DOCSLIB.ORG

3 Arleigh Burke Class Destroyers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3 Arleigh Burke Class Destroyers Operational Profiling and Statistical Analysis of Arleigh Burke-Class Destroyers by Travis J. Anderson M.S.E., Engineering Management The Catholic University of America, 2010 B.S., Computer Science United States Naval Academy, 2003 Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering in Partial Fulfillment for the Degrees of ARcHNES Naval Engineer MA INSTrTUTE and SSAHUSFTTS Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering cooOG at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology SA RIES June 2013 @ Travis J. Anderson. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author: Department of Mechanical Engineering May 10, 2013 01/ Certified By: / Franz Hover Finmeccanica Associate Professor Thesis Supervisor Jr Accepted By: David E. Hardt Ralph E. and Eloise F. Cross Professor of Mechanical Engineering Chair, Department Committee on Graduate Students [This page intentionally left blank] 2 Operational Profiling and Statistical Analysis of Arleigh Burke-Class Destroyers by Travis J.Anderson Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering on May 10, 2013 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Degrees of Naval Engineer and Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering ABSTRACT Ship operational profiles are a valuable tool for ship designers and engineers when analyzing potential designs and ship system selections. The most common is the speed-time profile, normally depicted as a histogram showing the percent of time spent at each speed. Many shortcomings exist in the current Arleigh Burke (DDG 51)-class operational profiles. The current speed-time profile is out of date, based on another ship class, and does not depict the profile in one-knot increments. Additional profile data, such as how the engineering plant is operated and a mission profile, do not exist. A thorough analysis of recent DDG 51 operations was conducted and new and improved profiles were developed. These profiles indicate the ships tend to operate at slower speeds than was previously predicted with 46% of the time spent at 8 knots and below as compared to the previous profile with 28% for the same speeds. Additionally, profiles were developed to show the amount of time spent in each engineering plant line-up (69% trail shaft, 24% split plant, 7% full power) and the time spent in different mission types (69% operations, 27% transit, 4% restricted maneuvering doctrine). A detailed statistical analysis was then conducted to better understand the data used in profile development and to create a region of likely speed-time profiles rather than just a point solution that is presented in the composite speed-time profile. This was accomplished through studying the underlying distributions of the data as well as the variance. Thesis Supervisor: Franz Hover Title: Finmeccanica Associate Professor 3 [This page intentionally left blank] 4 Table of Contents A BS T R AC T ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 List o f F ig u re s .............................................................................................................................................. 6 List o f T a b le s ................................................................................................................................................ 6 Acknowledgments..................................................................................................................................... 8 1 In tro d u ctio n .......................................................................................................................................... 9 1 .1 Su ccess Criteria ........................................................................................................................ 1 1 1 .2 T h esis Ou tlin e ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 2 Background and Related W ork ............................................................................................. 13 2 .1 Mo tiv atio n .................................................................................................................................. 1 3 2.2 State of the Current Practice.......................................................................................... 13 2.3 State of the Art ......................................................................................................................... 14 3 Arleigh Burke Class Destroyers .......................................................................................... 16 3.1 The Arleigh Burke Class................................................................................................... 16 3.2 Ship Characteristics and Engineering Plant ............................................................ 17 4 Data Collection and Processing........................................................................................... 20 4.1 The Collection Process...................................................................................................... 20 4.2 Data Processing....................................................................................................................... 22 5 The Operational Profiles .............................................................................................................. 23 5.1 The Speed-Time Profile................................................................................................... 23 5.2 The Engineering Plant Mode-Time Profile ............................................................ 24 5.3 The Mission-Time Profile ................................................................................................ 25 6 Profile Validation Through Fuel Use Modeling ............................................................ 28 7 A Statistical Description of the Data................................................................................... 31 7 .1 T h e A n aly ses ............................................................................................................................. 3 1 7.2 A Region of Likely Composite Speed-Time Profiles............................................ 31 7.2.1 Composite Profile with One Standard Deviation Bands........................... 32 7.2.2 Principal Component Analysis............................................................................. 33 7.2.3 The Composite Profile Range............................................................................... 38 7.3 The Individual Profiles ..................................................................................................... 39 7.3.1 Kruskal-W allis and Multiple Comparison Tests ........................................... 41 7.3.2 Chi-Square Test............................................................................................................... 43 7.3.3 The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test.......................................................................... 45 7.3.4 Summary of Individual Profile Tests ................................................................. 46 8 Applications and Effects of the New Speed-Time Profile................. 49 8.1 Stern End Bulbs and Stern Flaps.................................................................................. 49 8.2 M ethod of Calculating Fuel Usage................................................................................ 52 8.3 Fuel Estimation Results................................................................................................... 53 8.4 Effects of the Speed-Time Profile Range on Results ............................................ 55 5 9 Conclusions and Future w ork.............................................................................................. 58 References.....................................................60 Appendix A: Analysis of Ship Profiles and the One Standard Deviation Band ........ 63 List of Figures Figure 1: DDG 51 Class Speed-Tim e Profile............................................................................. 9 Figure 2: Relationship Between A Programs Expended Life-Cycle Cost and Locked-In Co st ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 0 Figure 3: The USS Preble Flight IIA DDG................................................................................... 16 Figure 4: Map of DDG Homeports and Number of Ships Assigned...............................17 Figure 5: Simplified Propulsion System Arrangement Diagram ................................... 19 Figure 6: The Data Storage M atrix.............................................................................................. 22 Figure 7: Composite DDG 51-Class Speed-Time Profile.................................................... 23 Figure 8: Engineering Plant Mode-Time Operating Profile .............................................. 25 Figure 9: Mission Type-Tim e Operating Profile .................................................................... 27 Figure 10: Speed-Time Profile with One Standard Deviation Bands........................... 32 Figure 12: Bar Chart of First Six Principal Components and Principal Component Profiles Compared to the Composite Speed-Time Profile
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2014 Ships and Submarines of the United States Navy
    AIRCRAFT CARRIER DDG 1000 AMPHIBIOUS Multi-Purpose Aircraft Carrier (Nuclear-Propulsion) THE U.S. NAvy’s next-GENERATION MULTI-MISSION DESTROYER Amphibious Assault Ship Gerald R. Ford Class CVN Tarawa Class LHA Gerald R. Ford CVN-78 USS Peleliu LHA-5 John F. Kennedy CVN-79 Enterprise CVN-80 Nimitz Class CVN Wasp Class LHD USS Wasp LHD-1 USS Bataan LHD-5 USS Nimitz CVN-68 USS Abraham Lincoln CVN-72 USS Harry S. Truman CVN-75 USS Essex LHD-2 USS Bonhomme Richard LHD-6 USS Dwight D. Eisenhower CVN-69 USS George Washington CVN-73 USS Ronald Reagan CVN-76 USS Kearsarge LHD-3 USS Iwo Jima LHD-7 USS Carl Vinson CVN-70 USS John C. Stennis CVN-74 USS George H.W. Bush CVN-77 USS Boxer LHD-4 USS Makin Island LHD-8 USS Theodore Roosevelt CVN-71 SUBMARINE Submarine (Nuclear-Powered) America Class LHA America LHA-6 SURFACE COMBATANT Los Angeles Class SSN Tripoli LHA-7 USS Bremerton SSN-698 USS Pittsburgh SSN-720 USS Albany SSN-753 USS Santa Fe SSN-763 Guided Missile Cruiser USS Jacksonville SSN-699 USS Chicago SSN-721 USS Topeka SSN-754 USS Boise SSN-764 USS Dallas SSN-700 USS Key West SSN-722 USS Scranton SSN-756 USS Montpelier SSN-765 USS La Jolla SSN-701 USS Oklahoma City SSN-723 USS Alexandria SSN-757 USS Charlotte SSN-766 Ticonderoga Class CG USS City of Corpus Christi SSN-705 USS Louisville SSN-724 USS Asheville SSN-758 USS Hampton SSN-767 USS Albuquerque SSN-706 USS Helena SSN-725 USS Jefferson City SSN-759 USS Hartford SSN-768 USS Bunker Hill CG-52 USS Princeton CG-59 USS Gettysburg CG-64 USS Lake Erie CG-70 USS San Francisco SSN-711 USS Newport News SSN-750 USS Annapolis SSN-760 USS Toledo SSN-769 USS Mobile Bay CG-53 USS Normandy CG-60 USS Chosin CG-65 USS Cape St.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Program: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Program: Background and Issues for Congress Updated September 30, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33745 SUMMARY RL33745 Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) September 30, 2021 Program: Background and Issues for Congress Ronald O'Rourke The Aegis ballistic missile defense (BMD) program, which is carried out by the Missile Defense Specialist in Naval Affairs Agency (MDA) and the Navy, gives Navy Aegis cruisers and destroyers a capability for conducting BMD operations. BMD-capable Aegis ships operate in European waters to defend Europe from potential ballistic missile attacks from countries such as Iran, and in in the Western Pacific and the Persian Gulf to provide regional defense against potential ballistic missile attacks from countries such as North Korea and Iran. MDA’s FY2022 budget submission states that “by the end of FY 2022 there will be 48 total BMDS [BMD system] capable ships requiring maintenance support.” The Aegis BMD program is funded mostly through MDA’s budget. The Navy’s budget provides additional funding for BMD-related efforts. MDA’s proposed FY2021 budget requested a total of $1,647.9 million (i.e., about $1.6 billion) in procurement and research and development funding for Aegis BMD efforts, including funding for two Aegis Ashore sites in Poland and Romania. MDA’s budget also includes operations and maintenance (O&M) and military construction (MilCon) funding for the Aegis BMD program. Issues for Congress regarding the Aegis BMD program include the following: whether to approve, reject, or modify MDA’s annual procurement and research and development funding requests for the program; the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the execution of Aegis BMD program efforts; what role, if any, the Aegis BMD program should play in defending the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2020 Full Issue
    Naval War College Review Volume 73 Number 1 Winter 2020 Article 1 2020 Winter 2020 Full Issue The U.S. Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Naval War College, The U.S. (2020) "Winter 2020 Full Issue," Naval War College Review: Vol. 73 : No. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol73/iss1/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Naval War College: Winter 2020 Full Issue Winter 2020 Volume 73, Number 1 Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2020 1 Naval War College Review, Vol. 73 [2020], No. 1, Art. 1 Cover Two modified Standard Missile 2 (SM-2) Block IV interceptors are launched from the guided-missile cruiser USS Lake Erie (CG 70) during a Missile Defense Agency (MDA) test to intercept a short-range ballistic-missile target, conducted on the Pacific Missile Range Facility, west of Hawaii, in 2008. The SM-2 forms part of the Aegis ballistic-missile defense (BMD) program. In “A Double-Edged Sword: Ballistic-Missile Defense and U.S. Alli- ances,” Robert C. Watts IV explores the impact of BMD on America’s relationship with NATO, Japan, and South Korea, finding that the forward-deployed BMD capability that the Navy’s Aegis destroyers provide has served as an important cement to these beneficial alliance relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Supply Corps Senior Leadership
    JANUARY / FEBRUARY 2017 Supply Corps Senior Leadership Happy New Year! As we begin 2017, I am optimistic that we will build on the many successes of 2016, and that we are well-positioned as a community to meet the challenges and leverage the opportunities ahead of us. One of the ways in which we are so well-posi- tioned is the strength of our team, and it is my pleasure to introduce our new Command Master Chief, Thaddeus T. Wright, who joined NAVSUP on November 2, 2016. Master A Message from the Chief Wright brings a wealth of knowledge and experience to the command and the Chief of Supply Corps enlisted community, as well as a fresh, new perspective to the NAVSUP team. This edition of the Supply Corps Newsletter features articles from the Supply Corps Senior Leadership Symposium held in Leesburg, Virginia, in November 2016. Flag Officers, Senior Executive Service members, Captains, and Captain-selects met to review the current state of our community, explore key initiatives, and prepare for 2017 and beyond. Topics such as our alignment with the Navy’s Design for Maintaining Maritime Superiority, how we plan and execute in support of the full range of military operations, the role of mentor- ship in our community, and the increasing scope of our expeditionary support, highlight not only how our supply community is evolving, but also how our mission of providing world class supplies, services, and quality of life support to the warfighter is ever-enduring. Whether you are or may one day be part of our Reserve Component or FTS Supply Corps team, I encourage you to attend the upcoming National RC Supply Corps Sympo- sium in Dallas, Texas, May 20 and 21.
    [Show full text]
  • US-China Strategic Competition in South and East China Seas
    U.S.-China Strategic Competition in South and East China Seas: Background and Issues for Congress Updated September 8, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R42784 U.S.-China Strategic Competition in South and East China Seas Summary Over the past several years, the South China Sea (SCS) has emerged as an arena of U.S.-China strategic competition. China’s actions in the SCS—including extensive island-building and base- construction activities at sites that it occupies in the Spratly Islands, as well as actions by its maritime forces to assert China’s claims against competing claims by regional neighbors such as the Philippines and Vietnam—have heightened concerns among U.S. observers that China is gaining effective control of the SCS, an area of strategic, political, and economic importance to the United States and its allies and partners. Actions by China’s maritime forces at the Japan- administered Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea (ECS) are another concern for U.S. observers. Chinese domination of China’s near-seas region—meaning the SCS and ECS, along with the Yellow Sea—could substantially affect U.S. strategic, political, and economic interests in the Indo-Pacific region and elsewhere. Potential general U.S. goals for U.S.-China strategic competition in the SCS and ECS include but are not necessarily limited to the following: fulfilling U.S. security commitments in the Western Pacific, including treaty commitments to Japan and the Philippines; maintaining and enhancing the U.S.-led security architecture in the Western Pacific, including U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Force Quarterly Joint Education for the 21St Century a PROFESSIONAL MILITARY JOURNAL by Robert B
    0107 C1 3/4/04 7:02 AM Page 1 JOINT FORCEJFQ QUARTERLY East Asian Security Interservice Training Rwanda JFACC—The Next Step Battle for the Marianas Spring95 Uphold Democracy A PROFESSIONAL MILITARY JOURNAL 0207 Prelims 3/3/04 3:14 PM Page ii To have command of the air means to be in a position to prevent the enemy from flying while retaining the ability to fly oneself. —Giulio Douhet Cover 2 0207 Prelims 3/3/04 3:14 PM Page iii JFQ Page 1—no folio 0207 Prelims 3/3/04 3:14 PM Page 2 CONTENTS A Word from the Chairman 4 by John M. Shalikashvili Asia-Pacific Challenges 6 by Hans Binnendijk and Patrick M. Cronin JFQ FORUM A Commander in Chief Looks at East Asia 8 by Richard C. Macke JFQ The PLA: In Search of a Strategic Focus 16 by Ronald N. Montaperto Japan’s Emergent Security Policy 20 by Patrick M. Cronin Assessing the U.S.-North Korea 23 Agreement by Masao Okonogi South Korea’s Defense Posture 26 by Young-Koo Cha and Kang Choi Asian Multilateralism: Dialogue on Two Tracks PHOTO CREDITS 32 by Ralph A. Cossa The cover photograph shows USS San Jacinto with USS Barry (astern) transiting the Suez Canal (U.S. Navy/Dave Miller); the cover insets (from top) include Chinese honor guard (U.S. America and the Asia-Pacific Region Army/Robert W. Taylor); T–37 trainer (U.S. Air 37 by William T. Pendley Force); refugees in Goma, Zaire, during Opera- tion Support Hope (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Review of Recent Surface Force Incidents 26 Oct 2017
    COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF RECENT SURFACE FORCE INCIDENTS 26 OCT 2017 Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Summary of 2017 Mishaps .......................................................................................................................... 11 1.3 Summary of Findings and Actions ........................................................................................................... 16 1.3.1 Poor seamanship and failure to follow safe navigational practices .................................... 16 1.3.2 Degraded watchteam performance..................................................................................................... 16 1.3.3 Erosion of crew readiness, planning and safety practices ...................................................... 17 1.3.4 Headquarters processes inadequately identified, assessed, and managed operational risks ............................................................................................................................................................... 17 1.3.5 Assessments do not reinforce effective learning ......................................................................... 18 1.3.6 “Can-do” culture undermined basic watchstanding and safety standards
    [Show full text]
  • FDRMC Det Rota Holds Change of Charge Ceremony 2021 NAVSTA
    July 15, 2021 Spain / Volume 31, Issue 13 U.S. Naval Activities Spain FDRMC Det Rota 2021 NAVSTA Rota USS Donald Cook Holds Change of Command Photo Concludes Time as Charge Ceremony Page 12-13 FDNF-E Asset Page 14 Page 18 2 July 15, 2021 | COASTLINE Fantastic Fourth, Fireworks, Farewell CO's Corner (+34-956-82-3636) to get vaccinated. more! Remember to check out each COASTLINE STAFF If you have any questions about the month’s Vamos magazine to stay up vaccine, please speak with a medical to date with all that MWR has to offer. Commanding Officer Capt. David S. Baird provider at the hospital. I remain Finally, I would like to wish fair optimistic that we are in the closing winds and following seas to our Naval Executive Officer stages of our fight against COVID, Station Rota Executive Officer, CDR Cmdr. Justin Canfield but we do still have work to do. Travel Justin Canfield and his family as Command Master Chief regulations throughout the European they depart for the U.S. after a highly CMDCM Kimberly Ferguson Union and elsewhere continue to successful tour. CDR Canfield has Public Affairs Officer fluctuate, so I encourage everyone to been an outstanding XO, and it has Lt. Lyndsi Gutierrez remain flexible and adaptable. been my privilege to serve alongside [email protected] I would like to give a shout out to him. Pre-COVID, CDR Canfield kept 727-1680 all the people who contributed to the this installation running smoothly and Deputy Public Affairs Officer incredible 4th of July Independence efficiently, and his actions throughout MC1 (SW/AW/EXW) Nathan Carpenter Fest! With help from a wide range the pandemic not only allowed the [email protected] of commands and departments to base to continue to meet mission 727-2813 Capt.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S
    January 5, 1996 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð SENATE S 101 ADMIRAL ARLEIGH A. BURKE ited with sinking one cruiser, nine destroy- American service men and women are ers, one submarine and nine smaller ships, as also the victims of these indiscrimi- · Mr. MOYNIHAN. Mr. President, our well as downing approximately 30 aircraft. Nation has lost one of its most distin- nate killers. It is no surprise that the Later, Mr. Burke became a chief of staff to first American casualty in Bosnia was guished Naval heros, Adm. Arleigh A. Vice Adm. Marc A. Mitscher, whose carrier Burke. Had World War II continued be- task forces attacked the Japanese at Iwo from a landmine. There are 3 to 5 mil- yond September 2, 1945, I might have Jima, Okinawa and Tokyo. Mr. Burke was lion landmines there, hidden under served in the Pacific under ``31 knot aboard the flagship Bunker Hill and later the snow and mud. After our troops leave, Burke,'' as he was nicknamed for his Enterprise when they were hit by Japanese millions will remain for years, taking exploits against the Japanese. Admiral suicide planes off Okinawa. their toll among the civilian popu- In 1949, during interservice disputes that lation. Few people know that land- Burke was awarded 13 decorations, in- followed the unification of the armed forces, mines caused a third of the American cluding the Distinguished Service Mr. Burke fell into disfavor with some offi- deaths in Vietnam, a quarter of the Medal, the Navy Cross, the Legion of cials of the Truman Administration by head- American deaths in the Persian Gulf Merit, the Silver Star, and our Na- ing a group of high Navy officers that cam- war, and over a quarter of American tion's highest civilian honor, the Medal paigned for supercarriers and against a stra- deaths in Somalia.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
    -- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type
    [Show full text]
  • The Goldwater Journal
    The Goldwater Journal Newsletter of the Barry M. Goldwater SAR Chapter Arizona Sons of the American Revolution May 2016 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Minutes of the April 21, 2016, Chapter meeting submitted to the National SAR for the nationwide Location: contest. Good luck Abigail! Deer Valley Airport Restaurant 702 W. Deer Valley Rd, Phoenix, AZ Our April 21, 2016, Chapter meeting was opened by President William Hearter at 6:30 p.m. with 18 Compatriots and guests in attendance. Officer reports President Hearter presented information about Ancestory.com and passed around the framed Herbert F. Robinson proclamation which will be displayed at each meeting along with our Chapter charter. Secretary/Treasurer David Swanson reported that the Chapter is in great financial shape. He also reminded everybody about the upcoming gravestone (L-R) Americanism Committee Chairman Chuck laying ceremony in Albuquerque on June 13th for the Stuller, Abigail, and Jocelyn Nevers Father of the Arizona Society Sons of the American Revolution Herbert F. Robinson. Congratulations Abigail! Bob Rearley, Flag Committee Chairman, gave an overview of our Chapter’s activity in presenting SAR What is the Sgt. Moses Adams Memorial Middle Flag certificates to worthy recipients in our community School Brochure Contest? Well, here is an overview (see article on page 2). from the NSSAR website: Chuck Stuller presented information regarding the “The contest is directed at students in the 6th, 7th, USS Stark Memorial Award and encouraged all 8th, or 9th grades, depending on which year the Compatriots who donate money or time to any veterans American Revolution is taught in their educational organization to report that activity to him (or David system—including ecumenical and home schooled Swanson).
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Navy Subsistence
    U.S. NAVY SUBSISTENCE HEADQUARTERS PERSONNEL NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMMAND 5450 Carlisle Pike Mechanicsburg, PA 17055-0791 www.navsup.navy.mil ASHORE INSTALLATION FOOD SERVICE COMMANDER USS CONSTITUTION NSF DEVESELU, ROMANIA Rear Adm. Michelle C. Skubic, SC USN Bldg. 5 PSC 825 BOX 51 Charlestown, MA 02129 FPO AE 09712-0001 CHIEF OF STAFF NSA ANNAPOLIS NSF REDZIKOWO, POLAND Capt. Timothy L. Daniels, SC, USN 58 Bennion Rd. PSC 826 BOX 1 Annapolis, MD 21402 FPO AE 09761-0001 *MWR Operated VICE COMMANDER NSF DIEGO GARCIA Michael T. Madden NAF ATSUGI, JAPAN PSC 466, Box 24, Annex 13 PSC 477, Box 4 FPO AP 96595-0024 FPO AP 96306 FLEET SERVICES SUPPORT NAS FALLON Capt. Jose L. Feliz, SC, USN NSB BANGOR (NB KITSAP) Silver State Club (717) 605-7254 1100 Hunley Rd., Suite 203 Churchill Ave., Bldg. 324 Silverdale, WA 98315 Fallon, NV 89496 *MWR-operated DIRECTOR, FOOD SERVICE DIVISION NAVAL CONSOLIDATED BRIG Lt. Cmdr. Ryan J. Wodele, SC, USN CHARLESTON NAS JRB FORT WORTH (717) 605-1854 1050 Remount Rd., Bldg. 3107 Military Pkwy. Galley, Bldg. 1506 North Charleston, SC 29046 Fort Worth, TX 76127-6200 FOOD SERVICE POLICY, GALLEY NAVAL CONSOLIDATED BRIG NS GREAT LAKES MANAGEMENT AND AUTOMATION CHESAPEAKE Great Lakes, IL 60088-5001 Charles Folsom 500 Wilderness Rd. *Contractor-operated Boot Camp Chesapeake, VA 23322 (717) 605-6941 *Satellite Mess NS GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA PSC 1005 Box 33 FLEET READINESS, MENU, NAVAL CONSOLIDATED BRIG MIRAMAR FPO AE 09593 AND EQUIPMENT 46141 Miramar Way, Suite 1 San Diego, CA 92145 NCBC GULFPORT Pamela Beward Colmer Dining Facility, Bldg.
    [Show full text]