Sn1 Reactions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

SN1 REACTIONS Introduction Ingold and Hughes coined the term SN1 (subsitution nucleophile and unimolecular) which depends on only substrate concentration. Nucleophilic substitution reaction occurs when the substrate and nucleophile react together in a two-step process, where the first step involves leaving group (LG),it leaves first and leads to a carbocation intermediate, while the second step involves the nucleophile (Nu), Nu attacks the carbocation intermediate. SN1 Reaction Nucleophilic substitution reactions that follow first order kinetics are known as SN1 reactions. The rate of first order reaction depends only upon the concentration of the substrate. These reactions can be completed in following manner: Kinetics of SN1 Reactions The SN1 reaction is initiated by the dissociation of the leaving group and formation of the carbocation intermediate in the first step. After formation of the carbocation intermediate, the nucleophile takes part in the second step. Increasing or decreasing the concentration of the nucleophile has no measurable effect on the rate. The nucleophile is not involved in the initial step of rate-determination, thus the concentration does not affect the overall reaction rate. This reaction follows first order kinetics. The reaction is first order with respect to alkyl halide while zero order with respect to the nucleophile. Rate = k [Substrate] The energy profile diagram is shown in fig.1 Energy Profile of SN1 reaction The SN1 reactions are sometimes referred to solvolysis reactions. Stereochemical Features of SN1 Reaction: When a reaction is proceeding by SN1 mechanism , then inversion and retention of congiguration will occur , the amount of each depending on vatious factors. In case the substrate is optically active , the carbonium ion is flat (trigonal hybridisation ) and hence attack by the nucleophilic reagent can take place equally on either side. This means that equal amounts of (+) and (-) forms of the product will be produced. The result is racemisation. As mentioned earlier , this is broad generalisation and the composition of product(enantiomers) is depended on several experimental conditions. A possible explanation is that the departing group shields the side carbon atom at which it was attached so that the incoming nucleophile more easily approached from the other side For example, (R)-1-Chloro-1-phenylbutane undergoes solvolysis in water lead to optically inactive product enantiomeric alcohols. Factors Influencing SN1 Reaction Solvent: The rate of the reaction can be affected by the energy level of the reagents. Solvation of the carbocation allows the carbocation to be surrounded by more electron density, making the positive charge more stable (see below). The solvent can be protic or aprotic, but it must be polar solvent. Polar protic solvents have a H-atom attached to an electronegative atom so the hydrogen is highly polarized. Polar aprotic solvents have a dipole moment, but their hydrogen is not highly polarized. Polar aprotic solvents are not used in SN1 reactions because some of them can react with the carbocation intermediate and lead to unwanted product. Thus, polar protic solvents are preferred in SN1 reaction which helps to speed up the rate of reaction due to large dipole moment of the solvent which helps to stabilize the transition state. The highly positive and highly negative parts interact with the substrate to lower the energy of the transition state. Since the carbocation is unstable, anything that can stabilize this even a little will speed up the reaction. Sometimes in an SN1 reaction the solvent acts as the nucleophile known as solvolysis reaction. The polarity and the ability of the solvent to stabilize the intermediate carbocation, is very important as shown by the relative rate data for the solvolysis (in table). The dielectric constant of a solvent provides a measure of the solvent's polarity. A dielectric constant below 15 is usually considered non-polar. Thus, higher the dielectric constant more polar will be substance and in the case of SN1 reactions the faster the rate. Table Solvent Dielectric Constant Relative rate Acetic acid 6 1 Methanol 33 4 Water 78 150000 The example given here illustrates this concept. Nucleophile: Nucleophiles involved in the SN1 mechanism are mostly weak and neutral molecules (viz. H2O, ROH). The strength of the nucleophile does not affect the reaction rate of SN1 because; the nucleophile is involved in the rate- determining step. However, if you have more than one nucleophile competing to bond to the carbocation, the strengths and concentrations of those nucleophiles affect the distribution of products. For example, if you have (CH3)3CCl reacting in water and formic acid where the water and formic acid are competing nucleophiles, you will get two different products: (CH3)3COH and (CH3)3COCOH. The relative yields of these products depend on the concentrations and relative reactivities of the nucleophiles. Substrate: The hyperconjugation and the inductive effect allow alkyl groups to stabilize carbocations. The more stable carbocation intermediate has a lower activation barrier, so the SN1 reaction occurs faster. In general, the SN1 reaction is favored in the order is Benzylic > Allylic > 3° > 2° > 1° >> Me+. Substrates wherein the leaving group (LG) is on a 3° carbon will lead to a reaction in the presence of a good nucleophile (Nu). Since, 1° carbocations are highly energetically unfavorable, as a rule of thumb they generally do not form. The rate for hydrolysis of alkyl halide is in the order of halides, 3o > 2o > 1o > MeX. Thus, we can say the electronic factor is more important than the steric factor. The Eact for the carbocation intermediate will be highest for MeX (1o), while least for the 3o. The molecules in which carbon next to the site of substitution contains a double bond, the SN1 reaction is possible. The reason is that the positive charge on the carbocation can be delocalized among multiple possible resonance structures (resonance and delocalization) making the carbocation dramatically stable. This effect can occur when the carbon atom of interest is next to one double bond (allylic) or a benzene ring (benzylic). In allylic case the delocalization of the positive charge, the nucleophile can attack at multiple sites while this effect is absent in the benzylic system due to the need to preserve aromaticity. For example, the allylic carbocation can form two different resonance structure, both are available for reaction (see below). In the first example we end up with similar carbocation intermediate but we have different situation in the second example where we have 2o and 3o carbocation intermediates. Thus, second reaction will lead to 3o product through stable 3o carbocation intermediate. Delocalization and resonance If there is a benzylic carbocation, it is also resonance stabilized but only the carbocation on the benzylic position is reactive (retains the aromatic ring) as follows: Leaving Group: The leaving group is almost always expelled with a full negative charge. The best leaving groups are those that can best stabilize an anion (i.e. a weak base). SN1 reaction speeds up with a good leaving group. This is because the leaving group is involved in the rate-determining step. A good leaving group wants to leave so it breaks the C-leaving group bond faster. Examples of LG: - - - - - - - - (Good…….) OMs, OTos, Triflate ion, NH3 > H2O ≈ I , Br > Cl > F ( OH, NH2) (…….poor) As you go from left to right on the periodic table, electron donating ability decreases and thus ability to be a good leaving group increases. Halides are an example of a good leaving group whose leaving-group ability increases as you go down the column. Other examples of good leaving group viz. methyl sulfate ion and other sulfonate ions. - - - - (Good)….. I > Br > Cl > F …..(poor) For example: The two reactions below is the same reaction done with two different leaving groups. One is significantly faster than the other. This is because the better leaving group leaves faster and thus the reaction can proceed faster. 1. Examples of SN1 Reactions Bromination: SN1 Mechanism for Reaction of Alcohols with HBr: Step i: Acid/base Reaction: Protonation of the alcoholic oxygen to make it a better leaving group. This step is fast and reversible. The lone pairs on the oxygen make it a Lewis base. Step ii: Rate determining step: Cleavage of the C-O bond allows the loss of the leaving group, a neutral water molecule, to give a carbocation intermediate. Step iii: Attack of the nucleophilic bromide ion on the electrophilic carbocation creates the alkyl bromide. Rearrangement reactions in SN1 reactions: Carbocation intermediates, once formed rearrangements can potentially occur which include SN1 reactions, E1 elimination and electrophilic addition to double bonds. Some examples are as follows which involve either hydride shift or alkyl shift. .
Recommended publications
  • 3 + 3HC1 Effect of Water and Ammonia, Respectively, Upon

    3 + 3HC1 Effect of Water and Ammonia, Respectively, Upon

    VOL. 23, 1937 CHEMISTRY: SLOB UTSKY, A UDRIETHAND CAMPBELL 611 ACID CATALYSIS IN LIQUID AMMONIA. I. AMMONOL YSIS OF DIETHYLMALONA TE BY CHARLES SLOBUTSEY, L. F. AUDRIETH AND R. W. CAMPBELL DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, URBANA, ILLINOIS Communicated November 3, 1937 Numerous investigations have shown that liquid ammonia possesses unusual properties as a solvent' for many inorganic and organic compounds. Like water it is the parent substance of a system of acids, bases and salts.2 Liquid ammonia also reacts directly with many substances. Solvolysis takes place and in the case of ammonia such reactions are termed ammono- lytic reactions. Just as phosphorus trichloride is hydrolyzed by water (1), so it may be ammonolyzed3 by ammonia to give the nitrogen analogs of phosphorous and hydrochloric acids (2). PCI + 3HOH -- P(OH)3 + 3HC1 (1) PCI3 + 5HNH2 -+ P(NH)(NH2) + 3NH4C1 (2) Many hydrolytic reactions are catalyzed in aqueous solutions by acids or bases. Thus, the inversion of cane sugar is catalyzed by acids and the velocity of the reaction is a function of the concentration of the hydrogen ion. Esters also undergo hydrolysis and such reactions are markedly catalyzed by the hydrogen ion, or in terms of the modern Bronsted concept of acidity, by the onium4 ion, or solvated proton. It was, therefore, to have been expected that the rate of ammonolysis of esters in liquid ammonia would be accelerated by the presence of ammonium salts, which have been shown to possess acid character in liquid ammonia. It has already been demonstrated qualitatively that ammonium salts do exert a catalytic effect in other ammonolytic reactions.
  • Bsc Chemistry

    Bsc Chemistry

    Subject Chemistry Paper No and Title 05, ORGANIC CHEMISTRY-II (REACTION MECHANISM-I) Module No and Title 15, The Neighbouring Mechanism, Neighbouring Group Participation by π and σ Bonds Module Tag CHE_P5_M15 CHEMISTRY PAPER :5, ORGANIC CHEMISTRY-II (REACTION MECHANISM-I) MODULE: 15 , The Neighbouring Mechanism, Neighbouring Group Participation by π and σ Bonds TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Learning Outcomes 2. Introduction 3. NGP Participation 3.1 NGP by Heteroatom Lone Pairs 3.2 NGP by alkene 3.3 NGP by Cyclopropane, Cyclobutane or a Homoallyl group 3.4 NGP by an Aromatic Ring 4. Neighbouring Group Participation on SN2 Reactions 5. Neighbouring Group Participation on SN1 Reactions 6. Neighbouring Group and Rearrangement 7. Examples 8. Summary CHEMISTRY PAPER :5, ORGANIC CHEMISTRY-II (REACTION MECHANISM-I) MODULE: 15 , The Neighbouring Mechanism, Neighbouring Group Participation by π and σ Bonds 1. Learning Outcomes After studying this module, you shall be able to Know about NGP reaction Learn reaction mechanism of NGP reaction Identify stereochemistry of NGP reaction Evaluate the factors affecting the NGP reaction Analyse Phenonium ion, NGP by alkene, and NGP by heteroatom. 2. Introduction The reaction centre (carbenium centre) has direct interaction with a lone pair of electrons of an atom or with the electrons of s- or p-bond present within the parent molecule but these are not in conjugation with the reaction centre. A distinction is sometimes made between n, s and p- participation. An increase in rate due to Neighbouring Group Participation (NGP) is known as "anchimeric assistance". "Synartetic acceleration" happens to be the special case of anchimeric assistance and applies to participation by electrons binding a substituent to a carbon atom in a β- position relative to the leaving group attached to the α-carbon atom.
  • Reaction Kinetics in Organic Reactions

    Reaction Kinetics in Organic Reactions

    Autumn 2004 Reaction Kinetics in Organic Reactions Why are kinetic analyses important? • Consider two classic examples in asymmetric catalysis: geraniol epoxidation 5-10% Ti(O-i-C3H7)4 O DET OH * * OH + TBHP CH2Cl2 3A mol sieve OH COOH5C2 L-(+)-DET = OH COOH5C2 * OH geraniol hydrogenation OH 0.1% Ru(II)-BINAP + H2 CH3OH P(C6H5)2 (S)-BINAP = P(C6 H5)2 • In both cases, high enantioselectivities may be achieved. However, there are fundamental differences between these two reactions which kinetics can inform us about. 1 Autumn 2004 Kinetics of Asymmetric Catalytic Reactions geraniol epoxidation: • enantioselectivity is controlled primarily by the preferred mode of initial binding of the prochiral substrate and, therefore, the relative stability of intermediate species. The transition state resembles the intermediate species. Finn and Sharpless in Asymmetric Synthesis, Morrison, J.D., ed., Academic Press: New York, 1986, v. 5, p. 247. geraniol hydrogenation: • enantioselectivity may be dictated by the relative reactivity rather than the stability of the intermediate species. The transition state may not resemble the intermediate species. for example, hydrogenation of enamides using Rh+(dipamp) studied by Landis and Halpern (JACS, 1987, 109,1746) 2 Autumn 2004 Kinetics of Asymmetric Catalytic Reactions “Asymmetric catalysis is four-dimensional chemistry. Simple stereochemical scrutiny of the substrate or reagent is not enough. The high efficiency that these reactions provide can only be achieved through a combination of both an ideal three-dimensional structure (x,y,z) and suitable kinetics (t).” R. Noyori, Asymmetric Catalysis in Organic Synthesis,Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1994, p.3. “Studying the photograph of a racehorse cannot tell you how fast it can run.” J.
  • S.T.E.T.Women's College, Mannargudi Semester Iii Ii M

    S.T.E.T.Women's College, Mannargudi Semester Iii Ii M

    S.T.E.T.WOMEN’S COLLEGE, MANNARGUDI SEMESTER III II M.Sc., CHEMISTRY ORGANIC CHEMISTRY - II – P16CH31 UNIT I Aliphatic nucleophilic substitution – mechanisms – SN1, SN2, SNi – ion-pair in SN1 mechanisms – neighbouring group participation, non-classical carbocations – substitutions at allylic and vinylic carbons. Reactivity – effect of structure, nucleophile, leaving group and stereochemical factors – correlation of structure with reactivity – solvent effects – rearrangements involving carbocations – Wagner-Meerwein and dienone-phenol rearrangements. Aromatic nucleophilic substitutions – SN1, SNAr, Benzyne mechanism – reactivity orientation – Ullmann, Sandmeyer and Chichibabin reaction – rearrangements involving nucleophilic substitution – Stevens – Sommelet Hauser and von-Richter rearrangements. NUCLEOPHILIC SUBSTITUTION Mechanism of Aliphatic Nucleophilic Substitution. Aliphatic nucleophilic substitution clearly involves the donation of a lone pair from the nucleophile to the tetrahedral, electrophilic carbon bonded to a halogen. For that reason, it attracts to nucleophile In organic chemistry and inorganic chemistry, nucleophilic substitution is a fundamental class of reactions in which a leaving group(nucleophile) is replaced by an electron rich compound(nucleophile). The whole molecular entity of which the electrophile and the leaving group are part is usually called the substrate. The nucleophile essentially attempts to replace the leaving group as the primary substituent in the reaction itself, as a part of another molecule. The most general form of the reaction may be given as the following: Nuc: + R-LG → R-Nuc + LG: The electron pair (:) from the nucleophile(Nuc) attacks the substrate (R-LG) forming a new 1 bond, while the leaving group (LG) departs with an electron pair. The principal product in this case is R-Nuc. The nucleophile may be electrically neutral or negatively charged, whereas the substrate is typically neutral or positively charged.
  • SN2 , SN1 , E2 , & E1: Substitution and Elimination Reactions

    SN2 , SN1 , E2 , & E1: Substitution and Elimination Reactions

    SN2 , SN1 , E2 , & E1: Substitution and Elimination Reactions • Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions (SN2 and SN1) replace a leaving group with a nucleophile (Nu: or Nu: - ) • Elimination Reactions (E2 and E1) generate a double bond by loss of " A+ " and " B: - " • They may compete with each other Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions - SN2 Reaction: • Reaction is: o Stereospecific (Walden Inversion of configuration) o Concerted - all bonds form and break at same time o Bimolecular - rate depends on concentration of both nucleophile and substrate • Substrate: o Best if primary (one substituent on carbon bearing leaving group) o works if secondary, fails if tertiary • Nucleophile: o Best if more reactive (i.e. more anionic or more basic) • Leaving Group: Best if more stable (i.e. can support negative charge well): o TsO- (very good) > I- > Br- > Cl- > F- (poor) o RF , ROH , ROR , RNH2 are NEVER Substrates for SN2 reactions o Leaving Groups on double-bonded carbons are never replaced by SN2 reactions • Solvent: Polar Aprotic (i.e. no OH) is best. o For example dimethylsulfoxide ( CH3SOCH3 ), dimethylformamide ( HCON(CH3)2 ), acetonitrile ( CH3CN ). o Protic solvents (e.g. H2O or ROH) deactivate nucleophile by hydrogen bonding but can be used in some case Intro Chem Handouts Substitution & Elimination Reactions Page 1 of 3 Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions – SN1 Reaction: • Reaction is: o Non-stereospecific (attack by nucleophile occurs from both sides) o Non-concerted - has carbocation intermediate o Unimolecular - rate depends on concentration of only the substrate • Substrate: o Best if tertiary or conjugated (benzylic or allylic) carbocation can be formed as leaving group departs o never primary • Nucleophile: o Best if more reactive (i.e.
  • Elimination Reactions Are Described

    Elimination Reactions Are Described

    Introduction In this module, different types of elimination reactions are described. From a practical standpoint, elimination reactions widely used for the generation of double and triple bonds in compounds from a saturated precursor molecule. The presence of a good leaving group is a prerequisite in most elimination reactions. Traditional classification of elimination reactions, in terms of the molecularity of the reaction is employed. How the changes in the nature of the substrate as well as reaction conditions affect the mechanism of elimination are subsequently discussed. The stereochemical requirements for elimination in a given substrate and its consequence in the product stereochemistry is emphasized. ELIMINATION REACTIONS Objective and Outline beta-eliminations E1, E2 and E1cB mechanisms Stereochemical considerations of these reactions Examples of E1, E2 and E1cB reactions Alpha eliminations and generation of carbene I. Basics Elimination reactions involve the loss of fragments or groups from a molecule to generate multiple bonds. A generalized equation is shown below for 1,2-elimination wherein the X and Y from two adjacent carbon atoms are removed, elimination C C C C -XY X Y Three major types of elimination reactions are: α-elimination: two atoms or groups are removed from the same atom. It is also known as 1,1-elimination. H R R C X C + HX R Both H and X are removed from carbon atom here R Carbene β-elimination: loss of atoms or groups on adjacent atoms. It is also H H known as 1,2- elimination. R C C R R HC CH R X H γ-elimination: loss of atoms or groups from the 1st and 3rd positions as shown below.
  • S 1 Reaction Remember That a 3˚ Alkyl Halide Will Not Undergo a S 2 Reaction the Steric Hindrance in the Transition State

    S 1 Reaction Remember That a 3˚ Alkyl Halide Will Not Undergo a S 2 Reaction the Steric Hindrance in the Transition State

    SN1 Reaction Remember that a 3˚ alkyl halide will not undergo a SN2 reaction The steric hindrance in the transition state is too high If t-Butyl iodide is reacted with methanol, however, a substitution product is obtained This product does NOT proceed through a SN2 reaction First proof is that the rate for the reaction does not depend on methanol concentration Occurs through a SN1 reaction Substitution – Nucleophilic – Unimolecular (1) SN1 - In a SN1 reaction the leaving group departs BEFORE a nucleophile attacks For t-butyl iodide this generates a planar 3˚ carbocation The carbocation can then react with solvent (or nucleophile) to generate the product If solvent reacts (like the methanol as shown) the reaction is called a “solvolysis” The Energy Diagram for a SN1 Reaction therefore has an Intermediate - And is a two step reaction CH3 Potential H3C energy CH3 I OCH CH3 3 H3C CH3 CH3 H3C CH3 Reaction Coordinate Why does a SN1 Mechanism Occur? - Whenever the potential energy of a reaction is disfavored for a SN2 reaction the SN1 mechanism becomes a possibility SN2 SN1 Potential energy I OCH3 CH3 H3C CH3 CH3 H3C CH3 Reaction Coordinate Rate Characteristics The rate for a SN1 reaction is a first order reaction Rate = k [substrate] The first step is the rate determining step The nucleophile is NOT involved in the rate determining step Therefore the rate of a SN1 reaction is independent of nucleophile concentration (or nucleophile characteristics, e.g. strength) What is Important for a SN1 Reaction? The primary factor concerning the rate of
  • SUBSTITUTION and ELIMINATION REACTIONS Nucleophilic Substitution at Sp3 Carbon Substitution Is the Replacement of One Group by Another

    SUBSTITUTION and ELIMINATION REACTIONS Nucleophilic Substitution at Sp3 Carbon Substitution Is the Replacement of One Group by Another

    SUBSTITUTION AND ELIMINATION REACTIONS Nucleophilic Substitution at sp3 Carbon Substitution is the replacement of one group by another. The conversion of an alkyl halide into an alcohol is one of the most widely studied substitution reactions. _ _ OH R-X R-OH + X + OH- is called nucleophile and X- is called leaving group. A nucleophile is a reagent that brings an electron pair. Kinetic measurements on the reactions of alkyl halides with a number of different nucleophile show two extreme types. In the one type, Rate = k1[R-X] (1) And in the second type Rate = k2[R-X][Nu:] (2) In some cases the rate equations are found to be mixed or are complicated due to other reasons. Mechanisms The most common mechanisms of substitution reactions are SN1 and SN2 mechanisms. SN1 mechanism follows rate equation (1), i.e. first order kinetics while SN2 mechanism follows rate equation (2), i.e. second order kinetics. The SN2 Mechanism SN2 stands for substitution nucleophilic bimolecular. In this mechanism the nucleophile approaches the substrate from a position 180º away from the leaving group (backside attack). The reaction is a one step process with no intermediate. _ _ Y + C X Y C X Y C + X The C-Y bond is formed as the C-X bond is broken. The energy required to break the C-X bond is supplied by the simultaneous formation of the C-Y bond. During the formation of the transition state the hybridization of the carbon atom changes from sp3 to sp2 with an approximately perpendicular p-orbital.
  • Solvolysis Reaction Kinetics, Rates and Mechanism for Phenyl N-Phenyl Phosphoramidochloridate

    Solvolysis Reaction Kinetics, Rates and Mechanism for Phenyl N-Phenyl Phosphoramidochloridate

    Studies of Phenyl N-Phenyl Phosphoramidochloridate Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2014, Vol. 35, No. 8 2465 http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2014.35.8.2465 Solvolysis Reaction Kinetics, Rates and Mechanism for Phenyl N-Phenyl Phosphoramidochloridate Hojune Choi, Kiyull Yang, Han Joong Koh,†,* and In Sun Koo* Department of Chemistry Education and Research Instituted of Natural Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, Korea. *E-mail: [email protected] †Department of Science Education, Chonju National University of Education, Chonju, Korea. *E-mail: [email protected] Received March 29, 2014, Accepted April 29, 2014 The rate constants of solvolysis of phenyl N-phenyl phosphoramidochloridate (PhNHPO(Cl)OPh, Target Compound-TC1) have been determined by a conductivity method. The solvolysis rate constants of TC1 are well correlated with the extended Grunwald-Winstein equation, using the NT solvent nucleophilicity scale and YCl solvent ionizing scale, and sensitivity values of 0.85 ± 0.14 and 0.53 ± 0.04 for l and m, respectively. These l and m values were similar to those obtained previously for the complex chemical substances dimethyl thiophosphorochloridate; N,N,N',N'-tetramethyldiamidophosphorochloridate; 2-phenyl-2-ketoethyl tosylate; diphenyl thiophosphinyl chloride; and 9-fluorenyl chloroformate. As with the five previously studied solvolyses, an SN2 pathway is proposed for the solvolyses of TC1. For four representative solvents, the rate constants were measured at several temperatures, and activation parameters (∆H≠ and ∆S≠) were estimated. These activation parameters are also in line with the values expected for an SN2 reaction. Key Words : Phenyl N-phenyl phosphoramidochloridate, Extended Grunwald-Winstein equation, SN2 mech- anism, Activation parameters Introduction mediate or is the result of a single transition state (TS).2 The reaction mechanism of phosphoryl compounds, such Phosphoryl transfer is an important aspect of biological as that of ‘phenyl N-phenyl phosphoramidochloridate’ chemistry and organic synthesis.
  • Carbocation Catalysis for Organic Synthesis Shengjun Ni LIC

    Carbocation Catalysis for Organic Synthesis Shengjun Ni LIC

    Carbocation Catalysis for Organic Synthesis Shengjun Ni Doctoral Thesis LIC OR DOC Thesis Stockholm 201 year8 Akademisk avhandling som med tillstånd av Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan i Stockholm framlägges till offentlig granskning för avläggande av doktorsexamen i kemi med inriktning mot organisk kemi fredagen den 26 oktober kl 14.00 i sal F3, KTH, Lindstedtsvägen 26, Stockholm. Avhandlingen försvaras på engelska. Opponent är professor Bernd Plietker, Universität Stuttgart, Germany. ISBN 978-91-7729-966-0 ISSN 1654-1081 TRITA-CBH-FOU-2018:44 © Shengjun Ni, 2018 Universitetsservice US AB, Stockholm II Shengjun Ni, 2018: “Carbocation Catalysis for Organic Synthesis”, KTH Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden. Abstract The most common view of carbocations in organic chemistry is that they are short-lived intermediates in several fundamental reactions, e.g. the classic SN1-reaction. However, carbocations that can delocalize their positive charge can be stable enough to be isolated and used as Lewis acid catalysts, phase transfer catalysts or oxidants in various reactions. The theme of this thesis concerns applying trityl cations as Lewis acid catalysts in different organic reactions. The first chapter presents a general introduction of the field of Lewis acids, the characteristics and applications of carbocations in different organic reactions, and the aims of this thesis. The second chapter describes the carbocation-catalyzed asymmetric Diels– Alder reactions assisted by chiral counteranions. The third chapter shows that carbocations can be utilized as catalysts in oxa-Diels–Alder reactions with unactivated aldehydes and dienes as substrates. The fourth chapter investigates the application of carbocation catalysis in bromination reactions for selective functionalization at the benzylic position and on the aromatic ring, respectively.
  • Initial State and Transition State Solvation for the Solvolysis of ^Razis

    Initial State and Transition State Solvation for the Solvolysis of ^Razis

    宙시 State and Transition State Solvation for the Solvolysis of trans-[Co(N-ete^2ClJ^ Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.f Vol. 11, No. 4, 1990 309 aqueous HC1 solution. The reaction product was extracted 2, (a) H. Kotsuki, Y. Ushio, I. Kadota, and M. O산 ii,/ ()rg. three times with ether (20 ml x 3) and the organic옹 were Chem., 54, 5153 (1989); (b) H. Kots니 d, Y. Ushio, I. separated and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The Kadota, and M. Ochi, Chem. Lett., 927 (1988); (c) B. P. ether was removed by rotatory evaporator. The GLC ana­ M니 ndy and M. Bjorklund. Tetrahedron Lett., 26, 3899 lysis indicated an exo/endo ratio of 83:17 (quantitative yield). (1985); (d) H. A. Bates and P.-N. Deng, / ()rg. Chem., General procedure for endo-5,7-dimethyl-6,8-dioxabicy- 48, 4479 (1983). clo[3.2.1]octane (5). To a dried ZnCl2(2 eq.) was added drop­ 3, (a) B. P. Mundy and W. G. Bommann,/ ()rg. Chem., 49, wise 0.2 g (1.4 mmol) of methyl vinyl keton dimer (1) in 2 ml 5264 (1984); (b) T. Cohen and M. Bhupathy, Tetrahed- ) of CH2C12 and 3 eq. of Zn(BH4 2 (0.8M solution in THF) res­ ron Lett., 24, 4163 (1983); (c) P. Chaquin, J-P. Morizur, pectively at 0°C. After 2 hrs stirring at 0°C, 10 mZ of 15% and J. KossanyiJ. Am. Chem. Sog, 99,903(1977); (d) K. aqueous HC1 solution was added to this reaction mixture and Mori, Tetrahedron, 30, 4223 (1974).
  • View Is Primarily on Addressing the Issues of Non-Permanently Charged Reactivators and the Development of Treatments for Aged Ache

    View Is Primarily on Addressing the Issues of Non-Permanently Charged Reactivators and the Development of Treatments for Aged Ache

    Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Therapeutics for the Treatment of Organophosphorus Poisoning by Nerve Agents and Pesticides Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Andrew Joseph Franjesevic Graduate Program in Chemistry The Ohio State University 2019 Dissertation Committee Professor Christopher M. Hadad, Advisor Professor Thomas J. Magliery Professor David Nagib Professor Jonathan R. Parquette Copyrighted by Andrew Joseph Franjesevic 2019 2 Abstract Organophosphorus (OP) compounds, both pesticides and nerve agents, are some of the most lethal compounds known to man. Although highly regulated for both military and agricultural use in Western societies, these compounds have been implicated in hundreds of thousands of deaths annually, whether by accidental or intentional exposure through agricultural or terrorist uses. OP compounds inhibit the function of the enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and AChE is responsible for the hydrolysis of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine (ACh), and it is extremely well evolved for the task. Inhibition of AChE rapidly leads to accumulation of ACh in the synaptic junctions, resulting in a cholinergic crisis which, without intervention, leads to death. Approximately 70-80 years of research in the development, treatment, and understanding of OP compounds has resulted in only a handful of effective (and approved) therapeutics for the treatment of OP exposure. The search for more effective therapeutics is limited by at least three major problems: (1) there are no broad scope reactivators of OP-inhibited AChE; (2) current therapeutics are permanently positively charged and cannot cross the blood-brain barrier efficiently; and (3) current therapeutics are ineffective at treating the aged, or dealkylated, form of AChE that forms following inhibition of of AChE by various OPs.