The Ear: Hearing 353 Given Bud, Tight Junctions Link the Apical Ends of Adjacent Cells G Protein-Coupled Receptors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Ear: Hearing 353 Given Bud, Tight Junctions Link the Apical Ends of Adjacent Cells G Protein-Coupled Receptors The Ear: Hearing 353 given bud, tight junctions link the apical ends of adjacent cells G protein-coupled receptors. In the current model for salty together, limiting movement of molecules between the cells. tastes, Na + enters the presynaptic cell through an apical The apical membrane of a taste cell is modified into microvilli channel and depolarizes the taste cell, resulting in exocytosis to increase the amount of surface area in contact with the en­ of the neurotransmitter serotonin. Serotonin in turn excites vironment (Fig. 10-16c). the primary gustatory neuron. For a substance (tastant) to be tasted, it must first dissolve Transduction mechanisms for sour tastes are more contro­ in the saliva and mucus of the mouth. Dissolved taste ligands versial, complicated by the fact that increasing H+, the sour then interact with an apical membrane protein (receptor or taste signal, also changes pH. There is evidence that H+ acts on channel) on a taste cell (Fig. 10-16c). Although the details of ion channels from both extracellular and intracellular sides of signal transduction for the five taste sensations are still contro­ the membrane, and the transduction mechanisms remain un­ versial, interaction of a taste ligand with a membrane protein certain. Ultimately, H+-mediated depolarization of the presyn­ initiates a signal transduction cascade that ends with a series of aptic cell results in serotonin release, as described for salt taste action potentials in the primary sensory neuron. above. The mechanisms of taste transduction are a good example Neurotransmitters (ATP and serotonin) from taste cells ac­ of how our models of physiological function must periodically tivate primary gustatory neurons whose axons run through cra­ be revised as new research data are published. For many years nial nerves VII, IX, and X to the medulla, where they synapse. the widely held view of taste transduction was that an individ­ Sensory information then passes through the thalamus to the ual taste cell could sense more than one taste, with cells differ­ gustatory cortex (see Fig. 10-4). Central processing of sensory ing in their sensitivities. However, gustation research using mo­ information compares the input from multiple taste cells and lecular biology techniques and knockout mice [ ~ jJ 292J interprets the taste sensation based on which populations of currently indicates that each taste cell is sensitive to only one neurons are responding most strongly. Signals from the sensory 10 taste. neurons also initiate behavioral responses, such as feeding, and In the old model, all taste cells formed synapses with pri­ feedforward responses [ ~ fl. 2ll-l-J that activate the digestive mary sensory neurons called gustatory neurons. Now it has system. been shown that there are two different types of taste cells, An interesting psychological aspect of taste is the phe­ and that only the taste cells for salty and sour tastes (type III nomenon named specific hunger. Humans and other animals or presynaptic cells) synapse with gustatory neurons. The that are lacking a particular nutrient may develop a craving for presynaptic taste cells release the neurotransmitter serotonin that substance. Salt appetite, representing a lack of Na+ in the byexocytosis. body, has been recognized for years. Hunters have used their The taste cells for sweet, bitter, and umami sensations knowledge of this specific hunger to stake out salt licks because (type II or receptor cells) do not form traditional synapses. they know that animals will seek them out. Salt appetite is di­ Instead they release ATP through gap junction-like channels, rectly related to Na+ concentration in the body and cannot be and the ATP acts both on sensory neurons and on neighboring assuaged by ingestion of other cations, such as Ca2 + or K+. presynaptic cells. This communication between neighboring Other appetites, such as cravings for chocolate, are more diffi­ taste cells creates complex interactions. cult to relate to specific nutrient needs and probably reflect complex mixtures of physical, psychological, environmental, Taste Transduction Uses Receptors and cultural influences. and Channels The details of taste cell signal transduction, once thought to be CONCEPT CHECK relatively straightforward, are also more complex than scien­ 14. With what essential nutrient is the umami taste sensation as­ tists initially thought (Fig. 10-17 e ). The type II taste cells for sociated? bitter, sweet, and umami tastes express different G protein­ 1S. Map or diagram the neural pathway from a presynaptic taste coupled receptors, including about 30 variants of bitter recep­ cell to the gustatory cortex. Answers p. 383 tors. In type II taste cells, the receptor proteins are associated with a special G protein called gustducin. Gustducin appears to activate multiple signal transduc­ THE EAR: HEARING tion pathways. Some pathways release Ca2 + from intracellular The ear is a sense organ that is specialized for two distinct func­ stores, while others open cation channels and allow Ca 2 + to tions: hearing and equilibrium. It can be divided into external, enter the cell. Calcium signals then initiate ATP release from middle, and inner sections, with the neurological elements the type II taste cells. housed in and protected by structures in the inner ear. The In contrast, salty and sour transduction mechanisms vestibular complex of the inner ear is the primary sensor for both appear to be mediated by ion channels rather than by equilibrium. The remainder of the ear is used for hearing. 354 Chapter 10 Sensory Physiology 0- Sweet, umami, Sour or bitter li gand @ Gustducin 0 1 GPCR /0 Ligands activate the taste cell. Various intracellular pathways are activated. ~) Ca2• signal in the cytoplasm triggers exocytosis or ATP formation . • Serotonin o : - Neurotransmitter or ATP is released. """:-­--­ Primary gustatory --~,. , neurons «) Primary sensory neuron fires and action potentials are sent to the brain. e FIGURE 10-17 Summary of taste transduction. Each taste cell senses only one type of ligand. Receptor cells with G protein-coupled membrane receptors bind either bitter, sweet, or umami ligands and release ATP as a signal molecule. Sodium ion for salt taste enters presynaptic cel ls through ion channels and triggers exocytosis of serotonin. It is unclear whether H+ for sour taste acts intracellularly or extracellularly. The external ear consists of the outer ear, or pinna, and the ing. Colds or other infections that cause swelling can block the ear canal (Fig. 10-18 e ). The pinna is another exampJe of an eustachian tube and result in fluid buildup in the middle ear. If important accessory structure to a sensory system, and it varies bacteria are trapped in the middle ear fluid, the ear infection in shape and location from species to species, depending on known as otitis m edia [oto-, ear + -itis, inflammation + media, the animals' survival needs. The ear canal is sealed at its inter­ middle] results. nal end by a thin membranous sheet of tissue called the Three small bones of the middle ear conduct sound from tympanic membrane, or eardrum. the external environment to the inner ear: the malleus [ham­ The tympanic membrane separates the external ear from mer], the incus [anvil], and the stapes [stirrup]. The three the middle ear, an air-filled cavity that connects with the phar­ bones are connected to one another with the biological equiv­ ynx through the eustachian tube. The eustachian tube is nor­ alent of hinges. One end of the malleus is attached to the tym­ mally collapsed, sealing off the middle ear, but it opens tran­ panic membrane, and the stirrup end of the stapes is attached siently to allow middle ear pressure to eqUilibrate with to a thin membrane that separates the middle ear from the atmospheric pressure during chewing, swallOwing, and yawn­ inner ear. The Ear: Hearing 355 waves, but there is no noise unless someone or something is EME RGING CONCEPTS present to process and perceive the wave energy as sound. Sound is the brain's interpretation of the frequency, ampli­ tude, and duration of sound waves that reach our ears. Our CHANGING TASTE brains translate frequency of sound waves (the number of Sweet receptors respond to sugars, and umami wave peaks that pass a given point each second) into the pitch receptors respond to glutamate, covering two of the of a sound. Low-frequency waves are perceived as low-pitched three major groups of nutritious biomolecules. But sounds, such as the rumble of distant thunder. High-frequency what about fats? For years physiologists thought it waves create high-pitched sounds, such as the screech of finger­ was fat's texture that made it appealing, but now it appears that the tongue may have receptors for nails on a bl ackboard. long-chain fatty acids, such as oleic acid [ ~r lfl ). Sound wave frequency (Fig. 10-19b) is measured in waves Research in rodents has identified a membr·ane re­ per second, or hertz (Hz). The average human ear can hear ceptor called CD36 that lines taste pores and binds sounds over the frequency range of 20-20,000 Hz, with the fats. Activation of the receptor helps trigger the most acute hearing between 1000-3000 Hz. Our hearing is not feedforward digestive reflexes that prepare the as acute as that of many other animals, just as our sense of digestive system for a meal. Cur-rently evidence is smell is less acute. Bats listen for ultra-high-frequency sound lacking for a similar receptor in humans, but "fatty" waves (in the kilohertz range) that bounce off objects in the may turn out to be a sixth taste sensation. dark. Elephants and some birds can hear sounds in the infra­ And what would you say to the idea of taste sound (very low frequency) range. buds in your gut? Scientists have known for years Loudness is our interpretation of sound intensity and is that the stomach and intestines have the ability to influenced by the sensitivity of an individual's ear.
Recommended publications
  • Sound and the Ear Chapter 2
    © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Chapter© Jones & Bartlett 2 Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Sound and the Ear © Jones Karen &J. Kushla,Bartlett ScD, Learning, CCC-A, FAAA LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC Lecturer NOT School FOR of SALE Communication OR DISTRIBUTION Disorders and Deafness NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Kean University © Jones & Bartlett Key Learning, Terms LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR Acceleration DISTRIBUTION Incus NOT FOR SALE OR Saccule DISTRIBUTION Acoustics Inertia Scala media Auditory labyrinth Inner hair cells Scala tympani Basilar membrane Linear scale Scala vestibuli Bel Logarithmic scale Semicircular canals Boyle’s law Malleus Sensorineural hearing loss Broca’s area © Jones & Bartlett Mass Learning, LLC Simple harmonic© Jones motion (SHM) & Bartlett Learning, LLC Brownian motion Membranous labyrinth Sound Cochlea NOT FOR SALE OR Mixed DISTRIBUTION hearing loss Stapedius muscleNOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Compression Organ of Corti Stapes Condensation Osseous labyrinth Tectorial membrane Conductive hearing loss Ossicular chain Tensor tympani muscle Decibel (dB) Ossicles Tonotopic organization © Jones Decibel & hearing Bartlett level (dB Learning, HL) LLC Outer ear © Jones Transducer & Bartlett Learning, LLC Decibel sensation level (dB SL) Outer hair cells Traveling wave theory NOT Decibel FOR sound SALE pressure OR level DISTRIBUTION
    [Show full text]
  • The Standing Acoustic Wave Principle Within the Frequency Analysis Of
    inee Eng ring al & ic d M e e d Misun, J Biomed Eng Med Devic 2016, 1:3 m i o c i a B l D f o e v DOI: 10.4172/2475-7586.1000116 l i a c n e r s u o Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Devices J ISSN: 2475-7586 Review Article Open Access The Standing Acoustic Wave Principle within the Frequency Analysis of Acoustic Signals in the Cochlea Vojtech Misun* Department of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic Abstract The organ of hearing is responsible for the correct frequency analysis of auditory perceptions coming from the outer environment. The article deals with the principles of the analysis of auditory perceptions in the cochlea only, i.e., from the overall signal leaving the oval window to its decomposition realized by the basilar membrane. The paper presents two different methods with the function of the cochlea considered as a frequency analyzer of perceived acoustic signals. First, there is an analysis of the principle that cochlear function involves acoustic waves travelling along the basilar membrane; this concept is one that prevails in the contemporary specialist literature. Then, a new principle with the working name “the principle of standing acoustic waves in the common cavity of the scala vestibuli and scala tympani” is presented and defined in depth. According to this principle, individual structural modes of the basilar membrane are excited by continuous standing waves of acoustic pressure in the scale tympani. Keywords: Cochlea function; Acoustic signals; Frequency analysis; The following is a description of the theories in question: Travelling wave principle; Standing wave principle 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Frequency Noise: a Biophysical Phenomenon M
    PSC REF#:288480 Public Service Commission of Wisconsin RECEIVED: 07/08/16, 8:46:12 AM Congres Geluid, Trillingen, Luchtkwaliteit en Gebied & Gebouw 2012 Low-frequency noise: a biophysical phenomenon M. Oud (medical physicist / consultant)* * [email protected], http://nl.linkedin.com/in/mireilleoud, the Netherlands Abstract Complaints on low-frequency noise were till recently fairly unexplained, but audiological research shed light on the mechanisms that enable perception of frequencies below the threshold of average normal hearing. It was shown that exposure to low-frequency sound may alter the inner ear. This results in an increase of sensitivity to low-frequency sounds, and as a result, previously imperceptible sounds becomes audible to the exposed person. Interactions between inner-ear responses to low and higher frequencies furthermore account for perception of low-frequency sound, as well as the property of the hearing system to perceive so-called difference tones. Introduction A growing minority of people experiences an increased sensitivity for low-frequency sound. Not surprisingly, they complain about noise, even about loud noise in some cases. Their complaints about the presence of hum, buzz, and rumble are often not recognized as a nuisance, since the majority of people does not perceive the very low frequencies. Low-frequency noise (LFN) may have serious health effects like vertigo, disturbed sleep, stress, hypertension, and heart rhythm disorders [1]. The number of sufferers is growing, and this has two possible causes. The sources of low- frequency sounds increased in volume and dimension over the past decades, and auditory sensitisation takes years to develop. Nowadays, the main source of low-frequency noise is the public infrastructure: wind turbines, gas transmission grid, industrial plants, road and railway traffic, sewerage, and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • CONGENITAL MALFORMATIONS of the INNER EAR Malformaciones Congénitas Del Oído Interno
    topic review CONGENITAL MALFORMATIONS OF THE INNER EAR Malformaciones congénitas del oído interno. Revisión de tema Laura Vanessa Ramírez Pedroza1 Hernán Darío Cano Riaño2 Federico Guillermo Lubinus Badillo2 Summary Key words (MeSH) There are a great variety of congenital malformations that can affect the inner ear, Ear with a diversity of physiopathologies, involved altered structures and age of symptom Ear, inner onset. Therefore, it is important to know and identify these alterations opportunely Hearing loss Vestibule, labyrinth to lower the risks of all the complications, being of great importance, among others, Cochlea the alterations in language development and social interactions. Magnetic resonance imaging Resumen Existe una gran variedad de malformaciones congénitas que pueden afectar al Palabras clave (DeCS) oído interno, con distintas fisiopatologías, diferentes estructuras alteradas y edad Oído de aparición de los síntomas. Por lo anterior, es necesario conocer e identificar Oído interno dichas alteraciones, con el fin de actuar oportunamente y reducir el riesgo de las Pérdida auditiva Vestíbulo del laberinto complicaciones, entre otras —de gran importancia— las alteraciones en el área del Cóclea lenguaje y en el ámbito social. Imagen por resonancia magnética 1. Epidemiology • Hyperbilirubinemia Ear malformations occur in 1 in 10,000 or 20,000 • Respiratory distress from meconium aspiration cases (1). One in every 1,000 children has some degree • Craniofacial alterations (3) of sensorineural hearing impairment, with an average • Mechanical ventilation for more than five days age at diagnosis of 4.9 years. The prevalence of hearing • TORCH Syndrome (4) impairment in newborns with risk factors has been determined to be 9.52% (2).
    [Show full text]
  • ANATOMY of EAR Basic Ear Anatomy
    ANATOMY OF EAR Basic Ear Anatomy • Expected outcomes • To understand the hearing mechanism • To be able to identify the structures of the ear Development of Ear 1. Pinna develops from 1st & 2nd Branchial arch (Hillocks of His). Starts at 6 Weeks & is complete by 20 weeks. 2. E.A.M. develops from dorsal end of 1st branchial arch starting at 6-8 weeks and is complete by 28 weeks. 3. Middle Ear development —Malleus & Incus develop between 6-8 weeks from 1st & 2nd branchial arch. Branchial arches & Development of Ear Dev. contd---- • T.M at 28 weeks from all 3 germinal layers . • Foot plate of stapes develops from otic capsule b/w 6- 8 weeks. • Inner ear develops from otic capsule starting at 5 weeks & is complete by 25 weeks. • Development of external/middle/inner ear is independent of each other. Development of ear External Ear • It consists of - Pinna and External auditory meatus. Pinna • It is made up of fibro elastic cartilage covered by skin and connected to the surrounding parts by ligaments and muscles. • Various landmarks on the pinna are helix, antihelix, lobule, tragus, concha, scaphoid fossa and triangular fossa • Pinna has two surfaces i.e. medial or cranial surface and a lateral surface . • Cymba concha lies between crus helix and crus antihelix. It is an important landmark for mastoid antrum. Anatomy of external ear • Landmarks of pinna Anatomy of external ear • Bat-Ear is the most common congenital anomaly of pinna in which antihelix has not developed and excessive conchal cartilage is present. • Corrections of Pinna defects are done at 6 years of age.
    [Show full text]
  • Organum Vestibulocochleare INTERNAL EAR MIDDLE EAR EXTERNAL EAR PETROSAL BONE- Eq EXTERNAL EAR AURICLE
    EAR organum vestibulocochleare INTERNAL EAR MIDDLE EAR EXTERNAL EAR PETROSAL BONE- Eq EXTERNAL EAR AURICLE The external ear plays the role of an acoustic antenna: auricle the auricle (together with the head) collects and focuses sound waves, the ear canal act as a resonator. tympanic membrane anular cartilage meatus acusticus externus EXTERNAL EAR EXTERNAL EAR AURICLE scutiform cartilage Auricular muscles: -Dorsal -Ventral -Rostral -Caudal EXTERNAL EAR MEATUS ACUSTICUS EXTERNUS auricular cartilage vertical canal auditory ossicles horizontal cochlea canal auditory tube tympanic tympanic eardrum bulla cavity tympanic membrane MIDDLE EAR Auditory ossicles STAPES INCUS Tympanic cavity: (anvil) (stirrup) - epitympanium - mesotympanium - hypotympanium MALLEUS (hammer) auditory vestibular window- ossicles or oval window through which mechanical stimuli (transmitted by the auditory ossicles) enter the epitympanic internal ear for translation recess into nerve impulses auditory tube (Eustachian tube) cochlear window- or round window tympanic cavity bulla tympanica through which the vibration of the perilympha is absorbed MIDDLE EAR MIDDLE EAR GUTTURAL POUCH- Eq MIDDLE EAR AUDITORY OSSICLES head INCUS processus rostralis (stirrup) STAPES processus muscularis (anvil) manubrium short crus body MALLEUS (hammer) Two muscles of the ossicles: long crus m. tensor tympani- n. tensoris tympani ex. n. base mandibularis (footplate) m. stapedius- n. stapedius ex. n. facialis crus The muscles fix the bones and protect the cochlea crus against the harmful effects
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Cochlear Shape on Low-Frequency Hearing
    The influence of cochlear shape on low-frequency hearing Daphne Manoussaki*†, Richard S. Chadwick‡§, Darlene R. Ketten‡¶ʈ, Julie Arrudaʈ**, Emilios K. Dimitriadis††, and Jen T. O’Malley** *Department of Mathematics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240; †Department of Sciences, Technical University of Crete, Hania, Greece 73100; ‡Auditory Mechanics Section, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, and ††Laboratory of Bioengineering and Physical Science, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; ¶Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114; ʈWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543; and **Massachusetts Ear and Eye Infirmary, Boston, MA 02114 Edited by Jon H. Kaas, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, and approved February 13, 2008 (received for review October 22, 2007) The conventional theory about the snail shell shape of the mam- radius of curvature at the apex as a single, simple measure of malian cochlea is that it evolved essentially and perhaps solely to curvature change (and thus, energy redistribution), and show conserve space inside the skull. Recently, a theory proposed that that it is a robust correlate of LF hearing limits for both land and the spiral‘s graded curvature enhances the cochlea’s mechanical aquatic mammals. Contrary to the existing literature that has response to low frequencies. This article provides a multispecies suggested that material properties and geometry local to the LF analysis of cochlear shape to test this theory and demonstrates region control the LF limit (10, 11), we suggest that this measure that the ratio of the radii of curvature from the outermost and of curvature change of the entire cochlea affects the LF limit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Special Senses the Ear External Ear Middle
    1/24/2016 The Ear • The organ of hearing and equilibrium – Cranial nerve VIII - Vestibulocochlear – Regions The Special Senses • External ear • Middle ear Hearing and • Internal ear (labyrinth) Equilibrium External Ear Middle Internal ear • Two parts External ear (labyrinth) ear – Pinna or auricle (external structures) – External auditory meatus (car canal) Auricle • Site of cerumen (earwax) production (pinna) – Waterproofing, protection • Separated from the middle ear by the tympanic membrane Helix (eardrum) – Vibrates in response to sound waves Lobule External acoustic Tympanic Pharyngotympanic meatus membrane (auditory) tube (a) The three regions of the ear Figure 15.25a Middle Ear Epitympanic Middle Ear Superior Malleus Incus recess Lateral • Tympanic cavity Anterior – Air-filled chamber – Openings View • Tympanic membrane – covers opening to outer ear • Round and oval windows – openings to inner ear • Epitympanic recess – dead-end cavity into temporal bone of unknown function • Auditory tube – AKA Eustachian tube or pharyngotympanic tube Pharyngotym- panic tube Tensor Tympanic Stapes Stapedius tympani membrane muscle muscle (medial view) Figure 15.26 1 1/24/2016 Middle Ear Middle Ear • Auditory tube (Eustachian tube) • Otitis Media – Connects the middle ear to the nasopharynx • Equalizes pressure – Opens during swallowing and yawning Middle Ear Middle Ear • Contains auditory ossicles (bones) • Sound waves cause tympanic membrane to vibrate – Malleus • Ossicles help transmit vibrations into the inner ear – Incus – Reduce the area
    [Show full text]
  • Turbulence Around the Otoliths Sappey's Hostility and Br
    B-ENT, 2006, 2, 99-102 A Historical Vignette “Be proud of yourself: you have a History!” Turbulence around the otoliths Sappey’s hostility and Breschet’s defence J. Tainmont W. Churchill Avenue 172, 1180 Brussels, Belgium Key-words. Vestibular apparatus; otoliths; Breschet; Sappey; history of otology Abstract. Turbulence around the otoliths. Sappey’s hostility and Breschet’s defence. Nowadays, the animosity between medical scholars is seldom apparent. However, during the XIXth century it was not necessarily so. We find an example of this in Sappey’s hostility against his colleague anatomist Gilbert Breschet. It concerned the discovery of the otoliths of the inner ear that Breschet attributed to himself. We present here Breschet’s defence. Sappey’s hostility (Figure 1) Marie-Philibert-Constant Sappey was a French anatomist who received from the 1900 Larousse Encyclopaedia the honour of an article with a pen-and-ink draw- ing. He was born at Bourg (Ain department) in 1810 and he died in Paris in 1896. He published important works concerning the lymphatic vessels. He described their anatomy, physiology, pathol- ogy and iconography. We owe him the knowledge of the lymphatic vessels and nodes of the supra- glottic part of the larynx (1889) AB that was the basis of the radical neck dissection for laryngeal can- Figure 1 cer. Nevertheless, Sappey was also A. Sappey (1810-1896). B. Lymphatic vessels of head and neck with the great lymphatic vein1. an irascible man! In his treatise on descriptive anatomy (1845-1863), in the chapter “sense of hearing”, we find a history of the discovery “After the work of Scarpa, was very simple, to mention it was of the membranous labyrinth into Breschet’s one appeared… In that enough.
    [Show full text]
  • The Special Senses
    HOMEWORK DUE IN LAB 5 HW page 9: Matching Eye Disorders PreLab 5 THE SPECIAL SENSES Hearing and Equilibrium THE EAR The organ of hearing and equilibrium . Cranial nerve VIII - Vestibulocochlear . Regions . External ear . Middle ear . Internal ear (labyrinth) Middle Internal ear External ear (labyrinth) ear Auricle (pinna) Helix Lobule External acoustic Tympanic Pharyngotympanic meatus membrane (auditory) tube (a) The three regions of the ear Figure 15.25a Middle Ear Epitympanic Superior Malleus Incus recess Lateral Anterior View Pharyngotym- panic tube Tensor Tympanic Stapes Stapedius tympani membrane muscle muscle (medial view) Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 15.26 MIDDLE EAR Auditory tube . Connects the middle ear to the nasopharynx . Equalizes pressure . Opens during swallowing and yawning . Otitis media INNER EAR Contains functional organs for hearing & equilibrium . Bony labyrinth . Membranous labyrinth Superior vestibular ganglion Inferior vestibular ganglion Temporal bone Semicircular ducts in Facial nerve semicircular canals Vestibular nerve Anterior Posterior Lateral Cochlear Cristae ampullares nerve in the membranous Maculae ampullae Spiral organ Utricle in (of Corti) vestibule Cochlear duct Saccule in in cochlea vestibule Stapes in Round oval window window Figure 15.27 INNER EAR - BONY LABYRINTH Three distinct regions . Vestibule . Gravity . Head position . Linear acceleration and deceleration . Semicircular canals . Angular acceleration and deceleration . Cochlea . Vibration Superior vestibular ganglion Inferior vestibular ganglion Temporal bone Semicircular ducts in Facial nerve semicircular canals Vestibular nerve Anterior Posterior Lateral Cochlear Cristae ampullares nerve in the membranous Maculae ampullae Spiral organ Utricle in (of Corti) vestibule Cochlear duct Saccule in in cochlea vestibule Stapes in Round oval window window Figure 15.27 INNER EAR The cochlea .
    [Show full text]
  • Tympanic Membrane (Membrana Tympanica, Myrinx)
    Auditory and vestibular system Auris, is = Us, oton Auditory and vestibular system • external ear (auris externa) • middle ear (auris media) • internal ear (auris interna) = organum vestibulo- cochleare External ear (Auris externa) • auricle (auricula, pinna) – elastic cartilage • external acoustic meatus (meatus acusticus externus) • tympanic membrane (membrana tympanica, myrinx) • helix Auricle – crus, spina, cauda – (tuberculum auriculare Darwini, apex auriculae) • antihelix – crura, fossa triangularis • scapha • concha auriculae – cymba, cavitas • tragus • antitragus • incisura intertragica • lobulus auriculae posterior surface = negative image of the anterior one ligaments: lig. auriculare ant., sup., post. muscles – innervation: n. facialis • extrinsic muscles = facial muscles – mm. auriculares (ant., sup., post.) – m. temporoparietalis • intrinsic muscles: rudimentary – m. tragicus + antitragicus – m. helicis major+minor – m. obliquus + transversus auriculae, m. pyramidalis auriculae cartilage: cartilago auriculae - elastic skin: dorsally more loosen, ventrally firmly fixed to perichondrium - othematoma Auricle – supply • arteries: a. temporalis superficialis → rr. auriculares ant. a. carotis externa → a. auricularis post. • veins: v. jugularis ext. • lymph: nn.ll. parotidei, mastoidei • nerves: sensory – nn. auriculares ant. from n. auriculotemporalis (ventrocranial 2/3) – r. auricularis n. X. (concha) – n. occipitalis minor (dosrocranial) – n. auricularis magnus (cudal) motor: n. VII. External acoustic meatus (meatus acusticus
    [Show full text]
  • 16.400 Human Factors Engineering, Lecture 6 Notes
    Spatial Disorientation 16.400/16.453 Human Factors Engineering Prof. L. Young Sept. 2011 1 SPATIAL DISORIENTATION IN FLIGHT Formal Definition “[A failure] to sense correctly the position, motion or attitude of his aircraft or of himself [herself] within the fixed coordinate system provided by the surface of the earth and the gravitational vertical. In addition, errors in perception by the aviator of his position, motion or attitude with respect to his aircraft, or of his own aircraft relative to other aircraft, may also be embraced within a broader definition of spatial disorientation in flight. -- Alan Benson (1978) 2 SPATIAL DISORIENTATION IN FLIGHT Spatial Disorientation Types TYPE I -- Unrecognized • Pilot Does Not Consciously Perceive Any Manifestation of Spatial Disorientation • Most Often Occurs When Pilot Breaks Instrument Cross-Check • Most Likely to Lead to Controlled Flight Into Terrain 3 SPATIAL DISORIENTATION IN FLIGHT Spatial Disorientation Types TYPE II -- Recognized • Pilot Consciously Perceives A Manifestation of Spatial Disorientation but May Not Attribute It to SD Itself • Conflict between “Natural” and “Synthetic” SD Percepts May Occur • Instrument Malfunction Is Often Suspected 4 SPATIAL DISORIENTATION IN FLIGHT Spatial Disorientation Types TYPE III -- Incapacitating • Experienced by 10-15% of Aviators • Vestibulo-Ocular Disorganization (i.e., uncontrollable nystagmus) • Motor Conflict (e.g., “Giant Hand”) • Temporal Distortion • Dissociation (“Break-Off”) 5 SPATIAL DISORIENTATION IN FLIGHT Predisposing Perceptual
    [Show full text]