DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 18/Monday, January 28, 2013/Rules and Regulations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 18/Monday, January 28, 2013/Rules and Regulations 5738 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations Date certain Federal assist- State and location Community Effective date authorization/cancellation of Current effective ance no longer No. sale of flood insurance in community map date available in SFHAs Braselton, Town of, Barrow, Gwinnett 130343 August 12, 1991, Emerg; September 29, ......do ............... Do. and Hall Counties. 2006, Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Buford, City of, Gwinnett and Hall 130323 N/A, Emerg; May 22, 1995, Reg; March 4, ......do ............... Do. Counties. 2013, Susp. Cumming, City of, Forsyth County ........ 130236 July 23, 1975, Emerg; August 1, 1986, Reg; ......do ............... Do. March 4, 2013, Susp. Douglas County, Unincorporated Areas 130306 January 31, 1975, Emerg; January 2, 1980, ......do ............... Do. Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Douglasville, City of, Douglas County ... 130305 August 22, 1979, Emerg; June 25, 1982, ......do ............... Do. Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Duluth, City of, Gwinnett County ........... 130098 December 17, 1975, Emerg; June 1, 1981, ......do ............... Do. Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Forsyth County, Unincorporated Areas 130312 April 12, 1977, Emerg; July 4, 1989, Reg; ......do ............... Do. March 4, 2013, Susp. Gwinnett County, Unincorporated Areas 130322 April 9, 1975, Emerg; June 15, 1981, Reg; ......do ............... Do. March 4, 2013, Susp. Norcross, City of, Gwinnett County ....... 130101 October 24, 1974, Emerg; May 1, 1980, ......do ............... Do. Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Sugar Hill, City of, Gwinnett County ..... 130474 September 30, 1998, Emerg; September ......do ............... Do. 29, 2006, Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Suwanee, City of, Gwinnett County ...... 130328 September 22, 1980, Emerg; June 1, 1981, ......do ............... Do. Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Region V Indiana: Farmland, Town of, Randolph County .. 180390 April 22, 1977, Emerg; July 3, 1985, Reg; ......do ............... Do. March 4, 2013, Susp. Parker City, Town of, Randolph County 180391 April 20, 1976, Emerg; January 3, 1985, ......do ............... Do. Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Randolph County, Unincorporated 180429 January 16, 1976, Emerg; May 1, 1987, ......do ............... Do. Areas. Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Ridgeville, Town of, Randolph County .. 180341 August 20, 1975, Emerg; July 18, 1985, ......do ............... Do. Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Union City, City of, Randolph County ... 180219 May 5, 1975, Emerg; September 29, 1986, ......do ............... Do. Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Winchester, City of, Randolph County.. 180220 March 10, 1975, Emerg; September 4, ......do ............... Do. 1985, Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Minnesota: Foreston, City of, Mille Lacs County ..... 270287 September 16, 1975, Emerg; September ......do ............... Do. 27, 1985, Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Isle, City of, Mille Lacs County .............. 270288 May 16, 1974, Emerg; November 1, 1979, ......do ............... Do. Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Milaca, City of, Mille Lacs County ......... 270289 May 9, 1974, Emerg; May 5, 1981, Reg; ......do ............... Do. March 4, 2013, Susp. Mille Lacs County, Unincorporated 270624 April 15, 1974, Emerg; September 27, ......do ............... Do. Areas. 1985, Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Onamia, City of, Mille Lacs County ....... 270290 November 21, 1974, Emerg; September 18, ......do ............... Do. 1985, Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Princeton, City of, Mille Lacs County .... 270292 July 2, 1974, Emerg; June 15, 1981, Reg; ......do ............... Do. March 4, 2013, Susp. * -do- = Ditto. Code for reading third column: Emerg.—Emergency; Reg.—Regular; Susp.—Suspension. Dated: January 15, 2013. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SUMMARY: Base (1% annual-chance) David L. Miller, SECURITY Flood Elevations (BFEs) and modified Associate Administrator, Federal Insurance BFEs are made final for the and Mitigation Administration, Department Federal Emergency Management communities listed below. The BFEs of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Agency and modified BFEs are the basis for the Management Agency. floodplain management measures that [FR Doc. 2013–01624 Filed 1–25–13; 8:45 am] 44 CFR Part 67 each community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of being BILLING CODE 9110–12–P [Docket ID FEMA–2013–0002] already in effect in order to qualify or Final Flood Elevation Determinations remain qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program AGENCY: Federal Emergency (NFIP). Management Agency, DHS. DATES: The date of issuance of the Flood ACTION: Final rule. Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) showing VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:13 Jan 25, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\28JAR1.SGM 28JAR1 pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 5739 BFEs and modified BFEs for each This final rule is issued in accordance 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, community. This date may be obtained with section 110 of the Flood Disaster 58 FR 51735. by contacting the office where the maps Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, Executive Order 13132, Federalism. are available for inspection as indicated and 44 CFR part 67. FEMA has This final rule involves no policies that in the table below. developed criteria for floodplain have federalism implications under ADDRESSES: The final BFEs for each management in floodprone areas in Executive Order 13132. community are available for inspection accordance with 44 CFR part 60. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice at the office of the Chief Executive Interested lessees and owners of real Reform. This final rule meets the Officer of each community. The property are encouraged to review the applicable standards of Executive Order respective addresses are listed in the proof Flood Insurance Study and FIRM 12988. table below. available at the address cited below for List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 67 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis each community. The BFEs and Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering modified BFEs are made final in the Administrative practice and Management Branch, Federal Insurance communities listed below. Elevations at procedure, Flood insurance, Reporting and Mitigation Administration, Federal selected locations in each community and recordkeeping requirements. Emergency Management Agency, 500 C are shown. Accordingly, 44 CFR part 67 is Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, National Environmental Policy Act. amended as follows: (202) 646–4064, or (email) This final rule is categorically excluded [email protected]. from the requirements of 44 CFR part PART 67—[AMENDED] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 10, Environmental Consideration. An Federal Emergency Management Agency environmental impact assessment has ■ 1. The authority citation for part 67 (FEMA) makes the final determinations not been prepared. continues to read as follows: listed below for the modified BFEs for Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; each community listed. These modified elevation determinations are not within Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR, elevations have been published in the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, newspapers of local circulation and Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, a regulatory 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376. ninety (90) days have elapsed since that flexibility analysis is not required. § 67.11 [Amended] publication. The Deputy Associate Regulatory Classification. This final Administrator for Mitigation has rule is not a significant regulatory action ■ 2. The tables published under the resolved any appeals resulting from this under the criteria of section 3(f) of authority of § 67.11 are amended as notification. Executive Order 12866 of September 30, follows: * Elevation in feet (NGVD) + Elevation in feet (NAVD) State City/town/county Source of flooding Location # Depth in feet above ground ∧ Elevation in me- ters (MSL) Modified Unincorporated Areas of Cascade County, Montana Docket No.: FEMA–B–1214 Montana ........................ Unincorporated Areas Missouri River (near Mid Approximately 200 feet upstream of I–15 +3433 of Cascade County. Canon). (westbound). Approximately 1.2 miles upstream of I–15 +3440 (eastbound). * National Geodetic Vertical Datum. + North American Vertical Datum. # Depth in feet above ground. ∧ Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter. ADDRESSES Unincorporated Areas of Cascade County Maps are available for inspection at 121 4th Street North, Suites 2H–2I, Great Falls, MT 59401. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:13 Jan 25, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\28JAR1.SGM 28JAR1 pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with 5740 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations * Elevation in feet (NGVD) + Elevation in feet (NAVD) Flooding source(s) Location of referenced elevation # Depth in feet Communities affected above ground ∧ Elevation in meters (MSL) Effective Modified Trigg County, Kentucky, and Incorporated Areas Docket No.: FEMA–B–1115 and B–1207 Barnett Creek (Backwater ef- From the confluence with Kentucky Lake to approximately +375 Unincorporated Areas of fects from Kentucky Lake). 2,324 feet upstream of the confluence with Kentucky Trigg County. Lake. Beechy Fork (Backwater effects From the confluence with Lake Barkley to approximately +375 Unincorporated Areas of from Lake Barkley). 0.75 mile upstream of the confluence with Lake Barkley. Trigg County.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Official List of Public Waters
    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Carroll County, New Hampshire— New County, for Carroll Needs Hazard Mapping of Flood —Scoping
    Flynn, R.H. Prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 1 —Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Carroll County, New Hampshire— Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Carroll County, New Hampshire Open-File Report 2006–1236 Open-File Report 2006–1236 U.S. Department of the Interior Printed on recycled paper U.S. Geological Survey Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Carroll County, New Hampshire By Robert H. Flynn Prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 1 Open-File Report 2006–1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Acknowledgments The author thanks Debra Foster for her assistance in contacting towns in Carroll County to obtain preliminary scoping needs information and for editing this report, Laura Hayes for her assistance in entering effective stream information for Carroll County into the WISE (Watershed Information SystEm) Scoping module, and Ann Marie Squillacci and Tina Cotton for their help in publishing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
    A River Network Publication Volume 18| Number 3 - 2008 Celebrating 40 Years: The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act by David Moryc, American Rivers & Katherine Luscher,River Network It is hereby declared to be the policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the Nation which, with their immediate environments, possess outstandingly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values, shall be preserved in free-flowing condition, and that they and their immediate environments shall be protected for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations. The Congress declares that the established national policy of dam and other construction at appropriate sections of the rivers of the United States needs to be complemented by a policy that would preserve other selected rivers or sections thereof in their free-flowing condition to protect the water quality of such rivers and to fulfill other vital national conservation purposes. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act – October 2, 1968 hat do a Snake, a Sturgeon, a Little Beaver Tuolumne River loved by John Muir, and the and a Buffalo have in common? They are Delaware, Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Rivers, all rivers protected by our federal Wild which cradled the American Revolution, are protected W and Scenic Rivers Act. On October 2, by this visionary law. And despite various myths and 1968, the Act—championed by Senator Frank Church misconceptions, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (ID)—was signed into law by President remains a powerful tool available for Lyndon Johnson. Forty years later, watershed conservationists to protect the Act protects more than 11,434 their local river.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolved by the Senate and House Of
    906 PUBLIC LAW 90-541-0CT. I, 1968 [82 STAT. Public Law 90-541 October 1, 1968 JOINT RESOLUTION [H.J. Res, 1461] Making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1969, and for other purposes. Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatimes of tlie United Continuing ap­ propriations, States of America in Congress assernbled, That clause (c) of section 1969. 102 of the joint resolution of June 29, 1968 (Public Law 90-366), is Ante, p. 475. hereby further amended by striking out "September 30, 1968" and inserting in lieu thereof "October 12, 1968". Approved October 1, 1968. Public Law 90-542 October 2, 1968 AN ACT ------[S. 119] To proYide for a Xational Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purPoses. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Wild and Scenic United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) this Act Rivers Act. may be cited as the "vVild and Scenic Rivers Act". (b) It is hereby declared to be the policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the Nation which, with their immediate environments, possess outstandin~ly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values, shall be preserved in free-flowing condition, and that they and their immediate environments shall be protected for the benefit and enjoy­ ment of l?resent and future generations. The Congress declares that the established national policy of dam and other construction at appro­ priate sections of the rivers of the United States needs to be com­ plemented by a policy that would preserve other selected rivers or sections thereof m their free-flowing condition to protect the water quality of such rivers and to fulfill other vital national conservation purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2020 Traffic Count Locations
    MUNICIPALITY LOCATION TYPE ALBANY NH 112 (KANCAMAGUS HWY) WEST OF BEAR NOTCH RD SINGLE TUBE COUNT ALBANY BEAR NOTCH RD NORTH OF KANCAMAGUS HWY DOUBLE TUBE COUNT ALBANY DRAKE HILL RD OVER CHOCORUA RIVER SINGLE TUBE COUNT ALBANY DUGWAY RD EAST OF NH 112 SINGLE TUBE COUNT ALBANY NH 112 (KANCAMAGUS HWY) OVER TWIN BROOK SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT US 302/NH 16 SOUTH OF HURRICANE MT RD AT CONWAY TL SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT US 302 (CRAWFORD NOTCH RD) EB AT STONY BROOK DOUBLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT US 302 (CRAWFORD NOTCH RD) WB AT STONY BROOK DOUBLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT ALBANY AVE AT STATE OF NH RR TRACKS SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT RIVER ST AT SACO RIVER SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT TOWN HALL RD EAST OF US 302/NH 16 SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT NH 16A OVER EAST BRANCH RIVER SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT BEAR NOTCH RD OVER DOUGLAS BROOK SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT FOSTER ST BRIDGE OVER BROOK SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT HURRICANE MOUNTAIN RD OVER HOYT BROOK SINGLE TUBE COUNT BATH US 302/NH 10 (RUM HILL RD) WEST OF NH 112 SINGLE TUBE COUNT BATH WEST BATH ROAD WEST OF STATE OF NH RR SINGLE TUBE COUNT BATH DODGE RD EAST OF PETTYBORO RD SINGLE TUBE COUNT BATH PORTER RD OVER AMMONOOSUC RIVER SINGLE TUBE COUNT BENTON TUNNEL STREAM RD OVER DAVIS BROOK SINGLE TUBE COUNT BERLIN SCHOOL ST NORTH OF MASON ST SINGLE TUBE COUNT BERLIN MOUNT FOREST ST EAST OF FIRST AVE SINGLE TUBE COUNT BERLIN EXCHANGE ST WEST OF PLEASANT ST SINGLE TUBE COUNT BERLIN YORK ST WEST OF PLEASANT ST SINGLE TUBE COUNT BERLIN MADISON AVE NORTH OF EMERY ST SINGLE TUBE COUNT BERLIN GRANITE ST BETWEEN
    [Show full text]
  • Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
    Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (P.L. 90-542, as amended) (16 U.S.C. 1271-1287) 1An Act To provide for a National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes. ********************************************************************* National Wild and Scenic River is a designation for certain protected areas in the United States. The National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act was an outgrowth of the recommendations of a Presidential commission, the Outdoor Recreation Resources Review Commission (ORRRC). Among other things, the commission recommended that the nation protect wild rivers and scenic rivers from development that would substantially change their wild or scenic nature. The act was sponsored by Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) and signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on October 2, 1968. A river or river section may be designated by the U.S. Congress or the Secretary of the Interior. As of 2004, a total of 156 rivers have wild and scenic status. Selected rivers in the United States are preserved for possessing outstandingly, remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values. Rivers, or sections of rivers, so designated are preserved in their free-flowing condition and are not dammed or otherwise improved. Designation as a wild and scenic river is not the same as designation as a national park, and does not generally does not confer the same level of protection as a Wilderness Area designation. Instead of enacting strict and mandatory conservation measures, the goal is often to preserve the character of a river. National Wild and Scenic rivers are each managed by one or more agencies of the federal or state government.
    [Show full text]
  • Carroll County, New Hampshire
    VOLUME 1 OF 2 CARROLL COUNTY, NEW HAMPSHIRE (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Carroll County Community Community Community Community Name Number Name Number ALBANY, TOWN OF 330174 JACKSON, TOWN OF 330014 BARTLETT, TOWN OF 330010 MADISON, TOWN OF 330220 BROOKFIELD, TOWN OF 330179 MOULTONBOROUGH, TOWN OF 330015 CHATHAM, TOWN OF 330181 OSSIPEE, TOWN OF 330016 CONWAY, TOWN OF 330011 SANDWICH, TOWN OF 330017 EATON, TOWN OF 330204 TAMWORTH, TOWN OF 330018 EFFINGHAM, TOWN OF 330012 TUFTONBORO, TOWN OF 330234 FREEDOM, TOWN OF 330013 WAKEFIELD, TOWN OF 330019 *HALE’S LOCATION, TOWN OF 330246 WOLFEBORO, TOWN OF 330239 HART’S LOCATION, TOWN OF 330213 *No Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified Effective: March 19, 2013 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 33003CV001A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for this community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections).
    [Show full text]
  • Missisquoi & Trout Rivers Management Plan, Vermont
    March 2013 Front Cover Photo Credits Main Photo: Missisquoi River – Dan Moriarty, courtesy of the Missisquoi River Basin Association (MRBA) First Row: John Little Paddling the Missisquoi – Ken Secor; Covered Bridge – John Selmer; Fishing the Trout – Brenda Elwood; Moose near the Hopkins Covered Bridge – Frank Wirth Second Row: Nice Buffer/Floodplain – Shana Stewart Deeds; Paddling the Missisquoi – Shana Stewart Deeds; Bakers Falls on the Missisquoi – Jonathan and Jayne Chase; Fog on the Missisquoi – Mary Alice Brenner; Behind the Monastery on the Missisquoi – Ave Leslie Inside Front Cover: Missisquoi River, Orleans County – Art Bell; flyover provided by Lakeview Aviation Back Cover Photo Credits Inside Back Cover: Missisquoi River, Franklin County – Art Bell; flyover provided by Lakeview Aviation. Back Cover: John Little’s Boat on the Trout River – Art Bell Upper Missisquoi and Trout Rivers Management Plan The Upper Missisquoi and Trout Rivers Wild and Scenic Management Plan is now available on our website (www.vtwsr.org and hard copies in the Town Clerks’ offices). This is a non- regulatory Plan summarizing the information collected over the three year study by the locally appointed Study Committee, illustrating examples of management success stories in our region, and encouraging the voluntary recommendations which the Study Committee feels will maintain the Missisquoi and Trout Rivers in healthy condition. Should designation occur, it will be based on this locally-developed Management Plan and would not involve federal acquisition or management of lands. The Upper Missisquoi and Trout Rivers Wild and Scenic Study Committee is pleased to present its Management Plan for the upper Missisquoi and Trout Rivers for community review.
    [Show full text]
  • Carroll County, New Hampshire
    VOLUME 1 OF 2 CARROLL COUNTY, NEW HAMPSHIRE (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Carroll County Community Community Community Community Name Number Name Number ALBANY, TOWN OF 330174 JACKSON, TOWN OF 330014 BARTLETT, TOWN OF 330010 MADISON, TOWN OF 330220 BROOKFIELD, TOWN OF 330179 MOULTONBOROUGH, TOWN OF 330015 CHATHAM, TOWN OF 330181 OSSIPEE, TOWN OF 330016 CONWAY, TOWN OF 330011 SANDWICH, TOWN OF 330017 EATON, TOWN OF 330204 TAMWORTH, TOWN OF 330018 EFFINGHAM, TOWN OF 330012 TUFTONBORO, TOWN OF 330234 FREEDOM, TOWN OF 330013 WAKEFIELD, TOWN OF 330019 *HALE’S LOCATION, TOWN OF 330246 WOLFEBORO, TOWN OF 330239 HART’S LOCATION, TOWN OF 330213 *No Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified Preliminary: April 29, 2011 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 33003CV001A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for this community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections).
    [Show full text]
  • Wildcat Brook
    Wildcat Brook Wild and Scenic River Study Jackson, New Hampshire DRAFT REPORT February, 1988 North Atlantic Regional Office National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service This report was prepared pursuant to Public Law 90-542. the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, as amended. Publication of the findings and conclusions herein should not be construed as representing either the approval or disapproval of the Secretary of the Interior. The purpose of this report is to provide the information and alternatives for further considera­ tion by the National Park Service, the Secretary of the Interior, and other federal and state agencies. This report also serves as an Interim Report to Congress as called for in the Public Law. The Wildcat River in Jackson, New Hampshire is often popularly identified as "Wildcat Brook" in publications, maps and the media. Except where otherwise noted, this Draft Report also refers to the main stem of the river as Wildcat Brook. TABLE OF CONTENTS ~ I. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 1 II. BACKGROUNDANDSTATUSOFTHESTUDY 9 III. RESOURCE ASSESSMENT 15 N. RIVER CONSERVATION PLAN 27 v. ALTERNATIVES FOR RIVER PROTECTION 37 VI. APPENDICES 45 VII. BIBLIOGRAPHY 47 VIII. STUDY PARTICIPANTS 57 Summary of Findings BEANS PURCHASE • Wildcat River SACO RIVER BA'>L'I 0 5 MILES Orientation Map . =._. --,_, f'ti u•~ 0 -·--- """W,. ::;-;;,:;;_:. ' ---- ...~ -- .":. ' ORTHCONWAYN"W.NH-ME --1---._____ ..... _,.. __ _,..,._ ,._ I -~""..,..,' _____ -- .., -- i:--:i--~, ,__ --- ~ __ 23 ___ _ --- lJCl-·- •".0._u_....,. .... _.,..,.._, ,_ _.., I. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS In 1982 the National Park Service published the Nationwide Rivers Inventory, which systematically identified and evaluated rivers that would meet the minimum criteria for further study and/or potential inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.
    [Show full text]
  • Then and Now USVLT Turns 20
    Then and Now USVLT Turns 20 Peter Benson Interviewed by Meghan Moody Upper Saco Valley Land Trust (and recently rejoined Board member) the side of the road, and everyone knew achieved its 20th anniversary on Peter Benson. where it was. It was fantastic. There September 15th, 2020, a remarkable “When you are in the start of was no way that a larger organization milestone. Over the past two decades, something, you don’t know what the was going to take on a project of its size the organization has conserved more future holds,” Peter said. “We were very at the time. Everything really took off than 12,000 acres. No one, including intentional in developing the Land from there.” USVLT’s founders, could have predicted Trust, but I don’t think anyone could USVLT has continued to fill this how those conservation victories have have guessed where this was going local void within the conservation added up, nor the upheaval 2020 has to go.” Peter used the organization’s community ever since. Some projects delivered. Especially with this year’s first project, the Harding Easement that Peter helped start in the 90’s have increased demand for trails and open in Jackson, as an example of how the only been finalized since he returned to space, for recreational and spiritual group had a much more organic and the Board. Peter smiled and said, “The purposes alike, USVLT’s achievements home-grown approach to conservation. seeds that you plant sometimes can seem more important than ever. To “We just went there, it was 12 acres, saw take a while to germinate, but they do honor the occasion, we asked new that it was beautiful and had a ski trail come up.” He added that there has been Board member Meghan Moody to on it, and said, ‘Sure, why not?’” Peter a shift over the past two decades, as interview Land Trust founding member continued, “It was high-profile, right on some land owners have become much —continued on page 3 Photo: Mike Dana Mike Photo: “Nature is not a place to visit.
    [Show full text]
  • Probabilistic Assessment of Wadeable Rivers and Streams
    MASSACHUSETTS PROBABILISTIC MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM ASSESSMENT OF WADEABLE RIVERS AND STREAMS 2011-2015 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS KATHLEEN A. THEOHARIDES, SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MARTIN SUUBERG, COMMISSIONER BUREAU OF WATER RESOURCES KATHLEEN BASKIN, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER September 25, 2020 Cover Photo: Ashley Hill Brook in Mt. Washington, MA (MassDEP) Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................5 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................6 Survey Design ................................................................................................................................................6 Site Evaluation ...............................................................................................................................................7 Monitoring Design .......................................................................................................................................10 Sampling Plan ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 Field and Analytical Methods .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]