The Covid-19 Pandemic and Conflict Dynamics in Syria

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Covid-19 Pandemic and Conflict Dynamics in Syria NO. 21 MAY 2020 Introduction The Covid-19 Pandemic and Conflict Dynamics in Syria Neither a Turning Point Nor an Overall Determinant Muriel Asseburg, Hamidreza Azizi, Galip Dalay and Moritz Pieper Nine years into the (civil) war, Syria is in an extraordinarily poor position to confront the Covid-19 pandemic. Instead of the pandemic leading towards the uniting of local, regional, and international actors involved in Syria around a common purpose, con- flict dynamics have hampered an effective response to Covid-19. Yet, the pandemic is unlikely to become a decisive turning point in conflict dynamics or an overall deter- minant of its future trajectory. Rather, in the mid-term, the relevant actors are likely to continue to follow their strategic interests in Syria, while some will have to adjust their operational priorities, as well as the strategies to pursue them, against the back- drop of the pandemic. Cooperation among external actors in solving the conflict is not set to get any easier. Trends of destabilisation and erosion of state capacity in the war-torn country are also likely to continue. Europeans should prioritise helping fight the pandemic in all areas of Syria and re-engage in diplomacy aimed at conflict settlement and the prevention of military escalation among involved actors. At first glance, it seems as if Syria has not overall testing and the difficulties of con- been severely affected by the Covid-19 pan- fronting the pandemic and its fallout in the demic as of today. According to official war-torn and fragmented country. figures of the Syrian Ministry of Health, by 5 May 2020, there were 44 Syrians who had tested positive, 3 had died of the virus, and Pandemic Hits a Country in Crisis 27 had recovered. On 30 April, the Kurdish- dominated self-administration in the north- After nine years of (civil) war, Syria is in east of the country announced two more an extremely poor position to confront the cases; the oppositional Syrian Interim Gov- pandemic, putting Syrians at very high risk. ernment, nominally in control of the north- The country’s health system as well as the west, reported no infections until 3 May. energy, water, and sanitation infrastructure Yet, these numbers are unlikely to be reli- have been largely destroyed in nine years able indicators of the pandemic’s spread in of fighting, in particular in former and cur- Syria. Rather, they reflect the low level of rent rebel-held areas. The Syrian Arab Army and Russia’s air force have both deliberately Conflict Dynamics Impede targeted hospitals, clinics, and health work- Confronting Covid-19 Challenges ers. According to the UN, at the outbreak of the pandemic, only 57 hospitals and clinics Rather than the pandemic uniting local, were fully operational in Syria. In early regional, and international actors around March 2020, there were an estimated 325 a common purpose, conflict dynamics have ICUs with ventilators available throughout hampered an effective response to Covid- the country. These were distributed very 19. The fragmentation of territorial control unevenly, with some two-thirds in Damas- in Syria – between Damascus and its cus and the provinces of Latakia and Tar- backers (Russia, Iran, Iran-backed militias); tous, i.e. the regime heartlands, and none the Kurdish dominated self-administration in Deir ez-Zor. Even those hospitals and and its supporters (mainly a reduced num- clinics that are operational lack equipment, ber of US troops); Turkey and allied militias; trained personnel, and medicine. as well as the Syrian Salvation Government Also, against the backdrop of a severe linked to Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), an economic crisis in Syria – exacerbated al-Qaida offshoot of Salafist jihadis – and by the financial crisis in Lebanon – state continued conflict between the players revenues have been severely reduced, leav- have rendered a joint or coordinated ap- ing few resources for Damascus to upscale proach to Covid-19 impossible. Also, none health capacities and cushion the impact of the crucial external actors has changed of preventive measures on the population, course so as to allow for an effective tack- thus further increasing dependency on ling of the humanitarian needs resulting international humanitarian aid. With an from the pandemic. expected drop in the remittances on which In addition, interventions by international many Syrians depend and the impact of humanitarian actors have been severely lockdown measures, living conditions are hampered by the lack of access to territories set to worsen. Already before the epidemic outside the control of Damascus. This prob- hit the country, according to the UN, more lem has been compounded by restrictions than 80 per cent of the population was liv- on mobility imposed by Damascus and de ing below the poverty line, some 11 million facto authorities to contain the pandemic Syrians were receiving humanitarian assis- as well as by the closure of two border cross- tance, and some 8 million of them were ings (al-Ya’rubiya on the border with Iraq, dependent on food aid. al-Ramtha on the border with Jordan, both The risk of being affected by Covid-19 formerly used for international cross-border is highest for some 6 million internally dis- aid to circumvent Damascus) based on Secu- placed persons (IDPs), around 130,000 de- rity Council Resolution 2504 of January tainees in regime prisons, and tens of thou- 2020. It has also been magnified by inter- sands of suspected Islamic State (IS) fighters national actors such as the WHO relying and their families detained by the Kurdish- on Damascus as their main counterpart dominated Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in addressing the Covid-19 challenge while in camps and detention facilities. Most of avoiding to deal with de facto authorities these vulnerable groups live in cramped in the north-west and north-east of the conditions that do not allow for social dis- country. The problem has been especially tancing, they lack access to health services, stark east of the Euphrates, where the WHO suffer from catastrophic hygienic condi- shunned contacts and refrained from aid tions, and often do not even have access to deliveries until mid-April 2020. What is clean water. A spread of the virus among more, Damascus and Ankara have both IDPs, prisoners, and detainees would be used the denial of access to north-east Syria next to impossible to contain and lead to for humanitarian actors and aid deliveries large numbers of fatalities. as a means of putting pressure on the Kurd- ish-dominated self-administration to, re- SWP Comment 21 May 2020 2 spectively, agree to a deal on terms set by (attempted) prison outbreaks, in particular Damascus or respect Turkey’s red lines. from the SDF’s detention facilities. Turkey has also repeatedly withheld drink- ing water to areas in the north-east. In the same vein, humanitarian access to the Covid-19 Impacts the Rukban Camp on the Jordanian border has Military Balance of Power been denied by Damascus (and by Russian troops stationed in the area) to increase the Actors involved in the Syrian conflict have pressure on US-backed rebels in the enclave been impacted differently by the pandemic, to surrender. In the wake of the pandemic, depending on how much they have been Jordan also no longer allows direct cross- afflicted by Covid-19, the repercussions on border aid deliveries to the camp. available resources (e.g. state revenues), and Measures adopted by local actors to con- the manner of involvement in the conflict tain the spread of the virus and prepare (e.g. reliance on ground troops vs. air force). for dealing with infections have also been The respective impacts have reflected on undermined by conflict dynamics. The actors’ military capabilities, and thus on the government of Syria and de facto authori- overall military power balance. In contrast, ties in other parts of the country have each the pandemic has not had a pacifying effect. adopted similar, yet uncoordinated meas- As a case in point, some observers have ures to prevent the spread of the pandemic, held that one effect of the pandemic is such as: a partial closure of borders, mob- that a cease-fire in Idlib province has lasted ility restrictions, curfews, the suspension of longer than originally expected. Yet, it seems non-essential economic activities, the intro- that the relative calm in the area agreed duction of part-time hours for the public upon is less a direct effect of involved actors sector, and the closure of schools and uni- adjusting to Covid-19 than an expression of versities. Two communities that turned out the main parties – in particular, Turkey, to be hotspots of infections (Manin and al- HTS, and Damascus and its backers – pre- Sayyada Zainab) have been quarantined to paring for the next round of fighting so as prevent the spread of the virus. Damascus to defend what each sees as vital interests. has also granted amnesty to criminals and The limited ceasefire arrangement agreed defectors (although to date no meaningful upon by Russia and Turkey on 5 March release of prisoners has been registered) and 2020 was to establish a secure corridor postponed parliamentary elections that had along the M4 motorway connecting Latakia been scheduled for mid-April. Damascus on the coast and Aleppo, Syria’s commer- and the SDF apparently have suspended cial centre. Although it stopped the regime’s military recruitment, and the SDF declared offensive aimed at re-conquering the whole a unilateral cease-fire. Yet, border closures of the former de-escalation zone, it did not and travel restrictions have been under- provide lasting arrangements for any of the mined by the continued movement of fight- points of contention.
Recommended publications
  • Security Council Distr.: General 24 August 2016
    United Nations S/2016/738/Rev.1 Security Council Distr.: General 24 August 2016 Original: English Letter dated 24 August 2016 from the Secretary-General addressed to the President of the Security Council I have the honour to convey herewith the third report of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons-United Nations Joint Investigative Mechanism. I should be grateful if the present letter and the report could be brought to the attention of the members of the Security Council. (Signed) BAN Ki-moon 16-14878 (E) 140916 *1614878* S/2016/738/Rev.1 Letter dated 24 August 2016 from the Leadership Panel of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons- United Nations Joint Investigative Mechanism addressed to the Secretary-General The Leadership Panel of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons-United Nations Joint Investigative Mechanism has the honour to transmit the Mechanism’s third report pursuant to Security Council resolution 2235 (2015). The report provides an update on the activities of the Mechanism up to 19 August 2016. It also outlines the concluding assessments of the Leadership Panel to date, on the basis of the results of the investigation into the nine selected cases of the use of chemicals as weapons in the Syrian Arab Republic. The Leadership Panel wishes to thank the Secretary-General for the confidence placed in it. The Panel appreciates the indispensable support provided by the Secretariat, including the Office for Disarmament Affairs, the Department for Political Affairs and the Office of Legal Affairs, and the United Nations officials who have assisted the Mechanism in New York, Geneva and Damascus.
    [Show full text]
  • EUI RSCAS Working Paper 2021/08 How Global Jihad Relocalises And
    RSC 2021/08 Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Middle East Directions Programme How Global Jihad Relocalises and Where it Leads. The Case of HTS, the Former AQ Franchise in Syria Jerome Drevon and Patrick Haenni European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Middle East Directions Programm How Global Jihad Relocalises and Where it Leads. The Case of HTS, the Former AQ Franchise in Syria Jerome Drevon and Patrick Haenni EUI Working Paper RSC 2021/08 Terms of access and reuse for this work are governed by the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC- BY 4.0) International license. If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the working paper series and number, the year and the publisher. ISSN 1028-3625 © Jerome Drevon and Patrick Haenni, 2021 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY 4.0) International license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published in January 2021 by the European University Institute. Badia Fiesolana, via dei Roccettini 9 I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy Views expressed in this publication reflect the opinion of individual author(s) and not those of the European University Institute. This publication is available in Open Access in Cadmus, the EUI Research Repository: https://cadmus.eui.eu Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, created in 1992 and currently directed by Professor Brigid Laffan, aims to develop inter-disciplinary and comparative research on the major issues facing the process of European integration, European societies and Europe’s place in 21st century global politics.
    [Show full text]
  • A Turkish Perspective on Syria
    A Turkish Perspective on Syria Ercan Çitlioğlu Introduction The war is not over, but the overall military victory of the Assad forces in the Syrian conflict — securing the control of the two-thirds of the country by the Summer of 2020 — has meant a shift of attention on part of the regime onto areas controlled by the SDF/PYD and the resurfacing of a number of issues that had been temporarily taken off the agenda for various reasons. Diverging aims, visions and priorities of the key actors to the Syrian conflict (Russia, Turkey, Iran and the US) is making it increasingly difficult to find a common ground and the ongoing disagreements and rivalries over the post-conflict reconstruction of the country is indicative of new difficulties and disagreements. The Syrian regime’s priority seems to be a quick military resolution to Idlib which has emerged as the final stronghold of the armed opposition and jihadist groups and to then use that victory and boosted morale to move into areas controlled by the SDF/PYD with backing from Iran and Russia. While the east of the Euphrates controlled by the SDF/PYD has political significance with relation to the territorial integrity of the country, it also carries significant economic potential for the future viability of Syria in holding arable land, water and oil reserves. Seen in this context, the deal between the Delta Crescent Energy and the PYD which has extended the US-PYD relations from military collaboration onto oil exploitation can be regarded both as a pre-emptive move against a potential military operation by the Syrian regime in the region and a strategic shift toward reaching a political settlement with the SDF.
    [Show full text]
  • Erkenntnismittelliste Syrien
    VERWALTUNGSGERICHT STADE Verzeichnis der vorhandenen Materialien über die Arabische Republik Syrien - 10. Kammer - Stand: 16.09.2021 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Das Gericht beabsichtigt, gemäß § 86 VwGO die genannten Materialien gegebenenfalls zur Entscheidung heranzuziehen. Falls Sie Einsicht in ein nicht frei verfügbares Erkenntnismit- tel benötigen, wenden Sie sich bitte an die Service-Einheit der 10. Kammer. I. Auswärtiges Amt A. Lageberichte 01.04.2004 13.12.2004 14.07.2005 17.03.2006 26.02.2007 05.05.2008 09.07.2009 28.12.2009 (Ad-hoc Ergänzungsbericht) 07.04.2010 (Ad-hoc Ergänzungsbericht) 27.09.2010 17.02.2012 (Ad-hoc-Bericht) 13.11.2018 Stand: November 2018 kein regulärer Asyllagebericht; Er- stellung im Hinblick auf die IMK im November 2018 20.11.2019 Stand: November 2019 kein regulärer Asyllagebericht; Er- stellung im Hinblick auf die IMK im Dezember 2019 19.05.2020 Fortschreibung des Berichts über die Lage in der Arabischen Republik Sy- rien vom November 2019 (Stand: Mai 2020), kein regulärer Asyllage- bericht; Erstellung im Hinblick auf die IMK im Juni 2020 04.12.2020 Bericht über die Lage in der Arabischen Republik Syrien (Stand: November 2020), kein regulärer Asyllagebericht; Erstellung im Hin- blick auf die IMK im Dezember 2020 - 2 - B. Auskünfte Datum Adressat Inhalt 14.01.2004 VG Darmstadt staatenlose Kurden; rot-orange- nes Plastikdokument; Wehr- dienst 14.01.2004 VG Darmstadt staatenlose Kurden; Ausweispa- piere; Bescheinigung des Orts- vorstehers; rot-orangene Plas- tikkarte; Maktumin 14.01.2004 VG Darmstadt Echtheit Personaldokument - Wehrdienst staatenloser Kurden 19.01.2004 VG Darmstadt Identitätsbescheinigung eines Mukhtars; geringer Beweiswert 19.01.2004 VG Bayreuth Identitätsbescheinigung; Volkszäh- lung 1962; rot-orangene Plastikkar- ten 04.03.2004 VG Braunschweig Ehrenmorde; Familienehre; Az.
    [Show full text]
  • SYRIA - Idleb and Surrounding Areas for Humanitarian Purpose Only Camps and Sites - August 2019 16 September 2019
    SYRIA - Idleb and Surrounding Areas For Humanitarian Purpose Only Camps and Sites - August 2019 16 September 2019 IDPs in assessed Camps Assessed 775,176IDPs in assessed 301,278 IDPs live in 1,399& Sites 586Communities camps and sites unregistered camps Methodology The main objective of this assessment was to gather information on the type and number of sites as well as number of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) in Idleb and surrounding areas. Data was collected between 18 and 29 August 2019 by REACH enumerators who surveyed one Key Informant (KI) per community on IDP camps and sites nearest to their community. In order to qualify as camp or site, a site had to have 5 or more IDP households living on its premises. In total, 586 communities were assessed on 1,399 camps and sites. IDP numbers are registered numbers when available and KI estimates when not. KIs were selected for their expertise and knowledge on the camps and sites surrounding their community. IDP numbers solely represent IDPs in planned camps, informal settlements, collective centres, and transit reception centres, and do not account for IDPs within host communities. Camps and sites nearest to assessed communities Atma Qah Total reported IDPs Total reported number Deir Hassan in camps and sites of camps and sites HARITAN - Darhashan Aqrabat DANA <100 No camp or site reported TURKEY Big Hir Jamus DARET AZZA M4 Aleppo 1 camp or site Sarmada 100 - 1,000 HARIM QOURQEENA Tal Elkaramej Bab El Hawa JEBEL SAMAN SALQIN 1,001 - 10,000 Batbu KAFR ATAREB TAKHARIM 10,001 - 20,000 MAARET M4 TAMSRIN ARMANAZ TEFTNAZ > 20,000 140camps and sites DARKOSH BENNSH ZARBAH Kherbet Eljoz Idleb Camps and sites south of M4 motorway IDLEB JANUDIYEH SARMIN M4 Assessed sub-district M4 Sub-district boundary SARAQAB 49,000 IDPs in 132 informal JISR-ASH-SHUGUR BADAMA ARIHA settlements and collective MHAMBAL Governorate ABUL THOHUR centres live south of the M4 highway and are susceptible to further displacement if EHSEM escalation of conflict continues.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter Dated 22 September 2020 from the President Of
    United Nations S/2020/936 Security Council Distr.: General 23 September 2020 Original: English and French Letter dated 22 September 2020 from the President of the Security Council addressed to the Secretary-General and the Permanent Representatives of the members of the Security Council I have the honour to enclose herewith a copy of the briefing provided by Mr. Geir Pedersen, Special Envoy of the Secretary-General for Syria, as well as the statements delivered by the representatives of Belgium, China, Estonia, France, Germany, Indonesia, the Niger, the Russian Federation, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, South Africa, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America and Viet Nam, in connection with the video- teleconference on the situation in the Middle East (Syria), convened on Friday, 18 September 2020. A statement was also delivered by the representative of the Syrian Arab Republic. In accordance with the procedure set out in the letter dated 7 May 2020 from the President of the Security Council addressed to Permanent Representatives of the members of the Security Council (S/2020/372), which was agreed in the light of the extraordinary circumstances caused by the coronavirus disease pandemic, the briefings and statements will be issued as an official document of the Security Council. (Signed) Abdou Abarry President of the Security Council 20-12402 (E) 230920 031120 *2012402* S/2020/936 Annex I Statement by the Special Envoy of the Secretary-General for Syria, Geir Pedersen I begin today’s briefing by recalling, as I did last month (see S/2020/823), the deep suffering of the Syrian people, who, in this almost full decade of conflict, have experienced death, injury, displacement, destruction, detention, torture, terror, indignities, instability, de-development and destitution on a massive scale.
    [Show full text]
  • The YPG/‌PYD During the Syrian Conflict
    Henchman, Rebel, Democrat, Terrorist The YPG/ PYD during the Syrian conflict CRU Report Rena Netjes Erwin van Veen Henchman, Rebel, Democrat, Terrorist The YPG/ PYD during the Syrian conflict Rena Netjes Erwin van Veen CRU Report April 2021 April 2021 © Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. Cover photo: Kurdish PKK Guerilla © Flickr/Kurdishstruggle All other photos were made by Rena Netjes Unauthorized use of any materials violates copyright, trademark and / or other laws. Should a user download material from the website or any other source related to the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, or the Clingendael Institute, for personal or non-commercial use, the user must retain all copyright, trademark or other similar notices contained in the original material or on any copies of this material. Material on the website of the Clingendael Institute may be reproduced or publicly displayed, distributed or used for any public and non-commercial purposes, but only by mentioning the Clingendael Institute as its source. Permission is required to use the logo of the Clingendael Institute. This can be obtained by contacting the Communication desk of the Clingendael Institute ([email protected]). The following web link activities are prohibited by the Clingendael Institute and may present trademark and copyright infringement issues: links that involve unauthorized use of our logo, framing, inline links, or metatags, as well as hyperlinks or a form of link disguising the URL. About the authors Rena Netjes studied Arabic and Hebrew. She used to be a correspondent in Egypt and Libya. Currently, she is a research associate at Clingendael’s Conflict Research Unit where her work focuses on governance and security in northern Syria.
    [Show full text]
  • A Turkish Perspective on Syria (Ercan ÇİTLİOĞLU-Expert)
    A Turkish Perspective on Syria Ercan Çitlioğlu Acknowledgments I would like to present my thanks and gratitutes to Assoc. Prof. Dr. Umut Koldaş, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mustafa Çıraklı, Dr. Nazlı Kansu and Ayşe Okşan Okur for their assistance and contributions. Ercan Çitlioğlu 26.09.2020 This publication reflects the views of the author only Table of contents Introduction ............................................................................................. 1 The HTS .................................................................................................. 3 An Overview ........................................................................................... 10 The Impact of the “Oil Card” .................................................................. 14 The Third Perspective ............................................................................. 16 Iran .......................................................................................................... 19 Russia’s Discontent ................................................................................. 20 Saudi Arabia – UAE – Gulf States .......................................................... 22 US (Delta Crescent Energy LLC) – PYD Energy Deal .......................... 27 a) Turkish, Russian And Iranian Reactions to the Delta Crescent-PYD Deal ......................................................................................................... 29 The Russian Federation ........................................................................... 35
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Contemporary Studies
    Journal of Contemporary Studies A bi-annual publication of the Faculty of Contemporary Studies Patron-in-Chief Lieutenant General Muhammad Saeed, HI (M), President, National Defence University, Islamabad. Chairman Prof. Dr. Lubna Abid Ali, Dean, Faculty of Contemporary Studies, National Defence University, Islamabad. EDITORIAL BOARD Editor-in-Chief Prof. Dr. Zulfqar Khan Editor Prof. Dr. Shaheen Akhtar Assistant Editors Dr. Afsah Qazi Dr. Fatima Bajwa Dr. Rifaat Haque Dr. Shazia Hassan Research Associates Ms. Iffat Pervaz Ms. Hafsah Batool EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD Prof. Ian Talbot, Professor of Modern British History at the University of Southampton, UK. Prof. Dr. Sally Wallace, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, USA. Prof. Dr. Mehmet Asutay, School of Government and International Affairs, Durham University, UK. Prof. Marvin G. Weinbaum, Director for Pakistan Studies at the Middle East Institute, USA. Prof. Dr. Arshin Adib Moghaddam, Department of Politics and International Studies, School of oriental and African Studies (SOAS, University of London. Prof. Dr. S. Gulden Ayman, Marmara University Istanbul, Turkey. Dr. Andrew Futter, Associate Professor of International Politics at University of Leicester, UK. Dr. Julian Droogan, Department of Security Studies and Criminology, Macquarie University, Australia. Dr. Nishchal N. Pandey, Director Centre for South Asian Studies, Kathmandu, Nepal. Dr. Ying Rong, Senior Research Fellow, China Institute of International Studies (CIIS). Prof. Tim Edmunds, Director of Teaching and Learning, School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies (SPAIS), University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom. Prof. Dr. Hasan Askari Rizvi, Political and Defence Analyst, Pakistan. Prof. Dr. Moonis Ahmar, Dean Faculty of Arts, University of Karachi, Pakistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Henchman, Rebel, Democrat, Terrorist the YPG/‌PYD During the Syrian Conflict
    Henchman, Rebel, Democrat, Terrorist The YPG/ PYD during the Syrian conflict CRU Report Rena Netjes Erwin van Veen Henchman, Rebel, Democrat, Terrorist The YPG/ PYD during the Syrian conflict Rena Netjes Erwin van Veen CRU Report April 2021 April 2021 © Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. Cover photo: Kurdish PKK Guerilla © Flickr/Kurdishstruggle All other photos were made by Rena Netjes Unauthorized use of any materials violates copyright, trademark and / or other laws. Should a user download material from the website or any other source related to the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, or the Clingendael Institute, for personal or non-commercial use, the user must retain all copyright, trademark or other similar notices contained in the original material or on any copies of this material. Material on the website of the Clingendael Institute may be reproduced or publicly displayed, distributed or used for any public and non-commercial purposes, but only by mentioning the Clingendael Institute as its source. Permission is required to use the logo of the Clingendael Institute. This can be obtained by contacting the Communication desk of the Clingendael Institute ([email protected]). The following web link activities are prohibited by the Clingendael Institute and may present trademark and copyright infringement issues: links that involve unauthorized use of our logo, framing, inline links, or metatags, as well as hyperlinks or a form of link disguising the URL. About the authors Rena Netjes studied Arabic and Hebrew. She used to be a correspondent in Egypt and Libya. Currently, she is a research associate at Clingendael’s Conflict Research Unit where her work focuses on governance and security in northern Syria.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF | 772.82 KB | English Version
    United Nations A/HRC/43/57 General Assembly Distr.: General 28 January 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty-third session 24 February–20 March 2020 Agenda item 4 Human rights situations that require the Council’s attention Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic*, ** Summary Since the start of the conflict in the Syrian Arab Republic, hostilities show little sign of abating in several parts of the country with a large number of State and non-State actors participating across different theatres of conflict. Multiple, rapidly shifting alliances among these parties continue to create volatility and power vacuums that facilitate violations of international law. The absence of an effective peace process, coupled with the failure of conflicting parties to provide unfettered access to humanitarian actors and independent monitors, renders distant the prospect of improving the immediate protection environment for civilians. The operations by Turkish forces and the Syrian National Army, under the moniker Operation Peace Spring, followed the sudden withdrawal of troops of the United States of America in early October. The resulting rapid waves of civilians fleeing from the area between Ayn Isa and Tall Tamr contributed to an already dire displacement situation for many, including children, in areas under the control of the Syrian Democratic Forces. As battles waged over strategic areas in southern Idlib, Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham terrorists attempted to tighten their grip over the population. Activists, journalists and civilians continue to be unlawfully detained for criticizing the group’s mounting interference. Pro-government forces also carried out aerial and ground attacks in southern Idlib against terrorist organizations, striking civilian infrastructure, including protected objects such as medical facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Political, Security and Humanitarian Outcomes of Turkey's 2019 Invasion of North and East Syria
    POLITICAL, SECURITY AND HUMANITARIAN OUTCOMES OF TURKEY’S 2019 INVASION OF NORTH AND EAST SYRIA 22ND MAY 2020 SIX MONTHS ON: POLITICAL, SECURITY AND HUMANITARIAN OUTCOMES OF TURKEY’S 2019 INVASION OF NORTH AND EAST SYRIA 22ND MAY 2020 1 POLITICAL, SECURITY AND HUMANITARIAN OUTCOMES OF TURKEY’S 2019 INVASION OF NORTH AND EAST SYRIA 22ND MAY 2020 SUMMARY On 9 October 2019, Turkey attacked border cities throughout North and East Syria (NES), with the aim of occupying the areas around Sere Kaniye and Tel Abyad. This resulted in the displacement of over 200,000 civilians and the capture and oc- cupation of 5000KM 2 of land by the Turkish Armed Forces (TAF) and Turkish-con- trolled militias. This dossier examines the still-evolving situation six months after the invasion, on a political, military and humanitarian level. Some outcomes of the invasion have been immediately obvious, particularly in terms of their impact on the humanitarian situation in North and East Syria. Some major political shifts occurred in the first days of the invasion, with their shock- waves still unfolding. Others will take more time to fully emerge, as the balance of power in the region continues to shift and Russia and the USA jostle for position. 2 POLITICAL, SECURITY AND HUMANITARIAN OUTCOMES OF TURKEY’S 2019 INVASION OF NORTH AND EAST SYRIA 22ND MAY 2020 CONTENTS 1 OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 OPERATION P.4 2 CURRENT SITUATION P.6 2.1 MILITARY AND SECURITY SITUATION P.6 2.2 U.S. RUSSIA JOSTLING FOR POSITION P.9 2.3 PUBLIC ATTITUDES TO THE U.S.
    [Show full text]