AZERBAIJAN Contribution to a RES 75 187
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Interim Report of the Government of the Republic of Azerbaijan on The
Interim Report of the Government of the Republic of Azerbaijan on the implementation of the recommendations by the Working Group of the UN Human Rights Council on the Universal Periodic Review with respect to the first report of the Republic of Azerbaijan 1. Address shortcomings in the area of human rights promotion and protection, including promotion of a culture of human rights among the society, strengthening of national capacities, the rule of law and adequate protection of vulnerable segments of the population (Iran); Issues indicated in the recommendation are one of the main duties of the Government of the Republic of Azerbaijan and is always being carried out. Protection of human rights and freedoms was defined as the highest goal of the State in the Constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan. In order to ensure the sustainability of the “Baku process of intercultural dialogue” initiated during the conference of the CoE Ministers of Culture held in Baku on December 2-3, 2008 the VI Conference of the Ministers of Culture of the OIC Member States was held in Baku on October 13-15, 2009. The first day of the conference, a round table on the topic “Baku process: a new call for a dialogue among civilizations” was arranged between a number of European states and the OIC member states by mediation of ISESCO and the Council of Europe, by the initiative of the Government of the Republic of Azerbaijan. The participants of the round table adopted a final communiqué at the end. The issues of cooperation at bilateral, regional and international levels, exchange of experience, development of intercultural dialogue between the Islamic world and Europe, implementation of projects and programs in this field, as well as joint measures regarding the protection of cultural heritage in conflict regions were indicated in the communiqué. -
Developing Cultural and Creative Industries in Azerbaijan
DEVELOPING CULTURAL AND CREATIVE INDUSTRIES IN AZERBAIJAN Cristina Farinha The Programme is funded The Programme is implemented by a consortium led by the British Council, in partnership with the Soros Foundation by the European Union Moldova, the National Center for Culture of Poland and the Goethe-Institut The report is developed with the assistance of the EU-Eastern Partnership Culture and Creativity Programme. The content of this report does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed in the report lies entirely with the author. The report was published in January 2018. 2 CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary 4 Team and Acknowledgements 8 2. Creative Industries in the EU 9 3. Mandate and Methodology 11 4. Developing Cultural and Creative Industries – Regional Analysis and Detailed View on Azerbaijan 14 4.1 Brief analysis of the national context 14 4.2 Recognising CCIs’ transversal character 16 4.3 Setting up participatory policies and platforms 21 4.4 Building on emerging creative hubs 23 4.5 Easing access to specific funding and support 26 4.6 Improving creative entrepreneurial education and skills 27 4.7 Developing audiences and markets 32 4.8 Encouraging internationalisation and cooperation 35 5. Recommendations on Developing Cultural and Creative Industries in Azerbaijan 37 5.1 Policy-making, Participation and Platforms. 41 5.2 Infra-structure, Funding and Frameworks 43 5.3 Skills, Audiences and Markets 45 5.4 Internationalisation and Cooperation 46 Appendix A: Bibliography 49 Appendix B: List of Participants in Workshops, Interviews and Site Visits 51 3 1. -
Azerbaijan Pharmaceutical Country Profile
Azerbaijan PHARMACEUTICAL COUNTRY PROFILE Azerbaijan Pharmaceutical Country Profile Published by the Ministry of Health in collaboration with the World Health Organization 12/05/2011 Any part of this document may be freely reviewed, quoted, reproduced, or translated in full or in part, provided that the source is acknowledged. It may not be sold, or used in conjunction with commercial purposes or for profit. This document was produced with the support of the World Health Organization (WHO) Azerbaijan Country Office, and all reasonable precautions have been taken to verify the information contained herein. The published material does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization, and is being distributed without any warranty of any kind – either expressed or implied. The responsibility for interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. ii Foreword The 2011 Pharmaceutical Country Profile for Azerbaijan has been produced by the Ministry of Health, in collaboration with the World Health Organization. This document contains information on existing socio-economic and health- related conditions, resources; as well as on regulatory structures, processes and outcomes relating to the pharmaceutical sector in Azerbaijan. The compiled data comes from international sources (e.g. the World Health Statistics1,2), surveys conducted in the previous years and country level information collected in 2011. The sources of data for each piece of information are presented in the tables that can be found at the end of this document. On the behalf of the Ministry of Azerbaijan, I wish to express my appreciation to WHO Country Office in Azerbaijan for its contribution to the process of data collection and the development of this profile. -
General Assembly Distr.: General 23 July 2019
United Nations A/74/212 General Assembly Distr.: General 23 July 2019 Original: English Seventy-fourth session Item 72 (b) of the provisional agenda* Promotion and protection of human rights: human rights questions, including alternative approaches for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms Human rights and cultural diversity Report of the Secretary-General Summary The present report is submitted pursuant to paragraph 24 of General Assembly resolution 72/170, in which the Assembly requested the Secretary-General to prepare a report on the implementation of the resolution, including efforts undertaken at the national, regional and international levels regarding the recognition and importance of cultural diversity, and taking into account the views of Member States, relevant United Nations agencies and non-governmental organizations. Following the General Assembly’s request, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights invited States, United Nations agencies and non-governmental organizations to submit written information on efforts undertaken in that regard, and the present report provides a summary of the submissions received. The submissions from Governments focus on measures taken within the State to promote cultural diversity and to protect and ensure access to cultural heritage. * A/74/150. 19-12549 (E) 080819 *1912549* A/74/212 I. Introduction 1. The present report is submitted pursuant to paragraph 24 of General Assembly resolution 72/170 on human rights and cultural diversity, in which the Assembly requested the Secretary-General to prepare a report on the implementation of the resolution, including efforts undertaken at the national, regional and international levels regarding the recognition and importance of cultural diversity, and taking into account the views of Member States, relevant United Nations agencies and non-governmental organizations The Assembly also requested the Secretary-General to submit the report to it at its seventy-fourth session. -
Climate Change and Security in the South Caucasus
CLIMATE CHANGE AND SECURITY IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA, REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN AND GEORGIA Regional Assessment ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PROJECT CO-ORDINATION Within the framework of the project Climate Change and Security in Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the Southern Caucasus under the Christine Kitzler, Dana Bogdan (OSCE) Environment and Security Initiative (ENVSEC), one of the four main activities aimed at identifying and mapping climate change and security risks in Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the South Caucasus in a participatory way, the conclusions of which are presented in the current report for the South Caucasus. ASSESSMENT CO-ORDINATION Harald Egerer, Pier Carlo Sandei, Filippo Montalbetti (UN Environment), Valentin Yemelin (GRID-Arendal) The Austrian Development Agency (ADA) has co-funded the project by providing financial resources for the project activities in the pilot region in the Dniester River Basin. Moreover, the ENVSEC initiative partners the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UN Environment, the United Nations Economic Commission for LEAD AUTHOR Europe (UNECE) and the Regional Environmental Centre for Central and Eastern Europe (REC) contributed their own resources to the Ieva Rucevska (GRID-Arendal) implementation of this project. CONTRIBUTORS AND REVIEWERS Nino Malashkhia (OSCE) Trine Kirkfeldt, Hanne Jørstad, Valentin Yemelin (GRID-Arnedal) Mahir Aliyev (UN Environment) Zsolt Lengyel (Climate East Policy) The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the ENVSEC partner organizations, their donors or the participating States. Participants in the national consultations that took place in the Republic of Armenia (Yerevan, 12 May 2014), the Republic of Azerbaijan (Baku, 30 May 2014) and in Georgia (Tbilisi, 8 May 2014) commented and contributed to the regional assessment. -
Concept Note WORLD FORUM for INTERCULTURAL
Concept note WORLD FORUM for INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE 7-9 April, 2011 Baku, Republic of Azerbaijan Based on the global agenda on the Dialogue among Civilisations adopted by the United Nations General Assembly (November 2001), the UNESCO Convention on Protection and Promotion oF the Diversity oF Cultural Expressions (2005), the Islamic Declaration on Cultural Diversity, which was issued by ISESCO in 2004, Declaration and Action Plan of the Third Summit of the Heads of State and Government of the Council of Europe member states, the Council of Europe White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue (May 2008), Baku Declaration For the Promotion oF Intercultural Dialogue Government oF Azerbaijan initiated to host the World Forum for Intercultural Dialogue on 7-9 April, 2011 in Baku under patronage of H.E. Mr. Ilham Aliyev, the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan in the Framework oF the Baku process launched at the Conference of Ministers responsible For Culture in Europe and its neighbouring regions (December, 2008). The aim of the “Baku process” is to establish a platForm in which today’s challenges can be discussed in the spirit oF intercultural dialogue and universal values. Why in Azerbaijan? Azerbaijan is one oF the unique places where diFFerent cultures and civilizations meet at the crossroad between the East and the West, the North and the South. At the same time, being a member of both Islamic and European organizations Azerbaijan absorbs the values of both civilizations, thus enabling it to assume a role of genuine bridge. This is not casual -
Baku Dialoguesbaku Dialogues Policy Perspectives on the Silk Road Region
BAKU DIALOGUESBAKU DIALOGUES POLICY PERSPECTIVES ON THE SILK ROAD REGION Vol. 4 | No. 1 | Fall 2020 Silk Road Region as Global Keystone? Geopolitics & Connectivity in the Heart of the World Between Eurasia and the Middle East Geopolitical Keystone Svante Cornell Nikolas K. Gvosdev Against ‘the Blob’ Not A Top European Priority Michael A. Reynolds Amanda Paul Five-Star Hubs Eurasia, the Hegemon, and the Three Sovereigns Taleh Ziyadov Pepe Escobar Silk Road Pathways Completing the Southern Gas Corridor Yu Hongjun Akhmed Gumbatov Taking Stock of Regional Quandaries The Karabakh Peace Process Dennis Sammut Iran’s Longstanding Cooperation with Armenia Brenda Shaffer The OSCE and Minorities in the Silk Road Region Lamberto Zannier Profile in Leadership Zbigniew Brzezinski: My Friendship with America’s Geopolitical Sage Hafiz Pashayev Baku Dialogues Interview Strategic Equilibrium: Azerbaijan’s Foreign Policy Hikmat Hajiyev 1 Vol. 4 | No. 1 | Fall 2020 ISSN Print: 2709-1848 ISSN Online: 2709-1856 BAKU DIALOGUES BAKU DIALOGUESBAKU DIALOGUES POLICY PERSPECTIVES ON THE SILK ROAD REGION Vol. 4 | No. 1 | Fall 2020 Silk Road Region as Global Keystone? Geopolitics & Connectivity in the Heart of the World Between Eurasia and the Middle East Geopolitical Keystone Svante Cornell Nikolas K. Gvosdev Against ‘the Blob’ Not A Top European Priority Michael A. Reynolds Amanda Paul Five-Star Hubs Eurasia, the Hegemon, and the Three Sovereigns Taleh Ziyadov Pepe Escobar Silk Road Pathways Completing the Southern Gas Corridor Yu Hongjun Akhmed Gumbatov Taking Stock of Regional Quandaries The Karabakh Peace Process Dennis Sammut Iran’s Longstanding Cooperation with Armenia Brenda Shaffer The OSCE and Minorities in the Silk Road Region Lamberto Zannier Profile in Leadership Zbigniew Brzezinski: My Friendship with America’s Geopolitical Sage Hafiz Pashayev Baku Dialogues Interview Strategic Equilibrium: Azerbaijan’s Foreign Policy Hikmat Hajiyev Vol. -
Internal Displacement Global Overview of Trends and Developments in 2010 Internally Displaced People Worldwide December 2010
Internal Displacement Global Overview of Trends and Developments in 2010 Internally displaced people worldwide December 2010 Turkey FYR Macedonia 954,000– Russian Federation Armenia Azerbaijan Uzbekistan Turkmenistan 650 1,201,000 6,500–78,000 At least 8,000 Up to About 3,400 Undetermined 593,000 Serbia Kyrgyzstan About About 75,000 225,000 Georgia Kosovo Up to Afghanistan 18,300 258,000 At least 352,000 Croatia 2,300 Bosnia and Herzegovina 113,400 Cyprus Pakistan Up to 208,000 At least 980,000 Israel Nepal Undetermined About 50,000 Occupied Palestinian Territory At least 160,000 India At least 650,000 Algeria Undetermined Chad Bangladesh 171,000 Undetermined Iraq Senegal 2,800,000 Laos 10,000–40,000 Undetermined Mexico Syria Sri Lanka About 120,000 Liberia At least At least Undetermined 327,000 The Philippines 433,000 At least 15,000 Côte d´Ivoire Lebanon Undetermined At least 76,000 Guatemala Togo Yemen Myanmar Undetermined Undetermined About 250,000 At least 446,000 Eritrea Indonesia Niger About 10,000 About 200,000 Timor-Leste Colombia Undetermined Undetermined 3,600,000–5,200,000 Ethiopia Nigeria About Undetermined CAR 300,000 192,000 Peru Sudan Somalia About 150,000 4,500,000– Republic of About 1,500,000 5,200,000 the Congo Kenya Up to 7,800 About 250,000 DRC Uganda About At least 166,000 1,700,000 Rwanda Undetermined Angola Burundi Undetermined Up to 100,000 Zimbabwe 570,000–1,000,000 Internal Displacement Global Overview of Trends and Developments in 2010 March 2011 Children at the displace- ment camp of Karehe. -
The European Union's Offer to Its Eastern Neighbours
Materials published here have a working paper character. They can be subject to further publi- cation. The views and opinions expressed here reflect the author(s) point of view and not neces- sarily those of CASE Network. This work has been prepared within the framework of the ENEPO project (EU Eastern Neighbourhood: Economic Potential and Future Development), financed within the Sixth Frame- work Programme of the European Commission. Keywords: ENP, CIS countries, EU Jel codes: P36, P45, P48, P51, P52 © CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research, Warsaw, 2008 Graphic Design: Agnieszka Natalia Bury EAN 9788371784637 Publisher: CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research on behalf of CASE Network 12 Sienkiewicza, 00-010 Warsaw, Poland tel.: (48 22) 622 66 27, 828 61 33, fax: (48 22) 828 60 69 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.case-research.eu CIS COUNTRIES’ INTERESTS VIS-À-VIS THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS EASTERN POLICY Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Part I: The CIS States’ Interests in Relation to the European Union ................................................ 7 I.1. The CIS countries’ position in relation to the EU.................................................................. 7 I.2. The political interests of the CIS states in relation to the EU ............................................. 11 I.3. Economic interests............................................................................................................ -
BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report 2010
BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report 2010 www.bp.com/caspian/sr 2 Introduction by the president of the BP Azerbaijan-Georgia-Turkey region 3 This is BP in Azerbaijan / 17 How we operate / 29 Safety and health / 35 Environment / 43 Society 52 Five-year performance data / 53 EITI reported data / 55 Report process and feedback Scope of report The scope of this report covers the calendar year ending 31 December 2010. All dollar amounts are in US dollars. Unless otherwise specified, the text does not distinguish between the operations and activities of BP p.l.c. and those of its subsidiaries and affiliates. References in this report to ‘us’, ‘we’ and ‘our’ relate to BP in Azerbaijan unless otherwise stated. In this report when we refer to BP in Azerbaijan we refer to our operations in Azerbaijan only. If we refer to BP AGT we are referring to our activities in Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey. Specific references to ‘BP’ and the ‘BP group’ mean BP p.l.c., its subsidiaries and affiliates. Front cover image Challenge drilling engineer Aysel Javadova at Deepwater Gunashli platform Cautionary statement The BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report 2010 contains certain forward-looking statements relating, in particular, to recoverable volumes and resources, capital, operating and other expenditures, and future projects. Actual results may differ from those expressed in such statements depending on a variety of factors including supply and demand developments, pricing and operational issues and political, legal, fiscal, commercial and social circumstances. Group sustainability reporting bp.com/sustainability What’s inside? The 2010 BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report covers our business 2 Introduction by the president of the BP performance, environmental record and wider role in Azerbaijan Azerbaijan-Georgia- during 2010. -
Statement by Mr. Tofig Musayev Deputy Permanent Representative of the Republic of Azerbaijan to the United Nations at the Plen
Azərbaycan Respublikasının Permanent Mission of the BMT yanında Daimi Republic of Azerbaijan Nümayəndəliyi to the United Nations 633 Third Avenue, Suite 3210, New York, NY, 10017 Tel: (212) 371-2559, 371-2832 (ext. 101); Fax: (212) 371-2784, (646) 738-6143 Statement by Mr. Tofig Musayev Deputy Permanent Representative of the Republic of Azerbaijan to the United Nations at the plenary meeting of the seventy-fifth session of the United Nations General Assembly on agenda item 15 “Culture of peace” 2 December 2020 Mr. President, As the Declaration on a Culture of Peace proclaims, a culture of peace is a set of values, attitudes, traditions and modes of behaviour and ways of life based on, inter alia, full respect for the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of States, commitment to peaceful settlement of disputes, promotion of all human rights and fundamental freedoms and compliance with international obligations under the Charter of the United Nations and international law. The very fact that the General Assembly has adopted a growing number of resolutions under the agenda item “Culture of peace” with the overwhelming support of Member States attests to the primacy and urgency given by the international community to the topic. The annual resolutions entitled “Follow-up to the Declaration and Programme of Action on a Culture of Peace” and “Promotion of interreligious and intercultural dialogue, understanding and cooperation for peace” continue to serve as universal standard-setting and guidance in this area of activities and cooperation. Taking this opportunity, I would like to thank the delegation of Bangladesh and the delegations Pakistan and the Philippines, respectively, for presenting the relevant draft resolutions this year (A/75/L.28 and A/75/L.36/Add.1) and for their strong commitment to the promotion of interreligious and intercultural dialogue. -
75Th Session of the United Nations General Assembly High-Level Meeting to Commemorate 75 Th Anniversary of the United Nations 21 September 2020
75th Session of the United Nations General Assembly High-level Meeting to commemorate 75 th Anniversary of the United Nations 21 September 2020 PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN, CHAIRMAN OF THE NON- ALIGNED MOVEMENT H.E. MR. ILHAM ALIYEV: Mr. President, Mr. Secretary-General, The Republic of Azerbaijan was elected as a chair of the Non-Aligned Movement in 2016 with a unanimous decision of all 120 countries. In October 2019 Azerbaijan assumed the chairmanship of the Non-Aligned Movement during the 18th Summit of the Heads of State and Government held in Baku. I have the honor to make this statement on behalf of Member States of Non- Aligned Movement. The Member States of Non-Aligned Movement highly appreciate the convening of this high-level meeting to commemorate the 75th anniversary of the signing of the UN Charter. The United Nations, its Charter, and the international law remain indispensable tools and central in the preservation and maintenance of international peace and security and the strengthening of international cooperation. While acknowledging its limitations, the UN remains the central multilateral forum for addressing global issues and challenges presently being confronted by all States. The NAM affirms that many new areas of concern and challenges have emerged, which require the renewal of commitment by the international community to uphold and defend the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law. Armed conflicts, aggressive expansionist policies, terrorism, separatism, transnational organized crime and extremism coupled with human rights abuses, financial crises and environmental degradation continue to affect millions of people around the world.