Maneuver Center of Excellence (Mcoe) Libraries Mcoe HQ Donovan Research Library Fort Benning, Georgia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Maneuver Center of Excellence (Mcoe) Libraries Mcoe HQ Donovan Research Library Fort Benning, Georgia Maneuver Center of Excellence (MCoE) Libraries MCoE HQ Donovan Research Library Fort Benning, Georgia Report date: 25 October 1944 Title: Report of Airborne Operations in Dragoon Author: Allied Force Headquarters Abstract: This report of Airborne Operations in Dragoon which occurred on 15 August 1944 was an Allied invasion of southern France. The report includes an introduction, organization, planning, training, the operation, ground activities, statistics and a summary. Number of pages: 18 p. Notes: From the MCoE HQ Donovan Research Library, Fort Benning, GA. Documents collection. Call #: D767.66_A201 Classification: Unclassified; Approved for public release D 767.66 Report of Abn Opns in Dragoon i'!. dlJ .A.o1. , ---0 .1 -- -- -- - .... , .. A •. :V ...................................... ZY. ,. , :.' ".I --,? -... •... The following image(s) may be of poor quality due to the poor quality .of the original. inu.wuD FORCE HEADQUARTERS . APO 512 :Auth "-SACMTT 77<o ;Initials: - :. AQ 370. 2/171 GCT-0- 30 Oct obet- 1-944 OJLBJECT: Report on Airborne Operations in DRAGOON. TO : All Concerned -Y Attached -~X V fPor your information is copy of.-Repot.:.onAiborne Operations in DRAGOON, dated ?5 October 1944. By command of General-WIl ON: I Ia-cl R. H, FR. .E Capt ain, .AC-D Report- on Airborne Operations Asst Adjutant General in DRAGOON, dtd 25 October 44 •DISTRIBUTION: ,(vwith nci) 2 War. Of f ice.,..London 2 War Dept (l-On-D) (1-4SF) OG AGF, WD. " *2 7 /- . US.LW (::a.h). 1st 50)9. 7SQ5,5t Airborne Army -: China Theater ::;: 'i 1'94 6 cj0 'b -Yo 1. Burma- India Theater ,2" 12th TaCtical Force 6th rmy Group ., 2 seventh. Amy .9 First Airborne Task. Force 4irborne Training Center ' 2 Fifth imy. 334th 'AI Depot Co (4/B) • ' I - Signals FId Arty *1 G-3 (Major Mulctahy) 1 - Surgeon (;) I G-4 2- AG Reccrds w/1 Engr cy. of incl - : 1-- AG M.& D in.s lilI. REPORT ON AIRBO]iHL OPTATIi1Sw 4 DRAWGOON 25 October 1944 IN~lil I Introduction ....................... i IT OrganizationM ... ....... ' .. IIIV.. Planning ............. ,Training.. .VI .6 0 0 " a, . The Operationui ie C- C 0 .. o..............VI Ground Activitis VII Statistics ................................. Summary .. .SI.. I - IhTRODUCTION in DRAGOON was 1. Initial preliminary planning for the airborne operation 1944. The status of by the planning staff of Seventh Army in February begun Thfluenced pldnning at airborne units in the theater at that time matet'ially airborne or trdop carrier, were this stage. At this period none of the units, The 51st Troop Carrier Wing, com- actually prepared for airborne operations. the theater after the inactivation of posed of three groups, had remained in this Wing was avail- However, only a portion of th. XII Troop Carrier Command. for troop carrier aircraft for able for airborne training, because of the demands transport requirements. A few operations, air evacuation, and general to the Airborne Training specialaircraft of this GJroup ere attched intermittently was feasible. At tShe Center where a limited program of airborne training and the American theCenter First French Parachute Regiment, two pathfinder platoons placements received limited airborne training. The British 2nd Independent Army. The0Q th, ws in the line as infantty with ,the Eighth parachute Brigade Parachute Field and Batteries UAU and "B" of the 463d rachute Battalion, Army. By May, however ttalion were similarly in the line with Fifth Art'fIMffWB These parachute units were withr- situation had been improved considerably. this with a full troop carrier group from the line and given intensive training forvard of the madedrawn availablein the Salerno area follou.ing the displacement 51st Troop Carrier Wing from its former base in Sicily to Italy. Subsequently< 2nd" for the use of the 509th Battalion and the British several plans formulated Armies which would have in the dperations of Fifth and iighth Parachute Brigade materialize and airborne planning for DRAGOON, did not materially affected consequently obviated. The War Departmentproblems which was wouldrequestud have toarisen provide therefrom an airborne were division for employment in were shipped to the but in lieu of this, a number of separate units DRGON 550th Glider These were ° 1st Battalion, 551st Parachute Regiment; theater. Combat Team. The two former Infantry Battalion; and 517th Parochute Regimental Center, then located in Sicily, for units were attached to the Airborne Training attached to Fifth Ari"~ The 517th Parachute Regimo'ntal Combat Team was training. ,. for ten days of' battle experience in the line. in June there were considerable airborne forces 2., Thus; by7 the middle of To secure the .the theater which could be considered Laliable for operations u.. i,+t was decided to move the . - ., _ . .. t,1 _._ ...... o n utmost cohcsi accnd t~o oibc-aln cop .... , .... as the troop carrier with its attched units, as well Training Centr _. Airborne... .. ,.. ,_ IncP# I .".n ." DRAGOON aircraft now increascd to-to full groups of the 51st Troop Carrier ing, to the Rome area. Here was established a compact forwiard base for all our airborne forces. II - ORGANIZATION, i. Airborne Elements a. Toward the first Qf. July the plans for Operation DPAGOON were made. firm, including the-use of a provisional airborne division made up of the avail- able units in the theater. Major General Robert T. Frederick, formerly commander of the Fir*t Special Service Force and later commander of the 36th Infantry Division, assumed command of the composite force. Conferences were held immed- iately to secure the additidnal supporting units needed to organize such a bal- anced airborne force. Certain units on the DRAGOON trdop list vere earffiarked for this purpose. Authority was requested from the War Department to dctivate thbse units which were not ,authorized on the theater troop list. By 7 July, initial. instructions relative to the organization Of the Provisional .Airborne Division were issued to Gener.l §7r-derick. b. Troops to e made available were -then as follows: - (1) Headquarters and Headquarters Company, Provisional Airborne Di-Tr*. s i o, (2) Beta2 tmc?ft of the Third Ordnance Mcdium Maintenanbe Cqmpany. (3) 5 rjn; .. hfinder Platoons. (Unauthori~ed, formed from Force po-.sonnel). (4) British 2nd Parachute Brigade Group (5) 51.Thh Parachute Regimental Combat Team (6) 509th Para'chute Battalion (7) 1st Battalion, 551st Parachute Infantry (e-) 550th Glider Infantry Battalion (9) 463d Parachute Field Artillery Battalion (1o) 602d Pack Field Artillery Battaliono .. - (11) Antitank Company, 442d Infantry (Japanese-American) (12) 887th Airborne Aviation Engineer Company (13) Company "A", 2d Chemical Battalion (motorized) S (14) Company "B", S3d Chemical' Bqttrilion (motorized) (15) 512th Airborne Signal Company -(16) 676th Medical Collecting Company. (Designated 29 July 1944). ., c. The Division was then given n five per Qent ,overstrength in personnel by the assignment of parachute filler replacements from the Airborne Training Center, M.eanwhile, the activation of the divisional headquarters and headquarters company, two additional batteries of the 463d Field Artillery Battalion, the 512th Airborne Signal Company and the 552d Antitank Comp ny all proceeded apace. Because of the short time remaining before B-Day, it was decided not to attempt to prepare the 552d Antitank Company for the operation, since the antitank company of the 442d Infantry was available. It should be noted here, however, that it was necqssary to re-equip the latter antitank unit (from the Js~panese- .4_ American Rcgiment) with the British Airborne six-pounder, since our own 57mm , . antitank gun will not fit' into the <zoco glider. "" o * .M aions, DRAGOON d. Because of the shortage of qualified airborne officers in this theater, it was necessary to ask the WI!ar Department to make available a division- al'staff for General Frederick. Thiirt y-six qualified staff officers. called for by T/O 71-2 arrived in the theater by air toward the middle of July. Most of these ojfficers came from the 13th 'Lirbornc Divisionand a few fromthe Airborne Center, Camp heckall, North Carolina. Certain other organizations were made available to Genetel Frederick on the basis of their being employed in the preparatory.stage but not in the operation itself. These units included detachments from a signal operations company, a quartermaster truck-company and some four hundred replacements from the Airborne Trairng CenLer. 2. 1roor Carrier Elements a. ns of the middle of July there mere available in the theater for airborne operations, two groups of the 51st Troop Carrier W7ing. The third group was occup ilith"Tsufficient special operations, 7o provide lift for DRAGOON, additional troop carrier groups vwere called for'by Allied Force Headquarters. The total minimm of aircra..ft required for the operation was 450. On 10 July 1944 orders wo(ere issued placing the 50th and 53d Troop Carrier Wings of the IV Troop Carrier Command (then located in United Kingdom) on temporary duty with the theater. Each Wing contained four groups of three squadrons each, rein- forced by self-sustaining admiistrative and maintenance echelons and by the IX Troop Carrier Command Pthfinder Uni, a total of 413 aircraft. In additon to the personnel and equipment moved in organic aircrb0ft, tha Air TransPort Command augmented the movenent by transporting the 819th M1edical ir 'Evacuation Squadron, various signal detachments; assorted parapack equipment and 375 org- anic glider pilots. The movo, made in-eight echelons via GIBRALTAR and MARRAKECH. required but t-io ' days. T-,o aircraft w.lerc lost en route. Brigadier General Paul . iliiams in command.1: i0.S oof Y1co.11E-ndtvot o-wings from the United1 Kingd,ng dom, arrivedarvdo on,16 JuLyJl 1944 and activated the Provisional Troop Carrier Air Division. By 20 July, the entire.Provisional Troop Carrier Jir Division had arrived in the theater and was stationed ct its designated airfiLcds, prepared to carry out its missions.
Recommended publications
  • Download Print Version (PDF)
    IA Giant n T Enters h e at the Battle: e r Order of Battle of the UN and Chinese Communist Forces in Korea, November 1950 by Troy J. Sacquety fter Inch’on and the Eighth U.S. Army (EUSA) abreakout from the Pusan Perimeter, the North Korean People’s Army (NKPA) reeled back in shambles, their supply lines cut. On paper, the NKPA had a total of eight corps, thirty divisions, and several brigades, but in reality most were combat ineffective.1 Many North Korean units had fled north of the Yalu into Manchuria in order to refit and replenish their numbers. Only the IV Corps with one division and two brigades opposed the South Korean I Corps in northeastern Korea, and four cut-off divisions of II Corps and stragglers resorted to guerrilla operations near the 38th Parallel. South Korea provided soldiers, called “KATUSAs” to serve in U.S. With the war appearing won, only the Chinese and divisions alongside American soldiers. This soldier, nicknamed Soviet response to the potential Korean unification under “Joe” served in the 8th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division. a democratic flag worried U.S. policymakers. Communist China was the major concern. Having just defeated Ground forces came from the United Kingdom (11,186), the Nationalist Chinese and reunified the mainland, the Turkey (5,051), the Philippines (1,349), Thailand (1,181), seasoned Red Army was five million strong. In fact, some Australia (1,002), The Netherlands (636), and India (326). of the best soldiers in the Chinese Communist Army were Sweden furnished a civilian medical contingent (168).
    [Show full text]
  • The Japanese American Soldier
    1 LESSON PLAN: The Japanese American Soldier Essential Question How did the role of Japanese American soldiers during World War II change Americans’ perceptions of Japanese Americans after the war? TOPIC: Japanese American Soldiers of World War II – The 100th, 442nd, and MIS GRADE LEVEL: 11-12 TIME: Part I: 50 min. Discussion and small group work with worksheet Part II: 60 min. – Documentary film and primary source newspaper study (read + discuss) Part III: 60 min – Letter writing prompt OBJECTIVES: 1. Students will recognize the designations “442nd Regimental Combat Team (RCT),” “100th Infantry Battalion,” and “Military Intelligence Service (MIS)” as units in which Japanese American soldiers fought during World War II. 2. Students will describe the contributions of the 442nd RCT, 100th Infantry Battalion, and MIS. 3. Students will explain how US involvement in World War II impacted the lives of Americans of Japanese ancestry in the US. 4. Students will analyze the attitudes and concerns of Americans and American military leaders at the start of World War II. 5. Students will evaluate the role of the 100th Infantry Battalion, 442nd Regimental Combat Team, and Military Intelligence Service in affecting attitudes in American society after the war. RESOURCES NEEDED: 1. Appendix A: Photo of Pearl Harbor after the bombing 2. Appendix B: Anti-Japanese propaganda posters from the WWII era. 3. Appendix C: Excerpt from Letter by Brig. Gen. John Weckerling to Lt. Col Carlisle C. Dusenbury on 31 December 1941. 4. Appendix C: Office of the Provost Marshall General document (excerpt): “An Opinion of the Judge Advocate General Upholding the Legality of the Military Clearance Program As Applied to Japanese American Personnel.” 5.
    [Show full text]
  • BATTLE-SCARRED and DIRTY: US ARMY TACTICAL LEADERSHIP in the MEDITERRANEAN THEATER, 1942-1943 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial
    BATTLE-SCARRED AND DIRTY: US ARMY TACTICAL LEADERSHIP IN THE MEDITERRANEAN THEATER, 1942-1943 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Steven Thomas Barry Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Allan R. Millett, Adviser Dr. John F. Guilmartin Dr. John L. Brooke Copyright by Steven T. Barry 2011 Abstract Throughout the North African and Sicilian campaigns of World War II, the battalion leadership exercised by United States regular army officers provided the essential component that contributed to battlefield success and combat effectiveness despite deficiencies in equipment, organization, mobilization, and inadequate operational leadership. Essentially, without the regular army battalion leaders, US units could not have functioned tactically early in the war. For both Operations TORCH and HUSKY, the US Army did not possess the leadership or staffs at the corps level to consistently coordinate combined arms maneuver with air and sea power. The battalion leadership brought discipline, maturity, experience, and the ability to translate common operational guidance into tactical reality. Many US officers shared the same ―Old Army‖ skill sets in their early career. Across the Army in the 1930s, these officers developed familiarity with the systems and doctrine that would prove crucial in the combined arms operations of the Second World War. The battalion tactical leadership overcame lackluster operational and strategic guidance and other significant handicaps to execute the first Mediterranean Theater of Operations campaigns. Three sets of factors shaped this pivotal group of men. First, all of these officers were shaped by pre-war experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruyeres Liberation
    I I 00 WHEREAS, during World War II, France was occupied by the German Army in June of 1940; and WHEREAS, in the fall of 1944, U.S. military forces, along with the Allies, advanced toward the Vosges Mountains of northeastern France for a final push into Germany; and WHEREAS, the 442nd Regimental Combat Team (RCT) 100th Infantry Battalion—consisting entirely of Japanese American GIs—arrived in France in October 1944; and WHEREAS, two-thirds of the 442nd RCT 100th Infantry Battalion were Nisei (second-generation Japanese Americans) from Hawai’i; and WHEREAS, the 442nd RCT 100th Infantry Battalion was instrumental in helping to liberate several towns in France, including Bruyères (liberated onl8 October 1944) and Biffontaine (liberated on 23 October 1944); and WHEREAS, in one of the most epic struggles in American military history, the 442nd RCT 100th Battalion continued forward and fought in the dense, hilly terrain of the Vosges Mountains under harsh wintery conditions to rescue the Lost Battalion, soldiers of the 141st Regiment, 36th Infantry Division who were trapped behind enemy lines; and WHEREAS, the 442nd RCT 100th Infantry Battalion suffered over 800 casualties; and WHEREAS, the Epinal American Cemetery and Memorial at the foothills of the Vosges Mountains is the final resting place for 5,255 Americans who were killed in France and Germany during World War II, including men of the 442nd RCT 100th Infantry Battalion; and WHEREAS, 2019 marks the 75th anniversary of the liberation of Bruyères and Biffontaine, and the international friendship between Hawai’i and France will continue to be celebrated and nurtured; THEREFORE I, DAVID Y.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mobile Striking Force and Continental Defence, 1948•Fi1955
    Canadian Military History Volume 2 Issue 2 Article 10 1993 The Mobile Striking Force and Continental Defence, 1948–1955 Sean M. Maloney Royal Military College of Canada, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Maloney, Sean M. "The Mobile Striking Force and Continental Defence, 1948–1955." Canadian Military History 2, 2 (1993) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maloney: Mobile Striking Force Sean M. Maloney he need to project land force power within during the Second World War. In addition to Tthe confines of the northern portion of the approving extensive joint construction projects North American continent may appear, at first like the land link with Alaska (the Northwest glance, ridiculous in today's world. In the early Highway System), the CANOL oil project and 3 years of the Cold War, both Canada and the the Northeast Staging Route for aircraft, the United States gave credibility to a land PJBD was also the clearing-house for supported air threat to North America and took continental defence planning. The most steps to meet such a contingency. The Canadian important aspect of the PJBD in this regard response was to configure the small, almost was the understanding that both Canada and token, active Canadian Army into an the United States were equal partners in this airtransportable formation called the Mobile endeavour.
    [Show full text]
  • Order of Battle Changes for Operation Phantom Thunder
    BACKGROUNDER #2 Order of Battle for Operation Phantom Thunder Kimberly Kagan, Executive Director and Wesley Morgan, Researcher June 20, 2007 General David Petraeus, commander of Multi-National Forces-Iraq, and Lieutenant General Raymond Odierno, commander of Multi-National Corps-Iraq, launched a coordinated offensive operation on June 15, 2007 to clear al Qaeda strongholds outside of Baghdad. The arrival of the fifth Army “surge” brigade, the Marine Expeditionary Unit, and the combat aviation brigade enabled GEN Petraeus and LTG Odierno to begin this major offensive, named “Operation Phantom Thunder.” Three different U.S. Division Headquarters in different provinces are participating in Phantom Thunder. Multi-National Division-North (Diyala); Multi-National Division-Center (North Babil and Baghdad); and Multi-National Division-West (Anbar). In addition to reinforcing these areas with new troops, LTG Odierno and his division commanders have repositioned some brigades and battalions that were already operating in and around Baghdad. MND-North, Diyala Operation Arrowhead Ripper The core unit in Diyala has been 3rd BCT (Brigade Combat Team), 1st Cavalry Division, which has four battalions plus reinforcements. One of its battalions, 1-12 CAV, has been stationed on FOB Warhorse. A second battalion from the same brigade, the 6-9 ARS, has been operating in Muqdadiya, northeast of Baquba. The 5-73 RSTA (Reconnaissance, Scouting, and Target Acquisition Squadron) has been operating in the river valley northeast of Baquba (in locations such as Zaganiyah). The 5-20 Infantry has been operating in and around southern Baquba. (In addition, MND-N has sent a company from 2-35 Infantry to 5-73 and a company from 1-505 Parachute Infantry Regiment to 6-9 in order to provide those battalions with infantry).
    [Show full text]
  • Groups That Made a Difference
    Name _____________________________ Class _________________ Date __________________ The United States in World War II Biography Groups That Made a Difference WHY THEY MADE HISTORY As fighting raged around the globe, Americans did their part in the war effort. For some, this required overcoming obstacles at home before serving their country on the field of battle. As you read the material below, think about the ways in which each group faced a challenge. Can you find similarities and Time Life Pictures/Getty Images differences in their responses? 100TH INFANTRY BATTALION/442ND REGIMENTAL COMBAT TEAM 1942–1945 In 1941 the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor led to the “relocation” of U.S. citizens of Japanese descent from the West Coast. They were taken to internment camps in sparsely populated states in the interior of the country. Camps were surrounded by barbed wire and patrolled by the U.S. military. Some Americans feared that people with connections to Japan would spy for the enemy or try to disrupt the American war effort. Camp residents, however, considered themselves loyal Americans, and none was ever convicted of a crime against the country. In 1942 the U.S. Army announced the formation of a fighting unit composed of Japanese Americans and Hawaiians of Japanese descent. Young men from the camps rushed to enlist. Here was a chance to demonstrate their loyalty for all the world to see. Their unit, the 100th Infantry Battalion/442nd Regimental Combat Team, fought in both Europe and North Africa. In spite of continuing prejudice, it became the most highly decorated unit of any its size in American history.
    [Show full text]
  • When the Akimotos Went to War
    The American Battle Monuments Commission presents WHEN THE AKIMOTOS WENT TO WAR An untold story of family, patriotism, and sacrifice during World War II Matthew Elms The American Battle Monuments Commission presents WHEN THE AKIMOTOS WENT TO WAR An untold story of family, patriotism, and sacrifice during World War II Matthew Elms Copyright © 2015 by the American Battle Monuments Commission Printed in the United States of America For information to reproduce selections from the book, write to American Battle Monuments Commission 2300 Clarendon Blvd, Suite 500 Arlington, VA 22201 www.abmc.gov ISBN 978-0-9790266-4-5 Honorable Merrill A. McPeak Chairman Honorable Cindy Campbell Honorable Rolland Kidder Honorable Barbaralee Honorable Richard L. Klass Diamonstein-Spielvogel Honorable Thomas R. Lamont Honorable Darrell Dorgan Honorable Constance Morella Honorable Larry R. Ellis Honorable John L. Estrada Honorable Max Cleland Secretary Table of Contents Foreward by ABMC Secretary Max Cleland 1 � Acknowledgments 4 � Dedication 7 � Battlefields of France, October 1944 8 � The Akimoto Family, 1870–1941 13 � Captives in France, October 1944 23 � Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941 26 � Fort Warren, Wyoming, 1942 33 � Captives in America, 1942–1943 37 � The Akimoto Brothers Go to War, 1943 43 � Missing in Action, October 1944 56 � Italy, 1944 61 � Johnny Will Never Come Marching Home, 1944 65 � Wounded POW, November 1944 74 � Victor in Italy and France, 1944 78 � Battle of the Lost Battalion, October 1944 82 � Amputation, 1944 85 � Ted Goes to Japan, 1945 87 � Bad Orb, January 1945 94 � Seizing Bad Orb, April 1945 99 � Postwar: What Brothers Do 105 � Lorraine American Cemetery, 2015 112 � Postscript: Understanding Sacrifice 117 � Epilogue 126 � Endnotes 130 � Bibliography 131 � Index 146 � MAPS Allied Military Advance, October 1944 10 � Japan, Pre-World War II 13 � United States during World War II 29 � Allied Military Advance through Italy, 1943–1944 78 � Allied Military Strategy in Western Europe, 1943–1944 81 � Foreward I am proud to be Secretary of one of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. Army Between World War Ii and the Korean War
    .. .....;;:·.. -� AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF No.40 March 1992 THE U.S. ARMY BETWEEN WORLD WAR II AND THE KOREAN WAR The material that follows was extracted from official history of the U.S. Army; see sources listed below. It is repeated here to remind the reader of the events following the allied victoryin World War IIwhich led to the rapid deterioration of the Army's capabilities to conduct immediate military operations. The reader should reflect on these historical events and lessons learned, and relate them to the course the Army may be forced to take in this period after the allied victory in the Cold War and Operation Desert Storm. Deja vu? Part One: Postwar Military Policy and the Army ( Demobilization The United States did not return to its prewar isolationism after World War II. The balance of power in Europe and Asia and the safety of ocean distances east and west that made isolation possible had vanished, the balance upset by the war, the protection of oceans eliminated by advances in air transportation and weaponry. A clear responsibility of U.S. membership in the United Nations was to maintain sufficient military power to permit an effective contribution to any U.N. force that might be necessary. The immediate task was to demobilize the great war machine assembled during the war and, at the same time, maintain occupation troops in conquered and liberated territories. The Army initially established as an over-all postwar goal a Regular and Reserve structure capable of mobilizing four million men within a year of any future outbreak of war; later it set the strength of the active ground and air forces at one and a half million.
    [Show full text]
  • 735Th Tk Bn in the Reduction of ;.METZ
    ARMYA, LIBRARY 00005hJ329i 735th Tk Bn in the Reduction of ;.METZ n- A RESEARCH REPORT -, N SA f Prepared at -,AV k cAQ9JD THE ARMORED SCHOOL Fort Knox Kentucky 1949- 1950 I 2soiioz 4 4 (I VII I II, - 11 /I 4 I) 'I 735mTk TANK BATTALION IN ThE REDU CTION OF METZ I AiI / -v-u--- / / _ (2 A / iI . 735th TANK BATTALION IN THE REflIJTION CV METZ AIRSEARCH BSPORT ?BEPAHYfl BY 0014ITTTEE I1I,tOFF ICERS ADVANCED 0OOURWf THE ARMIORED -SCHOOL i94I9 -19 50 LIEUTE\TANT COLONEL JOHN P. 'LUDWIKOSTCv. MAJOR GEORGE 1. ECK$RT MAJOR FLORIANTJo7.ERSPAMR MAJOR KERM4IT R. MASON MAJOR ROBERT T. -SHAVER CAP TAIN NWEL SON P. MONSON rAPTA-I JOHN H. SPEARS CAPTAIN JOSEPH. C. WETIT PORT 1KUOX, KENTUCKY MAY 19 50 '4 The stuoj of the 735th Tank Battalicn in the reduction cf I 3TZ wast select ed b y thi11s growip of offic1.6e rsaa s-an e xam-pl e Cof the use- of tanks 'in the suprort of infantry in an assault. on a fortifi3..ed area, Anl essentially infantry action was chosen as. a typ ic al e xamplIe of th is rol1e :in. World. ar IIin order to illustrate the different uses of the supporting tanks and their limitatio~ns. The compilation *f the forces engaged in this o-peration sW0vwe a large in~fantry force supported by many tanks. At first glance this indicates a fertile field for research in tank,. infantry action, however close examinationi will disclose that re-.~ lat ivel1y f ey!e xam-pl es of tanl h-inf antry action in the reduction of- g!ETZ actually occur 4, Most of the tank units w-,ere utilizedi the.
    [Show full text]
  • Nisei: the Making of the 100Th and 442Nd, the Italian Campaign, And
    2016 Research Week Proposal Instructions and Template Posters and Presentations Proposal Sample Title – Nisei: The Making of the 100th and 442nd, the Italian Campaign, and the Question of Justice Program of Study – History/ Military History Presentation Type – Choose one of the following: PowerPoint Mentor(s) and Mentor Email - Dr. David Snead ([email protected]) Student name – Olivia Allen ([email protected]) Category – Choose one of the following: Textual. Abstract example: This paper examines the establishment and achievements of the Japanese- American soldiers during World War II. The 100th and 442nd Regimental Combat Teams, unique in their heritage as first generation, American-born Japanese, were often referred to as Nisei. The Nisei soldiers made up both the 100th Division and the 442nd RCT, two segregated outfits designated for front line duty. Both the 100th Battalion and the 442nd Regimental Combat Team fought in the Italian Campaign from 1943 until 1944. During training the Nisei soldiers did not find acceptance and support for their desire to serve their country. They were frequently discriminated against, to the point of being used to train dogs to “find japs” after a commanding officer expressed that he thought “they smelled different. In Early 1943 Franklin D. Roosevelt decided to revise his position on allowing the Nisei to fight in the war. A call went out in Hawaii, where Japanese did not live in concentration camps, for 1,500 able bodied men. 10,000 men showed up to register for the newly established 442nd segregated combat unit. This study highlights the establishments of the two units and their vital contributions to the Allied forces in the Italian Campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10: Military Service
    Only 4,724 travelled ationwide,only about l, many repatriate and e were released after 'the government nor er the war. these the decline of embly and relocation ofthe few nonviolent three years of rising o expresstheir pain, mentsto the injustice il, evenso, to convey themfrom the camps. 10 MilitaryService Since their words would not have been believed, especially in wartime, Americans] communicated by action and be- "We[Japanese "We havior. are good Americans," they said. are good neigh- bors. We are useful and productive citizens. We love America " and are willing to die for her. These messageswere communi- cated by the industry of workers and businessmen and farmers, by their service to the communities in which they live, by their behavior as good citizens, and by the war record of the 442nd. lt u)as a form of cornmunication for ushich there is no aerbal or symbolic substitute. -S. 1. Hagakawar Following the attack on Pe:rl Harbor, the War Department stopped taking JapaneseArnericans into the military, and manv already in ser- vice were released. Almost from the beginning, two institutions were exempt: the Military Intelligence Service Language School (MISLS) and the 100th Battalion. By early 1943, when Nisei volunteers were again accepted, a new Nisei unit was formed, the 442nd Regimental Combat Team. Many Nisei also contributed in other capacitiesthroughout the war. Approximately 33,000 Nisei served in the military during World War II.2 Although many had come frorn the campswhere their families were still detained, Nisei service
    [Show full text]