DOCSLIB.ORG

State of New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State of New Hampshire Department of Transportation STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2018 STATE OWNED BRIDGE REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT PRIORITY LIST State owned bridges ranked by a mathematic approach for rehabilitation and replacement priority. Prepared by the Bridge Management Committee Approved: 10/31/2019 Victoria F. Sheehan, Commissioner Date Effective December 31, 2018 Printed October 31, 2019 INDEX 2018 State Rehabilitation and Replacement Title Page 1 Index 2 State-Owned Red List Bridges 3 State-Owned Yellow List Bridges 4 State-Owned Bridge Condition Data by Year 5 2018 State Rehabilitation and Replacement List by Priority 6 2018 State Rehabilitation and Replacement List by Town or City 14 2018 State Rehabilitation and Replacement Bridge Summary Key 22 NH Bridge Type Key 24 2 Trend: Red List Bridge Count 145 142 143 140 140 135 136 135 133 132 130 127 127 129 State-Owned Red Count 125 120 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Year Figure 1: State-owned red list bridge count Trend: Red List Bridge Deck Area 1,200 1,100 986 1,000 968 896 876 900 849 836 809 800 771 774 700 653 600 State-Owned Red Deck Area (sq. ft. x 1,000) 500 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Year Figure 2: State-owned red list bridge deck area 3 Trend: Yellow Bridge Count ("5" and "6") 900 882 867 844 850 830 803 800 781 783 784 801 779 750 State-Owned Yellow Count 700 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Year Figure 3: State-owned yellow bridge count Trend: Yellow Bridge Deck Area ("5" and "6") 3,800 3,672 3,638 3,649 3,600 3,472 3,487 3,363 3,364 3,400 3,379 3,373 3,264 3,200 State-Owned Yellow Deck Area (sq. ft. x 1,000) 3,000 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Year Figure 4: State-owned yellow bridge deck area 4 Table 1: State-owned bridge condition data by year Red Yellow (Rating "5") Yellow (Rating "6") Green Other Year Count Area % Area Count Area % Area Count Area % Area Count Area % Area Count Area % Area # sq. ft. % # sq. ft. % # sq. ft. % # sq. ft. % # sq. ft. % 2009 127 968,325 9.8% 254 945,103 9.6% 527 2,318,523 23.6% 1189 5,535,818 56.2% 30 75,727 0.8% 2010 135 985,889 10.0% 261 972,701 9.8% 522 2,390,618 24.2% 1190 5,479,225 55.4% 27 68,644 0.7% 2011 127 895,821 8.8% 267 965,394 9.4% 517 2,398,952 23.5% 1205 5,893,012 57.7% 26 68,079 0.7% 2012 132 835,924 8.1% 271 952,706 9.2% 508 2,425,873 23.4% 1215 6,066,110 58.6% 26 68,079 0.7% 2013 136 849,486 8.2% 286 992,329 9.6% 517 2,479,406 23.9% 1192 5,997,061 57.8% 23 65,612 0.6% 2014 142 809,023 7.7% 295 1,039,999 9.9% 506 2,332,667 22.3% 1193 6,214,864 59.4% 23 65,620 0.6% 2015 143 876,373 8.3% 295 1,047,123 10.0% 535 2,440,267 23.2% 1163 6,070,395 57.8% 23 65,058 0.6% 2016 140 771,078 7.3% 300 1,152,457 11.0% 544 2,485,704 23.7% 1150 6,019,476 57.4% 24 65,679 0.6% 2017 133 773,842 7.4% 305 1,240,767 11.9% 562 2,430,909 23.4% 1136 5,891,092 56.6% 25 68,395 0.7% 2018 129 652,629 6.2% 310 1,214,023 11.5% 572 2,434,633 23.0% 1127 6,215,302 58.7% 24 66,795 0.6% Table 2: Total counts and deck areas for State-owned bridges Totals Total State-Owned Bridge Population Trends Year Total Count Total Area 2,170 10.8 # sq. ft. 2009 2127 9,843,496 2,160 10.6 2010 2135 9,897,078 2011 2142 10,221,259 2,150 10.4 2012 2152 10,348,691 * 2013 2154 10,383,895 2,140 10.2 2014 2159 10,462,174 2015 2159 10,499,216 Bridge Count 2,130 10.0 2016 2158 10,494,394 Total Bridge Count 2,120 9.8 2017 2161 10,405,005* Total Bridge Deck Area 2018 2162 10,583,383 Bridge Area Deck(millions sq. ft.) of *Portsmouth 258/128 (I-95 over Piscataqua River) was split into 2,110 9.6 three individual bridge records. The Maine approach spans 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 (approx. 140,800 square feet) are now inventoried solely in Year Maine's bridge inventory. Figure 5: State-owned bridge population trends through time 5 July 31, 2019 2018 STATE Bridge Rehab and Replace List by Priority Page 1 of 8 (based on bridge inspection data through 12/31/2018) NHDOT 2018 Priority Ad Date, or State Draft 2021- Est. Bridge Condition of Deck, Total Length (ft); Date of Most Detour From Bridge State Red List Roadway 2019-2028 Estimated Bridge Recommended Action Gross Deck RIS Cost Bridge Structure Year Modified Town / City Owner Project Facility Carried Feature Crossed Scour Condition ADT (Year) 2030 Construction Superstructure, Total Width (ft); Cost per ft2 Recent Length BRIDGE_ID Ranking Number Status Tier 10-Year Plan Maintenance and Status Area (sf) per ft2 Posting Type / Year Built No. 10-Year Plan Substructure, or Culvert No. of Spans Inspection (Miles) Sheet Schedule Cost ($Millions) Deck 8 Very Good L=1199.0 Hampton 3 - Critical during 1 235/025 NHDOT 15904 NH 1A HAMPTON RIVER 1999 2 9,466-17 2023 2023 September 5, 2023 Bridge Replacement $29.68 Superstructure 4 Poor W=33.5 40,167 $739 $350 11/8/2018 10 E-2 BAS 1984/1949 Hampton 235/025 (Seabrook-Hampton) floods Substructure 6 Satisfactory 13-span Bridge Rehabilitation Deck 4 Poor L=847.0 Lebanon, NH - CONNECTICUT 3 - Critical during BRRP Superstructure replacement 2 044/104 NHDOT 16148 I-89 NB 2012 1 20,734-17 2019 August 27, 2019 $18.18 Superstructure 5 Fair W=35.8 30,323 $600 $650 12/4/2018 1 NPR IB-C 1966 Lebanon 044/104 Hartford, VT RIVER,NECRR floods 2019 Widen to add lane Substructure 5 Fair 6-span Scour Countermeasures Bridge Rehabilitation Deck 5 Fair L=846.0 Lebanon, NH - CONNECTICUT 3 - Critical during BRRP Superstructure replacement 3 044/103 NHDOT 16148 I-89 SB 2011 1 19,960-17 2019 August 27, 2019 $17.48 Superstructure 4 Poor W=35.8 30,288 $577 $650 12/4/2018 1 NPR IB-C 1966 Lebanon 044/103 Hartford, VT RIVER,NECRR floods 2019 Widen to add lane Substructure 6 Satisfactory 6-span Scour Countermeasures Deck 1 Closed - Failing Dover L=1585.0 Tpk Bureau, 8 - Stable for Rehabilitate for use as Superstructure 1 Closed - 4 (Newington-Dover) 200/023 11238S ROAD LITTLE BAY 1979 6 0-03 2019 2020 September 8, 2020 $32.30 W=30.6 48,501 $666 $910 11/7/2018 18 BRC HT 1950/1934 Dover 200/023 NHDOT extreme flood Pedestrian/Recreational bridge Failing General Sullivan Bridge 9-span Substructure 1 Closed - Failing Deck 4 Poor L=167.0 Concord I-393,US N - Not Over 45,231-17 3 5 152/108 NHDOT 13742 I-93 2011 1 2024 2025 January 1, 2025 Bridge Replacement $21.76 Superstructure 6 Satisfactory W=93.8 15,665 $1,389 $650 11/29/2018 NPR IB-C 1981/1958 Concord 152/108 (Bow-Concord) 4,US202 Waterway 62,000-14 0 Substructure 4 Poor 2-span Deck 6 Satisfactory L=253.5 8 - Stable for New Castle-Rye NHDOT NH 1B LITTLE HARBOR 1994 3,803-17 2019 2020 January 21, 2020 Bridge Replacement Superstructure 3 Serious W=30.8 7,807 $1,038 $1,000 11/26/2018 BAS New Castle 066/071 6 066/071 16127 3 extreme flood $8.10 2 15 Tons 1975/1942 Substructure 5 Fair 6-span EAST Bridge Rehabilitation Deck 5 Fair L=471.0 Lyme, NH- CONNECTICUT 8 - Stable for HB 1817 HB 1817 7 053/112 NHDOT 14460 THETFORD 2013 4 1,729-17 January 7, 2020 Remove lead based paint & $8.70 Superstructure 4 Poor W=23.7 11,163 $779 $275 11/29/2018 6 15 Tons HT 1937 Lyme 053/112 Thetford, VT RIVER extreme flood 2020 2020 ROAD recoat Substructure 4 Poor 2-span 7 - Deck 6 Satisfactory L=533.0 Littleton, NH- CONNECTICUT SB 367 SB 367 Rehabilitate and Paint; 8 109/134 NHDOT 27711 NH 18 2014 3 Countermeasures 1,295-17 January 7, 2025 $4.00 Superstructure 4 Poor W=30.6 16,310 $245 $325 12/5/2018 10 NPR DPG 1980/1934 Littleton 109/134 Waterford, VT RIVER 2025 2025 Deck Replacement in place Substructure 4 Poor 5-span Deck 5 Fair L=74.0 Tpk Bureau, I-293,NH 8 - Stable for Manchester BLACK BROOK 2012 21,848-17 2026 2026 January 1, 2026 Bridge Replacement Superstructure 5 Fair W=41.3 3,056 $654 $650 11/8/2018 IB-C 1956 Manchester 099/066 9 099/066 NHDOT 16099 3A,TPK S 1 extreme flood $2.00 1 NPR Substructure 4 Poor 1-span Deck 3 Serious L=156.0 Concord NHRR,CONSTITUTI N - Not Over 45,231-17 0 10 150/107 NHDOT 13742 US202 2011 2 2024 2024 January 1, 2024 Bridge Replacement $5.39 Superstructure 7 Good W=81.8 12,761 $422 $910 11/29/2018 NPR IB-C 1981/1958 Concord 150/107 (Bow-Concord) ON AV.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Carroll County, New Hampshire— New County, for Carroll Needs Hazard Mapping of Flood —Scoping
    Flynn, R.H. Prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 1 —Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Carroll County, New Hampshire— Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Carroll County, New Hampshire Open-File Report 2006–1236 Open-File Report 2006–1236 U.S. Department of the Interior Printed on recycled paper U.S. Geological Survey Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Carroll County, New Hampshire By Robert H. Flynn Prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 1 Open-File Report 2006–1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Acknowledgments The author thanks Debra Foster for her assistance in contacting towns in Carroll County to obtain preliminary scoping needs information and for editing this report, Laura Hayes for her assistance in entering effective stream information for Carroll County into the WISE (Watershed Information SystEm) Scoping module, and Ann Marie Squillacci and Tina Cotton for their help in publishing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
    A River Network Publication Volume 18| Number 3 - 2008 Celebrating 40 Years: The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act by David Moryc, American Rivers & Katherine Luscher,River Network It is hereby declared to be the policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the Nation which, with their immediate environments, possess outstandingly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values, shall be preserved in free-flowing condition, and that they and their immediate environments shall be protected for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations. The Congress declares that the established national policy of dam and other construction at appropriate sections of the rivers of the United States needs to be complemented by a policy that would preserve other selected rivers or sections thereof in their free-flowing condition to protect the water quality of such rivers and to fulfill other vital national conservation purposes. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act – October 2, 1968 hat do a Snake, a Sturgeon, a Little Beaver Tuolumne River loved by John Muir, and the and a Buffalo have in common? They are Delaware, Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Rivers, all rivers protected by our federal Wild which cradled the American Revolution, are protected W and Scenic Rivers Act. On October 2, by this visionary law. And despite various myths and 1968, the Act—championed by Senator Frank Church misconceptions, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (ID)—was signed into law by President remains a powerful tool available for Lyndon Johnson. Forty years later, watershed conservationists to protect the Act protects more than 11,434 their local river.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolved by the Senate and House Of
    906 PUBLIC LAW 90-541-0CT. I, 1968 [82 STAT. Public Law 90-541 October 1, 1968 JOINT RESOLUTION [H.J. Res, 1461] Making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1969, and for other purposes. Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatimes of tlie United Continuing ap­ propriations, States of America in Congress assernbled, That clause (c) of section 1969. 102 of the joint resolution of June 29, 1968 (Public Law 90-366), is Ante, p. 475. hereby further amended by striking out "September 30, 1968" and inserting in lieu thereof "October 12, 1968". Approved October 1, 1968. Public Law 90-542 October 2, 1968 AN ACT ------[S. 119] To proYide for a Xational Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purPoses. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Wild and Scenic United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) this Act Rivers Act. may be cited as the "vVild and Scenic Rivers Act". (b) It is hereby declared to be the policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the Nation which, with their immediate environments, possess outstandin~ly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values, shall be preserved in free-flowing condition, and that they and their immediate environments shall be protected for the benefit and enjoy­ ment of l?resent and future generations. The Congress declares that the established national policy of dam and other construction at appro­ priate sections of the rivers of the United States needs to be com­ plemented by a policy that would preserve other selected rivers or sections thereof m their free-flowing condition to protect the water quality of such rivers and to fulfill other vital national conservation purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2020 Traffic Count Locations
    MUNICIPALITY LOCATION TYPE ALBANY NH 112 (KANCAMAGUS HWY) WEST OF BEAR NOTCH RD SINGLE TUBE COUNT ALBANY BEAR NOTCH RD NORTH OF KANCAMAGUS HWY DOUBLE TUBE COUNT ALBANY DRAKE HILL RD OVER CHOCORUA RIVER SINGLE TUBE COUNT ALBANY DUGWAY RD EAST OF NH 112 SINGLE TUBE COUNT ALBANY NH 112 (KANCAMAGUS HWY) OVER TWIN BROOK SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT US 302/NH 16 SOUTH OF HURRICANE MT RD AT CONWAY TL SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT US 302 (CRAWFORD NOTCH RD) EB AT STONY BROOK DOUBLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT US 302 (CRAWFORD NOTCH RD) WB AT STONY BROOK DOUBLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT ALBANY AVE AT STATE OF NH RR TRACKS SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT RIVER ST AT SACO RIVER SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT TOWN HALL RD EAST OF US 302/NH 16 SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT NH 16A OVER EAST BRANCH RIVER SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT BEAR NOTCH RD OVER DOUGLAS BROOK SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT FOSTER ST BRIDGE OVER BROOK SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT HURRICANE MOUNTAIN RD OVER HOYT BROOK SINGLE TUBE COUNT BATH US 302/NH 10 (RUM HILL RD) WEST OF NH 112 SINGLE TUBE COUNT BATH WEST BATH ROAD WEST OF STATE OF NH RR SINGLE TUBE COUNT BATH DODGE RD EAST OF PETTYBORO RD SINGLE TUBE COUNT BATH PORTER RD OVER AMMONOOSUC RIVER SINGLE TUBE COUNT BENTON TUNNEL STREAM RD OVER DAVIS BROOK SINGLE TUBE COUNT BERLIN SCHOOL ST NORTH OF MASON ST SINGLE TUBE COUNT BERLIN MOUNT FOREST ST EAST OF FIRST AVE SINGLE TUBE COUNT BERLIN EXCHANGE ST WEST OF PLEASANT ST SINGLE TUBE COUNT BERLIN YORK ST WEST OF PLEASANT ST SINGLE TUBE COUNT BERLIN MADISON AVE NORTH OF EMERY ST SINGLE TUBE COUNT BERLIN GRANITE ST BETWEEN
    [Show full text]
  • Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
    Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (P.L. 90-542, as amended) (16 U.S.C. 1271-1287) 1An Act To provide for a National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes. ********************************************************************* National Wild and Scenic River is a designation for certain protected areas in the United States. The National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act was an outgrowth of the recommendations of a Presidential commission, the Outdoor Recreation Resources Review Commission (ORRRC). Among other things, the commission recommended that the nation protect wild rivers and scenic rivers from development that would substantially change their wild or scenic nature. The act was sponsored by Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) and signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on October 2, 1968. A river or river section may be designated by the U.S. Congress or the Secretary of the Interior. As of 2004, a total of 156 rivers have wild and scenic status. Selected rivers in the United States are preserved for possessing outstandingly, remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values. Rivers, or sections of rivers, so designated are preserved in their free-flowing condition and are not dammed or otherwise improved. Designation as a wild and scenic river is not the same as designation as a national park, and does not generally does not confer the same level of protection as a Wilderness Area designation. Instead of enacting strict and mandatory conservation measures, the goal is often to preserve the character of a river. National Wild and Scenic rivers are each managed by one or more agencies of the federal or state government.
    [Show full text]
  • Carroll County, New Hampshire
    VOLUME 1 OF 2 CARROLL COUNTY, NEW HAMPSHIRE (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Carroll County Community Community Community Community Name Number Name Number ALBANY, TOWN OF 330174 JACKSON, TOWN OF 330014 BARTLETT, TOWN OF 330010 MADISON, TOWN OF 330220 BROOKFIELD, TOWN OF 330179 MOULTONBOROUGH, TOWN OF 330015 CHATHAM, TOWN OF 330181 OSSIPEE, TOWN OF 330016 CONWAY, TOWN OF 330011 SANDWICH, TOWN OF 330017 EATON, TOWN OF 330204 TAMWORTH, TOWN OF 330018 EFFINGHAM, TOWN OF 330012 TUFTONBORO, TOWN OF 330234 FREEDOM, TOWN OF 330013 WAKEFIELD, TOWN OF 330019 *HALE’S LOCATION, TOWN OF 330246 WOLFEBORO, TOWN OF 330239 HART’S LOCATION, TOWN OF 330213 *No Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified Effective: March 19, 2013 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 33003CV001A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for this community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections).
    [Show full text]
  • Missisquoi & Trout Rivers Management Plan, Vermont
    March 2013 Front Cover Photo Credits Main Photo: Missisquoi River – Dan Moriarty, courtesy of the Missisquoi River Basin Association (MRBA) First Row: John Little Paddling the Missisquoi – Ken Secor; Covered Bridge – John Selmer; Fishing the Trout – Brenda Elwood; Moose near the Hopkins Covered Bridge – Frank Wirth Second Row: Nice Buffer/Floodplain – Shana Stewart Deeds; Paddling the Missisquoi – Shana Stewart Deeds; Bakers Falls on the Missisquoi – Jonathan and Jayne Chase; Fog on the Missisquoi – Mary Alice Brenner; Behind the Monastery on the Missisquoi – Ave Leslie Inside Front Cover: Missisquoi River, Orleans County – Art Bell; flyover provided by Lakeview Aviation Back Cover Photo Credits Inside Back Cover: Missisquoi River, Franklin County – Art Bell; flyover provided by Lakeview Aviation. Back Cover: John Little’s Boat on the Trout River – Art Bell Upper Missisquoi and Trout Rivers Management Plan The Upper Missisquoi and Trout Rivers Wild and Scenic Management Plan is now available on our website (www.vtwsr.org and hard copies in the Town Clerks’ offices). This is a non- regulatory Plan summarizing the information collected over the three year study by the locally appointed Study Committee, illustrating examples of management success stories in our region, and encouraging the voluntary recommendations which the Study Committee feels will maintain the Missisquoi and Trout Rivers in healthy condition. Should designation occur, it will be based on this locally-developed Management Plan and would not involve federal acquisition or management of lands. The Upper Missisquoi and Trout Rivers Wild and Scenic Study Committee is pleased to present its Management Plan for the upper Missisquoi and Trout Rivers for community review.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 18/Monday, January 28, 2013/Rules and Regulations
    5738 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations Date certain Federal assist- State and location Community Effective date authorization/cancellation of Current effective ance no longer No. sale of flood insurance in community map date available in SFHAs Braselton, Town of, Barrow, Gwinnett 130343 August 12, 1991, Emerg; September 29, ......do ............... Do. and Hall Counties. 2006, Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Buford, City of, Gwinnett and Hall 130323 N/A, Emerg; May 22, 1995, Reg; March 4, ......do ............... Do. Counties. 2013, Susp. Cumming, City of, Forsyth County ........ 130236 July 23, 1975, Emerg; August 1, 1986, Reg; ......do ............... Do. March 4, 2013, Susp. Douglas County, Unincorporated Areas 130306 January 31, 1975, Emerg; January 2, 1980, ......do ............... Do. Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Douglasville, City of, Douglas County ... 130305 August 22, 1979, Emerg; June 25, 1982, ......do ............... Do. Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Duluth, City of, Gwinnett County ........... 130098 December 17, 1975, Emerg; June 1, 1981, ......do ............... Do. Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Forsyth County, Unincorporated Areas 130312 April 12, 1977, Emerg; July 4, 1989, Reg; ......do ............... Do. March 4, 2013, Susp. Gwinnett County, Unincorporated Areas 130322 April 9, 1975, Emerg; June 15, 1981, Reg; ......do ............... Do. March 4, 2013, Susp. Norcross, City of, Gwinnett County ....... 130101 October 24, 1974, Emerg; May 1, 1980, ......do ............... Do. Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Sugar Hill, City of, Gwinnett County ..... 130474 September 30, 1998, Emerg; September ......do ............... Do. 29, 2006, Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Suwanee, City of, Gwinnett County ...... 130328 September 22, 1980, Emerg; June 1, 1981, ......do ..............
    [Show full text]
  • Carroll County, New Hampshire
    VOLUME 1 OF 2 CARROLL COUNTY, NEW HAMPSHIRE (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Carroll County Community Community Community Community Name Number Name Number ALBANY, TOWN OF 330174 JACKSON, TOWN OF 330014 BARTLETT, TOWN OF 330010 MADISON, TOWN OF 330220 BROOKFIELD, TOWN OF 330179 MOULTONBOROUGH, TOWN OF 330015 CHATHAM, TOWN OF 330181 OSSIPEE, TOWN OF 330016 CONWAY, TOWN OF 330011 SANDWICH, TOWN OF 330017 EATON, TOWN OF 330204 TAMWORTH, TOWN OF 330018 EFFINGHAM, TOWN OF 330012 TUFTONBORO, TOWN OF 330234 FREEDOM, TOWN OF 330013 WAKEFIELD, TOWN OF 330019 *HALE’S LOCATION, TOWN OF 330246 WOLFEBORO, TOWN OF 330239 HART’S LOCATION, TOWN OF 330213 *No Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified Preliminary: April 29, 2011 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 33003CV001A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for this community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections).
    [Show full text]
  • Wildcat Brook
    Wildcat Brook Wild and Scenic River Study Jackson, New Hampshire DRAFT REPORT February, 1988 North Atlantic Regional Office National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service This report was prepared pursuant to Public Law 90-542. the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, as amended. Publication of the findings and conclusions herein should not be construed as representing either the approval or disapproval of the Secretary of the Interior. The purpose of this report is to provide the information and alternatives for further considera­ tion by the National Park Service, the Secretary of the Interior, and other federal and state agencies. This report also serves as an Interim Report to Congress as called for in the Public Law. The Wildcat River in Jackson, New Hampshire is often popularly identified as "Wildcat Brook" in publications, maps and the media. Except where otherwise noted, this Draft Report also refers to the main stem of the river as Wildcat Brook. TABLE OF CONTENTS ~ I. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 1 II. BACKGROUNDANDSTATUSOFTHESTUDY 9 III. RESOURCE ASSESSMENT 15 N. RIVER CONSERVATION PLAN 27 v. ALTERNATIVES FOR RIVER PROTECTION 37 VI. APPENDICES 45 VII. BIBLIOGRAPHY 47 VIII. STUDY PARTICIPANTS 57 Summary of Findings BEANS PURCHASE • Wildcat River SACO RIVER BA'>L'I 0 5 MILES Orientation Map . =._. --,_, f'ti u•~ 0 -·--- """W,. ::;-;;,:;;_:. ' ---- ...~ -- .":. ' ORTHCONWAYN"W.NH-ME --1---._____ ..... _,.. __ _,..,._ ,._ I -~""..,..,' _____ -- .., -- i:--:i--~, ,__ --- ~ __ 23 ___ _ --- lJCl-·- •".0._u_....,. .... _.,..,.._, ,_ _.., I. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS In 1982 the National Park Service published the Nationwide Rivers Inventory, which systematically identified and evaluated rivers that would meet the minimum criteria for further study and/or potential inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.
    [Show full text]
  • Then and Now USVLT Turns 20
    Then and Now USVLT Turns 20 Peter Benson Interviewed by Meghan Moody Upper Saco Valley Land Trust (and recently rejoined Board member) the side of the road, and everyone knew achieved its 20th anniversary on Peter Benson. where it was. It was fantastic. There September 15th, 2020, a remarkable “When you are in the start of was no way that a larger organization milestone. Over the past two decades, something, you don’t know what the was going to take on a project of its size the organization has conserved more future holds,” Peter said. “We were very at the time. Everything really took off than 12,000 acres. No one, including intentional in developing the Land from there.” USVLT’s founders, could have predicted Trust, but I don’t think anyone could USVLT has continued to fill this how those conservation victories have have guessed where this was going local void within the conservation added up, nor the upheaval 2020 has to go.” Peter used the organization’s community ever since. Some projects delivered. Especially with this year’s first project, the Harding Easement that Peter helped start in the 90’s have increased demand for trails and open in Jackson, as an example of how the only been finalized since he returned to space, for recreational and spiritual group had a much more organic and the Board. Peter smiled and said, “The purposes alike, USVLT’s achievements home-grown approach to conservation. seeds that you plant sometimes can seem more important than ever. To “We just went there, it was 12 acres, saw take a while to germinate, but they do honor the occasion, we asked new that it was beautiful and had a ski trail come up.” He added that there has been Board member Meghan Moody to on it, and said, ‘Sure, why not?’” Peter a shift over the past two decades, as interview Land Trust founding member continued, “It was high-profile, right on some land owners have become much —continued on page 3 Photo: Mike Dana Mike Photo: “Nature is not a place to visit.
    [Show full text]
  • Probabilistic Assessment of Wadeable Rivers and Streams
    MASSACHUSETTS PROBABILISTIC MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM ASSESSMENT OF WADEABLE RIVERS AND STREAMS 2011-2015 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS KATHLEEN A. THEOHARIDES, SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MARTIN SUUBERG, COMMISSIONER BUREAU OF WATER RESOURCES KATHLEEN BASKIN, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER September 25, 2020 Cover Photo: Ashley Hill Brook in Mt. Washington, MA (MassDEP) Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................5 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................6 Survey Design ................................................................................................................................................6 Site Evaluation ...............................................................................................................................................7 Monitoring Design .......................................................................................................................................10 Sampling Plan ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 Field and Analytical Methods .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]