Chichester Natural History Society
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
This Email Was Scanned by the Government Secure Intranet Anti-Virus Service Supplied by Vodafone in Partnership with Symantec
From: Catherine Myres To: Common Land Casework Subject: COM749 Date: 11 November 2015 18:55:44 Attachments: Final letter of mass objection including 140 names.doc 0490_001.pdf To whomever it may concern Please find attached a petition which was signed by those closest to these commons opposing the proposed fence. The letter was sent to Sussex Wildlife Trust. I note in their application they claim there is general agreement for their fencing, but this is not the case, as this letter and petition prove among those who live closest to the commons. SWT are aware of the high level of opposition but have chosen not to inform you of this. I don’t know if this invalidates their application but it is certainly unethical. Catherine Myres & Lucy Petrie Catherine Myres Old Rectory Cottage Trotton Nr Petersfield Hants GU31 5EN 01730 814170 07989 491383 This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisations IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 4th December 2013 Gemma Harding Sussex Wildlife Trust Woods Mill Henfield West Sussex BN5 9SD Dear Gemma Ref: Iping Common Proposal to permanently fence Iping & Trotton Commons As residents of these parishes and frequent users of Iping and Trotton Commons, we are writing to object to the proposed permanent perimeter fencing of these areas. We have collected over 140 signatures in opposition to the fencing. 95% live within the immediate vicinity of the common and are regular users. -
Major Development – Proposed Minerals Sites West Sussex Joint Minerals Local Plan Soft Sand Review
Major Development – proposed minerals sites West Sussex Joint Minerals Local Plan Soft Sand Review November 2019 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The purpose of this paper is to provide evidence that the national and local policies on major development in a national park have been fully considered throughout the production of the Soft Sand Review (SSR) of the West Sussex Joint Minerals Local Plan (July 2018). This is necessary in the context of the NPPF, which states in paragraph 172: Great weight should be given to conserving and enhancing landscape and scenic beauty in National Parks, the Broads and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, which have the highest status of protection in relation to these issues. The conservation and enhancement of wildlife and cultural heritage are also important considerations in these areas, and should be given great weight in National Parks and the Broads54. The scale and extent of development within these designated areas should be limited. Planning permission should be refused for major development55 other than in exceptional circumstances, and where it can be demonstrated that the development is in the public interest. Consideration of such applications should include an assessment of: a) the need for the development, including in terms of any national considerations, and the impact of permitting it, or refusing it, upon the local economy; b) the cost of, and scope for, developing outside the designated area, or meeting the need for it in some other way; and c) any detrimental effect on the environment, the landscape and recreational opportunities, and the extent to which that could be moderated. -
NOTICE of ELECTION CHICHESTER DISTRICT COUNCIL 2 MAY 2019 1 Elections Are to Be Held of Councillors for the Following Wards
NOTICE OF ELECTION CHICHESTER DISTRICT COUNCIL 2 MAY 2019 1 Elections are to be held of Councillors for the following Wards :- Ward Number of Councillors to be elected CHICHESTER CENTRAL 1 CHICHESTER EAST 2 CHICHESTER NORTH 2 CHICHESTER SOUTH 2 CHICHESTER WEST 2 EASEBOURNE (Parishes of Easebourne, Heyshott and Lodsworth) 1 FERNHURST (Parishes of Fernhurst, Lurgashall, Linch, Linchmere and Milland) 2 FITTLEWORTH (Parishes of Barlavington, Bignor, Bury, Duncton, East Lavington, 1 Fittleworth, Graffham, Stopham and Sutton) GOODWOOD (Parishes of Boxgrove, Eartham, East Dean, Singleton, Upwaltham, West Dean 1 and Westhampnett) HARBOUR VILLAGES (Parishes of Appledram, Bosham, Chidham, Donnington and 3 Fishbourne) HARTING (Parishes of Elsted & Treyford, Harting, Nyewood, Rogate and Trotton) 1 LAVANT (Parishes of Funtington and Lavant) 1 LOXWOOD (Parishes of Ebernoe, Kirdford, Loxwood, Northchapel, Plaistow & Ifold and 2 Wisborough Green) MIDHURST (Parishes of Bepton, Cocking, Midhurst, Stedham with Iping (Iping Ward), 2 Stedham with Iping (Stedham Ward), West Lavington and Woolbedding with Redford) NORTH MUNDHAM AND TANGMERE (Parishes of Hunston, Tangmere, North Mundham and 2 Oving) PETWORTH (Parishes of Petworth and Tillington) 1 SELSEY SOUTH (Parish of Selsey South Ward) 2 SIDDLESHAM WITH SELSEY NORTH (Parishes of Siddlesham and Selsey North Ward) 2 SOUTHBOURNE (Parish of Southbourne) 2 THE WITTERINGS (Parishes of Birdham, Earnley, East Wittering, Itchenor and West 3 Wittering) WESTBOURNE (Parishes of Compton, Marden, Stoughton and Westbourne) 1 2. Nomination papers may be obtained from the Elections Office at East Pallant House, Chichester, and must be delivered there on any day after the date of this notice but not later than 4PM on Wednesday, 3 APRIL 2019. -
Stedham with Iping Neighbourhood Development Plan Submission Full Representations
STEDHAM WITH IPING NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMISSION FULL REPRESENTATIONS Respondent R1 Reference: Organisation or Graham Ault Individual: Agent Details: N/A From: Graham Ault Sent: 01 January 2019 12:07 To: Neighbourhood Subject: Comments on Stedham with Iping Neighbourhood Plan As a resident of Stedham I wish to make some comments on the draft Neighbourhood Plan. I have previously made these comments to the neighbourhood Plan group but they have not been acted on, nor have I received a response to them. I broadly welcome the plan and thank the authors for their hard work in preparing it. I recognise the value of such a plan in protecting the future of the area, albeit that the status of such plans appear to have been diminished by recent government policy announcements. One of the visions of the plan (page 5), is to "promote the use of recreational spaces....." in the parish. However, one of the largest open spaces in the area is not listed in the Local Green Spaces (page 14) and indeed the whole plan appears to be silent on the issue. That area is the green space known locally as the "Polo Fields". It is a fundamentally crucial open space adjacent to the East side of Stedham village. There are two public footpaths across the land. In addition there has been a long-term understanding that local residents can access the land for responsible recreational purposes. Indeed, this happens every day of the year and is certainly not restricted to the public footpaths. The "polo Fields" title is mainly historical, dating back to the one time proposal to develop a polo centre here. -
Stedham with Iping Parish Council
STEDHAM WITH IPING PARISH COUNCIL The Openness of Local Government Bodies Regulations are in force, giving a right to members of the public to record (film, photograph and audio-record) and report on proceedings at meeting of the Council and its Committees. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summons to: J Wheelhouse, D Chalton, E Griffiths, A Hearle, E Lintott, O Mitskevich, M Perry & L Petrie From: Clerk: J Crawford NOTICE OF MEETING: No 8/3 (15-19) OF PLANNING COMMITTEE TO BE HELD: WEDNESDAY 14 MARCH 2018 at 7.15pm at STEDHAM MEMORIAL HALL AGENDA 1. DECLARATIONS OF INTERESTS 2. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 3. MINUTES OF MEETINGS: No 7/3(15-19) held on 17 JANUARY 2018 4. APPLICATIONS SDNP/18/00593/HOUS - The Old Stables Minsted - Single storey garage extension to form a studio SDNP/18/00982/TCA - Mottiston Cottage Queens Street - Notification of intention to fell 1 no. Golden Leyland Cypress tree (T1) SDNP/18/00630/HOUS - Mottiston Cottage Queens Street - Single storey extension to existing Studio; Horizontal boarding to 2no. existing Studio walls; Porch roof canopy above front door; Replacement of 3no. existing windows on Side and Rear Elevations; Addition of 1no. Conservation rooflight to existing roof; Addition of painted render over area of existing painted brickwork at rear 5. SDNPA DECISIONS SDNP/17/06508/CND - Rotherhill House, School Lane Stedham – Removal of Condition 9 of planning permission SJ/05/04133/DOM - Maintenance of driveway access. SDNPA: Approved SDNP/17/05852/FUL - 5 Bridgefoot Cottage - Retrospective use of building addressed no. 5 Bridgefoot Cottages as an independent self-contained dwelling, and use of former art studio as ancillary. -
Public Rights of Way Inspection Areas
Worth Crawley East Grinstead Rusper Ashurst Wood Turners Hill Warnham North Horsham Rudgwick Colgate West Hoathly Slinfold Linchmere Plaistow Slaugham Loxwood Broadbridge HeathHorsham Balcombe Northchapel Ardingly Linch Lurgashall Itchingfield Horsted Keynes Fernhurst Lower Beeding Milland Southwater Ebernoe Nuthurst Kirdford Ansty and Staplefield Billingshurst Rogate Wisborough Green Lindfield Cuckfield Woolbeding with Redford Lodsworth Haywards Heath Lindfield Rural Bolney Trotton with Chithurst Easebourne Shipley Tillington Cowfold Stedham with Iping Petworth Midhurst West Lavington Fittleworth Pulborough West Chiltington West Grinstead Twineham Harting Stopham Shermanbury Elsted and Treyford Burgess Hill Heyshott Bepton Thakeham Hurstpierpoint and Sayers Common East LavingtonDuncton Cocking Coldwaltham Graffham Barlavington Ashington Ashurst Albourne Henfield Hassocks Woodmancote Bury Marden Sutton Parham Wiston 1 - Katherine Eels Compton Bignor Singleton Storrington and Sullington West Dean Upwaltham East Dean Washington 2 - Katrina Harper Amberley Steyning Poynings Pyecombe Newtimber Houghton Fulking Upper Beeding Stoughton Madehurst 3 - Darryl Hobden (until 1/3/17) Slindon Burpham Bramber South Stoke Findon Lavant Boxgrove Eartham Funtington Westhampnett Patching 4 - Vacant Westbourne Coombes Arundel Warningcamp Clapham Sompting Shoreham/Southwick Tangmere Walberton Lyminster and Crossbush Southbourne 5 - Nigel Bird Chichester AldingbourneEastergate Poling Angmering Lancing Fishbourne Worthing Oving Chidham and Hambrook Ford Littlehampton -
Y5 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
Y5 bus time schedule & line map Y5 Midhurst - Trotton - Stedham - Midhurst View In Website Mode The Y5 bus line (Midhurst - Trotton - Stedham - Midhurst) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Midhurst: 11:14 AM (2) Midhurst: 9:15 AM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest Y5 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next Y5 bus arriving. Direction: Midhurst Y5 bus Time Schedule 69 stops Midhurst Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday Not Operational Grange Centre, Midhurst Tuesday Not Operational Budgens, Midhurst Wednesday Not Operational Police Station, Midhurst Thursday Not Operational White City, Midhurst Friday 11:14 AM Tesco Express, Midhurst 15 North Street, Midhurst Saturday Not Operational Bus Station, Midhurst North Street, Midhurst Convent, Midhurst Y5 bus Info Cobden Road, Midhurst Direction: Midhurst Stops: 69 Guillards Oak, Midhurst Trip Duration: 81 min Petersƒeld Road, Midhurst Line Summary: Grange Centre, Midhurst, Budgens, Midhurst, Police Station, Midhurst, Tesco Express, Elmleigh, Midhurst Midhurst, Bus Station, Midhurst, Convent, Midhurst, Guillards Oak, Midhurst, Elmleigh, Midhurst, June June Meadows, Midhurst Meadows, Midhurst, The Half Moon, Midhurst, June Meadows, Midhurst Civil Parish Heathbarn Farm, Midhurst, Woolmer Bridge, Stedham, Village, Stedham, The Hamilton, Stedham, The Half Moon, Midhurst Iping Lane, Stedham, Stedham Common, Stedham, A272, Midhurst Civil Parish Mitchell's Common, Fitzhall Heath, Bridgelands Farm, Stedham, Ingram's Green Lane, -
Consultation Statement
STEDHAM WITH IPING NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN CONSULTATION STATEMENT Stedham with Iping Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group July 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 3 Consultation Strategy ................................................................................................................. 3 EARLY ENGAGEMENT ................................................................................................. 5 Parish wide survey (July/August 2017) ....................................................................................... 5 Call for Sites (September 2017) .................................................................................................. 8 REGULATION 14 CONSULTATION ............................................................................... 9 Who were consulted? ................................................................................................................. 9 How they were consulted? ......................................................................................................... 9 The main issues and concerns raised and how these have been addressed ............................ 10 Appendix 1 – Parish Questionnaire July 2017 ........................................................... 12 Appendix 2 – Parish Questionnaire Envelope July 2017 ........................................... 20 Appendix 3 – Results of Parish Questionnaire collated September 2017 ................. 21 Appendix -
Secrets of the High Woods Research Agenda
Secrets of the High Woods Research Agenda Alice Thorne and Rebecca Bennett June 2015 Introduction and Purpose The “Secrets of the High Woods” project is a unique opportunity to investigate the “Wooded Estates”1 of West Sussex and a part of Hampshire using airborne laser scanning, field survey and archival research. Whilst generous funding from the SDNPA and HLF has made this 3-year project possible, it is clear that the impact of new data and methods used as part of the project will be far more than could possibly be achieved in the project’s lifetime or budget. This document has been produced both to help prioritise and clarify research during the project and to highlight potential for partnership work in order to more successfully understand the historic and natural environment in the area. The document has two parts, starting with an assessment of the current archaeological knowledge in the vicinity of the project area. This provides context for the second section that details a series of research themes grouped under three broad headings; Continuity and Change, People in the Landscape and the Woodland Resource. These themes by necessity interlink, but are set out separately to reflect the structure of the project and the likely interests of research partners. ALS Point cloud, Arundel Castle 1 “Wooded Estates” character area is defined in the South Downs Integrated Landscape Character Assessment as “A distinctive ridge of chalk dominated by large woodland blocks and estates in the central part of the South Downs extending from the Hampshire/West Sussex border in the west to Worthing in the east.” For full description see http://www.southdowns.gov.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/201212/LCT-B.pdf 1 The Historic Environment of the Project Area The Modern Landscape Context The landscape of the South Downs attracted much attention from archaeologists in the 19th and 20th centuries (Brandon, 1999: 44). -
Care Home Rates and Map 2021/22
Appendix 1 Indicative Rates Schedule 2021-22 CARE HOME RATES Adults’ Services Indicative Rates: Personal And Nursing Care In Registered Care Homes (All Age Groups.) Care homes registered with the care quality commission to provide personal care Table 1 Rates for Bands B, C, P and F personal care rates Description 2020-21 from 2021-22 from 6/04/20 5/04/2021 Weekly Rate Weekly Rate Band B – High level of physical care needs. Note: £423.32 £430.73 This band is only paid for people placed in a care home before 11th April 2016 Band C - Specialist dementia care £615.42 £626.19 (intensive/complex): Standard rate Band C - Specialist dementia care £700.38 £712.64 (intensive/complex): Enhanced rate Band P - Frail with intensive/complex physical £528.27 £537.51 care needs: Standard rate Band P - Frail with intensive/complex physical £655.39 £666.86 care needs: Enhanced rate Band F - Person with mental health needs. Note: £407.74 £414.88 This band is only paid for people placed in a care home before 11th April 2016. Appendix 1 Indicative Rates Schedule 2021 22 Care Homes Registered With The Care Quality Commission To Provide Nursing Care. Table 2 Band D nursing rates Description 2020-21 from 2021-22 from 6/04/20 05/04/2021 Weekly Rate Weekly Rate Band D: Nursing care. Baseline Social Care Rate £586.18 £596.44 (Accommodation and Personal Care element of Nursing Fee): Standard rate Band D: Nursing Care. Baseline Social Care Rate £644.59 £655.87 (Accommodation and Personal Care element of Nursing Fee): Enhanced rate NHS Contribution To Nursing Care – Funded Nursing Care (FNC) For Care Homes With Nursing: Note: WSCC pay fees net of FNC, with reimbursement for all FNC being paid directly from the Clinical Commissioning Group, (CCG.) This is addition to the baseline social care element. -
Sussex RARE PLANT REGISTER of Scarce & Threatened Vascular Plants, Charophytes, Bryophytes and Lichens
The Sussex RARE PLANT REGISTER of Scarce & Threatened Vascular Plants, Charophytes, Bryophytes and Lichens NB - Dummy Front Page The Sussex Rare Plant Register of Scarce & Threatened Vascular Plants, Charophytes, Bryophytes and Lichens Editor: Mary Briggs Record editors: Paul Harmes and Alan Knapp May 2001 Authors of species accounts Vascular plants: Frances Abraham (40), Mary Briggs (70), Beryl Clough (35), Pat Donovan (10), Paul Harmes (40), Arthur Hoare (10), Alan Knapp (65), David Lang (20), Trevor Lording (5), Rachel Nicholson (1), Tony Spiers (10), Nick Sturt (35), Rod Stern (25), Dennis Vinall (5) and Belinda Wheeler (1). Charophytes: (Stoneworts): Frances Abraham. Bryophytes: (Mosses and Liverworts): Rod Stern. Lichens: Simon Davey. Acknowledgements Seldom is it possible to produce a publication such as this without the input of a team of volunteers, backed by organisations sympathetic to the subject-matter, and this report is no exception. The records which form the basis for this work were made by the dedicated fieldwork of the members of the Sussex Botanical Recording Society (SBRS), The Botanical Society of the British Isles (BSBI), the British Bryological Society (BBS), The British Lichen Society (BLS) and other keen enthusiasts. This data is held by the nominated County Recorders. The Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre (SxBRC) compiled the tables of the Sussex rare Bryophytes and Lichens. It is important to note that the many contributors to the text gave their time freely and with generosity to ensure this work was completed within a tight timescale. Many of the contributions were typed by Rita Hemsley. Special thanks must go to Alan Knapp for compiling and formatting all the computerised text. -
The Jettens of Iping William Jetin Married Elizabeth Newman in 1714 at Trotton in Sussex
The Jettens of Iping William Jetin married Elizabeth Newman in 1714 at Trotton in Sussex Deeds exist showing that he, jointly with George Newman (possibly his father-in-law), both husbandmen, rented property in Trotton in 1719 and assigned away the lease in 1760 (see Appendix 1). William’s origins are yet to be identified. Daughter Elizabeth was baptised at Tuxlith (an ancient church at the north end of Trotton parish) in 1718. Sons William, John and Thomas followed (a full family tree can be found in Appendix 2). Trotton Dec 1720 Trotton Dec 1722 Trotton 1725 It is not known what happened to Thomas. John died in infancy. William married and had three daughters at Easebourne. Easebourne 1743 Easebourne Their subsequent fate is is not known (but see marriage in 1810 below). Elizabeth had three illegitimate children. Trotton 1744 Trotton 1747 Trotton 1753 The descendents of John can be found in “The Jettens of Surrey and Hampshire”. Henry Jetten and Merey/Mercy Smith of Terwick parish were married at Iping in 1775. Sons Henry, Thomas and John were baptised there in 1783, 1791 and 1794 respectively. Henry and Merey/Mercy also had daughters Jane (1778: d 1835), Elizabeth (1781), Ann (1785; d 1786), Sarah (1787; d 1787) and Martha (1788). James and Mary Jetten were baptised at Iping in 1799 (probably twins) and Lucy 1802, seemingly also attributable to Henry and Mary Jetten (although possibly ‘Mercy’). Henry Jetten (1783) and John Jetten (1794) Henry junior married Mary Budd at Trotton in 1808, his sister Jane being one of the witnesses.