Tha Alpine List of Sites of Community Importance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tha Alpine List of Sites of Community Importance Centre Thématique Européen pour la Protection de la Nature et la Biodiversité Sous contrat de l’Agence Européenne de l’Environnement European Topic Centre on Nature Protection and Biodiversity Under contract to the European Environment Agency THE ALPINE LIST OF SITES OF COMMUNITY IMPORTANCE 1. THE ALPINE BIOGEOGRAPHIC REGION 1 Within the European Union the Alpine biogeographic region is divided into 4 parts, the Pyrenees, the Alps, the Apennines and the Scandes. These different mountain chains present an extremely complex and varied topography. The Alps originated in the collision of the Africa and Eurasia continental plates. The geological structure that resulted from this collision has been remodelled by erosion, torrential rivers and streams. They form a crescent of some 1200 km long and with an average width of 200 km. The Alps are the highest EU 15 mountains with the highest peak at 4807 m (Mont Blanc, France, Italy). In the Apennines the past glaciations and karst phenomena have marked the morphology of the mountains. The rock is mostly calcareous. The Apennines are divided in 2 parts with a total area of 3000 km2. The highest peak of the Apennines is Corno Grande at 2914 m (Italy). The Pyrenees are recent reworkings of an ancient mountain chain. The sediments folded over a granite base were submerged and covered by secondary sediments. The range is 430 km long and 10 km wide at its eastern end but reaches a width of 150 km in the central zone. The highest point is the Pic d’Aneto (Spain), at 3404 m. The Scandes were shaped during successive periods of glaciation and present a mixture of partly transformed volcanic rocks and sand stone with layers of sedimentary limestone. There is an average elevation of 500m, with several peaks over 1000m, the highest summit within the EU is Kebnekaise (Sweden) at 2123m although there are higher summits in Norway. The climate of the Alps is Mediterranean in the south and temperate in the north. The mountains act as a bridge and this contributes to their climatic and biological diversity. The valleys of the central Alps surrounded by mountains, which protect them from atmospheric disturbance, have lower rainfall than those on the periphery of the Alps. This leads to a marked difference in vegetation between the internal valleys, which have affinities to steppic vegetation found further east, and the outer valleys, which are more continental or mediterranean. In the Apennines, the climate is influenced by altitude while the Italian climate is prevalently Mediterranean in this part. They are particularly open to the winds from the Adriatic and the south. There are long stable periods of warm temperatures with little rain during the summer and cold weather associated with heavier rain and snowfalls during the winter. In the Pyrenees, the northern slopes are exposed to the influence of the Atlantic Ocean (high precipitation) while the south experiences a Mediterranean climate (dry). Winds from the east and southeast, carry damp air from the Mediterranean, these areas are humid. An intricate mosaic of climate patterns can be found on both sides of the Pyrenees. In the Fennoscandian mountains, temperature and humidity, especially related to the length of the snow-free season, are the main climatic factors structuring the vegetation. The increasing latitude and altitude create two main regional climatic clines, running south- north (variation of temperature) and coast-inland (variation of humidity). The Scandinavian peninsula is favoured by a relatively oceanic climate due to the Gulf Stream which makes the difference in vegetation less pronounced between south and north than in more continental European alpine areas. 1 Further information on the Alpine Region may be find in the on-line report 'Europe's Biodiversity – biogeographical regions and seas' published by the European Environment Agency at http://reports.eea.eu.int/report_2002_0524_154909/en/tab_abstract_RLR; the booklet 'Alpine Biodiversity in Europe: an introduction' by Laszlo Nagy, Des Thompson, Georg Grabherr, Christian Körner (2003) also gives a good overview (http://www.jncc.gov.uk/Publications/alpine_biodiversity/default.htm#download). Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle Tel: + 33 1 40 79 38 70 57 rue Cuvier Fax: + 33 1 40 79 38 67 F - 75231 PARIS CEDEX [email protected] The Alpine List of Sites of Community Importance 2. THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE (92/43/EEC) IN THE ALPINE REGION Annex I of the Habitats Directive lists 198 habitat types, 65 of which are priority. Ninety- nine Annex I habitat types are present in the Alpine region, 34 of which are priority (see Fig. 1 and Fig. 2). The distribution by Member State is different in each sub region: 79 in Alps (60 in Austria, 43 in Germany, 64 in France and 64 in Italy), 60 in Pyrenees (48 in Spain and 50 in France), 42 in Apennines (Italy) and 44 in Fennoscandia (27 in Finland and 40 in Sweden) 49 % in other biogeographic regions Non priority Priority Habitats Habitats Priority Non priority Habitats Habitats 51 % in Alpine region Figure 1: Percentage of Annex I habitats present in the Alpine region (34% of non-priority habitats and 17% of priority habitats) No Annex I habitat type is restricted to the Alpine region but several are characteristic of the region such as Alpine & Boreal heaths (4060) and Sub-Arctic Salix spp. scrub (4080). Some habitats are marginal in the alpine region and are typical of adjacent regions. The table below shows a few examples of habitat types present in only one site of the Alpine region: Code Description MS 1340 Inland salt meadows FR 3120 Oligotrophic waters containing very few minerals generally on FR sandy soils of the West Mediterranean, with Isoetes spp. 9080 Fennoscandian deciduous swamp woods FI 9540 Mediterranean pine forests with endemic Mesogean pines IT 200 700 N s 600 of species umber 150 500 400 100 300 50 200 Number of habitat Number 100 0 0 c al a ne lanti Alpi t Boreal tinent ranean A er Con Macaronesi Medit Figure 2: Number of habitats types and species of the Habitats Directive by biogeographic region EEA – ETC/NPB, Paris, October 2003 2 The Alpine List of Sites of Community Importance The Alpine region is rich in species and many of them are listed in the Annex II of the Directive: 97 animal species (13 of which are priority) and 63 plant species (4 of which are priority) (see Fig. 3). The distribution by Member State is different in each sub region: 113 in the Alps (71 in Austria, 28 in Germany, 49 in France and 76 in Italy), 41 in Pyrenees (33 in Spain and 34 in France), 29 in Apennines (Italy) and 42 in Fennoscandia (20 in Finland and 39 in Sweden). 77 % in other biogeographic regions other species priority priority other species species species 23 % in Alpine region Figure 3: Percentage of Annex II species present in the Alpine region (17% of non-priority species and 6% of priority species) Among the Annex II species, there are a small number of endemic species in the Alpine region: 7 animals and 19 plants. Among the vertebrates, the Pyrenean ibex (1370 - Capra pyrenaica pyrenaica, a priority taxon) was classified as critically endangered in 1992 but became extinct in 2000. In the Alps Salamandra atra aurorae (1169, a priority species) has an extremely small range and is critically endangered in Italy. For the plants, the 4 sub regions have different numbers of endemic species listed on Annex II: 1 each in the Pyrenees and the Apennines, 7 in the Alps and 10 in Fennoscandia. Table 1: List of Annex II species that are only present in the Alpine region (only one proposed site for the species in bold) Group Code P Species name MS Sub region Inv 1045 Coenagrion hylas AT Alp Inv 1072 Erebia calcaria IT Alp Inv 1073 Erebia christi IT Alp Inv 1080 * Carabus olympiae IT Alp Inv 1932 Erebia medusa polaris FI Fennoscan Amp 1169 * Salamandra atra aurorae IT Alp Mam 1370 * Capra pyrenaica pyrenaica ES-extinct Pyr Bryo 1380 Distichophyllum carinatum DE Alp Pteri 1958 Dryopteris fragans FI Fennoscan Angio 1467 * Gypsophila papillosa IT Alp Angio 1508 Alyssum pyrenaicum FR Pyr Angio 1524 Saxifraga tombeanensis IT Alp Angio 1534 Potentilla delphinensis FR Alp Angio 1583 Daphne petraea IT Alp Angio 1630 Androsace mathildae IT Apen Angio 1710 Linaria tonzigii IT Alp Angio 1918 * Stipa styriaca AT Alp Angio 1944 Arenaria humifusa SE Fennoscan EEA – ETC/NPB, Paris, October 2003 3 The Alpine List of Sites of Community Importance Group Code P Species name MS Sub region Angio 1947 Braya linearis SE Fennoscan Angio 1956 Draba cacuminum SE Fennoscan Angio 1959 Gymnigritella runei SE Fennoscan Angio 1961 Luzula arctica SE Fennoscan Angio 1964 Papaver laestadianum SE Fennoscan Angio 1965 Papaver radicatum SE Fennoscan hyperboreum Angio 1967 Platanthera obtusata SE Fennoscan oligantha Angio 1969 Primula scandinavica SE Fennoscan 3. THE ALPINE SITES OF COMMUNITY IMPORTANCE (SCI) Among the seven concerned Member States, only 5 sent their first list of proposed sites of community importance (pSCI) to the Commission in 1997, the year that the first scientific biogeographic seminar took place (Salzburg, Austria, October 1997). The second seminar was held in 4 parts, one for each sub region: the Apennines (Rome, Italy, March 1998), the Fennoscandia mountains (Vargön, Sweden, April 1999), the Alps (Gap, France, July 1999) and the Pyrenees (Torla, Spain, September 1999) after Finland and France sent their lists of proposed SCI and some additional proposals of SCI by the other Member states. The third seminar (Brussels, Belgium, October 2001) was held for the seven concerned Member States after some new proposals of SCI. At this seminar, the list of pSCI for some Member States was insufficient for several habitat types and species and four bilateral meetings were held in 2002 with Austria, Spain, France and Italy.
Recommended publications
  • Project of Strategic Interest NEXTDATA
    Project of Strategic Interest NEXTDATA WP 1.2 - GAW-WMO climate observatories Deliverable D1.2.5 Report on the upgrade of GAW-WMO stations with Italian management and related to the SHARE project. WP Coordinator: Angela Marinoni CNR-ISAC Partners: CNR-ISAC, URT Ev-K2-CNR 1 Report on upgrade carried out at GAW Global Stations “O. Vittori” at Monte Cimone and Nepal Climate Observatory Pyramid in the Himalayas 1. “O. Vittori” at Monte Cimone (2165 m, Northern Appenines) The upgrades carried out at Monte Cimone station concern aerosol, gases and radiation measurements. In particular the following measurement programs have been upgraded: - Aerosol size distribution from 10 nm to 800 nm has been completely renewed according to GAW/ACTRIS recommendations. - Aerosol scattering coefficient measured since 2007 at 525 nm has been upgraded with measurement in two additional wave lengths: 450 and 700 nm. Moreover, the following measurement programs have been newly started: - The aerosol size distribution from 500 nm to 20 µm based on time of flight was set up in July 2013. - Radiation measurement program (feasibility study). - Continuous nitrogen oxides (NOx), nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) measurements suitable for remote high-mountain stations (on test at Bologna laboratories). - Continuous of (SO2) sulfur dioxide measurements is on test in Bologna laboratories, ready for installation at CMN station. - Observations of aerosol vertical profiles have been carried out at Mt. Cimone. After a test installation in October 2012, several improvements were carried out in order to guarantee continuous observations also during winter season. I. Aerosol size distribution from 10 nm to 800 nm The number size distribution of atmospheric aerosol particles is a basic, but essential parameter required in calculations of the effects of aerosols on climate, human health, and eco-systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Signals in a Multispecies Tree-Ring Network from Central And
    Clim. Past Discuss., doi:10.5194/cp-2017-48, 2017 Manuscript under review for journal Clim. Past Discussion started: 17 March 2017 c Author(s) 2017. CC-BY 3.0 License. 1 Climate signals in a multispecies tree-ring network from central and 2 southern Italy and reconstruction of the late summer temperatures 3 since the early 1700s 4 5 Giovanni Leonelli1, Anna Coppola2, Maria Cristina Salvatore2, Carlo Baroni2,3, Giovanna Battipaglia4,5, 6 Tiziana Gentilesca6, Francesco Ripullone6, Marco Borghetti6, Emanuele Conte7, Roberto Tognetti7, Marco 7 Marchetti7, Fabio Lombardi8, Michele Brunetti9, Maurizio Maugeri9,10, Manuela Pelfini11, Paolo 8 Cherubini12, Antonello Provenzale3, Valter Maggi1,3 9 10 1 Università degli Studi di Milano–Bicocca — Dept. of Earth and Environmental Science 11 2 Università degli Studi di Pisa — Dept. of Earth Science 12 3 Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pisa 13 4 Università della Campania — Dept. DiSTABiF 14 5 University of Montpellier 2 (France) — PALECO EPHE 15 6 Università degli Studi della Basilicata — School of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences, Potenza 16 7 Università degli Studi del Molise — Dept. of Bioscience and Territory 17 8 Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria — Dept. of Agronomy 18 9 Istituto di Scienze dell’Atmosfera e del Clima, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bologna 19 10 Università degli Studi di Milano — Dept. of Physics 20 11 Università degli Studi di Milano — Dept. of Earth Science 21 12 Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL (Switzerland) 22 Correspondence to: Giovanni Leonelli ([email protected]) 23 Abstract. A first assessment of the main climatic drivers that modulate the tree-ring width (RW) and maximum latewood 24 density (MXD) along the Italian Peninsula and northeastern Sicily was performed using 27 forest sites, which include conifers 25 (RW and MXD) and broadleaves (only RW).
    [Show full text]
  • Moüjmtaiim Operations
    L f\f¿ áfó b^i,. ‘<& t¿ ytn) ¿L0d àw 1 /1 ^ / / /This publication contains copyright material. *FM 90-6 FieW Manual HEADQUARTERS No We DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Washington, DC, 30 June 1980 MOÜJMTAIIM OPERATIONS PREFACE he purpose of this rUanual is to describe how US Army forces fight in mountain regions. Conditions will be encountered in mountains that have a significant effect on. military operations. Mountain operations require, among other things^ special equipment, special training and acclimatization, and a high decree of self-discipline if operations are to succeed. Mountains of military significance are generally characterized by rugged compartmented terrain witn\steep slopes and few natural or manmade lines of communication. Weather in these mountains is seasonal and reaches across the entireSspectrum from extreme cold, with ice and snow in most regions during me winter, to extreme heat in some regions during the summer. AlthoughNthese extremes of weather are important planning considerations, the variability of weather over a short period of time—and from locality to locahty within the confines of a small area—also significantly influences tactical operations. Historically, the focal point of mountain operations has been the battle to control the heights. Changes in weaponry and equipment have not altered this fact. In all but the most extreme conditions of terrain and weather, infantry, with its light equipment and mobility, remains the basic maneuver force in the mountains. With proper equipment and training, it is ideally suited for fighting the close-in battfe commonly associated with mountain warfare. Mechanized infantry can\also enter the mountain battle, but it must be prepared to dismount and conduct operations on foot.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Member States of the European Union and The
    CHAPTER 4 membeR StAteS oF tHe EuroPean UnioN and tHe EuroPean EcoNomic AReA 4.1 Austria ............................................. 18 4.15 Latvia .............................................. 50 4.2 belgium ........................................... 20 4.16 lithuania ......................................... 52 4.3 Cyprus ............................................. 24 4.17 luxembourg ................................... 55 4.4 Czech Republic ............................... 26 4.18 Malta ............................................... 59 4.5 denmark ......................................... 29 4.19 Netherlands ..................................... 61 4.6 estonia ............................................. 31 4.20 Norway ............................................ 64 4.7 Finland ............................................ 33 4.21 Poland .............................................. 66 4.8 France.............................................. 35 4.22 Portugal ........................................... 69 4.9 Germany ......................................... 37 4.23 Slovakia ........................................... 71 4.10 Greece .............................................. 39 4.24 Slovenia ........................................... 74 4.11 Hungary .......................................... 41 4.25 Spain ................................................ 76 4.12 Iceland ............................................. 43 4.26 Sweden ............................................. 81 4.13 Ireland ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rifugio Campo Imperatore + Center for Ecotourism and Cultural Creativity
    CAMPO IMPERATORE Center for Ecotourism + Cultural Creativity ANALYSIS, RESEARCH AND DESIGN FOR THE REQUALIFICATION OF NEGLECTED SPACES Prepared by Elsa G. De Leon ENVIRONMENT LOCATION Parco Nazionale del Gran Sasso e Monti della Laga Provincia di Terramo Urbino Provincia Marche di Pescara Abruzzo Campo L’Aquila Provincia Imperatore Lazio di Chieti Roma Campo Imperatore Parco Nazionale della Parco Nazionale Provincia Majella dell’Aquila d’Abruzzo ABRUZZO - ITALY. Italian Region. PROVINCIA DELL’AQUILA. Abruzzo Province. GRAN SASSO. National Park. CAMPO IMPERATORE. Alpine meadow. ASCOLIPICENO CULTURAL + VALUES SAN GIACOMO L’ecomuseo di Valle Castellana Ripe Valle Castellana Lago di CEPPO Campotosto L’ecomuseo di Lago di Valle Castellana Campotosto TERAMO AMATRICE CAMPOTOSTO PIETRACAMELA ISOLA DEL GRAN SASSO Arsita Prati di Tivo S. Pietro CAMPO IMPERATORE Museo del Camoscio Orto Botanico Appenninico di San Colombo FONTE VETICA FONTE CERRETO Farindola Arischia Assergi LAGO RACOLLO S. Stefano di Sessanio L’AQUILA Barisciano Calascio PARCO NAZIONALE L’Aquila Centro GRAN SASSO E MONTI DELLA LAGA Visite Fiume Tirino Bussi sul Tirino Historic Center km 0 1 2 3 4 5 km ENVIRONMENTAL + CULTURAL VALUES 150.000 3 5 44 HECTARES REGIONS PROVINCES MUNICIPALITIES BIODIVERSITY AGRO-BIODIVERSITY 51 In danger flora Cereals Solina, Farro Rosso 59 Spontaneous Orchids Legumes Lentils of Santo Stefano di Sessanio 2 Carnivorous plants Vegetables Red Potato Aromatic Plants Tansy, Customary 2364 Register Plants Fruit Trees Apples, figs, Mediterranean hack berry, almonds
    [Show full text]
  • Bare Bedrock Erosion Rates in the Central Appalachians, Virginia
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 5-2009 Bare Bedrock Erosion Rates in the Central Appalachians, Virginia Jennifer Whitten College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Whitten, Jennifer, "Bare Bedrock Erosion Rates in the Central Appalachians, Virginia" (2009). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 326. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/326 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BARE BEDROCK EROSION RATES IN THE CENTRAL APPALACHIANS, VIRGINIA A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelors of Science in Geology from The College of William and Mary by Jennifer Whitten Accepted for ___________________________________ (Honors, High Honors, Highest Honors) ________________________________________ Gregory Hancock, Director ________________________________________ Christopher Bailey ________________________________________ James Kaste ________________________________________ Scott Southworth Williamsburg, VA April 30, 2009 Table of Contents Abstract......................................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Picturing France
    Picturing France Classroom Guide VISUAL ARTS PHOTOGRAPHY ORIENTATION ART APPRECIATION STUDIO Traveling around France SOCIAL STUDIES Seeing Time and Pl ace Introduction to Color CULTURE / HISTORY PARIS GEOGRAPHY PaintingStyles GOVERNMENT / CIVICS Paris by Night Private Inve stigation LITERATURELANGUAGE / CRITICISM ARTS Casual and Formal Composition Modernizing Paris SPEAKING / WRITING Department Stores FRENCH LANGUAGE Haute Couture FONTAINEBLEAU Focus and Mo vement Painters, Politics, an d Parks MUSIC / DANCENATURAL / DRAMA SCIENCE I y Fontainebleau MATH Into the Forest ATreebyAnyOther Nam e Photograph or Painting, M. Pa scal? ÎLE-DE-FRANCE A Fore st Outing Think L ike a Salon Juror Form Your Own Ava nt-Garde The Flo ating Studio AUVERGNE/ On the River FRANCHE-COMTÉ Stream of Con sciousness Cheese! Mountains of Fra nce Volcanoes in France? NORMANDY “I Cannot Pain tan Angel” Writing en Plein Air Culture Clash Do-It-Yourself Pointillist Painting BRITTANY Comparing Two Studie s Wish You W ere Here Synthétisme Creating a Moo d Celtic Culture PROVENCE Dressing the Part Regional Still Life Color and Emo tion Expressive Marks Color Collectio n Japanese Prin ts Legend o f the Château Noir The Mistral REVIEW Winds Worldwide Poster Puzzle Travelby Clue Picturing France Classroom Guide NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART, WASHINGTON page ii This Classroom Guide is a component of the Picturing France teaching packet. © 2008 Board of Trustees of the National Gallery of Art, Washington Prepared by the Division of Education, with contributions by Robyn Asleson, Elsa Bénard, Carla Brenner, Sarah Diallo, Rachel Goldberg, Leo Kasun, Amy Lewis, Donna Mann, Marjorie McMahon, Lisa Meyerowitz, Barbara Moore, Rachel Richards, Jennifer Riddell, and Paige Simpson.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedimentological Constraints on the Initial Uplift of the West Bogda Mountains in Mid-Permian
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Sedimentological constraints on the initial uplift of the West Bogda Mountains in Mid-Permian Received: 14 August 2017 Jian Wang1,2, Ying-chang Cao1,2, Xin-tong Wang1, Ke-yu Liu1,3, Zhu-kun Wang1 & Qi-song Xu1 Accepted: 9 January 2018 The Late Paleozoic is considered to be an important stage in the evolution of the Central Asian Orogenic Published: xx xx xxxx Belt (CAOB). The Bogda Mountains, a northeastern branch of the Tianshan Mountains, record the complete Paleozoic history of the Tianshan orogenic belt. The tectonic and sedimentary evolution of the west Bogda area and the timing of initial uplift of the West Bogda Mountains were investigated based on detailed sedimentological study of outcrops, including lithology, sedimentary structures, rock and isotopic compositions and paleocurrent directions. At the end of the Early Permian, the West Bogda Trough was closed and an island arc was formed. The sedimentary and subsidence center of the Middle Permian inherited that of the Early Permian. The west Bogda area became an inherited catchment area, and developed a widespread shallow, deep and then shallow lacustrine succession during the Mid- Permian. At the end of the Mid-Permian, strong intracontinental collision caused the initial uplift of the West Bogda Mountains. Sedimentological evidence further confrmed that the West Bogda Mountains was a rift basin in the Carboniferous-Early Permian, and subsequently entered the Late Paleozoic large- scale intracontinental orogeny in the region. The Central Asia Orogenic Belt (CAOB) is the largest accretionary orogen on Earth, which was formed by the amalgamation of multiple micro-continents, island arcs and accretionary wedges1–5.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling the Snow Cover of Dome C (Antarctica) with SNOWPACK
    Modelling the snow cover of Dome C (Antarctica) with SNOWPACK January 2008 ARPAV Dipartimento Regionale per la Sicurezza del Territorio Servizio Centro Valanghe di Arabba Responsabile: Dr Francesco Sommavilla Realizzazione Franziska Stössel, Christine Groot Zwaaftink, Charles Fierz and Michael Lehning WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland Collaborazioni Dr Anselmo Cagnati Dr Andrea Crepaz P.M. Mauro Valt CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 5 2 POLAR SNOW COVER: REVIEW DIGEST................................................................................ 5 2.1 Models used for the modelling of polar snow.................................................................5 2.2 Antarctica..............................................................................................................................5 2.2.1 Modelling temperature variations in polar snow using DAISY. (Morris and others, 1997) ............................................................................................................................... 5 2.2.2 Modelling mass and energy exchange over polar snow using the daisy model. (Morris and others, 1994)............................................................................................................ 6 2.2.3 Numerical modeling of snow cover over polar ice sheets. (Dang and others, 1997).... 6 2.2.4 Impact of snow drift on the Antarctic ice sheet surface mass balance:
    [Show full text]
  • SNOWCRAFT and AVALANCHES. Gerald Seligman
    • . SNOWCRAFT AND AVALANCHES energy and we regained our sleeping qu.arters. after twelve hours. By British standards the climb might be classed just ' very difficult., Apart from these two climbs I was only able to take part in two other 'big expeditions : a second traverse of the Corno Piccolo S. ridge led by one of the L.R.D.G. and the ascent of Torrione Cambi by the -Camino Iannetta and central peak of the Corno Grande, led by J ames Joyce. This was our last expedition and to me at all events it was severe. The route followed the s. face of the Corno Grande to the Forchetta del Ca:lderone. Here the serious work started and the ·next 300 ft. took fo~r hours. The lower part of the chimney ·was ·steep ice up which steps had to be cut. Hal~way up the gradient ·eased off to be followed by a perpendicular, if not overhanging section. 'This latter part was severe. From the summit of the Torrione Cambi the central summit was gained quite easily. For th~ descent we roped =down using a very rickety piton _for the bottom section. · · _There are many other magnificent ~limbs in this area: the traverse of all three peaks of the Corno Grande done by Douglas Side, E. toW., in fourteen hours from the hotel ~ . the Tre Spalle or W. ridge of the ~ Corno ·Piccolo which was done twice, I think, by James Joyce­ probably one of the finest climbs in the district ; 8 .S .E. arete of the :Corno Grande which should only be attempted under summer condi­ tions and defeated a strong American party, and many more climbs of all shades of difficulty.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Frosts Reduce Flower Bud Survival in High-Mountain Plants
    plants Article Winter Frosts Reduce Flower Bud Survival in High-Mountain Plants Johanna Wagner *, Karla Gruber, Ursula Ladinig, Othmar Buchner and Gilbert Neuner * Department of Botany, Functional Plant Biology, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestrasse 15, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria; [email protected] (K.G.); [email protected] (U.L.); [email protected] (O.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.W.); [email protected] (G.N.); Tel.: +43-512-507-51026 (G.N.) Abstract: At higher elevations in the European Alps, plants may experience winter temperatures of −30 ◦C and lower at snow-free sites. Vegetative organs are usually sufficiently frost hardy to survive such low temperatures, but it is largely unknown if this also applies to generative structures. We investigated winter frost effects on flower buds in the cushion plants Saxifraga bryoides L. (subnival- nival) and Saxifraga moschata Wulfen (alpine-nival) growing at differently exposed sites, and the chionophilous cryptophyte Ranunculus glacialis L. (subnival-nival). Potted plants were subjected to short-time (ST) and long-time (LT) freezing between −10 and −30 ◦C in temperature-controlled freezers. Frost damage, ice nucleation and flowering frequency in summer were determined. Flower bud viability and flowering frequency decreased significantly with decreasing temperature and exposure time in both saxifrages. Already, −10 ◦C LT-freezing caused the first injuries. Below −20 ◦C, the mean losses were 47% (ST) and 75% (LT) in S. bryoides, and 19% (ST) and 38% (LT) in S. moschata. Winter buds of both saxifrages did not supercool, suggesting that damages were caused by freeze dehydration.
    [Show full text]
  • CORDEX Regional Climate Models
    1 Future snowfall in the Alps: Projections based on the EURO- 2 CORDEX regional climate models 3 Prisco Frei, Sven Kotlarski, Mark A. Liniger, Christoph Schär 4 5 6 - Response to Referees – 7 8 General 9 We thank the three referees for their careful revision of the manuscript and for their constructive comments. 10 Please find below our replies to all major comments and our suggestions on how to address these issues in a 11 revised manuscript. We hope that we satisfactorily addressed all referee comments and that the proposed 12 changes are considered as being appropriate. In case that not, we’d be looking forward to discuss individual 13 remaining issues in more detail. 14 As several referee comments addressed the RCM evaluation and the evaluation of the 2 km snowfall reference 15 itself, we’d like to put in front the following two statements on the scope of the paper: 16 17 (1) Our work is primarily concerned with the analysis of future snowfall projections. However, a basic notion on 18 the quality of raw RCM snowfall and, hence, the general ability of RCMs to represent our variable of interest is 19 required for such an exercise in our opinion. In the manuscript this is accomplished by comparing RCM raw 20 snowfall against site-scale measurements obtained from new snow sums (Figure 3). Such a comparison is 21 subject to considerable uncertainties, mostly originating from the scale gap between RCM grid cells and site-scale 22 observations and from representativity issues of observed snow cover. Due to a missing high-quality 23 observational reference at the scale of the RCM resolution (in our opinion also the HISTALP dataset has its 24 shortcomings; see below) we refrain from evaluating RCM snowfall in more detail and, at least when interpreting 25 raw snowfall change signals, implicitly assume stationary model biases.
    [Show full text]