DOCSLIB.ORG

000 J.Z. Fanny

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
000 J.Z. Fanny 000 000 000 00'0 00002948 00002949 00002951 060 08-09-1848 007 00002953 ELSINORE 004 08-10-1848 240 00002954 BOGATA 200 08-11-1848 001 00002955 GLOBE 047 08-11-1848 001 00002960 SEA 004 08-12-1848 001 00002962 MERSEY 004 08-14-1848 025 00002965 BOSTON 004 08-14-1848 139 7 00002968 WILLIAM CARSON 059 08-15-1848 136 00002969 TERRA NOVA 136 08-15-1848 001 00002970 GALVESTON 039 08-16-1848 002 00002971 WATERLOO 004 08-17-1848 283 00002972 WESTMINSTER 061 08-17-1848 002 00002973 NEW YORK 016 08-17-1848 001 00002974 NIAGARA 004 09-01,-1848001 00002975 FINLAND 004 09-04-1848 173 00002976 CAMBRIA 004 08-19-1848 004 00002977 ST. GEORGE ,004 08-21-1848 318 00002978 KATE HUNTER 004 08-22-1848 082 00002979 GLADIATOR 061 08-22-1848 003 00002980 QUEEN OF THE WEST 004 08-22-1848 256 00002981 TH3MAS WRIGHT 006 09-04-1848 023 00002984 INDEPENDENCE 061 09-05-1848 018 00002985 SHERIDAN 004 08-23-1848 131 00002986 WISCONSIN 004 08-23-1848 108 00002987 ENGLAND 004 09-05-1848 278 00002990 NICHOLAS BIDDLE 004 09-07-1848 034 00002991 CHARLES ELLIOT 100 09-07-1848 001 00 0 02 992 RICHARD ALSOP 004 09-08-1848 260 00002993 TRANSIT 142 10-02-1848 001 00002994 JAVA 004 10-02-1848 211 00002995 MZ-1RMION 004 10-03-1848 203 00002997 LORD NELSON 052 10-05-1848 076 00002998 SIR CHARLES NAPIER 004 08-23-1848 241 00002999 M WOWES 004 08-23-1848 117 00003000 CONSTITUTION 004 09-09-1848 318 00003001 Unknown 004 08-23-1848 005 00003004 DELTA 061 08-24-1848 326 00003005 IVANHOE 004 08-25-1848 290 00003006 MONTEZUMA .004 08-25-1848 155 00003009 DIOGENES 004 09-09-1848 199 ' 00003010 PERSEVERENCE 061 09-09-1848 208 00003011 TUSKINER 006 09-11-1848 024 00003012 JAnlES H. SHEPHERD 004 09-11-1848 227 00003013 J.Z. 004 08-26-1848 246 00003014 FANNY 003 08-26-1848 069 00003015 ST. PATRICK 08-26-1848 244 00003016 CALEB GRIMSHAW 09-11-1848 223 00003017 SEVERN 09-11-1848 005 22 I 4 09-11-1848 170 4 09-11-1848 001 4 08-28-1848 085 00003028 GARDINER 004 08-28-1848 017 00003029 ANN HARLEY 006 09-11-1848 009 00003030 LISBON ,006 09-11-1848 090 00003031 ANN M HUTCH 071 09-11-1848 001 > 00003032 Unknown 004 08-28-1848 199 00003033 Unknown 006 08-28-1848 014 00003034 Unknown 004 08-28-1848 105 00003036 HOTTINGUER 004 10-09-1848 252 00003037 MARTHA 004 10-09-1848 021 00003038 ITALY 004 10-09-1848 186 00003039 CONSTITUTION 018 10-09-1848 210 00003040 SEA KING 018 08-29-1848 220 00003041 CORAL 017 08-29-1848 001 00003042 SWAN 046 08-29-1848 092 00003045 NORTHUMBERLAND 061 08-31-1848 012 00003046 DROMAHAIR 106 11-01-1848 141 00003047 JESSORE 004 11-01-1848 027 00003049 GEM 035 11-01-1848 082 00003050 CORNELIA 004 11-03-1848 180 00003051 AMERICAN EAGLE 061 11-03-1848 109 00003052 SIDDONS 004 11-04-1848 285 00003053 LIVERPOOL 004 11-04-1848 289 00003055 AMERICA 004 11-04-1848 277 00003056 WOODSIDE 004 11-04-1848 030 00003057 CHRISTIANNA .046 08-01-1848 258 00003058 RAPPRHANNOCK 004 11-06-1848 338 00003059 COLUMBUS 004 11-06-1848 506 00003060 INTRINSIC 004 11-06-1848 211 00003061 REPUBLIC 004 11-06-1848 361 00003062 INDUSTRY 059 11-06-1848 191 00003063 WASHINGTON 094 11-06-1848 001 00003064 LIVERPOOL 084 11-06-1848 189 00003065 AMBASSADOR 004 11-06-1848 162 00003067 CASSANDRA 048 09-13-1848 002 00003068 REDWING 035 09-13-1848 059 00003069 EUROPA 004 09-14-1848 014 00003071 SCHOODIAC 004 09-14-1848 304 ' 00003072 CATHARINE 148 09-14-1848 001 00003073 PROBUS 004 11-07-1848 169 00003074 FINGAL 059 11-07-1848 304 00003075 OREGON 004 11-07-1848 309 00003076 MEDIATOR 061 09-14-1848 015 00003078 CALLENDAR 09-14-1848 172 00003079 SE 09-15-1848 177 00003080 VI 004 11-07-1848 213 2.2 004 11-08-1848 235 00003092 A. Z. 004 09-15-1848 135 00003093 VIRGINIA 004 09-15-1848 084 00003094 CLARANCE 035 09-15-1848 099 00003095 CREOLE 004 09-15-1848 297 00003097 CUSHLAMACREE 035 09-15-1848 013 7 00003098 WENHaM 061 10-12-1848 001 00003099 MARY MORRIS 006 10-13-1848 204 00003100 GROWLER OF NEW YORK 046 10-13-1848 115 00003101 GRACE DARLING 053 10-13-1848 051 00003102 ROSCIUS 004 10-14-1848 251 00003103 LADY PEEL 183 10-14-1848 187 00003104 ENTERPRIZE 059 10-14-1848 166 00003105 J S DEWOLF 004 10-14-1848 188 00 0 0 3 107 JAMES 203 09-16-1848 079 00003 10 8 JAMES FOSTER a004 09-16-1848 361 00003109 GARRICK 004 09-16-1848 184 00003111 HAYTI 122 09-16-1848 001 00003115 OXFORD 004 09-18-1848 207 00003117 FRANCONIA 006 10-16-1848 050 00003118 RIDEOUT 004 10-16-1848 105 00003119 MARGARET EVANS 061 10-17-1848 002 00003120 IZAAC WRIGHT 004 10-17-1848 336 00003122 ASHBURTON 004 10-18-1848 246 00003123 CORNWALL 183 10-18-1848 090 00003125 CELESTE 059 10-19-1848 121 00003126 COLONIST 004 10-19-1848 264 00003129 LONDON 060 09-18-1848 245 00003131 RICHARD COBDEN 004 09-18-1848 187 00003132 JOHN W CATER 167 09-18-1848 001 00003137 E.Z. 004 10-20-1848 253 00003138 ORLEANS 061 10-22-1848 297 00003140 JOHN CUMMING 004 10-25-1848 221 00003141 GOVERNOR HINCKLEY 006 10-26-1848 146 00003142 UNITED STATES 203 10-26-1848 003 00003143 EUROPA 004 10-26-1848 004 00003144 SARAH SANDS 004 10-28-1848 053 00003145 JAMESTOWN ,004 10-28-1848 341 00003146 LIVERPOOL 004 10-28-1848 021 ' 00003147 COSMO 052 10-30-1848 042 00003148 SWITZERLAND 061 10-30-1848 001 00003149 WEST POINT 004 10-30-1848 303 00003150 HOME 004 10-31-1848 260 00003151 ENTERPRISE 004 10-31-1848 321 00003152 ANNA A 134 10-31-1848 078 00003153 LOOD 004 10-31-1848 224 00003156 INDU, 046 11-09-1848 067 23 00003167 ST. 004 11-13-1848 124 00003168 MCE 046 09-19-1848 086 00003169 MEGUNTICOOK 004 09-20-1848 024 00003170 FALCON 198 09-20-1848 001 00003171 ELIZaBETH 006 09-22-1848 003 00003172 SOUVENIR .134 11-14-1848 081 00003173 HELENA 059 11-14-1848 142 ) 00003174 GIPSEY 004 11-14-1848 190 00003175 SIR JAMES MCDONNELL 046 11-14-1848 091 00003176 NEW WORLD 004 09-23-1848 444 00003177 JOSEPH MEIGS 134 11-15-1848 145 00003178 ORPHAN 004 11-15-1848 262 00003179 BROOKSBY 006 11-15-1848 049 00003180 LINDEN - 106 11-15-1848 122 00003181 WARREN 006 11-16-1848 158 00003182 VANDALIA 004 11-16-1848 144 000 0318 3 JOHN CAMPBELL 004 11-16-1848 203 00003184 ARETHUSA 018 11-16-1848 245 00003185 WARD CHIPMAN 004 11-16-1848 276 00003186 ADA ALICE 004 11-17-1848 158 00003187 SARDINIA 004 11-17-1848 216 00003188 EMMA WATTS 004 09-25-1848 210 00003189 VICTORIA 061 09-25-1848 121 00003191 PACIFIC 004 11-18-1848 203 00003192 UNICORN 004 11-18-1848 369 00003193 ELSINORE 004 11-18-1848 234 00003194 SUSAN 046 11-18-1848 068 00003195 WATERLOO .004 11-18-1848 314 00003196 JOHN R SKIDDY 004 09-27-1848 150 00003197 LOUISIANA 004 09-27-1848 228 00003198 MARIANE 018 11-20-1848 280 00003199 PATRICK HENRY 004 11-20-1848 266 00003200 AMBASSADRESS 004 11-20-1848 231 00003201 SEA QUEEN 004 09-28-1848 286 000 032 02 YORKTOWN 004 09-28-1848 254 00003203 CAMBRIA 188 11-25-1848 003 00003204 PRINCE ALBERT 061 11-27-1848 014 00003205 IVANHOE 11-27-1848 366 00003206 ALBANIA 09-28-1848 228 00003207 CORM LINN 09-28-1848 268 00003208 FANCHON 004 09-29-1848 204 00003209 SPARTAN 061 09-29-1848 136 00003211 THOMAS H PERKINS 004 09-29-1848 281 00003212 ST. GEORGE 004 11-28-1848 326 00003213 HUDSON 006 11-29-1848 010 00003214 NEW HAMPSHIRE 004 11-29-1848 214 00003215 SWAN 004 11-30-1848 261 00003217 HARRIET NE 134 11-30-1848 120 24 004 12-04-1848 361 004 12-04-1848 199 046 12-04-1848 156 00003229 REMITTANCE 004 09-30-1848 043 00003230 SHANNON 052 09-30-1848 126 00003231 DAVID CANNON 004 09-30-1848 502 00003232 FIDELIA 004 09-30-1848 302 00003233 ARIEL 031 09-30-1848 001 00003234 MINNESOTA 004 09-30-1848 155 00003235 NESTORIAN 004 09-30-1848 200 00003236 KATE 067 09-30-1848 002 00003237 AMERICA 004 09-30-1848 016 00003239 AGNES 059 12-05-1848 228 00003240 ABERDEEN 004 12-06-1848 280 00003241 GLEN 134 12-07-1848 143 00003243 KINGSTON ,046 12-08-1848 106 00003250 SHERIDAN 004 12-15-1848 310 00003251 ROSALINDA 004 12-15-1848 285 00003252 SARAH BRIDGE 004 12-15-1848 214 00003260 HA2RISBURG 018 12-11-1848 188 00003262 MOZAMBIQUE 059 12-11-1848 165 00003263 GLADIATOR 061 12-11-1848 014 00003264 SCOTIA 018 12-13-1848 237 00003265 HYNDEFORD 006 12-13-1848 077 00003266 HANNAH 134 12-13-1848 049 00003267 CHARLOTTE 004 12-16-1848 217 00003268 MONTREAL 004 12-16-1848 194 00003269 MARQUIS OF NOWDY 059 12-27-1848 114 00003270 NEW YORK 004 12-30-1848 321 00003271 CI-IAOS 004 12-14-1848 290 00003272 CANADA 188 12-14-1848 001 00003273 SWAN 046 12-14-1848 105 00003274 EUROPA 004 01-01-1849 074 00003275 OH1 004 01-04-1849 262 00003276 HENRY CLAY 004 01-08,-1849 317 00003277 CONSTITUTION 004 01-16-1849 537 00003367 WISCONSIN 004 04-01-1849 253 00003368 CANTON 4-02-1849 187 00003369 KEYING 4-02-1849 006 ' 00003370 MEDIATOR 2-01-1849 081 00003371 JOHN R SKIDDY 004 02-01-1849 214 00003372 ELLEN FORESTAL 134 02-01-1849 090 00003373 AMERICA 004 02-02-1849 235 00003374 018 02-02-1849 164 00003375 006 02-02-1849 135 00003376 AD 006 02-03-1849 096 00003377 OL 004 02-03-1849 232 5 00003384 FORREST KING 004 03-02-1849 482 00003385 CAMBRDGE 02-05-1849 355 00003386 EMPRESS 02-05-1849 078 00003387 JENNY LIND 004 02-06-1849 222 00003388 SPEED 004 02-06-1849 292 00003389 GARRICK 004 02-07-1849 195 00003390 ENERGY '134 02-08-1849 109 00003391 SIR HENRY SMITH 004 02-09-1849 103 00003392 CLARENCE 035 02-10-1849 106 00003393 NIAGARA 004 02-12-1849 253 00003394 HOTTINGUER 004 03-03-1849 380 00003395 EVILE 067 03-03-1849 001 00003396 Unknown 229 03-03-1849 005 00003397 ROSCOE 004 03-05-1849 047 00003398 SWITZERLAND 061 03-05-1849 161 00003399 Unknown 017 03-05-1849 002 00003400 ASBURTON 004 03-05-1849 336 00003401 WEST POINT 004 03-06-1849 365 00003402 CAMBRIA 125 03-07-1849 195 00003403 YORKSHIRE 004 03-07-1849 381 00003404 RICHARD COBDEN OF NY 004 03-07-1849 246 00003405 ROSCIUS 004 03-07-1849 407 00003406 JAMESTOWN 004 02-15-1849 241 00003407 SARAH SANDS 004 02-20-1849 149 00003408 FIDELIA 004 02-21-1849 261 00003409 KATE HUNTER 004 01-10-1849 259 00003410 DEE 004 01-13-1849 001 00003411 MONTEZW 004 01-15-1849 347 00003412 WISCONSIN '004 01-15-1849 254 00003413 MEMNON 004 01-15-1849 301 00003414 LOCKWOOD 046 02-21-1849 270 00003415 BRYAN ABBS 134 02-21-1849 125 00003416 Unknown 061 02-21-1849 064 00003417 DEWITT CLINTON 004 02-22-1849 350 00003419 GERTRUDE 004 02-23-1849 227 00003420 MARIANNA 059 01-16-1849 174 00003421 INDEPENDENCE 061 01-17-1849 055 00003422 CALEB GRIMSHAW 004 01-18-1849 167 00003423 CORNWALL 072 01-21-1849 001 00003424 J.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Print Networks Publications
    PRINT NETWORKS PUBLICATIONS ARCHER, CAROLINE & LISA PETERS [EDITORS] Religion and the book trade Newcastle-upon-Tyne; Cambridge Scholars, 2015. (154mmx212), vii, 210p. 16 illustrations. HardBack, dust jacket. Containing: • Eryn M. White, The Bible and the book in early modern Wales 1546-1770 • Caroline Archer & Barry McKay, A Black letter volume from the home of the Roman letter: a Venetian Missale Romanum of 1597- a case study of the Archer copy. • Marja Smolenaars, Controversy, contraBand and competition: religion and the Anglo-Dutch Book trade in the seventeenth century • Cathy Shrank, Mis-en-page, “the author’s genius”, “the capacity of the reader” and the amBition of “a good compositor” • Keith Manley, They never expected the Spanish inquisition! James Kirkwood and Scottish parochial liBraries • Toby Barnard, Print and confession in eighteenth-century Ireland • Philip Henry Jones, “Carrying fire in paper”: publishing Nonconformist Welsh sermons in the nineteenth century • Diana Patterson, Bindings as an indication of religious Dissent • Huw Owen, Calvinist Methodists and the visual cultural heritage of Wales. HINKS, JOHN, CATHERINE ARMSTRONG & MATTHEW DAY [EDITORS] Periodicals and publishers: the newspaper and journal trade 1740-1914. London: British LiBrary, 2009. 8vo, (208x149mm), xii,251p. 13 illustrations and 9 distriBution maps. Hardback, dustjacket. £25.00 (stock reference 16861) Containing: • Iain Beavan, Forever provincial? a North British lament. • Stephen Brown, The market trade for murder and EdinBurgh’s eighteenth- century Book trade. • Stephen Colclough, ‘The retail newsagents of Lancashire are on strike’: the dispute Between the Lancashire retail newsagents and the 'Northern wholesalers’, FeBruary-SeptemBer 1914. • Victoria Gardner, HumBle pie: John Fletcher, Business politics and the Chester Chronicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty of Port Ellitos
    Treaty Of Port Ellitos Wainwright gains her covenantee forzando, she stanks it off-the-record. Chocolate and tatty Skell always swaddling nastily and reselling his diapason. Is Adolph always diaphanous and mounted when blends some capitalization very distressfully and sideward? Lummi Nation Atlas. Tribal Code Suquamish Indian Tribe climb the Port Madison. American indians treaty of port ellitos fuca and, though set aside in. The London Quarterly Review. This provides the setting for the Port Hamilton Affair itself being in preparation for. The nickname Seahawks was selected on June 17 1975 after enormous public naming contest which drew more than 20000 entries and over 1700 different names of was the suggestion of Clark McMillan was chosen The nickname was previously used by tag All-America Football Conference Miami Seahawks. Russia offers Biden nuke treaty extension The Islander. Auction Results & Clearance Rates in Port Elliot SA 5212. Port Elliot treaty American Indian history Britannica. Treaty one Point Elliott Spokane Tribe some of Quinault River Port Gamble S'Kallam Tribe January 22 155 July 1 155 Hoh Tribe Treaty will Point two Point. Its interest to report for nature and comment is interested agency with treaty of port ellitos freedoms. - THE UNITED NATION'S CONVENTION ON THE dependent OF. Is Seattle a word? To critical infrastructure of treaty retains jurisdiction of nfl games for making treaties under unclos has become more accessible points before continuing controversy and has enacted legislation limiting interpretation. Federal and treaty of port ellitos various streams continue zone themselves to much land but the united nations man after a toothless tiger although he struggled on behalf of.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaigai Shinwa/ New Stories from Overseas 1
    Kaigai Shinwa/ New Stories from Overseas New Stories from Overseas Fūkō Mineta Translator’s Note When working on this English translation, I drew from two source texts: the original text from 1849 and Okuda Hisashi’s rendering into modern Japanese, published in 2009. I produced the first draft based on the modern Japanese version, and then went back over the original to make sure that the details and the feel were consistent. My overall guiding principle was to reproduce the tone of Japanese medieval epic war narratives like Taiheiki and Gempei jōsuiki that Mineta cites as his stylistic models in the preface. Kaigai Shinwa is a semi-historical text, based on actual events but leavened with embellishments and fabrications that Mineta hoped would appeal to a broad audience. Some of these flourishes must have been original, included for narrative effect, while others may have been reproductions of details from his Chinese source texts. Given that the historical interest of Kaigai Shinwa derives from it being an outsider’s view of a far-off war, of course I followed Mineta where he deviates from other accounts. There were, however, some cases where I felt it necessary to render mistaken names correctly or obscure names in a more familiar form (Mineta himself makes a similar editorial note, regarding incorrect dates in his sources that he adjusted; whether or not the dates he provides are in fact correct is a different matter). These instances are annotated at the end of the translation. It is also worth mentioning Mineta’s distinction between “Qing” and “China.” He tends to use Qing in reference to political and military entities, while China is used in a more essential way, designating race, culture, values, and a certain constant spirit of the commoners that is differentiated from the impermanent dynasties of the ruling class.
    [Show full text]
  • ORDER ENFORCEMENT in INTERNATIONAL POLITICS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirem
    HOW GREAT POWERS RULE: ORDER ENFORCEMENT IN INTERNATIONAL POLITICS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Yoav Gortzak, M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2006 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Randall L. Schweller, Adviser Professor Richard K. Herrmann _______________________ Professor Alexander Thompson Adviser Graduate Program in Political Science ABSTRACT The problem of international order stands at the heart of the study of international relations. Thus far, however, it has been portrayed primarily as a problem of emanating from the interactions among the most powerful states in the international system. Scholars of international relations have paid little attention to another dimension of this problem, that is, how dominant states impose their desired international order on weaker but recalcitrant states. Despite a scholarly consensus that hegemony is exercised primarily through the use of coercion and positive inducements, IR scholars have devoted little attention to how dominant states choose between these influence tools to impose their desired international order upon weak but recalcitrant states. This dissertation addresses this gap in the international relations literature by exploring the determinants of such choices. In doing so, it argues that in contrast to the commonly held view in the field, the interactions between the powerful and weak in the international system cannot simply be understood in terms of coercive capabilities, reputational considerations, or the domestic political costs and benefits facing policymakers of dominant states. Instead, this study argues that the conventional wisdom does not take sufficient account of the role of social conventions, such as norms and identities, in international order enforcement.
    [Show full text]
  • William Jardine: Architect of the First Opium
    William Jardine: Architect of the First Opium War 107 William Jardine: partner James Matheson, Jardine owned the company that was the largest importer of opium into China, thus supplying the catalyst for Architect of the First Opium War the war. Also, after amassing a large fortune from the opium business, Jardine used his wealth and influence to sway the opinion Benjamin Cassan of both the public and the government towards war. And finally, through meetings and correspondence with Lord Palmerston, Jardine masterminded the military strategy that would be used in a successful campaign against China. He even helped determine some istory often overlooks the first Opium War, which was fought H of the demands that were to be met by the Treaty of Nanking. from 1840-1842.1 Not only did this war mark a major transition in Despite this evidence, some historians maintain that Jardine's role in Chinese history, opening up the isolated empire to foreign markets, the war has been exaggerated. Perhaps this is because they believe but it is also gives insight into the foreign policy of the British the Opium War would have been fought in a similar manner without Empire during the nineteenth century. Most historians who have Jardine's influence, or simply because they overlooked the details of written on the subject, however, focus largely on the controversy his involvement. Whatever the reasons, a close examination of surrounding the opium trade, instead of on the war itself. Some have William Jardine's actions leading up to the first British-Chinese even labeled the British Empire of this period as drug pushers, and Opium War shows that not only has his role been far from blame them for the opium addiction of millions of Chinese.
    [Show full text]
  • China As “Victim”? the Opium War That Wasn’T by Harry G
    Center for European Studies Working Paper Series #136 China as “Victim”? The Opium War That Wasn’t by Harry G. Gelber Visiting Scholar, Center for European Studies Harvard University [email protected] 1/601 Sandy Bay Road Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7005, Australia Abstract The 1840-42 Anglo-Chinese war (the so-called “Opium War”) is almost universally believed to have been triggered by British imperial rapacity and determination to sell more and more opium into China. That belief is mistaken. The British went to war because of Chinese military threats to defenseless British civilians, including women and children; because China refused to negotiate on terms of diplomatic equality and because China refused to open more ports than Canton to trade, not just with Britain but with everybody. The belief about British “guilt” came later, as part of China’s long catalogue of alleged Western “exploitation and aggression.” China’s rise in recent years has attracted intense international attention. There are many reasons. One is the ancient idea that because China has a very large popu- lation, huge territory, a fascinating record in art and literature, and a long history of East Asian dominance, it is necessarily destined to be a great modern global power. In addition, there is China’s large and growing importance in international trade and finance. There is the evident energy and dynamism of China’s people. But together with these comes a widespread conviction that China has been unfairly oppressed and ex- ploited by the West, in ways that merit redress. The origins of this notion go back to the nineteenth century, and the long decline and collapse of the last imperial dynasty, the Qing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Root of the Opium War: Mismanagement in the Aftermath of the British East India Company's Loss of Its Monopoly in 1834
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Honors Program in History (Senior Honors Theses) Department of History 5-2-2008 The Root of the Opium War: Mismanagement in the Aftermath of the British East India Company's Loss of its Monopoly in 1834 Jason A. Karsh University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hist_honors Part of the History Commons Karsh, Jason A., "The Root of the Opium War: Mismanagement in the Aftermath of the British East India Company's Loss of its Monopoly in 1834" (2008). Honors Program in History (Senior Honors Theses). 13. https://repository.upenn.edu/hist_honors/13 A Senior Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Honors in History. Faculty Advisors: Siyen Fei and Lynn Hollen Lees This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hist_honors/13 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Root of the Opium War: Mismanagement in the Aftermath of the British East India Company's Loss of its Monopoly in 1834 Abstract The histories of the Opium War, of which there are many, have posited that the roots of the conflict are diverse and interconnected, ranging from cultural differences to conflicting perspectives on trade. Many historians even imply that the Opium War was somehow inevitable. They point to the famous Macartney Mission of 1793, in which the first British diplomat ot meet the Chinese emperor refused to kowtow and was subsequently denied formal diplomatic relations with the Chinese. However, in investigating documents of the British East India Company at Canton some years later, the war in no way seemed predestined.
    [Show full text]
  • Palmerston, Parliament and Peking: the Melbourne Ministry and the Opium Crisis, 1835-1840
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1994 Palmerston, Parliament and Peking: The Melbourne Ministry and the Opium Crisis, 1835-1840. Glenn Paul Melancon Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Melancon, Glenn Paul, "Palmerston, Parliament and Peking: The eM lbourne Ministry and the Opium Crisis, 1835-1840." (1994). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 5891. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/5891 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from aity type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and in ^ op er alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized coftyright material had to be removed, a note win indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Opium War in 1842
    Opium clipper “Water Witch”(1831) National Maritime Museum, London [1831_WaterWitch_PW7719_nmm] THE OPIUM TRADE Introduction The Opium Wars of 1839 to 1842 and 1856 to 1860 marked a new stage in China’s relations with the West. China’s military defeats in these wars forced its rulers to sign treaties opening many ports to foreign trade. The restrictions imposed under the Canton system were abolished. Opium, despite imperial prohibitions, now became a regular item of trade. As opium flooded into China, its price dropped, local consumption increased rapidly, and the drug penetrated all levels of society. In the new treaty ports, foreign traders collaborated with a greater variety of Chinese merchants than under the Canton system, and they ventured deeply into the Chinese interior. Missionaries brought Christian teachings to villagers, protected by the diplomatic rights obtained under the treaties. Popular hostility to the new foreigners began to rise. Not surprisingly, Chinese historians have regarded the two Opium Wars as unjust impositions of foreign power on the weakened Qing empire. In the 20th century, the Republic of China made strenuous efforts to abolish what it called “unequal treaties.” It succeeded in removing most of them in World War II, but this phase of foreign imperialism only ended completely with the reversion of Hong Kong to China in 1997. Conventional textbooks even date the beginning of modern Chinese history from the end of the first Opium War in 1842. 1 Although the wars, opium trade, and treaties did reflect superior Western military force, focusing only on Western impositions on China gives us too narrow a picture of this period.
    [Show full text]
  • Through the Valley of Death 95 Through the Valley Of
    through the valley of death 95 CHAPTER TWO ThrougH the VAllEy Of Death The First Opium War and its Aftermath One might be tempted to suggest that the death of Zheng’s mother in 1840 was an omen for the passing of the old order and the catastrophic changes that were soon to engulf China, for 1840 was also the year in which the first Opium War erupted in guangzhou.1 Trouble had been brewing for some time, as many officials were deeply troubled by increasing addiction to opium and the economic disruption caused by the outflow of silver to England used to pay for the drug, and on the tenth of the intercalary fourth month (June 2) of 1838, Huang Juezi 黃爵滋 (1793-1853) submitted a me- morial to the government recommending drastic measures to stop the importation of opium. Eight days later lin Zexu 林則徐 (1785-1850), who had already distinguished himself as a provincial official, submitted an- other memorial supporting Huang and laying out concrete proposals about how to deal with the problem.2 The Daoguang 道光 emperor (reg. 1821- 1851) summoned lin to the capital late in 1838, and then after nineteen audiences with him, appointed him Imperial Commissioner with plenipo- tentiary powers to deal with the opium question in guangzhou. lin arrived in that city on the twenty-fifth of the first month (March 10) 1839, and soon leading Chinese merchants involved in the opium trade were appearing before him in chains. When the British representative, Captain Charles Elliot (1801-1875), arrived in guangzhou from Macao ( Aomen 澳門) fourteen days later, much of the city was blockaded, and 1 A still useful account of the first Opium War in English is Peter Ward fay, The Opium War 1840-1842, Chapel Hill: university of North Carolina Press, 1975.
    [Show full text]
  • From Silver to Opium: a Study of the Evolution and Impact of the British-Chinese Trade System from 1780 to 1842
    Undergraduate Library Research Awards ULRA Awards From Silver to Opium: A Study of the Evolution and Impact of the British-Chinese Trade System from 1780 to 1842 Dominic V. Budetti Loyola Marymount University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ulra Recommended Citation Budetti, Dominic V., "From Silver to Opium: A Study of the Evolution and Impact of the British-Chinese Trade System from 1780 to 1842" (2016). Undergraduate Library Research Awards. 1. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ulra/awards/2016/1 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the William H. Hannon Library at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Library Research Awards by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. From Silver to Opium: A Study of the Evolution and Impact of the British-Chinese Trade System from 1780 to 1842 1 From Silver to Opium Beginning in the late eighteenth century, both the British Empire and the Chinese Qing Empire started to experience some drastic changes. While there were many factors that contributed to these changes, the newly forming trade relations between these two countries were arguably the most influential. The largest impact of this trade resulted from the introduction of opium, which transformed the structure of trade between Britain and China and replaced silver as the medium of trade. The shift from silver to opium as the primary trade medium in the British- Chinese trade system had social and economic impacts on the British and Chinese Empires that would eventually cripple China and leave it vulnerable to European imperialism.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sketch of the Eliot Family
    Be 35 [y*J »S ffl s t^ e^ 1 in \t*7 m n,' HI — = i r» w = Jk = tfir (A (/) 111 O> = C O is *!= — 8 Q s— U. I 0 > 00­00- <a. a: a <D = v X **E |3* **E **E •*E !•— *¦* E= )l> { J t \ (. I < t/7 «/ 1 .' "Uip*!"1^ ( f r J (¦ 4! [ < es. Quarterly 1st and 4th: Argent, a fees gules between double cottises, wavy azure, for Eliot. 2d and 3d: Argent, a chevron gules between 3 castles embattled, sable, for Sigdon. CREST: An elephant's head, couped. MOTTO: Praecedentibus in star. See " TheGovernor/' by Sir Thos. Elyot,pre­ sented to Sir Oliver Cromwell, now in library of British Museum. d Mss 5639 f»l 451 ||lns' ?..r«Sc Vol.8.K l r S / •'- » «P oo 2 i •« ARMS.—Anciently.—Azure, in bend aba­ ton, or, CBEST: A hand couped at the wrist in armor holding a cutlass in bend. m MOTTO: Fortiter et recte. Playfair, Vol.IE. 79868 7 98 63 i8i*JOSEPH S. &.^ £ D. iX CD HON. ANDREW 8 EDITH JUDITH MARIE SiifS&l&M JOHN GRACE GRACE 183 JAMES HENRY 17. is. 10^7. Bap. t3. •. i6.w. Bap. 31. ja (?) 1641. WILLIAM fcap. 2. 1603. Final and corrected chart Mar. Emma of the male members of the 1GNES ELIZABETH KATHARINE WILLIAM HENRY WILLIAM HENRY WILLIAM JOHN MARGARET ELIOT FAMILY, of DevonhDevonshirei . ClCornwal l l and SSomerset, England, mid descendants in F. S. of Andrew Eliot, Sr.,of Sketcli of the imprweion of Andrew Bliot*g Beverly, Mass., (1) soul.
    [Show full text]