Part 2 Service in New Zealand 1860

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Part 2 Service in New Zealand 1860 NZ PART 2 SERVICE IN NEW ZEALAND 1860 - 1867 “Come forth this way, towards me, to this place where I now stand.” (introduction to the Haka) Apart from material that has been specifically referenced, for example details of individual soldiers or from newspapers or from the PRO records, I have used material from two primary sources – Colonel Alexander’s book “Incidents of the Moari War 1860-1861”; and Lieutenant Colonel Webb’s book “History of the 12th Regiment”. Note that the Maori wars, sometimes referred to as the New Zealand wars, are now referred to as the New Zealand Land wars. New Zealand and its Provinces In 1788 the colony of New South Wales was founded. According to Captain Phillip's amended Commission, dated 25th April 1787, the colony included all the islands adjacent in the Pacific Ocean within the latitudes of 10°37'S and 43°39'S which included most of New Zealand except for the southern half of the South Island. In 1825 with Van Diemen's Land becoming a separate Colony of Australia, the southern boundary of New South Wales was altered to the islands adjacent in the Pacific Ocean with a southern boundary of 39°12'S which included only the northern half of the North Island of New Zealand. However, these boundaries had no real impact as the New South Wales administration had little interest in New Zealand. In response to complaints about lawless white sailors and adventurers in New Zealand, the British government appointed James Busby as Official Resident in 1832. In 1834 he encouraged Māori chiefs to assert their sovereignty with the signing of the Declaration of Independence in 1835. This was 299 NZ acknowledged by King William IV. Busby was provided with neither legal authority nor military support and was thus ineffective in controlling the European population. In 1839, the New Zealand Company announced its plans to establish colonies in New Zealand. This, and the continuing lawlessness of many of the established settlers, spurred the British to take stronger action. Captain William Hobson was sent to New Zealand to persuade Māori to cede their sovereignty to the British Crown. In reaction to the New Zealand Company's moves, on 15th June 1839 a new Letters patent was issued to expand the territory of New South Wales to include all of New Zealand. Governor of New South Wales George Gipps was appointed Governor over New Zealand. This was the first clear expression of British intent to annex New Zealand. Treaty of Waitangi – 1840 On 6th February 1840, Hobson and about forty Māori chiefs signed the Treaty of Waitangi at Waitangi in the Bay of Islands. Copies of the Treaty were subsequently taken around the country to be signed by other chiefs. A significant number refused to sign or were not asked but, in total, more than five hundred Māori eventually signed. The Treaty gave Māori sovereignty over their lands and possessions and all of the rights of British citizens. What it gave the British in return depends on the language-version of the Treaty that is referred to. The English version can be said to give the British Crown sovereignty over New Zealand but in the Māori version the Crown receives kawanatanga, which, arguably, is a lesser power (see Treaty of Waitangi#Meaning and interpretation). Dispute over the true meaning and the intent of either party remains an issue. Britain was motivated by the desire to forestall other European powers (France established a very small settlement at Akaroa in the South Island later in 1840), to facilitate settlement by British subjects and, possibly, to end the lawlessness of European (predominantly British and American) whalers, sealers and traders. Officials and missionaries had their own positions and reputations to protect. Māori chiefs were motivated by a desire for protection from foreign powers, the establishment of governorship over European settlers and traders in New Zealand, and to allow for wider settlement that would increase trade and prosperity for Māori. Hobson died in September 1842. Robert FitzRoy, the new governor, took some legal steps to recognise Māori custom. However, his successor, George Grey (former Governor of South Australia), promoted rapid cultural assimilation and reduction of the land ownership, influence and rights of the Māori. The practical effect of the Treaty was, in the beginning, only gradually felt, especially in predominantly Māori regions. Independence from New South Wales - 1841 Having been administered, through 1840 when the treaty was signed, as a part of the Australian colony of New South Wales, New Zealand became a colony in its own right on 3rd May 1841. It was divided into provinces that were reorganised in 1846 and in 1853, when they acquired their own legislatures, and then abolished in 1876. The country rapidly gained some measure of self- government through the New Zealand Constitution Act 1852, which established central and provincial government. 300 NZ From 1840 there was considerable European settlement, primarily from England and Wales, Scotland and Ireland; and to a lesser extent the United States, India, and various parts of continental Europe, including the province of Dalmatia in what is now Croatia, and Bohemia in what is now the Czech Republic. Already a majority of the population by 1859, the number of white settlers (called Pākehā by Māori) increased rapidly to reach a million by 1911. The Provinces When New Zealand became a separate Colony from New South Wales in 1841, the Royal Charter established three provinces: • New Ulster (North Island north of Patea River); • New Munster (North Island south of Patea River, plus the South Island); and • New Leinster (Stewart Island/Rakiura). In 1846 the British Parliament passed the first New Zealand Constitution Act, which was almost totally suspended on the advice of Governor George Grey. The only operative provisions related to the reform of the provinces. The reformed provinces were: • New Ulster (All of North Island); and • New Munster (The South Island plus Stewart Island/Rakiura). In addition, the provinces were separated from the central government for the first time. New provinces were formed by the New Zealand Constitution Act 1852 (UK). This Act established the first six provinces of Auckland, New Plymouth, Wellington, Nelson, Canterbury, and Otago. Each province elected its own legislature known as a Provincial Council, and elected a Superintendent who was not a member of the council. The councils elected their speaker at their first meeting after elections. The Act also created a national General Assembly consisting of the Legislative Council appointed by the Governor and the directly-elected House of Representatives. These provinces came into effect on 17th January 1853 and the regulations defining the boundaries of the provinces were gazetted on 28th February. Electoral regulations were gazetted on 5th March. Elections were open to males 21 years or older who owned freehold property worth £50 a year. Elections were to be held every four years. The New Zealand Constitution Amendment Act 1857 provided for the appointment of a Deputy Superintendent. The Constitution Act provided for the creation of additional provinces, and when the spread of European settlements between the original centres of provincial government and the outlying settlers grew, the General Assembly passed the New Provinces Act 1858. This Act allowed any district of between 500,000 and 3 million acres of land with a European population of no fewer than 1,000 people to petition for separation provided that at least 60% of electors agreed. As a result, Hawke's Bay Province separated from Wellington on 1st November 1858; Marlborough Province from Nelson on 1 November 1859; and Southland Province from Otago on 1st April 1861. New Plymouth also changed its name to Taranaki under the same Act. Provinces established under this act elected their Superintendents in a different way. Members of the Provincial Council would elect a suitable person listed on the electoral roll as Superintendent by 301 NZ majority. If such a person was an elected member, this would result in a by-election to fill the vacancy. Province Formed date Formed from Dissolution date Auckland 17 January 1853 New Ulster 1 November 1876 New Plymouth (Taranaki) 17 January 1853 New Ulster 1 November 1876 Hawke's Bay 1 November 1858 Wellington 1 November 1876 Wellington 17 January 1853 New Ulster 1 November 1876 Nelson 17 January 1853 New Munster 1 November 1876 Marlborough 1 November 1859 Nelson 1 November 1876 Westland 1 December 1873 Canterbury 1 November 1876 Canterbury 17 January 1853 New Munster 1 November 1876 Otago 17 January 1853 New Munster 1 November 1876 Southland 25 March 1861 Otago 5 October 1870 Almost as soon as they were founded, New Zealand's Provinces were the subject of protracted political debate. The provinces were finally abolished by the Abolition of Provinces Act 1876, during the Premiership of Harry Atkinson. For the purposes of the Act, the provinces formally ceased to exist on 1 January 1877. Following the abolition of the Provinces, local government was vested in elected borough and county councils. The Counties Bill of 1876 created 63 counties out of the old provinces. The former boundaries of the provinces served as administrative areas for the education boards set up under the Education Act of 1877 and for the offices of several Government Departments, including the Department of Lands and Survey. In 1989 the Counties were replaced by enlarged District Councils. 302 NZ Figure 10: Locations of major engagements in New Zealand. 303 1860 - NZ 1860 "So determined was the attack…" Stations Queens Redoubt (a fortification near Pokeno, south of Auckland), and Bell Block and Taranaki (now called New Plymouth). All located in the north island of New Zealand.
Recommended publications
  • Lepidozia Bragginsiana, a New Species from New Zealand (Marchantiopsida)
    Phytotaxa 173 (2): 117–126 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.173.2.2 Lepidozia bragginsiana, a new species from New Zealand (Marchantiopsida) ENDYMION D. COOPER1 & MATT A.M. RENNER2 1Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, 2107 Bioscience Research building, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-4451, USA 2Royal Botanic Gardens & Domain Trust, Mrs Macquaries Road, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia (corresponding author: [email protected]) Abstract Molecular and morphological data support the recognition of a new Lepidozia species related to L. pendulina and also endemic to New Zealand, which we dedicate to Dr John Braggins. Lepidozia bragginsiana can be distinguished from closely related and other similar species by its bipinnate branching, the narrow underleaf lobes, typically uniseriate toward their tip on both primary and secondary shoots, the asymmetric underleaves on primary shoots that are usually narrower than the stem and also possess basal spines and spurs, the production of spurs and spines, or even accessory lobes, on the postical margin of primary and secondary shoot leaves; and by the relatively small leaf cells with evenly thickened walls. Lepidozia bragginsiana is an inhabitant of hyper-humid forest habitats where it occupies elevated microsites on the forest floor. A lectotype is proposed for L. obtusiloba. Introduction The Lepidoziaceae Limpricht in Cohn (1877: 310) is perhaps the most comprehensively treated family within Australasian liverworts, having been subject to intensive and ongoing study and revision (e.g. Schuster 1980, 2000; Schuster & Engel 1987, 1996 Engel & Glenny 2008, Engel & Merrill 2004, Engel & Schuster 2001, Cooper et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 13 Spring Creek
    Marlboroughtown Marshlands Rapaura Ravenscliff Spring Creek Tuamarina Waikakaho Wairau Bar Wairau Pa Marlboroughtown (1878- 1923) Spring Creek (1923-) Pre 1878 1873 4th June 1873 Marlborough Provincial Council meeting included: This morning petitions were presented by Mr Dodson in favour of a vote for. Marlboroughtown School; from 15 ratepayers, against the annexation of a portion of the County of Wairau to the Borough of Blenheim another vote of £100 for a Library and Public Room in Havelock was carried. Mr Dodson moved for a vote of £50 for the School in Marlboroughtown, but a vigorous discussion arose upon it regarding Educational finance, in which Mr Seymour announced that Government would not consent to the various items for school buildings, and upon the particular subject being put to the vote it was lost. 11th June 1873 The following petition, signed by fourteen persons, was presented .to the Provincial Council by Mr George Dodson; To his Honor the Superintendent and Provincial Council of Marlborough, in Council assembled We, the undersigned residents of Spring Creek and Marlboroughtown, do humbly beg that your Honorable Council will take into consideration this our humble petition. That we have for some years felt the necessity of establishing a school in our district, and having done so we now find a great difficulty in providing the necessary funds for its maintenance, and we do humbly pray that your Honorable Council will grant such assistance as will enable us to carry on the school successfully, as without your assistance the school must lapse, We have a Teacher engaged at a salary of Fifty (50) Pounds per annum, and since the commencement of the school the attendance has been steadily increasing showing at the present time a daily average of twenty (20) children.
    [Show full text]
  • James Macandrew of Otago Slippery Jim Or a Leader Staunch and True?
    JAMES MACANDREW OF OTAGO SLIPPERY JIM OR A LEADER STAUNCH AND TRUE? BY RODERICK JOHN BUNCE A thesis submitted to Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Victoria University of Wellington 2013 iii ABSTRACT James Macandrew, a Scotsman who migrated to Dunedin in 1851, was variously a businessman, twice Superintendent of Otago Province, an imprisoned bankrupt and a Minister of the Crown. He was an active participant in provincial and colonial politics for 36 years and was associated with most of the major political events in New Zealand during that time. Macandrew was a passionate and persuasive advocate for the speedy development of New Zealand’s infrastructure to stimulate the expansion of settlement. He initiated a steamer service between New Zealand and Australia in 1858 but was bankrupt by 1860. While Superintendent of Otago in 1860 and 1867–76 he was able to advance major harbour, transport and educational projects. As Minister of Public Works in George Grey’s Ministry from 1878–79 he promoted an extensive expansion of the country’s railway system. In Parliament, he was a staunch advocate of easier access to land for all settlers, and a promoter of liberal social legislation which was enacted a decade later by the Seddon Government. His life was interwoven with three influential settlers, Edward Gibbon Wakefield, Julius Vogel and George Grey, who variously dominated the political landscape. Macandrew has been portrayed as an opportunist who exploited these relationships, but this study will demonstrate that while he often served these men as a subordinate, as a mentor he influenced their political beliefs and behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Zoosporic Fungi of New Zealand. I. 213-226 ©Verlag Ferdinand Berger & Söhne Ges.M.B.H., Horn, Austria, Download Unter
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Sydowia Jahr/Year: 1965/1966 Band/Volume: 19 Autor(en)/Author(s): Karling John S. Artikel/Article: Some Zoosporic Fungi of New Zealand. I. 213-226 ©Verlag Ferdinand Berger & Söhne Ges.m.b.H., Horn, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Some Zoosporic Fungi of New Zealand. I. John S. K a r 1 i n g. (Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana, U.S.A.). With Plate XLVI. Except for the species which are parasitic principally on economic crop plants, ornamentals, and trees, the zoosporic fungi have received very little attention in New Zealand, and so far several of the larger groups are only partly known. This is particularly true of the Chytridiales, Blastocladiales, Monoblepharidiales, Leptomitales and Saprolegniales. In fact, New Zealand and the neighboring Pacific islands and almost virgin lands so far as our knowledge of the occurrence of most of these fungi is concerned. On the other hand, the parasitic species, such as members of the Plasmodiophorales, Albuginaceae, Pythiaceae and Peronosporaceae, are better known and have been studied intensively by a large number of workers. Accordingly, the present studies were undertaken to enlarge our knowledge of the lesser known groups of zoosporic fungi of New Zealand. These investigations were made during the author's tenure as a Senior Fulbright Research Fellow in 1965 and 1966 and conducted principally at the various divisions of the Department of Science and Industrial Research and the University of Otago, including the Soil Bureau at Taita, Lower Hutt; the Plant Disease Division at Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Archives New Zealand Records Groups Archives New Zealand Reference Guide No.04 [Undated]
    Archives New Zealand Records Groups Archives New Zealand Reference Guide No.04 [undated] A Audit Department AD Army Department AG Agriculture Department AGG-A Agent for the General Government – Auckland AGG-HB Agent for the General Government – Hawkes Bay AIR Air Department AJCP Australian Joint Copying Project Microfilm AL Aliens Registration Branch AP Auckland Province ASC Administrative Staff College BC Broadcasting Corporation BDM Registrar General of Births, Deaths and Marriages BPC British Phosphate Commission [Auckland] BR British Resident C Customs Department CA Civil Aviation Department CFF Commission for the Future CL Crown Law Office CO Registrar of Companies COM Commissions of Enquiry CP Canterbury Province CS Civil Secretary COU County and City Councils CW Child Welfare Department DB New Zealand Dairy Board DPM Dairy Products Marketing Commission E Education Department EA External Affairs Department (Foreign Affairs) EB Education Boards EC Executive Council ED Electricity Department EL Electoral Department ENV Commission for the Environment F Forest Service FB Fire Boards Note: Some of these records are not listed in Archway Check the Series list for the full inventory (Physical ring-binder) Archives NZ References ARNZ 22499 W5657/76 FB Vols 1-2 FS Registrar of Friendly Societies FSA NZ Urban Fire Authorities Association FSC Fire Service Council FDS Fire Service Commission FSU NZ Urban Fire Authorities Industrial Union of Employees G Governor GL Government Life Insurance Office GORE-BROWN Papers of Sir Thomas Gore-Browne
    [Show full text]
  • Sir George Grey and the British Southern Hemisphere
    TREATY RESEARCH SERIES TREATY OF WAITANGI RESEARCH UNIT ‘A Terrible and Fatal Man’: Sir George Grey and the British Southern Hemisphere Regna non merito accidunt, sed sorte variantur States do not come about by merit, but vary according to chance Cyprian of Carthage Bernard Cadogan Copyright © Bernard Cadogan This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without the permission of the publishers. 1 Introduction We are proud to present our first e-book venture in this series. Bernard Cadogan holds degrees in Education and History from the University of Otago and a D. Phil from Oxford University, where he is a member of Keble College. He is also a member of Peterhouse, Cambridge University, and held a post-doctoral fellowship at the Stout Research Centre at Victoria University of Wellington in 2011. Bernard has worked as a political advisor and consultant for both government and opposition in New Zealand, and in this context his roles have included (in 2011) assisting Hon. Bill English establish New Zealand’s Constitutional Review along the lines of a Treaty of Waitangi dialogue. He worked as a consultant for the New Zealand Treasury between 2011 and 2013, producing (inter alia) a peer-reviewed published paper on welfare policy for the long range fiscal forecast. Bernard is am currently a consultant for Waikato Maori interests from his home in Oxford, UK, where he live s with his wife Jacqueline Richold Johnson and their two (soon three) children.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand's Nine Provinces (1853–76)
    W E L C O M E T O T H E H O C K E N Friends of the Hocken Collections B U L L E T I N N U M B E R 3 1 : March 2000 New Zealand’s Nine Provinces (1853–76) N 30 June 1852, after half a century of constantly changing constitutional relationships with NSW and Great Britain, the passage by the British Parliament into law of the ‘Act O to Grant a Representative Constitution to the Colony of New Zealand’ at last gave this country a settled, semi-federal system of government. New Zealand became divided into the six provinces of Auckland, New Plymouth, Wellington, Nelson, Canterbury and Otago, each with its own legislature, built around the six original planned settlements or ‘colonies’. Above them was a General Assembly consisting of the Crown-nominated Legislative Council and a directly elected House of Representatives. Sir George Grey proclaimed the coming into force of this Constitution on 17 January 1853; the boundaries of the new provinces were gazetted on 28 February; and regulations governing the elections were gazetted on 5 March. Each province had a Superintendent and a Provincial Council, both directly elected by men aged 21 or older, with freehold worth £50 a year. Elections were held every four years, each Provincial Council electing its Speaker at the first meeting after an election. Amending legislation in 1856 provided for the appointment of a Deputy Superintendent when necessary. New provinces W.P. Morrell’s The Provincial System in NZ The original Westminster legislation had always pro- 1852–76 (London, 1932; rev., 1964) describes how and vided for the creation of additional provinces, and when why the system came into being, the on-going the spread of settlement brought disaffection between relationships between the provinces and the central some of the original centres of provincial government government, the debates of Centralism v Provincialism and the outlying settlers, the General Assembly in which became prominent in 1867–68, the financial 1858 was persuaded to pass the New Provinces Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Canterbury Railways: Full Steam Ahead the Provincial Railways of Canterbury, 1863-76
    Canterbury Railways: Full Steam Ahead The Provincial Railways of Canterbury, 1863-76 A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History in the University of Canterbury by Alastair Adrian Cross University of Canterbury 2017 Abstract The broad-gauge Canterbury Railways are considered unanimously by New Zealand historians as the origins of the modern-day railway network in New Zealand. Built by the Canterbury Provincial Government in 1863 to relieve transport issues between Christchurch and Lyttelton, the broad-gauge railway later expanded to reach Amberley in the north and Rakaia in the south, opening up the Canterbury Plains and stimulating trade and immigration. Brought under the control of the Public Works Department in 1876 along with several narrow-gauge lines built by the Provincial Government, the broad-gauge was converted to the New Zealand standard narrow-gauge in 1878 and the locomotives and rolling-stock were sold to the South Australian Railways. Unfortunately, there has been little engagement with the history of the Canterbury Railways in the last fifty years and in particular with the primary sources from the period since the publication in 1964 of W. A. Pierre’s book Canterbury Provincial Railways: Genesis of the NZR. The majority of what has been written in this timeframe has been for the railway enthusiast market, and therefore has contributed to the marginalisation of the part played by the Canterbury Railways in the context of the wider New Zealand history. By engaging with period primary sources held by Archives New Zealand and suitably supported with selected secondary sources, this thesis aims to recover this history within an academic framework considering, among other themes, the prehistory of the railway before 1863, the operation of the CR network and comparisons with other Provincial-era railway operations within this period.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellington Hospital
    THE NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL Journal of the New Zealand Medical Association CONTENTS This Issue in the Journal 4 A summary of the original articles featured in this issue Editorials 7 Pay attention [to the road] or pay the price Alistair Woodward, Jamie Hosking, Shanthi Ameratunga 10 Blood safety Sarah Mant, Mark P Smith Original Articles 12 Bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates produced in New Zealand Michelle Dickson, Dorothy Dinesh 22 A tale of two cities: paradoxical intensity of traffic calming around Auckland schools Timothy Hopgood, Teuila Percival, Joanna Stewart, Shanthi Ameratunga 29 The San Francisco Syncope Rule performs well in a regional rural emergency department in New Zealand Andrew Munro, Rosie Whittaker 34 The high volume debate in a low volume country: centralisation of oesophageal resection in New Zealand Edwin Beenen, Welson Jao, Grant Coulter, Ross Roberts 46 Reduction mammaplasty and resource allocation—are patients being treated fairly? An examination of the current New Zealand situation, and looking towards the future Eloise E Dickie, Jeremy W Simcock 56 Murine typhus and leptospirosis presenting with undifferentiated symptoms of an acute febrile illness to Waikato Hospital, New Zealand, 2009–2010 James Irwin, Deon Tredoux, Graham Mills Viewpoint 67 Is it time to advocate for a vulnerable road user protection law in New Zealand? Harold Weiss, Aimee Ward NZMJ 10 May 2013, Vol 126 No 1374; ISSN 1175 8716 Page 1 of 127 URL: http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/126-1374/5647/ ©NZMA Clinical Correspondence 78 Duck shooting injuries in Southland, New Zealand Martin Watts, Ian Densie 80 Lead poisoning from Ayurvedic medicines Rayji S Tsutsui, Johan Van Schalkwyk, David Spriggs 84 Medical image.
    [Show full text]
  • A National Interpretation Scheme for Conservation Management of Historic Goldrush Sites
    A national interpretation scheme for conservation management of historic goldrush sites Tony Nightingale SCIENCE FOR CONSERVATION 262 Published by Science & Technical Publishing Department of Conservation PO Box 10–420 Wellington, New Zealand Cover: Arrowtown Chinese Camp, Otago Goldfields Park. Science for Conservation is a scientific monograph series presenting research funded by New Zealand Department of Conservation (DOC). Manuscripts are internally and externally peer-reviewed; resulting publications are considered part of the formal international scientific literature. Individual copies are printed, and are also available from the departmental website in pdf form. Titles are listed in our catalogue on the website, refer www.doc.govt.nz under Publications, then Science and Research. © Copyright January 2006, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 1173–2946 ISBN 0–478–14057–8 This report was prepared for publication by Science & Technical Publishing; editing and layout by Geoff Gregory. Publication was approved by the Chief Scientist (Research, Development & Improvement Division), Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand. In the interest of forest conservation, we support paperless electronic publishing. When printing, recycled paper is used wherever possible. CONTENTS Abstract 5 1. Introduction 6 1.1 Objective 7 2. The goldrush phenomenon 7 2.1 International setting 7 2.2 Goldrushes in New Zealand 8 3. Procedure 11 3.1 Need for interpretation 11 3.2 Current interpretation 11 3.3 Key interpretation resources 12 3.4 Thematic framework 12 4. Application of historic themes in DOC Conservancies 13 4.1 Key national stories in Waikato Conservancy 13 4.2 Key national stories in Nelson/Marlborough Conservancy 17 4.3 Key national stories in Otago Conservancy 21 4.4 Key national stories in West Coast/Tai Poutini Conservancy 26 4.5 Key national stories in Southland Conservancy 31 4.6 Wellington Conservancy 34 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Ortho-Bionomy Workshop ❖ Reiki II Workshop ❖ Tai Chi Classes ❖ Meditation; the Healing Group; Our Rooms
    Mosgiel Holistic Centre Home to practitioners who hold a holistic view to health and wellbeing MARCH 2019 “Autumn is a second spring when every leaf is a flower.” Albert Camus This month: ❖ Our Services – What is Lymphatic Drainage? ❖ Myofascial Release Workshops ❖ Thinking About Suicide by John Mills ❖ TRE – Trauma & Tension Releasing Exercises ❖ AnuCroft Products ❖ Ortho-Bionomy Workshop ❖ Reiki II Workshop ❖ Tai Chi Classes ❖ Meditation; The Healing Group; Our Rooms We offer numerous therapeutic services to our clients, including: Specialist Massage: Sports, Remedial, Deep Tissue, Lymphatic Drainage, Indian Head Massage, Thermal Hot Stone Therapy, Reflexology and Deep Therapeutic/Relaxation Massage. Other Therapies: Specific Pain Relief, Ortho-Bionomy, Reiki, Aromatherapy, Cranio Sacral Therapy and Body Talk/Kinesiology. Emotional Balance: EFT - Emotional Freedom Technique Trauma Therapy: TRE - Trauma/Stress Release Exercise Some of these therapies may be familiar to you, but some may make you wonder, “What on earth is that?”; So……… What is Lymphatic Drainage? Lymphatic drainage is a gentle, rhythmical massage treatment performed by a specially trained lymphatic massage therapist to stimulate the circulation of lymph fluid around the body. This helps to rapidly speed up the removal of waste and toxins from a sluggish lymphatic system. Lymphatic massage can also aid in the prevention of swelling after injury or surgery. It is also thought to provide a major boost to your immune system. How much do our therapies costs? ½ Hour Treatment
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of New Zealand's Unreinforced Masonry Buildings
    182 PREVALENCE OF NEW ZEALAND’S UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDINGS Alistair P. Russell1 and Jason M. Ingham2 SUMMARY Unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings remain New Zealand's most earthquake prone class of building. New Zealand URM buildings are classified into typologies, based on their general structural configuration. Seven typologies are presented, and their relative prevalence, age and locations are identified. There are estimated to be 3,750 URM buildings in existence in New Zealand, with 1,300 (35%) being estimated to be potentially earthquake prone and 2010 (52%) to be potentially earthquake risk, using the NZSEE Initial Evaluation Procedure. Trends in the age of these buildings show that construction activity increased from the early days of European settlement and reached a peak at about 1930, before subsequently declining sharply. The preponderance of the existing URM building stock was constructed prior to 1940, and as such, almost all URM buildings in New Zealand are between 80 and 130 years old (in 2010). Overall the URM building stock has a 2010 market value of approximately $NZ1.5 billion, and constitutes approximately 8% of the total building stock in terms of floor area. Details are also provided regarding the development of New Zealand building codes and the associated provisions for assessing existing earthquake risk buildings, and provides some background to the history of the URM building stock in New Zealand. of New Zealand in 1830 was probably a little more than 300. HISTORY OF NEW ZEALAND URM By 1839 the number had risen to possibly 2000, and at the New Zealand‟s masonry construction heritage is beginning of the 1850s there was 26,000 Europeans in New comparatively young, spanning from 1833 until the present Zealand.
    [Show full text]