DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Environmental Assessment ANAHOLA SOLAR PROJECT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Environmental Assessment ANAHOLA SOLAR PROJECT Final Environmental Assessment ANAHOLA SOLAR PROJECT ANAHOLA, KAUA‘I PREPARED FOR: Kaua‘i Island Utility Cooperative USDA Rural Utilities Service Department of Hawaiian Homelands PREPARED BY: SEPTEMBER 2013 PROJECT SUMMARY Project: Anahola Solar Project Kaua‘i Island Utility Cooperative 4463 Pāhe‘e Street Applicant: Līhu‘e, Hawai‘i 96766-2000 Contact: Brad W. Rockwell (808) 246-8289 USDA Rural Utilities Service 1400 Independence Ave. SW Mail Stop 1571 Washington, DC 20250 Approving Agency: Department of Hawaiian Home Lands State of Hawai‘i 91-5420 Kapolei Parkway Kapolei, HI 96707 Location: Anahola, Kaua‘i, Hawai‘i Installation of a ~12 MW photovoltaic facility including a dedicated substation with interconnections to the island-wide Proposed Project: electrical grid and other ancillary facilities and construction of a Transmission and Distribution service center and base yard.. Tax Map Key: (4) 4-7-004:002 Parcel Area: 422.15 acres Project Area: 60 acres Judicial District: Kawaihau State Land Use District: Agriculture County Zoning: Agriculture NEPA Environmental Assessment Chapter 343 Environmental Assessment National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System – Notice of Intent [Construction] (NPDES-NOI[C]) Noise permit Required Permits & Approvals: Construction on a State Highway Permit Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity Grading Permit Building Permit (Service Center only) Well Construction and Pump Installation Permit Determination: Finding of No Significant Impact Parties Consulted: See Chapter 9 Planning Solutions, Inc. 210 Ward Avenue, Suite 330 Consultant: Honolulu, HI 96814 Contact: Perry White (808) 550-4483 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANAHOLA SOLAR PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 PROJECT PARTICIPANTS .............................................................................................................................1-6 1.2.1 KRS One ...................................................................................................................................................1-6 1.2.2 Rural Utilities Service (RUS) Involvement ..............................................................................................1-6 1.2.3 Hawaiian Homes Involvement ..................................................................................................................1-7 1.2.4 REC Solar .................................................................................................................................................1-8 1.3 REGULATORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE EA ...................................................................................... 1-10 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ................................................................... 2-1 2.1 SOLAR ARRAY ...........................................................................................................................................2-1 2.1.1 Solar Array: Description ...........................................................................................................................2-1 2.1.2 Solar Array: Construction Activities ........................................................................................................2-1 2.1.3 Solar Array: Operation and Maintenance ............................................................................................... 2-10 2.1.4 Solar Array: Decommissioning............................................................................................................... 2-10 2.2 ANAHOLA SUBSTATION ............................................................................................................................ 2-11 2.2.1 Anahola Substation: Proposed Facilities ................................................................................................ 2-11 2.2.2 Anahola Substation: Construction Activities .......................................................................................... 2-17 2.2.3 Substation: Operation and Maintenance Activities ................................................................................. 2-17 2.2.4 Substation: Decommissioning ............................................................................................................... 2-18 2.3 ANAHOLA SERVICE CENTER .................................................................................................................... 2-18 2.3.1 Anahola Service Center: Construction Activities ................................................................................... 2-23 2.3.2 Anahola Service Center: Operations and Maintenance .......................................................................... 2-23 2.3.3 Anahola Service Center: Decommissioning ........................................................................................... 2-23 2.4 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE .................................................................................................................. 2-23 2.5 PROJECT COSTS ........................................................................................................................................ 2-24 3. PURPOSE & NEED OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ............................................................ 3-1 3.1 NEED FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC ARRAY AND SUBSTATION .................................................................................3-1 3.2 NEED FOR THE SERVICE CENTER ................................................................................................................3-4 3.4 OBJECTIVES & PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ..............................................................................3-6 4. ALTERNATIVES EVALUATED IN THE EA .......................................................................... 4-1 4.1 NO ACTION ................................................................................................................................................4-2 4.2 SOLAR ARRAY AND SUBSTATION ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED AND ELIMINATED ....................................4-2 4.2.1 Alternate Locations ...................................................................................................................................4-2 4.2.2 Alternate Sizes ..........................................................................................................................................4-4 4.2.3 Alternate Timing (Delayed Action) ..........................................................................................................4-5 4.3 SERVICE CENTER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED AND ELIMINATED ............................................................4-5 4.3.1 Alternate Size/Location ............................................................................................................................4-5 4.3.2 Alternate Timing: Delayed Action ............................................................................................................4-6 5. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, & MITIGATION MEASURES .................................................................................................................................. 5-1 5.1 TOPOGRAPHY, GEOLOGY, AND SOILS .........................................................................................................5-1 5.1.1 Existing Conditions: Topography, Geology, and Soils ............................................................................5-1 5.1.2 Probable Construction Impacts on Topography, Geology, and Soils .......................................................5-2 5.1.3 Probable Operational Impacts on Topography, Geology, and Soils .........................................................5-3 5.1.4 Probable DECOMMISSIONING IMPACTS on Topography, Geology, and Soils .................................5-4 5.2 HYDROLOGY ..............................................................................................................................................5-4 5.2.1 Existing Conditions: Hydrology ..............................................................................................................5-4 PAGE i ANAHOLA SOLAR PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS 5.2.1.1 Existing Conditions: Surface Water .......................................................................................... 5-4 5.2.1.2 Existing Conditions: Groundwater ............................................................................................ 5-7 5.2.2 Probable Impacts: Hydrology ................................................................................................................. 5-9 5.2.2.1 Effects on Surface Runoff Volumes .......................................................................................... 5-9 5.2.2.2 Adequacy of Kūhiō Highway Storm Drainage System ........................................................... 5-11 5.2.2.3 Effects on Surface Water Quality ............................................................................................ 5-12 5.2.2.4 Effects on Groundwater ........................................................................................................... 5-14 5.2.2.5 Sanitary Wastewater Disposal ................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ADA Desk Reference
    DESK REFERENCE (ADA) CT A ISABILITIES D WITH ACCESS FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES UNDER ECTION S 504 MERICANS OF THE REHABILITATION ACT AND A TITLE II OF THE ADA Table of Contents Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 - 1 CHAPTER I—Considerations in the Federal-aid Highway Program 2 I. Authorities 2 -- 1 II. Laws & Regulations 2 -- 3 III. Project Oversight 2 -- 11 IV. Program Oversight 2 -- 15 V. Complaint Investigation and Resolution 2 -- 19 VI. Program and Facility Accessibility 2 -- 23 VII. Accessibility of Pedestrian Rights-of-Way 2 -- 29 VIII. Auxiliary Aids/Communications 2 -- 85 CHAPTER II—Implementation 3 I. Roles and Responsibilities 3 -- 1 • FHWA Headquarters Office of Civil Rights 3 -- 2 • FHWA Resource Center 3 -- 3 • FHWA Division Office • FHWA Federal Lands • State Transportation Agency II. Documentation 3 -- 10 III. ADA Program: Minimum Requirements 3 -- 13 IV. Contract Requirements 3 -- 25 V. Review Guidelines 3 -- 27 APPENDICES 4 *See next page for detailed listing of Appendices Table of Contents Page 4 A. ADA Implementation, Compliance and Enforcement Guide 4 -- A -- 1 B. ADA/504 Technical Assistance Tool 4 -- B -- 1 C. Sample ADA/504 Policy/Assurances 4 -- C -- 1 D. Sample ADA/504 Notice of Nondiscrimination 4 -- D -- 1 E. Sample Reasonable Accommodations Request 4 -- E -- 1 F. Sample Technical Infeasibility Statement 4 -- F -- 1 G. Sample ADA/504 Self-Evaluation 4 -- G -- 1 H. Sample ADA/504 Transition Plan 4 -- H -- 1 I. Selected Nondiscrimination Authorities 4 -- I -- 1 Authorities • 29 USC 794, et seq. - Section 504 4 -- I -- 1 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (as amended by the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987) • 42 USC 126 4 -- I -- 3 Equal Opportunity for Americans with Disabilities • Public Law 100-259;102 Stat.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaii ADA Transition Plan
    AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. TITTLE II TRANSITION PLAN FOR THE STATE OF HAWAII, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION R-1, Highways, April 16, 1999 R-2, Airports, May 14, 1999 PUBLIC NOTICE The State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation (DOT) is requesting public comment on its Self Evaluation for the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Interested persons may review copies of the Self Evaluation in its entirety at the DOT Public Affairs Office 869 Punchbowl Street, Room 506, Honolulu; and at the DOT Kahului Airport District Manager’s Office, DOT Keahole Airport Manager’s Office, Hilo Airport Assistant District Manager’s Office, Lihue Airport District Manager’s Office, Hawaii Centers for Independent Living, and your local regional public library. Comments should be submitted no later than September 14, 1998. Please send comments and recommendations to: Accessibility Planning & Consulting Inc. 1154 Fort Street Mall, Suite 206 Honolulu, Hawaii 96816 Attn: Mr. Bruce Clark Phone: (808) 545- 1141 Fax: (808) 531- 7737 Auxiliary aids and services are available upon request, please contact the DOT ADA Coordinator, Michael Medeiros, Phone (808)587- 2321, Fax (808)587- 2329, TTY (808)587- 2311. R-1, Highways, April 16, 1999 R-2, Airports, May 14, 1999 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The State Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Transition Plan has been developed to fulfill the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (public law 101- 336) under the implementing regulations for Title II, 28 CFR Part 35 §35.150 (d). METHODOLOGY The DOT’s Transition Plan reflects the results of a comprehensive review and survey of the buildings, facilities, programs, and practices that are under the jurisdiction of the Department; who, through its functions, provide these programs and services to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Avis Policies
    AVIS HAWAI`I RENT A CAR GENERAL INFORMATION ACCEPTABLE CREDIT CARDS: Avis GE Capital American Express JCB Card AT&T Capital PHH (Peterson, Howell & Heather) Diners Club Int’l/Amoco Torch MasterCard Diners Club (MC issued outside U.S.) Sears Gold, Premier, Regular Discover Network Visa (Debit cards with a MasterCard or Visa logo are acceptable as a means of credit identification at time of rental or return. Prepaid debit cards are NOT acceptable as credit identification at time of rental. A credit check will be obtained via Equifax and a minimum hold of $400 will be applied to debit card rentals. Specialty vehicles may not be rented using a Debit Card.) . RENTAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. Valid Driver's License. Renters residing outside the U.S. must have their country license. 2. Age Requirements A. 21 years of age with an Avis or Avis-Honored credit card. Renters 21-24 without a qualifying Corporate AWD number will be charged an underage fee of $27.00 per day. 25 years of age when presenting a Debit card with a MC or Visa logo. B. 18-21 years of age with select Avis Corporate AWD number. No underage fee. C. 21 years of age with an Avis or Avis-Honored Prepaid Tour Voucher or Tour Rate package. An Avis-Honored credit card, debit card or cash deposit required. Minimum cash payment of $100.00 or the amount of the estimated additional charges, whichever is greater. Underage fee of $27.00 per day for renters 21-24 may apply. OPTIONAL CHARGES: 1. Loss Damage Waiver: Vehicle Groups: A,B, XL, XD $ 26.99/day Vehicle Groups: C, D,E,G,K,F,V,XH $ 27.99/day Vehicle Groups: H,W,Z,L,S, XS,XP $ 29.99/day Vehicle Groups: XK $ 35.99/day 2.
    [Show full text]
  • HURRICANE LANE (EP142018) 15-28 August 2018
    NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER CENTRAL PACIFIC HURRICANE CENTER TROPICAL CYCLONE REPORT HURRICANE LANE (EP142018) 15-28 August 2018 John L. Beven II National Hurricane Center Derek Wroe Central Pacific Hurricane Center 16 December 20191 GOES WEST VISIBLE IMAGE OF LANE AT 0000 UTC 23 AUGUST NEAR MAXIMUM INTENSITY. Lane was a long-lived tropical cyclone that moved across the eastern and central Pacific as a major hurricane for six days, becoming only the fifth category 5 hurricane (on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale) on record in the central Pacific basin. Lane produced significant flooding and fanned devastating wildfires across the Hawaiian Islands. 1 Original report released 2 April 2019. Updated 16 December 2019 to include best track analysis, summary, verification, impacts, and damages from the Central Pacific Hurricane Center. Hurricane Lane 2 Hurricane Lane 15-28 AUGUST 2018 SYNOPTIC HISTORY Lane was spawned by a tropical wave that emerged from the coast of Africa on 31 July. The wave moved steadily westward across the Atlantic with little or no convection for the next several days, and eventually reached the eastern Pacific on 8 August. Once over the Pacific, the associated convection gradually increased, and the system first showed signs of organized convection on 11 August. Thereafter, the convection became intermittent for the next few days, which slowed development. Despite the lack of persistent convection, a low pressure area formed in association with the disturbance on 13 August about 765 n mi south-southwest of the southern tip of the Baja California Peninsula. Convective banding gradually increased over the western semicircle of the low as the system moved generally westward, and this led to the formation of a tropical depression by 0000 UTC 15 August about 935 n mi southwest of the southern tip of the Baja California peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • An Automation Anomaly Software Did Not Block Erroneous Acceleration Data
    ONRecorD An Automation Anomaly Software did not block erroneous acceleration data. BY MARK LACAGNINA The following information provides an aware- moving the thrust levers to the idle position,” ness of problems in the hope that they can be the report said. Nevertheless, the aircraft pitched avoided in the future. The information is based nose-up again and climbed 2,000 ft. on final reports on aircraft accidents and inci- “The flight crew notified air traffic control dents by official investigative authorities. (ATC) that they could not maintain altitude and requested a descent and radar assistance for a JETS return to Perth,” the report said. “The crew were able to verify the actual aircraft groundspeed Crew Had No Guidance for Response and altitude with ATC.” Boeing 777-200. No damage. No injuries. PFD indications appeared normal during he aircraft was climbing through Flight Level the descent. The PIC engaged the left autopilot (FL) 380, about 38,000 ft, after departing from but then disengaged it when the aircraft pitched TPerth, Western Australia, for a scheduled flight nose-down and banked right. “A similar result to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, the evening of Aug. occurred when the right autopilot was selected, 1, 2005, when the flight crew observed a “LOW so the PIC left the autopilot disengaged and AIRSPEED” advisory on the engine indicating manually flew the aircraft,” the report said. and crew alerting system (EICAS). At the same The PIC was unable to disengage the auto- time, the primary flight display (PFD) showed a throttle system with the disconnect switches on full-right slip/skid indication, said the Australian the thrust levers or the disconnect switch on Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) report.
    [Show full text]
  • VII-1 FIRE DEPARTMENT Robert F. Westerman, Fire Chief MISSION
    FIRE DEPARTMENT Robert F. Westerman, Fire Chief MISSION STATEMENT To preserve and protect life, property and the environment of Kauai County from all hazards and emergencies. DEPARTMENT GOALS The men and women of the Kauai Fire Department are committed to excellence as demonstrated by their dedication and spirit in their continued efforts in making our community a safe place to live. Our employees have effectively carried out their duties in achieving the department’s goals of preventing, suppressing and extinguishing all types of fires; responding to and mitigating any and all types of emergencies (medical, Hazmat, search and rescue, disasters) in a highly trained, professional and safe manner; administering first aid and CPR to the basic life support level (EMT) and to make Kauai a safer place by supporting and promoting training in community CPR, first aid, management of the Kaua‘i County CERT (Community Emergency Response Team). Participating in the State and County’s Civil Support Team (CST) disaster response training, which includes numerous agencies and resources; providing highly trained personnel as part of CD’s Pacific rim’s Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) team; participating in the State and County’s localized disaster response network, which includes other agencies and available resources; enforcing the National Fire Code and promote fire prevention through educational programs and community outreach; maintaining our vehicles and equipment for emergency response through a preventive maintenance program; and providing safe,
    [Show full text]
  • Download Brochure
    EXperienCE AllLIK EHawaii NEVER has B EtoF OREoffer HONOLULU INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT HONOLULU, HAWAI‘I AT LAST, EXCLUSIVE LUXURY JET SERVICE WITH ALOHA... 2 THE RESORT GROUP, a name that offers you world class resorts throughout the islands of Hawaii, is pleased to offer Hawaii’s only locally owned interisland Private Jet service, Resort Air. RESORT AIR understands how important your time is whether your trip is for business or leisure. Private Jet travel saves precious time with no required check-in, and immediate take off. Resort Air also offers exclusive service to small airports throughout the state giving you convenient access to luxury resorts, championship golf courses, designer shopping, exciting entertainment, and secluded island locations. 3 SAFety IS OUR priority Our all jet turbine powered aircraft, is piloted by some of Hawaii’s most experienced and knowledgeable professionals and has a safety record second to none. Our dedication to service is evident from the moment you step aboard. All pilots are qualified Pilot in Command, have more than 100,000 hours combined flight time, and have military and / or airline experience in Hawaii. 4 OUR PILOTS ARE THE EPITOME OF SERVICE PROFESSIONALS All Resort Air pilots attend a mandatory ongoing training course twice yearly from Flight Safety International exceeding the requirements set by the FAA. This ensures maximum safety and professionalism in everything we do. We operate under a stringent FAA Part 135 Air Transport Certificate, the highest safety standards in aviation. Resort Air is a member of the National Business Aviation Association which promotes business aviation safety, access, professional development, operational excellence and security in the aviation industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary and Inventory of Real Proper'iy
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND INVENTORY OF REAL PROPER'IY OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNDER THE CUSTODY AND ACCOUNTABILITY OF FEDERAL CIVILIAN AGENCIES IN THE STATE OF HAWAII MARCH 17,1993 Prepared by the General Services Administration Office of Governmentwide Real Property Relations (- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the Fiscal Year 1992 Treasury and Postal Service, and the Department of Defense Appropriations Bills, language was included directing the General Services Administration (GSA), and the Department of Defense (DOD) to conduct an inventory of all real property owned or controlled by the Federal Government in the state of Hawaii. GSA was to conduct the inventory of Federal civilian agencies. DOD was to conduct the inventory of its own properties and submit it to GSA which would submit a complete inventory package to Congress by September 30, 1992. The request for an inventory was prompted principally by the lack of a centralized data base listing and detailing the historic use of Hawaiian lands ceded, set aside, or conveyed since 1898 to the United States Government for use by its agencies for specified public or governmental purposes. A comprehensive, consolidated and verified inventory was considered essential to determine the status of all public lands, ceded, acquired or controlled, in the State of Hawaii. COMMENCEMENT OF INVENTORY The inventory has been conducted and is reported in two segments, civilian agencies and Department of Defense. Civilian agency inventory. Utilizing the services of two real property experts with experience in Hawaii real property and ceded land issues, GSA commenced its inventory of civilian agency real property on March 3, 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas of Natural Hazards in the Hawaiian Coastal Zone
    U.S. Department of the Interior Geologic Investigations U.S. Geological Survey Series I-2761 Cover Photos High waves at Koko Head, Oahu. Stream flooding along the Hanalei Flying debris in Lihue, Kauai, during (Photo, Steve Businger.) River, Kauai. (Photo, Scott Calhoun.) Hurricane Iniki. (Photo, Bruce Asato.) Beach loss is more common along Tsunami bore entering the mouth of Sea-level rise and coastal erosion hardened shorelines (left) than along the Wailuku River, Hilo, Hawaii, on threaten much of the coastline and unhardened shorelines (right), April 1, 1946. infrastructure in Hawaii, Honokowai Kaaawa,Oahu.(Photo,Charles Fletcher.) (Photo, Shigeru Ushijima.) Point, Maui. (Photo, Charles Fletcher.) Destruction at Princeville Airport, Coastal erosion at the Halama Kauai in the wake of Hurricane Iniki. shoreline in Kihei, Maui. Lava entering the sea near Kalapana, (Photo, Bruce Richmond.) (Photo, Charles Fletcher.) Hawaii. (Photo, Scott Rowland.) U.S. Department of the Interior Geologic Investigations U.S. Geological Survey Series I-2761 Atlas of Natural Hazards in the Hawaiian Coastal Zone By Charles H. Fletcher III, Eric E. Grossman, Bruce M. Richmond, and Ann E. Gibbs Prepared in cooperation with University of Hawaii, State of Hawaii Office of Planning, and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary Acknowledgements U.S. Geologic Survey Charles G. Groat, Director Additional Research Iris Stewart and Alex Ress University of Hawaii School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply Department of Geology and Geophysics endorsement by the U.S Government 1680 East-West Road Honolulu, HI 96822 Cartography United States Government Printing Office: 2002 Jane J.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaii Airports and Flying Safety Guide
    HAWAII AIRPORTS and FLYING SAFETY GUIDE This guide is published by the State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Airports Division, in the interest of flight safety and the promotion of aviation in the Hawaiian Islands. You will find a list of airport facilities, including field diagrams, traffic patterns and details which should be useful for visual approach to each airport. For special notices covering up-to-date field conditions, fuel availability, etc., consult the current Pacific Chart Supplement and NOTAMS. Every reasonable attempt has been made to insure the accuracy of material contained in this guide, however, the Department of Transportation is not responsible for omissions or errors that may appear. Please be aware that the information contained herein is for informational purposes only. We hope that this guide will be of assistance in using the State Airport System. Any comments which you may have concerning information for future revisions will be appreciated. NOT FOR NAVIGATION Compliments of Department of Transportation Airports Division Honolulu International Airport 400 Rodgers Boulevard, Suite 700 Honolulu, HI 96819-1880 Telephone (808) 838-8701 Facsimile (808) 83 8- 8760 email: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL INFORMATION Page General Instructions for Operations at State Airports ..................................... 1 Aviation Weather In Hawai‘i ........................................................................... 4 Station Designators of Hawaiian Airports ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography American Resort Development Association. Hawaii’s Timeshare Industry – An Industry Overview and Economic Impact Analysis. 1997. Amfac/JMB Hawaii, Inc.; The Lihue Plantation Company, Limited (Prepared by PBR Hawaii). Lihue-Hanamaulu Master Plan, Petition for a Zoning Amendment. August 1995. Arendt, Randall with Elizabeth A. Brabee, Harry L. Dodson, Christine Reid, Robert D. Yaro (American Planning Association). Rural By Design: Maintaining Small Town Character. 1994. Bank of Hawaii. Construction in Hawaii 1997. Thirty-first Annual Report on Hawaii’s Construction Industry. Bank of Hawaii. Hawaii 1997, Annual Economic Report, Volume 46. Bennett, Wendell Clark (Bernice P. Bishop Museum). Archaeology of Kauai. Center for Compatible Economic Development. Community Economy Environment, A Citizen’s Guide to Achieving a Healthy Community, Economy & Environment. 1996 Chuck Blay; Robert Siemers. Kauai’s Geologic History, A Simplified Guide. 1998. Cooke Foundation, Limited; Atherton Family Foundation (Prepared by Hawaii Community Services Council). Scanning Hawaii: Forces for Change 1995. County of Kauai (Prepared by Aotani & Hartwell Associates, Inc.). Kauai Urban Design Plan. August 1977. County of Kauai (Prepared by Aotani & Hartwell Associates, Inc.). Kauai Urban Design Plan, Kapaa, Wailua, Nawiliwili, Koloa, Poipu, Hanapepe, Waimea Urban Design Criteria. August 1977. County of Kauai (Prepared by Goldman, Sachs & Company). Infrastructure Financing Report. March 1991 County of Kauai (Prepared by Marshall Kaplan, Gans, Kahn and Yamamoto). Hanapepe- Eleele Community Development Plan. December 1974. County of Kauai (Prepared by Muroda & Associates, Inc.; EDAW Inc.). Koloa-Poipu- Kalaheo Development Plan Phase II: Development Plan (Draft). County of Kauai (Prepared by R.M. Towill Corporation). Storm Drainage Manual for the County of Kauai, Summary of Recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaua'i Short-Range Transit Plan
    KAUA‘I SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Final Report February 2018 Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................. ES-1 Why a Short-Range Transit Plan? ................................................................................................................................................................. ES-2 What Have We Heard From the Community? ........................................................................................................................................... ES-3 What Are the Key Themes?............................................................................................................................................................................ ES-5 How Do We Improve Transit on Kaua‘i? ..................................................................................................................................................... ES-7 What’s the Timeline? ...................................................................................................................................................................................... ES-24 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 How Is this Report Structured? ........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]