The Naval Research Laboratory's Air-Sea Interaction Blimp Experiment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Naval Research Laboratory's Air-Sea Interaction Blimp Experiment Theodore V. Blanc,* The Naval Research Laboratory's Air-Sea William J. Plant/+4 and William C. Kellert Interaction Blimp Experiment Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 20375 Abstract been at a small number of locations under a limited variety of oceanic environments. Many of these mea- The rationale is given for a unique experiment in which microwave surements were made with restricted upwind fetch scatterometer and surface flux measurements are to be made from lengths, most were made over relatively shallow water, a blimp to develop an improved scatterometer model function. A principal goal of the effort is to obtain a more accurate understand- and only a few were made with a full appreciation ing of the relationship between the surface fluxes and the micro- of how the measurements were affected by distortions wave power backscattered from the surface of the ocean. The induced by the observation platform (Blanc 1983a, limitations of previous overwater surface flux and scatterometer 1985). For these reasons, the Naval Research Labo- measurements are reviewed. The accuracy of various flux mea- ratory (NRL) has initiated a basic research effort to surement techniques are compared. Evidence shows that if direct surface flux measurements are to be accurate to better than 20%, advance the state of flux measurement techniques over the measurements should be made at an altitude of about 5 m to the ocean. 10 m from a platform that is free of flow distortion. The improved The need for improved measurements on a global surface flux measurements are required to test proposed scattero- scale has resulted in considerable effort being ex- meter theories and to determine whether the radar backscatter is pended over the last two decades to develop various principally a function of surface stress or wind speed. It is con- cluded that scatterometer measurements accompanied by eddy- remote-sensing techniques for possible use from earth- correlation technique flux measurements must be made from a orbiting satellites (e.g., Brown et al. 1982; Bernstein platform that is highly mobile and which enables the measure- and Chilton 1985). In particular, the development of ments to be made over a variety of oceanic conditions. To meet a satellite-based technique for remotely measuring the these requirements, the Naval Research Laboratory is undertaking surface stress has received much attention because a series of air-sea interaction experiments in which a sonic ane- mometer and other flux measurement instrumentation are sus- of the limited availability of wind measurements over pended 60 m beneath a blimp flying at an altitude of 70 m while large regions of the ocean that are not frequented by multiple scatterometer measurements are made from the blimp's commercial shipping. The lack of observations in these gondola. Experiments are planned for a wide range of oceanic regions has had a severe impact on the accuracy of environments beginning off the central east coast of the United global weather and ocean wave forecasts. An active States in 1990. microwave system, called a scatterometer, presently seems to be the best candidate for the routine collec- tion of global oceanic wind measurements. A scat- 1. Introduction terometer operates by directing microwave radiation towards the surface of the ocean and measuring the The flux of momentum, heat, and humidity over the microwave power scattered back in the direction from sea must be measured to properly characterize the which it came. From space such a system could op- complex exchange process that occurs between the erate 24 hours a day in virtually any weather, except ocean and the atmosphere. Because three-quarters of heavy rain, to obtain wind information on a global the earth is covered by ocean, understanding this scale. coupled two-way interaction is essential for improv- The manner in which the ocean surface backscat- ing the forecasting of global weather and ocean wave ters microwave radiation is only partially understood conditions. The momentum flux (force per unit area) at the present time. At the relatively large 20° to 60° imparted by the wind to the ocean is commonly called incidence angles typically used in scatterometry, a the surface stress. Up to the present, only a few thou- perfectly flat surface would specularly reflect all of sand hours of high-quality overwater flux measure- the radiated power away from the direction of the ments of any kind have been made, and these have incident beam. The intensity of the radiation scat- tered back to a scatterometer is, therefore, related to the roughness of the ocean. Experiments have shown that a large portion (50% to 80%) of the backscatter * Atmospheric Physics Branch (Code 4110) is the result of Bragg scattering, a resonant-type in- t Space Sensing Branch (Code 8310) t New Address: Ocean Engineering Department, Woods Hole teraction between centimeter-long microwave radia- Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543 tion and the wind-induced, centimeter-size, gravity 354 Vol. 70, No. 4, April 1989 Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/10/21 09:04 PM UTC Bulletin American Meteorological Society 355 capillary waves that are propagating in the direction of the radiation on the sea surface (Plant 1986). Al- though other less understood types of scattering such as wedge effects, spray, and bubbles (Lyzenga et al. 1983; Phillips 1988) undoubtedly contribute to the total backscattered signal, assessment of their impor- tance is complicated by the fact that they, like Bragg scattering, vary with wind intensity and incidence an- gle of the radiation. A topic of keen interest within the scatterometry research community is whether the intensity of the backscattered power is more directly the result of surface stress or wind speed. Although the surface stress is largely (about 65%) a function of the average wind speed, it is also influenced by other variables, such as the preexisting sea state. Different amounts of stress, therefore, can be imparted to the ocean at the same wind speed. Given an accurate direct surface stress measurement, which requires making fast-response measurements of all three com- ponents of the wind vector, it is possible to determine an accurate average wind speed. The converse, how- FIG. 1. The relative microwave backscattered power as a func- tion of bulk-determined surface stress for unstable and near-neutral ever, is not true. stability conditions over the Gulf of Mexico. Accurate surface flux measurements are critical to the validation of most scatterometer theories. Such problems involved in developing a more accurate measurements are difficult to obtain over the ocean. model function. The figure shows approximately 240 Very few scatterometer measurements have been made 21.3-min averaged X-band (3.2 cm, 9.4 GHz) micro- simultaneously with direct, high-quality measure- wave backscatter observations and coincident sur- ments of the surface stress. Much of the existing data face determinations made over the Gulf of Mexico base consists of scatterometer results calibrated with (Keller et al. 1985). The measurements were made indirect measurements of the surface stress obtained during a two-week period in the late fall from a tower with the bulk method (e.g., Liu and Large 1981). The located in 32-m-deep water. The antenna system for bulk method is a technique that estimates the fluxes the vertically polarized measurements was pointed from rudimentary measurements of average wind down at an angle of 45° and rotated to face approx- speed, air temperature, humidity, and water temper- imately into the wind. Data in which the antenna's ature. The bulk estimate of the surface stress is based misalignment with the wind was greater than 40° were on the general observation that the stress tends to rejected, and the remaining misalignment influence increase in rough proportionality to the square of the on the measured backscattered signal was corrected average wind speed. Blanc (1987) used a best-case using the model function of Wentz et al. (1984). The scenario to show that, over the range of surface stress meteorological observations were averaged over a 5- magnitudes encountered during these calibration ex- min period at the start of the clock hour and were periments, the uncertainty of the individual bulk-de- made at an altitude of 24.7 m from the same tower rived stress estimates typically ranged from 35% to as the scatterometer measurements. From this infor- well in excess of 100% of their true value. An over- mation, the values for the "standard" meteorological view and history of scatterometry is given by Moore altitude of 10 m were computed. The wind speed at and Fung (1979); Taylor (1985) summarizes many of 10 m ranged from 1 m • s~1 to 13 m • s~\ and the the problems inherent in previous surface stress de- air-water temperature difference at 10 m varied from terminations used to calibrate scatterometer measure- -16°C to +2°C. The surface stress, or downward ments. It is not surprising then, that the relationship momentum flux, and the stability were computed by between the scatterometer output and surface stress using the Large and Pond (1981, 1982) bulk flux is less exact than desired. A principal goal of the scheme. Stress values for which the Monin-Obukhov Naval Research Laboratory effort is to remedy this stability at 10 m (Blanc 1985) were less than -0.16 situation. are labeled as unstable. Most observations were made A scatterometer model function algorithm is re- under near-neutral stability; none were made under quired to translate the scatterometer output into the highly stable conditions. Assuming that the meteoro- desired surface stress or wind speed observation. The logical observations are no worse than those taken data in figure 1 are presented to illustrate some of the from weatherships, Blanc (1987) estimated the sur- Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/10/21 09:04 PM UTC 356 Vol.
Recommended publications
  • Lighter-Than-Air Vehicles for Civilian and Military Applications
    Lighter-than-Air Vehicles for Civilian and Military Applications From the world leaders in the manufacture of aerostats, airships, air cell structures, gas balloons & tethered balloons Aerostats Parachute Training Balloons Airships Nose Docking and PARACHUTE TRAINING BALLOONS Mooring Mast System The airborne Parachute Training Balloon system (PTB) is used to give preliminary training in static line parachute jumping. For this purpose, an Instructor and a number of trainees are carried to the operational height in a balloon car, the winch is stopped, and when certain conditions are satisfied, the trainees are dispatched and make their parachute descent from the balloon car. GA-22 Airship Fully Autonomous AIRSHIPS An airship or dirigible is a type of aerostat or “lighter-than-air aircraft” that can be steered and propelled through the air using rudders and propellers or other thrust mechanisms. Unlike aerodynamic aircraft such as fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters, which produce lift by moving a wing through the air, aerostatic aircraft, and unlike hot air balloons, stay aloft by filling a large cavity with a AEROSTATS lifting gas. The main types of airship are non rigid (blimps), semi-rigid and rigid. Non rigid Aerostats are a cost effective and efficient way to raise a payload to a required altitude. airships use a pressure level in excess of the surrounding air pressure to retain Also known as a blimp or kite aerostat, aerostats have been in use since the early 19th century their shape during flight. Unlike the rigid design, the non-rigid airship’s gas for a variety of observation purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Goodyear – Civilian Blimps
    Goodyear – civilian blimps Peter Lobner, 24 August 2021 1. Introduction Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company began their involvement with lighter-than-air (LTA) vehicles in 1912, when the company developed a fabric envelope suitable for use in airships and aerostats. The first blimps manufactured by the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company were B-Type blimps ordered by the US Navy in 1917 for convoy escort duty. Goodyear (envelope supplier) and Curtiss Aeroplane (gondola supplier) produced 9 of the 17 B-Type blimps ordered. Goodyear also supplied the envelopes for some of the Navy’s 10 C-Type patrol blimps, which were delivered in 1918, after the end of WW I. Both the B- and C-Type blimps used hydrogen as the lift gas. In 1923, Goodyear teamed with German firm Luftschiffbau Zeppelin and created a new subsidiary, Goodyear Zeppelin Corporation. In June 1925, their Type AD Pilgrim (NC-9A) made its first flight and became Goodyear’s first blimp to use helium lift gas. Pilgrim was certified later in 1925, becoming the first US commercial airship. Goodyear Zeppelin Corporation filed a patent application for a nonrigid airship in September 1929, describing the objectives of their invention as follows: “This invention relates to non-rigid airships, and it has particular relation to the suspension of pilot cars or gondolas from the envelopes of non-rigid airships. The principal object of the invention is to provide a non-rigid airship in which the envelope and the pilot car or engine car are so constructed as to offer the minimum air resistance. Another object of the invention is to provide connections between the envelope and pilot car that are not exposed to the airstream for sustaining the weight of the pilot car, as well as stabilizing it against lateral or longitudinal movement.” 1 In patent Figure 1, the pressurized lift gas envelope (10) contains an air ballonet (12, for adjusting airship buoyancy) and a load suspension system for carrying and distributing the weight of the gondola (11) affixed under the envelope and the thrust loads from the with attached engines.
    [Show full text]
  • Manufacturing Techniques of a Hybrid Airship Prototype
    UNIVERSIDADE DA BEIRA INTERIOR Engenharia Manufacturing Techniques of a Hybrid Airship Prototype Sara Emília Cruz Claro Dissertação para obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Engenharia Aeronáutica (Ciclo de estudos integrado) Orientador: Prof. Doutor Jorge Miguel Reis Silva, PhD Co-orientador: Prof. Doutor Pedro Vieira Gamboa, PhD Covilhã, outubro de 2015 ii AVISO A presente dissertação foi realizada no âmbito de um projeto de investigação desenvolvido em colaboração entre o Instituto Superior Técnico e a Universidade da Beira Interior e designado genericamente por URBLOG - Dirigível para Logística Urbana. Este projeto produziu novos conceitos aplicáveis a dirigíveis, os quais foram submetidos a processo de proteção de invenção através de um pedido de registo de patente. A equipa de inventores é constituída pelos seguintes elementos: Rosário Macário, Instituto Superior Técnico; Vasco Reis, Instituto Superior Técnico; Jorge Silva, Universidade da Beira Interior; Pedro Gamboa, Universidade da Beira Interior; João Neves, Universidade da Beira Interior. As partes da presente dissertação relevantes para efeitos do processo de proteção de invenção estão devidamente assinaladas através de chamadas de pé de página. As demais partes são da autoria do candidato, as quais foram discutidas e trabalhadas com os orientadores e o grupo de investigadores e inventores supracitados. Assim, o candidato não poderá posteriormente reclamar individualmente a autoria de qualquer das partes. Covilhã e UBI, 1 de Outubro de 2015 _______________________________ (Sara Emília Cruz Claro) iii iv Dedicator I want to dedicate this work to my family who always supported me. To my parents, for all the love, patience and strength that gave me during these five years. To my brother who never stopped believing in me, and has always been my support and my mentor.
    [Show full text]
  • Luiz Otávio Furtado Ferreira Experimental Investigations of Stability and Aerodynamic Interference Effects of an X-Tail Convent
    University of São Paulo São Carlos School of Engineering Mechanical Engineering Department Mechanical Engineering Graduate Program – Aircraft Luiz Otávio Furtado Ferreira Experimental investigations of stability and aerodynamic interference effects of an x-tail conventional airship São Carlos 2018 Universidade de São Paulo Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Mecânica – Aeronaves Luiz Otávio Furtado Ferreira Investigações experimentais de estabilidade e efeitos de interferência aerodinâmica de um dirigível convencional com cauda em x Versão Corrigida (Versão original encontra-se na unidade que aloja o Programa de Pós-Graduação) Dissertação apresentada à Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, como requisito parcial para a obtenção do título de Mestre em Engenharia Mecânica. Área de Concentração: Aeronaves Orientador: Prof. Tit. Fernando Martini Catalano São Carlos 2018 I AUTHORIZE TOTAL OR PARTIAL REPRODUCTION OF THIS WORK BY ANY CONVENTIONAL OR ELECTRONIC MEANS, FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES, SO LONG AS THE SOURCE IS CITED. Ferreira, Luiz Otávio Furtado F383e Experimental investigations of stability and Aerodynamic interference effects of an x-tail conventional airship / Luiz Otávio Furtado Ferreira; advisor Fernando Martini Catalano. São Carlos, 2018. Master (Thesis) - Graduate Program in Mechanical Engineering and Subject area in Aircraft -- São Carlos School of Engineering, at University of São Paulo, 2018. Corrected version. 1. Airship. 2. Aerodynamic
    [Show full text]
  • Autonomous Blimp Major Qualifying Project Report
    Project ID: FJL-BLMP Project ID: GTH-AAA6 Towards the Realization of an Autonomous Blimp Major Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the Faculty Of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Electrical and Computer Engineering and Computer Science by Jeremy Colon (CS) Melinda Race (ECE) Darius Toussi (ECE) Richard Walker (ECE) Date Submitted: April 25, 2013 Project Advisors: George Heineman Fred Looft 0 Abstract This project continues an MQP from the 2011-12 academic year: Development of an Autonomous Blimp. The objective of our project was to modify the existing design by implementing autonomous flight capability using an Android phone, a power system capable of tracking energy usage, and a camera mission module for aerial photography. Through testing and flight tests, we demonstrated that we successfully implemented non-optimized autonomous flight, portions of the power system design, and a camera mission module. i Acknowledgements We would like to thank our advisors Professor George Heineman and Professor Fred Looft for their continued support throughout this project. We would also like to thank the following individuals for their help with this project: Thomas Angelotti Danielle Beaulieu Torbjorn Bergstrom Professor Stephen Bitar Adam Blumenau Nicholas DeMarinis Cathy Emmerton Richard Gammon Mitchell Monserrate Patrick Morrison Earl Ziegler ii Table of Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kite Launch Using an Aerostat
    Kite launch using an aerostat Ir. J. Breukels Delft University of Technology Faculty of Aerospace Engineering The Netherlands ________________________________________________________________________ 1 Kite launch using an aerostat Ir. J. Breukels ASSET Chair Faculty of Aerospace Engineering Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands Kluyverweg 1 2629HS Delft The Netherlands Tel: 0152585571 [email protected] Delft, August 21st 2007 ________________________________________________________________________ 2 Table of contents Table of contents 3 Nomenclature 1. Introduction 5 2. Requirements 6 2.1 Operational requirements 6 2.2 Docking and release requirements 6 2.3 Ground handling requirements 6 2.4 Safety requirements 6 2.5 Meteorological requirements 7 3. The aerostat 7 3.1 Operating the aerostat 9 3.2 Aerostatics 9 3.3 Aerodynamics 10 4. The kite release system 13 4.1 Chin docking 13 4.2 Piggy-back docking 14 5. Kite and aerostat combined 16 6. Observations during testing 16 6.1 July 25th 2007 16 6.2 July 26th 2007 17 6.3 August 14th 2007 17 6.4 August 17th 2007 17 7. Conclusions and recommendations 18 References 19 ________________________________________________________________________ 3 Nomenclature B - The upward buoyancy force acting on a body Cd - Drag coefficient Cf - Friction coefficient d - Diameter of the aerostat Df - Friction drag Dp - Preddure drag Ld - Disposable or net lift Lg - Gross or total buoyancy lift of the enclosed gas Re - Reynolds number Swetted - Wetted surface of the body V - Volume W - Total weight of the system W0 - The weight of the envelope ρa - Air density of the local atmosphere ρg - Air density of the internal gas volume ________________________________________________________________________ 4 1.
    [Show full text]
  • To What Extent Does Modern Technology Address the Problems of Past
    To what extent does modern technology address the problems of past airships? Ansel Sterling Barnes Today, we have numerous technologies we take for granted: electricity, easy internet access, wireless communications, vast networks of highways crossing the continents, and flights crisscrossing the globe. Flight, though, is special because it captures man’s imagination. Humankind has dreamed of flight since Paleolithic times, and has achieved it with heavier-than-air craft such as airplanes and helicopters. Both of these are very useful and have many applications, but for certain jobs, these aircraft are not the ideal option because they are loud and waste energy. Luckily, there is an alternative to energy hogs like airplanes or helicopters, a lighter-than-air craft that predates both: airships! Airships do not generate their own lift through sheer power like heavier-than-air craft. They are airborne submarines of a sort that use a different lift source: gas. They don’t need to use the force of moving air to lift them from the ground, so they require very little energy to lift off or to fly. Unfortunately, there were problems with past airships; problems that were the reason for the decline of airships after World War II: cost, pilot skill, vulnerability to weather, complex systems control, materials, size, power source, and lifting gas. This begs the question: To what extent does modern technology address the problems of past airships? With today’s technology, said problems can be managed. Most people know lighter-than-air craft by one name or another: hot air balloons, blimps, dirigibles, zeppelins, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of an Autonomous Blimp
    Development of an Autonomous Blimp A Major Qualifying Project submitted to the faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science April 26, 2011 Submitted by: Daniel Lanier (ME/RBE) Daniel Sarafconn (RBE) Marcus Menghini (RBE) Advised by: Professor Fred Looft Professor Stephen Nestigner Advisor Code: FJL Project Code: BLMP Abstract The purpose of this project was to design and fabricate an autonomous dirigible-based platform that could be used to enable development of navigational controllers and provide multi-mission capability through modularity. The platform was designed to carry and interface with a variety of mission specific hardware through a standard interface. A customized hardware platform was designed including a propulsion system and integrated sensor suite. Multiple ground level tests were undertaken to determine sensor performance and the capabilities of the navigational programs. Acknowledgements The team would like to thank our advisors, Professors Looft and Nestinger, for their continued support throughout this project. The team would also like to thank the following individuals for their help with the project: Richard Gammon Amy Morton Torbjorn Bergstrom Adam Sears Joe St. Germain Professor John Hall Don Pellegrino Tracy Coetzee ii Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Airship Aerodynamics Technical Manual
    *TM 1-320 TECHNICAL MANUAL } WAR DEPARTMENT, No. 1-820 W ASHlNGTON, Pebr·um·y 11, 1941. AIRSHIP AERODYNAMICS Prepared under direction of Chief of the Air Corps SroriON I. General. Paragraph Definition of aerodynamics__________________ 1 Purpose and scope________ _____ __ __ ____ __ __ _ 2 Importance ---- ---------------------------- 3 Glossary of terms____ _____ ___ __________ __ __ 4 Types of airships----------- ---------------- 5 Aerodynamic forces_______________ __________ 6 ll. Resistance. Fluid resi&ance___________ ________ _________ 7 Shape coefficients_______ ____________________ 8 Coefficient of skin friction___________________ 9 Resistance of streamlined body-------------- 10 Prismatic coefficient------------------------ 11 Index of form efficiency_______ _____________ 12 lllustrative resistance problem_______________ 13 Scale effect--------------------------- - ---- 14 Resistance of completely rigged airship______ 15 Deceleration test --------- ------ ------------ 16 III. P ower requirements. Power required to overcome airship resistance_ 17 Results of various speed t rials____ ___ ________ 18 Burgess formula for horsepower------------- 19 Speed developed by given horsepower________ 20 Summary-----------------------""'---------- - 21 IV. Stability. Variation of pressure distribution on airship hull------------------------------------- 22 Specific stability and center of gravity of air- shiP---------------------------------- --- 23 Center of buoyancy________________________ 24 Description of major axis of airship__________ 25
    [Show full text]
  • Design a Jet-Powered Blimp (Jpb)
    2015 STATE MATH AND SCIENCE COMPETITION: ENGINEERING DESIGN CHALLENGE DESIGN A JET-POWERED BLIMP (JPB) Every year, engineers build an ice-runway to provide supplies to researchers at the McMurdo Research Station in Antarctica. A sudden shift in ice floes has blocked runway access and there is a race to identify an alternate runway location. Your team has been invited to present your design for a jet-powered blimp (JPB) that can survey the icy landscape quickly and efficiently. Project Overview: You have 45 minutes to design a JPB prototype that can fly in a straight line, maintain altitude and cover long distances. You will also present the design concept and explain the propulsion system to the judges. Teams will earn points for performance (how far the JPB flies), design (the propulsion & flotation systems used), creativity, team-work and presentation skills. Awards: Five teams will win awards for performance and three teams will be recognized for team work, design and creativity. One team will receive the ‘Collier Inspired Innovation Award’ for outstanding performance and creativity. Definitions: A blimp is a non-rigid airship that relies on buoyant gases for lift and has a means of propulsion. In other words, a blimp floats using buoyant gases (like helium-filled balloons) has a way to move forward (using a motor or other propulsion system) is flexible (more like the top of a convertible car and less like the body of the car) Jet propulsion is thrust produced by passing a jet of matter (typically air or water) in the opposite direction to the direction of motion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Airships
    BY: Arjumand-Bano The Airships By Arjumand Bano (13005001010) Research Supervisor: Sir Kalim- Ur- Rehman A Research Project Submitted to Aviation Management In Partial fulfillment of requirement of Degree of Aviation Management Department of Institute of Aviation Studies University of Management and Technology Johar Town, Lahore May, 2017 Preface his project “The Airships” is done as a part of BS Aviation Management which has to be done in last semester in University of Management and T Technology, Lahore. I am glad to dedicate this project to Sir Kalim- Ur- Rehman which is project supervisor and without their guidance this project cannot be done competently. I am thankful to my parents and teachers who guided me in this project. For preparing the project I studied different websites related to airships. The data related to airships is easily available on internet. The research is based on airships types, its history, construction, biographies, modern airships etc. I tried my level best to put maximum information related to airships and keep the project from inaccuracies. If this project can help anyone to increase his/her information and knowledge I will feel that the purpose of my hard work has been achieved. ------------------------- Arjumand-Bano ID: 13005001010 Batch#5 Email: [email protected] BS Aviation Management (2013-2017) University of Management and Technology, Lahore. Acknowledgement t is genuine pleasure to express my deep sense of thanks and gratitude to supervisor Sir Kalim- Ur -Rehman. Their keen interest and dedication above I all their overwhelming attitude to help their students had been solely and largely responsible for completing my work.
    [Show full text]
  • T.L. Blakemore Collection Lighter-Than-Air Box 1 1 Correspondence 1919-1929 2 Index: LTA Craft Photographs Vol. 1 & 2 N.D. 3
    T.L. Blakemore Collection Lighter-Than-Air Box 1 1 Correspondence 1919-1929 2 Index: LTA Craft photographs Vol. 1 & 2 n.d. 3 "A" type airship n.d. 4 "AC" type airship 1922 5 "C" type airships n.d. 6 Santos Dumont - non rigid 1910 7 Car for "F" type airship (Navy) 1918 8 Goodyear Commercial motor balloon n.d. 9 "J" type airship n.d. 10 "J" type airship: Instrument board 1922 11 "J" type airship: Instrument Board n.d. 12 Photographs: J-6 engine outrigger for J-4 non-rigid 1933 13 Kite balloon: (Observation) 1920 14 Photographs Goodyear Pilgrim airship 1925 15 Photographs Roma Airship n.d. 16 Photographs RS-1 airship n.d. 17 Photographs "TC" type airship 1924 18 Photographs "TC" Instrument panels n.d. 19 Photographs "TC-11"control car n.d. 20 Photographs "TC-11" 1929 21 Photographs "TC" water model, AC Car n.d. 22 Photographs "TC" water model, TC car n.d. 23 Photographs "TC" or Los Angeles 1927 24 Photographs "TE" type airship n.d. 25 Photographs U.S. Army airship 1927 26 Photographs Zodiac 1920 27 Photograph Unidentified airship n.d. 28 Photograph Unidentified airship n.d. 29 Photograph Unidentified airship n.d. 30 Photograph Unidentified airship n.d. 31 Photograph U.S.S. Los Angeles n.d. 32 Photograph Airship car and motor n.d. 33 Photograph Airship car 1924 34 Photograph Engine car n.d. 35 Photograph Parts 1921 36 Photograph Left engine air starter 1926 37 Photograph Fabric n.d. 38 Photograph Components: Gas cell, Aero marine n.d plane & motor (docking device) 39 Photograph Mobile yaw guy winch 1933 40 Photograph Docking rail with trolley, mooring system n.d.
    [Show full text]