DOCSLIB.ORG

A Review of the New English Biography of Rabbi Yoel Teitelbaum, the Satmar Rebbe,Shaul Magid

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Review of the New English Biography of Rabbi Yoel Teitelbaum, the Satmar Rebbe,Shaul Magid Satmar From As Seen By An Insider: A Review of the New English Biography of Rabbi Yoel Teitelbaum, the Satmar Rebbe Satmar From As Seen By An Insider: A Review of the New English Biography of Rabbi Yoel Teitelbaum, the Satmar Rebbe by Ezra Brand I recently bought the new biography of the Satmar Rebbe, called “The Rebbe. The Extraordinary Life & Worldview of by Rabbi ,”זי”ע Rabbeinu Yoel Teitelbaum. The Satmar Rebbe Dovid Meisels (Canada 2011, distributed by Israel Book Shop). Rabbi Meisels is related to Rabbi Teitelbaum, and a staunch Satmar chossid, so you can be sure that the views espoused in the book are Satmar’s true opinions. I also recently bought Solomon Poll’s classic study if chassidim in Williamsburg in the 1950’s, during which Rabbi Meisel’s book is also mostly set. It was interesting comparing the two very different views–that of a Satmar chossid looking back at those times, and that of a contemporary secular scholar like Poll. (See also an interesting review, and comments on it, here.) The book discusses many opinions of the Rebbe. Besides for his famous anti-Zionist opinion, the book discusses such sundry topics as the required height of themechitza in shul, metzitza b’peh, television, derech halimud, mikvaos,tznius (married women wearing sheitels, married women shaving their hair, women required to wear thick stockings—at least 90 denier), and the times for beginning and end of shabbos. It is somewhat surprising that the book doesn’t mention the Rebbe’s famous opinion that a boy and a girl shouldn’t meet more than two or three times before getting engaged. On pg. 364 the book does mention the Rebbe’s opposition to “the chosson spend[ing] time with the kallah before and after the engagement,” but no mention is made of how many times the Rebbe held the boy and girl should meet. There is a famous story told, that Reb Moshe Bick, a prominent chassidishe posek in the Bronx, decided that boys and girls should meet at least ten times before getting married. He felt that America was different than Europe, and too many divorces were happening because of improper matches. The Rebbe was strongly opposed to this. Reb Moshe Bick explained that the difference of opinion stemmed from the fact that he was a mesader gittin, while the Rebbe was a mesader kiddushin! Almost no sources other than Satmar publications are listed as sources. These Satmar sources are listed at the end of the book in the “Bibliography;” there are about thirty or so. The only non-Satmar sources I found were “A Concise History of Agudath Israel” (pg. 97), “Uvdos Vehanhagos Leveis Brisk” (pg. 137) (basically Satmar!), “Hamodia” (pg. 220), and “Rav Shach Speaks” (pg. 528). However, it is a breath of fresh air to see at least some sources listed; most heimishe publication until now have opted to leave them out. The book is notable in that it is very politically incorrect. It doesn’t beat around the bush when it confronts Reb Yoel’s opinion on Zionism. Reb Yoel was famously extremely anti- Zionist—as are both camps of Satmar today—and Rabbi Meisels emotively explains the basis of his opinion. Of course, there are a lot of polemics, such as the story on page 313, where Rabbi Meisels writes: Indeed, one measure of the impact of Vayoel Moshe is that whatever books the Zionists have since published purporting to refute it (notably Hatekufah Hagedolah and Nefesh Adah) have not been taken seriously in the general Torah world. To this day, no serious mainstream work has been written to refute Vayoel Moshe. Even those rabbis who continue to advocate voting in the Zionist elections use the terms “eis laasos” and “aveirah lishmah,” indicating that at least in theory they agree with the central concepts of Vayoel Moshe. Notice that the all-inclusive term “Zionists” is used, without even using the word “rabbis,” even though the authors of the “Zionist books” cited were undoubtedly great Talmidei Chachomim. This pattern of not giving those who hold of Zionism any titles of respect holds true throughout the book. For example, on page 294, Rabbi Yehuda Leib Maimon, the founder of Mossad Harav Kook, is referred to as “Yehuda Leib Maimon.” It is therefore somewhat surprising that on page 317, the Minister of Religious Affairs is referred to as “Rabbi Yaakov Moshe Toledano.” Maybe only Sefardim are allowed to be Zionists! On pg. 178, the book says about the Satmar newspaper, Der Yid: “The policy of Der Yid was that whenever the State of Israel (Medinas Yisroel) was mentioned, the word “Yisroel” was placed in quotation marks to show that Torah Jewry, the true Israel, did not recognize the Zionists’ right to use their name.” (Notice “Torah Jewry,” not just Satmar.) This is followed by Rabbi Meisels himself, such as on pg. 249 (“…State of “Israel.” “). Usually, just the term “Zionist state” is used (e.g., on pg. 247). It is surprising that on pg. 523 the book mention “[t]he Israeli authorities.” I am sure this oversight will be corrected in future editions. Throughout the book, the author hints to the Satmar opinion that kiruv rechokim is problematic. On page 13 he writes: “One of the secrets of the Rebbe’s success is that he never tried to perfect all of American Jewry and bring it into his fold. Instead, he worked hard to keep himself and his own community, which was mostly made up of post-War immigrants, unscathed.” Satmar is famous for disagreeing with Lubavitch on this point, however this disagreement is never stated explicitly. Rather, the author says that this is why Rabbonim before the War were not successful in planting Yiddishkeit in America (page 150): “A certain writer wrote that he heard from the Rebbe in 1955, ‘Why was I more successful in planting Torah in America than all the other gedolim who tried? Because they took in too much, they wanted to make the whole America good. In order to reach people, they had to make compromises. But I realized that Yiddishkeit can only grow if you plant perfect seeds. It doesn’t grow from compromises.” This completely ignores the fact that the Satmar Rebbe was working with people who had relatively recently been forcibly plucked from their homes in Hungary, straight into Williamsburg. On the other hand, earlier Rabbonim were dealing with people who had willingly left their very religious hometowns in Eastern Europe to go to America, a much more secular country. In addition, some of the American Jews had been in America for decades, and had gotten used to the freedom of acting how they pleased, without operating within the very strict confines of the Chassidic community. On pg. 515, the book discusses the Rebbe’s opposition to Lubavitcher chassidim putting tefillin on secular Israeli soldiers, based on halachic problems. Impressively, the book quotes the Lubavitchers answer back, albeit with a rejoinder. For some reason, the Rebbe did not like thechassidim in Borough Park. This is despite the fact that there were also Satmar chassidim in Borough Park. On pg. 400 and pg. 429 derogatory remarks said about Borough Park by the Rebbe are recounted. Very harsh words are quoted from the Rebbe about the Lithuanian derech halimud. On pg. 457, he is quoted to have said, in response to whybochurim in Litvish yeshivas “undeniably” learn with more enthusiasm and hasmadah than the Satmar bochurim: “…Here too, there is no truth in the ‘belly logic’ (boich svaros) used in these yeshivas. It’s all their own made up ideas, and it’s fun for them to think about ideas that they themselves made up.” And again: “Their style is not more than three generations old. They created it in order to save the younger generation from the Haskalah. It’s a totally new derech. We see that not one halachic authority came out from them. There is one of them who paskens shailos, and he wreaks terrible destruction. It’s a totally new derech, and it’s not Toras Emes.” The Rebbe isn’t exactly the open-minded or “eilu ve’eilu divrei elokim chaim” type. I’m curious to know which specific posek he was referring to that he feels “wreaks terrible destruction.” It shouldn’t be too hard to figure out, because he is the only Lithuanian who paskens! I’m assuming he meant Reb Moshe Feinstein, with whom the Rebbe had many halachic/ ideological disputes. An interesting story is told on pg. 474. One of the founding parents of “Bais Ruchel”– the Satmar girls’ school—came to the Rebbe with a complaint. “He [had] discovered that the teacher had instructed the girls to write the Hebrew words “Ani ohev es habeged (I love the garment) as writing practice.” Now, you might think the parent had a complaint that the sentence is grammatically incorrect. A girl writing this sentence should write “ani oheves es habeged.” Or, he complained that his daughter shouldn’t be taught to love her clothing, but rather Hashem. But no. His complaint is: “The Rebbe founded a girls’ school to raise a new generation of girls like our mothers and grandmothers in Europe. Now I see that my daughter brought home a notebook in which she wrote ‘Ani ohev es habeged.’ The Rebbetzin argues that the girls can’t be so ignorant; they are allowed to understand what they are saying when they daven. I had a grandmother who passed away at 103, and she knew the entire Tehillim and Maamados by heart.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Daat Torah (PDF)
    Daat Torah Rabbi Alfred Cohen Daat Torah is a concept of supreme importance whose specific parameters remain elusive. Loosely explained, it refers to an ideology which teaches that the advice given by great Torah scholars must be followed by Jews committed to Torah observance, inasmuch as these opinions are imbued with Torah insights.1 Although the term Daat Torah is frequently invoked to buttress a given opinion or position, it is difficult to find agreement on what is actually included in the phrase. And although quite a few articles have been written about it, both pro and con, many appear to be remarkably lacking in objectivity and lax in their approach to the truth. Often they are based on secondary source and feature inflamma- tory language or an unflatttering tone; they are polemics rather than scholarship, with faulty conclusions arising from failure to check into what really was said or written by the great sages of earlier generations.2 1. Among those who have tackled the topic, see Lawrence Kaplan ("Daas Torah: A Modern Conception of Rabbinic Authority", pp. 1-60), in Rabbinic Authority and Personal Autonomy, published by Jason Aronson, Inc., as part of the Orthodox Forum series which also cites numerous other sources in its footnotes; Rabbi Berel Wein, writing in the Jewish Observer, October 1994; Rabbi Avi Shafran, writing in the Jewish Observer, Dec. 1986, p.12; Jewish Observer, December 1977; Techumin VIII and XI. 2. As an example of the opinion that there either is no such thing now as Daat Torah which Jews committed to Torah are obliged to heed or, even if there is, that it has a very limited authority, see the long essay by Lawrence Kaplan in Rabbinic Authority and Personal Autonomy, cited in the previous footnote.
    [Show full text]
  • Syrian Regime to Chair UN Conference on Disarmament
    ISRAELI Opinion. Tradition. SECURITY THE LIE OF WHEN FIRM PALESTINIAN WEAKNESS BECOMES RAISES ‘REFUGEES’ STRENGTH $30 MILLION A2. A10. A11. THE algemeiner JOURNAL $1.00 - PRINTED IN NEW YORK FRIDAY, APRIL 13, 2018 | 28 NISSAN 5778 VOL. XLVI NO. 2351 Absurd: Syrian As Trump Meets With Emir, Jewish Regime to Chair UN Groups Emphasize Conference on Qatar’s Support Disarmament for Hamas BY BEN COHEN As US President Donald Trump hosted Qatar’s Emir Tamim Bin Hamad Al Th ani at the White House on Tuesday, American Jewish leaders cautioned that any warming of relations between Washington, DC and Doha should not overlook the emirate’s ongoing fi nancial support for Pales- tinian terrorism, along with its promotion of virulently anti-Israel and antisemitic propaganda. “Th e President should hold Qatar accountable for the destabilizing role it is currently playing in the Middle East,” Children in the Syrian town of Douma, following a toxic gas attack, April 7, 2018. Photo: White Helmets via Reuters. A Hamas military drill in the Gaza Strip in March 2018. Photo: Reuters/Ibraheem Abu Mustafa. BY BEN COHEN breathe and foaming at the mouth. global chemical and nuclear Th e Geneva-based NGO UN weapons disarmament will be like Betty Ehrenberg, the Executive Director of World Jewish Th e Syrian regime is to Watch said on Monday that it was putting a serial rapist in charge of Congress’s North American section, told Th e Algemeiner. preside over a UN conference on calling on ambassadors from the a women’s shelter,” Hillel Neuer Ehrenberg highlighted the role played by the Qatari disarmament next month, despite US, the EU and other democracies — executive director of UN Watch broadcaster, Al Jazeera, in “providing platforms to those its consistent use of chemical to walk out of the UN’s Confer- — declared in a statement.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tribu1e 10 Eslller, Mv Panner in Torah
    gudath Israel of America's voice in kind of informed discussion and debate the halls of courts and the corri­ that leads to concrete action. dors of Congress - indeed every­ A But the convention is also a major where it exercises its shtadlonus on yardstick by which Agudath Israel's behalf of the Kial - is heard more loudly strength as a movement is measured. and clearly when there is widespread recognition of the vast numbers of peo­ So make this the year you ple who support the organization and attend an Agm:fah conventicm. share its ideals. Resente today An Agudah convention provides a forum Because your presence sends a for benefiting from the insights and powerfo! - and ultimately for choice aa:ommodotions hadracha of our leaders and fosters the empowering - message. call 111-m-nao is pleased to announce the release of the newest volume of the TlHllE RJENNlERT JED>JITJION ~7~r> lEN<ClY<ClUO>lPElOl l[}\ ~ ·.:~.~HDS. 1CA\J~YA<Gr M(][1CZ\V<Q . .:. : ;······~.·····················.-~:·:····.)·\.~~····· ~s of thousands we~ed.(>lig~!~d~ith the best-selling mi:i:m niw:.r c .THE :r~~··q<:>Jy(MANDMENTS, the inaugural volume of theEntzfl(lj)('dia (Mitzvoth 25-38). Now join us aswestartfromthebeginning. The En~yclop~dia provides yau with • , • A panciramicviewofthe entire Torah .Laws, cust9ms and details about each Mitzvah The pririlafy reasons and insights for each Mitzvah. tteas.. ury.· of Mid. ra. shim and stories from Cha. zal... and m.uc.h.. n\ ''"'''''' The Encyclopedia of the Taryag Mitzvoth The Taryag Legacy Foundation is a family treasure that is guaranteed to wishes to thank enrich, inspire, and elevate every Jewish home.
    [Show full text]
  • Players: Torah - God Midrash Bereshit Rabbah Midrash Devarim Rabbah Rashi - R
    Players: Torah - God Midrash Bereshit Rabbah Midrash Devarim Rabbah Rashi - R. Shlomo Yitzhaki (1040-1105) Ibn Ezra - R. Avraham ibn Ezra (1092-1167) Ramban - R. Moshe ben Nahman Gerondi (1194-1270) Zohar - R. Moshe de Leon (1250-1305) Seforno - R. Ovadiah ben Yaakov Seforno (1475-1550) Sefat Emet – R. Yehudah Aryeh Leib Alter (1847-1905) Martin Buber (1878-1965) Rabbi Bradley Shavit Artson - Dean, Ziegler School of Rabbinic Studies Rabbi Cheryl Peretz - Associate Dean, Ziegler School of Rabbinic Studies Dr. Richard Elliot Friedman - Ann and Jay Davis Professor of Jewish Studies, University of Georgia. Obi-Wan Kenobi – Really Powerful Jedi Master Narrator: Rabbi Aaron Alexander – Assistant Dean, Ziegler School of Rabbinic Studies Genesis 6:9: “These are the records of Noah. He was a virtuous man. He was unblemished in his age...” Narrator: Hey! Why do we have these additional words "in his age"? Couldn’t the Torah have just said that Noah was virtuous and righteous? Rashi: Well, the Midrash claims that this seemingly superfluous phrase can be read in two different ways. 1) It is to Noah's praise. If he had lived in a time where being righteous was common, he would have been seen as extremely righteous. 2) On the other hand, “in his age” could also be read to his discredit. He was only righteous in the age that he lived. If, however, he had lived in Abraham’s generation, he would have been your average Joe! Ramban: Rashi, seriously; the correct read is that Noah alone was the righteous man in his age, worthy of being saved from the flood.
    [Show full text]
  • Heavy Heart the Judaism Site
    Torah.org Heavy Heart The Judaism Site https://torah.org/torah-portion/dvartorah-5760-bo/ HEAVY HEART by Rabbi Dovid Green "And G-d said to Moshe 'come to Pharaoh, for I have made his heart heavy...'" This means that G-d Himself gave Pharaoh the strength to stand up against His coercion to free the Children of Israel. G-d made clear to Moshe that He is behind the difficulties which the Children of Israel were experiencing. Had we been in Egypt, we might have just seen a very stubborn Pharaoh and felt the oppression of his domination over us. We may have wondered when and if this all would end. However, the truth of the matter is that G-d Himself was really at the helm, navigating. Rabbi Yehudah Aryeh Leib Alter (19th cent.) writes in "Sfas Emes" that from this parsha one can derive much encouragement in facing the hardships we encounter in trying to do the right thing. G- d, Who has only our good in mind, is the One Who is maintaining the hardships we may find ourselves in. Nevertheless, just as in Egypt, our difficulties are purposeful. One might conclude from the existence of opposition to good that G-d is weak. Rabbi Alter points out that it is really just the opposite. The patience and control that G-d shows by giving mankind strength to go against His will is a more profound manifestation of strength than that of obliterating evil. A great rabbi once sent his son out to collect money for an urgent cause.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Surpasses US in Daily COVID Mortality Relative to Population
    JERUSALEM Opinion. Tradition. TRIBUTE TIMES FAVORS END SPARKS ONE-STATE WITHOUT VIRAL SOLUTION AN ENDING CHALLENGE A2. A10. A11. THE algemeiner JOURNAL SUCCOT EDITION $1.00 - PRINTED IN NEW YORK FRIDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2020 | 14 TISHREI 5781 VOL. XLVII NO. 2474 Israel Surpasses US Passage of ‘One- Sided’ Pro-BDS in Daily COVID Resolution at Mortality Relative Columbia Decried to Population BY JORDAN ESRIG Undergraduate students at Columbia University in New York City have voted in favor of a referendum calling on their school to “divest its stocks, funds, and endowment from companies that profit from the State of Israel’s apart- heid system and military occupation” in the Palestinian territories. According to the Columbia College’s student govern- ment, “the number of votes in favor of resolution (61.04%) exceeded both the number of votes against and in abstention.” Hospital staff , at Sourasky Medical Center (Ichilov), Tel Aviv, Israel, Sept. 21, 2020. Photo: Reuters / Ronen Zvulun. Columbia University. Photo: Students Supporting Israel at Columbia University. The referendum was an initiative of the “Columbia BY ISRAEL HAYOM/ test positive for coronavirus on a have seen morbidity and mortality University Apartheid Divest” (CUAD) student group — a daily basis is currently the highest spike, requiring the government “joint campaign launched by Columbia Students for Justice JNS.org in the world. to impose a second nationwide in Palestine and Columbia/Barnard Jewish Voice for Peace.” The daily deaths per capita lockdown in an effort to curb the Voting began last Tuesday and ran through Friday — Israel’s daily tally of corona- are calculated by the task force spread of the virus.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fresh Perspective on the History of Hasidic Judaism
    eSharp Issue 20: New Horizons A Fresh Perspective on the History of Hasidic Judaism Eva van Loenen (University of Southampton) Introduction In this article, I shall examine the history of Hasidic Judaism, a mystical,1 ultra-orthodox2 branch of Judaism, which values joyfully worshipping God’s presence in nature as highly as the strict observance of the laws of Torah3 and Talmud.4 In spite of being understudied, the history of Hasidic Judaism has divided historians until today. Indeed, Hasidic Jewish history is not one monolithic, clear-cut, straightforward chronicle. Rather, each scholar has created his own narrative and each one is as different as its author. While a brief introduction such as this cannot enter into all the myriad divergences and similarities between these stories, what I will attempt to do here is to incorporate and compare an array of different views in order to summarise the history of Hasidism and provide a more objective analysis, which has not yet been undertaken. Furthermore, my historical introduction in Hasidic Judaism will exemplify how mystical branches of mainstream religions might develop and shed light on an under-researched division of Judaism. The main focus of 1 Mystical movements strive for a personal experience of God or of his presence and values intuitive, spiritual insight or revelationary knowledge. The knowledge gained is generally ‘esoteric’ (‘within’ or hidden), leading to the term ‘esotericism’ as opposed to exoteric, based on the external reality which can be attested by anyone. 2 Ultra-orthodox Jews adhere most strictly to Jewish law as the holy word of God, delivered perfectly and completely to Moses on Mount Sinai.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlighting the Impact of Revel
    HIGHLIGHTING THE IMPACT OF REVEL BERNARD REVEL GRADUATE SCHOOL OF JEWISH STUDIES YESHIVA UNIVERSITY Highlighting the Impact of Revel To honor the eightieth anniversary of the founding of the Bernard Revel Graduate School, we highlight the impact that Revel has had on Jewish scholarship, education, and leadership worldwide. Inside this pamphlet are 80 publications, lectures, and courses presented by Revel faculty and alumni during Revel’s eightieth year. This is a sample of the hundreds of presentations delivered over the years. PUBLICATIONS Rabbi Hayyim Angel “Controversies over the Historicity of Biblical Passages in Traditional Commentary,” Increasing Peace through Balanced Torah Study, Conversations 27. Dr. Joseph Angel “A Newly Discovered Interpretation of Isaiah 40:12-13 in the Song of the Sage.” Ha-Ish Moshe: Studies in Scriptural Interpretation in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Related Literature in Honor of Moshe J. Bernstein (Brill, 2017) . Rabbi Yitzchak Blau “Idolatry and Martyrdom,” Torah U’Madda Journal. Dr. Elisheva Carlebach Essay in Reimagined: 45 Years of Jewish Art (Glitterati Inc., 2016). Rabbi Shalom Carmy “’It Can Sink So Low and No Lower: On Fanaticism and Dogma,’” Tradition 50:1 Dr. Yaakov Elman Co-author. “The Quantification of Religious Obligation in Second Temple Jerusalem.” Ha-Ish Moshe: Studies in Scriptural Interpretation in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Related Literature in Honor of Moshe J. Bernstein (Brill, 2017). Dr. Steven Fine The Menorah: From the Bible to Modern Israel (Harvard University Press, 2016). Dr. Ezra Frazer Abraham Ibn Ezra on Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi: A Critical Edition, Translation, and Super Commentary with an Analytic Introduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Sinful Thoughts: Comments on Sin, Failure, Free Will, and Related Topics Based on David Bashevkin’S New Book Sin•A•Gogue: Sin and Failure in Jewish Thought
    Sinful Thoughts: Comments on Sin, Failure, Free Will, and Related Topics Based on David Bashevkin’s new book Sin•a•gogue: Sin and Failure in Jewish Thought Sinful Thoughts: Comments on Sin, Failure, Free Will, and Related Topics Based on David Bashevkin’s new book Sin•a•gogue: Sin and Failure in Jewish Thought (Boston: Academic Studies Press, 2019) By Rabbi Yitzchok Oratz A Bashevkin-inspired Bio Blurb:[1] Rabbi Yitzchok Oratz is Rabbi of the Monmouth Torah Links community in Marlboro, NJ. His writings can be found in various rabbinic and popular journals, including Hakira, Ohr Yisroel, Nehoroy, Nitay Ne’emanim, and on Aish, Times of Israel, Torah Links, Seforim Blog, and elsewhere. His writings are rejected as often as they are accepted, and the four books he is currently working on will likely never see the light of day. “I’d rather laugh[2] with the sinners than cry with the saints; the sinners are much more fun.”[3] Fortunate is the man who follows not the advice of the wicked, nor stood in the path of the sinners, nor sat in the session of the scorners. (Psalms 1:1) One who hopes is always happy [and] without pain . hope keeps one alive . even one who has minimal good deeds . has hope . one who hopes, even if he enters Hell, he will be taken out . his hope is his purity, literally the Mikvah [4] of Yisroel . and this is the secret of repentance . (Ramchal, Derush ha-Kivuy) [5] Rabbi David Bashevkin is a man deeply steeped in sin.
    [Show full text]
  • Chassidus on the Chassidus on the Parsha +
    LIGHTS OF OUR RIGHTEOUS TZADDIKIM בעזרת ה ' יתבר A Tzaddik, or righteous person , makes everyone else appear righteous before Hashem by advocating for them and finding their merits. Kedushas Levi, Parshas Noach (Bereishis 7:1) VA’ES CHA NAN _ CHASSIDUS ON THE PARSHA + Dvar Torah Deciphered Messages The Torah tells us ( Shemos 19:19) that when the Jewish people gathered at Mount Sinai to receive the Torah , “Moshe spoke and Hashem answered him with a voice.” The Gemora (Berochos 45a) der ives from this pasuk the principle that that an interpreter should not speak more loudly than the reader whose words he is translating. Tosafos immediately ask the obvious question: from that pasuk we see actually see the opposite: that the reader should n ot speak more loudly than the interpreter. We know, says Rav Levi Yitzchok, that Moshe’s nevua (prophecy) was different from that of the other nevi’im (prophets) in that “the Shechina was speaking through Moshe’s throat”. This means that the interpretation of the nevuos of the other nevi’im is not dependent on the comprehension of the people who hear it. The nevua arrives in this world in the mind of the novi and passes through the filter of his perspectives. The resulting message is the essence of the nevua. When Moshe prophesied, however, it was as if the Shechina spoke from his throat directly to all the people on their particular level of understanding. Consequently, his nevuos were directly accessible to all people. In this sense then, Moshe was the rea der of the nevua , and Hashem was the interpreter.
    [Show full text]
  • Intermarriage Officiation: Rabbi Andrea London Beth Emet the Free Synagogue March 11, 2010
    Intermarriage Officiation: Rabbi Andrea London Beth Emet The Free Synagogue March 11, 2010 Preface During nearly 14 years as a rabbi, it has been my practice not to officiate at intermarriages. Today, after concentrated study and deliberation, reflection on the heterogeneous society in which we live, thorough exploration of Jewish texts and Reform interpretations of Jewish tradition, I have decided to change my stance, and will, under prescribed circumstances, officiate at marriages between Jews and non-Jews. Since this decision portends a significant departure for Beth Emet The Free Synagogue, this document summarizes the study and thought leading up to my decision, and provides the base for discussion, explanation and dialogue within our community. Background The leadership of Beth Emet has long been aware of the need to reach out in special ways to make intermarried couples and their families feel included and comfortable in the congregation. The rabbis have taken steps to define appropriate roles and boundaries so that family members who are not Jewish1 are included in life-cycle events.2 3 The Interfaith Outreach Committee works to create programs that address the issues and concerns of intermarried couples and their families. Yet neither the Interfaith Outreach Committee nor the policies and practices we have introduced were intended to address the issue of rabbinic officiation at marriages between Jews and non-Jews. We have heard time and again from congregants who were hurt that they or their children were “denied” rabbinic officiation at their weddings. And opposition to intermarriage officiation has fostered the impression that Beth Emet is not a welcoming place for intermarried couples and their families.
    [Show full text]
  • Lelov: Cultural Memory and a Jewish Town in Poland. Investigating the Identity and History of an Ultra - Orthodox Society
    Lelov: cultural memory and a Jewish town in Poland. Investigating the identity and history of an ultra - orthodox society. Item Type Thesis Authors Morawska, Lucja Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 03/10/2021 19:09:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/7827 University of Bradford eThesis This thesis is hosted in Bradford Scholars – The University of Bradford Open Access repository. Visit the repository for full metadata or to contact the repository team © University of Bradford. This work is licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence. Lelov: cultural memory and a Jewish town in Poland. Investigating the identity and history of an ultra - orthodox society. Lucja MORAWSKA Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Social and International Studies University of Bradford 2012 i Lucja Morawska Lelov: cultural memory and a Jewish town in Poland. Investigating the identity and history of an ultra - orthodox society. Key words: Chasidism, Jewish History in Eastern Europe, Biederman family, Chasidic pilgrimage, Poland, Lelov Abstract. Lelov, an otherwise quiet village about fifty miles south of Cracow (Poland), is where Rebbe Dovid (David) Biederman founder of the Lelov ultra-orthodox (Chasidic) Jewish group, - is buried.
    [Show full text]