Islamist Opposition Parties and the Potential for EU Engagement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Islamist Opposition Parties and the Potential for EU Engagement This study presents a country-by-country analysis of Islamist opposition parties ranging from Morocco to Indonesia, written by leading experts on those states. It provides clear and concise details of the histories and current policies of those parties and describes how they relate to the wider political systems of their respective countries. for EU Engagement and the Potential Islamist Opposition Parties The European Union has committed itself to advocating democratisation in its external affairs and faces a situation, particularly in its neighbouring areas of North Africa and the Middle East, where its partner countries are undemocratic and where the most influential opposition parties are Islamist. This presents an interesting challenge for EU policy makers because there are questions over some Islamist parties’ policies on matters pertaining to human rights and democratic procedures that raise questions over how Islamists should participate politically. This report argues that no single strategy is available. What is needed is for European policy makers to have a greater knowledge of the differing Islamist political parties across the countries of the Muslim world, and to be prepared to respond to the Islamist Opposition challenges and the opportunities that arise on a case-by-case basis. This study aims to help fuel this debate. Parties and the Potential for EU Engagement ISBN 951-769-195-5 Edited by Toby Archer and Heidi Huuhtanen islamismi_kannet.indd 1 19.3.2007 12:01:03 Islamist Opposition Parties and the Potential for EU Engagement Toby Archer and Heidi Huuhtanen (eds.) Ulkopoliittinen instituutti Utrikespolitiska institutet The Finnish Institute of International Affairs www.upi-fiia.fi Islamist Opposition parties and the potential for EU engagement Toby Archer and Heidi Huuhtanen (eds.) English language editor: Don McCracken Arabic language editor: Kaj Öhrnberg Layout: Pauli Pakarinen Design: Jaana Laakko Cover design: Mikael Siirilä The Finnish Institute of International Affairs Mannerheimintie 15 A FI-00260 Helsinki ISBN-10 951-769-195-5 ISBN-13 978-951-769-195-6 Printed by Vammalan Kirjapaino, Vammala 2007 Contents About the Contributors .....................................................................................................5 Foreword ............................................................................................................................ 9 Algeria .......................................................................................................................13 François Burgat and François Gèze Bangladesh ................................................................................................................25 Ali Riaz Indonesia ...................................................................................................................35 Greg Fealy Jordan ........................................................................................................................43 Janine A. Clark Malaysia ....................................................................................................................57 Farish A. Noor Morocco ....................................................................................................................65 George Joffé Pakistan ....................................................................................................................73 Iftikhar H. Malik Tunisia ......................................................................................................................93 Larbi Sadiki Islamism dialogue: Framework of Analysis ..................................................................111 List of Abbreviations ......................................................................................................114 About the Contributors Toby Archer – EDITOR Toby Archer is a researcher at the Finnish Institute of International Affairs. His areas of interest include the politics of Islamism, U.S. counter-terrorism policy, the position of Islam in Europe, and the politics of “weapons of mass destruction”. He has Masters degrees from the Universities of Leeds and Glasgow and is a PhD candidate at Manchester Metropolitan University. Dr. François Burgat – ALGERIA Dr. François Burgat is Director of Research at France’s Centre National de Recherches Scientifiques (CNRS). He works at the Institut de Recherches et d’Etudes sur le Monde Arabe et Musulman (IREMAM) in Aix-en-Provence. Dr. Burgat has taught law for seven years in Algeria, studied for five years in Cairo’s French studies Center (CEDEJ), and was director of the French Centre for Archaeology and Social Sciences in Sanaa, Yemen from 1997 to 2003. Among others, Dr. Burgat is the author of the following books: L’ Is l a m i s m e e n f a c e (1995, 2002), translated as Face to face with Political Islam (2002); L’Islamisme au Maghreb: la voix du Sud (1988, 1995), translated as The Islamic Movement in North Africa (1988-1997) and L’Islamisme à l’heure d’Al Qaïda (2005). Prof. Janine Clark – JORDAN Professor Janine A. Clark is Associate Professor of the Department of Political Science at the University of Guelph, Ontario. Her research interests include Religion and Politics in the Middle East, Civil Society and Development, Women and Development, Women and Party Politics, Civil Society and Democratisation. Professor Clark has published two books: Islam, Charity, and Activism: Middle-Class Networks and Social Welfare in Egypt, Jordan and Yemen (2004); and Economic Liberalization, Democratization and Civil Society in the Developing World, co-edited with Remonda Bensabat-Kleinberg (2000). She has also published numerous articles, including: “The Conditions of Islamist Moderation: Unpacking Cross-Ideological Cooperation in Jordan” (2006); “‘Honor Crimes’ and the International Spotlight on Jordan” (2003); and “Who Opened the Window? Women’s Struggle for Voice within Islamist Political Parties”, with Jillian Schwedler (2003). 5 I SLAMIST OPPOSITION PARTIES AND THE POTENTIAL FOR EU ENGAGEMENT Dr. Greg Fealy – INDONESIA Dr. Greg Fealy is Fellow and Senior Lecturer in Indonesian Politics at the Faculty of Asian Studies and the Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University, Canberra. His recent studies include transnational Islamist and neo-revivalist movements in Indonesia, as well as terrorism in Southeast Asia and trends in contemporary Islamic politics. Dr. Fealy has also been Visiting Professor in Indonesian Politics at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies in Washington D.C., Lecturer in Southeast Asian History at the Monash University, Indonesia analyst with the Australian Government and consultant on Indonesian civil society and election programs. Dr. Fealy’s publications include Voices of Islam in Southeast Asia: A Contemporary Sourcebook, co-edited with Virginia Hooker (2006); Local Jihad: Radical Islam and terrorism in Indonesia, with Aldo Borgu (2005); Joining the Caravan? The Middle East, Islamism and Indonesia, co-authored with Anthony Bubalo (2005) and Islamic radicalism in Indonesia: A Faltering Revival? (2004). François Gèze – ALGERIA François Gèze is the President Director-General of Editions La Découverte in Paris. He is one of the rare French personalities who have denounced the Algerian military junta as well as the support of the French State for it. Mr. Gèze has written in the following publications, among many others: Armées et nations (“Armée et nation en Algérie: l’irrémédiable divorce?”) (2005) and Le drame algérien (“La rente pétrolière: Le grand gaspillage de l’économie de rente”) (1996). He has also participated in the Revue Mouvements journal. Heidi Huuhtanen – EDITOR Heidi Huuhtanen is the Director of the Middle East Project at the Finnish Institute of International Affairs (FIIA). She has consulted on Islamism-related issues for several years, especially with regards to state weakness and radicalisation. Her research interests lie in the links between democratisation and security in the Middle East, and she has focused particularly on Syria and Egypt. She is currently researching the influence of the external security environment on Syrian authoritarianism and reform. Prof. George Joffé – MOROCCO Professor George Joffé is a lecturer at the Centre for International Studies of Cambridge University, Fellow at the Centre of Islamic Studies at Oxford University and Visiting Professor of Geography at Kings College, London University. He specialises in the Middle East and North Africa and is currently engaged in a project studying connections between migrant communities and transnational violence in Europe. Prof. Joffé is also former Director of Studies at the Royal Institute for International Affairs in London (Chatham House). Prof. Joffé’s research interests include transnational risk in the Mediterranean, legal systems and migrant communities and Euro-American relations. 6 A BOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS Prof. Iftikhar H. Malik – PAKISTAN Professor Iftikhar H. Malik is Senior Lecturer of International History at Bath Spa University. Since 2000, he has been a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society, while during 1989-1994, he held the Quaid-i-Azam Fellowship at St. Antony’s College, Oxford. During 1997-2003, he led an annual seminar at the Royal College of Defence Studies, London. Professor Malik’s areas of research are mainly U.S. history, Asian history and politics with special reference to Modern South and Southwest Asia, Muslim communities in the West, and the U.S.-Muslim
Recommended publications
  • Pakistan-U.S. Relations
    Pakistan-U.S. Relations K. Alan Kronstadt Specialist in South Asian Affairs July 1, 2009 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33498 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Pakistan-U.S. Relations Summary A stable, democratic, prosperous Pakistan actively combating religious militancy is considered vital to U.S. interests. U.S. concerns regarding Pakistan include regional and global terrorism; Afghan stability; democratization and human rights protection; the ongoing Kashmir problem and Pakistan-India tensions; and economic development. A U.S.-Pakistan relationship marked by periods of both cooperation and discord was transformed by the September 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States and the ensuing enlistment of Pakistan as a key ally in U.S.-led counterterrorism efforts. Top U.S. officials praise Pakistan for its ongoing cooperation, although long-held doubts exist about Islamabad’s commitment to some core U.S. interests. Pakistan is identified as a base for terrorist groups and their supporters operating in Kashmir, India, and Afghanistan. Pakistan’s army has conducted unprecedented and, until recently, largely ineffectual counterinsurgency operations in the country’s western tribal areas, where Al Qaeda operatives and pro-Taliban militants are said to enjoy “safe haven.” U.S. officials increasingly are concerned that indigenous religious extremists represent a serious threat to the stability of the Pakistani state. The United States strongly encourages maintenance of a bilateral cease-fire and a continuation of substantive dialogue between Pakistan and neighboring India, which have fought three wars since 1947. A perceived Pakistan-India nuclear arms race has been the focus of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Libya's Other Battle | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 2295 Libya's Other Battle by Andrew Engel, Ayman Grada Jul 28, 2014 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Andrew Engel Andrew Engel, a former research assistant at The Washington Institute, recently received his master's degree in security studies at Georgetown University and currently works as an Africa analyst. Ayman Grada Ayman Grada is an independent political analyst and cofounder of Libyan Youth Voices. Brief Analysis The escalation in and around Tripoli holds troubling parallels with the tribal divisions that precipitated Libya's bloody 1936 civil war. ibya is a fractured country whose long-simmering violence is threatening to boil over. Internecine fighting L once mostly limited to Benghazi -- where Maj. Gen. Khalifa Haftar launched "Operation Dignity" against U.S.- designated terrorist group Ansar al-Sharia and other armed Islamists -- has now spread to Tripoli. The U.S. embassy was hurriedly evacuated on July 26, and foreign governments have urged their nationals to flee the country. The Tripoli fighting erupted on July 12, pitting largely Islamist militias from the Muslim Brotherhood stronghold of Misratah and their northwestern allies against well-equipped and trained nationalist brigades from Zintan. The latter factions -- the Qaaqaa, Sawaiq, and Madani Brigades -- are tribal and back the more secular-leaning political alliance, the National Forces Alliance (NFA), but ostensibly belong to the Libyan army. The Misratan and Islamist militias have since bombarded Tripoli International Airport, which has been held by Zintani forces since the revolution ended. This battle -- in which 90 percent of aircraft on the ground were destroyed, costing over $1.5 billion -- marks a dark turn for Libya, increasing the likelihood of the country repeating its brutal 1936 intertribal civil war.
    [Show full text]
  • Marruecos Reino De Marruecos
    OFICINA DE INFORMACIÓN DIPLOMÁTICA FICHA PAÍS Marruecos Reino de Marruecos La Oficina de Información Diplomática del Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores y de Cooperación pone a disposición de los profesionales de los medios de comuni- cación y del público en general la presente ficha país. La información contenida en esta ficha país es pública y se ha extraído de diversos medios no oficiales. La presente ficha país no defiende posición política alguna ni de este Ministerio ni del Gobierno de España respecto del país sobre el que versa. JUNIO 2013 5. Gran Casablanca Marruecos 6. Guelmim-Es Smara 7. El Aaiún-Bojador-Sakia el Hamra 8. Marrakech-Tensift-Al Haouz 9. Mequinez-Tafilalet ESPAÑA 10. Oriental Tanger 11. Ued Ed-Dahab-Lagouira 12. Rabat-Salé-Zemmur-Zaër 13. Suss-Massa-Drâa Océano Atlántico 14. Tadla-Azilal Rabat 15. Tánger-Tetuán 16. Taza-Alhucemas-Taunat 1.2. Geografía Marrakech El Reino de Marruecos está situado en el extremo noroeste del continente afri- cano. Está bordeado por el Mar Mediterráneo al norte y el Océano Atlántico al oeste. El desierto del Sahara se extiende por gran parte del sur y del este de ARGELIA Marruecos. Tanto su litoral marítimo como el desierto y el macizo montañoso del Atlas marcan su configuración geográfica más determinante y su clima. Éste es mediterráneo en el norte, en la zona septentrional aledaña al macizo SAHARA OCCIDENTAL del Rif (derivación de la cordillera del Atlas); oceánico al oeste; subtropical en © Ocina de Información Diplomática. 2012 la zona sur cercana al Océano; continental en la zona central del Anti-Atlas; de Aviso: Las fronteras trazadas no son necesariamente las reconocidas ocialmente.
    [Show full text]
  • NO PLACE for CRITICISM Bangladesh Crackdown on Social Media Commentary WATCH
    HUMAN RIGHTS NO PLACE FOR CRITICISM Bangladesh Crackdown on Social Media Commentary WATCH No Place for Criticism Bangladesh Crackdown on Social Media Commentary Copyright © 2018 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-36017 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org MAY 2018 ISBN: 978-1-6231-36017 No Place for Criticism Bangladesh Crackdown on Social Media Commentary Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Information and Communication Act ......................................................................................... 3 Punishing Government Critics ...................................................................................................4 Protecting Religious
    [Show full text]
  • Islamist Vote’’
    Chin. Polit. Sci. Rev. DOI 10.1007/s41111-016-0018-y ORIGINAL ARTICLE From Peak to Trough: Decline of the Algerian ‘‘Islamist Vote’’ Chuchu Zhang1,2 Received: 14 October 2015 / Accepted: 13 March 2016 Ó The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract What are the factors that facilitate or hinder Islamic political parties’ performance in elections in the Middle East and North Africa? Why did Algerian Islamists as an electoral force declined steadily over the past two decades? Why didn’t Algerian electoral Islamists present the same mobilization capacity as their counterparts in neighboring countries did in early 2010s following the Arab Spring? In analyzing the evolution of three related variables: incumbents’ power structure and political openness; electoral Islamists’ inclusiveness and unity; and the framing process of Islamic political parties to build a legitimacy, the article tries to address the questions and contribute to the theoretical framework of the political process model by applying it to a case that is typical in MENA. Keywords Islamic political parties Á Mobilization capacity Á Algeria 1 Introduction Understanding Islamic political parties1 becomes an urgent concern following the Arab Spring, as the anti-authoritarian protests resulted in the rise of Islamists at the ballot box in 2011 in lots of countries in MENA (Middle East and North Africa) including Egypt, Tunisia and Morocco. A wider audience are now interested in 1 Islamic political parties here refer to the organizations that are ideologically based on Islamic texts and frameworks, and seek legal political participation through elections. Apolitical Islamic cultural associations and armed Islamist organizations which refuse to engage in elections are beyond the scope of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Networks of Influence in the Middle East
    an strategic dossier IRAN’S NETWORKS OF INFLUENCE IN THE MIDDLE EAST published by The International Institute for Strategic Studies ARUNDEL HOUSE | 6 TEMPLE PLACE | LONDON | WC2R 2PG | UK 1 an strategic dossier IRAN’S NETWORKS OF INFLUENCE IN THE MIDDLE EAST The International Institute for Strategic Studies ARUNDEL HOUSE | 6 TEMPLE PLACE | LONDON | WC2R 2PG | UK DIRECTOR-GENERAL AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE Dr John Chipman This publication has been prepared by the Director-General and Chief Executive of the Institute and his staff. It incorporates commissioned contributions from recognised subject experts, which were reviewed by a range of experts in the field. The IISS would like to thank the various individuals who contributed their expertise to the compilation of this dossier. The responsibility for the contents is ours alone. The views expressed herein do not, and indeed cannot, represent a consensus of views among the worldwide membership of the Institute as a whole. First published November 2019 by the International Institute for Strategic Studies. © 2019 The International Institute for Strategic Studies cover images: Top: Background: A Lebanese Hizbullah fighter near Arsal, Lebanon, 26 July 2017 (Anwar Amro/AFP/ Getty Images); main images, top–bottom: Popular Mobilisation Units fighters launch missiles targeting the village of Salmani, south of Mosul, in Iraq’s Nineva province, 30 October 2016 (Ahmad Al-Rubaye/AFP/Getty Images); Major- General Qasem Soleimani, commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) attends a meeting between Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (not pictured) and the IRGC in Tehran, 18 September 2016 (by Pool/Press Office of Iranian Supreme Leader/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images); Pro-government forces at a funeral ceremony at the Sayyida Zainab mosque in Damascus, Syria, 26 April 2017 (Louai Beshara/AFP/Getty Images) Printed and bound in the UK by Hobbs the Printers Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDERSTANDING the MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD by Barry Rubin
    June 2012 UNDERSTANDING THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD By Barry Rubin Barry Rubin, a Senior Fellow of FPRI, is director of the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center and editor of the Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal. His books include The Muslim Brotherhood: The Organization and Politics of a Global Islamist Movement (Palgrave-Macmillan, 2010) and Islamic Fundamentalists in Egyptian Politics (Palgrave-Macmillan, 2002). Other books include The Long War for Freedom: The Arab Struggle for Democracy in the Middle East (Wiley, 2005), The Truth About Syria (Palgrave-Macmillan, 2007); and Israel: An Introduction (Yale University Press, 2012). His articles are featured at the website of the GLORIA Center and in his own blog, Rubin Reports. Today, the Muslim Brotherhood is the most important international political organization in the Arabic-speaking world. It is the dominant party in Egypt’s parliament, having obtained about 47 percent of the vote there, and in the Tunisian government, having received 40 percent of the ballots. In the form of Hamas, now an explicit branch of the movement, it rules the Gaza Strip. It is the leadership of the opposition in the Palestinian Authority (West Bank) and in Jordan, while the local Brotherhood controls the internationally recognized leadership (the Syrian National Council) of the Syrian opposition in the civil war there. Much smaller Brotherhood groups exist in several other Arab countries. Yet even that is not all. The Brotherhood has become the most important group among Muslims in Europe and North America, too, often directing communities and representing them in dealings with the government and non- Muslim society as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Bangladesh 2020 Website.Indd
    BANGLADESH Quick Facts Population: 162,650,853 (July 2020 est.) Area: 148,460 sq km Ethnic Groups: Bengali at least 98%, ethnic groups 1.1% Government Type: Parliamentary republic GDP (official exchange rate): $261.5 billion (2017 est.) Source: CIA World FactBook (Last Updated August 2020) INTRODUCTION Islam exerts a profound influence on the society and politics of Bangladesh. Islamist activity in the country takes three broad forms: the traditional revivalism of grassroots movements such as the He- fazat-e-Islam, Ahl-i-Hadith, and Tablighi Jama’at; the incremental political Islam of Islamic political parties (most prominently the Bangladeshi Jama’at-i-Islami); and the more radical, subversive activism of jihadist organizations such as the Harkatul Jihad al-Islam (HUJIB) and Jagrato Muslim Janata Ban- gladesh (JMB), which seek to capture state power through unconstitutional or violent means. Since 1988, Islam has served as the state religion, although Bangladesh’s constitution allows for both freedom of religion and religiously-based politics. Terrorist attacks have been fairly uncommon in recent years, a credit to the government’s vigilance. However, heavy-handed tactics to counter violent Islamic extremism, while effective, nonetheless carry the risk of radicalizing Islamist groups that currently wish to participate in legitimate political institutions. ISLAMIST ACTIVITY Islamist activity in Bangladesh can be placed in three general categories: the traditional revivalism of grassroots movements, the incremental political Islam of the country’s Islamic political parties, and the more radical, subversive activism of jihadist organizations. The level of Islamist activity in Bangladesh differs depending on the type. Islamic revivalist groups are highly active, as measured by their ability to mobilize and to protest.
    [Show full text]
  • VANISHED WITHOUT a TRACE the Enforced Disappearance of Opposition and Dissent in Bangladesh
    VANISHED WITHOUT A TRACE The enforced disappearance of opposition and dissent in Bangladesh April 2019 / N° 735a Cover Photo : Relatives of victims made a human chain in front of the press club in Dhaka demanding an end to enforced disappearance, killing and abduction on International Human Rights Day, December 2014. (Photo by Zakir Hossain Chowdhury/NurPhoto) TABLE OF CONTENTS List of acronyms 6 Executive summary 7 Introduction 8 1. Context 10 1.1 – A conflictual political history 10 1.2 – The 2014 election 11 1.3 – Human rights in Bangladesh today 12 1.4 – Legal framework 15 1.4.1 The Constitution 15 1.4.2 The Penal Code 16 1.4.3 Other domestic laws 17 1.4.4 International legal obligations 17 1.5 – Actors 18 1.5.1 Bangladesh police 19 1.5.2 Intelligence agencies 21 2. Crime of enforced disappearance: Analysis of trends and patterns 22 2.1 – Introduction: periods and trends 22 2.2 – Modus operandi 24 2.2.1 Previous threats, surveillance, and judicial harassment 24 2.2.2 Arbitrary arrest and abduction by agents of the State 28 2.2.3 Disappeared without a trace 29 2.2.4 Conditions of arbitrary detention 30 2.2.5 Fate of the victims of enforced disappearance 32 2.3 – Categories of victims 34 2.3.1 Gender perspective 34 2.3.2 Political opposition activists 35 2.3.3 Critical and dissident voices 37 2.3.4 Persons targeted in the framework of the anti-terrorism policy 38 2.3.5 Other individuals targeted as a result of the culture of impunity 39 2.3.6 Persecution and threats against those who speak out 39 2.4 – Alleged perpetrators 40 2.4.1 Law enforcement agents and intelligence officers 40 2.4.2 Responsibility of the executive branch 42 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Islamization Project of President General Ershad in Bangladesh
    ISSN: 2186-8492, ISSN: 2186-8484 Print エシアン ゾロナル オフ ソシルサエニセズ アンドヒオメニテズ Vol. 2 No. 3 August 2013 ISLAM AS A SYMBOL OF LIGITIMIZATION: THE ISLAMIZATION PROJECT OF PRESIDENT GENERAL ERSHAD IN BANGLADESH Kazi Shahdat Kabir Associate Professor, Department of Development & Governance Studies, Northern University Bangladesh, Banani, Dhaka, BANGLADESH. [email protected] ABSTRACT The aim of this paper is to look at General Ershad’s Islamization policy during his nine years rule. This article tried to examine Ershad's rhetoric to Islam, Islamic values and incorporation of Islam as a state religion in Bangladesh. The data collected from newspapers, books, magazines and journals. The study found that Ershad who raised the 'Islamic slogan' throughout his nine-years rule, although incorporated some Islamic values in state’s social and political arena, yet the main objective of that was to legitimize his rule by getting support from the masses as well as Islam-based political parties, but failed. Keywords: Ershad, Islamization, legitimacy, Islamic slogan, Bangladesh INTRODUCTION General Hussain Muhammad Ershad, who came to power through bloodless military coup, ruled the country from 1982 to 1990. The contention is that even though General Ershad frequently talked about the "inevitability" of Islam in the state, he was not actually interested to implement Islamic ideology. His main objective was rather to gain support from the 'Islam loving' people as well as the Islam based political parties. This article argues that Ershad's rhetoric to Islam, Islamic values and incorporation of Islam as a state religion in Bangladesh was a political game, since there were no significant steps taken on the above declaration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Threat of Talibanisation of Pakistan : a Case Study of Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and North West Frontier Province (NWFP)
    This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. The threat of talibanisation of Pakistan : a case study of federally administered tribal areas (FATA) and north west frontier province (NWFP) Syed Adnan Ali Shah Bukhari 2015 Syed Adnan Ali Shah Bukhari. (2015). The threat of talibanisation of Pakistan : a case study of federally administered tribal areas (FATA) and north west frontier province (NWFP). Doctoral thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. http://hdl.handle.net/10356/65418 https://doi.org/10.32657/10356/65418 Downloaded on 05 Oct 2021 15:33:34 SGT THE THREAT OF TALIBANISATION OF PAKISTAN: A CASE STUDY OF FEDERALLY ADMINISTERED TRIBAL AREAS (FATA) AND NORTH WEST FRONTIER PROVINCE (N.W.F.P.) SYED ADNAN ALI SHAH BUKHARI S. RAJARATNAM SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES Thesis submitted to the Nanyang Technological University in fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I want to extend my deepest gratitude to Professor Ahmed Saleh Hashim and Professor Rohan Gunaratna, who encouraged, guided and helped me through the course of this study. Without their guidance and supervision, I would not have been able to finish this study successfully. Professor Hashim deserves special thanks for helping me in laying out a theoretical foundation for the study. I take this opportunity to express my gratitude to Professor Ron Mathews, former Head of Studies at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), who was always instrumental and patient in motivating me to ensure my success. I would like to thank Arabinda Acharya, former Research Fellow, for guiding my research and helping me developing knowledge and understanding of the terrorism and counter-terrorism phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • Neues Kabinett Und Regierungserklärung in Marokko
    POLITISCHER SONDERBERICHT Projektland: Marokko Datum: 26.01.2012 Neues Kabinett und Regierungserklärung in Marokko Nach intensiven Verhandlungen zwischen den vier Parteien der Regierungskoalition (PJD (islamisch-konservative Partei), Istiqlal (konservative Partei), MP (liberale Partei), PPS (Linkspartei)) wurde am 03.01.2012 im Einklang mit der neuen Verfassung - Abdelilah Benkirane (PJD) durch König Mohammed VI. zum neuen Regierungschef ernannt. Diese Regierung, die ursprünglich auf 15 bis 20 Geschäftsbereiche beschränkt werden sollte, zählt nun insgesamt 31 Ressorts mit 22 Ministern, 7 beigeordneten Ministern, dem Generalsekretär der Regierung und dem Regierungschef, wobei es jedoch keine Staatssekretäre mehr gibt. Im Vergleich zur scheidenden Regierung ist keine bedeutsame Reduzierung der Ressorts zu verzeichnen, da die letzte Regierung insgesamt 35 Vertreter umfasste. Im Gegensatz zu den ursprünglichen Ankündigungen hat die Regierungsarchitektur keine grundlegenden Änderungen erfahren. Das für die Beziehungen mit dem Parlament zuständige Ministerium wird das Ministerium für Beziehungen mit dem Parlament und der Zivilgesellschaft, wodurch der Zivilgesellschaft – der neuen Verfassung gemäß – eine wichtige Rolle übertragen wird; das Justizministerium wird das Ministerium für Justiz und Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung_Politischer Sonderbericht_Marokko_26.01.2012 1 Grundrechte - was eine Stärkung der bürgerlichen und individuellen Freiheiten bedeutet, wie sie auch in der neuen Verfassung vorgesehen ist, die den Menschenrechten ein ganzes Kapitel mit 22 Artikeln widmet. Es handelt sich um die erste, auf der Grundlage der neuen Verfassung gewählte Regierung, die somit eine im Vergleich zu ihren Vorgängern wesentlich politischere Regierung sein wird. Durch die neue Verfassung wird nämlich die Rolle der politischen Parteien beträchtlich gestärkt – insbesondere dadurch, dass ein Regierungschef aus der Partei ernannt wird, die als stärkste Partei aus den Parlamentswahlen hervorgegangen ist.
    [Show full text]