Deliverable D3.1 Virtual Coupling Communication Solutions Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Deliverable D3.1 Virtual Coupling Communication Solutions Analysis Ref. Ares(2020)7880497 - 22/12/2020 Deliverable D3.1 Virtual Coupling Communication Solutions Analysis Project Acronym: MOVINGRAIL Starting Date: 01/12/2018 Duration (Months): 25 Call (part) Identifier: H2020-S2R-OC-IP2-2018 Grant Agreement No.: 826347 Due Date of Deliverable: Month 10 Actual Submission Date: 25-09-2020 Responsible/Author: Bill Redfern (PARK) Dissemination Level: Public Status: Issued Reviewed: No G A 8 2 6 3 4 7 P a g e 1 | 63 Document history Revision Date Description 0.1 03-07-2020 First draft for comments and internal review 0.2 24-09-2020 Second draft 1.0 25-09-2020 Issued 1.1 22-12-2020 Update following comments from the Commission, added new section 4.2.1 Report contributors Name Beneficiary Details of contribution Short Name John Chaddock PARK Primary Curation. Identification and collation of source documentation. Document review. Bill Redfern PARK Literature review and solutions research. Requirements identification. Analysis of requirements and potential solutions. Descriptions and conclusions. John Marsden PARK Literature review and solutions research. Michael Duffy PARK Literature review and solutions research. Mark Cooper PARK Literature review and solutions research. Analysis. Format/editing. Andrew Wright PARK Document review. Lei Chen UoB Document review. Mohamed Samra UoB Document review. Paul van Koningsbruggen Technolution Document review. Rob Goverde TUD Document review, quality check and final editing. Funding This project has received funding from the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement No 826347. The JU receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and the Shift2Rail JU members other than the Union. Disclaimer The information in this document is provided “as is”, and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose. The content of this document reflects only the author`s view – the Joint Undertaking is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. The users use the information at their sole risk and liability. G A 8 2 6 3 4 7 P a g e 2 | 63 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... 6 List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. 7 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 8 Abbreviations and Acronyms ..................................................................................................... 9 1. Objective .......................................................................................................................... 12 1.1. S2R Context ............................................................................................................... 12 1.2. Requirements ............................................................................................................ 12 1.3. Literature Review ...................................................................................................... 12 1.4. Factor and SWOT Analysis ......................................................................................... 12 1.5. Critical Review ........................................................................................................... 12 2. Background ...................................................................................................................... 13 2.1. MOVINGRAIL ............................................................................................................. 13 2.2. Technology in the Railway Markets ........................................................................... 13 2.2.1. High Speed ......................................................................................................... 14 2.2.2. Conventional/Main Line .................................................................................... 14 2.2.3. Regional ............................................................................................................. 14 2.2.4. Urban/Suburban ................................................................................................ 14 2.2.4.1. Metro (Subway) or Rail Rapid Transit (RRT) ....................................................... 14 2.2.4.2. Light Rail Transit (LRT) ........................................................................................ 15 2.2.4.3. Tramway or Streetcar (STC) ................................................................................ 15 2.2.5. Freight ................................................................................................................ 15 2.3. ERTMS ....................................................................................................................... 16 2.3.1. ETML .................................................................................................................. 16 2.3.2. GSM-R ................................................................................................................ 16 2.3.2.1. Additional Railway Functions ............................................................................. 17 2.3.2.2. Obsolescence ..................................................................................................... 18 2.3.3. ETCS.................................................................................................................... 18 2.3.3.1. ETCS Level 1 ....................................................................................................... 18 2.3.3.2. ETCS Level 2 ....................................................................................................... 19 2.3.3.3. ETCS Level 3 ....................................................................................................... 20 2.4. CBTC .......................................................................................................................... 20 2.4.1. CBTC Characteristics .......................................................................................... 20 2.4.2. CBTC Communications ....................................................................................... 21 2.5. Wireless Train Backbone ........................................................................................... 22 G A 8 2 6 3 4 7 P a g e 3 | 63 3. Virtual Coupling ............................................................................................................... 23 3.1.1. Train Localisation ............................................................................................... 24 3.1.2. Virtual Coupling Sector Differences ................................................................... 24 3.1.3. Virtual Coupling Open Safety Challenges .......................................................... 25 4. Methodology ................................................................................................................... 26 4.1. High Level Requirements .......................................................................................... 26 4.1.1. Additional Input Material .................................................................................. 26 4.2. Solutions Capture ...................................................................................................... 27 4.2.1. Stakeholder Interviews ...................................................................................... 27 4.2.2. Literature Review ............................................................................................... 27 4.3. SWOT and Factor Analysis ......................................................................................... 27 5. High Level Virtual Coupling Communications Requirements .......................................... 28 5.1. Literature review for Virtual Coupling communication requirements ..................... 28 5.2. High Level Requirements .......................................................................................... 31 5.2.1. Virtual Coupling Functional Requirement - Performance ................................. 32 5.2.2. Virtual Coupling Non-functional Requirement - Reliability ............................... 32 5.3. Criteria to Analyse Solution Candidates .................................................................... 32 5.3.1. Basic Functionality ............................................................................................. 32 5.3.2. Latency ............................................................................................................... 33 5.3.3. Bandwidth and Spectral Efficiency .................................................................... 33 5.3.4. Link Reliability .................................................................................................... 33 5.3.5. Setup Time ......................................................................................................... 33 5.3.6. Range and Speed ............................................................................................... 34 5.3.7. Peer-to-peer (P2P) ............................................................................................. 34 5.3.8. Congestion Management/Multiple Access ....................................................... 34 5.3.9. Technology Readiness .......................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Communication Technologies Support to Railway Infrastructure and Operations
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 06, 2021 Communication Technologies Support to Railway Infrastructure and Operations Sniady, Aleksander Link to article, DOI: 10.11581/DTU:00000010 Publication date: 2015 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Sniady, A. (2015). Communication Technologies Support to Railway Infrastructure and Operations. DTU Fotonik. https://doi.org/10.11581/DTU:00000010 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Communication Technologies Support to Railway Infrastructure and Operations Aleksander Sniady Ph.D. Thesis May 2015 Communication Technologies Support to Railway Infrastructure and Operations Aleksander Sniady´ Ph.D. Thesis Networks Technology & Service Platforms DTU Fotonik Technical University of Denmark May 2015 To my parents and grandparents. Supervisors: José Soler Lars Dittmann Technical University of Denmark DTU Fotonik Department of Photonics Engineering This thesis is a part of RobustRailS project, Ørsteds Plads, Building 343, which is funded by The Danish Council for 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark Strategic Research.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling of Crosstalk in High Speed Planar Structure Parallel Data Buses and Suppression by Uniformly Spaced Short Circuits Gabriel A
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-29-2012 Modeling of Crosstalk in High Speed Planar Structure Parallel Data Buses and Suppression by Uniformly Spaced Short Circuits Gabriel A. Solana Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI12050215 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Solana, Gabriel A., "Modeling of Crosstalk in High Speed Planar Structure Parallel Data Buses and Suppression by Uniformly Spaced Short Circuits" (2012). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 606. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/606 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida MODELING OF CROSSTALK IN HIGH SPEED PLANAR STRUCTURE PARALLEL DATA BUSES AND SUPPRESSION BY UNIFORMLY SPACED SHORT CIRCUITS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING by Gabriel Alejandro Solana 2012 To: Dean Amir Mirmiran College of Engineering and Computing This thesis, written by Gabriel Alejandro Solana, and entitled, Modeling of Crosstalk in High Speed Planar Structure Parallel Data Buses and Suppression by Uniformly Spaced Short Circuits, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this thesis and recommend that it be approved. _____________________________________________________ Stavros V. Georgakopoulos _____________________________________________________ Jean H.
    [Show full text]
  • Capacitors Demystified: Practical Information on Capacitor Usage in EE133
    EE133–Winter 2004 Capacitors Demystified Capacitors Demystified: Practical information on capacitor usage in EE133 Why do I need to read this? Despite all we know about capacitors from previous exposure (including everyone’s favorite capacitor fact – ‘Well, I know the voltage across a capacitor cannot change instantaneously!’), there is a quite a bit about the (good) properties and (bad) non- idealities of these devices that effects the way they are actually used in RF circuits. So, with the practical predisposition of EE133, let’s take another look at our old friend… The Starting Line-up Like fine cheeses or candy bars, capacitors come in wide variety of sizes, shapes, and prices- and they can be made from a host of different materials (except for nougat). However, all of these characteristics are interrelated because, in classic Murphy fashion, a capacitor that ranks well in one or two of these properties is usually terrible in the other categories. The physical size and shape are only of marginal importance to us since the former is pretty much irrelevant at the size of our solder board and the latter is only for aesthetics (which is a foreign term to EE’s anyway). But, the composite material is an important factor in determining the behavior of the capacitor, so for the purpose of this class we will identify four major types (Refer to page 21 of “The Art of Electronics” by Horowitz & Hill for a more complete listing of capacitor families): Material/Comments Picture Ceramics (10 pF – 22µF): Inexpensive, but not good at high frequencies Tantalum (0.1µF – 500µF): Polarized, low inductance Electrolytic (0.1µF – 75µF): Polarized, not good at high frequencies (NOTE: longer lead is usually the positive terminal) Silver Mica (1 pF – 4.7 nF): Expensive with only small capacitive values, but great for RF 1 EE133–Winter 2004 Capacitors Demystified Some Commonly Asked Questions about Capacitors Resistors are color-coded.
    [Show full text]
  • Coupling for Power Line Communication: a Survey Luis Guilherme Da S
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, VOL. 32, NO. 1, 2017. 8 Coupling for Power Line Communication: A Survey Luis Guilherme da S. Costa, Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz, Bamidele Adebisi, Vinicius L. R. da Costa, and Moises V. Ribeiro Abstract—The advent of power line communication (PLC) electric power cables. These power cables could be alternating for smart grids, vehicular communications, internet of things current (AC) or direct current (DC) power lines and the signals and data network access has recently gained ample interest in of PLC transceivers are subsequently coupled to them via a industry and academia. Due to the characteristics of electric power grids and regulatory constraints, the effectiveness of coupling circuit. In the case of power lines used to transmit coupling between the power line and PLC transceivers has AC power, the coupling circuit has also to filter out the AC become a very important issue. Coupling devices used to inject or mains signal. On the other hand, the coupling circuit simply extract data communication signals into or from power lines are has to block the DC mains voltage of the DC electric power very important components of a PLC system. There is, however, grids. an obvious gap in the literature for a detailed review of existing PLC couplers. In this paper, we present a comprehensive review During the late 1970s and early 1980s, new investigations of couplers, which are required for narrowband and broadband to characterize electric power grids as a medium for data PLC transceivers. Prevailing issues that protract the design of communication showed a higher potential in the range of couplers and consequently subtended the inventions of different frequencies between 5 kHz and 500 kHz [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Beam, Coupling Impedance
    Beam Impedance, Coupling Impedance, and Measurements using the Wire Technique John Staples, LBNL Beam, Coupling Impedance When a particle beam of current I travels through a structure, it may give up some of its energy to that structure, reducing its energy. The energy loss may be expressed as a voltage V, and the beam impedance Zb of the structure itself may be expressed as V loss Z b = I beam The structure may be a monitor device, where a signal V is generated by the beam and detected. In this case, we can define a coupling impedance Zp for the structure V monitor Z p = I beam In general, these are not the same, and each depends on the details of the structure itself. Stripline Monitor A beam bunch, as it travels down a pipe, induces images charges on the interior surface of the pipe. If the pipe is smooth and lossless, these charges do not affect the beam. An irregular beam pipe, however, will interact with the beam, as fields are induced in the beam pipe by the beam. The fields of a relativistic beam are concentrated along the direction of motion. One very useful type of monitor is the stripline monitor, which responds to the image charges. An electrode or electrodes are mounted in the beam pipe. Each end of the electrode is brought out and connected to a load. The electrode subtends and angle q. The geometry of the stripline resembles that of a microstrip, which has a characteristic surge impedance. The propagation velocity of an impulse along the stripline is assumed to be the speed of light c.
    [Show full text]
  • Coupled Transmission Lines As Impedance Transformer
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Sep 25, 2021 Coupled Transmission Lines as Impedance Transformer Jensen, Thomas; Zhurbenko, Vitaliy; Krozer, Viktor; Meincke, Peter Published in: IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques Link to article, DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2007.909617 Publication date: 2007 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Jensen, T., Zhurbenko, V., Krozer, V., & Meincke, P. (2007). Coupled Transmission Lines as Impedance Transformer. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 55(12), 2957-2965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2007.909617 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. 1 Coupled Transmission Lines as Impedance Transformer Thomas Jensen, Vitaliy Zhurbenko, Viktor Krozer, Peter Meincke Technical University of Denmark, Ørsted•DTU, ElectroScience, Ørsteds Plads, Building 348, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark, Phone:+45-45253861, Fax: +45-45931634, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract— A theoretical investigation of the use of a coupled line transformer.
    [Show full text]
  • Australasian TETRA Forum
    TETRA & CRITICAL COMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION Study on the relative merits of TETRA, LTE and other broadband technologies for critical communications markets Final version 1.1: February 2015 P3 communications GmbH Am Kraftversorgungsturm 3 (Alter Schlachthof) 52070 Aachen Germany www.p3-group.com/en/communications-gmbh-46867.html Version 1.1 P3 communications GmbH February 2015 Page 1 of 29 TCCA study on TETRA, LTE and other broadband technologies for critical communications markets Table of contents 1 Executive summary .............................................................................................. 4 2 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Background .................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Study objectives ............................................................................................ 8 2.3 Scope ........................................................................................................... 8 3 The Critical Communications market by sector ...................................................10 3.1 PPDR / Public Safety ...................................................................................10 3.2 Transport .....................................................................................................10 3.3 Utilities .........................................................................................................12 3.4 Industrial
    [Show full text]
  • Capacitors Capacitors
    Capacitors There seems to be a lot of hype and mystery concerning the sound of capacitors, the quality of capacitors and what capacitors actually do in a circuit. There are many types of capacitors including ceramic, polyester, polypropylene, polycarbonate silver mica, tantalum and electrolytic. Each has its own area of “expertise”. One type of capacitor will perform well in a particular application and perform poorly in another. A capacitor is simply two metal plates separated by a dielectric. An electrical charge is stored between these two plates. The plates and dielectric can be made form several different types of material. The closer the plates are, the higher the capacitance and the larger the area of the plates, the larger the capacitance. The dielectric material affects the capacitance as well. Here is some brief information about the particular types. Note: The unit of capacitance is the Farad. It is a very large unit and so we use the following to express capacitance Microfarad is one millionth of a farad. Picofarad is one millionth of a microfarad So 0.001mfd is equal to 1000 picofarad (pF) The above diagram shows a simple representation of a capacitor. The capacitor is shown in RED . In parallel with the plates of the capacitor is a resistance, InsInsIns-Ins ---ResRes of the insulation. Teflon has the highest resistance with polystyrene, polypropylene and polycarbonate coming in second. Third is polyester and then the ceramics COG, Z5U and XR7 with tantalum and aluminium last. Dap is the Dielectric Absorption. All capacitors when charged to a particular voltage and then the leads are shorted, will recover some of their charge after the short is removed.
    [Show full text]
  • Level Crossings: a Guide for Managers, Designers and Operators Railway Safety Publication 7
    Level Crossings: A guide for managers, designers and operators Railway Safety Publication 7 December 2011 Contents Foreword 4 What is the purpose of this guide? 4 Who is this guide for? 4 Introduction 5 Why is managing level crossing risk important? 5 What is ORR’s policy on level crossings? 5 1. The legal framework 6 Overview 6 Highways and planning law 7 2. Managing risks at level crossings 9 Introduction 9 Level crossing types – basic protection and warning arrangements 12 General guidance 15 Gated crossings operated by railway staff 16 Barrier crossings operated by railway staff 17 Barrier crossings with obstacle detection 19 Automatic half barrier crossings (AHBC) 21 Automatic barrier crossings locally monitored (ABCL) 23 Automatic open crossings locally monitored (AOCL) 25 Open crossings 28 User worked crossings (UWCs) for vehicles 29 Footpath and bridleway crossings 30 Foot crossings at stations 32 Provision for pedestrians at public vehicular crossings 32 Additional measures to protect against trespass 35 The crossing 36 Gates, wicket gates and barrier equipment 39 Telephones and telephone signs 41 Miniature stop lights (MSL) 43 Traffic signals, traffic signs and road markings 44 3. Level crossing order submissions 61 Overview and introduction 61 Office of Rail Regulation | December 2011 | Level crossings: a guide for managers, designers and operators 2 Background and other information on level crossing management 61 Level crossing orders: scope, content and format 62 Level crossing order request and consideration process 64 Information
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Level Crossings 4
    RSC-G-006-B Guidelines For The Design Of Section 5 Railway Infrastructure And Rolling Stock LEVEL CROSSINGS 5 LEVEL CROSSINGS 4 5.1. THE PRINCIPLES 4 5.2. GENERAL GUIDANCE 5 5.2.1. General description 5 5.2.2. Structure of the guidance 5 5.2.3. Positioning of level crossings 5 5.2.4. Equipment at level crossings 5 5.2.5. Effects on existing level crossings 6 5.2.6. Operating conditions 6 5.3. TYPES OF CROSSINGS 7 5.3.1. Types of crossing 7 5.3.2. Conditions for suitability 9 5.4. GATED CROSSINGS OPERATED BY RAILWAY STAFF 12 5.4.1. General description (for user worked gates see section 5.8) 12 5.4.2. Method of operation 12 5.4.3. Railway signalling and control 12 5.5. BARRIER CROSSINGS OPERATED BY RAILWAY STAFF (MB) 13 5.5.1. General description 13 5.5.2. Method of operation 13 5.5.3. Railway signalling and control 14 5.6. AUTOMATIC HALF BARRIER CROSSINGS (AHB) 15 5.6.1. General description 15 5.6.2. Method of operation 15 5.6.3. Railway signalling and control 16 5.7. AUTOMATIC OPEN CROSSING (AOC) 17 5.7.1. General description 17 5.7.2. Method of operation 17 5.7.3. Railway signalling and control 18 5.8. USER-WORKED CROSSINGS (UWC) WITH GATES OR LIFTING BARRIERS 19 5.8.1. General description 19 5.8.2. Method of operation 19 5.9. PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS (PC) PRIVATE OR PUBLIC FOOTPATH 21 5.9.1.
    [Show full text]
  • AN-937 Designing Amplifier Circuits
    AN-937 APPLICATION NOTE One Technology Way • P. O. Box 9106 • Norwood, MA 02062-9106, U.S.A. • Tel: 781.329.4700 • Fax: 781.461.3113 • www.analog.com Designing Amplifier Circuits: How to Avoid Common Problems by Charles Kitchin INTRODUCTION down toward the negative supply. The bias voltage is amplified When compared to assemblies of discrete semiconductors, by the closed-loop dc gain of the amplifier. modern operational amplifiers (op amps) and instrumenta- This process can be lengthy. For example, an amplifier with a tion amplifiers (in-amps) provide great benefits to designers. field effect transistor (FET) input, having a 1 pA bias current, Although there are many published articles on circuit coupled via a 0.1-μF capacitor, has an IC charging rate, I/C, of applications, all too often, in the haste to assemble a circuit, 10–12/10–7 = 10 μV per sec basic issues are overlooked leading to a circuit that does not function as expected. This application note discusses the most or 600 μV per minute. If the gain is 100, the output drifts at common design problems and offers practical solutions. 0.06 V per minute. Therefore, a casual lab test, using an ac- coupled scope, may not detect this problem, and the circuit MISSING DC BIAS CURRENT RETURN PATH may not fail until hours later. It is important to avoid this One of the most common application problems encountered is problem altogether. the failure to provide a dc return path for bias current in ac- +VS coupled op amp or in-amp circuits.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of Bidirectional Coupling Circuit for Broadband Power-Line Communications
    Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications, 2012, 4, 162-166 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jemaa.2012.44021 Published Online April 2012 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/jemaa) Design of Bidirectional Coupling Circuit for Broadband Power-Line Communications Syed Samser Ali1, Amitabha Bhattacharya2, Dipak Ranjan Poddar3 1Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Durgapur Institute of Advanced Technology & Management, Durgapur, India; 2Department of Electronics & Electrical Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India; 3Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India. Email: [email protected] Received February 14th, 2012; revised March 12th, 2012; accepted March 24th, 2012 ABSTRACT This paper deals with the design of bidirectional coupler for broadband power line communication and the impedance matching technique with the power line. This coupler can be used for both transmitting and receiving the data, acting as transceiver. The impedance mismatching problem is also solved here using line trap circuit. The coupler circuit is capa- ble of transmitting or receiving modulated signals with carrier frequency of 15 MHz which can be used for domestic as well as distribution power networks. Laboratory prototype tested using power line network consists of electrical house- hold appliances and results show that the circuit is able to facilitate bidirectional band pass transmission. Keywords: Coupling Circuits; Line Trap Circuit; Broadband 1. Introduction here can facilitate bidirectional communication. Power lines may be a cheap and good networking option 2. PLC System in the sense that they are almost a universally present infrastructure. The conventional power line can be effec- A typical PLC system is made up of traditional power tively utilized for broadband communication.
    [Show full text]