Part 573 Safety Recall Report 20V-575
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Final Progress Report
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: Chrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation and the American Automobile Manufacturers Association (AAMA) thank the Advisory Group members for their advice and support during the US Auto Project. The Auto Companies and AAMA also acknowledge the guidance and counsel provided by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), US EPA Region V, and the Council of Great Lakes Governors (CGLG). PRINTING SPECIFICATIONS: Cover: 80 lb. 100 percent recycled, 100 percent post-consumer, non-coated, chlorine free Paper: 24 lb. 100 percent recycled, 100 percent post-consumer, non-coated, chlorine free Ink: Soy-based Reproduced by Michigan Great Printers Project participant CONTACTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: For hard copies of the US Automotive Pollution Prevention Project Final Progress Report, contact Chrysler, Ford, or General Motors at the addresses listed below or the Environmental Assistance Division of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality at 1-800-662-9278. Chrysler Ford Debby Rowe, CIMS 482-00-51 Sue Rokosz Chrysler Corporation Ford Motor Company 800 Chrysler Drive Parklane Towers East, Suite 1400 Auburn Hills, MI 48326-2757 One Parklane Blvd. [email protected] Dearborn, MI 48126 [email protected] General Motors MDEQ Sandra Brewer, 482-303-300 Marcia Horan General Motors Corporation Environmental Assistance Division 465 W. Milwaukee Ave. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Detroit, MI 48202 P.O. Box 30457 [email protected] Lansing, MI 48909 [email protected] INTERNET ACCESS: The US Auto Project Final Progress Report and pollution prevention industry case studies can be accessed at the MDEQ internet web site: http://www.deq.state.mi.us/ead/p2sect/auto/ US Auto Project Final Progress Report - November 1998 Page i Final Progress Report US Automotive Pollution Prevention Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary iv I. -
Michigan Auto Project Progress Report - December 2000 I Inaugural Progress Report Michigan Automotive Pollution Prevention Project
A VOLUNTARY POLLUTION PREVENTION AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP ADMINISTERED BY: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Assistance Division DECEMBER, 2000: 1st ISSUE John Engler, Governor • Russell J. Harding, Director www.deq.state.mi.us ACKNOWLEDGMENTS DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation and the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) thank the Auto Project Stakeholder Group members for providing advice to the Auto Project partners and facilitating public information exchange. The Auto Companies and MDEQ also acknowledge the guidance and counsel provided by the US EPA Region V. CONTACTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION For information regarding the Michigan Automotive Pollution Prevention Project Progress Report, contact DaimlerChrysler, Ford, or General Motors at the addresses listed below or the Environmental Assistance Division of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality at 1-800-662-9278. DaimlerChrysler Ford Doug Orf, CIMS 482-00-51 Sue Rokosz DaimlerChrysler Corporation Ford Motor Company 800 Chrysler Drive One Parklane Blvd., Suite 1400 Auburn Hills, MI 48326-2757 Dearborn, MI 48126 [email protected] [email protected] General Motors MDEQ Sandra Brewer, 482-303-300 Anita Singh Welch General Motors Corporation Environmental Assistance Division 465 W. Milwaukee Ave. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Detroit, MI 48202 P.O. Box 30457 [email protected] Lansing, MI 48909 [email protected] Michigan Auto Project Progress Report - December 2000 i Inaugural Progress Report Michigan Automotive Pollution Prevention Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Foreward iv I. Executive Summary Project Overview 1 Activities and Accomplishments 4 Focus on Michigan 11 Auto Company Profiles II. DaimlerChrysler Corporation Project Status 12 Activities and Accomplishments 14 Focus on Michigan 16 III. -
Progress Report for the Great Lakes Automotive Pollution Prevention Project September 1995
1, CHRYSLER VAf CORPORATION A VOLUNTARY PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT General MO tors TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT! Printed on Recycled Paper @ FOREWORD The Great Lakes Automotive Pollution Prevention Project (Auto Project) is a partnership between government and the automotive industry to promote pollution prevention. The Auto Project originated from the Council of Great Lakes Governor's Pollution Prevention Challenge. On September 24, 1991, Chrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company and General Motors Corporation, with their trade association, the American Automobile Manufacturers Association (AAMA) agreed with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) to a voluntary pollution prevention action plan to reduce the generation and release of persistent toxic substances that adversely affect water quality in the Great Lakes. This is the second progress report on the status and accomplishments of the Auto Project, the first was published in February 1994. The first report received wide distribution, which created the need to produce periodic updates on the Auto Project's achievements and its futurp direction. This report provides an overview of some of the key accomplishments of the Auto Project with an emphasis on the activities that have been implemented between October 1993 and July 1995. It also includes data on the release of the Great Lakes Persistent Toxics substances identified by the Project. The Auto Project demonstrates the benefits of a voluntary partnership between industry and government. The parties within -
The Magazine for UAW Members and Their Families Build/Buyusa Keep Communities Strong Through Consumer Action
September - October 2017 The magazine for UAW members and their families Build/BuyUSA Keep Communities Strong Through Consumer Action The “Buy American” movement drive the legislation and regulations Buy it Here isn’t new, but it looks different of that country. In the U.S., we have Taking action is about more than from how it did in the 1970s. Back it backward: our “industrial policy” just political engagement; we can then there were almost 20 million reveals itself after tax subsidies have do so many things in our daily lives. workers making goods in factories been awarded and the decisions Shopping is one example. We look across the country. These workers are already made regarding trade, at products for good value, but made the clothes we wore, the the environment, job training, measuring that value is more than goods we bought for our homes, investment in infrastructure and just looking at the sticker price. As the televisions we watched, and education. We give companies consumers, make your voice heard by the toys our children enjoyed. We economic subsidies to build factories encouraging and commending stores shopped for and purchased these that pay our workers less than what for carrying union/USA products. goods at stores in our communities taxpayers are giving the companies Each purchase is a choice. Use the — maybe even down the block in our to locate here. power of your wallet to support neighborhood. Now, there are only Our country’s agenda should lift good-paying jobs. When you shop, 12.3 million workers making goods in everyone, not make it easier to consider these categories of goods: factories. -
Ford and Lincoln Mercury Dealers SUBJECT: Safety
A.R. O'Neill Ford Motor Company Director P. O. Box 1904 Vehicle Service and Programs Dearborn, Michigan 48121 Ford Customer Service Division August 2001 TO: All Ford and Lincoln Mercury Dealers SUBJECT: Safety Recall 01S24: Certain 2000 and 2001 Model Year Cars and Trucks -- Wiper Motor Gear Cover Replacement AFFECTED VEHICLES Certain 2000 and 2001 model year: · Focus vehicles built at: -- Wayne Assembly Plant from February 25, 2000 through August 15, 2000 -- Hermosillo Assembly Plant from February 28, 2000 through July 25, 2000 · Taurus/Sable vehicles built at: -- Atlanta Assembly Plant from February 11, 2000 through July 31, 2000 -- Chicago Assembly Plant from February 14, 2000 through August 4, 2000 · F-150 vehicles built at: -- Ontario Truck Plant from February 17, 2000 through August 3, 2000 -- Norfolk Assembly Plant from February 21, 2000 through July 27, 2000 -- Kansas City Assembly Plant from February 26, 2000 through September 4, 2000 -- Cuautitlan Assembly Plant from March 3, 2000 through August 7, 2000 · F-250/350/450/550 vehicles built at: -- Cuautitlan Assembly Plant from February 25, 2000 through August 2, 2000 -- Kentucky Truck Assembly Plant from February 18, 2000 through August 31, 2000 · Expedition and Navigator built at: -- Michigan Truck Plant from February 23, 2000 through August 3, 2000 · F-650/F750 Series vehicles built at: -- Cuautitlan Assembly Plant from February 25, 2000 through August 2, 2000 · Continental vehicles built at the Wixom Assembly Plant from March 9, 2000 through August 8, 2000 · Town Car vehicles -
Docketed 12-Alt-2 Tn # 67271
California Energy Commission DOCKETED 12-ALT-2 TN # 67271 SEP 24 2012 9/24/2012 California Energy Commission Dockets Office, MS-4 1516 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA 95814-5512 RE: Docket Number 12-ALT-02 ARRO Autogas is a California company dedicated to the sales and distribution of propane as a transportation fuel throughout the western states. We are developing a network of publicly accessible, 24 hour/7 day per week Autogas refueling sites at gasoline stations as well as other convenient locations initially in southern California. Our customers include early adopters of propane Autogas including ThyssenKrupp, Direct TV, Prime Time Shuttle, Roadrunner Shuttle and others noted in the press. More information on ARRO Autogas is available through our website: www.arroautogas.com. We greatly appreciate this opportunity to comment on the 2013-14 Investment Plan Update. Although ARRO would certainly welcome funding support for rolling out additional locations, we believe it to be more important that demand for propane Autogas be enhanced. We can build stations if we know we have customers that need them. If one cannot lower the impediments to placing Autogas powered vehicles into California, building additional refueling sites is of little merit. The 2012‐2013 Investment Plan Update For The Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program from Assembly Bill 32 (Núñez, Chapter 488, Statutes of 2006), has established a goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, and Executive Order S‐3‐05 has established a goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.