DOCSLIB.ORG

Trends in Lithium-Ion Batteries for Aerospace Applications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trends in Lithium-Ion Batteries for Aerospace Applications YEARS TrendsTrends inin LithiumLithium--ionion BatteriesBatteries forfor AerospaceAerospace ApplicationsApplications Features, Performance, Research, & Development NASA Battery Workshop, Marshall Space Flight Center 27 November 2007 David Gallup Manager, Li-ion Space Systems Yardney Technical Products, Inc. / Lithion 860-599-1100 x494 82 Mechanic Street, Pawcatuck, CT 06379 www.yardney.com www.lithion.com Objectives of Presentation • Overview of Yardney-Lithion battery heritage, developments, applications, performance, & research • Overview of successful results of YTP’s Li-ion Domestic Source Program Yardney Space Heritage Spacecraft Customer Launcher Launch Date Mars Lander NASA/JPL No launch, but battery N/A fully tested & qualified MER Rover Spirit NASA/JPL Delta II June ‘03 MER Rover NASA/JPL Delta II July ‘03 Opportunity XSS-11 Lockheed Martin Minotaur April ‘05 X-37 NASA/AF Atmospheric Demo Various MISSE 5 NRL STS July ‘05 STP-R1 General Dynamics Minotaur Sept ‘05 MiTEx Lockheed Martin Delta II June ‘06 Yardney Space Heritage Spacecraft Customer Launcher Launch Date TacSat 2 Broadreach Eng Minotaur Dec ‘06 /AFRL Orbital Express Ball Aero Atlas V March ‘07 NEXTSat Orbital Express Boeing Atlas V March ‘07 ASTRO Phoenix Lockheed Martin/JPL Delta II August ‘07 Planned Launches BBP Boeing Not Specified Not Specified IBEX NASA/GSFC Pegasus 2008 Mars Science Lab NASA/JPL Delta IV/Atlas V 2009 NASA/JPL MER Rover Mission 2 x 28V, 10 Ah Lithium Ion Batteries • Spirit and Opportunity Energy Storage - Nighttime Power Source - Daytime Augmentation During Peak Loads - Design to Test in Nine Months • Program Extended Multiple Times - Initial Three Month Run-Time Requirement - Operating since Jan 04 – nominal performance Orbital Express Program 30Ah, 28V Li-Ion Battery - NEXTSat (BATC) 43 Ah, 28V Li-Ion Battery - ASTRO (Boeing) • DARPA Technology Demonstration – Validate the Feasibility of Autonomous Robotic Refueling and Reconfiguration – Selective Electronics for Cell Balancing (Automatic/Remote Activated) – Mission to swap NEXTSat Operational Replacement battery from one vehicle to another Boeing 43Ah ASTRO • Launched 8 March 2007 BATC 30 Ah NEXTSat NASA/JPL Phoenix Program Dual 28 Volt, 30 Ah Lithium-ion Battery System Program resurrected from 2001 Mars Lander – Martian Arctic Explorer - Fixed Lander • Determine whether Life ever arose on Mars • Characterize the Climate of Mars • Characterize the Geology of Mars • Prepare for Human Exploration Identical Design as Heritage Battery Customer -- Lockheed Martin Space Systems Launched - Aug 2007 Land - May 2008 NASA/JPL Mars Science Laboratory 2 x 28V, 20Ah Lithium-ion Batteries Design •Retain MER heritage Science •New Li-ion cell - scaled up version • Did/does Mars have of MER cell environmental conditions •20 Ah Nameplate capacity favorable to microbial life? •8S/2P Configuration • Launch schedule: Fall ‘09 •Chemistry identical to MER •JPL low temp electrolyte •No solar arrays – uses radioisotope power source 2009 MSL Rover 2005 MINI Cooper S Design Concept The Look Ahead Lithium-ion Batteries becoming baseline design –Increasing battery power –Increasing battery voltage –Improving cell capacities –Improving life performance –Improving design features High Power Batteries Comprised of (40) NCP55-2 cells in (8) series packs of (5) parallel cells (nom. 300Ah capacity) Voltage Range 24V to 34V Continuous Discharge 100A (C/3) High Voltage Batteries Comprised of (42) NCP12-2 cells in series (nom 12Ah) Voltage range 126V to 172V Peak Discharge capability 72A (6C) Cell Capacities Increasing Process improvements leading to performance improvements Cell Capacities Increasing Process improvements leading to performance improvements 4.2 4.1 4.0 Increase in NCP43-2 Cell Capacity 3.9 3.8 3.7 NCP43-2-321 3.6 lts NCP43-2-480 Vo 3.5 48.27Ah 3.4 3.3 3% BOL capacity growth 3.2 over 15 months 46.67Ah 3.1 3.0 2.9 0246810121416182022242628303234363840424446485052 Amp-Hours Cell Capacities Increasing Process improvements leading to performance improvements 4.2 4.1 4.0 Increase in NCP43-2 Cell Capacity 3.9 3.8 4.2 3.7 4.1 NCP43-2-321 3.6 Increase in NCP12-2 Cell Capacity lts NCP43-2-480 4.0 Vo 3.5 48.27Ah 3.9 3.4 3.8 3.3 3% BOL capacity growth 3.7 3.2 NCP12-2-476 over 15 months 46.67Ah s 3.6 NCP12-2-985 3.1 t Vol 3.5 3.0 13.60Ah 3.4 2.9 0246810121416182022242628303234363840424446485052 3.3 6% BOL capacity growth Amp-Hours 3.2 over 18 months 12.85A 3.1 3.0 2.9 0123456789101112131415 Amp-hours Cell LEO Cycle Testing DOD) ith NCP20 Cells 0.8519 = -3E-06x2 = + 3.4981 y R cling w LEO Cy (C/2 Discharge to 20% End of Discharge Voltage = -6E-06x2 = 0.8014 + 3.319 y R Linear regression modeling predicts 36000 3.6 cell EOL (3.0V) at 34000 32000 3.5 30000 ~ 53,000 cycles (3.7V) and ~ 166,000 cycles (3.9V) 28000 e 26000 g a 4 24000 lt 3. 9V 3. 7V) 22000 o 3. O t 7V o 20000 E o 3. O t 9V) rge Vo rge 3. 3 O t E o 18000 a 3. 315 L E O t h X 325 L E 16000 er 325 L (X sc i X ear 315 L 14000 in (X D 2 L 3. near 12000 ycle numb Li C 10000 End of End 8000 3.1 6000 4000 2000 3.0 0 HV Battery LEO Cycle Testing At a battery lower limit of 126V, the battery linear regression model predicts XEOL ≈ 35,200 cycles (8% DOD). 12Ah / 150V Battery Life Cycle Test Results End-of-Discharge Voltage 170 165 160 ) s 155 t ol y = -0.0011x + 164.77 (V 150 R2 = 0.7713 age t 145 Vol y 140 er tt a B 135 130 125 120 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 Cycle Number HV Battery LEO Cycle Testing At a lower limit of 3V, the cell linear regression model predicts XEOL≈ 30,700 cycles (8% DOD). 12Ah / 150V Battery Life Cycle Test Results End-of-Discharge Voltage (cells) 4.00 3.90 3.80 3.70 ) y = -3E-05x + 3.9218 ts l 3.60 R2 = 0.876 3.50 e (Vo g 3.40 Volta 3.30 Cell 3.20 3.10 3.00 2.90 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 Cycle Number LV Battery LEO Cycle Testing At a battery lower limit of 24V, the battery linear regression model predicts XEOL ≈ 32,800 cycles (20% DOD). 43Ah / 28V Battery Life Cycle Test Results End-of-Discharge Voltage 32.0 31.5 31.0 30.5 30.0 29.5 ts) l 29.0 y = -0.0002x + 30.568 o V 28.5 2 ( R = 0.8524 e 28.0 ltag 27.5 27.0 26.5 ery Vo 26.0 Batt 25.5 25.0 24.5 24.0 23.5 23.0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 Cycle Number LV Battery LEO Cycle Testing At a lower limit of 3V, the cell linear regression model forecasts XEOL ≈ 27,300 cycles (20% DOD). 43Ah / 28V Battery Life Cycle Test Results, End-of-Discharge Voltage (cells) 3.90 3.80 3.70 3.60 ) y = -3E-05x + 3.8184 olts 3.50 R2 = 0.8987 e (V 3.40 ag t l Vo 3.30 Cell 3.20 3.10 3.00 2.90 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 Cycle Number Electronics Externalization Modular Electronics Used with battery dummy for acceptance testing Simplified EMI protection Lends itself to rapid field replacement, eliminating need for depot-level service Electronics Research & Development Issues of: – Time & expense to develop unique electronics for different battery applications – Availability of certified space-grade electronics components for Space and Aerospace Applications. Electronics Research & Development Issues of: – Time & expense to develop unique electronics for different battery applications – Availability of certified space-grade electronics components for Space and Aerospace Applications. Significant Impacts on: – Schedule (12+ months for certain key components) – High Costs – NRE, component qualification Electronics Research & Development Issues of: – Time & expense to develop unique electronics for different battery applications – Availability of certified space-grade electronics components for Space and Aerospace Applications. Significant Impacts on: – Schedule (12+ months for certain key components) – Cost (high demand + scarce supply = high cost) These are industry-wide issues and impacts which affect all suppliers and consumers Electronics Research & Development Yardney Electronics Development Program – Significant expansion of in-house Electronics Development Group to bring engineering inside for increased control and flexibility Electronics Research & Development Yardney Electronics Development Program – Significant expansion of in-house Electronics Development Group to bring engineering inside for increased control and flexibility – Assess commonality between applications to identify ways to streamline development of electronics packages Electronics Research & Development Yardney Electronics Development Program – Significant expansion of in-house Electronics Development Group to bring engineering inside for increased control and flexibility – Assess commonality between applications to identify ways to streamline development of electronics packages – Development of “standard” design to reduce recurring costs and improve deliveries Electronics Research & Development Yardney Electronics Development Program – Significant expansion of in-house Electronics Development Group to bring engineering inside for increased control and flexibility – Assess commonality between applications to identify ways to streamline development of electronics packages – Development of “standard” design to reduce recurring costs and improve deliveries – Continuing efforts to resolve supply chain issues Materials Research: Active Materials Domestic Source Program Overseas source of supply for premium quality specially formulated Li-ion active materials lost for all aerospace battery vendors – Business decision to focus on much larger
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dod Space Technology Guide
    Foreword Space-based capabilities are integral to the U.S.’s national security operational doctrines and processes. Such capa- bilities as reliable, real-time high-bandwidth communica- tions can provide an invaluable combat advantage in terms of clarity of command intentions and flexibility in the face of operational changes. Satellite-generated knowledge of enemy dispositions and movements can be and has been exploited by U.S. and allied commanders to achieve deci- sive victories. Precision navigation and weather data from space permit optimal force disposition, maneuver, decision- making, and responsiveness. At the same time, space systems focused on strategic nuclear assets have enabled the National Command Authorities to act with confidence during times of crisis, secure in their understanding of the strategic force postures. Access to space and the advantages deriving from operat- ing in space are being affected by technological progress If our Armed Forces are to be throughout the world. As in other areas of technology, the faster, more lethal, and more precise in 2020 advantages our military derives from its uses of space are than they are today, we must continue to dynamic. Current space capabilities derive from prior invest in and develop new military capabilities. decades of technology development and application. Joint Vision 2020 Future capabilities will depend on space technology programs of today. Thus, continuing investment in space technologies is needed to maintain the “full spectrum dominance” called for by Joint Vision 2010 and 2020, and to protect freedom of access to space by all law-abiding nations. Trends in the availability and directions of technology clearly suggest that the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Submitted to Florida Institute of Technology in Partial Fulfllment of the Requirements for the Degree Of
    Dynamics of Spacecraft Orbital Refueling by Casey Clark Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering College of Engineering 2016 A thesis submitted to Florida Institute of Technology in partial fulfllment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering Melbourne, Florida July, 2018 ⃝c Copyright 2018 Casey Clark All Rights Reserved The author grants permission to make single copies. We the undersigned committee hereby approve the attached thesis Dynamics of Spacecraft Orbital Refueling by Casey Clark Dr. Tiauw Go, Sc.D. Associate Professor. Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Committee Chair Dr. Jay Kovats, Ph.D. Associate Professor Mathematics Outside Committee Member Dr. Markus Wilde, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Committee Member Dr. Hamid Hefazi, Ph.D. Professor and Department Head Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering ABSTRACT Title: Dynamics of Spacecraft Orbital Refueling Author: Casey Clark Major Advisor: Dr. Tiauw Go, Sc.D. A quantitative collation of relevant parameters for successfully completed exper- imental on-orbit fuid transfers and anticipated orbital refueling future missions is performed. The dynamics of connected satellites sustaining fuel transfer are derived by treating the connected spacecraft as a rigid body and including an in- ternal mass fow rate. An orbital refueling results in a time-varying local center of mass related to the connected spacecraft. This is accounted for by incorporating a constant mass fow rate in the inertia tensor. Simulations of the equations of motion are performed using the values of the parameters of authentic missions in an endeavor to provide conclusions regarding the efect of an internal mass transfer on the attitude of refueling spacecraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruimtewapens Schuldwoestijn Graffiti Without Gravity Van De Hoofdredacteur
    Ruimtewapens Schuldwoestijn Graffiti without Gravity Van de hoofdredacteur: Het zal u hopelijk niet ontgaan zijn dat, door de komst van het Space Studies Program (SSP) van de International Space University én een groot aantal evenementen in de regio Delft, Den Haag, Leiden en Noordwijk, het een bijzondere ruimtevaartzomer geweest is. Deze ‘Sizzling Summer of Space’ is nu echter toch echt afgelopen. In het volgende nummer staat een nabeschouwing over SSP in Nederland gepland, maar in dit nummer vindt u hiernaast al vast een bijzondere foto van de Koning met de deelnemers tijdens de openingsceremonie en een verslag van een side event gesponsord door de NVR. De voorstelling ‘Fly me to the Moon’ is ook door de NVR ondersteund en is bezocht door een aantal van onze leden. Het theaterstuk maakte mooi gebruik van de bijzondere omgeving van Decos op de Space Campus in Noordwijk. Op de Space Campus zelf zijn veel nieuwe ontwikkelingen gaande waaraan we in de nabije toekomst aandacht willen geven. Bij de voorplaat In dit nummer vindt u het eerste artikel uit een serie over ruimtewapens en een artikel over Gloveboxen dat we Het winnende kunstwerk van de ‘Graffiti without Gravity’ wedstrijd, overgenomen hebben, onder de samenwerkingsover- door Shane Sutton. [ESA/Hague Street Art/S. Sutton] eenkomst met de British Interplanetary Society, uit het blad Spaceflight. Het is goed als Nederlandse partijen zelf positief over hun producten zijn maar het is natuurlijk nog Foto van het kwartaal beter als een onafhankelijke buitenlandse publicatie dat opschrijft. Frappant is verder dat twee artikelen gerelateerd zijn aan lezingen bij het Ruimtevaart Museum in Lelystad, want zowel het boek Schuldwoestijn als het artikel over ruimtewapens zijn onderwerp van een lezing daar geweest.
    [Show full text]
  • STS-S26 Stage Set
    SatCom For Net-Centric Warfare September/October 2010 MilsatMagazine STS-S26 stage set Military satellites Kodiak Island Launch Complex, photo courtesy of Alaska Aerospace Corp. PAYLOAD command center intel Colonel Carol P. Welsch, Commander Video Intelligence ..................................................26 Space Development Group, Kirtland AFB by MilsatMagazine Editors ...............................04 Zombiesats & On-Orbit Servicing by Brian Weeden .............................................38 Karl Fuchs, Vice President of Engineering HI-CAP Satellites iDirect Government Technologies by Bruce Rowe ................................................62 by MilsatMagazine Editors ...............................32 The Orbiting Vehicle Series (OV1) by Jos Heyman ................................................82 Brig. General Robert T. Osterhaler, U.S.A.F. (Ret.) CEO, SES WORLD SKIES, U.S. Government Solutions by MilsatMagazine Editors ...............................76 India’s Missile Defense/Anti-Satellite NEXUS by Victoria Samson ..........................................82 focus Warfighter-On-The-Move by Bhumika Baksir ...........................................22 MILSATCOM For The Next Decade by Chris Hazel .................................................54 The First Line Of Defense by Angie Champsaur .......................................70 MILSATCOM In Harsh Conditions.........................89 2 MILSATMAGAZINE — SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2010 Video Intelligence ..................................................26 Zombiesats & On-Orbit
    [Show full text]
  • 10. Spacecraft Configurations MAE 342 2016
    2/12/20 Spacecraft Configurations Space System Design, MAE 342, Princeton University Robert Stengel • Angular control approaches • Low-Earth-orbit configurations – Satellite buses – Nanosats/cubesats – Earth resources satellites – Atmospheric science and meteorology satellites – Navigation satellites – Communications satellites – Astronomy satellites – Military satellites – Tethered satellites • Lunar configurations • Deep-space configurations Copyright 2016 by Robert Stengel. All rights reserved. For educational use only. 1 http://www.princeton.edu/~stengel/MAE342.html 1 Angular Attitude of Satellite Configurations • Spinning satellites – Angular attitude maintained by gyroscopic moment • Randomly oriented satellites and magnetic coil – Angular attitude is free to vary – Axisymmetric distribution of mass, solar cells, and instruments Television Infrared Observation (TIROS-7) Orbital Satellite Carrying Amateur Radio (OSCAR-1) ESSA-2 TIROS “Cartwheel” 2 2 1 2/12/20 Attitude-Controlled Satellite Configurations • Dual-spin satellites • Attitude-controlled satellites – Angular attitude maintained by gyroscopic moment and thrusters – Angular attitude maintained by 3-axis control system – Axisymmetric distribution of mass and solar cells – Non-symmetric distribution of mass, solar cells – Instruments and antennas do not spin and instruments INTELSAT-IVA NOAA-17 3 3 LADEE Bus Modules Satellite Buses Standardization of common components for a variety of missions Modular Common Spacecraft Bus Lander Congiguration 4 4 2 2/12/20 Hine et al 5 5 Evolution
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance, Navigation and Control System for Autonomous Proximity Operations and Docking of Spacecraft
    Scholars' Mine Doctoral Dissertations Student Theses and Dissertations Summer 2009 Guidance, navigation and control system for autonomous proximity operations and docking of spacecraft Daero Lee Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/doctoral_dissertations Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons Department: Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Recommended Citation Lee, Daero, "Guidance, navigation and control system for autonomous proximity operations and docking of spacecraft" (2009). Doctoral Dissertations. 1942. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/doctoral_dissertations/1942 This thesis is brought to you by Scholars' Mine, a service of the Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION AND CONTROL SYSTEM FOR AUTONOMOUS PROXIMITY OPERATIONS AND DOCKING OF SPACECRAFT by DAERO LEE A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in AEROSPACE ENGINEERING 2009 Approved by Henry Pernicka, Advisor Jagannathan Sarangapani Ashok Midha Robert G. Landers Cihan H Dagli 2009 DAERO LEE All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT This study develops an integrated guidance, navigation and control system for use in autonomous proximity operations and docking of spacecraft. A new approach strategy is proposed based on a modified system developed for use with the International Space Station. It is composed of three “V-bar hops” in the closing transfer phase, two periods of stationkeeping and a “straight line V-bar” approach to the docking port.
    [Show full text]
  • This Version of the Database Includes Launches Through July 31, 2020
    This version of the Database includes launches through July 31, 2020. There are currently 2,787 active satellites in the database. The changes to this version of the database include: • The addition of 247 satellites • The deletion of 126 satellites • The addition of and corrections to some satellite data Additions and Deletions for UCS Satellite Database Release August 1, 2020 Deletions for August 1, 2020 Release ZA-Aerosat – 1998-067LU Nsight-1 – 1998-067MF ASTERIA – 1998-067NH INMARSAT 3-F1 – 1996-020A INMARSAT 3-F2 – 1996-053A Navstar GPS SVN 60 (USA 178) – 2004-023A RapidEye-1 – 2008-040C RapidEye-2 – 2008-040A RapidEye-3 – 2008-040D RapidEye-4 – 2008-040E RapidEye-5 – 2008-040B Dove 2 – 2013-015c Dove 3 – 2013-066P Dove 1c-10 – 2014-033P Dove 1c-7 – 2014-033S Dove 1c-1 – 2014-033T Dove 1c-2 – 2014-033V Dove 1c-4 – 2014-033X Dove 1c-11 – 2014-033Z Dove 1c-9 – 2014-033AB Dove 1c-6 – 2014-033AC Dove 1c-5 – 2014-033AE Dove 1c-8 – 2014-033AG Dove 1c-3 – 2014-033AH Dove 3m-1 – 2016-040J Dove 2p-11 – 2016-040K Dove 2p-2 – 2016-040L Dove 2p-4 – 2016-040N Dove 2p-7 – 2016-040S Dove 2p-5 – 2016-040T Dove 2p-1 – 2016-040U Dove 3p-37 – 2017-008F Dove 3p-19 – 2017-008H Dove 3p-18 – 2017-008K Dove 3p-22 – 2017-008L Dove 3p-21 – 2017-008M Dove 3p-28 – 2017-008N Dove 3p-26 – 2017-008P Dove 3p-17 – 2017-008Q Dove 3p-27 – 2017-008R Dove 3p-25 – 2017-008S Dove 3p-1 – 2017-008V Dove 3p-6 – 2017-008X Dove 3p-7 – 2017-008Y Dove 3p-5 – 2017-008Z Dove 3p-9 – 2017-008AB Dove 3p-10 – 2017-008AC Dove 3p-75 – 2017-008AH Dove 3p-73 – 2017-008AK Dove 3p-36 –
    [Show full text]
  • BALL CONFIGURABLE PLATFORM the Combined BCP Series Has Flown for Under Fixed-Price Or Cost-Reimbursable More Than an Equivalent of 85 Years — Contract Types
    FEATURES PROVEN RELIABILITY the-art technology demonstration missions, BALL CONFIGURABLE PLATFORM The combined BCP series has flown for under fixed-price or cost-reimbursable more than an equivalent of 85 years — contract types. consistently exceeding spacecraft’s design life A WIDE RANGE OF MISSIONS — demonstrating Ball’s commitment to quality and reliability at an affordable price. The highly agile Ball Aerospace BCP spacecraft line meets customer needs CONSISTENT, INCREMENTAL from initial technology development to ENHANCEMENT prototype demonstration to full, operational mission. The BCP line is flown in a variety Ball continuously evolves our BCP spacecraft of orbits with a wide assortment of family. A long and dependable BCP history payloads, including electro-optical payloads enables incremental improvements to the (imagers and limb scanners) with high spacecraft capability with a focus on reduced accuracy pointing requirements. As a space cost; including high-power systems, low- instrument developer, Ball Aerospace applies mass energy storage/ generation subsystems, its payload/instrument accommodation higher agility, advanced propulsion and higher experience to deliver end-to-end space capacity telecommunications. This approach systems. Our experience gives Ball to spacecraft design, development and Aerospace a mission systems expertise that manufacturing enables Ball to confidently translates into a proven ability to fulfill the support operational missions and state-of- most challenging mission requirements. 2014 Upcoming Launches WorldView-3 GPIM Q2 2018 2009 WorldView-2 2007 BCP 5000 BCP WorldView-1 122 2017 JPSS-1 Design Life 2011 Months Actual Suomi NPP Still Operating as of Dec. 2017 2010 SBSS 2009 Kepler 105 2006 CloudSat 139 Deep Impact 2005 104 EPOXI 2003 BCP 2000 BCP ICESat 2001 QuickBird 160 1999 QuikSCAT 221 1998 GFO 130 1995 RADARSAT 210 When challenging missions require payload and spacecraft 2009 ® WISE GO BEYOND WITH BALL.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellites Added and Deleted for July 1, 2010 Release This Version of the Database Includes Satellites Launched Through July 1, 2010
    Satellites Added and Deleted for July 1, 2010 release This version of the database includes satellites launched through July 1, 2010. The changes to this version of the database include: • The addition of 18 satellites • The deletion of 4 satellites • The addition of and corrections to some satellite data Satellites Added Cryosat-2 – 2010-013A Kobalt-M [Cosmos 2462] – 2010-014A X-37B OTV-1 [USA 212) – 2010-015A SES 1 – 2010-016A Parus-99 [Cosmos 2463] – 2010-017A Astra 3B – 2010-021A ComsatBw-2 – 2010-021B Navstar GPS 62 [USA 213] – 2010-022A SERVIS 2 – 2010-023A Compass G-3 – 2010-024A Arabsat 5B – 2010-025A Shijian-12 – 2010-027A Picard – 2010-028A PRISMA – 2010-028B TanDEM-X – 2010-030A Ofeq 9 – 2010-031A COMS-1 – 2010-032A Arabsat 5A – 2010-032B Satellites Removed LES-9 – 1976-023B Galaxy-9 -- 1996-033A SERVIS-1 – 2003-050A Galaxy-15 – 2005-041A Satellites Added and Deleted for April 1, 2010 release This version of the database includes satellites launched through April 1, 2010. The changes to this version of the database include: • The addition of 12 satellites • The deletion of 10 satellites • The addition of and corrections to some satellite data Satellites Added Beidou 3 – 2010-001A Raduga 1M – 2010-002A SDO (Solar Dynamics Observatory) – 2010-005A Intelsat 16 – 2010-006A Glonass 731 [Cosmos 2459] – 2010-007A Glonass 735 [Cosmos 2461] – 2010-007B Glonass 732 [Cosmos 2460] – 2010-007C GOES-15 [GOES-P] – 2010-008A Yaogan 9A – 2010-009A Yaogan 9B – 2010-009B Yaogan 9C – 2010-009C Echostar 14 – 2010-010A Satellites Removed Thaicom-1A – 1993-078B Intelsat-4 – 1995-040A Eutelsat W2 – 1998-056A Raduga 1-5 [Cosmos 2372] – 2000-049A IceSat – 2003-002A Raduga 1-7 [Cosmos 2406] – 2004-010A Glonass 713 [Cosmos 2418) – 2005-050B Yaogan-1 – 2006-015A CAPE-1 – 2007-012P Beidou-2 [Compass G2] – 2009-018A Satellites Added and Deleted for January 1, 2010 release This version of the database includes satellites launched through January 1, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to the Database for May 1, 2021 Release This Version of the Database Includes Launches Through April 30, 2021
    Changes to the Database for May 1, 2021 Release This version of the Database includes launches through April 30, 2021. There are currently 4,084 active satellites in the database. The changes to this version of the database include: • The addition of 836 satellites • The deletion of 124 satellites • The addition of and corrections to some satellite data Satellites Deleted from Database for May 1, 2021 Release Quetzal-1 – 1998-057RK ChubuSat 1 – 2014-070C Lacrosse/Onyx 3 (USA 133) – 1997-064A TSUBAME – 2014-070E Diwata-1 – 1998-067HT GRIFEX – 2015-003D HaloSat – 1998-067NX Tianwang 1C – 2015-051B UiTMSAT-1 – 1998-067PD Fox-1A – 2015-058D Maya-1 -- 1998-067PE ChubuSat 2 – 2016-012B Tanyusha No. 3 – 1998-067PJ ChubuSat 3 – 2016-012C Tanyusha No. 4 – 1998-067PK AIST-2D – 2016-026B Catsat-2 -- 1998-067PV ÑuSat-1 – 2016-033B Delphini – 1998-067PW ÑuSat-2 – 2016-033C Catsat-1 – 1998-067PZ Dove 2p-6 – 2016-040H IOD-1 GEMS – 1998-067QK Dove 2p-10 – 2016-040P SWIATOWID – 1998-067QM Dove 2p-12 – 2016-040R NARSSCUBE-1 – 1998-067QX Beesat-4 – 2016-040W TechEdSat-10 – 1998-067RQ Dove 3p-51 – 2017-008E Radsat-U – 1998-067RF Dove 3p-79 – 2017-008AN ABS-7 – 1999-046A Dove 3p-86 – 2017-008AP Nimiq-2 – 2002-062A Dove 3p-35 – 2017-008AT DirecTV-7S – 2004-016A Dove 3p-68 – 2017-008BH Apstar-6 – 2005-012A Dove 3p-14 – 2017-008BS Sinah-1 – 2005-043D Dove 3p-20 – 2017-008C MTSAT-2 – 2006-004A Dove 3p-77 – 2017-008CF INSAT-4CR – 2007-037A Dove 3p-47 – 2017-008CN Yubileiny – 2008-025A Dove 3p-81 – 2017-008CZ AIST-2 – 2013-015D Dove 3p-87 – 2017-008DA Yaogan-18
    [Show full text]
  • 59Th International Astronautical Congress
    8-25-08 draft 59th International Astronautical Congress IAC-08-A5.3.6 ARES V AND FUTURE VERY LARGE LAUNCH VEHICLES TO ENABLE MAJOR ASTRONOMICAL MISSIONS Harley A. Thronson Astrophysics Science Division NASA Goddard Space Flight Center [email protected] Daniel F. Lester Department of Astronomy University of Texas [email protected] Stephanie R. Langhoff Chief Scientist NASA Ames Research Center [email protected] Randy Correll Ball AeroSpace [email protected] H. Philip Stahl NASA Marshall Space Flight Center [email protected] 1 8-25-08 draft ABSTRACT The current NASA architecture intended to return humans to the lunar surface includes the Ares V cargo launch vehicle, which is planned to be available within a decade. The capabilities designed for Ares V would permit an 8.8-m diameter, 55 mT payload to be carried to Sun-Earth L1,2 locations. That is, this vehicle could launch very large optical systems to achieve major scientific goals that would otherwise be very difficult. For example, an 8-m monolith UV/visual/IR telescope appears able to be launched to a Sun-Earth L2 location. Even larger apertures that are deployed or assembled seem possible. Alternatively, multiple elements of a spatial array or two or three astronomical observatories might be launched simultaneously. Over the years, scientists and engineers have been evaluating concepts for astronomical observatories that use future large launch vehicles. In this presentation, we report on results of a recent workshop held at NASA Ames Research Center that have improved understanding of the science goals that can be achieved using Ares V.
    [Show full text]
  • Odqnv11i2.Pdf
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Orbital Debris Quarterly News Volume 11, Issue 2 April 2007 United Nations Adopts Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines During its annual meeting in February 2007, Guideline 1: Limit debris released during normal Inside... the Scientifi c and Technical Subcommittee (STSC) operations of the United Nations’ (UN) Committee on the Space systems should be designed not to release Chinese Anti-satellite Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) adopted debris during normal operations. If this is not feasible, Test Creates Most by consensus a comprehensive set of space debris the effect of any release of debris on the outer space Severe Orbital Debris mitigation guidelines designed to curtail the growth environment should be minimized. Cloud in History .........2 of the Earth’s orbital debris population. The new document culminates a multi-year work plan Guideline 2: Minimize the potential for break-ups Four Satellite involving the review of space debris mitigation during operational phases guidelines by the Inter-Agency Space Debris Spacecraft and launch vehicle orbital stages Breakups in February Coordination Committee (IADC) and the drafting should be designed to avoid failure modes which Add to Debris of a similar set of guidelines for Member States of may lead to accidental break-ups. In the case that a Population ..................3 the UN and other international organizations. condition leading to such a failure is detected, disposal Space debris has been a topic on the agenda of and passivation measures should be planned and The NASA Liquid the STSC since 1994. After several years discussing executed to avoid break-ups.
    [Show full text]