DOCSLIB.ORG

IN the SUPREME COURT STATE of NORTH DAKOTA Maureen Ann

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IN the SUPREME COURT STATE of NORTH DAKOTA Maureen Ann 20090316 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE IN THE SUPREME COURT CLERK OF SUPREME COURT MARCH 8, 2010 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA Maureen Ann Woodward, : Plaintiff and Appellant : -v- : Supreme Court No.20090316 George Woodward, : District Court Nos. 05-C-03471 Defendant and Appellee : APPELLANT’S BRIEF APPEAL OF THIRD AMENDED JUDGMENT CHANGING CUSTODY OF EB DISTRICT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, THE HONORABLE FRANK L. RACEK, PRESIDING. William Steven Kirschner Attorney for Maureen Woodward Kirschner Law Office Suite 104, 1351 Page Drive Fargo, North Dakota 58103-3635 (701) 293-5297 ND Bar ID # 03713 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES [p.3] ISSUES PRESENTED [p.4] STATEMENT OF THE CASE [1] FACTS [17] ARGUMENT 1 The District Court erred in failing to recuse itself from this case. [32] 2 The District Court’s decision to change the custody of E was clearly erroneous[84] 3 The District Court’s decision regarding visitation between EW and her mother and siblings did not reflect consideration of the necessary factors [112] CONCLUSION [115] 2 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES North Dakota Cases Dronen v. Dronen, 2009 ND 70, 764 N.W. 2d 675 [29] Linrud v. Linrud, 552 N.W. 2d 342 (N.D. 1996) [75] Sargent County Bank v. Wentworth, 500 N.W. 2d, 862, (N.D. 1993) [73] Woodward v. Woodward, 2009 ND 214,776 N.W.2d 567 [4] 3 ISSUES PRESENTED 1. Whether the District Court committed reversible error when it refused to recuse itself in this case? 2. Whether the District Court’s decision to change the custody of EW was supported by a substantial change in circumstances and whether it was in the best interests of EW? 3. Whether the District Court’s decision regarding the new visitation between Maureen and EW reflected consideration of the best interests of EW, and the connections between her and her siblings and her mother? 4 STATEMENT OF THE CASE [1] This is the appeal of the most recent Judgment entered in this case on August 25, 2009 after entry of the Court’s order on August 20, 2009 granting the Defendant’s Motion for Change of Custody. The motion was made on March 12, 2009. Subsequent to the Motion for Change of Custody, the Plaintiff moved to recuse the Court and the Court issued an Order on April 29, 2009 denying the Motion. [2] A Hearing on part of the Defendant’s Motion, which asked for a Contempt citation against the Plaintiff for denying further visitation, was held on May 7, and May 21, 2009. On June 3, 2009, the Court entered an Order modifying the previous visitation order with regard to EW’s older sister RW. The Court modified the prior Order so that RW would not be forced against her will to visit with her father. On June 16, 2009, the Court entered an Order finding that the Defendant had made a prima facie showing regarding his motion to modify the custody of the minor children and scheduled an evidentiary hearing to begin July 23, 2009. [3] An evidentiary hearing was held on July 23, 2009. Final arguments and briefs were submitted by the parties and the Court entered its Order on August 20, 2009 ordering the change of custody of EW from Maureen to George Woodward, and providing that Maureen would now enjoy the visitation which George had previously received. The Third Amended Judgment was prepared by George’s attorney and Maureen appeals from that Judgment. [4] This case is a continuation of the dispute which first arose in Woodward v. Woodward, 2009 ND 214, 776 N.W.2d 567, a consolidated appeal, which was decided by this Court on December 18, 2009. [5] In that case, this Court affirmed the previous orders of the District Court denying Maureen’s motion to modify and limit George’s visitation and granted George compensatory 5 visitation, and ordered Maureen to undergo a parental alienation and psychological evaluation. The Order held Maureen in contempt for failing to comply with the visitation provisions of the previous judgment. In this case, the District Court decided to change the custody of EW to her father. [6] The parties were divorced in May, 2006, after having separated approximately one year before that. At the time of the divorce, the Court granted custody of the 3 children, who were then 16, 13, almost 6 to Maureen. George had alternating weekend visitation, as well as weekday, holiday and summer visitation with the children. GW, who is chronologically sixteen years of age, is autistic and functions at a much lower level than his siblings. Since before the divorce, and thereafter, the children have been home schooled by their mother. (Tr. V.1, pp. 9-11) [7] George married Jennifer Halvorson in 2007. After the marriage the children began to have problems when visiting with their father. They requested that their mother help them to change their step-mother or protect them from her. [8] Finally, in the summer of 2008, after failing to have any effect on George and Jennifer’s conduct, Maureen relented and agreed to not force the girls to visit their father and stepmother in Grand Forks. In August 2008, Maureen sought a Modification of the Visitation Provisions to provide that the children not be forced to see George’s new wife, Jennifer, and that visitation not be in her presence. George filed a cross motion for Contempt, and for modification of the original judgment to provide for additional visitation. He also requested a “parental alienation evaluation”, as well as a psychological evaluation, and an order for his attorney’s fees and costs in bringing the motion. [9] The hearing on these motions took place on September 19, October 6, and October 16, 2008. Thereafter the Referee issued her Findings and Order finding Maureen in Contempt, and 6 ordering the resumption of visitation, as well as compensatory visitation with the children. The Referee also ordered Maureen to undergo a parental alienation and psychological evaluation at Solutions in Moorhead at her expense. This decision was affirmed by the District Court and then this Court in December 2009. [10] Prior to the District Court’s affirmation of the Referee’s Findings and Order, Maureen sought a stay from the District Court based upon the opinion of a psychiatrist, Dr. Harjinder Virdee, that the children’s visits with their step mother were doing them more harm than good, and that such visits were likely to lead to further deterioration in their mental health. (Cross Motion to Suspend Visitation, Docket No. 182), (Deposition testimony of Harjinder Virdee, Docket No. 196). [11] On February 2, 2009, Judge Racek heard this Motion and entered an Order finding Maureen in Contempt again. He ordered counseling to begin with RW with Dr. Ambers, a counselor selected by George in Grand Forks on February 6, 2009. This matter was appealed and joined with the first appeal and affirmed as previously noted. [12] Subsequent to the February 2nd hearing, EW and GW began visiting with their father on a regular basis. RW continued to refuse to visit her father in Grand Forks. On a subsequent motion for contempt filed by George, Judge Racek ordered RW to have counseling with her father with a counselor recommended by Dr. Kevin Schumacher. Based on Dr. Schumacher’s testimony, he ordered that RW not be forced to visit with her father against her will (Docket No. 240). [13] The counseling continued for several sessions, but stopped because George was unwilling to continue. [14] The Court held hearing on George’s second Motion for Contempt on May 7, 2009 and 7 May 21, 2009. A hearing on his motion for change of custody was held on July 23, 2009. [15] At the beginning of the Change of Custody hearing, the parties stipulated that the Court could take Judicial Notice of all the prior affidavits and testimony presented in this case. The parties had deposed Dr. Laidlaw and his deposition was submitted subsequent to the hearing. [16] At the hearing on July 23, 2010, the only witness to testify was George Woodward. FACTS [17] George and Maureen Woodward were married in Chicago, Illinois on December 14, 1986. George was a resident. and Maureen was a student. The Woodward’s lived in various locations and moved to Fargo in 2001, when George joined the practice at Dakota Innovis Hospital as a neurologist. [18] During their marriage the parties had three children. The first child is GW, who was born in 1990. GW suffers from autism and has the mental age of a 7 year old. The second child is RW, who was born in 1993 and was 13 at the time of the original divorce, and is 16½ now. The third child is EW, who was born in 2000, and was almost 6 at the time of the divorce, and is now 10 years old. [19] The parties separated in July, 2005 and were finally divorced in May, 2006. At the time of the divorce, Maureen was a homemaker. Because of the necessity of providing full time care for GW, she has been home schooling all the children. Maureen was granted custody of all three children. George was given extensive visitation and exercised that visitation without any interruption until the summer of 2008. [20] In February, 2006 George began dating his current wife, Jennifer, and they were married in April, 2007. The children did not attend the wedding in Las Vegas, Nevada. 8 [21] Beginning shortly after visitation started between the children and their new step mother, the children began having problems with their step mother, and appealed to both their father and mother to assist them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report of Activities 2020 TABLE of CONTENTS
    Report of Activities 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 1 CLEAN WATER . 3 ENHANCED BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Ahead of the Storm Implementation Projects on Champlain Valley School District Campuses . 5 Chazy River Watershed Management Plan . 6 Coordinating Homesite Stormwater Assessments Basin-Wide to Advance Voluntary Implementation . 7 Foster Brook Culvert Replacement . 8 Georgia Shore Stormwater and Shoreline Erosion Assessment . 9 I-87 Asphalt Swale Replacement & Ditch Improvements . 10 Johnsons Mill Dam Removal in Bakersfield, VT . 11 Kennedy Drive Pond 5/6 Retrofit . 12 Lake Forest Condominiums Stormwater System Upgrade and Stream Daylight . 13 Lamoille Union High School Green Stormwater Infrastructure Retrofit . 14 Otis Brook Stream Crossing Replacement, Jay Mountain Rd, Ausable River Watershed . 15 Planning/Prioritization for Ahead of the Storm Projects at Shelburne Museum . 16 Reducing Combined Sewer Overflows to Lake Champlain through Public Private Partnerships and Innovative Technology. 17 Salt Runoff Reduction Project . 18 Stormwater Improvements at the Milton DPW Highway Garage in the Lamoille River Watershed, Milton, VT . 19 Stormwater Mitigation Final Designs: Berlin, Vermont . 20 Stormwater Reduction in the Town of Brandon . 21 The Prioritization and Design of Transportation Stormwater Mitigation Projects in Northwestern Vermont . 22 Transforming Hyde Park Village Center into a Net Zero Runoff Showcase Using Green Stormwater Infrastructure . 23 UVM Horticultural Farm Stormwater Improvements . 24 INNOVATIVE AGRICULTURE Tile Drain Base Flow Phosphorus Removal Using St. George Black . 25 Tile Drainage System Monitoring and Assessment in the Northern and Southern Lake Champlain Basin, and Comparing Two Active Media Filters to Remove Phosphorus from Tile Drainage Water in the St. Albans Bay Watershed, VT . 26 POLLUTION PREVENTION AND HABITAT CONSERVATION Advancing a Riparian Restoration Protocol for the Ausable Watershed .
    [Show full text]
  • Communicating Heterosexism in Queer Pregnancies: a Multiadic Interview Study
    Communicating Heterosexism in Queer Pregnancies: A Multiadic Interview Study A dissertation presented to the faculty of the Scripps College of Communication of Ohio University In partial fulfillment Of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Nicole C. Hudak August 2019 © 2019 Nicole C. Hudak. All Rights Reserved This dissertation titled Communicating Heterosexism in Queer Pregnancies: A Multiadic Interview Study by NICOLE C. HUDAK has been approved for the School of Communication Studies and the Scripps College of Communication by Benjamin R. Bates Professor of Communication Studies Scott Titsworth Dean, Scripps College of Communication ii Abstract HUDAK, NICOLE C., Ph.D., August 2019, School of Communication Studies Communicating Heterosexism in Queer Pregnancies: A Multiadic Interview Study Director of Dissertation: Benjamin R. Bates Heterosexism is a power system in society that promotes the belief that every person is and should be heterosexual (Pharr, 1997). In knowing that heterosexism permeates everyday discourse, this dissertation examines how queer experiences are understood through the lens of heterosexism. Specifically, this dissertation focuses on the queer pregnancy experience, as lesbian motherhood is heavily scrutinized (Hequembourg, 2007). As part of the pregnancy experience, queer women enter healthcare spaces. Both healthcare and medical education promote heterosexism in their education (Zuzelo, 2014; Murphy, 2016) and in practice (Hudak, 2016; Saulnier, 2002). To explore how heterosexism is communicated and resisted in queer pregnancy, I conducted a multiadic interview (Manning, 2015) study with sixteen queer couples who had recently experienced a pregnancy. Through critically analyzing the interviews, two main findings emerged surrounding heterosexism being communicated in healthcare and heterosexism being communicated in public and private relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Transgender and Gender Nonconforming People
    Case 9:18-cv-80771-RLR Document 126-30 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/24/2018 Page 1 of 33 Guidelines for Psychological Practice With Transgender and Gender Nonconforming People American Psychological Association Transgender and gender nonconforming1 (TGNC) people logical practice guidelines be developed to help psycholo- are those who have a gender identity that is not fully gists maximize the effectiveness of services offered and aligned with their sex assigned at birth. The existence of avoid harm when working with TGNC people and their TGNC people has been documented in a range of historical families. cultures (Coleman, Colgan, & Gooren, 1992; Feinberg, Purpose 1996; Miller & Nichols, 2012; Schmidt, 2003). Current population estimates of TGNC people have ranged from The purpose of the Guidelines for Psychological Practice 0.17 to 1,333 per 100,000 (Meier & Labuski, 2013). The with Transgender and Gender Nonconforming People Massachusetts Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (hereafter Guidelines) is to assist psychologists in the pro- found 0.5% of the adult population aged 18 to 64 years vision of culturally competent, developmentally appropri- identified as TGNC between 2009 and 2011 (Conron, ate, and trans-affirmative psychological practice with Scott, Stowell, & Landers, 2012). However, population TGNC people. Trans-affirmative practice is the provision estimates likely underreport the true number of TGNC people, given difficulties in collecting comprehensive de- mographic information about this group (Meier & Labuski, The American Psychological Association’s (APA’s) Task Force on Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Transgender and Gender Non- 2013). Within the last two decades, there has been a sig- conforming People developed these guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Starting the Adoption Journey: My Two Cents
    Starting the adoption journey: my two cents Every June Catholic Charities holds a picnic at Kinder Farm Park for its adoptive families. This year it was part-play date, part-reunion, as the boys slid, climbed, and explored one of the best playgrounds we’ve visited. In between catching Daniel at the bottom of the slides and pushing Leo on the “rocket ship swing,” John and I had a chance to reconnect with some of the couples we waited with a few years ago, see our social worker friends, and encounter some new families. One couple we met Sunday is waiting to travel to meet their first child, a 3-year-old boy, in China, so they had lots of hopeful excitement—and questions. We talked about attachment, airplane entertainment, and the parenting challenges and joys that we have experienced—recognizing that theirs may be completely different. As one of the Catholic Charities social workers is fond of saying, “Your mileage may vary.” Toward the end of the afternoon, after Leo got to pet a baby calf named Alice and Daniel saw his first rabbits up close, we were cleaning off our picnic table. It had been a practically perfect day—sunny, but with a gentle breeze—and I had just dramatically spilled cranberry juice on what had been my white Capri pants. The boys—who skipped their naps that day—were starting to fade, and we were getting ready to go. As I was gathering trash from the table, a woman approached me and introduced herself. She didn’t want to keep me long.
    [Show full text]
  • Pittsburgh Colfax K-8 Handbook
    MESSAGE FROM OUR PRINCIPAL I would like to welcome you to Pittsburgh Colfax K-8. We are committed to providing an opportunity for all children to learn within a safe, caring atmosphere designed to nurture the spirit and stimulate the intellect. With our total commitment to children, we feel we are succeeding in our mission to provide an enriching educational experience preparing our students to achieve academic excellence and strength of character; thereby creating a foundation in which all students succeed in all aspects of life. I look forward to working with you to help ensure the success of your child/children during the school year. Warm Regards, PITTSBURGH Dr. Tamara Sanders-Woods, Colfax K-8 Principal MESSAGE FROM THE PTO COLFAX K-8 As members of the Colfax community—families, teachers, and staff—we will work together to make this school year our best one yet. colfaxpto.org HANDBOOK REVISION HISTORY Date Version Description Author(s) August 1.0 Initial release Abbie Campsie, Chuck Cranor, 2014 Shannon Ewing, Jenny Ganger, Anne Kurzweg, Jessica Neiss, Jessie Ramey, Marcie Ritter, Sara Segel, Adam Sikorski, Jamie Kinzel-Nath, Cara McKenna, Sarah Sirlin, Sukanya Srinivasan August 2.0 Updated for 2019-2020 School Year. Mitch Franzos, Sarah Grubb, Ross 2019 Ingram, Jeanine Weiss August 3.0 Updated for 2020-2021 School Year. Primarily focused on Ross Ingram 2020 updating tables of “special activities” and “communication and contact information”; also “additional references” 3.1 Updated Activities and Officers; Minor edits to PSCC Ross Ingram, Karey Kluesner description. 2 Table of Contents 2020-21 - EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Raising Children with Roots, Rights & Responsibilities
    Raising Children With Roots, Rights & Responsibilities: Celebrating the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child Written by Lori DuPont, Joanne Foley, and Annette Gagliardi Founders of the Circle for the Child Project Edited and designed by Julie Penshorn, Co-Director, Growing Communities for Peace Published by University of Minnesota Human Rights Resource Center and the Stanley Foundation Copyright © 1999 Human Rights Resource Center, University of Minnesota The Human Rights Education Series is published by the Human Rights Resource Center at the University of Minnesota and the Stanley Foundation. The series provides resources for the ever-growing body of educators and activists working to build a culture of human rights in the United States and throughout the world. Raising Children with Roots, Rights, & Responsibilities: Celebrating the Convention on the Rights of the Child may be reproduced without permission for educational use only. No reproductions may be sold for profit. Excerpted or adapted material from this publication must include full citation of the source. To reproduce for any other purposes, a written request must be submitted to the Human Rights Resource Center. The Human Rights Education Series is edited by Nancy Flowers. Edited and designed by Julie Penshorn, Co-Director of Growing Communities for Peace. Illustrations by eleven-year-old Margaret Anne Gagliardi. Cover design donated by Nancy Hope. ISBN 0-9675334-1-3 To order further copies of Raising Children With Roots, Rights, & Responsibilities: Celebrating the Conven- tion on the Rights of the Child, contact: Human Rights Resource Center University of Minnesota 229 - 19th Avenue South, Room 439 Minneapolis, MN 55455 Tel: 1-888-HREDUC8 Fax: 612-625-2011 email: [email protected] http://www.hrusa.org and http://www.umn.edu/humanrts A contribution to the United Nations Decade for Human Rights Education, 1995-2004 Dedication This book is lovingly dedicated to our children: Jesse, Jacob, Rachel, Erica, Marian, Maggie, and Maria and to the children of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Law Guardian Ad Litem Investigations
    WASHINGTON STATE Title 26 Family Law Guardian Ad Litem Guidebook Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts 1112 Quince Street SE PO Box 41170 Olympia, WA 98504-1170 Page i COPYRIGHT© 2008 © 2008 by the Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts. These materials have been prepared for the training of Washington State Family Law Guardians ad Litem, and neither the editors or authors make either express or implied warranties in regard to these materials. Each user must depend upon his or her own knowledge and legal expertise or that of an attorney in the use or modification of these materials. The reader may download or print these materials for personal use. However, no person or entity shall copy or distribute this Guidebook, or any portion of it, for profit except by permission the Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts 1112 Quince Street SE PO Box 41170 Olympia, WA 98504-1170 Page ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In 1996, the Washington State Legislature required the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) to develop a curriculum for prospective guardians ad litem in family law cases under Title 26 RCW. The requirement was mandatory as of January 1, 1998. In 2005, stakeholders in the GAL programs called for a revision in the curriculum. AOC convened a Title 26 Revision Committee to review and revise the original curriculum. The need for a statewide guidebook was identified during that process. The 2006 – 2007 Title 26 Curriculum Revision Committee, chaired by Pierce County Superior Court Judge Kitty-Ann van Doorninck, consisted of Jorge Chacon, Guardian ad Litem in Wenatchee; Marilyn Finsen, Assistant Administrator, Snohomish County Superior Court; Margaret E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nanny Work Agreement
    Ten Tips: Writing the Nanny Work Agreement 1. Remember WHY you are doing this Your nanny is your employee. She will have sole charge of your children in an unsupervised setting. Your family will depend on the nanny for her professional services, and the nanny contract or work agreement sets the professional tone of the relationship right from the beginning and truly will avert future problems and misunderstandings. 2. Cover all the basics What are the basics? Absolutely cover all hours and duties. Compensation for the base hours should be stated in hourly wage terms, with a specified weekly guarantee (this will become the rate for vacation time, sick time, etc.). Use the Hourly Pay Rate Calculator to translate a weekly salary into the appropriate hourly and overtime rates. Cover all benefits including paid holidays, employer contribution to medical insurance if offered, and sick/holiday/paid time off. 3. Details Count! You and your nanny will refer to this document whenever issues arise in the relationship. The time you take to spell out the details will generally avert misunderstanding due to different assumptions. Consider "child's bedding will be changed and laundered weekly" instead of "laundering of child's bedding." What about additional hours - either planned or unexpected? Nanny tardiness? You agreement should address this with both overtime compensation and payroll consequences for tardiness. Detail expense reimbursement, including any family parameters for discretionary spending by the nanny. 4. State payroll frequency and tax treatment How frequently will the nanny be paid? What day of the week is payday? What taxes are you deducting? Are you deducting the nanny's income taxes or is she responsible for paying those directly? All of these items should be spelled out up front.
    [Show full text]
  • Based School and Home-Education? Glossary of Homeschooling Terms by Judy Arnall
    What is the difference between Home- based School and Home-education? Glossary of Homeschooling Terms By Judy Arnall Joining a group of homeschooling parents for a play date with kids and parental conversation can leave a new or prospective homeschooler perplexed with the jargon used. Here is a quick guide of definitions so you will know what they are talking about! After-schooling When the regular school program is supplemented by tutoring from outside sources or parents. Aligned Program A school planned, delivered and marked program that is delivered in the home but is totally responsible to Alberta Education by the school. Because the school is totally responsible for the home-based program, it must follow the mandated Alberta Program of Studies outcomes and approved curriculum materials. The government doesn't use the term "Aligned" but uses "distance learning" or "virtual school" or "home-based learning" for school that is school-controlled but done in the home. This is not home education. This is school, even though it is your living room. You are not expected to do anymore than a parent with a child in a building school. APS - Alberta Program of Studies (Outcomes) A detailed list of goals and outcomes that the student is expected to prove mastery of, and is sorted by grade and subjects for grades Kindergarten to grade 12. This is the "bible" of outcomes for all students in all schools across Alberta, regardless of being private, public, French Immersion, charter, online, correspondence or home-based. The only exception is for traditional homeschoolers who can teach whatever they wish.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Park Slope Parents Nanny Compensation Survey
    The Park Slope Parents Nanny Compensation Survey 2011 Copyright 2011 by Park Slope Parents.Any duplication, reproduction, or usage of this document or any portion thereof withoutwritten consent is prohibited. Nanny Compensation Survey 2011 0 Table of Contents • Methodology and Background • Summary of Findings • Detailed Findings . Pay Rates, Time Off, Raises and Bonuses . Holidays, Time Off and Sick Days . Responsibilities and Policies . Work Agreement . Paying On/Off the Books . Finding and Hiring a Nanny . Respondent Demographics and Nanny Tenure • Nanny Compensation Survey 2011 1 Table of Contents (cont.) • Findings from past PSP Nanny Surveys • Disclaimer • About Park Slope Parents Nanny Compensation Survey 2011 2 Methodology • Park Slope Parents conducted its THIRD Nanny Compensation Survey in May and June, 2011. • Over 1,000 parents from Brooklyn (only) participated in the survey. • 72% of participants were members of Park Slope Parents and other online groups as well as other parents who had been forwarded the survey. • 44% of respondents live in Park Slope, along with other Brooklyn neighborhoods represented. NOTE: These data represent the behavior and attitudes of employers of Nannies. We fully acknowledge that to have a fuller picture of Nanny compensation we would need to also survey Nannies‟ perceptions and behavior. This was beyond the scope and capabilities of the current research. We also understand that both parents and caregivers will have access to the data. Nanny Compensation Survey 2011 3 Background: Information on
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Prevention Resource Guide: Making Meaningful Connections Is the Product of a Collaboration Among the U.S
    Making Meaningful 2014 Prevention Connections Resource Guide Dear Colleagues: The 2014 Prevention Resource Guide: Making Meaningful Connections is the product of a collaboration among the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Children’s Bureau, Office on Child Abuse and Neglect, its Child Welfare Information Gateway, the FRIENDS National Resource Center for Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention, and the Center for the Study of Social Policy— Strengthening Families. This year’s Resource Guide reflects the theme of the Office on Child Abuse and Neglect’s 19th National Conference on Child Abuse and Neglect—Making Meaningful Connections. 2014 marks the 40th anniversary of the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA, P.L. 93-247), which centralized and expanded Federal efforts to prevent and respond to child abuse and neglect. The problems that children develop due to child abuse and neglect have negative impacts that ripple across the lifespan, affecting children’s chances to succeed in school, work, and relationships. The Children’s Bureau supports the promotion of meaningful and measurable changes in children’s social and emotional well-being and recently completed work on the development of the ACYF protective factors conceptual model. The 2014 Resource Guide plays an important role in these efforts—offering support to service providers as they work with parents, caregivers, and their children to prevent child maltreatment and promote social and emotional well-being. To do so, the Resource Guide focuses on protective factors that build family strengths and promote optimal child and youth development. Information about protective factors is augmented with tools and strategies that help providers integrate the factors into community programs and systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Parent Handbook 2018-19 School Year
    Parent Handbook 2018-19 School Year East Point 1460 East Cleveland Avenue East Point, GA 30344 (404) 768-2111 Office (404) 768-2113 Fax Decatur 141 Sams St. Suite A* Decatur, GA 30030 (404) 370-3828 *Temporary location [email protected] www.littlelinguistspreschool.com 1 Revised May, 29, 2017 Parent Handbook Table of Contents I. Welcome and Introduction II. Philosophy and Belief III. School Goals IV. Programs and Ages of Children Served V. Curriculum Overview VI. Policies and Procedures VII. Admissions Policies and Procedures VIII. Missed Days IX. Deposits and Fees X. Financial Policy XI. Field Trips XII. Transportation XIII. Photo/Video Permission XIV. Parent Communication XV. Child Abuse, Neglect, and Deprivation XVI. Drop-Off and Pick-Up XVII. Escort Policy XVIII. Pick-Up Authorization XIX. Updated Information XX. Absences XXI. Illness Policy XXII. Medication XXIII. Children’s Records XXIV. Child Immunizations XXV. Custody Issues XXVI. Withdraw from the Summer Camp XXVII. Babysitting by School Faculty XXVIII. Children’s Classroom Procedures XXIX. Meals and Snacks XXX. Chokables XXXI. Children’s Library XXXII. Birthdays XXXIII. Lost and Found XXXIV. Family School Partnership XXXV. Scholarships 2 Revised May, 29, 2017 XXXVI. Parent Teacher Organization (PTO) XXXVII. Positive Guidance/Discipline XXXVIII. Supporting Developmental and Behavioral Needs XXXIX. Removal from Program XL. First Aid, Injuries, and Emergencies XLI. Language Policy XLII. Allergy/Dietary Restrictions Protocol XLIII. First Day of School XLIV. Final Thoughts 3 Revised May, 29, 2017 Parent Handbook I. Welcome and Introduction Welcome to our preschool family! We are thrilled that you have chosen Little Linguists International Preschool. We are confident that your family’s experience with our program will be enriching and fulfilling.
    [Show full text]