DOCSLIB.ORG

Drug Endangered Children Awareness Training

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Drug Endangered Children Awareness Training NDAA DRUG-ENDANGERED CHILDREN COMPILATION (Last updated March 2011) TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................................................................1 ALABAMA .....................................................................................................................................................8 ALA. CODE § 26-15-3.2 (2011). CHEMICAL ENDANGERMENT OF EXPOSING A CHILD TO AN ENVIRONMENT IN WHICH CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ARE PRODUCED OR DISTRIBUTED. .....................................................8 ALASKA .........................................................................................................................................................9 ALASKA STAT. § 11.51.110 (2011). ENDANGERING THE WELFARE OF A CHILD IN THE SECOND DEGREE.....9 ALASKA STAT. § 11.71.040 (2011). MISCONDUCT INVOLVING A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE IN THE FOURTH DEGREE. .......................................................................................................................................................9 ALASKA STAT. § 12.55.125 (2011). SENTENCES OF IMPRISONMENT FOR FELONIES...................................11 ARIZONA .....................................................................................................................................................18 ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 13-3620 (2011). DUTY TO REPORT ABUSE, PHYSICAL INJURY, NEGLECT AND DENIAL OR DEPRIVATION OF MEDICAL OR SURGICAL CARE OR NOURISHMENT OF MINORS; MEDICAL RECORDS; EXCEPTION; VIOLATION; CLASSIFICATION; DEFINITIONS. ...........................................................................18 ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 13-3623 (2011). CHILD OR VULNERABLE ADULT ABUSE; EMOTIONAL ABUSE; CLASSIFICATION; EXCEPTIONS; DEFINITIONS..............................................................................................22 ARKANSAS..................................................................................................................................................24 ARK. CODE ANN. § 5-27-230 (2011). EXPOSURE OF CHILD TO A CHEMICAL SUBSTANCE OR METHAMPHETAMINE. .................................................................................................................................24 ARK. CODE ANN. § 5-64-406 (2011). DISTRIBUTION TO MINORS -- ENHANCED PENALTIES......................25 CALIFORNIA ..............................................................................................................................................25 CAL. PENAL CODE § 273A (2011). WILLFUL HARM OR INJURY TO CHILD; ENDANGERING PERSON OR HEALTH; PUNISHMENT; CONDITIONS OF PROBATION. .................................................................................25 CAL. PENAL CODE § 11165.13 (2011). MATERNAL SUBSTANCE ABUSE; POSITIVE TOXICOLOGY SCREEN AT TIME OF DELIVERY; BASIS FOR REPORTING CHILD ABUSE OR NEGLECT; ASSESSMENT OF NEEDS ................26 CAL. PENAL CODE § 12022.95 (2011). WILLFUL HARM OR INJURY RESULTING IN DEATH OF CHILD; SENTENCE ENHANCEMENT; PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS.........................................................................26 CAL. PENAL CODE § 13879.80 (2011). WRITTEN POLICIES FOR RESPONSE TO NARCOTICS CRIME SCENES WHERE CHILD LIVES; ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION; CHILDREN’S BEST INTERESTS. ...........................27 CAL. PENAL CODE § 13879.81 (2011). MULTIJURISDICTIONAL GROUPS TO ADDRESS WELFARE OF CHILDREN ENDANGERED BY PARENTAL DRUG USE; STANDARDS AND PROTOCOLS [CIVIL] .......................27 CAL HEALTH & SAFETY CODE § 11379.7 (2011). CONVICTIONS FOR SPECIFIED VIOLATIONS INVOLVING METHAMPHETAMINE OR PHENCYCLIDINE; STRUCTURES WHERE UNDERAGE CHILD PRESENT; GREAT BODILY INJURY SUFFERED BY UNDERAGE CHILD; ADDITIONAL PUNISHMENT .........................................................28 CAL HEALTH & SAFETY CODE § 123605 (2011). ASSESSMENT OF NEEDS; PROTOCOL; USE; PURPOSE ......28 COLORADO ................................................................................................................................................29 COLO. REV. STAT. § 13-21-804 (2011). DAMAGES—PERSONS INJURED BY AN INDIVIDUAL ILLEGAL DRUG USER [CIVIL] ..............................................................................................................................................29 1 National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse National District Attorneys Association COLO. REV. STAT. § 18-6-401 (2011). CHILD ABUSE. ...............................................................................30 COLO. REV. STAT. § 18-18-405 (2011). UNLAWFUL DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURING, DISPENSING, SALE, OR POSSESSION ...........................................................................................................................................34 COLO. REV. STAT. § 19-1-103 (2011). DEFINITIONS..................................................................................38 COLO. REV. STAT. § 19-3-401 (2011). TAKING CHILDREN INTO CUSTODY. ...............................................57 COLO. REV. STAT. § 22-32-110.7 (2011). BOARD OF EDUCATION—SPECIFIC POWERS—DRUG TESTING [CIVIL] .......................................................................................................................................................60 CONNECTICUT..........................................................................................................................................60 CONN. GEN. STAT. § 17A-101 (2011). PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM ABUSE. MANDATED REPORTERS. EDUCATIONAL AND TRAINING PROGRAMS [CIVIL].....................................................................................60 CONN. GEN. STAT. § 17A-101J (2011). NOTIFICATION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND PROSECUTORIAL AUTHORITIES WHEN REASONABLE BELIEF OF SEXUAL ABUSE OR SERIOUS PHYSICAL ABUSE. NOTIFICATION OF AGENCY RESPONSIBLE FOR LICENSURE OF INSTITUTION OR FACILITY WHERE ABUSE OR NEGLECT HAS OCCURRED. REFERRAL OF PARENT [CIVIL] ................................................................................................61 CONN. GEN. STAT. § 17A-101N (2011). COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA RE PERCENTAGE OF ABUSE AND NEGLECT CASES INVOLVING SUBSTANCE ABUSE. REDUCTION STRATEGIES [CIVIL] ...........................62 CONN. GEN. STAT. § 17A-710 (2011). (FORMERLY SEC. 19A-4F). SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PROGRAMS FOR PREGNANT WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN. REPORTS [CIVIL] ...........................................62 CONN. GEN. STAT. § 53-21 (2011). INJURY OR RISK OF INJURY TO, OR IMPAIRING MORALS OF, CHILDREN. SALE OF CHILDREN.....................................................................................................................................63 DELAWARE ................................................................................................................................................64 DEL. CODE ANN. TIT. 11, § 1102 (2011). ENDANGERING THE WELFARE OF A CHILD; CLASS E OR G FELONY. .....................................................................................................................................................64 DEL. CODE ANN. TIT. 16, § 923 (2011). CHILD PROTECTION LEVELS........................................................65 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.......................................................................................................................67 D.C. CODE § 4-1301.06 (2011). INVESTIGATION [FORMERLY § 6-2104]. ..................................................67 D.C. CODE § 4-1321.02 (2011). PERSONS REQUIRED TO MAKE REPORTS; PROCEDURE [FORMERLY § 2- 1352]..........................................................................................................................................................68 D.C. CODE § 16-2301 (2011). DEFINITIONS...............................................................................................70 FLORIDA .....................................................................................................................................................78 FLA. STAT. ANN. § 39.01 (2011). DEFINITIONS..........................................................................................78 FLA. STAT. ANN. § 39.806 (2011). GROUNDS FOR TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS [CIVIL]...............92 GEORGIA.....................................................................................................................................................95 GA. CODE ANN. § 15-11-55 (2011). DISPOSITION OF DEPRIVED CHILD ....................................................95 GA. CODE ANN. § 16-5-73 (2011). PROHIBITION AGAINST PRESENCE OF CHILDREN DURING MANUFACTURE OF METHAMPHETAMINE; PUNISHMENT. DEFINITIONS .......................................................98 GA. CODE ANN. § 40-6-391 (2011). DRIVERS WITH ABILITY IMPAIRED BY ALCOHOL, DRUGS, OR TOXIC VAPOR ........................................................................................................................................................99 HAWAII......................................................................................................................................................106 HAW. REV. STAT. ANN. § 350-1 (2011). DEFINITIONS.............................................................................106 HAW. REV. STAT. ANN. § 587-89 (2010). DRUG-AFFECTED INFANTS; TREATMENT; FAMILY REFERRAL; FEDERAL GRANTS. [REPEALED EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 1, 2010.] ............................................................107 HAW. REV. STAT. ANN. § 709-903.5 (2011). ENDANGERING THE WELFARE OF A MINOR IN THE FIRST DEGREE.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Review on the Current Classification and Regulatory Provisions for Medicines in Drug & Cosmetic Act, in the Light of Present Day Context
    Section Pharmaindustry Commentary A Review on the Current Classification and Regulatory Provisions for Medicines in Drug & Cosmetic Act, in the light of Present Day Context Prashant Tandon1, Varun Gupta2, Ashish Ranjan3, Purav Gandhi4, Anand Kotiyal5, 3 Aastha Kapoor 3 1Founder ;2VP & Head Medical Affair; Manager Medical Affair; 5Drug Data Analyst Medical Affair, 1mg Technologies Private Limited, 4th Floor, Motorola Building, MG Road, Sector 14, Gurugram, Haryana, 122001. 4Founder, Remedy Social, C/602, Tulip Citadel, Shreyas Tekra, Ambawadi, Ahmedabad 380015, Gujarat. ABSTRACT______________________________________________________________ Background: Current classification of medicines in Conclusions: We have recommended a revised drug India under Drug and Cosmetic Act into Schedule G, classification system that is more comprehensive in coverage and H, H1, X is outdated, evolved through patchwork over eliminates the overlaps between classes. Moreover, considering the years and needs to be thoroughly updated. The the implementation challenges for such a drug classification primary aim of the scheduling system is to ensure system in the diverse and fragmented ecosystem in India, we appropriate access to medicines while balancing recommend a technology backed platform to help monitor the public health and safety. India is experiencing a rapid implementation. transition with the rising burden of chronic non- communicable diseases where regular access of Key words: Drug Classification System, Drug and Cosmetic Act affordable medicines is critical for chronic disease India, Digitization of Prescriptions, Drug Schedules in India, management to prevent complications. Methods: We Schedule H, Monitoring Drug Schedule System analyzed drugs commonly selling across India, Received: 01.09.17 | Accepted:16.09.17 through multiple information sources including 1mg drug database, PharmaTrac (AIOCD-AWACS), Corresponding Author inventory data from distributors and retailers, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 10 OSHA Violations for 2016
    TOP 10 VIOLATIONSSHA for 2016 NOTICE FINAL OSHA E V E N TS SPECIAL REPORT Top 10 OSHA Violations for 2016 i Vice President, Content and Product Development: Patricia Trainor, JD Founder: Robert L. Brady, JD Senior Managing Editor, Environment, Health, and Safety: Amanda Czepiel, JD Senior Editor, Safety: Emily Scace Senior Production Manager—CMS: Matt Sharpe Content Production Specialist: Sherry Newcomb Quality Control Associate: Linda Costa Proofreaders: Joan Carlson, Brechin Knapp This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. (From a Declaration of Principles jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers.) © 2017 BLR®—BUSINESS & LEGAL RESOURCES All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in part or in whole by any process without written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use or the internal or personal use of specific clients is granted by Business & Legal Resources. For permission to reuse material from OSHA’s Top 10 Violations for 2016, 978-1- 55645-585-8, please go to http://www.copyright.com or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978- 750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and regis- tration for a variety of uses. ISBN: 978-1-55645-585-8 Printed in the United States of America Questions or comments about this publication? Contact: BLR—Business & Legal Resources 100 Winners Circle, Suite 300 Nashville, TN 37027 800-727-5257 http://www.blr.com ii Top 10 OSHA Violations for 2016 Table of contents Introduction .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Threshold Enactments (2009-2015) 2015
    NCSL: Drug Threshold Enactments 2009-2015 Page | 1 Drug Threshold Enactments (2009-2015) 2015 Alabama SB 67 Lowers from a class C to class D felony first degree possession of marijuana if the person possesses marijuana for personal use after previously being convicted of certain marijuana possession offenses. Connecticut HB 7104 Reduces from a felony to a class A misdemeanor possession of any amount of illegal drug. Reduces from a felony to a class A misdemeanor possession of a half-ounce or more of marijuana. Kentucky SB 192 Creates a new class C felony of importing heroin and a new class B felony of aggravated trafficking in a controlled substance in the first degree if the substance trafficked was 100 grams or more of heroin. Increases the penalty from a class A misdemeanor to a class D felony for drug trafficking that involves more than 120 dosage units. Louisiana HB 149 Creates graduated penalties for first time possession of marijuana offenses by weight, reduces penalties for second and third convictions for possession of marijuana offenses, and creates a penalty for fourth conviction of possession of marijuana. • First offense possession of less than 14 grams of marijuana is punishable by not more than 15 days in jail and not more than $300. • First offense possession of more than 14 grams but less than two and a half pounds of marijuana is punishable by not more than six months jail and not more than $500. • Reduces second offense possession of marijuana from not more than 5 years and not less than $250 but not more than $2,000, to not more than 6 months in jail and nor more than $1,000.
    [Show full text]
  • AN ACT Relating to Child Welfare and Declaring an Emergency. 1 Be It
    UNOFFICIAL COPY 19 RS HB 158/EN 1 AN ACT relating to child welfare and declaring an emergency. 2 Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky: 3 SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 199 IS CREATED TO 4 READ AS FOLLOWS: 5 (1) The cabinet shall require a staff member of a child-caring facility to submit to 6 background checks in accordance with 42 U.S.C. sec. 671(a)(20)(D) and the 7 implementing federal rules, including national and state fingerprint-supported 8 criminal background checks by the Department of Kentucky State Police and the 9 Federal Bureau of Investigation. 10 (2) The child-caring facility staff member shall provide the member's fingerprints to 11 the Department of Kentucky State Police for submission to the Federal Bureau of 12 Investigation after a state criminal background check is conducted. 13 (3) The results of the national and state criminal background checks shall be sent to 14 the cabinet. 15 (4) The cabinet may register a child-caring facility staff member in the rap back 16 system. 17 (5) The request for background checks shall be in a manner approved by the Justice 18 and Public Safety Cabinet, and the Cabinet for Health and Family Services may 19 charge a fee to be paid by a child-caring facility not to exceed the actual cost of 20 processing the request. 21 (6) The cabinet shall promulgate administrative regulations in accordance with KRS 22 Chapter 13A to implement this section. 23 Section 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Willful Neglect' Is Difficult to Pin Down but Can Result in Enormous
    Volume 10, Number 2 • February 2010 Practical News and Strategies for Complying With HIPAA Contents First AG HIPAA Suit Portends More State Actions; Sends Message on Encryption Offshore BAs Pose 3 PHI Risk, But Have What began as an unfortunate — though not uncommon — loss of a hard drive has Incentives to resulted in a world of hurt for Health Net, Inc., which is now the target of the first-ever Self-Regulate lawsuit brought by a state attorney general for possible violations of HIPAA. Effective Dates for Compounding Health Net’s troubles, on Jan. 21, the Connecticut State Medical 3 Privacy and Security Society, which represents physicians, filed a formal complaint to the HHS Office for Provisions in ARRA Civil Rights, charging that Health Net gave UnitedHealthcare inappropriate access to all member files, committing “an unambiguous violation of hundreds of thousands of What to Include in 4 Amendments to Connecticut patients’ privacy rights” (see box, p. 11). BA Agreements Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal — an announced candidate for the U.S. Senate — brought the suit in U.S. District Court in Connecticut on Jan. 13, as Tighten Remote Access RPP predicted he might (RPP 12/09, p. 1). 6 Controls to Prevent the Loss of Data Blumenthal charged Health Net, United and Oxford Health Plans (both subsidiar- ies of UnitedHealth Group, which recently acquired parts of Health Net) with “mul- Patient Privacy tiple violations” of both HIPAA and state laws, including the Connecticut Unfair Trade 10 Court Cases Practices Act, stemming from the May 2009 loss of a hard drive.
    [Show full text]
  • Overland Park, Kansas Municipal Code Table of Contents Title 1 - General Provisions 1.01 Code Adoption
    Overland Park, Kansas Municipal Code Table Of Contents Title 1 - General Provisions 1.01 Code Adoption. 1.01.010 Generally. 1.01.020 Publication-Effect. 1.01.030 Short Title-Citation-Reference. 1.01.040 Reference Applies to Amendments. 1.01.050 Title, Chapter and Section Headings. 1.01.060 Reference to Specific Ordinances. 1.01.070 Supplements Authorized. 1.01.080 Effect of Code on Past Actions and Obligations. 1.01.090 Effective Date of Code. 1.01.100 Ordinance Book Designated. 1.01.110 Constitutionality. 1.04 General Provisions 1.04.010 Definitions. 1.04.020 Grammatical Interpretation. 1.04.030 Prohibited Acts Include Causing, Permitting, and Related Acts. 1.04.040 Construction. 1.04.050 Repeal Not To Revive Any Ordinances. 1.08 Right of Entry for Inspection 1.08.010 Regulations Generally. 1.12 General Penalty 1.12.010 Designated. 1.16 Ward Boundaries (Repealed) 1.16.010 Division - Boundaries - Renumbering - Boundary Adjustment. 1.20 Official Newspaper (Repealed) 1.20.010 Exemption from K.S.A. 13-1420. 1.20.020 Governing Body to Designate Official Newspaper. 1.20.030 Official Designation. 1.20.040 Official Newspaper To Have Been Published for a Year. 1.20.050 More Than One Official Newspaper. 1.24 Citations for Violations 1.24.010 Definitions. 1.24.020 Notice To Appear. 1.24.030 Time Specified. 1.24.040 Municipal Court. 1.24.050 Distribution of Notice. 1.24.060 Complaint To Be Filed. 1.24.070 Chapter Inapplicable To Certain Violations. Legal Basis for Overland Park, Kansas Title 2 - Administration and Personnel Page 1 2.09 City Manager/Governing Body Article I.
    [Show full text]
  • Needle Sharing Among Intravenous Drug Abusers: National and International Perspectives
    Needle Sharing Among Intravenous Drug Abusers: National and International Perspectives U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES • Public Health Service • Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration Needle Sharing Among Intravenous Drug Abusers: National and International Perspectives Editors: Robert J. Battjes, D.S.W. Roy W. Pickens, Ph.D. Division of Clinical Research National Institute on Drug Abuse NIDA Research Monograph 80 1988 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration National Institute on Drug Abuse 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 NIDA Research Monographs are prepared by the research divisions of the National Institute on Drug Abuse and published by its Office of Science. The primary objective of the series is to provide critical reviews of research problem areas and techniques, the content of state-of-the-art conferences, and integrative research reviews. Its dual publication emphasis is rapid and targeted dissemination to the scientific and professional community. Editorial Advisors MARTIN W. ADLER, Ph.D. MARY L. JACOBSON Temple University School of Medrcrne National Federation of Parents for Philadelphia. Pennsylvania Drug-Free Youth Omaha, Nebraska SYDNEY ARCHER, Ph.D. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, New York REESE T. JONES, M.D. Langley Porter Neuropsychiatric lnstitute RICHARD E. BELLEVILLE. Ph.D. San Francisco, California NB Associates, Health Sciences RockviIle, Maryland DENISE KANDEL, Ph.D. KARST J. BESTEMAN College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alcohol and Drug Problems Association Columbia University of North America New York, New York Washington, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Penal Code Offenses by Punishment Range Office of the Attorney General 2
    PENAL CODE BYOFFENSES PUNISHMENT RANGE Including Updates From the 85th Legislative Session REV 3/18 Table of Contents PUNISHMENT BY OFFENSE CLASSIFICATION ........................................................................... 2 PENALTIES FOR REPEAT AND HABITUAL OFFENDERS .......................................................... 4 EXCEPTIONAL SENTENCES ................................................................................................... 7 CLASSIFICATION OF TITLE 4 ................................................................................................. 8 INCHOATE OFFENSES ........................................................................................................... 8 CLASSIFICATION OF TITLE 5 ............................................................................................... 11 OFFENSES AGAINST THE PERSON ....................................................................................... 11 CLASSIFICATION OF TITLE 6 ............................................................................................... 18 OFFENSES AGAINST THE FAMILY ......................................................................................... 18 CLASSIFICATION OF TITLE 7 ............................................................................................... 20 OFFENSES AGAINST PROPERTY .......................................................................................... 20 CLASSIFICATION OF TITLE 8 ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Sea Dive Ebook Free Download
    DEEP SEA DIVE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Frank Lampard | 112 pages | 07 Apr 2016 | Hachette Children's Group | 9780349132136 | English | London, United Kingdom Deep Sea Dive PDF Book Zombie Worm. Marrus orthocanna. Deep diving can mean something else in the commercial diving field. They can be found all over the world. Depth at which breathing compressed air exposes the diver to an oxygen partial pressure of 1. Retrieved 31 May Diving medicine. Arthur J. Retrieved 13 March Although commercial and military divers often operate at those depths, or even deeper, they are surface supplied. Minimal visibility is still possible far deeper. The temperature is rising in the ocean and we still don't know what kind of an impact that will have on the many species that exist in the ocean. Guiel Jr. His dive was aborted due to equipment failure. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC. Depth limit for a group of 2 to 3 French Level 3 recreational divers, breathing air. Underwater diving to a depth beyond the norm accepted by the associated community. Limpet mine Speargun Hawaiian sling Polespear. Michele Geraci [42]. Diving safety. Retrieved 19 September All of these considerations result in the amount of breathing gas required for deep diving being much greater than for shallow open water diving. King Crab. Atrial septal defect Effects of drugs on fitness to dive Fitness to dive Psychological fitness to dive. The bottom part which has the pilot sphere inside. List of diving environments by type Altitude diving Benign water diving Confined water diving Deep diving Inland diving Inshore diving Muck diving Night diving Open-water diving Black-water diving Blue-water diving Penetration diving Cave diving Ice diving Wreck diving Recreational dive sites Underwater environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Controlled Substances Act
    HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE TITLE 6. FOOD, DRUGS, ALCOHOL, AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES SUBTITLE C. SUBSTANCE ABUSE REGULATION AND CRIMES CHAPTER 481. TEXAS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec.A481.001.AASHORT TITLE. This chapter may be cited as the Texas Controlled Substances Act. Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 678, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1989. Sec.A481.002.AADEFINITIONS. In this chapter: (1)AA"Administer" means to directly apply a controlled substance by injection, inhalation, ingestion, or other means to the body of a patient or research subject by: (A)AAa practitioner or an agent of the practitioner in the presence of the practitioner; or (B)AAthe patient or research subject at the direction and in the presence of a practitioner. (2)AA"Agent" means an authorized person who acts on behalf of or at the direction of a manufacturer, distributor, or dispenser. The term does not include a common or contract carrier, public warehouseman, or employee of a carrier or warehouseman acting in the usual and lawful course of employment. (3)AA"Commissioner" means the commissioner of state health services or the commissioner 's designee. (4)AA"Controlled premises" means: (A)AAa place where original or other records or documents required under this chapter are kept or are required to be kept; or (B)AAa place, including a factory, warehouse, other establishment, or conveyance, where a person registered under this chapter may lawfully hold, manufacture, distribute, dispense, administer, possess, or otherwise dispose of a controlled substance or other item governed by the federal Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limited Rights of Putative Fathers Under NC Gen. Stat. § 48-3-601
    Campbell Law Review Volume 23 Article 5 Issue 2 Spring 2001 April 2001 Closing the Window of Opportunity: The Limited Rights of Putative Fathers under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 48-3-601 and In re Byrd Lauren Vaughan Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.campbell.edu/clr Part of the Family Law Commons Recommended Citation Lauren Vaughan, Closing the Window of Opportunity: The Limited Rights of Putative Fathers under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 48-3-601 and In re Byrd, 23 Campbell L. Rev. 305 (2001). This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Repository @ Campbell University School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Campbell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Repository @ Campbell University School of Law. Vaughan: Closing the Window of Opportunity: The Limited Rights of Putative NOTE Closing the Window of Opportunity: The Limited Rights of Puta- tive Fathers Under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 48-3-601 and In re Byrd I. INTRODUCTION In September 1997, eighteen-year-old Shelly O'Donnell informed seventeen-year-old Michael Gilmartin that she was pregnant, and that based on her estimated due date, she believed that he was the father of her unborn child.' During the next two months, Shelly went to see Michael often, discussed her pregnancy with him, and showed him ultrasound images of her baby.2 During that time, Michael and his mother offered Shelly the opportunity to alleviate some of her expenses by allowing her to live rent-free in Michael's mother's home during her pregnancy.3 Shelly, however, declined the offer.4 Soon after that, in November 1997, Michael left moved away and began working two full-time jobs in order to save money for the baby.5 Later that month, Shelly contacted Michael and told him that she had received a revised estimated delivery date for the baby that indi- cated that he might not be the father of her child.6 Not long after learning this information, Shelly decided to give up her child for adop- tion and began working through an adoption network.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Safety Tip Life Is All About Choices!® August 1, 2016
    “Your Connection for Workplace Safety” Phone: 920-208-7520 We’re about service, commitment, results, and accountability! Weekly Safety Tip Life Is All About Choices!® August 1, 2016 SCI Safety Tip: Preparedness is Prevention: Emergency Preparedness Could Have Prevented These Injuries Source: http://www.blr.com Date: July 29, 2016 When a 900-gallon melt tank containing hexane and ethanol overpressurized and exploded in December 2015 at a food additive manufacturing facility in Newark, Ohio, owned by Arboris®, LLC, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) faulted the employer’s process safety management (PSM) for failing SCI Safety Slogan to prevent the explosion. But even when the fireball erupted, the injuries suffered by four employees were not necessarily inevitable. With better emergency preparedness, OSHA concluded, the employer could have prevented or minimized the workers’ injuries. Here’s where their emergency preparedness fell down on the job. Inadequate Egress According to OSHA, Arboris failed to designate sufficient egress routes. OSHA’s emergency exit routes design and construction requirements, found in 29 CFR 1910.36, require at least two exit routes to be available in a workplace if the number of employees, the size of the building, its occupancy, or the arrangement of the James Lehrke-SCI workplace is such that all employees would not be able to evacuate safely during an emergency. Two contractors working at the Arboris facility had to escape the fireball by climbing over an 8-foot security fence topped with triple- Safety Connections Inc. Page 2 strand barbed wire—clearly, the escape routes were less than ideal.
    [Show full text]