DOCSLIB.ORG

School Transportation Technician Annual Inspection Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
School Transportation Technician Annual Inspection Guide Annual Inspection & Maintenance Resource Guide 2019 SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION UNIT 201 East Colfax Avenue, Room 209, Denver, CO 80203 303-866-6655/303-866-6656 http://www.cde.state.co.us/transportation Intentionally left blank Page 2 of 54 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................. 5 Vehicle Inspection Program ................................................................................ 7 Annual Inspection Requirements .......................................................................... 9 PM Brake Inspection and Documentation Requirements .............................................. 11 Brake inspector Requirements ............................................................................ 12 Certification ................................................................................................ 13 Introduction to the Hands-On Performance Test ...................................................... 19 Records, Documentation, and Retention............................................................... 39 Forms ......................................................................................................... 43 STU-13 CDE Annual Inspector Test Answer Sheet ..................................................... 43 STU-19 Hands-On Test check list ........................................................................ 43 STU-20 Application for Annual Inspector Qualification or Recertification ........................ 44 STU-22 Application for Inspecting Site Certification ................................................. 44 STU-24 CDE Brake Inspector's Qualification Certificate .............................................. 45 STU-25 Affidavit of Annual Inspection .................................................................. 45 STU-26 CDE Annual Inspection/Preventive Maintenance Checklist ................................. 46 STU-27 Trailer Annual Inspection/Preventive Maintenance Checklist ............................. 46 STU-30 Hands-On Tester Qualification Recertification ............................................... 49 Section A. Road Test inspection ........................................................................ A-2 Chart A-1. Steering Wheel Play (Lash) Measurements Chart ....................................... A-4 Chart A-2. FMVSS.111 Mirror Adjustment ........................................................... A-12 Chart A-3. FORD Warning Lights / Buzzer ........................................................... A-23 Chart A-4. NAVISTAR Brake Failure Warning System Checks ..................................... A-24 Chart A-5. Ford Normal Brake System Conditions .................................................. A-25 Section B. Under Hood Inspection ...................................................................... B-2 Chart B-1. Belt Inspection ............................................................................. B-13 Chart B-2. Pulley Inspection .......................................................................... B-14 Chart B-3. Checking Belt Tension .................................................................... B-16 Section C. Interior Inspection ........................................................................... C-2 Chart C-1. First Aid Kit ................................................................................... C-7 Chart C-2. Body Fluid Cleanup Kit ..................................................................... C-8 Section D. Under Vehicle Inspection ................................................................... D-2 Chart D-1. Tightening Steering Column Joint Bolts .................................................. D-3 Page 3 of 54 Chart D-2. Steering Joints ............................................................................. D-12 Section E. Around Vehicle ............................................................................... E-2 Chart E-1. Service Door, Stop Arm, Amber and Red Warning Lights ............................. E-14 Chart E-2. Measuring Push Rod Travel ................................................................ E-18 Chart E-3. Air Brake Adjustment Chart ............................................................... E-19 Chart E-4. Tire Wear .................................................................................... E-21 Section T: Trailer Inspection ............................................................................ T-2 Appendix A. Regulation 1 CCR 301-26 (2018) Rules for the Operation, Maintenance, and Inspection of School Transportation Vehicles Effective date Jan 01, 2018 .......... A-1 Appendix B. Regulation 1 CCR 301-25 (2015) Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Vehicles Effective date April 30, 2015 .................................. B-1 Appendix C. Regulation 1 CCR 301-25 (2007) Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Vehicles Effective date September 01, 2007 .................................. C-1 Appendix D. Regulation 1 CCR 301-25 (1998) Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Vehicles Effective date February 01, 1999 .................................. D-1 Appendix E. Regulation 1 CCR 301-25 (1993) Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Vehicles Effective date October 01, 1993 .................................. E-1 Appendix F. Colorado Racking Load Test.............................................................. F-1 Appendix G. Glossary .................................................................................... G-1 Appendix H. Additional Resources ..................................................................... H-1 Page 4 of 54 Introduction The Colorado Department of Education (CDE) School Transportation Unit has promulgated this resource guide to assist public school districts, charter schools, as well as Boards of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES) with developing policies and procedures for the safe transportation of students. These guidelines provide manufacturer recommendations, industry standards and best practices which are consistent with the Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Vehicles, 1 CCR 301-25 and the Colorado Rules for the Operation, Maintenance and Inspection of School Transportation Vehicles 1 CCR 301-26. This publication is intended to serve as a transportation provider resource toward compliance with legislation and regulations. Acknowledgements Colorado Department of Education School Transportation Unit Jennifer Okes Chief Operating Officer School Finance Division [email protected] Fred Stewart Transportation Analyst [email protected] Colorado State Pupil Transportation Association (CSPTA) Fleet Service Committee Special thanks to Brian P. Vasina, Academy 20 School District and Amanda Crissup Boulder Valley School District Transportation http://www.cde.state.co.us/transportation Page 5 of 54 Intentionally left blank Page 6 of 54 Colorado Department of Education School Finance and Operations Division Transportation Unit Vehicle Inspection Program This program is established to ensure reasonable and adequate standards of safety and inspection of vehicles used to provide transportation and support student programs. The CDE Transportation Unit shall be responsible for administering and monitoring this inspection program to ensure compliance. This guide is structured to provide the information, form instruction, and criteria for operating a comprehensive Vehicle Inspection Program. Along with program requirements, this guide contains information for record keeping, forms for reporting and recording the inspections, and procedures for inspecting the various vehicle components/systems. This guide should clarify many of the gray areas that occur when operating a Vehicle Inspection Program. However, this guide will not answer all technical or interpretive questions nor will it eliminate the need for trained personnel to exercise professional judgment when performing vehicle inspections. The emphasis of ALL vehicle inspections is "SAFETY" and in every case, the districts, charter schools, certified outside inspection sites, and inspectors must exercise judgment to ensure the greatest degree of safety for vehicle operators, passengers, and other motorists. Resources used in the preparation of this guide are as follows: • 1 CCR 301-25 Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Vehicles http://www.cde.state.co.us/transportation/1ccr15 • National Standards for School Buses and Operations http://www.nasdpts.org/ncstonline/Documents/NCST%202015%20Specifications %20and%20Procedures%2011.1.16.pdf • Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2011-title49-vol6/pdf/CFR-2011-title49- vol6-part571.pdf • Service and Repair Manuals from various school bus body and chassis manufacturers' • Other Industry Standards for Maintenance and Repair Procedures Page 7 of 54 State Statute: Colorado law provides for the State Board of Education to adopt and enforce regulations governing the safe operation of school buses used for the transportation of students pursuant to Sections 22-51-107, 22-51-108 and 42-4- 1904 C.R.S. Inspection and Preventive maintenance requirements can be found in the following two documents: • 1 CCR 301-25 Colorado Minimum Standards Governing School Transportation Vehicles http://www.cde.state.co.us/transportation/1ccr15 • 1 CCR 301-26 Colorado Rules for the Operation, Maintenance and Inspection
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vehicle List and Driver Assignments
    Effingham County Board of Education Vehicle List 6/30/2013 Vehicle List and Driver Assignments Insurance Veh# Make Year Model Cost Assigned Driver/Location Tag # Vin # Car# Book Value 940 L0163292 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15915 1HVBBACNXSH623821 151 - 941 L016393 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15916 1HVBBACN1SH623822 153 - 942 L016394 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 BB 66 15917 1HVBBACN3SH623823 152 - 944 L016396 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15918 1HVBBACN7SH623825 155 - 945 L016397 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15919 1HVBBACN9SH623826 156 - 946 L016398 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15920 1HVBBACNOSH623827 158 - 947 L016399 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15921 1HVBBACN2SH623828 157 - 951 L020327 1995 95 FORD 41,995.62 BB 66 15923 1FDXB80C1SVA75535 165 - 952 L020328 1995 95 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15924 1FDXB80C3SVA75536 164 - 953 L020329 1995 95 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15925 1FDXB80C5SVA75537 168 - 954 L020330 1995 95 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15926 1FDXB80CXSVA79843 169 - 956 L020332 1995 95 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15928 1FDXB80C8SVA76228 166 - 962 L024118 1996 96 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15963 1FDXB80C5VVA03628 176 - 963 L024119 1996 96 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15964 1FDXB80C7VVA03629 175 - 964 L024117 1996 96 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 54 15965 1FDXB80C3VVA03627 177 - 965 L024116 1996 96 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 54 15966 1FDXB80C1VVA03626 178 - 970 L028102 1997 97 INT 44,597.30 Spare BB 66 16029 1HVBBABN8VH496962 181 - 971 L028103 1997 97 INT 44,597.30 Spare BB 66 16048 1HVBBABNXVH496963 182 - 973 L028105
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2021 Electric Truck & Bus Update, Part 2
    2021 Electric Truck & Bus Update, Part 2: Buses By John Benson September 2021 1. Introduction This is Part 2 and focuses on buses. Battery-electric buses are being deployed more rapidly that medium and heavy battery-electric trucks, mainly because of federal and state incentives. A major consideration, especially for electric utility professionals, is that battery-electric buses take a huge amount of energy to charge them. Also many of these vehicles will perform depot recharging en masse. This will be mostly overnight in transit depots. These facilities are currently not prepared for the massive load increase as their vehicles transition to electric operation. The flowing is a description of and link to part 1 of this series: https://energycentral.com/c/ec/2021-electric-truck-bus-update-part-1-trucks The following was the last paper on this subject, which was posted in January. Electric Refuse Trucks & Battery-Electric Buses: This post is a review of both of these two-vehicle types and considerations as they electrify. https://energycentral.com/c/cp/electric-refuse-trucks-battery-electric-buses Section 2 of this report will describe all major manufacturers of buses, their offerings and any new developments by those firms. Section 3 will describe how fleet managers can evaluate and remedy the overload risk described above. 2. Buses A few of the big players in the large-to-medium truck market are also players in the bus market – see the first two below, for instance (see part 1 of this series for truck models for these two manufacturers). Also the third firm below is not only the largest player in the bus market, and a technology leader, but is starting to spin their technologies off into other markets, including trucks 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • IC Bus Charging Fundamentals
    September 16, 2020 Introduction by Central Coast Clean Cities Coalition Grant Updates Santa Barbara County APCD SLO County APCD Central Coast Community Energy Update Electric School Bus Presentations The Lion Electric Company A-Z Bus Sales BusWest Creative Bus Sales Q&A Session • C5 is a group of local stakeholders whose mission is to expand the use of alternative fuel vehicles and fueling infrastructure in Santa Barbara and SLO Counties • Part of National Clean Cities Program • C-5.org Alternative & Renewable Fuels Fuel Economy Vehicle Trip • Biodiesel • Fuel efficient vehicles Elimination • Driving habits • Electricity • Telecommuting • Vehicle maintenance • Ridesharing • Ethanol (E85) • Biking • Hydrogen Idle Reduction • Walking • Natural gas • Technologies • Behavioral changes • Propane Alex Economou Coordinator Central Coast Clean Cities Coalition (C5) (805) 961-8894 [email protected] ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/auctionproceeds/lowincomemapfull.htm https://www.ourair.org/clean-air-grants-for-buses/ Application Internal Grant Offer Signed Internal Grant Submission Review (if eligible) Offer Review Execution After Grant Execution: Bus Post Bus Reimburse Annual Delivery Purchase Inspection Salvage ment Reports SCHOOL BUS INCENTIVES The SLO County APCD School Bus Incentive Program provides funding for replacement or retrofit of public school buses County-wide public school bus fleet numbers more than 200 Since 2001, SLO County APCD has administered $5.9 million in grants for local school districts – including 75 retrofits, 43 replacements, 3 repowers NEW E-BUS = $400K + FUNDING: APPROX. $200K FROM SLO APCD SLO COUNTY APCD AVAILABLE FUNDS AB 617 CAP Incentive funding available for projects in low- income communities; amount TBD; application period is October – November.
    [Show full text]
  • BENDIX EFFORTS SUPPORT MAKING SCHOOL BUSES EVEN SAFER National School Bus Safety Week Puts Spotlight on the Safest Form of Student Transportation
    News Release For further information, please contact: Barbara Gould or Ken Kesegich Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC Marcus Thomas LLC (440) 329-9609 (888) 482-4455 [email protected] [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE BENDIX EFFORTS SUPPORT MAKING SCHOOL BUSES EVEN SAFER National School Bus Safety Week Puts Spotlight on the Safest Form of Student Transportation ELYRIA, Ohio – Oct. 22, 2019 – The National Association for Pupil Transportation (NAPT) has its eyes on a school year free of student transportation fatalities – and advanced vehicle safety technologies are a key to reaching that goal. Bendix (Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC and Bendix Spicer Foundation Brake LLC) is proud to work with school districts and vehicle manufacturers across North America in pursuit of safer student transportation as NAPT marks National School Bus Safety Week Oct. 21-25. The theme of this year’s National School Bus Safety Week is “My School Bus – The Safest Form of Student Transportation.” The theme reflects National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) data showing that the classic yellow school bus is 70 times safer than walking, bicycling, or riding in a passenger car or light truck to and from school. “Even so, a single school bus collision is one too many,” said TJ Thomas, director of marketing and customer solutions – Controls, at Bendix, the North American leader in the development and manufacture of intelligent, integrated active safety, air management, and braking solutions for commercial vehicles. “Bendix and all its industry partners are working tirelessly to help keep student passengers safe, and to support the school bus drivers who oversee their daily travels.” -more- BENDIX EFFORTS SUPPORT MAKING SCHOOL BUSES EVEN SAFER Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Proposition Date: February 3, 2016 Cc: Board of Education, Mark Premo
    INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: DR. JIM HOFFMAN, SUPERINTENDENT FROM: MICHAEL OUIMET, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT FOR BUSINESS SUBJECT: BUS REPLACEMENT PLAN/BUS PROPOSITION DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 2016 CC: BOARD OF EDUCATION, MARK PREMO I am recommending the district seek voter approval on May 17, 2016, to spend $749,044 to purchase eight (8) new transportation vehicles in alignment with the District’s bus replacement schedule. This schedule of bus replacements was recommended in the district’s transportation study completed in the Fall of 2010 by Transportation Advisory Services (TAS). Please see attached, the “Fleet” section of this report for your reference. The School Bus Proposition breaks down as follows: • $673,590: purchase of six, 65-passenger school buses @ $112,265 per bus • $100,254: for the purchase of two, 28-passenger school buses @ $50,127 per bus $773,844 ($24,800) Less: Trades of $24,800 for eight (8) buses. $749,044 Please see attached, the proposed specifications for the vehicles recommended to be purchased. TAS recommends a consistent replacement plan, requiring a bus purchase vote each year, because an annual replacement plan of the existing fleet helps the district to maintain student safety and control repair and maintenance costs on older buses. A well thought out bus replacement plan is more cost effective and enables the district to consolidate routes and adjust its fleet as needed year to year. The replacement plan will also support continuation of the District’s excellent safety record with the New York State Department of Transportation. Please find attached a current profile of the district’s bus fleet, including a projected replacement schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric School Buses Available for Purchase
    Electric School Buses Available for Purchase veic.org/electric-school-buses Type A Electric School Buses Manufacturer TransTech Lion Blue Bird Collins Body TransTech Lion MicroBird – Girardin Collins Chassis Ford E-450 Lion Ford E-450 Ford E-450 Ford eQVM approved Ford eQVM approved Powertrain TM4 / Dana Ecotuned Motiv All-Electric Powertrain Motiv All-Electric Powertrain FIAMM FIAMM Battery Manufacturer / Chemistry Lithium Ion NMC Lithium-ion Sodium Nickel Sodium Nickel Standard Battery Size / Capacity 106 kWh Up to 160 kWh 89 kWh 106 kWh (Optional Larger Batteries) Passenger Capacity Up to 24 passengers; 25 Up to 30 25 (Without Wheelchair Lift) wheelchair lift available Approximate Range Standard Battery Up to 100 miles Up to 150 miles Up to 100 miles Up to 100 miles (Optional Larger Battery) Top Speed 65 mph 65 mph 65 mph 65 mph Gradeability 17% Up to 20% 12%, likely steeper 17% Cabin Heating System All-Electric Heating Available Auxiliary Heater Available All Electric Webasto System All-Electric Heating Available J1772 208/240V Single Phase 208/240 V single phase power 19.2 J1772 208/240V Single Phase 15 Charge Systems Voltage and Power J1772 65A/240V 15 kW kW - requires 80 amps kW Vehicle-to-Grid Capability V2G Capable Optional: Bidirectional (V2G) Optional: Unidirectional flow (V1G) V2G Capable Clipper Creek (and other brands Compatible Charging Manufacturers Any brand using J1772 2x 6.6 kW Level 2 Any brand using J1772 using J1772) Estimated Charging Time 2.5 hours 2 - 4.5 hours 3.5 hours 2.5 hours (50%) Estimated Charging Time 8 hours 4-9 hours 7 hours 8 hours (0% to 100%) Approximate Price Local Dealers Provide Quote $265,000 - $335,000 Local Dealers Provide Quote Local Dealers Provide Quote Deployed in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Viability and Opportunities of School Bus Electrification in Massachusetts
    Clean Ride to School: Viability and Opportunities of School Bus Electrification in Massachusetts by Paola Massoli An Independent Research Capstone in the Field of Sustainability and the Environmental Management For the fulfillment of a Master’s in Liberal Arts at the Harvard University Extension School August 21, 2020 1 Abstract The iconic Yellow Bus system is the largest form of mass transit in the United States, comprising 480,000 buses that carry 25 million children to school every day. And it mostly runs on diesel. Due to the recognized toxicity of diesel exhaust, there have been substantial efforts to deploy cleaner forms of transportation for school children. Over the last 20 years, diesel engine retrofits have significantly reduced air pollutant emissions from heavy-duty vehicles, and alternative fuels such as liquified petroleum gas (LPG) promise to cut such emissions even further. However, none of these technologies eliminates air pollution or the greenhouse gases (GHG) that drive climate change, the greatest global environmental, economic and social threat of our times. Electric school buses offer a solution to address both climate and air quality concerns by eliminating tailpipe emissions, with the additional promise of long-term economic returns due to fuel savings and low maintenance costs. Electric school buses are being deployed at increasing pace, but they are still considered an emerging technology. This project seeks to validate the claims of lifetime cost competitiveness of electric school buses vis a vis the more conventional diesel and LPG vehicles. A total cost of ownership (TCO) model is created to assess under which conditions electric school buses are a favorable technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Parts Catalog
    FLEETRITE® PARTS CATALOG 2018 FLEETRITE PARTS THE RITE SOLUTION FOR YOU Fleetrite® is the first name recognized for trusted quality in aftermarket truck and bus parts. With over 45 years of strong performance in the industry Fleetrite® parts are OEM aftermarket quality approved and are backed by a one-year nationwide parts and labor warranty. High-quality parts at a competitive price. It’s the reason why it’s always the first recommended by more than 700 International® Truck dealers. So remember, the next time you’re in the market for aftermarket, always keep the top of the line, top of mind. Ask for THE ONE that keeps your Uptime FIRST in line. ASK FOR FLEETRITE® FIRST. FLEETRITE® FIRST TABLE OF CONTENTS ACCESSORIES......................................... 1 ENGINE OVERHAUL KITS .................. 83 BACK-UP ALARMS............................. 1 WATER & FUEL PUMPS ..................... 84 SHOP TOWELS ................................ 1 FUEL INJECTORS ............................ 86 JACKS............................................ 2 RADIOS.......................................... 2 ENGINE COOLING.................................... 87 ANTENNAS...................................... 3 RADIATORS.................................... 87 SURGE TANKS................................ 91 CAB...................................................... 4 FAN DRIVES .................................. 92 HVAC COMPRESSORS....................... 4 EXPANSION VALVES .......................... 8 EXHAUST ............................................. 97 BLOWER MOTORS...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Will Canada Miss the Bus?
    TRACKING THE ENERGY REVOLUTION 2019 Will Canada Miss the Bus? For a country that’s home to leading electric bus makers, Canada is slow to adopt them—it’s a missed opportunity in more ways than one March 2019 Contents 7 3 Missing the bus 4 A city comparison 7 Canadian e-buses 10 The global view 12 Dollars and good sense 14 Looking to the future 15 Endnotes 10 Will Canada Miss the Bus? All rights reserved. Permission is granted to reproduce all or part of this publication for non-commercial purposes, as long as the source is cited Tracking the Energy Revolution 2019 as “Clean Energy Canada.” Clean Energy Canada is a think tank at March 2019 | © 2019 Clean Energy Canada the Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue at Simon Fraser University. ISBN: 978-0-9950609-8-2 Front cover photo: Scott Webb | Back cover photo: Shutterstock 2 CLEAN ENERGY CANADA Missing the bus uses. They’re the veins of our cities, may find it more 7 difficult to keep transporting billions of people around their daily lives. Whether it’s a morning commute, prices low, making a lift home from school, or a trip to the local products less hockey game, buses have been a stalwart part internationally B of Canadian life for decades. appealing. But most Canadian buses also pollute. Yes, they’re better E-buses aren’t than cars because they move more people, but they are necessarily an nonetheless a sizable source of emissions. The good news is expensive option either. With battery prices falling 79% there’s a solution, and it’s a big opportunity for Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • School Bus Starters & Alternators
    School Bus Starters & Alternators SCHOOL BUSES PRESENT A UNIQUE SET OF CHALLENGES. A school bus performs the majority of its workday at slow speeds. At the same time, lighting and equipment associated with safety and passenger mobility add electrical loads that must be met at these same slow speeds. TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS THAT ADDRESS THE CHALLENGES Delco Remy high output alternators are specially designed to contend with the demanding electrical loads of school bus operating routines. Add to that the fuel savings opportunity, high 14.5 V temperature ratings and proven technologies like Remote Sense and you’ve got alternators in a class by themselves. 14.0 V Remote Sense Can Reduce Battery Charge Time by 50% The Delco Remy high output alternators are equipped with Remote With Remote Sense Sense which utilizes a second wire that reads the actual voltage at the battery. This signals the alternator to boost its output to compensate for the voltage drop, ensuring 14 volts at the battery. The proper voltage at the battery forces more current into the battery bringing the battery up to a full state of charge during the school bus runs between stops. 14.0 V Designed for Extreme Temperatures & Long Life No other school bus alternator on the market today can perform like the 13.5 V Delco Remy high output alternators. Both the 28SI and 40SI models withstand extreme underhood temperature demands of up to 257°F – that’s over 25°F above the competition – and still Without Remote Sense keep running. High-Efficiency Alternators Equals 20% Fuel Savings An Operating data was collected on school bus applications in order efficient alternator on a school bus can more than pay for itself in to identify what was actually occurring over the course of the less than one year.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 35
    Transportation Energy Data Book Quick Facts Petroleum In 2015 the U.S. produced almost 13 million barrels of petroleum per day (mmbd), or almost 14% of the world’s 93.4 mmbd. The U.S. consumed 19.1 mmbd, or 21% of the world’s 92.5 mmbd in 2014. U.S. transportation petroleum use was 70% of total U.S. petroleum use in 2015. In 2015 U.S. transportation petroleum use was 107% of total U.S. petroleum production. Petroleum comprised 92% of U.S. transportation energy use in 2015. Cars and light trucks accounted for 64% of U.S. transportation petroleum use in 2014. Medium trucks (Class 3‐6) accounted for 4% of U.S. transportation petroleum use in 2014. Heavy trucks (Class 7‐8) and buses accounted for 19% of U.S. transportation petroleum use in 2014. Nonhighway modes accounted for the rest of U.S. transportation petroleum use in 2014 (12%). Energy In 2015 U.S. transportation energy use accounted for over 28% of total U.S. energy use. Cars and light trucks accounted for 59% of U.S. transportation energy use in 2014. Medium trucks accounted for 5% of U.S. transportation energy use in 2014. Heavy trucks accounted for 18% of U.S. transportation energy use in 2014. Light Vehicle Characteristics In 2014 there were 114 million cars and 125 million light trucks in the U.S. (239 million total light vehicles). U.S. cars: o 7,525,000 cars were sold in 2015. o In 2015 the average age of a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Procurement Act of 1992 6 21
    APPENDIX A STANDARD CLAUSES FOR NEW YORK STATE CONTRACTS PLEASE RETAIN THIS DOCUMENT FOR FUTURE REFERENCE. October 2019 STANDARD CLAUSES FOR NYS CONTRACTS APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Executory Clause 3 2. Non-Assignment Clause 3 3. Comptroller’s Approval 3 4. Workers’ Compensation Benefits 3 5. Non-Discrimination Requirements 3 6. Wage and Hours Provisions 3-4 7. Non-Collusive Bidding Certification 4 8. International Boycott Prohibition 4 9. Set-Off Rights 4 10. Records 4 11. Identifying Information and Privacy Notification 4 12. Equal Employment Opportunities For Minorities and Women 4-5 13. Conflicting Terms 5 14. Governing Law 5 15. Late Payment 5 16. No Arbitration 5 17. Service of Process 5 18. Prohibition on Purchase of Tropical Hardwoods 5-6 19. MacBride Fair Employment Principles 6 20. Omnibus Procurement Act of 1992 6 21. Reciprocity and Sanctions Provisions 6 22. Compliance with Breach Notification and Data Security Laws 6 23. Compliance with Consultant Disclosure Law 6 24. Procurement Lobbying 7 25. Certification of Registration to Collect Sales and Compensating Use Tax by Certain 7 State Contractors, Affiliates and Subcontractors 26. Iran Divestment Act 7 27. Admissibility of Contract 7 Page 2 October 2019 STANDARD CLAUSES FOR NYS CONTRACTS APPENDIX A STANDARD CLAUSES FOR NYS CONTRACTS Contractor shall provide and maintain coverage during the life of this contract for the benefit of such employees as are required The parties to the attached contract, license, lease, amendment to be covered by the provisions of the Workers' Compensation or other agreement of any kind (hereinafter, "the contract" or Law.
    [Show full text]