Complete Volume
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Spiders (Araneae) of Stony Debris in North Bohemia
Arachnol. Mitt. 12:46-56 Basel, Dezember 1996 Spiders (Araneae) of stony debris in North Bohemia o v v Vlastimil RUZICKA & Jaromfr HAJER Abstract: The arachnofauna was studied at five stony debris sites in northern Bohemia. In Central Europe, the northern and montane species inhabiting cold places live not only on mountain tops and peat bogs but also on the lower edges of boulder debris, where air streaming through the system of inner compartments gives rise to an exceedingly cold microclimate. At such cold sites, spiders can live either on bare stones (Bathyphantes simillimus, Wubanoides ura/ensis), or in the rich layers of moss and lichen (Dip/oeentria bidentata). Kratoehviliella bieapitata exhibits a diplostenoecious occurrence in stony debris and on tree bark. Latithorax faustus and Theonoe minutissima display diplostenoecious occurrence in stony debris and on peat bogs. The occurrence of the species Seotina eelans in the Czech Republic was documented for the first time. Key words: Spiders, stony debris, microclimate, geographic distribution. INTRODUCTION Stony debris constitute, in Central Europe, island ecosystems which have remained virtually intact over the entire Holocene. Due to the unfeasibility of utilization, stony debris areas are among the few ecosystems that have only minimally been affected by man. In bulky accumulations, air can flow through the system of internal spaces. In this way, cold air can accumulate in the lower part of the tal us, so that ice can form and persist there until late spring. This phenomenon, well known from the Alp region (FURRER 1966), occurs widely in North Bohemia (KUBAT 1971). Owing to the specific substrate and microclimate, stony debris areas are inhabited by specific plant (SADLO & KOLBEK 1994) and animal communities, contributing thus o v v significantly to the biodiversity of the landscape (RUZICKA 1993a). -
Strategie Pentru Tranziția De La Cărbune În Valea Jiului Analiza Principalelor Provocări Și Oportunități Din Valea Jiului
1/5/2020 Strategie pentru tranziția de la cărbune în Valea Jiului Analiza principalelor provocări și oportunități din Valea Jiului Material tradus după documentul PwC în limba engleză, prin grija Ministerului Fondurilor Europene Prefață Proiectul „Strategie pentru tranziția de la cărbune în Valea Jiului” este finanțat de Comisia Europeană prin Programul de Sprijin pentru Reforme Structurale (DG-REFORM) și implementat în colaborare cu PricewaterhouseCoopers în baza Contractului cu numărul SRSS/SC2019/119, încheiat între PricewaterhouseCoopers EU Services EESV și Programul de Sprijin pentru Reforme Structurale (DG REFORM – Clientul) al Comisiei Europene, semnat la data de 23 octombrie 2019, având drept Beneficiar Ministerul Fondurilor Europene (MFE). Raportul de față a fost întocmit de PricewaterhouseCoopers Management Consultants SRL (în cele ce urmează „PwC”). Acesta reprezintă al treilea livrabil și a fost redactat cu scopul de a prezenta provocările și oportunitățile actuale din Valea Jiului, care acoperă dimensiunile politice și administrative, economică, sociale și culturale, tehnologice și de mediu. În identificarea și fundamentarea provocărilor și oportunităților, au fost utilizate surse publice de informații, precum și informații obținute în interviurile realizate de PwC cu părțile interesate în perioada ianuarie-februarie 2020 în Valea Jiului. Sursele de date și de informații sunt indicate atât sub grafice, scheme și tabele, cât și în notele de subsol. Informațiile utilizate au fost considerate corecte și de încredere, și nu au fost verificate separat de noi. Orice persoană care nu este destinatarul acestui raport sau care nu a semnat și returnat către PricewaterhouseCoopers Management Consultants SRL o scrisoare de acceptare a termenilor PwC privind furnizarea de informații („Release Letter”) nu este autorizată să aibă acces la acest raport. -
Uricani Monografie Turistică
Uricani Monografie turistică URICANI 2021 Cuprins 1. Considerații generale …………………………………………..…pag. 3 1.1. Prezentarea cadrului de analiză .................................................................. pag.4 Scurt istoric ............................................................................................................... pag. 9 Generalități .............................................................................................................. pag. 13 Căile de acces .......................................................................................................... pag. 15 Infrastructura edilitară .......................................................................................... pag. 17 Cadrul natural ........................................................................................................ pag. 22 Cadrul socio – economic ....................................................................................... pag. 28 Probleme de mediu și factori de risc .................................................................... pag. 34 2. Analiza potențialului turistic ………………………….………. pag. 43 2.1. Turism montan pedestru ……………………………………………….. pag. 43 2.1.1. Munții Retezat ………………………………………………......pag. 43 2.1.2. Munții Vâlcan …………………………………………………. pag. 46 2.1.3. Munții Tulișa …………………………………………..……… pag. 49 2.1.4. Munții Retezatul Mic sau Calcaros …………………………… pag. 51 2.2. Trasee turistice montane ……………………………………………….. pag. 52 2.3. Silvoterapia …………………………………………………………….. ..pag. 62 2.4. Fitoterapia locală -
Geosciences in the 21 Century______
GEOSCIENCES IN THE 21st CENTURY Symposium dedicated to the 80th anniversary of professor Emil Constantinescu EXTENDED ABSTRACTS EDITORS Antoneta Seghedi, Gheorghe Ilinca, Victor Mocanu GeoEcoMar Bucharest, 2019 Organizatori: Sponsorul volumului: GEOSCIENCES IN THE 21ST CENTURY Symposium dedicated to the 80th anniversary of Professor Emil Constantinescu EXTENDED ABSTRACTS EDITORS Antoneta Seghedi, Gheorghe Ilinca, Victor Mocanu GeoEcoMar Bucharest 2019 NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MARINE GEOLOGY AND GEOECOLOGY – GeoEcoMar – ROMANIA 23-25 Dimitrie Onciul St. 024053 Bucharest Tel./Fax: +40-021-252 30 39 Contact: [email protected] Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României Geosciences in the 21st century / editors: Antoneta Seghedi, Victor Mocanu, Gheorghe Ilinca. - Bucureşti : GeoEcoMar, 2019 Conţine bibliografie ISBN 978-606-94742-7-3 I. Seghedi, Antoneta (ed.) II. Mocanu, Victor (ed.) III. Ilinca, Gheorghe (ed.) 55 Cover: Nicoleta Aniţăi © GeoEcoMar 2019 Printed in Romania CONTENTS Foreword..................................................................................................................................................7 Nicolae Anastasiu The energy mix – the key to performance in the 21st century................................................................8 Alexandru Andrăşanu Geoconservation as a new discipline within Geosciences………………………………………………………………….10 Eliza Anton, Mihaela-Carmen Melinte-Dobrinescu Biostratigraphy of the Istria Basin (Nw Black Sea Shelf) based on calcareous nannofossils……………….14 Laurenţiu -
01003413845.Pdf
САНКТПЕТЕРБУРГСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫ Й УНИВЕРСИТЕТ На правах рукописи МАРУСИК Юрий Михайлович ПАУКИ (ARACHNIDA: ARANEI) АЗИАТСКОЙ ЧАСТИ РОССИИ: ТАКСОНОМИЯ, ФАУНА, ЗООГЕОГРАФИЯ 03.00.09 энтомологи я Автореферат диссертации на соискание ученой cTeifpJ| j доктора биологических наук ООЗОВ6Э25 СанктПетербург 2007 Работа выполнена в Лаборатории биоценологии Института биологических про блем Севера СВНЦ ДВО РАН Официальные оппоненты доктор биологических наук, профессор Эмили я Петровна Нарчук доктор биологических наук Серге й Ильич Головач доктор биологических наук Никит а Юлиевич Клюге Ведущее учреждение Пермски й государственный университет Защита состоитс я п HO^^pJL^ 200 7 г в 1 6 ч н а заседании Диссертацион ного совета Д.212 232 08 по ищите диссертаций н а соискание ученой степени доктора биологически х нау к пр и СанктПетербургско м государственно м уни верситете по адресу 199034 , СанктПетербург, Университетская наб, 7/9, ауд 133 Те л (812)328085 2 Emai l sesm@as825 8 spb edu, s_sukhareva@mail ru С диссертацией можно ознакомиться в библиотеке им А М Горьког о Санкт Петербургского государственного университета Автореферат разослан " ТО т т 200 7 года Ученый секретарь диссертационного совета, кандидат биологических наук С И Сухарев а 3 ОБЩАЯ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКА РАБОТЫ Актуальность исследовани я Пауки (Aranei) — шестой по величине отряд животных В настоящее время известно окол о 4000 0 рецентны х видо в (Platmck , 2007 ) и более тысяч и иско паемых (Wunderlich, 2004) П о оценочным данным, реально е разнообразие со ставляет, п о меньше -
Landscape-Scale Connections Between the Land Use, Habitat Quality and Ecosystem Goods and Services in the Mureş/Maros Valley
TISCIA monograph series Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureş/Maros valley Edited by László Körmöczi Szeged-Arad 2012 Two countries, one goal, joint success! Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureş/Maros valley TISCIA monograph series 1. J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds.): The Maros/Mureş River Valley. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1995. 2. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Criş/Körös Rivers’ Valleys. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1997. 3. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Someş/Szamos River Valleys. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1999. 4. J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds.): The Upper Tisa Valley. Preparatory Proposal for Ramsar Site Designation and an Ecological Background, 1999. 5. L. Gallé and L. Körmöczi (eds.): Ecology of River Valleys, 2000. 6. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): Ecological Aspects of the Tisa River Basin, 2002. 7. L. Gallé (ed.): Vegetation and Fauna of Tisza River Basin, I. 2005. 8. L. Gallé (ed.): Vegetation and Fauna of Tisza River Basin, II. 2008. 9. L. Körmöczi (ed.): Ecological and socio-economic relations in the valleys of river Körös/Criş and river Maros/Mureş, 2011. 10. L. Körmöczi (ed.): Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureş/Maros valley, 2012. -
The Study of Hidden Habitats Sheds Light on Poorly Known Taxa: Spiders of the Mesovoid Shallow Substratum
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 841: 39–59 (2019)The study of hidden habitats sheds light on poorly known taxa... 39 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.841.33271 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research The study of hidden habitats sheds light on poorly known taxa: spiders of the Mesovoid Shallow Substratum Enrique Ledesma1, Alberto Jiménez-Valverde1, Alberto de Castro2, Pablo Aguado-Aranda1, Vicente M. Ortuño1 1 Research Team on Soil Biology and Subterranean Ecosystems, Department of Life Science, Faculty of Science, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain 2 Entomology Department, Aranzadi Science Society, Donostia - San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, Spain Corresponding author: Enrique Ledesma ([email protected]); Alberto Jiménez-Valverde ([email protected]) Academic editor: P. Michalik | Received 22 January 2019 | Accepted 5 March 2019 | Published 23 April 2019 http://zoobank.org/52EA570E-CA40-453D-A921-7785A9BD188B Citation: Ledesma E, Jiménez-Valverde A, de Castro A, Aguado-Aranda P, Ortuño VM (2019) The study of hidden habitats sheds light on poorly known taxa: spiders of the Mesovoid Shallow Substratum. ZooKeys 841: 39–59. https:// doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.841.33271 Abstract The scarce and biased knowledge about the diversity and distribution of Araneae species in the Iberian Peninsula is accentuated in poorly known habitats such as the Mesovoid Shallow Substratum (MSS). The aim of this study was to characterize the spiders inventory of the colluvial MSS of the Sierra de Guadar- rama National Park, and to assess the importance of this habitat for the conservation of the taxon. Thirty-three localities were selected across the high peaks of the Guadarrama mountain range and they were sampled for a year using subterranean traps specially designed to capture arthropods in the MSS. -
196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 a Revised Checklist of the Spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection Criteria and Lists
196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 A revised checklist of the spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection criteria and lists Alastair Lavery The checklist has two main sections; List A contains all Burach, Carnbo, species proved or suspected to be established and List B Kinross, KY13 0NX species recorded only in specific circumstances. email: [email protected] The criterion for inclusion in list A is evidence that self- sustaining populations of the species are established within Great Britain and Ireland. This is taken to include records Abstract from the same site over a number of years or from a number A revised checklist of spider species found in Great Britain and of sites. Species not recorded after 1919, one hundred years Ireland is presented together with their national distributions, before the publication of this list, are not included, though national and international conservation statuses and syn- this has not been applied strictly for Irish species because of onymies. The list allows users to access the sources most often substantially lower recording levels. used in studying spiders on the archipelago. The list does not differentiate between species naturally Keywords: Araneae • Europe occurring and those that have established with human assis- tance; in practice this can be very difficult to determine. Introduction List A: species established in natural or semi-natural A checklist can have multiple purposes. Its primary pur- habitats pose is to provide an up-to-date list of the species found in the geographical area and, as in this case, to major divisions The main species list, List A1, includes all species found within that area. -
Faunistic Diversity of Spiders (Araneae) in Galichitsa Mountain (FYR Macedonia)
Biodiversity Data Journal 1: e977 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.1.e977 Taxonomic paper Faunistic diversity of spiders (Araneae) in Galichitsa mountain (FYR Macedonia) Christo Deltshev†, Marjan Komnenov‡, Gergin Blagoev§, Teodor Georgiev|, Stoyan Lazarov¶, Emilija Stojkoska‡, Maria Naumova† † Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria ‡ Macedonian Museum of Natural History, Skopje, Macedonia § Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada | Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, Bulgaria ¶ National Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria Corresponding author: Christo Deltshev ([email protected]) Academic editor: Jeremy Miller Received: 01 Aug 2013 | Accepted: 05 Sep 2013 | Published: 16 Sep 2013 Citation: Deltshev C, Komnenov M, Blagoev G, Georgiev T, Lazarov S, Stojkoska E, Naumova M (2013) Faunistic Diversity of Spiders (Araneae) in Galichitsa Mountain (FYR Macedonia). Biodiversity Data Journal 1: e977. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.1.e977 Abstract A total of 294 species from 31 families have been found in Galichitsa Mt. Of them, 85 species are new to the mountain, while 20 are also new to the fauna of FYR of Macedonia. According to their current distribution the established species can be assigned to 17 zoogeographical categories, grouped into 5 complexes (Cosmopolitan, Holarctic, European, Mediterranean, Endemics of Balkans). Dominant are Holarctic species (66.0%) followed by European (16.5%) and Mediterranean (9.3%). The endemics (6.2%) and Southeast European species (1.7%) emphasize the local character of this fauna, but its low percentage suggests an important process of colonization. Keywords Spiders, taxonomy, faunistic, zoogeography, Galichitsa Mt. © Deltshev C et al.. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. -
Catalogue of the Jumping Spiders of Northern Asia (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae)
INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMATICS AND ECOLOGY OF ANIMALS, SIBERIAN BRANCH OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Catalogue of the jumping spiders of northern Asia (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae) by D.V. Logunov & Yu.M. Marusik KMK Scientific Press Ltd. 2000 D. V. Logunov & Y. M. Marusik. Catalogue of the jumping spiders of northern Asia (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae). Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd. 2000. 299 pp. In English. Ä. Â. Ëîãóíîâ & Þ. Ì. Ìàðóñèê. Êàòàëîã ïàóêîâ-ñêàêóí÷èêîâ Ñåâåðíîé Àçèè (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae). Ìîñêâà: èçäàòåëüñòâî ÊÌÊ. 2000. 299 ñòð. Íà àíãëèéñêîì ÿçûêå. This is the first complete catalogue of the jumping spiders of northern Asia. It is based on both original data and published data dating from 1861 to October 2000. Northern Asia is defined as the territories of Siberia, the Russian Far East, Mongolia, northern provinces of China, and both Korea and Japan (Hokkaido only). The catalogue lists 216 valid species belonging to 41 genera. The following data are supplied for each species: a range character- istic, all available records from northern Asia with approximate coordinates (mapped), all misidentifications and doubtful records (not mapped), habitat preferences, references to available biological data, taxonomic notes on species where necessary, references to lists of regional fauna and to catalogues of general importance. 24 species are excluded from the list of the Northern Asian salticids. 5 species names are newly synonymized: Evarcha pseudolaetabunda Peng & Xie, 1994 with E. mongolica Danilov & Logunov, 1994; He- liophanus mongolicus Schenkel, 1953 with H. baicalensis Kulczyñski, 1895; Neon rostra- tus Seo, 1995 with N. minutus ¯abka, 1985; Salticus potanini Schenkel, 1963 with S. -
Does Parasitism Mediate Water Mite Biogeography?
Systematic & Applied Acarology 25(9): 1552–1560 (2020) ISSN 1362-1971 (print) https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.25.9.3 ISSN 2056-6069 (online) Article Does parasitism mediate water mite biogeography? HIROMI YAGUI 1 & ANTONIO G. VALDECASAS 2* 1 Centro de Ornitología y Biodiversidad (CORBIDI), Santa Rita 105, Lima 33. Peru. 2 Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), c/José Gutierrez Abascal, 2, 28006- Madrid. Spain. *Author for correspondence: Antonio G Valdecasas ([email protected]) Abstract The biogeography of organisms, particularly those with complex lifestyles that can affect dispersal ability, has been a focus of study for many decades. Most Hydrachnidia, commonly known as water mites, have a parasitic larval stage during which dispersal is predominantly host-mediated, suggesting that these water mites may have a wider distribution than non-parasitic species. However, does this actually occur? To address this question, we compiled and compared the geographic distribution of water mite species that have a parasitic larval stage with those that have lost it. We performed a bootstrap resampling analysis to compare the empirical distribution functions derived from both the complete dataset and one excluding the extreme values at each distribution tail. The results show differing distribution patterns between water mites with and without parasitic larval stages. However, contrary to expectation, they show that a wider geographic distribution is observed for a greater proportion of the species with a non-parasitic larval stage, suggesting a relevant role for non-host-mediated mechanisms of dispersal in water mites. Keywords: biogeography, water mites, non-parasitic larvae, parasitic larvae, worldwide distribution patterns Introduction Studies of the geographic distribution of organisms have greatly influenced our understanding of how species emerge and have provided arguments favoring the theory of evolution by natural selection proposed by Darwin (1859). -
Thomas Fartmann, Max Freienstein, Steffen Kämpfer, Franz Löffler & Merle Streitberger
Biodiversität von Weihnachtsbaumkulturen in Mitteleuropa: Analyse des aktuellen Zustandes und Handlungs- empfehlungen für den nachhaltigen Anbau März 2018 Thomas Fartmann, Max Freienstein, Steffen Kämpfer, Franz Löffler & Merle Streitberger Biodiversität von Weihnachtsbaumkulturen in Mitteleuropa: Analyse des aktuellen Zustandes und Handlungs- empfehlungen für den nachhaltigen Anbau (DBU-AZ 33141/01-33/0) — Endbericht — März 2018 Konventionelle Weihnachtsbaumkultur im Offenland und Indikator-Vogelarten für Weihnachtsbaumkulturen im Hochsauerland: Heidelerche (Lullula arborea), Baumpieper (Anthus trivialis), Bluthänfling (Carduelis cannabina) und Goldammer (Emberiza citrinella). (Foto: Weihnachtsbaumkultur: C. Höppner; Vogelbilder: Beaman & Madge (1998) Endbericht | DBU-Projekt: Biodiversität von Weihnachtsbaumkulturen | Universität Osnabrück Fördermittelgeber Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt (DBU) An der Bornau 2 49090 Osnabrück Fachbetreuung Dr. Reinhard Stock (Leiter Projektgruppe Gewässer/Naturschutz) Bewilligungsempfänger Abteilung für Biodiversität und Landschaftsökologie Fachbereich Biologie/Chemie Universität Osnabrück Barbarastr. 11 49076 Osnabrück Projektleitung apl. Prof. Dr. Thomas Fartmann Tel. 0541-969-3494 URL: http://fartmann.net E-Mail: [email protected] Bearbeitung Thomas Fartmann, Max Freienstein, Steffen Kämpfer, Franz Löffler & Merle Streitberger unter Mitarbeit von Jonas Brüggeshemke, Sascha Buchholz, Felix Helbing, Christian Höppner, Marvin Juchem, Marcel Kettermann, Franziska Klauer, Thorsten Münsch, Gwydion Scherer