DOCSLIB.ORG

Synthesis Report Spsisc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Synthesis Report Spsisc SOCIAL PROTECTION AND SOCIAL INCLUSION IN ARMENIA , AZERBAIJAN AND GEORGIA SYNTHESIS REPORT European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Manuscript completed in 2011 European Commission Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission may be held responsible for the use that may be made of the information contained in this publication. Gesellschaft für Versicherungswissenschaft und –gestaltung e.V. Hansaring 43, D -50670 Köln www.gvg.org Authors: Birgit Garbe-Emden Sabine Horstmann Yvette Shajanian Zarneh © European Union, 2011 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 2 Table of Contents Introduction............................................................................................................................................ 5 1 Main factors influencing social protection and welfare ............................................................ 9 1.1 Economic trends...................................................................................................................... 9 Macroeconomic development.......................................................................................................... 9 Fiscal policies and state revenues ................................................................................................ 10 Inequalities and remittances.......................................................................................................... 10 Territorial disparities ...................................................................................................................... 11 1.2 Population and demographic trends...................................................................................... 12 Ethnic Minorities ............................................................................................................................ 12 Internally displaced persons (IDPs)............................................................................................... 13 1.3 Labour market trends ............................................................................................................ 14 Labour force participation and employment .................................................................................. 14 Unemployment............................................................................................................................... 17 Inactivity......................................................................................................................................... 19 Labour Market Policies .................................................................................................................. 19 1.4 Educational Systems ............................................................................................................. 20 Pre-school education..................................................................................................................... 21 Primary and secondary education................................................................................................. 21 Tertiary education.......................................................................................................................... 22 Vocational education ..................................................................................................................... 22 Access to education ...................................................................................................................... 23 1.5 Main challenges and Conclusions......................................................................................... 24 References ........................................................................................................................................ 26 2 Social Protection System ........................................................................................................... 35 2.1 Institutional legacies .............................................................................................................. 35 2.2 Overview on social protection expenditures.......................................................................... 36 2.3 Contributory benefits ............................................................................................................. 36 2.4 Non-contributory benefits ...................................................................................................... 37 2.5 Institutional changes and decentralisation ............................................................................ 38 2.6 Main challenges and conclusions.......................................................................................... 39 References ........................................................................................................................................ 40 3 Poverty and Social Exclusion .................................................................................................... 42 3.1 Historical Background............................................................................................................ 42 3.2 Profiles of Poverty and Social Exclusion ............................................................................... 43 Poverty and Social Exclusion in Armenia...................................................................................... 43 Poverty and Social Exclusion in Azerbaijan .................................................................................. 44 Poverty and Social Exclusion in Georgia ...................................................................................... 45 3.3 Determinants for Vulnerability ............................................................................................... 47 Household Composition ................................................................................................................ 47 Employment status ........................................................................................................................ 47 Educational level ........................................................................................................................... 48 Access to Health Services............................................................................................................. 49 Internally Displaced Persons......................................................................................................... 49 3.4 Main Challenges and Conclusions ........................................................................................ 50 References ........................................................................................................................................ 52 3 4 Pensions....................................................................................................................................... 57 4.1 Historical Background............................................................................................................ 57 4.2 Pension system developments since 1995 ........................................................................... 58 Pension system developments in Armenia ................................................................................... 58 Pension system developments in Azerbaijan................................................................................ 59 Pension system developments in Georgia .................................................................................... 59 Stakeholders and main drivers of reform ...................................................................................... 60 4.3 Main challenges and conclusions.......................................................................................... 61 Adequacy....................................................................................................................................... 61 Financial Sustainability.................................................................................................................. 62 Employment of the elderly, early retirement and increase of retirement....................................... 62 References ........................................................................................................................................ 64 5 Health............................................................................................................................................ 67 5.1 Historical Background............................................................................................................ 67 Overview on common Soviet legacies .......................................................................................... 67 5.2 Health system developments since 1995.............................................................................. 68 Health system developments in Armenia ...................................................................................... 68 Health system developments in Azerbaijan .................................................................................. 69 Health system developments in Georgia....................................................................................... 70 5.3 Health status in comparison .................................................................................................. 71 5.4 Financing ..............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download/Print the Study in PDF Format
    GENERAL ELECTIONS IN ARMENIA 6th May 2012 European Elections monitor Republican Party led by the President of the Republic Serzh Sarkisian is the main favourite in Corinne Deloy the general elections in Armenia. On 23rd February last the Armenian authorities announced that the next general elections would Analysis take place on 6th May. Nine political parties are running: the five parties represented in the Natio- 1 month before nal Assembly, the only chamber in parliament comprising the Republican Party of Armenia (HHK), the poll Prosperous Armenia (BHK), the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (HHD), Rule of Law (Orinats Erkir, OEK) and Heritage (Z), which is standing in a coalition with the Free Democrats of Khachatur Kokobelian, as well as the Armenian National Congress (HAK), the Communist Party (HKK), the Democratic Party and the United Armenians. The Armenian government led by Prime Minister Tigran Sarkisian (HHK) has comprised the Republi- can Party, Prosperous Armenia and Rule of Law since 21st March 2008. The Armenian Revolutionary Federation was a member of the government coalition until 2009 before leaving it because of its opposition to the government’s foreign policy. On 12th February last the Armenians elected their local representatives. The Republican Party led by President of the Republic Serzh Sarkisian won 33 of the 39 country’s towns. The opposition clai- med that there had been electoral fraud. The legislative campaign started on 8th April and will end on 4th May. 238 people working in Arme- nia’s embassies or consulates will be able to vote on 27th April and 1st May. The parties running Prosperous Armenia leader, Gagik Tsarukian will lead his The Republican Party will be led by the President of the party’s list.
    [Show full text]
  • ERENET PROFILE Issue
    ISSUE Vol. VII No. 1 January 2012 CONTENT ERENET PROFILE __________________________ WINTER MESSAGE 2 PAPERS PUBLISHER Dr. Péter Szirmai – Editor DEVELOPMENT OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND Dr. Antal Szabó – Scientific Director SME-SECTORS IN SOUTH-EASTERN CAUCASUS: Ágnes Kiss – Website Editor Tamás Tóth – Designer Development of the SME Sector in the Era of 3 INTERNATIONAL BOARD Emerging from the Economic Crises in Armenia Desislava Yordanova AleksanderPoghossian-TigranSukiasyan 29 St. Kliment Ohridski University Development of the SME Sector in the Era of Dr. Sanja Pfeifer Emerging from the Economic Crises in Azerbaijan University of Osiek AlakbarMammadov Dr. Hans-Jürgen Weißbach Emerging out the Economic Crises and Strategies of 44 Fachhochschule Frankfurt am Main Entrepreneurship Improvement and SME Dr. Dumitru Matis Development in Georgia Babeş-Bolyai University EteriMamukelashvili Dr. Szabo Zsuzsanna University of Tirgu Mures Dr. Eric Dejan CONFERENCE PAPERS University of Belgrade • GlobalMicrocreditSummit2011concludedinSpain 61 Dr. Mateja Drnovsek • Dynamo-FirstNationalDayonBusinessContinuity 63 University of Ljubljana • RecognizingInnovativeSMEsinMalaysia 64 Dr. Toni Brunello Studiocentroveneto INSTITUTIONAL PROFILE Dr. Renáta Vokorokosová, University of Kosice • InternationalCouncilforSmallBusiness-ICSB Dr. Krzysztof Wach CALLS EVENTS Cracow University Dr. Sonia Heptonstall • GlobalBusinessIncubatorManagementTraining, 66 UBIS Geneva Istanbul 68 Dr. Sybille Heilbrunn • DoctoralCourceinEntrepreneurshipEducation, Ruppin Academic
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Normal Retirement Age for Pension Plans
    American Academy of Actuaries MARCH 2009 MARCH 2013 Key Points Rethinking Normal Retirement Age for Pension Plans n Social Security normal retirement age has been raised to 67 for all he American Academy of Actuaries currently advocates that any individuals born after 1960. Tresolution to the long-term financing problems of the Social n ERISA currently does not allow a plan Security system should include an increase in the Social Security sponsor to raise the normal retirement normal retirement age. This issue brief investigates the effect of age for DB plans beyond age 65 to be similarly raising the normal retirement age in a qualified defined consistent with Social Security. benefit (DB) pension plan, and analyzes the merits of such a move. n Aligning the normal retirement Many of the issues identified in the Academy’s 2008 Social Se- age for DB plans with the Social curity position statement, Actuaries Advocate Raising Social Secu- Security normal retirement age would rity’s Retirement Age, and the Social Security Committee’s 2010 facilitate and encourage more workers issue brief, Raising the Retirement Age for Social Security, includ- to remain in the workforce longer. ing longevity and demographic concerns, apply equally to the n Changes to ERISA should allow, but idea of allowing employer-sponsored plans to raise their plan’s not require, employers to increase normal retirement age. Notably, that issue brief discusses impor- their normal retirement age. tant behavioral effects that a defined normal retirement age can n Transition rules should be considered have. Permitting employers to increase the normal retirement age carefully.
    [Show full text]
  • Raising the Retirement Age for Social Security
    American Academy of Actuaries MARCH 2009 OCTOBER 2010 Key Points Raising the Retirement Age When Social Security began paying for Social Security monthly benefits in 1940, workers could receive unreduced retired-worker benefits his issue brief examines in some detail the potential impact of beginning at age 65. This age is known as the Normal Retirement Age (NRA). Traising the retirement age. It is important to note that the Social Insurance Committee of the American Academy of Actuaries has To address an impending solvency crisis, changes legislated in 1983 included gradu- extensively reviewed different reform options for Social Security. ally increasing the NRA (from age 65 to For example, a recent issue brief on Social Security Reform fo- 67) beginning in 2000, recognizing that cuses on possible changes in the benefit formula or in the federal longevity had increased greatly since the income tax treatment of Social Security benefits. The Academy be- system began. lieves that raising the retirement age is one component, though a Social Security now faces another solvency necessary one, of restoring Social Security’s financial health. challenge, with long-term income pro- jected to be insufficient to pay promised Background benefits. Raising the NRA further would improve Social Security’s Board of Trustees projects that, under their best-esti- Social Security’s financial status. Depend- mate assumptions, income to the system will be insufficient to finance ing on the timing and magnitude, raising its benefits in the long run, absent corrective legislation. These finan- the NRA could make a significant contri- cial problems stem partly from the impact of individuals’ living longer bution toward restoring the Social Security and receiving Social Security benefits for a longer period of time, and program to long-range actuarial balance and sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Armenia's Progress on the Tobacco Control Scale
    Open Access Research BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004410 on 27 February 2014. Downloaded from Measuring Armenia’s progress on the Tobacco Control Scale: an evaluation of tobacco control in an economy in transition, 2005–2009 Narine K Movsisyan,1 Gregory N Connolly2 To cite: Movsisyan NK, ABSTRACT Strengths and limitations of this study Connolly GN. Measuring Objectives: This study aimed to measure the 5-year Armenia’s progress progress in the implementation of WHO Framework ▪ on the Tobacco Control The fist study to assess the Framework Convention Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in Armenia by Scale: an evaluation of on Tobacco Control (FCTC) implementation in tobacco control in an applying the Tobacco Control Scale, a rapid assessment Armenia. economy in transition, 2005– tool developed to assess the strength of tobacco control ▪ Applies the Tobacco Control Scale, an important 2009. BMJ Open 2014;4: policies in Europe. rapid assessment tool for measuring the strength e004410. doi:10.1136/ Setting: Armenia, an economy in transition, has extreme of tobacco control policies, to a transition country bmjopen-2013-004410 smoking rates among men (62.5%) despite acceding to such as Armenia, highlights the weaknesses of the FCTC in 2004. However, little research has been carried out scale and makes recommendations to enhance its ▸ Prepublication history and to evaluate Armenia’s progress in tobacco control. validity and reliability. additional material for this Methods: The Tobacco Control Scale total score was ▪ The findings from this study are limited to paper is available online. To estimated for Armenia using the original methodology; Armenia and similar economies in transition.
    [Show full text]
  • Years in Armenia
    1O Years of Independence and Transition in Armenia National Human Development Report Armenia 2OO1 Team of Authors National Project Director Zorab Mnatsakanyan National Project Coordinator-Consultant Nune Yeghiazaryan Chapter 1 Mkrtich Zardaryan, PhD (History) Aram Harutunyan Khachatur Bezirchyan, PhD (Biology) Avetik Ishkhanyan, PhD (Geology) Boris Navasardyan Ashot Zalinyan, PhD (Economics) Sos Gimishyan Edward Ordyan, Doctor of Science (Economics) Chapter 2 Ara Karyan, PhD (Economics) Stepan Mantarlyan, PhD (Economics) Bagrat Tunyan, PhD (Economics) Narine Sahakyan, PhD (Economics) Chapter 3 Gyulnara Hovhanessyan, PhD (Economics) Anahit Sargsyan, PhD (Economics) "Spiritual Armenia" NGO, Anahit Harutunyan, PhD (Philology) Chapter 4 Viktoria Ter-Nikoghosyan, PhD (Biophysics) Aghavni Karakhanyan Economic Research Institute of the RA Ministry of Finance & Economy, Armenak Darbinyan, PhD (Economics) Nune Yeghiazaryan Hrach Galstyan, PhD (Biology) Authors of Boxes Information System of St. Echmiadzin Sergey Vardanyan, "Spiritual Armenia" NGO Gagik Gyurjyan, Head of RA Department of Preservation of Historical and Cultural Monuments Gevorg Poghosyan, Armenian Sociological Association Bagrat Sahakyan Yerevan Press Club "Logika", Independent Research Center on Business and Finance Arevik Petrosian, Aharon Mkrtchian, Public Sector Reform Commission, Working Group on Civil Service Reforms Armen Khudaverdian, Secretary of Public Sector Reform Commission "Orran" Benevolent NGO IOM/Armenia office Karine Danielian, Association "For Sustainable Human
    [Show full text]
  • Azerbaijan Pharmaceutical Country Profile
    Azerbaijan PHARMACEUTICAL COUNTRY PROFILE Azerbaijan Pharmaceutical Country Profile Published by the Ministry of Health in collaboration with the World Health Organization 12/05/2011 Any part of this document may be freely reviewed, quoted, reproduced, or translated in full or in part, provided that the source is acknowledged. It may not be sold, or used in conjunction with commercial purposes or for profit. This document was produced with the support of the World Health Organization (WHO) Azerbaijan Country Office, and all reasonable precautions have been taken to verify the information contained herein. The published material does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization, and is being distributed without any warranty of any kind – either expressed or implied. The responsibility for interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. ii Foreword The 2011 Pharmaceutical Country Profile for Azerbaijan has been produced by the Ministry of Health, in collaboration with the World Health Organization. This document contains information on existing socio-economic and health- related conditions, resources; as well as on regulatory structures, processes and outcomes relating to the pharmaceutical sector in Azerbaijan. The compiled data comes from international sources (e.g. the World Health Statistics1,2), surveys conducted in the previous years and country level information collected in 2011. The sources of data for each piece of information are presented in the tables that can be found at the end of this document. On the behalf of the Ministry of Azerbaijan, I wish to express my appreciation to WHO Country Office in Azerbaijan for its contribution to the process of data collection and the development of this profile.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Report Submitted by the Russian Federation Pursuant to The
    ACFC/SR/II(2005)003 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 26 April 2005) MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION REPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Report of the Russian Federation on the progress of the second cycle of monitoring in accordance with Article 25 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities MOSCOW, 2005 2 Table of contents PREAMBLE ..............................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................4 2. The legislation of the Russian Federation for the protection of national minorities rights5 3. Major lines of implementation of the law of the Russian Federation and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities .............................................................15 3.1. National territorial subdivisions...................................................................................15 3.2 Public associations – national cultural autonomies and national public organizations17 3.3 National minorities in the system of federal government............................................18 3.4 Development of Ethnic Communities’ National
    [Show full text]
  • Cis) Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders Annual Report 2009
    / eUROPE ANd The COMMONweAlTh oF INDEPENdeNT sTATes (cis) observatory for the protection of human rights defenders annual report 2009 …369 / regIoNAl ANALYSIs WESTerN eUROPE1 observatory for the protection of human rights defenders annual report 2009 Whereas in 2008 the European Union (EU) was particularly proactive towards human rights defenders in countries that do not belong to the European Community, defenders in EU countries also had to face obstacles of some importance to their activities in defence of human rights and fundamental freedoms. On February 6, 2008, the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe adopted a declara- tion with a view to “improve the protection of human rights defenders 2 and promote their activities” . The Committee of Ministers called on Member States to “create an environment conducive to the work of human rights defenders” and on all Council of Europe institutions to “pay special attention to issues concerning human rights defenders”. The Committee also invited the Commissioner for Human Rights to provide strong and effective protection to defenders, in particular by continuing to meet with a broad range of defenders during his country 3 visits and by reporting publicly on the situation of human rights defenders, and also by intervening with the competent authorities on the problems human rights defenders may face, especially in situations where there is a need for urgent action. However, on the pretext of striking a balance between freedom and security, European Governments have at times in recent years devel- oped initiatives that limit individual rights – electronic surveillance, increase in the number of data bases recording personal data, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Security in the South Caucasus
    CLIMATE CHANGE AND SECURITY IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA, REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN AND GEORGIA Regional Assessment ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PROJECT CO-ORDINATION Within the framework of the project Climate Change and Security in Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the Southern Caucasus under the Christine Kitzler, Dana Bogdan (OSCE) Environment and Security Initiative (ENVSEC), one of the four main activities aimed at identifying and mapping climate change and security risks in Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the South Caucasus in a participatory way, the conclusions of which are presented in the current report for the South Caucasus. ASSESSMENT CO-ORDINATION Harald Egerer, Pier Carlo Sandei, Filippo Montalbetti (UN Environment), Valentin Yemelin (GRID-Arendal) The Austrian Development Agency (ADA) has co-funded the project by providing financial resources for the project activities in the pilot region in the Dniester River Basin. Moreover, the ENVSEC initiative partners the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UN Environment, the United Nations Economic Commission for LEAD AUTHOR Europe (UNECE) and the Regional Environmental Centre for Central and Eastern Europe (REC) contributed their own resources to the Ieva Rucevska (GRID-Arendal) implementation of this project. CONTRIBUTORS AND REVIEWERS Nino Malashkhia (OSCE) Trine Kirkfeldt, Hanne Jørstad, Valentin Yemelin (GRID-Arnedal) Mahir Aliyev (UN Environment) Zsolt Lengyel (Climate East Policy) The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the ENVSEC partner organizations, their donors or the participating States. Participants in the national consultations that took place in the Republic of Armenia (Yerevan, 12 May 2014), the Republic of Azerbaijan (Baku, 30 May 2014) and in Georgia (Tbilisi, 8 May 2014) commented and contributed to the regional assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas De Waal the Caucasus
    THE CAUCASUS This page intentionally left blank THE CAUCASUS AN INTRODUCTION Thomas de Waal 1 2010 1 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2010 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data de Waal, Thomas. The Caucasus : an introduction / Thomas de Waal. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-19-539976-9; 978-0-19-539977-6 (pbk.) 1. Caucasus Region—Politics and government. 2. Caucasus Region—History. 3. Caucasus Region—Relations—Russia. 4. Russia—Relations—Caucasus Region. 5. Caucasus Region—Relations—Soviet Union. 6. Soviet Union—Relations—Caucasus Region. I. Title. DK509.D33 2010 947.5—dc22 2009052376 1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper To Zoe This page intentionally left blank Contents Introduction 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in Armenia, Practical Law Country Q&A 8-638-0858 (2018)
    Doing Business in Armenia, Practical Law Country Q&A 8-638-0858 (2018) Doing Business in Armenia by Sedrak Asatryan, Aram Orbelyan, Janna Simonyan, Narine Beglaryan, Roustam Badasyan, Senior Associate and Ani Varderesyan, Concern Dialog Country Q&A | Law stated as at 01-May-2018 | Armenia A Q&A guide to doing business in Armenia. This Q&A gives an overview of key recent developments affecting doing business in Armenia as well as an introduction to the legal system; foreign investment, including restrictions, currency regulations and incentives; and business vehicles and their relevant restrictions and liabilities. The article also summarises the laws regulating employment relationships, including redundancies and mass layoffs, and provides short overviews on competition law; data protection; and product liability and safety. In addition, there are comprehensive summaries on taxation and tax residency; and intellectual property rights over patents, trade marks, registered and unregistered designs. This article is part of the global guide to doing business worldwide. For a full list of contents, please visit www.practicallaw.com/ dbi-guide. Overview 1. What are the key recent developments affecting doing business in your jurisdiction? With the inauguration of Armenia’s new president, the Constitution, as amended in 2015, has fully entered into force. Therefore, Armenia currently operates under a parliamentary system of government. The RA Tax Code, which was adopted in 2016, has replaced a number of separate laws regulating different types of taxes. It partially entered into force in 2017 and since the beginning of 2018 has been fully in force in Armenia. The New Civil Procedure Code of 2018 has recently entered into force.
    [Show full text]