Lignicoles Subproject Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lignicoles Subproject Report Crustose lichens associated with dead wood in northwestern North America: a review Review Draft, 25 March 2005 Toby Spribille1, Curtis Björk2 and Trevor Goward2 Abstract. Substrate affinities were reviewed for 506 species of epiphytic crustose lichens in northwestern North America based on literature and recent field research. A total of 241 species have been recorded as growing on wood, of which 50, or 10% of all epiphytic crustose lichens, have been found only on this substrate. The list of apparently obligate lignicoles includes both well-known species frequently encountered on wood as well as several that have been only recently reported or are as yet undescribed. More work is needed to determine the occurrence, richness and ecological amplitudes of lignicolous species in the various forest ecosystems of northwest North America. Introduction The role of dead wood in forested ecosystems has been the topic of increasing discussion and research in recent years. This interest in dead wood has been propelled by several factors: 1) the observation that levels of dead wood in many forested ecosystems have fallen precipitously from what they were historically (Linder & Ostlund 1998); 2) recognition of the importance of dead wood for various plants and animals; and 3) forestry-driven (and in part, regulation-mandated) research to identify minimum levels of dead wood for the maintenance of nutrient cycling function and viability of dead-wood-dependent species. In natural forests, dead wood occurs in a large variety of forms. Perhaps in its most unobvious manifestation, dead, decorticate lower branches of old living trees may provide the first habitat for lignicoles in a developing forest. Tree death and eventual loss of branches and bark creates a snag, with a more appreciable surface area for lignicole colonization. The fall of a snag may be sudden, creating a prostrate log on the forest floor, or the falling snag may become lodged in other trees, slowing its fall to the ground to a process of years. Logs in turn exhibit many characteristic stages of decay and weathering as the dead wood comes into contact with the ground and is buried under snow in winter. The relative amount and decomposition behaviour of dead wood is furthermore ecosystem- and climate-specific, with higher rates of rot in moist than in dry ecosystems (Brown et al. 1996). The life histories of many species are closely linked to the various types of dead wood. In British Columbia, for instance, approximately one-third of all forest-dwelling bird and mammal species use snags as sites for foraging, roosting or nesting (Bunnell & Kremsater 1990). Both coarse and fine woody debris have also been demonstrated to be important for entire communities of less conspicuous organisms, such as saproxylic insects (Bouget & Duelli 2004) and wood-inhabiting fungi (Kruys & Jonsson 1999, Norden et al. 2004) 1 Department of Vegetation Analysis, University of Göttingen, 37073 Göttingen, Germany; [email protected] 2 Edgewood Blue, Box 131, Clearwater, BC V0E 1N0, Canada 1 The importance of dead wood for lichens has long been appreciated, particularly in Europe (e.g., Chlebicki et al. 1996, Lõhmus & Lõhmus 2001, Humphrey et al. 2002). Even in Europe, however, no systematic surveys have been made of the contribution of lignicolous lichens to overall biodiversity and it is difficult to estimate what percentage of the overall flora they constitute. In northwest North America, there have been no published surveys focused specifically on lignicolous lichens, even at a local scale. Nevertheless, scores of floristic and taxonomic surveys from different parts of northwest North America over the past 25 years have provided a rich, until now untapped source of anecdotal evidence on substrate affinities for hundreds of lichen species. Here, we present the first systematic, literature-based survey of substrate affinities of a subset of the overall lichen flora of northwestern North America, namely the bark- and wood-dwelling crustose lichens. Materials and Methods We used a pre-existing database of 569 epiphytic crustose lichens of northwestern North America, defined here as including British Columbia, Washington, Oregon, California (north of 37 degrees), Idaho and Montana; individual lichen records from southeastern Alaska were also used in some instances. Our decision to use crustose lichens was based mainly on two practical considerations: 1) crustose lichens have been repeatedly identified as one of the main lichen groups displaying particular affinities for dead wood, both in northern Europe and in preliminary studies in British Columbia (Goward et al., in prep., Spribille, unpubl.); and 2) we were able to access a literature database developed for work on an upcoming crustose lichen flora of the same study area (Spribille & Goward, in prep.). Our first step was to filter out taxonomic problems, synonyms and questionable records from our database. This provided us with a list of ‘accepted’ names (Appendix 1). Next, we checked every known recent literature reference for each species in the database for information on substrate. Substrates were recorded as follows: wood, bark, moss/plant detritus, leaves, or resin. In addition to available literature, we also took into consideration recent unpublished studies (Goward et al., in prep., Spribille, unpubl.) as well as verified herbarium specimens in the collections of the authors. A discriminating approach was used to ensure data quality: most of the literature used was published after 1980, and special emphasis was given to recent systematic and floristic treatments. A list of references used for the review is in Appendix 2. Finally, substrate affinities were summarized in a master table and analyzed with an emphasis on wood-dwelling crustose lichen species. For analysis, crustose lichens were divided into two categories: non-calicioid crusts, encompassing four fifths of the lichen flora and customarily referred to simply as crustose lichens; and calicioid crusts (sensu Goward 1999), i.e. those bearing stalked apothecia, including numerous non-lichenized species of the order Mycocaliciales traditionally studied by lichenologists (Tibell & Wedin 2000). Results Of the 569 species included in the initial database, substrate data could be found for 506 species (Table 1; Appendix 2). The remaining 63 species fell into four categories: records available but substrate not indicated (2 species), records based on unverified, unpublished 2 specimens not seen by us (12 species), species previously assumed to occur in the flora but for which no supporting evidence could be found (14 species) and species for which literature was not available at the time of this writing (35 species). Of the 506 species for which data could be found, 241 have been recorded as occurring on wood and 434 on bark (Table 1). The ratios of species on bark vs. wood are quite different for non-calicioid and calicioid species groups: a similar number of calicioids occurs on wood (63 species) and bark (73 species), whereas among non-calicioid crusts, 363 species are found on bark, more than twice as many as the number found on wood (178 species; see Table 1). Of particular interest are the species that occur only on a single substrate type. When all crustose lichens are taken together, fifty species, or 10% of all species for which we had data, were recorded only on wood (obligate lignicoles; Tables 2 and 3). A large number of species are found only on bark, with 206 non-calicioid crustose (51%) and 34 calicioid species (32%) apparently bound to certain bark substrates and not known to go over onto wood, moss or other substrates. A smaller relative percentage of non-calicioid crusts are found only on wood (28 species, or 7%) compared to calicioids (22 species, or 21%). Discussion The available data suggest that a significant proportion of crustose lichens occur on dead wood and a large portion of these are strictly limited to this substrate. In addition, of the numerous species that occur both on wood and bark, many occur primarily on wood and only rarely on bark and vice versa. More detailed constancy or frequency data would be useful to highlight this pattern in more detail, but such detail will remain unavailable without more extensive and systematic exploration of the epiphytic crust lichen flora of the region. While it is true that the incompleteness of substrate data for some species may erroneously give the impression that some species are strict lignicoles or corticoles, most of the species included on the list have been collected multiple times and reported in more than one study. The increased level of collecting since the 1980s has permitted the sketching of ecological profiles for many species. Examples for such species include Lecanora orae- frigidae and Lecanora xylophila, two crust species found on driftwood, logs and fence rails in coastal areas (Brodo & Vänskä 1984). Calicioid lichens are another example of a group about which our knowledge has continuously grown in recent years. Many of the obligately lignicolous calicioids have been surveyed systematically in independent ecological studies in both Oregon by Rikkinen (2003a) and British Columbia (Goward et al., in prep.); ecological profiles for many species are thus becoming apparent. Furthermore, a review of literature from Europe, where many of the same lignicolous species also occur, reveals that, with few exceptions, species reported to be dead-wood obligates in the present review are also found primarily on this substrate across the Atlantic. It is in fact quite likely that the numbers of obligate lignicoles will rise. It is worthy of note that calicioids, which are proportionately much better represented on wood than non- calicioid crusts, have also been surveyed in far more detail in recent years than non-calicioid crusts. In fact, nearly all of the obligately lignicolous calicioids were discovered since 1990. Moreover, of the obligate lignicoles, three of the non-calicioid and five of the calicioid species are new to science, and thus the products of the most recent taxonomic research.
Recommended publications
  • 1307 Fungi Representing 1139 Infrageneric Taxa, 317 Genera and 66 Families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska A, , Frank Kauff B,1, Filip Högnabba C, Jeffrey C
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 132–168 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska a, , Frank Kauff b,1, Filip Högnabba c, Jeffrey C. Oliver d,2, Katalin Molnár a,3, Emily Fraker a,4, Ester Gaya a,5, Josef Hafellner e, Valérie Hofstetter a,6, Cécile Gueidan a,7, Mónica A.G. Otálora a,8, Brendan Hodkinson a,9, Martin Kukwa f, Robert Lücking g, Curtis Björk h, Harrie J.M. Sipman i, Ana Rosa Burgaz j, Arne Thell k, Alfredo Passo l, Leena Myllys c, Trevor Goward h, Samantha Fernández-Brime m, Geir Hestmark n, James Lendemer o, H. Thorsten Lumbsch g, Michaela Schmull p, Conrad L. Schoch q, Emmanuël Sérusiaux r, David R. Maddison s, A. Elizabeth Arnold t, François Lutzoni a,10, Soili Stenroos c,10 a Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0338, USA b FB Biologie, Molecular Phylogenetics, 13/276, TU Kaiserslautern, Postfach 3049, 67653 Kaiserslautern, Germany c Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland d Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, 358 ESC, 21 Sachem Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA e Institut für Botanik, Karl-Franzens-Universität, Holteigasse 6, A-8010 Graz, Austria f Department of Plant Taxonomy and Nature Conservation, University of Gdan´sk, ul. Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308 Gdan´sk, Poland g Science and Education, The Field Museum, 1400 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska
    The Lichenologist (2020), 52,61–181 doi:10.1017/S0024282920000079 Standard Paper Lichens and associated fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska Toby Spribille1,2,3 , Alan M. Fryday4 , Sergio Pérez-Ortega5 , Måns Svensson6, Tor Tønsberg7, Stefan Ekman6 , Håkon Holien8,9, Philipp Resl10 , Kevin Schneider11, Edith Stabentheiner2, Holger Thüs12,13 , Jan Vondrák14,15 and Lewis Sharman16 1Department of Biological Sciences, CW405, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada; 2Department of Plant Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria; 3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA; 4Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; 5Real Jardín Botánico (CSIC), Departamento de Micología, Calle Claudio Moyano 1, E-28014 Madrid, Spain; 6Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden; 7Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen Allégt. 41, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway; 8Faculty of Bioscience and Aquaculture, Nord University, Box 2501, NO-7729 Steinkjer, Norway; 9NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; 10Faculty of Biology, Department I, Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; 11Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; 12Botany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany; 13Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; 14Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic; 15Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic and 16Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multigene Phylogenetic Synthesis for the Class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 Fungi Representing 1139 Infrageneric Taxa, 317 Genera and 66 Families
    A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families Miadlikowska, J., Kauff, F., Högnabba, F., Oliver, J. C., Molnár, K., Fraker, E., ... & Stenroos, S. (2014). A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 79, 132-168. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2014.04.003 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.04.003 Elsevier Version of Record http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 132–168 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska a, , Frank Kauff b,1, Filip Högnabba c, Jeffrey C. Oliver d,2, Katalin Molnár a,3, Emily Fraker a,4, Ester Gaya a,5, Josef Hafellner e, Valérie Hofstetter a,6, Cécile Gueidan a,7, Mónica A.G. Otálora a,8, Brendan Hodkinson a,9, Martin Kukwa f, Robert Lücking g, Curtis Björk h, Harrie J.M. Sipman i, Ana Rosa Burgaz j, Arne Thell k, Alfredo Passo l, Leena Myllys c, Trevor Goward h, Samantha Fernández-Brime m, Geir Hestmark n, James Lendemer o, H. Thorsten Lumbsch g, Michaela Schmull p, Conrad L. Schoch q, Emmanuël Sérusiaux r, David R. Maddison s, A. Elizabeth Arnold t, François Lutzoni a,10,
    [Show full text]
  • British Lichen Society Bulletin No
    1 BRITISH LICHEN SOCIETY OFFICERS AND CONTACTS 2010 PRESIDENT S.D. Ward, 14 Green Road, Ballyvaghan, Co. Clare, Ireland, email [email protected]. VICE-PRESIDENT B.P. Hilton, Beauregard, 5 Alscott Gardens, Alverdiscott, Barnstaple, Devon EX31 3QJ; e-mail [email protected] SECRETARY C. Ellis, Royal Botanic Garden, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH3 5LR; email [email protected] TREASURER J.F. Skinner, 28 Parkanaur Avenue, Southend-on-Sea, Essex SS1 3HY, email [email protected] ASSISTANT TREASURER AND MEMBERSHIP SECRETARY H. Döring, Mycology Section, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, email [email protected] REGIONAL TREASURER (Americas) J.W. Hinds, 254 Forest Avenue, Orono, Maine 04473-3202, USA; email [email protected]. CHAIR OF THE DATA COMMITTEE D.J. Hill, Yew Tree Cottage, Yew Tree Lane, Compton Martin, Bristol BS40 6JS, email [email protected] MAPPING RECORDER AND ARCHIVIST M.R.D. Seaward, Department of Archaeological, Geographical & Environmental Sciences, University of Bradford, West Yorkshire BD7 1DP, email [email protected] DATA MANAGER J. Simkin, 41 North Road, Ponteland, Newcastle upon Tyne NE20 9UN, email [email protected] SENIOR EDITOR (LICHENOLOGIST) P.D. Crittenden, School of Life Science, The University, Nottingham NG7 2RD, email [email protected] BULLETIN EDITOR P.F. Cannon, CABI and Royal Botanic Gardens Kew; postal address Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, email [email protected] CHAIR OF CONSERVATION COMMITTEE & CONSERVATION OFFICER B.W. Edwards, DERC, Library Headquarters, Colliton Park, Dorchester, Dorset DT1 1XJ, email [email protected] CHAIR OF THE EDUCATION AND PROMOTION COMMITTEE: position currently vacant.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Differences in Carbohydrate Degradation and Transport Potential
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.01.454614; this version posted August 2, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 Large differences in carbohydrate degradation and 2 transport potential in the genomes of lichen fungal 3 symbionts 4 5 Philipp Resl1,2, Adina R. Bujold3, Gulnara Tagirdzhanova3, Peter Meidl2, Sandra Freire Rallo4, 6 Mieko Kono5, Samantha Fernández-Brime5, Hörður Guðmundsson7, Ólafur Sigmar 7 Andrésson7, Lucia Muggia8, Helmut Mayrhofer1, John P. McCutcheon9, Mats Wedin5, Silke 8 Werth2, Lisa M. Willis3, Toby Spribille3* 9 10 1University of Graz, Institute of Biology, Universitätsplatz 2, 8010 Graz, Austria 11 2Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Faculty of Biology Department 1, Diversity and 12 Evolution of Plants, Menzingerstraße 67, 80638 Munich, Germany 13 3University of Alberta, Biological Sciences CW405, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3 Canada 14 4Rey Juan Carlos University, Departamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química 15 Inorgánica, Móstoles, Spain. 16 5SWedish Museum of Natural History, Botany Department, PO Box 50007, SE10405 17 Stockholm, SWeden 18 7Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, Sturlugata 7, 102 19 Reykjavík, Iceland 20 8University of Trieste, Department of Life Sciences, via L. Giorgieri 10, 34127 Trieste, Italy 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.01.454614; this version posted August 2, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematique Et Ecologie Des Lichens De La Region D'oran
    MINISTERE DE L’ENSEIGNEMENT SUPERIEUR ET DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE FACULTE des SCIENCES de la NATURE et de la VIE Département de Biologie THESE Présentée par Mme BENDAIKHA Yasmina En vue de l’obtention Du Diplôme de Doctorat en Sciences Spécialité : Biologie Option : Ecologie Végétale SYSTEMATIQUE ET ECOLOGIE DES LICHENS DE LA REGION D’ORAN Soutenue le 27 / 06 / 2018, devant le jury composé de : Mr BELKHODJA Moulay Professeur Président Université d’Oran 1 Mr HADJADJ - AOUL Seghir Professeur Rapporteur Université d'Oran 1 Mme FORTAS Zohra Professeur Examinatrice Université d’Oran 1 Mr BELAHCENE Miloud Professeur Examinateur C. U. d’Ain Témouchent Mr SLIMANI Miloud Professeur Examinateur Université de Saida Mr AIT HAMMOU Mohamed MCA Invité Université de Tiaret A la Mémoire De nos Chers Ainés Qui Nous ont Ouvert la Voie de la Lichénologie Mr Ammar SEMADI, Professeur à la Faculté des Sciences Et Directeur du Laboratoire de Biologie Végétale et de l’Environnement À l’Université d’Annaba Mr Mohamed RAHALI, Docteur d’État en Sciences Agronomiques Et Directeur du Laboratoire de Biologie Végétale et de l’Environnement À l’École Normale Supérieure du Vieux Kouba – Alger REMERCIEMENTS Au terme de cette thèse, je tiens à remercier : Mr HADJADJ - AOUL Seghir Professeur à l’Université d’Oran 1 qui m’a encadré tout au long de ce travail en me faisant bénéficier de ses connaissances scientifiques et de ses conseils. Je tiens à lui exprimer ma reconnaissance sans bornes, Mr BELKHODJA Moulay Professeur à l’Université d’Oran 1 et lui exprimer ma gratitude
    [Show full text]
  • Testing Topological Hypotheses of Trapelioid Lichenized Fungi in a Large-Scale Phylogeny of Ostropomycetidae (Lecanoromycetes)
    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a paper published in Fungal diversity. Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Resl, P., Schneider, K., Westberg, M., Printzen, C., Palice, Z. et al. (2015) Diagnostics for a troubled backbone: testing topologicalhypotheses of trapelioid lichenized fungi in a large-scalephylogeny of Ostropomycetidae (Lecanoromycetes). Fungal diversity, 73: 239-275 http://dx.doi.org/DOI 10.1007/s13225-015-0332-y Access to the published version may require subscription. N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:nrm:diva-1277 Fungal Diversity DOI 10.1007/s13225-015-0332-y Diagnostics for a troubled backbone: testing topological hypotheses of trapelioid lichenized fungi in a large-scale phylogeny of Ostropomycetidae (Lecanoromycetes) Philipp Resl1 & Kevin Schneider1 & Martin Westberg2 & Christian Printzen3 & ZdeněkPalice4,5 & Göran Thor6 & Alan Fryday7 & Helmut Mayrhofer1 & Toby Spribille1,8 Received: 19 November 2014 /Accepted: 13 April 2015 # The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Trapelioid fungi constitute a widespread group of trapelioid clades within Ostropomycetidae. We found of mostly crust-forming lichen mycobionts that are key to strong support for a monophyletic group of nine core understanding the early evolutionary splits in the trapelioid genera but no statistical support to reject the Ostropomycetidae, the second-most species-rich subclass long-standing hypothesis that trapelioid genera are sister of lichenized Ascomycota. The uncertain phylogenetic to Baeomycetaceae or Hymeneliaceae. However, we can resolution of the approximately 170 species referred to reject a sister group relationship to Ostropales with high this group contributes to a poorly resolved backbone for confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Constancea 85: Tucker, Catalog of California Lichens, References
    Constancea 85, 2014 University and Jepson Herbaria California Lichen Catalog CATALOG OF LICHENS, LICHENICOLES, AND ALLIED FUNGI IN CALIFORNIA (second revision) Shirley C. Tucker REFERENCES ACHARIUS, E. 1810. Lichenographia Universalis. Dankwerts, Göttingen. ACHARIUS, E. 1814. Synopsis methodica lichenum, sistens omnes hujus ordinis naturatis detectas plantas, quas, secundum genera, species et varietates disposuit, characteribus et differentiis emendatis definivit, nec non synonymis et observationibus selectis illustravit auctor. Lund. 392 pp. ADLER, M. T., & T. AHTI. 1996. The distinction of Punctelia perreticulata and P. subrudecta (Parmeliaceae; Lecanorales). Lichenologist 28: 431–436. AHTI, T. 1966. Parmelia olivacea and the allied non-isidiate and non-sorediate corticolous lichens in the northern hemisphere. Acta Botanica Fennica 70: 1–68. AHTI, T. 1969. Notes on brown species of Parmelia in North America. The Bryologist 72: 233–239. AHTI, T. 1980a. Nomenclatural notes on Cladonia species. Lichenologist 12: 125–133. AHTI, T. 1980b. Taxonomic revision of Cladonia gracilis and its allies. Annales Botanici Fennici 17: 195–243. AHTI, T. 1984. The status of Cladina as a genus segregated from Cladonia, in H. Hertel & F. Oberwinkler (eds.), Beitrage zur Lichenologie. Festschrift J. Poelt. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia 79: 25–61. AHTI, T. 2000. Cladoniaceae. 1. Flora Neotropica 78. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx. AHTI, T. 2007. Further studies on the Cladonia verticillata group (Lecanorales) in East Asia and western North America, in A. Frisch, U. Lange & B. Staiger, Lichenologische Nebenstunden. Contributions to Lichen Taxonomy and Ecology in Honour of Klaus Kalb. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 96: 5–19. AHTI, T., & P. T. DEPRIEST. 2001. New combinations of Cladina epithets in Cladonia (Ascomycotina: Cladoniaceae).
    [Show full text]
  • Suija A, Kaasalainen U, Kirika PM, Rikkinen J. 2018. Taitaia, a Novel Lichenicolous Fungus in Tropical Montane Forests in Kenya (East-Africa)
    Published in: Suija A, Kaasalainen U, Kirika PM, Rikkinen J. 2018. Taitaia, a novel lichenicolous fungus in tropical montane forests in Kenya (East-Africa). The Lichenologist 50(2): 173–184. doi:10.1017/S0024282918000026 Taitaia, a novel lichenicolous fungus in tropical montane forests in Kenya (East- Africa) Ave Suija 1, Ulla Kaasalainen 2, 3, Paul Muigai Kirika 3, Jouko Rikkinen 3, 4. 1 Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai Street 40, EE- 51005, Estonia. E-mail: [email protected] 2 East African Herbarium, National Museums of Kenya, Museum Hill Road, P.O. Box 45166, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya 3 Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 7, FIN-00014 Finland. 4 Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, FIN-00014 Finland Abstract: During lichenological explorations of tropical montane forests in Kenya, a remarkable new lichenicolous fungus was repeatedly found growing on thalli of the epiphytic tripartite cyanolichen Crocodia cf. clathrata. Molecular phylogenetic analyses placed the fungus within Gomphillaceae (Ostropales, Lecanoromycetes), a family mainly of lichen-symbiotic species in the tropics. The anatomical features (unitunicate, non-amyloid asci and simple, septate paraphyses) as well as the hemiangiocarpic ascoma development confirm its taxonomic affinity. DNA sequence data showed the closest relationship was with Gyalidea fritzei, followed by Corticifraga peltigerae. A monotypic genus, Taitaia, is introduced to incorporate a single species, T. aurea. The new fungus is characterized by aggregated ascomata with yellow margins and salmon red discs developing from a single base. Key words: Ascomycota, Corticifraga, Gyalidea, lichen-inhabiting fungi, Taita Hills, taxonomy 1 Introduction The diversity of lichenicolous fungi in Africa is largely underexplored and the limited information available is scattered in the literature (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • New and Noteworthy Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi from Norway
    New and noteworthy lichens and lichenicolous fungi from Norway ANDREAS FRISCH, JON KLEPSLAND, ZDENĚK PALICE, MIKA BENDIKSBY, TOR TØNSBERG and HÅKON HOLIEN Frisch, A., Klepsland, J., Palice, Z., Bendiksby, M., Tønsberg, T. & Holien, H. 2020. New and noteworthy lichens and lichenicolous fungi from Norway. Graphis Scripta 32 (1): 1–47. Oslo. ISSN 2002-4495. Twelve species of lichens and lichenicolous fungi are reported as new to Fennoscandia. Additionally, we report 19 species as new to Norway. New localites are given for 47 rare or seldom collected species. The new combination Reichlingia anombrophila (Coppins & P. James) Frisch is proposed. Most collections were made in the boreo-nemoral and boreal rainforests during the NBIC funded project Three storied diversity – mapping and barcoding crustose lichens and lichenicolous fungi in the Norwegian rainforests and associated fieldwork in recent years. With the present contribution, we hope to raise awareness on previously neglected groups of lichenised and lichenicolous fungi and encourage further fieldwork in understudied habitats in Norway. Andreas Frisch, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway. Email: [email protected] (corresponding author). Jon Klepsland, BioFokus, Gaustadalléen 21, NO-0349 Oslo, Norway. Zdeněk Palice, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-25243 Průhonice, Czech Republic. Mika Bendiksby, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway. Tor Tønsberg, University Museum of Bergen, Department of Natural History, P.O.Box 7800, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway. Håkon Holien, Nord University, Faculty of Bioscience and Aquaculture, P.O.Box 2501, NO-7729 Steinkjer, Norway and NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • Popularisert Bidrag Ascomycetes New to Norway Found at Workshop in Hordaland, 13 -16 May 2019
    Popularisert bidrag Ascomycetes new to Norway found at workshop in Hordaland, 13 -16 May 2019 Björn Nordén, Roger Andersson, Mathias ABSTRACT Andreasen, André Aptroot, Putarak Chomnunti, During a workshop in Hordaland with invited Gernot Friebes, Walter Jaklitsch, Edvin international experts, we found 13 ascomycete Johannesen, John Bjarne Jordal, Hermann species new to Norway. These are presented Voglmayr. with photos and notes on their micromorpho- logy, ecology and occurrence in Skandinavia. SAMMENDRAG In addition, the rarely collected species Mela- På en workshop i Hordaland med inviterte spileella proximella and “Dothiorina tulasnei” internasjonale eksperter fant vi 13 ascomycet- (the asexual morph of Chlorociboria aeru- arter som var nye for Norge. Disse artene er ginascens) are reported. presentert med bilde og notater vedrørende mikromorfologi, økologi og utbredelse i INTRODUCTION Skandinavia. I tillegg rapporteres funn av Ascomycota is the most abundant and diverse den sjeldne artene Melaspileella proximella fungal phylum, but its members are still og av «Dothiorina tulasnei» (den asexuelle poorly known in most countries. There are morph av Chlorociboria aeruginascens). new country records of ascomycetes, and even new species to science, waiting to be Figure 1. The participants in the workshop in front of Ørredalsfossen in Kvam, Hordaland. From the left: André Aptroot, Putarak Chomnunti, Björn Nordén, Walter Jaklitsch, Hermann Voglmayr, Gernot Friebes, Edvin Johannesen, John Bjarne Jordal, Roger Andersson, Mathias Andreasen. Foto: BN. AGARICA vol. 39 53 discovered in almost any forest. The problem AA: Andre Aptroot, PC: Putarak Chomnunti, is ‘just’ to find them and to identify them, GF: Gernot Friebes, WJ: Walter Jaklitsch, something that requires long training and EJ: Edvin Johannesen, HV: Hermann Vogl- experience.
    [Show full text]
  • JOLANTA M. MIADLIKOWSKA Department of Biology Duke University Box 90338 Durham, NC 27708-0338 Voice: 919-660-7287 • Fax: 919-660-7293 • E-Mail: [email protected]
    JOLANTA M. MIADLIKOWSKA Department of Biology Duke University Box 90338 Durham, NC 27708-0338 VoiCe: 919-660-7287 • Fax: 919-660-7293 • E-mail: [email protected] EDUCATION 1994-1999 Ph.D. Biological Sciences (D.SC – DoCtor of SCienCe), UNIVERSITY OF GDANSK, GDANSK, POLAND. Title of Ph.D. dissertation: “Revision of the genus Peltigera (Peltigerineae, AsComyCota) in Poland based on a world-wide phylogenetiC synthesis of morphological, chemical and molecular data”. Supervisor: Prof. W. FaltynowiCz 1987-1989 M.Sc. Biological Sciences, UNIVERSITY OF GDANSK, GDANSK, POLAND. Title of M.SC. dissertation: “LiChens of the Lebska Bar Nature Reserve (N Poland)”. Supervisor: Prof. W. FaltynowiCz 1983-1987 B.Sc. Biological Sciences, UNIVERSITY OF GDANSK, GDANSK, POLAND. PROFESSIONAL ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2016-pres. INSTRUCTOR B, Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC (Biology 201L: Gateway to Biology: MoleCular Biology). 2016-pres. SENIOR RESEARCHER AND LAB MANAGER, Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC (laboratory of Dr. F. Lutzoni) 2004-2016 LABORATORY RESEARCH ANALYST II, Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC (laboratory of Dr. F. Lutzoni). 2001-2004 POSTDOCTORAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATE, Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC (laboratory of Dr. F. Lutzoni). 1999/2001 POSTDOCTORAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATE, Department of Botany, Field Museum of Natural History, ChiCago, IL (laboratory of Dr. F. Lutzoni). 1999-2004 ADJUNCT PROFESSOR, Department of Plant Taxonomy and Nature Conservation, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland. 1989-1999 GRADUATE TEACHING ASSISTANT, Department of Plant ECology and Nature ProteCtion, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland. InstruCtor in the following Courses: SystematiCs and Morphology of CryptogamiC Plants and Fungi, SystematiCs of VasCular Plants; Fundamentals of LiChenology, and LiChens as BioindiCators.
    [Show full text]