation XP , with a name that Chevrolet chose in keeping with other car names beginning with the letter C such as the Corvair , Chevelle , Chevy II , and Corvette. He claimed the name, suggests the comradeship of good friends as a personal car should be to its owner and that to us, the name means just what we think the car will do The Camaro name was then unveiled. Payen-Payne printed in Lund and Mr. Rollett found the word camaro in the French-English dictionary was slang , to mean friend, pal, or comrade. The article further repeated Estes's statement of what the word camaro was meant to imply, that the car's name "suggests the comradeship of good friends, as a personal car should be to its owner".
    [Show full text]