The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act A River Network Publication Volume 18| Number 3 - 2008 Celebrating 40 Years: The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act by David Moryc, American Rivers & Katherine Luscher,River Network It is hereby declared to be the policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the Nation which, with their immediate environments, possess outstandingly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values, shall be preserved in free-flowing condition, and that they and their immediate environments shall be protected for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations. The Congress declares that the established national policy of dam and other construction at appropriate sections of the rivers of the United States needs to be complemented by a policy that would preserve other selected rivers or sections thereof in their free-flowing condition to protect the water quality of such rivers and to fulfill other vital national conservation purposes. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act – October 2, 1968 hat do a Snake, a Sturgeon, a Little Beaver Tuolumne River loved by John Muir, and the and a Buffalo have in common? They are Delaware, Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Rivers, all rivers protected by our federal Wild which cradled the American Revolution, are protected W and Scenic Rivers Act. On October 2, by this visionary law. And despite various myths and 1968, the Act—championed by Senator Frank Church misconceptions, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (ID)—was signed into law by President remains a powerful tool available for Lyndon Johnson. Forty years later, watershed conservationists to protect the Act protects more than 11,434 their local river. miles of 166 river stretches in 38 In recent years, through land states and the Commonwealth of management planning processes, many Puerto Rico. rivers have been identified as eligible or The passage of this federal suitable for designation. According to the legislation, after years of political federal government, at least 3,400 rivers wrangling, established one of our have been found to have outstanding nation’s strongest conservation tools qualities worthy of protection. At the for rivers. Enactment of the law request of local communities, the signified a fundamental shift in the governor or the managing agency, it is way we value rivers. For the first possible that many of these rivers could be time in our nation’s history we embraced added to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. conservation of rivers for their inherent unique qualities. So, exactly what does Wild and Scenic mean? As a result of the Act, many of our greatest rivers are Rivers listed under the Wild and Scenic Rivers act are guaranteed to be preserved forever. For example, the afforded a specific set of protections. In sum, a Missouri River explored by Lewis and Clark, the designation: cont. on page 4 CONTENTS 1 The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act NATIONAL OFFICE by David Moryc & Katherine Luscher 520 SW Sixth Avenue, Suite 1130 • Portland, OR 97204-1511 503/241-3506 • fax: 503/241-9256 3 From the President [email protected] • www.rivernetwork.org 9 State River Protection Programs by David Bolling River Network is a national, nonprofit 10 Common Misconceptions organization whose mission is to help by American Rivers people understand, protect and restore 12 A Checklist by Andy Kerr rivers and their watersheds. 18 The Eightmile River by Anthony Irving 21 Rivers Protected Under the Wild and Scenic Act RIVER NETWORK BOARD OF TRUSTEES Todd Ambs Dave Katz 22 Hosting a Film Festival Catherine Armington Ezra Milchman by Susie Sutphin Adrienne T. Atwell Paul Paryski Suzi Wilkins Berl Charles F. Sams III 24 Protected Rivers Help Strengthen and Diversify State Rob R. Buirgy Judith Spang and Local Economies Kimberly N. Charles Marc Taylor, Chair by American Rivers Mary Ann Dickinson Balijit Wadhwa Dianne Dillon-Ridgley James R. Wheaton 26 From No Water to Wild Waters Barbara J. Horn Robert L. Zimmerman, Jr. by Sam Frank 30 Niobrara Council by Kalli J. Kieborz 32 Voices from the Field RIVER NETWORK STAFF Matthew Burke Katherine Luscher 34 Resources & References Ryan Carter Ezra Milchman Waverly de Bruijn Deb Merchant 35 Partner Pitch Steve Dickens Julie Noble Dawn DiFuria Mary Ellen Olcese River Voices is a forum for information exchange among river and watershed Merritt Frey groups across the country. River Network welcomes your comments and sugges- J.R. Ralston tions. River Network grants permission and encourages sharing and reprinting of Bevan Griffiths-Sattenspiel Susan Schwartz information from River Voices, unless the material is marked as copyrighted. Please Jean A. Hamilla credit River Network when you reprint articles and send the editor a copy. Diana Toledo Additional copies and back issues are available from our national office. Kevin Kasowski Stephen Twelker Editor: Katherine Luscher Gayle Killam Wendy Wilson Editorial Assistance: Waverly de Bruijn, Kevin Kasowski Design & Layout: Greer Graphics 2River Network• RIVER VOICES • Volume 18, Number 3 From The President any years ago, my parents purchased land along New York’s Ausable River—a river protected under New York State’s Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers Act. It’s a quiet place M credit:Photo Collection Network River that always reminds me of what’s truly important in my life—people, nature and conservation. That is why, it is an honor to follow Don Elder, my predecessor as CEO of River Network, who so superbly positioned us to help people protect and restore rivers and their watersheds. I join River Network on the 40th anniversary of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. When it was passed on October 2, 1968, the United States was facing challenges much like today: people were alarmed by a deteriorating environment, the economy was headed towards major instability and a debilitating war was the focus of a contentious presidential election. So why, in the midst of such profound troubles, did our country set a national goal to identify and conserve remarkable rivers? I believe it was the awareness that healthy rivers could cleanse our polluted environment, fuel economic engines like agriculture and tourism and remind a country at war of what’s most important to protect. Our river heritage is vastly richer today because of the Act, but most of its potential remains unfulfilled. Many deserving rivers have not been designated, and many designated rivers have not been adequately protected. Like most environmental laws, the Act depends on citizen involvement and support. Successful implementation requires us to grow watershed protection organizations nationwide, increase partnerships with other water-dependent sectors and broaden and diversify public awareness of our work. By pursuing these goals, we can realize the full potential of the Act while addressing broader environmental and economic problems that are even more urgent today than they were in 1968. With this issue of River Voices, we aim to point the way forward. In partnership, President & CEO River Network Volume 18, Number 3 • River Network • RIVER VOICES 3 Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, cont. cont. from page 1 ★ Protects a river’s “outstandingly System and, if included, must be classified, remarkable” values and free-flowing designated and administered as a wild, character. scenic or a recreational river area. ★ ★ Protects existing uses of the river. Wild: Wild river areas are rivers or ★ sections of rivers that are free of Prohibits federally-licensed dams and impoundments and generally any other federally-assisted water inaccessible except by trail (i.e., no resource project if the project would roads), with pristine, unpolluted negatively impact the river’s watersheds or shorelines. These outstanding values. represent vestiges of primitive ★ Establishes, at a minimum, a quarter- America. mile protected riparian buffer corridor ★ Scenic: Scenic river areas are rivers or on both sides of the river. On the Rogue sections of rivers that are free of River in Oregon, for example, this impoundments, with shorelines or buffer provides protection for over watersheds still largely primitive and 13,000 acres of highly productive shorelines largely undeveloped, but riparian zone and forest. with limited road access (e.g., a bridge ★ Requires the creation of a cooperative crossing). river management plan that addresses ★ Recreational: Recreational river areas resource protection, development of are rivers or sections of rivers readily lands and facilities, user capacities, etc. accessible by road or railroad (which may run parallel to them), may have some shoreline development and may Taking a Closer Look have undergone some impoundment Now that you have a general overview, let’s or diversion in the past. spend a little time exploring the specifics of how the Act works. Rivers are not limited to protection under only one category; often different stretches Protects a river’s “outstandingly on the same river are protected by different remarkable” values and free-flowing categories. For instance, the Verde River in character Arizona has a 22.2 mile stretch protected as The intent of the Act is to preserve the free- “wild” and an additional 18.3 mile stretch flowing character and “outstandingly protected as “scenic.” Likewise, the Carp remarkable values” of designated rivers for River in Michigan has stretches designated future generations to enjoy. To be included as “wild,”“scenic” and “recreational.” Rivers in the System, a river, or stretch thereof, in the National System are often referred to must be a free-flowing stream and the as “wild and scenic rivers” without regard to adjacent land must possess scenic, their specific classification. recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, Given that most of our country’s rivers have historic, cultural or other similar values. been altered by humankind, it is worth Don’t be fooled by the title of the act; rivers mentioning that Congress did not intend all need not be “wild” in a pristine sense to rivers protected under the Act to be warrant protection.
Recommended publications
  • Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Carroll County, New Hampshire— New County, for Carroll Needs Hazard Mapping of Flood —Scoping
    Flynn, R.H. Prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 1 —Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Carroll County, New Hampshire— Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Carroll County, New Hampshire Open-File Report 2006–1236 Open-File Report 2006–1236 U.S. Department of the Interior Printed on recycled paper U.S. Geological Survey Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Carroll County, New Hampshire By Robert H. Flynn Prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 1 Open-File Report 2006–1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Acknowledgments The author thanks Debra Foster for her assistance in contacting towns in Carroll County to obtain preliminary scoping needs information and for editing this report, Laura Hayes for her assistance in entering effective stream information for Carroll County into the WISE (Watershed Information SystEm) Scoping module, and Ann Marie Squillacci and Tina Cotton for their help in publishing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolved by the Senate and House Of
    906 PUBLIC LAW 90-541-0CT. I, 1968 [82 STAT. Public Law 90-541 October 1, 1968 JOINT RESOLUTION [H.J. Res, 1461] Making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1969, and for other purposes. Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatimes of tlie United Continuing ap­ propriations, States of America in Congress assernbled, That clause (c) of section 1969. 102 of the joint resolution of June 29, 1968 (Public Law 90-366), is Ante, p. 475. hereby further amended by striking out "September 30, 1968" and inserting in lieu thereof "October 12, 1968". Approved October 1, 1968. Public Law 90-542 October 2, 1968 AN ACT ------[S. 119] To proYide for a Xational Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purPoses. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Wild and Scenic United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) this Act Rivers Act. may be cited as the "vVild and Scenic Rivers Act". (b) It is hereby declared to be the policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the Nation which, with their immediate environments, possess outstandin~ly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values, shall be preserved in free-flowing condition, and that they and their immediate environments shall be protected for the benefit and enjoy­ ment of l?resent and future generations. The Congress declares that the established national policy of dam and other construction at appro­ priate sections of the rivers of the United States needs to be com­ plemented by a policy that would preserve other selected rivers or sections thereof m their free-flowing condition to protect the water quality of such rivers and to fulfill other vital national conservation purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2020 Traffic Count Locations
    MUNICIPALITY LOCATION TYPE ALBANY NH 112 (KANCAMAGUS HWY) WEST OF BEAR NOTCH RD SINGLE TUBE COUNT ALBANY BEAR NOTCH RD NORTH OF KANCAMAGUS HWY DOUBLE TUBE COUNT ALBANY DRAKE HILL RD OVER CHOCORUA RIVER SINGLE TUBE COUNT ALBANY DUGWAY RD EAST OF NH 112 SINGLE TUBE COUNT ALBANY NH 112 (KANCAMAGUS HWY) OVER TWIN BROOK SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT US 302/NH 16 SOUTH OF HURRICANE MT RD AT CONWAY TL SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT US 302 (CRAWFORD NOTCH RD) EB AT STONY BROOK DOUBLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT US 302 (CRAWFORD NOTCH RD) WB AT STONY BROOK DOUBLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT ALBANY AVE AT STATE OF NH RR TRACKS SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT RIVER ST AT SACO RIVER SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT TOWN HALL RD EAST OF US 302/NH 16 SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT NH 16A OVER EAST BRANCH RIVER SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT BEAR NOTCH RD OVER DOUGLAS BROOK SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT FOSTER ST BRIDGE OVER BROOK SINGLE TUBE COUNT BARTLETT HURRICANE MOUNTAIN RD OVER HOYT BROOK SINGLE TUBE COUNT BATH US 302/NH 10 (RUM HILL RD) WEST OF NH 112 SINGLE TUBE COUNT BATH WEST BATH ROAD WEST OF STATE OF NH RR SINGLE TUBE COUNT BATH DODGE RD EAST OF PETTYBORO RD SINGLE TUBE COUNT BATH PORTER RD OVER AMMONOOSUC RIVER SINGLE TUBE COUNT BENTON TUNNEL STREAM RD OVER DAVIS BROOK SINGLE TUBE COUNT BERLIN SCHOOL ST NORTH OF MASON ST SINGLE TUBE COUNT BERLIN MOUNT FOREST ST EAST OF FIRST AVE SINGLE TUBE COUNT BERLIN EXCHANGE ST WEST OF PLEASANT ST SINGLE TUBE COUNT BERLIN YORK ST WEST OF PLEASANT ST SINGLE TUBE COUNT BERLIN MADISON AVE NORTH OF EMERY ST SINGLE TUBE COUNT BERLIN GRANITE ST BETWEEN
    [Show full text]
  • Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
    Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (P.L. 90-542, as amended) (16 U.S.C. 1271-1287) 1An Act To provide for a National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes. ********************************************************************* National Wild and Scenic River is a designation for certain protected areas in the United States. The National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act was an outgrowth of the recommendations of a Presidential commission, the Outdoor Recreation Resources Review Commission (ORRRC). Among other things, the commission recommended that the nation protect wild rivers and scenic rivers from development that would substantially change their wild or scenic nature. The act was sponsored by Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) and signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on October 2, 1968. A river or river section may be designated by the U.S. Congress or the Secretary of the Interior. As of 2004, a total of 156 rivers have wild and scenic status. Selected rivers in the United States are preserved for possessing outstandingly, remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values. Rivers, or sections of rivers, so designated are preserved in their free-flowing condition and are not dammed or otherwise improved. Designation as a wild and scenic river is not the same as designation as a national park, and does not generally does not confer the same level of protection as a Wilderness Area designation. Instead of enacting strict and mandatory conservation measures, the goal is often to preserve the character of a river. National Wild and Scenic rivers are each managed by one or more agencies of the federal or state government.
    [Show full text]
  • Carroll County, New Hampshire
    VOLUME 1 OF 2 CARROLL COUNTY, NEW HAMPSHIRE (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Carroll County Community Community Community Community Name Number Name Number ALBANY, TOWN OF 330174 JACKSON, TOWN OF 330014 BARTLETT, TOWN OF 330010 MADISON, TOWN OF 330220 BROOKFIELD, TOWN OF 330179 MOULTONBOROUGH, TOWN OF 330015 CHATHAM, TOWN OF 330181 OSSIPEE, TOWN OF 330016 CONWAY, TOWN OF 330011 SANDWICH, TOWN OF 330017 EATON, TOWN OF 330204 TAMWORTH, TOWN OF 330018 EFFINGHAM, TOWN OF 330012 TUFTONBORO, TOWN OF 330234 FREEDOM, TOWN OF 330013 WAKEFIELD, TOWN OF 330019 *HALE’S LOCATION, TOWN OF 330246 WOLFEBORO, TOWN OF 330239 HART’S LOCATION, TOWN OF 330213 *No Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified Effective: March 19, 2013 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 33003CV001A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for this community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections).
    [Show full text]
  • Missisquoi & Trout Rivers Management Plan, Vermont
    March 2013 Front Cover Photo Credits Main Photo: Missisquoi River – Dan Moriarty, courtesy of the Missisquoi River Basin Association (MRBA) First Row: John Little Paddling the Missisquoi – Ken Secor; Covered Bridge – John Selmer; Fishing the Trout – Brenda Elwood; Moose near the Hopkins Covered Bridge – Frank Wirth Second Row: Nice Buffer/Floodplain – Shana Stewart Deeds; Paddling the Missisquoi – Shana Stewart Deeds; Bakers Falls on the Missisquoi – Jonathan and Jayne Chase; Fog on the Missisquoi – Mary Alice Brenner; Behind the Monastery on the Missisquoi – Ave Leslie Inside Front Cover: Missisquoi River, Orleans County – Art Bell; flyover provided by Lakeview Aviation Back Cover Photo Credits Inside Back Cover: Missisquoi River, Franklin County – Art Bell; flyover provided by Lakeview Aviation. Back Cover: John Little’s Boat on the Trout River – Art Bell Upper Missisquoi and Trout Rivers Management Plan The Upper Missisquoi and Trout Rivers Wild and Scenic Management Plan is now available on our website (www.vtwsr.org and hard copies in the Town Clerks’ offices). This is a non- regulatory Plan summarizing the information collected over the three year study by the locally appointed Study Committee, illustrating examples of management success stories in our region, and encouraging the voluntary recommendations which the Study Committee feels will maintain the Missisquoi and Trout Rivers in healthy condition. Should designation occur, it will be based on this locally-developed Management Plan and would not involve federal acquisition or management of lands. The Upper Missisquoi and Trout Rivers Wild and Scenic Study Committee is pleased to present its Management Plan for the upper Missisquoi and Trout Rivers for community review.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 18/Monday, January 28, 2013/Rules and Regulations
    5738 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2013 / Rules and Regulations Date certain Federal assist- State and location Community Effective date authorization/cancellation of Current effective ance no longer No. sale of flood insurance in community map date available in SFHAs Braselton, Town of, Barrow, Gwinnett 130343 August 12, 1991, Emerg; September 29, ......do ............... Do. and Hall Counties. 2006, Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Buford, City of, Gwinnett and Hall 130323 N/A, Emerg; May 22, 1995, Reg; March 4, ......do ............... Do. Counties. 2013, Susp. Cumming, City of, Forsyth County ........ 130236 July 23, 1975, Emerg; August 1, 1986, Reg; ......do ............... Do. March 4, 2013, Susp. Douglas County, Unincorporated Areas 130306 January 31, 1975, Emerg; January 2, 1980, ......do ............... Do. Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Douglasville, City of, Douglas County ... 130305 August 22, 1979, Emerg; June 25, 1982, ......do ............... Do. Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Duluth, City of, Gwinnett County ........... 130098 December 17, 1975, Emerg; June 1, 1981, ......do ............... Do. Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Forsyth County, Unincorporated Areas 130312 April 12, 1977, Emerg; July 4, 1989, Reg; ......do ............... Do. March 4, 2013, Susp. Gwinnett County, Unincorporated Areas 130322 April 9, 1975, Emerg; June 15, 1981, Reg; ......do ............... Do. March 4, 2013, Susp. Norcross, City of, Gwinnett County ....... 130101 October 24, 1974, Emerg; May 1, 1980, ......do ............... Do. Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Sugar Hill, City of, Gwinnett County ..... 130474 September 30, 1998, Emerg; September ......do ............... Do. 29, 2006, Reg; March 4, 2013, Susp. Suwanee, City of, Gwinnett County ...... 130328 September 22, 1980, Emerg; June 1, 1981, ......do ..............
    [Show full text]
  • Carroll County, New Hampshire
    VOLUME 1 OF 2 CARROLL COUNTY, NEW HAMPSHIRE (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Carroll County Community Community Community Community Name Number Name Number ALBANY, TOWN OF 330174 JACKSON, TOWN OF 330014 BARTLETT, TOWN OF 330010 MADISON, TOWN OF 330220 BROOKFIELD, TOWN OF 330179 MOULTONBOROUGH, TOWN OF 330015 CHATHAM, TOWN OF 330181 OSSIPEE, TOWN OF 330016 CONWAY, TOWN OF 330011 SANDWICH, TOWN OF 330017 EATON, TOWN OF 330204 TAMWORTH, TOWN OF 330018 EFFINGHAM, TOWN OF 330012 TUFTONBORO, TOWN OF 330234 FREEDOM, TOWN OF 330013 WAKEFIELD, TOWN OF 330019 *HALE’S LOCATION, TOWN OF 330246 WOLFEBORO, TOWN OF 330239 HART’S LOCATION, TOWN OF 330213 *No Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified Preliminary: April 29, 2011 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 33003CV001A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for this community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections).
    [Show full text]
  • Wildcat Brook
    Wildcat Brook Wild and Scenic River Study Jackson, New Hampshire DRAFT REPORT February, 1988 North Atlantic Regional Office National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service This report was prepared pursuant to Public Law 90-542. the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, as amended. Publication of the findings and conclusions herein should not be construed as representing either the approval or disapproval of the Secretary of the Interior. The purpose of this report is to provide the information and alternatives for further considera­ tion by the National Park Service, the Secretary of the Interior, and other federal and state agencies. This report also serves as an Interim Report to Congress as called for in the Public Law. The Wildcat River in Jackson, New Hampshire is often popularly identified as "Wildcat Brook" in publications, maps and the media. Except where otherwise noted, this Draft Report also refers to the main stem of the river as Wildcat Brook. TABLE OF CONTENTS ~ I. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 1 II. BACKGROUNDANDSTATUSOFTHESTUDY 9 III. RESOURCE ASSESSMENT 15 N. RIVER CONSERVATION PLAN 27 v. ALTERNATIVES FOR RIVER PROTECTION 37 VI. APPENDICES 45 VII. BIBLIOGRAPHY 47 VIII. STUDY PARTICIPANTS 57 Summary of Findings BEANS PURCHASE • Wildcat River SACO RIVER BA'>L'I 0 5 MILES Orientation Map . =._. --,_, f'ti u•~ 0 -·--- """W,. ::;-;;,:;;_:. ' ---- ...~ -- .":. ' ORTHCONWAYN"W.NH-ME --1---._____ ..... _,.. __ _,..,._ ,._ I -~""..,..,' _____ -- .., -- i:--:i--~, ,__ --- ~ __ 23 ___ _ --- lJCl-·- •".0._u_....,. .... _.,..,.._, ,_ _.., I. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS In 1982 the National Park Service published the Nationwide Rivers Inventory, which systematically identified and evaluated rivers that would meet the minimum criteria for further study and/or potential inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.
    [Show full text]
  • Then and Now USVLT Turns 20
    Then and Now USVLT Turns 20 Peter Benson Interviewed by Meghan Moody Upper Saco Valley Land Trust (and recently rejoined Board member) the side of the road, and everyone knew achieved its 20th anniversary on Peter Benson. where it was. It was fantastic. There September 15th, 2020, a remarkable “When you are in the start of was no way that a larger organization milestone. Over the past two decades, something, you don’t know what the was going to take on a project of its size the organization has conserved more future holds,” Peter said. “We were very at the time. Everything really took off than 12,000 acres. No one, including intentional in developing the Land from there.” USVLT’s founders, could have predicted Trust, but I don’t think anyone could USVLT has continued to fill this how those conservation victories have have guessed where this was going local void within the conservation added up, nor the upheaval 2020 has to go.” Peter used the organization’s community ever since. Some projects delivered. Especially with this year’s first project, the Harding Easement that Peter helped start in the 90’s have increased demand for trails and open in Jackson, as an example of how the only been finalized since he returned to space, for recreational and spiritual group had a much more organic and the Board. Peter smiled and said, “The purposes alike, USVLT’s achievements home-grown approach to conservation. seeds that you plant sometimes can seem more important than ever. To “We just went there, it was 12 acres, saw take a while to germinate, but they do honor the occasion, we asked new that it was beautiful and had a ski trail come up.” He added that there has been Board member Meghan Moody to on it, and said, ‘Sure, why not?’” Peter a shift over the past two decades, as interview Land Trust founding member continued, “It was high-profile, right on some land owners have become much —continued on page 3 Photo: Mike Dana Mike Photo: “Nature is not a place to visit.
    [Show full text]
  • Probabilistic Assessment of Wadeable Rivers and Streams
    MASSACHUSETTS PROBABILISTIC MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM ASSESSMENT OF WADEABLE RIVERS AND STREAMS 2011-2015 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS KATHLEEN A. THEOHARIDES, SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MARTIN SUUBERG, COMMISSIONER BUREAU OF WATER RESOURCES KATHLEEN BASKIN, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER September 25, 2020 Cover Photo: Ashley Hill Brook in Mt. Washington, MA (MassDEP) Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................5 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................6 Survey Design ................................................................................................................................................6 Site Evaluation ...............................................................................................................................................7 Monitoring Design .......................................................................................................................................10 Sampling Plan ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 Field and Analytical Methods .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NHDOT State Bridge Aid Program - Effective Date 10/01/2020 Projects Listed by Fiscal Year of Advertisment
    NHDOT State Bridge Aid Program - Effective Date 10/01/2020 Projects Listed by Fiscal Year of Advertisment Website Posting STATE BRIDGE AID State Fiscal Current AD Project Red Estimated Cost Current Completion Year Name PROJ # Brg # Scope Description List? ($) All funds Status Designer Contractor Date Horace Greeley Rd Bridge 2018 Amherst 20231 060/158 Replace over Pulpit Brook Y $1,380,165Complete HTA E.D. Swett 2019 West St Bridge over Great 2018 Antrim 29468 173/075 Replace Brook Y $926,984Construction Quantum Cold River Bridges 2020 Cider Mill Rd Bridge over 2018 Bedford 21193 079/128 Replace McQuade Brook N $737,221Complete HTA Cold River Bridges 2019 Hillside Ave bridge over 2018 Berlin 15792 232/066 Replace Dead River Y $799,142Complete HEB Ray's Electric 2019 Birchdale Rd bridge over 2018 Bow 24225 092/136 Replace White Brook Y $742,584Closeout DK R.M. Piper 2019 Old Rt 110 bridge over 2018 Dummer 15815 042/043 Rehab Upper Ammonoosuc River Y $2,315,869Construction Quantum Winterset 2020 Spring Rd bridge over 2018 Gorham 41396 027/112 Replace Mount Crescent Brook N $286,116Complete HEB L.T. Corrigan 2019 Bypassed Lilac bridge 2018 Hooksett 29655 083/150 Rehab over Merrimack River N $875,000Complete E.D. Swett 2020 NH 12 bridge over Beaver 2018 Keene 26505 137/059 Replace Brook Y $2,535,556Closeout LBG BUR Construction 2020 US 4 / NH 10 (Mech St) bridge over Mascoma 2018 Lebanon 14552 120/115 Rehab River N $1,771,591Construction Stantec E.D. Swett 2020 Oak St bridge over Sugar 2018 Newport 16109 103/136 Replace River Y $2,230,587Closeout Kleinfelder Neil H.
    [Show full text]