Wikipedia and Credibility

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wikipedia and Credibility University of Helsinki Department of Communication Argonaut Study Program Course: “New Media, Communication and Peace in a Global Knowledge Society” Professor: Tapio Varis Wikipedia and credibility An Essay by Douwe Alexander Hut University of Helsinki December 2005 2 Table of Contents Introduction 3 A brief history of Wikipedia 3 The Main Criticisms 4 Criticism concerning the “Wikipedians” 7 Conclusion & Evaluation 9 List of Reference 10 3 Introduction Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia in which volunteers are able to add articles. Because of it being interactive, for most researchers it is considered a blog. A blog being a page in which people are able to add articles to a site with the possibilities to create feedback. A current example, which led people and press massively criticize the Wikipedia’s credibility, was a claim of the murderers, to be more specific, an accomplice of the murderer of President John F. Kennedy whom was assassinated in 1961. Another topic which raised the issue of Wikipedia’s credibility was the editing of pod’ s by Adam Curry. Claiming to ensure its credibility it has not stopped press and academics alike to criticize its use as a valid source. In this report I will discus how it was created and with what intentions and will go in further in how the basis of criticism was created. All in all, Wikipedia is just an example of the bias validity in respect to sources. However, Wikipedia is the most well-know. Secondly, I will briefly discus the cases of Adam Curry and Iposting as well the issue of the Kennedy assassination which has created somewhat of a “hype” around the Wikipedia ‘s credibility. Finally, I will briefly discuss the criticism of Wikipedia with an over view of the until now recent criticism. A brief history of Wikipedia Wikipedia was created on 2001 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger. Wikipedia started as an complimentary project to Nupedia, now primarily know as Wikipedia’s predecessor. Unlike Wikipedia, Nupedia was an online Encyclopedia project which contained strict peer review qualifications. It were Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger whom decided to make a more open-access format. It was Ben Kovitz whom added the “wiki” concept to the project. The concept being a HTML program which easily allows editing and linking on html format. The times that followed were that of the expansion in other languages and the numerous increase of articles within the site itself. 4 Wikipedia is now seen as problematic because of its change in policy by allowing non- professionals to edit and add articles to the online Encyclopedia. One of the major competitors Britanica has already stated that it does not have concern about the competition. Britanica is another online Encyclopedia which only allows articles written by experts within the field of question. The Main Criticisms Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia in which volunteers are able to add articles. Because of it being interactive, for most researchers it is considered a blog. A blog being a page in which people are able to add articles to a site with the possibilities to create feedback. Since its creation, Wikipedia has had several form of criticism for being an online source for information. As already mentioned in the history chapter, Wikipedia has shifted from a site for people with certain expertise to post articles on the site, to an free accessible post site with clear similarities to a blog. I will briefly discuss the following criticism of Wikipedia: • Usefulness as a reference • Use of dubious sources • Quality Concerns and Difficulty of fact checking • Systemic bias in coverage and perspective • Threat to traditional publishers • Flame wars • Fanatics and special interests and Exposure to vandals • Censorship I will briefly discus most of the criticisms mentioned above. Some will have more explanation due to the importance and weight of the critique. As can already be indicated, most of the criticism being given is not only applicable to Wikipedia only, however, to the entire internet or New Media. However, those who do will be given examples related to Wikipedia only and I will not discuss it further than that in order to stay focused on the subject. 5 • Use of dubious sources The main issue when it comes to Wikipedia is its credibility sourcing. The site has stricken their posting policies after the JFK assassination claim and the Adam Curry’s role in Iposting. The question which should be asked is: What makes a valuable source? When looking at source credibility in general, the following points are the basis in which to review source credibility: • Is the author identifiable? Never use a source whose author you cannot identify. • Is the author a professional in the field? • If the author's name is unfamiliar, is the site linked to an established authority on the subject? • Has this author been referred to favorably by respected professionals in the field or by a respectable Web site? Does the document contain links to these professionals or to the respected Web sites? Are there also links from these sources that go back to the site you're assessing? • Does the author include his/her e-mail address or a mail-to: so that you can contact the author directly from the site? • Does the author include a way to contact him/her other than e-mail? • Does the Web site belong to an individual, or is it part of a site maintained by an organization, academic institution, or other group? Does it list the author's position within this group? So where does Wikipedia fit in this? Despite the fact that Wikipedia requests its users to verify it information accurately, many do not include these references to external sources. As a result it become very difficult to recall where the articles resources are originated from. This leaves the many academics to believe that most of the sources used for the articles are dubious. One possible result can be the use of Wikipedia to serve the user’s own interests. This can be a product or a organization explaining its purpose in a persuasive manner rather than in an objective one. I will further discuss this further within this chapter. 6 • Usefulness as a reference As mentioned earlier, this critical factor refers to the lack of authority within the Wikepedia site. Many critics believe that the accountability is questionable due to the fact that there is now peer review. Because of Wikipedia branding itself as an Encyclopedia, many critics of which many are academics, believe Wikipedia lacking authority. When discussing Encyclopedias, authority has been required and has been used for centuries since the creation of the Encyclopedia itself. Examples would include the rule Chinese Emperor Cheng-Zu within the Ming Dynasty over seeing the complication of the Yongle Encyclopedia . The Yongle Encyclopedia was a project occurring in the Ming Dynasty in which 2000 scholars making 8000 texts of ancient times. Another example would be the early complication of the Muslim Knowledge using the way of research under the under Islamic Isnad. The Isnad being citations of the Islamic prophet Muhammad used as backing for validity. These two examples clearly indicating that the desire for authority, concerning Encyclopedias, is a factor which comes forth out of history whether it be a political, royal or a religious authority. • Quality Concerns and Difficulty of fact checking Other factors of criticism directly related to the previous two, is the concern for the quality of the articles as well as the difficulty of fact checking. According to experts to the topic in question, the articles qualities varies greatly. A regular browser looking for information whom is unfamiliar with the subject is unable to measure its quality. As already mentioned earlier in the report, the mentioned of sources is left out in most articles. It is because of this that there is great difficulty of checking the validity of the article in question. At the conference for internet researchers in Toronto in 2003, Barbara Warnick of the University of Washington, presented three problems with assessing tradition standards of evaluating credibility on the world wide web. - General treatment of websites as being subjected to global standards 7 - Internet being self-referring or a “a self-sustaining reference system” - Internet trends resulting into incredibility and unreliability of domain names. (Warnick, Barbara, 2003) • Systemic bias in coverage and perspective This particular criticism is aimed at the coverage as well as the point of view in which the articles are written. The bias in coverage refers to the fact that some topics are more covered because of the fact that people write what they are interested in. As a result, there is a difference concerning the depth in which the article is written simply because of the personal preference of the writer. The bias of the perspective concerns the neutral point of view which Wikipedia is trying to uphold. This bias is one which is unavoidable when letting the articles be written by the general public. However, this is also one of the issues facing internet as a whole. In other words, Wikipedia is being subjected to it as well. • The threat for the traditional encyclopedias Then there is the threat for the traditional encyclopedias. Publishers and writers of encyclopedias consider Wikipedia a threat due to the fact it is for free. And will in the long run exceed in usage because of it. Criticism concerning the “Wikipedians” The following critics are created by the community itself. This community, often referred to as “Wikipedians” which are considered to be the people whom the “nature of trust” is based on.
Recommended publications
  • The Culture of Wikipedia
    Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia Good Faith Collaboration The Culture of Wikipedia Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. Foreword by Lawrence Lessig The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Web edition, Copyright © 2011 by Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. CC-NC-SA 3.0 Purchase at Amazon.com | Barnes and Noble | IndieBound | MIT Press Wikipedia's style of collaborative production has been lauded, lambasted, and satirized. Despite unease over its implications for the character (and quality) of knowledge, Wikipedia has brought us closer than ever to a realization of the centuries-old Author Bio & Research Blog pursuit of a universal encyclopedia. Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia is a rich ethnographic portrayal of Wikipedia's historical roots, collaborative culture, and much debated legacy. Foreword Preface to the Web Edition Praise for Good Faith Collaboration Preface Extended Table of Contents "Reagle offers a compelling case that Wikipedia's most fascinating and unprecedented aspect isn't the encyclopedia itself — rather, it's the collaborative culture that underpins it: brawling, self-reflexive, funny, serious, and full-tilt committed to the 1. Nazis and Norms project, even if it means setting aside personal differences. Reagle's position as a scholar and a member of the community 2. The Pursuit of the Universal makes him uniquely situated to describe this culture." —Cory Doctorow , Boing Boing Encyclopedia "Reagle provides ample data regarding the everyday practices and cultural norms of the community which collaborates to 3. Good Faith Collaboration produce Wikipedia. His rich research and nuanced appreciation of the complexities of cultural digital media research are 4. The Puzzle of Openness well presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikipedia Editing History in Dbpedia Fabien Gandon, Raphael Boyer, Olivier Corby, Alexandre Monnin
    Wikipedia editing history in DBpedia Fabien Gandon, Raphael Boyer, Olivier Corby, Alexandre Monnin To cite this version: Fabien Gandon, Raphael Boyer, Olivier Corby, Alexandre Monnin. Wikipedia editing history in DB- pedia : extracting and publishing the encyclopedia editing activity as linked data. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence (WI’ 16), Oct 2016, Omaha, United States. hal- 01359575 HAL Id: hal-01359575 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01359575 Submitted on 2 Sep 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Wikipedia editing history in DBpedia extracting and publishing the encyclopedia editing activity as linked data Fabien Gandon, Raphael Boyer, Olivier Corby, Alexandre Monnin Université Côte d’Azur, Inria, CNRS, I3S, France Wimmics, Sophia Antipolis, France [email protected] Abstract— DBpedia is a huge dataset essentially extracted example, the French editing history dump represents 2TB of from the content and structure of Wikipedia. We present a new uncompressed data. This data extraction is performed by extraction producing a linked data representation of the editing stream in Node.js with a MongoDB instance. It takes 4 days to history of Wikipedia pages. This supports custom querying and extract 55 GB of RDF in turtle on 8 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5- combining with other data providing new indicators and insights.
    [Show full text]
  • A Complete, Longitudinal and Multi-Language Dataset of the Wikipedia Link Networks
    WikiLinkGraphs: A Complete, Longitudinal and Multi-Language Dataset of the Wikipedia Link Networks Cristian Consonni David Laniado Alberto Montresor DISI, University of Trento Eurecat, Centre Tecnologic` de Catalunya DISI, University of Trento [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract and result in a huge conceptual network. According to Wiki- pedia policies2 (Wikipedia contributors 2018e), when a con- Wikipedia articles contain multiple links connecting a sub- cept is relevant within an article, the article should include a ject to other pages of the encyclopedia. In Wikipedia par- link to the page corresponding to such concept (Borra et al. lance, these links are called internal links or wikilinks. We present a complete dataset of the network of internal Wiki- 2015). Therefore, the network between articles may be seen pedia links for the 9 largest language editions. The dataset as a giant mind map, emerging from the links established by contains yearly snapshots of the network and spans 17 years, the community. Such graph is not static but is continuously from the creation of Wikipedia in 2001 to March 1st, 2018. growing and evolving, reflecting the endless collaborative While previous work has mostly focused on the complete hy- process behind it. perlink graph which includes also links automatically gener- The English Wikipedia includes over 163 million con- ated by templates, we parsed each revision of each article to nections between its articles. This huge graph has been track links appearing in the main text. In this way we obtained exploited for many purposes, from natural language pro- a cleaner network, discarding more than half of the links and cessing (Yeh et al.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Wiki? Tutorial 1 for New Wikieducators
    What is a Wiki? Tutorial 1 for new WikiEducators wikieducator.org book - Generated using the open source mwlib toolkit - see http://code.pediapress.com for more information 2 Introducing a Wiki Objectives In this tutorial we will: • provide an overview of what wikis are, • and show some examples of their different uses. • discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using wikis to develop content • describe the main features of WikiEducator What is a Wiki? The name "Wiki" was chosen by Ward Cunningham - - the creator of the first Wiki. It is a shortened form of "wiki- wiki", the Hawaiian word for quick. A wiki is a web site that is generally editable by anyone with a computer, a web browser, and an internet connection. Wikis use a quick and easy syntax to allow users to apply formatting to text and create links between pages. This simple formatting syntax means that authors no longer need to learn the complexities of HTML to create content on the web. The main strength of a wiki is that it gives people the ability to work collaboratively on the same document. The only software you need is an Wiki wiki sign outside Honolulu International Internet browser. Consequently, wikis are used Airport. (Image courtesy of A. Barataz) for a variety of purposes. If you make a mistake, it's easy to revert back to an earlier version of the document. All content sourced from WikiEducator.org and is licensed under CC-BY-SA or CC-BY where specified. 3 Examples of Wikis The largest and most talked about Wiki on the Internet is Wikipedia[1] Wikipedia is, for the most part, editable by anyone in the world with a computer and an internet connection and, at the time of this writing, contained over 1,500,000 pages.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Wikipedia Jansn
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system Niederer, S.; van Dijck, J. DOI 10.1177/1461444810365297 Publication date 2010 Document Version Submitted manuscript Published in New Media & Society Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Niederer, S., & van Dijck, J. (2010). Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system. New Media & Society, 12(8), 1368-1387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365297 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:27 Sep 2021 Full Title: Wisdom of the Crowd or Technicity of Content? Wikipedia as a socio-technical system Authors: Sabine Niederer and José van Dijck Sabine Niederer, University of Amsterdam, Turfdraagsterpad 9, 1012 XT Amsterdam, The Netherlands [email protected] José van Dijck, University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 210, 1012 VT Amsterdam, The Netherlands [email protected] Authors’ Biographies Sabine Niederer is PhD candidate in Media Studies at the University of Amsterdam, and member of the Digital Methods Initiative, Amsterdam.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Point of View: a Wikipedia Reader
    w ikipedia pedai p edia p Wiki CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW A Wikipedia Reader 2 CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW A Wikipedia Reader CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW 3 Critical Point of View: A Wikipedia Reader Editors: Geert Lovink and Nathaniel Tkacz Editorial Assistance: Ivy Roberts, Morgan Currie Copy-Editing: Cielo Lutino CRITICAL Design: Katja van Stiphout Cover Image: Ayumi Higuchi POINT OF VIEW Printer: Ten Klei Groep, Amsterdam Publisher: Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam 2011 A Wikipedia ISBN: 978-90-78146-13-1 Reader EDITED BY Contact GEERT LOVINK AND Institute of Network Cultures NATHANIEL TKACZ phone: +3120 5951866 INC READER #7 fax: +3120 5951840 email: [email protected] web: http://www.networkcultures.org Order a copy of this book by sending an email to: [email protected] A pdf of this publication can be downloaded freely at: http://www.networkcultures.org/publications Join the Critical Point of View mailing list at: http://www.listcultures.org Supported by: The School for Communication and Design at the Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (Hogeschool van Amsterdam DMCI), the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS) in Bangalore and the Kusuma Trust. Thanks to Johanna Niesyto (University of Siegen), Nishant Shah and Sunil Abraham (CIS Bangalore) Sabine Niederer and Margreet Riphagen (INC Amsterdam) for their valuable input and editorial support. Thanks to Foundation Democracy and Media, Mondriaan Foundation and the Public Library Amsterdam (Openbare Bibliotheek Amsterdam) for supporting the CPOV events in Bangalore, Amsterdam and Leipzig. (http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/cpov/) Special thanks to all the authors for their contributions and to Cielo Lutino, Morgan Currie and Ivy Roberts for their careful copy-editing.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Annual Report
    Annual Report 2018 - 2019 Contents About CIS 4 Theory of Change 6 Resource Utilisation 8 About the Team 14 Donors for Financial Year 2018-19 16 Highlights for 2017-18 18 Count of Entries 22 CIS and the News 24 Access to Knowledge 26 Openness 34 Internet Governance 36 researchers @ work 50 Telecom 54 Annexure 56 About CIS The Centre for Internet & Society (CIS) is a 10 years’ old non-profit organization with offices in Bengaluru and New Delhi undertaking interdisciplinary policy and academic research on internet and digital technologies. CIS secretariat works across several research programmes such as Accessibility (for the visually impaired and persons with disabilities); Access to Knowledge (covering copyright, patent, open data, free and open source software, open standards, open access, open educational resources, and open content); Internet Governance (on free speech, privacy, artificial intelligence, big data, cyber security, and future of work); Telecommunication (spectrum and broadband), and Researchers at Work (multi-disciplinary research on internet and digital media technologies). CIS has been associated with several regional and international research networks: Research Networks Privacy International: Member of the Privacy International network funded by IDRC Cyber Stewards: Member of the Cyber Stewards Network since 2013 Global Partnership on AI: Member of the Partnership on Artificial Intelligence to Benefit People and Society since 2017 International Self Regulatory /Multi Stakeholder Networks WIPO: Accredited NGO Global Network Initiative: Elonnai Hickok is an Alternative Board Member of GNI ICANN: Active Member of Non Commercial Stakeholder Group and Asia Pacific Representative of the NCUC in 2013 Open Data Charter: CIS is a lead steward of the Open Data Charter 4 Regional Networks CPR South: Nirmita Narasimhan has been a Board Member CPR South since December 2016 Asia Privacy Scholars Network: Elonnai Hickok and Sunil Abraham are members of the Asia Privacy Scholars Network since 2016 REGISTRATION NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Working-With-Mediawiki-Yaron-Koren.Pdf
    Working with MediaWiki Yaron Koren 2 Working with MediaWiki by Yaron Koren Published by WikiWorks Press. Copyright ©2012 by Yaron Koren, except where otherwise noted. Chapter 17, “Semantic Forms”, includes significant content from the Semantic Forms homepage (https://www. mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Forms), available under the Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0 license. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Control Number: 2012952489 ISBN: 978-0615720302 First edition, second printing: 2014 Ordering information for this book can be found at: http://workingwithmediawiki.com All printing of this book is handled by CreateSpace (https://createspace.com), a subsidiary of Amazon.com. Cover design by Grace Cheong (http://gracecheong.com). Contents 1 About MediaWiki 1 History of MediaWiki . 1 Community and support . 3 Available hosts . 4 2 Setting up MediaWiki 7 The MediaWiki environment . 7 Download . 7 Installing . 8 Setting the logo . 8 Changing the URL structure . 9 Updating MediaWiki . 9 3 Editing in MediaWiki 11 Tabs........................................................... 11 Creating and editing pages . 12 Page history . 14 Page diffs . 15 Undoing . 16 Blocking and rollbacks . 17 Deleting revisions . 17 Moving pages . 18 Deleting pages . 19 Edit conflicts . 20 4 MediaWiki syntax 21 Wikitext . 21 Interwiki links . 26 Including HTML . 26 Templates . 27 3 4 Contents Parser and tag functions . 30 Variables . 33 Behavior switches . 33 5 Content organization 35 Categories . 35 Namespaces . 38 Redirects . 41 Subpages and super-pages . 42 Special pages . 43 6 Communication 45 Talk pages . 45 LiquidThreads . 47 Echo & Flow . 48 Handling reader comments . 48 Chat........................................................... 49 Emailing users . 49 7 Images and files 51 Uploading . 51 Displaying images . 55 Image galleries .
    [Show full text]
  • A Wikipedia Reader
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Critical point of view: a Wikipedia reader Lovink, G.; Tkacz, N. Publication date 2011 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Lovink, G., & Tkacz, N. (2011). Critical point of view: a Wikipedia reader. (INC reader; No. 7). Institute of Network Cultures. http://www.networkcultures.org/_uploads/%237reader_Wikipedia.pdf General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:05 Oct 2021 w ikipedia pedai p edia p Wiki CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW A Wikipedia Reader 2 CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW A Wikipedia Reader CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW 3 Critical Point of View: A Wikipedia Reader Editors: Geert Lovink
    [Show full text]
  • Why Wikipedia Is So Successful?
    Term Paper E Business Technologies Why Wikipedia is so successful? Master in Business Consulting Winter Semester 2010 Submitted to Prof.Dr. Eduard Heindl Prepared by Suresh Balajee Madanakannan Matriculation number-235416 Fakultät Wirtschaftsinformatik Hochschule Furtwangen University I ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This is to claim that all the content in this article are from the author Suresh Balajee Madanakannan. The resources can found in the reference list at the end of each page. All the ideas and state in the article are from the author himself with none plagiary and the author owns the copyright of this article. Suresh Balajee Madanakannan II Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 About Wikipedia ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Wikipedia servers and architecture .................................................................................................... 5 2. Factors that led Wikipedia to be successful ............................................................................................ 7 2.1 User factors ......................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Knowledge factors .............................................................................................................................. 8
    [Show full text]
  • Wikipedia and Cyberculture ___/ a Platform for the Social Consensus, Or a Platform for Social Folly?
    \___ Wikipedia and Cyberculture ___/ A platform for the social consensus, or a platform for social folly? December 2007 Jamie Radul (BA General Program 1st Year) In the nineteen-thirties H.G.Wells wrote a book of essays called “World Brain,” where he called for an educational knowledge network in the form of a “Permanent World Encyclopedia," whereby "any student, in any part of the world, will be able to sit with his projector in his own study at his or her convenience to examine any book, any document, in an exact replica.” The essay "The Brain Organization of the Modern World" lays out Wells' vision for "a sort of mental clearing house for the mind, a depot where knowledge and ideas are received, sorted, summarized, digested, clarified and compared."1 Today these words seem like premonitions to our digital era, and had H.G.Wells lived to see the age of the internet, he might have been the man to begin the mass collaborative project towards his 'world en-cyclopedia'. But by the time the internet came around full swing, H.G. Wells was dead. And Jimmy Wales, internet 'web portal' pornographer / founder of free online encyclopedia, Nupedia2, was very much alive! Yes he was, and in 2001 he launched a second, free online encyclopedia that was different from Nupedia in that it was to build its articles through the consensus of a very open- ended, almost anarchistic, mass collaboration. Wikipedia was from its inception an encyclopedia that 'anyone can edit', and one of its first policies was to 'ignore all the rules'.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplopedia Imagined: Building State's Diplomacy Wiki
    Preconference Draft – To be published in the proceedings of the 2010 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems. Diplopedia Imagined: Building State’s Diplomacy Wiki Chris Bronk Tiffany Smith Rice University U.S. Dept. of State [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT undertaken during his tenure as a Foreign Service business practice advisor to the Office of eDiplomacy Considerable interest has been directed by the Obama during 2005 and 2006. The second author, a current Administration in harnessing Web 2.0 technologies such employee of eDiplomacy, served as Project Lead for as blogs, wikis, social media and cloud computing to Diplopedia from 2007 to 2009, and provides further overhaul the business of government. Addressed here is information on the adoption of the wiki’s use by the account of an enterprise wiki at the U.S. State personnel during that time and beyond. The story begins Department. That wiki, Diplopedia is currently employed with a visit from Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia’s “God-King” by the State’s employees to share subject matter and chief booster. knowledge related to the process of diplomacy . Contained herein is an account of how Diplopedia was 2. THE IDEA – MEETING MR. JIMMY conceived and became a functional system for knowledge sharing at the Department of State (DoS). As unlikely as it sounds, on the morning of April 19, 2006, Jimmy Wales, guiding light of Wikipedia, addressed participants attending the Intelink Technical Exchange. KEYWORDS: e-government, wikis, Web 2.0, social Wales delivered a single message arguing that the software, digital diplomacy, enterprise architecture. participants in the Wikipedia experiment were grown-ups and could be trusted to do the right thing in entering their knowledge into the encyclopedia.
    [Show full text]