DOCSLIB.ORG

Probabilistic Assessment of Wadeable Rivers and Streams

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Probabilistic Assessment of Wadeable Rivers and Streams MASSACHUSETTS PROBABILISTIC MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM ASSESSMENT OF WADEABLE RIVERS AND STREAMS 2011-2015 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS KATHLEEN A. THEOHARIDES, SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MARTIN SUUBERG, COMMISSIONER BUREAU OF WATER RESOURCES KATHLEEN BASKIN, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER September 25, 2020 Cover Photo: Ashley Hill Brook in Mt. Washington, MA (MassDEP) Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................5 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................6 Survey Design ................................................................................................................................................6 Site Evaluation ...............................................................................................................................................7 Monitoring Design .......................................................................................................................................10 Sampling Plan ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 Field and Analytical Methods .............................................................................................................................. 12 Quality Assurance and Quality Control ............................................................................................................... 12 Survey Conditions ........................................................................................................................................12 Human Disturbance .....................................................................................................................................16 Assessment Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 17 Aquatic Life Use ................................................................................................................................................... 17 Recreational Uses ................................................................................................................................................ 18 Aquatic Life Use ...........................................................................................................................................19 Overall ................................................................................................................................................................. 19 Macroinvertebrate Community........................................................................................................................... 20 Fish Community ................................................................................................................................................... 21 Stressors .............................................................................................................................................................. 23 Recreational Use ..........................................................................................................................................29 Overall ................................................................................................................................................................. 29 Stressors .............................................................................................................................................................. 29 Summary and Next Steps ............................................................................................................................. 30 Cited Sources ...............................................................................................................................................32 Appendix A. MAP2 Wadeable Rivers and Streams Survey Design .................................................................. 36 Appendix B. MAP2 Evaluated Sites 2011 - 2015 ............................................................................................. 40 Appendix C. MAP2 Target Sampled Sites 2011-2015 ...................................................................................... 50 Appendix D. Summary of CALM Assessment Methodologies, Data Evaluation Procedures, and Criteria .......... 62 Appendix E. Assessment Methodology for Biological and Habitat Indicators .................................................. 71 List of Tables Table 1. Extent of the sample frame in each site evaluation category. ....................................................................9 Table 2. GHCN weather stations in each MAP2 stratum used in survey condition analysis. ................................. 13 Table 3. Average monthly observed and normal precipitation totals (inches) for five select weather stations in each stratum. Area shaded in gray indicates the May - September sampling period. .......................................... 15 Table 4. Percent of site visits associated with water quality and biological sampling where precipitation totals for the 2 days and 1 day prior to the survey day exceeded 0.5 inches. ....................................................................... 16 Table 5. Extent of the target population in each Human Disturbance Class. ......................................................... 17 Table 6. Aquatic Life Use condition (support, impaired) in the target population and temperature regime subpopulations. ....................................................................................................................................................... 19 Table 7. Macroinvertebrate community condition (excellent, satisfactory, impaired) in the target population and temperature regime subpopulations. ..................................................................................................................... 21 Table 8. Fish community condition (excellent, satisfactory, impaired) in the target population and temperature regime subpopulations. ........................................................................................................................................... 22 Table 9. Extent of the target population and temperature regime subpopulations violating or meeting CALM assessment criteria for temperature. ...................................................................................................................... 24 Table 10. Extent of the target population and temperature regime subpopulations violating or meeting CALM assessment criteria for dissolved oxygen. ............................................................................................................... 25 Table 11. Habitat quality (excellent, satisfactory, impaired) in the target population and temperature regime subpopulations. ....................................................................................................................................................... 27 Table 12. Extent of the target population violating or meeting CALM assessment criteria for other Aquatic Life Use stressors. ........................................................................................................................................................... 28 Table 13. Recreation Use condition (support, impaired) in the target population. ................................................ 29 Table 14. Extent of the target population violating or meeting CALM assessment criteria for Recreation Use stressors................................................................................................................................................................... 30 List of Figures Figure 1. MAP2 target sampled sites 2011 – 2015. ...................................................................................................8 Figure 2. Extent of the sample frame in each site evaluation category. ...................................................................9 Figure 3. NOAA precipitation stations. .................................................................................................................... 14 Figure 4. Extent of the target population in each Human Disturbance Class. ........................................................ 16 Figure 5. Aquatic Life Use condition (support, impaired) in the target population and temperature regime subpopulations. ....................................................................................................................................................... 19 Figure 6. Macroinvertebrate community condition (excellent, satisfactory, impaired) in the target population and temperature regime subpopulations. .............................................................................................................. 20 Figure 7. Fish community condition (excellent, satisfactory, impaired) in the target population and temperature regime subpopulations. ........................................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 8. Extent of the target population and temperature regime subpopulations violating or meeting CALM assessment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • COMMONWEALTH of MASSACHUSETTS TOWN NEW MARLBOROUGH OFFICE of the BOARD of SELECTMEN 807 Mill River Southfield Road, Mill River, MA 01244
    COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS TOWN NEW MARLBOROUGH OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF SELECTMEN 807 Mill River Southfield Road, Mill River, MA 01244 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BOARD OF SELECTMEN Wednesday, June 19, 2019 6:30 p.m. Town Hall 1. Call to Order 2. A Design Public Hearing will be held by MassDOT to discuss the project that proposes to rehabilitate three bridges in the Town of New Marlborough, MA; Norfolk Road over the Umpachene River, Lumbert Cross Road over the Umpachene River and Canaan Southfield Road over the Umpachene River. 3. Public Comment 4. Adjourn NOTE: The listings of agenda items are those reasonably anticipated to be discussed by the Chair at the time of posting. Not all items listed may be discussed; other items not listed may be brought up, by the Chair, for discussion to the extent it is permitted by law. The Board may change the order of the agenda items depending on extenuating circumstances. Minutes will be transcribed and made public upon approval of the Board and filed with the Town Clerk for public review. TOWN CLERK USE ONLY Sharon Fleck Department Signature Received: , 2019@ Date & Time Posted: , 2019@ Date & Time Town Clerk Signature To request an item placed on the agenda, please contact Town Hall by noon on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. Please leave the room if you need to converse with other members of the audience. If you wish to speak during the meeting, please raise your hand in order to be recognized by the Chairman. Please state your name for the record before you begin to speak on an issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Ffy 2019 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects Per 23 Cfr 450.334
    FFY 2019 ANNUAL LISTING OF OBLIGATED PROJECTS PER 23 CFR 450.334 Agency ProjInfo_ID MassDOT _Project Description▼ Obligation FFY 2019 FFY 2019 Remaining Date Programmed Obligated Federal Advance Federal Fund Fund Construction Fund REGION : BERKSHIRE MassDOT 603255 PITTSFIELD- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, P-10-049, LAKEWAY DRIVE OVER ONOTA 10-Jul-19 $2,919,968.00 $2,825,199.25 Highway LAKE MassDOT 606462 LENOX- RECONSTRUCTION & MINOR WIDENING ON WALKER STREET 15-Apr-19 $2,286,543.00 $2,037,608.80 Highway MassDOT 606890 ADAMS- NORTH ADAMS- ASHUWILLTICOOK RAIL TRAIL EXTENSION TO ROUTE 21-Aug-19 $800,000.00 $561,003.06 Highway 8A (HODGES CROSS ROAD) MassDOT 607760 PITTSFIELD- INTERSECTION & SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AT 9 LOCATIONS ALONG 11-Sep-19 $3,476,402.00 $3,473,966.52 Highway SR 8 & SR 9 MassDOT 608243 NEW MARLBOROUGH- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, N-08-010, UMPACHENE FALLS 25-Apr-19 $1,281,618.00 $1,428,691.48 Highway OVER KONKAPOT RIVER MassDOT 608263 SHEFFIELD- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, S-10-019, BERKSHIRE SCHOOL ROAD OVER 20-Feb-19 $2,783,446.00 $3,180,560.93 Highway SCHENOB BROOK MassDOT 608351 ADAMS- CHESHIRE- LANESBOROUGH- RESURFACING ON THE 25-Jun-19 $4,261,208.00 $4,222,366.48 Highway ASHUWILLTICOOK RAIL TRAIL, FROM THE PITTSFIELD T.L. TO THE ADAMS VISITOR CENTER MassDOT 608523 PITTSFIELD- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, P-10-042, NEW ROAD OVER WEST 17-Jun-19 $2,243,952.00 $2,196,767.54 Highway BRANCH OF THE HOUSATONIC RIVER BERKSHIRE REGION TOTAL : $20,053,137.00 $19,926,164.06 Wednesday, November 6, 2019 Page 1 of 20 FFY 2019 ANNUAL LISTING OF OBLIGATED PROJECTS PER
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3: Community Setting
    SECTION 3: COMMUNITY SETTING Regional Context The Town of Holland is nestled in the southeast corner of Hampden County, Massachusetts on the Connecticut border. It is bordered by the towns of Brimfield to the north, Wales to the west, Sturbridge to the east and Union, Connecticut to the south. Nipmuck State Forest in Connecticut forms the southern town border while Brimfield State Forest lies west of Town, and Tantaique Reservation lies east of town. Holland is within commuting distance of the Springfield; Worcester; Boston; Providence, Rhode Island; and Hartford, Connecticut areas. Access to major highways is convenient with Interstate Route 84 cutting across the very southeastern corner of town, and the Massachusetts Turnpike (Interstate 90) and Massachusetts Route 20 running north of Town. The Town of Holland encompasses about 13 square miles of rolling, wooded hills. Though there is some open land, forest dominates the uplands. In the hardwood dominated forests are scattered wetlands providing biological and scenic diversity. The town is bisected by the headwaters of the Quinebaug River and the associated water bodies of Hamilton Reservoir, and Lake Siog (Holland Pond). The river, ponds, reservoir, and numerous wetlands make up a wetland complex that not only dominates the town’s character but also is important in terms of its recreational value, scenic beauty, and wildlife habitat. Holland also has large areas of undeveloped forested lands, which are of regional conservation value. Besides sharing history, land uses, and landscapes, Holland and its neighbors share municipal services such as emergency response and schools. This cooperation, primarily between Holland, Wales, and Brimfield, allows each town to benefit from improved services difficult for a small town to provide on its own.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Carroll County, New Hampshire— New County, for Carroll Needs Hazard Mapping of Flood —Scoping
    Flynn, R.H. Prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 1 —Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Carroll County, New Hampshire— Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Carroll County, New Hampshire Open-File Report 2006–1236 Open-File Report 2006–1236 U.S. Department of the Interior Printed on recycled paper U.S. Geological Survey Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Carroll County, New Hampshire By Robert H. Flynn Prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 1 Open-File Report 2006–1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Acknowledgments The author thanks Debra Foster for her assistance in contacting towns in Carroll County to obtain preliminary scoping needs information and for editing this report, Laura Hayes for her assistance in entering effective stream information for Carroll County into the WISE (Watershed Information SystEm) Scoping module, and Ann Marie Squillacci and Tina Cotton for their help in publishing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft – Massdot Capital Investment Plan 1
    DRAFT – MASSDOT CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN 1 To our customers ­ I am pleased to present the Massachusetts Department of Transportation’s (MassDOT) draft five-year Capital Investment Plan (CIP). Over the coming weeks, we look forward to your feedback on the proposed projects that are funded. This document, in many respects, is the outcome of both Governor Patrick and the Legislature’s seven year effort to deliver on transportation reform and investment. In 2007, an immediate transportation needs bond bill was passed and signed into law, and the Governor created the first ever Mobility Compact to enable the historically siloed transportation agencies to work together to improve our system. One year later, the Patrick Administration worked with the Legislature to enact the $3.0 billion Accelerated 1 Secretary of Transportation Richard Davey offering remarks at the 2013 Bridge Program to address hundreds of crumbling bridges in Transportation Day on the Hill event at the State House. Massachusetts. In 2009, Governor Patrick and the Legislature delivered landmark transportation reform legislation that eliminated bureaucracies, improved safety and the customer experience, saved the taxpayer hundreds of millions of dollars and created MassDOT. In 2011 and 2012, the Patrick Administration launched a series of statewide conversations to hear the public’s vision for the future of transportation in the Commonwealth and ideas for how to equitably pay for it. This past July, new transportation reforms and additional resources became available to invest in transportation. And now, we are publishing the first consolidated transportation capital plan in the Commonwealth’s recent history. This CIP is designed to be a transparent, comprehensive plan that describes how MassDOT is funded and provides a roadmap for balancing in our statewide transportation needs with fiscally constrained transportation resources.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
    A River Network Publication Volume 18| Number 3 - 2008 Celebrating 40 Years: The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act by David Moryc, American Rivers & Katherine Luscher,River Network It is hereby declared to be the policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the Nation which, with their immediate environments, possess outstandingly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values, shall be preserved in free-flowing condition, and that they and their immediate environments shall be protected for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations. The Congress declares that the established national policy of dam and other construction at appropriate sections of the rivers of the United States needs to be complemented by a policy that would preserve other selected rivers or sections thereof in their free-flowing condition to protect the water quality of such rivers and to fulfill other vital national conservation purposes. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act – October 2, 1968 hat do a Snake, a Sturgeon, a Little Beaver Tuolumne River loved by John Muir, and the and a Buffalo have in common? They are Delaware, Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Rivers, all rivers protected by our federal Wild which cradled the American Revolution, are protected W and Scenic Rivers Act. On October 2, by this visionary law. And despite various myths and 1968, the Act—championed by Senator Frank Church misconceptions, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (ID)—was signed into law by President remains a powerful tool available for Lyndon Johnson. Forty years later, watershed conservationists to protect the Act protects more than 11,434 their local river.
    [Show full text]
  • New Marlborough 5 Village News
    nm5vn.org New Marlborough Village VOL XXII ©Manikowski News NO 6 October 2021 Clayton • Hartsville • Mill River • New Marlborough • Southfield SAVING A TOWN TREASURE The Historic Stone Arch Bridge over Campbell Falls Is Getting Needed Help By John Schreiber and Louise Yohalem hat do the Roman Colosseum, the U.S. Capitol WBuilding and New Marlborough’s Campbell Falls bridge have in common? These structures are built of stone blocks with a keystone in the center of the arch that is critical to its strength. They are all notable keystone arch constructions! Recently, The Berkshire Eagle had a front-page Outdoors Section article on historic keystone arch bridges in Massachusetts. Our own beautiful Campbell Falls bridge is not among those featured because the equally beautiful historic stone bridges in Chester, Middlefield, and Becket are now preserved, thanks to the efforts of several non- profit organizations. These four bridges were built from the early 1800s to photo by John Schreiber the beginning of the twentieth century as durable stone bridges to bear wagons over rivers and waterways, and later for railroads and automobiles. Block and tackle, wooden cranes, scaffolding, and pulleys with oxen and mules were used to raise the blocks into the correct, tight positions, often with little or no mortar required. New Marlborough’s antique INSIDE: keystone arch bridge is a remarkable structure that The Campbell’s Falls Road bridge, spanning the Whiting River, Art Show Opening ............... 3 spans the Whiting River as seen from the north side Board of Selectmen ............ 4 above Campbell Falls and, according to the Massachusetts Historical Commission, View from the Board ..........
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey
    imiF.NT OF Tim BULLETIN UN ITKI) STATKS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY No. 115 A (lECKJKAPHIC DKTIOXARY OF KHODK ISLAM; WASHINGTON GOVKRNMKNT PRINTING OFF1OK 181)4 LIBRARY CATALOGUE SLIPS. i United States. Department of the interior. (U. S. geological survey). Department of the interior | | Bulletin | of the | United States | geological survey | no. 115 | [Seal of the department] | Washington | government printing office | 1894 Second title: United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | | A | geographic dictionary | of | Rhode Island | by | Henry Gannett | [Vignette] | Washington | government printing office 11894 8°. 31 pp. Gannett (Henry). United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | | A | geographic dictionary | of | Khode Island | hy | Henry Gannett | [Vignette] Washington | government printing office | 1894 8°. 31 pp. [UNITED STATES. Department of the interior. (U. S. geological survey). Bulletin 115]. 8 United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | | * A | geographic dictionary | of | Ehode Island | by | Henry -| Gannett | [Vignette] | . g Washington | government printing office | 1894 JS 8°. 31pp. a* [UNITED STATES. Department of the interior. (Z7. S. geological survey). ~ . Bulletin 115]. ADVERTISEMENT. [Bulletin No. 115.] The publications of the United States Geological Survey are issued in accordance with the statute approved March 3, 1879, which declares that "The publications of the Geological Survey shall consist of the annual report of operations, geological and economic maps illustrating the resources and classification of the lands, and reports upon general and economic geology and paleontology. The annual report of operations of the Geological Survey shall accompany the annual report of the Secretary of the Interior. All special memoirs and reports of said Survey shall be issued in uniform quarto series if deemed necessary by tlie Director, but other­ wise in ordinary octavos.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolved by the Senate and House Of
    906 PUBLIC LAW 90-541-0CT. I, 1968 [82 STAT. Public Law 90-541 October 1, 1968 JOINT RESOLUTION [H.J. Res, 1461] Making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1969, and for other purposes. Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatimes of tlie United Continuing ap­ propriations, States of America in Congress assernbled, That clause (c) of section 1969. 102 of the joint resolution of June 29, 1968 (Public Law 90-366), is Ante, p. 475. hereby further amended by striking out "September 30, 1968" and inserting in lieu thereof "October 12, 1968". Approved October 1, 1968. Public Law 90-542 October 2, 1968 AN ACT ------[S. 119] To proYide for a Xational Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purPoses. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Wild and Scenic United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) this Act Rivers Act. may be cited as the "vVild and Scenic Rivers Act". (b) It is hereby declared to be the policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the Nation which, with their immediate environments, possess outstandin~ly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values, shall be preserved in free-flowing condition, and that they and their immediate environments shall be protected for the benefit and enjoy­ ment of l?resent and future generations. The Congress declares that the established national policy of dam and other construction at appro­ priate sections of the rivers of the United States needs to be com­ plemented by a policy that would preserve other selected rivers or sections thereof m their free-flowing condition to protect the water quality of such rivers and to fulfill other vital national conservation purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • PSNH, Merrimack Station, NH0001465
    MA0003654 Determinations Document July 22, 2002 6.0 CWA § 316(a) - Determination In Response to USGenNE’s Variance Application 6.1 Introduction This section of the NPDES permit development package for BPS presents EPA’s determination in response to USGenNE’s application for alternative thermal discharge limitations under CWA § 316(a) (commonly referred to as “a § 316(a) variance application”). As discussed in the Permitting History section of this document, the thermal discharge limits included in the original October 1973 NPDES permit for BPS were based on Massachusetts Water Quality Standards rather than a § 316(a) variance. This permit included a maximum temperature limitation of 90° F and a )-T limitation of 20° F. The permittee subsequently sought relaxation of those limitations under a § 316(a) variance. The record shows this request to have been extremely controversial. The permit’s maximum temperature and )-T limits were alternately raised and then returned to the original limits in a series of permit modifications and agreements over the years from 1976 to 1979.1 In 1979, a new permit was issued by EPA and MA DEP on the basis of a CWA § 316(a) variance. This permit raised the maximum temperature and )-T limits to 95° F and 22° F, respectively. These limits remain in place in the current permit with certain conditions. See EPA Fact Sheet for BPS Draft NPDES Permit No. MA003654 (June 11, 1993), p. 11. In 1982, although the maximum temperature and )-T limits of 95° F and 22° F remained constant, BPS was nevertheless effectively authorized to discharge more heat (in BTUs) to Mount Hope Bay when another permit change allowed the plant to discharge an increased volume of cooling water flow due to the conversion of Unit 4 from closed-cycle to open-cycle cooling.
    [Show full text]
  • New Marlborough Open Space 2004
    New Marlborough Open Space and Recreation Plan March, 2004 2 Table of Contents Section One: Plan Summary 5 Section Two: Statement of Purpose 7 Planning Process and Public Participation 7 Section Three: Community Se�ing 9 Section Four: Environmental Inventory and Analysis 15 A. Geology, Soils, and Topography 15 B. Landscape Character 18 C. Water Resources 18 D. Vegetation 21 E. Fisheries and Wildlife 26 F. Scenic Resources and Unique Environments 27 G. Environmental Challenges 29 Section Five: Inventory of Lands of Conservation 31 and Recreation Interest 31 A. Private Parcels With Permanent Protection 32 B. Private Parcels With Temporary Protection 35 C. Public and Nonprofit Protected Parcels 35 Section Six: Community Goals 39 A. Description of Process 39 B. Statement of Open Space and Recreation Goals 39 Section Seven: Analysis of Needs 41 A. Summary of Resource Protection Needs 41 B. Summary of Community’s Needs 43 C. Management Needs 44 Section Eight: Goals and Objectives 47 Section Nine: Five-Year Action Plan 49 Section Ten: Public Comments 59 Section Eleven: References 61 Appendix 64 3 4 Section One: Plan Summary Section One: Plan Summary Preserving rural character and protecting natural resources are the primary goals for the 2004 New Marlborough Open Space and Recreation Plan (OSRP). Situated in the most southern part of Berkshire County, New Marlborough is off the beaten path, roughly twenty miles from the nearest exit of the Massachuse�s Turnpike. The residents take pride in their sense of place and wish to maintain it. Recent decades of broad economic and demographic changes in New England are affecting the small, rural community of New Marlborough.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Summaries Section 604B Water Quality
    PROJECT SUMMARIES SECTION 604B WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING PROGRAM FFY 1998-2010 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection Glenn Haas, Acting Assistant Commissioner 2010 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SECTION 604B WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING PROGRAM PROJECT SUMMARIES FFY 1998-2010 Prepared by: Gary Gonyea, 604(b) Program Coordinator Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs Ian Bowles, Secretary Department of Environmental Protection Laurie Burt, Commissioner Bureau of Resource Protection Glenn Hass, Acting Assistant Commissioner Division of Municipal Services Steven J. McCurdy, Director 2010 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY Limited copies of this report are available at no cost by written request to: Division of Watershed Management Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 627 Main Street, 2nd floor Worcester, MA 01608 This report is also available from MassDEP’s home page on the World Wide Web at http://mass.gov/dep/water/grants.htm A complete list of reports published since 1963, entitled, “Publications of the Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management, 1963 - (current year),” is available by writing to the DWM in Worcester. The report can also be found at MassDEP’s web site, at: http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/envmonit.htm#reports TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE Introduction v Table 1 Number of 604(b) Projects and Allocation of Grant Funds by Basin (1998-2010) vi Projects by Federal Fiscal Year FFY 98 98-01 Urban Watershed Management in the Mystic River Basin ..........................................……. 1 98-02 Assessment and Management of Nonpoint Source Pollution in the Little River Subwatershed 2 98-03 Upper Blackstone River Watershed Wetlands Restoration Plan .................................….
    [Show full text]