DOCSLIB.ORG

Klamath Tribes Forest Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Klamath Tribes Forest Management Plan A Plan for the Klamath Tribes’ Management of the Klamath Reservation Forest May, 2008 K. Norman Johnson Jerry F. Franklin Debora L. Johnson The cover picture was taken at the Bull Pasture stand southeast of Buckhorn Springs.All pictures without credits in the report were taken on the Reservation Forest during our field work. Contents Introduction Part I: The Desired Future Condition ................................................................ 222 Goals for Restorative Management of the Klamath Reservation ............................................. 3 19th and Early 20th Century Forest Conditions on Klamath Reservation Forest.................... 5 Key disturbance processes .................................................................................................... 6 Change from historical conditions .......................................................................................... 8 Desired Future Conditions for the Habitat Types of the Klamath Reservation Forest ............ 9 Habitat Types Historically Dominated by Ponderosa Pine .............................................. 11 Representative stands to use as a guide to desired future conditions ...................... 13 Structural goals ........................................................................................................ 17 Large trees .......................................................................................................... 17 Small trees .......................................................................................................... 17 Susceptibility to insect attack ............................................................................. 19 Shrubs ................................................................................................................ 20 Red Fir and Mountain Hemlock Habitat Types............................................................... 20 Lodgepole Pine Habitat Types ........................................................................................ 20 Lodgepole Pine/Bitterbrush ..................................................................................... 21 Proposed management strategy .......................................................................... 22 Maintaining/enhancing bitterbrush .................................................................... 23 Lodgepole Pine on Ponderosa Pine Sites .................................................................. 24 Wet Lodgepole Pine .................................................................................................. 24 Lodgepole pine on marginal and high elevation sites ................................................ 25 Aspen, Willow, and Other Hardwoods ............................................................................ 26 Meadows ........................................................................................................................ 26 Shrub lands, sagebrush, and juniper habitat types ........................................................ 26 Riparian Areas ................................................................................................................ 27 Roads ............................................................................................................................. 27 Relationship of Proposed Approach to Climate Change ....................................................... 27 Part II: Current Condition and Needed Activities .................................................................. 313131 Complex Forests .................................................................................................................. 31 Simplified Forests ................................................................................................................ 31 A Proposed Revised Classification ....................................................................................... 33 Locating the Remaining Complex Forest .............................................................................. 34 Considering Watersheds and Rivers .................................................................................... 36 An Overall Strategy for Restoring the Klamath Reservation Forests ..................................... 37 Recognizing Different Management Emphases on the Reservation Forest ........................... 38 Comparison to the Forest Service Plan ................................................................................ 40 Identifying Management Reference Sites and Generalized Prescriptions ............................. 40 Inventory and Monitoring ..................................................................................................... 46 Prescriptions for Reference Areas ................................................................................................... 525252 Part III: Current Inventory and Growth, Harvest Estimates, Costs, Revenues, and Organization .......................................................................................................................................696969 Inventory Data ..................................................................................................................... 69 All forest types (Tables I1a, I1b) ..................................................................................... 70 All Forest Types .............................................................................................................. 72 The Ponderosa Pine/Mixed Conifer Types ..................................................................... 72 Current Growth on the Ponderosa Pine/Mixed-Conifer Types ................................. 73 Biomass .................................................................................................................... 74 Comparison of Desired Future Conditions and Current Conditions .................................... 75 Testing Treatment Effectiveness .......................................................................................... 76 Landscape planning for fuels management on the Klamath Reservation ............................. 77 Potential Economic Return from Timber Sales on the Klamath Reservation Forest .............. 80 Market Discussion ......................................................................................................... 80 Sample Appraisals ......................................................................................................... 82 Eastside Buyers ............................................................................................................. 83 Application of the Prescriptions: Residual Stand Conditions and Harvest Per Acre ............ 88 Potential Total Harvest over the Next 20 Years .................................................................... 91 Using Biomass from the Klamath Reservation Forest to Fuel a Biomass Plant..................... 92 Plan Implementation ............................................................................................................ 93 Targeted fuels reduction near towns and settlements .................................................... 94 Density and fuels reduction across the Reservation Forest -- a landscape approach ..... 94 Specific Goals, Standards, and Guidelines for Management of the Klamath Reservation Forest ............................................................................................................................. 96 Forest-wide Goals, Standards, and Guidelines .................................................................... 97 Forest Management Strategies ....................................................................................... 97 General Goals ........................................................................................................... 97 Tree Removal ............................................................................................................ 97 Snag and Down Wood ............................................................................................... 97 Fish, Wildlife, and Sensitive Plants ................................................................................. 98 Mule Deer Habitat Objectives and Standards ........................................................... 99 History (adapted from a paper by Rick Ward) ...................................................... 99 Approach .......................................................................................................... 100 Desired future condition ................................................................................... 101 Standards.......................................................................................................... 102 Guidelines ........................................................................................................ 103 Raptors and Colonial Nesting Birds ........................................................................ 104 Bald eagles ............................................................................................................ 104 Threatened and Endangered Species ........................................................................... 105 Northern spotted owls ............................................................................................. 105 Water Quality and Riparian Management ..................................................................... 105 Standards ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oregon Historic Trails Report Book (1998)
    i ,' o () (\ ô OnBcox HrsroRrc Tnans Rpponr ô o o o. o o o o (--) -,J arJ-- ö o {" , ã. |¡ t I o t o I I r- L L L L L (- Presented by the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council L , May,I998 U (- Compiled by Karen Bassett, Jim Renner, and Joyce White. Copyright @ 1998 Oregon Trails Coordinating Council Salem, Oregon All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Oregon Historic Trails Report Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Project history 3 Introduction to Oregon's Historic Trails 7 Oregon's National Historic Trails 11 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail I3 Oregon National Historic Trail. 27 Applegate National Historic Trail .41 Nez Perce National Historic Trail .63 Oregon's Historic Trails 75 Klamath Trail, 19th Century 17 Jedediah Smith Route, 1828 81 Nathaniel Wyeth Route, t83211834 99 Benjamin Bonneville Route, 1 833/1 834 .. 115 Ewing Young Route, 1834/1837 .. t29 V/hitman Mission Route, 184l-1847 . .. t4t Upper Columbia River Route, 1841-1851 .. 167 John Fremont Route, 1843 .. 183 Meek Cutoff, 1845 .. 199 Cutoff to the Barlow Road, 1848-1884 217 Free Emigrant Road, 1853 225 Santiam Wagon Road, 1865-1939 233 General recommendations . 241 Product development guidelines 243 Acknowledgements 241 Lewis & Clark OREGON National Historic Trail, 1804-1806 I I t . .....¡.. ,r la RivaÌ ï L (t ¡ ...--."f Pðiräldton r,i " 'f Route description I (_-- tt |".
    [Show full text]
  • USGS USGS Geologic Investigations Series I-2569, Pamphlet
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP I–2569 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF UPPER EOCENE TO HOLOCENE VOLCANIC AND RELATED ROCKS OF THE CASCADE RANGE, OREGON By David R. Sherrod and James G. Smith INTRODUCTION volcanic-hosted mineral deposits and even to potential volcanic hazards. Since 1979, Earth scientists of the Geothermal Historically, the regional geology of the Cascade Research Program of the U.S. Geological Survey have Range in Oregon has been interpreted through recon­ carried out multidisciplinary research in the Cascade naissance studies of large areas (for example, Diller, Range. The goal of this research is to understand 1898; Williams, 1916; Callaghan and Buddington, the geology, tectonics, and hydrology of the Cas­ cades in order to characterize and quantify geothermal 1938; Williams, 1942, 1957; Peck and others, 1964). Early studies were hampered by limited access, resource potential. A major goal of the program generally poor exposures, and thick forest cover, which is compilation of a comprehensive geologic map of flourishes in the 100 to 250 cm of annual precipi­ the entire Cascade Range that incorporates modern tation west of the range crest. In addition, age control field studies and that has a unified and internally con­ was scant and limited chiefly to fossil flora. Since sistent explanation. This map is one of three in a series that shows then, access has greatly improved via a well-devel- oped network of logging roads, and isotopic ages— Cascade Range geology by fitting published and mostly potassium-argon (K-Ar)—have gradually solved unpublished mapping into a province-wide scheme some major problems concerning timing of volcan­ of rock units distinguished by composition and age; ism and age of mapped units.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Deschutes River · ·Basin Prehistory
    Upper Deschutes River · ·Basin Prehistory: A Preliminary Examination of Flaked Stone Tools and Debitage Michael W. Taggart 2002 ·~. ... .. " .. • '·:: ••h> ·';'"' •..,. •.• '11\•.. ...... :f~::.. ·:·. .. ii AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Michael W. Taggart for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies in Anthropology. Anthropology. and Geography presented on April 19. 2002. Title: Upper Deschutes River Basin Prehistory: A Preliminary Examination of Flaked Stone Tools and Debitage. The prehistory of Central Oregon is explored through the examination of six archaeological sites and two isolated finds from the Upper Deschutes River Basin. Inquiry focuses on the land use, mobility, technological organization, and raw material procurement of the aboriginal inhabitants of the area. Archaeological data presented here are augmented with ethnographic accounts to inform interpretations. Eight stone tool assemblages and three debitage assemblages are analyzed in order to characterize technological organization. Diagnostic projectile points recovered from the study sites indicate the area was seasonally utilized prior to the eruption of ancient Mt. Mazama (>6,845 BP), and continuing until the Historic period (c. 1850). While there is evidence of human occupation at the study sites dating to between >7,000- 150 B.P., the range of activities and intensity of occupation varied. Source characterization analysis indicates that eight different Central Oregon obsidian sources are represented at the sites. Results of the lithic analysis are presented in light of past environmental and social phenomena including volcanic eruptions, climate change, and human population movements. Chapter One introduces the key questions that directed the inquiry and defines the theoretical perspective used. Chapter Two describes the modem and ancient environmental context of study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Country Welcome To
    Travel Guide To OREGON Indian Country Welcome to OREGON Indian Country he members of Oregon’s nine federally recognized Ttribes and Travel Oregon invite you to explore our diverse cultures in what is today the state of Oregon. Hundreds of centuries before Lewis & Clark laid eyes on the Pacific Ocean, native peoples lived here – they explored; hunted, gathered and fished; passed along the ancestral ways and observed the ancient rites. The many tribes that once called this land home developed distinct lifestyles and traditions that were passed down generation to generation. Today these traditions are still practiced by our people, and visitors have a special opportunity to experience our unique cultures and distinct histories – a rare glimpse of ancient civilizations that have survived since the beginning of time. You’ll also discover that our rich heritage is being honored alongside new enterprises and technologies that will carry our people forward for centuries to come. The following pages highlight a few of the many attractions available on and around our tribal centers. We encourage you to visit our award-winning native museums and heritage centers and to experience our powwows and cultural events. (You can learn more about scheduled powwows at www.traveloregon.com/powwow.) We hope you’ll also take time to appreciate the natural wonders that make Oregon such an enchanting place to visit – the same mountains, coastline, rivers and valleys that have always provided for our people. Few places in the world offer such a diversity of landscapes, wildlife and culture within such a short drive. Many visitors may choose to visit all nine of Oregon’s federally recognized tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Sycan Watershed Analysis
    Lower Sycan Watershed Analysis Fremont-Winema National Forest 2005 Lower Sycan River T33S,R12E,S23 Lower Sycan Watershed Analysis Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 1 General Watershed Area.....................................................................................................................................2 Geology and Soils.................................................................................................................................................5 Climate..................................................................................................................................................................6 STEP 1. CHARACTERIZATION OF THE WATERSHED ................................................................... 7 I. Watershed and Aquatics.................................................................................................................................7 Soils And Geomorphology...............................................................................................................................................10 Aquatic Habitat ................................................................................................................................................................10 II. Vegetation.....................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Quality Data from Upper Klamath and Agency Lakes, Oregon, 2009–10
    Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation Water-Quality Data from Upper Klamath and Agency Lakes, Oregon, 2009–10 Open-File Report 2012–1142 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Meteorological and water quality monitoring site MDN on Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, with Mt. McLoughlin in the background. (Photograph by D. Blake Eldridge, U.S. Geological Survey, July 12, 2011.) Water-Quality Data from Upper Klamath and Agency Lakes, Oregon, 2009–10 By D. Blake Eldridge, Sara L. Caldwell Eldridge, Liam N. Schenk, Dwight Q. Tanner, and Tamara M. Wood Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation Open-File Report 2012–1142 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Eldridge. D.B., Caldwell Eldridge, S.L., Schenk, L.N., Tanner, D.Q., and Wood, T.M., 2012, Water-quality data from Upper Klamath and Agency Lakes, Oregon, 2009–10: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012–1142, 32 p. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • KLAMATH HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT [FERC No
    KLAMATH HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT [FERC No. 2082] REQUEST FOR DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY Copco No. 1, c1915 PacifiCorp Archives Photo for PacifiCorp, Portland, OR Prepared by George Kramer, M.S., HP Preservation Specialist Under contract to CH2M-Hill Corvallis, OR October 2003 App E-6E DOE 1_Cover.doc DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR THE NATIONAL REGISTER Property Name: KLAMATH HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT Date of Construction: 1903-1958 Address: N/A County: Klamath, Oregon Siskiyou, California Original Use: Hydroelectric Generation Current Use: Hydroelectric Generation Style: Utilitarian/Industrial Theme: Commerce/Industrial _____________________________________________________________________________________ PRIMARY SIGNIFICANCE: The resources of the Klamath Hydroelectric Project were built between 1903 and 1958 by the California Oregon Power Company and its various pioneer predecessors and are now owned and operated by PacifiCorp under Federal Energy Regulatory License No. 2082. The resources of the project are strongly associated with the early development of electricity in the southern Oregon and northern California region and played a significant role in the area’s economy both directly, as a part of a regionally-significant, locally-owned and operated, private utility, and indirectly, through the role that increased electrical capacity played in the expansion of the timber, agriculture, and recreation industries during the first six decades of the 20th century. The Klamath Hydroelectric Project is considered regionally significant and eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion “A” for its association with the industrial and economic development of southern Oregon and northern California. [See Statement of Significance, Page 19] Copco No. 1, Dam and Gatehouse, 2002 In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places.
    [Show full text]
  • BLM Wood River Wetland Water Quality and Subsidence Reversal Monitoring Summary 2012, January 14, 2013
    BLM Wood River Wetland Water Quality and Subsidence Reversal Monitoring Summary 2012, January 14, 2013 Background: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) completed a Resource Management Plan for the Wood River Wetland in 1996. The primary goals and objectives for the 3,000 acre parcel were to improve water quality and quantity entering Agency Lake and provide habitat for endangered species, other wildlife species, and to provide for recreational opportunities. Recent management history can be summarized as follows: 1996 - Grazing cessation and implementation of seasonal flooding and water management infrastructure. 1996-2005 - Water management aimed at minimizing nutrient export (minimal pumping) and reduced irrigation. This management led to high wetland water nutrient loads and lack of perennial emergent vegetation cover over much of the property (see Carpenter et al 2009). o Typically, approximately 1,000 acre-feet of irrigation was applied in September. 2006-present – Implementation of a carefully managed water regime aimed at optimizing vegetation establishment, water storage and discharge, water quality treatment, and the accumulation of new organic soil (subsidence reversal). Pumping and irrigation were substantially increased. o Increased level of water quality, soils, and vegetatative cover monitoring to better understand and adapt to changing vegetation and water quality outcomes. 2008 – Five Artesian wells with high nutrient concentrations were fully decommissioned and/or capped with ball valves/pressure-gauges. This report summarizes recent water quality and subsidence reversal monitoring reuslts and water management data. Current Water Management: Typically, a water management level target is set for the beginning and end of the growing season (the 2012 target is the red line in Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • KLAMATH NEWS the Indicator Species
    Page 1, Klamath News 2010 KLAMATH NEWS THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE KLAMATH TRIBES: KLAMATH, MODOC, AND YAHOOSKIN TREATY OF 1864 Winema Charley Mogenkaskit Lalo Schonchin Captain Jack Volume 35, Issue 1 The Klamath Tribes, P.O. Box 436, Chiloquin, OR 97624 1ST QTR. ISSUE 2019 1-800-524-9787 or (541) 783-2219 Website: www.klamathtribes.org JANUARY-MARCH Tucked away in a corner of Oregon... There is a Tribe, With extraordinary people... Doing monumental work to Save an Indigenous Species from Extinction! Nowhere else in the World (The c'waam) - The Lost River Sucker The Cleaner's of the Water ... If the fish die, the People Die. The Indicator Species THE KLAMATH TRIBES AQUATICS PROGRAM The Klamath Tribes P.O. Box 436 PRESORTED FIRST-CLASS MAIL Chiloquin, OR 97624 The Klamath Tribes Aquatic Program is within the Natural Resources U.S. POSTAGE PAID Department and employs 18 permanent staff and a few seasonal in- CHILOQUIN, OR terns and temporary workers. The program is housed at the Research ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED PERMIT NO. 4 Station located four miles east of Chiloquin, Oregon at the historic Braymill site. In 1988, the Research Station began as a small research hatchery and fish rearing ponds located across the road from the cur- rent Research Station along the Sprague River. At that time, the entire Natural Resources Program included only five full time employees including Don Gentry, Craig Bienz, Jacob Kann, Larry Dunsmoor, Elwood (Cisco) Miller, and a couple of seasonal technicians. Currently, the Research Station consists of two large buildings and parking lot.
    [Show full text]
  • The Klamath Bird Observatory 2004 Bird Monitoring Effort Report
    Summary Report on Long-term Bird Monitoring Efforts by the Klamath Bird Observatory in 2005 Robert I. Frey and John D. Alexander 16 December 2005 Background The Klamath Bird Observatory (KBO) continued its comprehensive, long-term bird monitoring program in the Klamath Bioregion of northern California and southern Oregon during 2005. The objectives of this program are to collect data that provide an index to species diversity and abundance in riparian and upland habitats, to evaluate the reproductive success and population health of Neotropical migratory and resident birds, to maintain a long-term monitoring effort for tracking landbird population trends, and to test methods for effectively monitoring special species. The Klamath Bioregion lies within the Partners in Flight (PIF) Pacific and Intermountain West Avifaunal Biomes, which includes 35 bird species identified as focal species for conservation and monitoring efforts (Altman 1999, 2000, Rich et al. 2004; Tables 1a and 1b). KBO’s monitoring efforts are part of a regional program that started in the early 90s (Klamath Demographic Monitoring Network; Alexander et al. 2004). As a part of this program, during 2005 KBO maintained a long-term effort to track population trends and demographics at constant effort mist-netting stations, breeding bird census routes and extensive point count census routes throughout the Bioregion. The census efforts are documented in a separate report (Stephens and Alexander 2005). This report is focused on the summary of 2005 Constant-Effort Stations (CES), Rapid Ornithological Inventories (ROI), Special Species Monitoring, Technical Training, and Outreach efforts. These efforts were designed and completed in close collaboration with the US Forest Service Redwood Sciences Laboratory (RSL).
    [Show full text]
  • Change There Can Be No Breakthroughs, Without Breakthroughs There Changecan Be No Future
    Page 1, Klamath News 2010 KLAMATH NEWS THE OFFICIAL Publication OF THE KLAMath TRIBES: KLAMath, MODOC, AND YAHOOSKIN Treaty OF 1864 Winema Charley Mogenkaskit Lalo Schonchin Captain Jack Volume 26, Issue 4 The Klamath Tribes, P.O. Box 436, Chiloquin, OR 97624 JUNE 2010 1-800-524-9787 or (541) 783-2219 Website: www.klamathtribes.org New Klamath Tribal Council takes office MEET OUR LEADERS , the 2010-2013 newly elected The Klamath Tribes PRESORTED Klamath Tribal Council, who took office on Thursday, P.O. Box 436 FIRST-CLASS MAIL Chiloquin, OR 97624 U.S. POSTAGE PAID May 13, following the swear-in ceremony at the Tribal CHILOQUIN, OR Administration building in Chiloquin, Oregon. PERMIT NO. 4 Front Row Left to Right: Charles E. Kimbol, Sr., GeorGene Nelson, Don Gentry, Gary ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED Frost, Brandi Decker. Back Row Left to Right: Jeff Mitchell, Bert Lawvor Sr., Frank Summers, Shawn L. Jackson, and Torina Case. Without change there can be no breakthroughs, Without breakthroughs there Changecan be no future... Welcome to the Future! Page 2, Klamath News 2010 The Klamath News is a Tribal Government Publication of the Swear-in Ceremony for Tribal Council Klamath Tribes, (the Klamath, Modoc, and Yahooskin Band of Snake Indians). * Distribution: Publications are distributed at the end of the month, or as fund- ing allows. * Deadline: Information submitted for publication must be received by the 15th of each month- (for the following month’s publication). * Submissions: Submissions should be typed and not exceed 500 words. Submissions must include the author’s signature, address and phone number.
    [Show full text]
  • View the Klamath Summary Report
    SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT — KLAMATH BASIN GENERAL STREAM ADJUDICATION From the top of a fault formed ridge overlooking the expansive Upper Klamath Lake, the rest of the world seems to fall away. Unbroken blue skies and dry, thin air stretches the horizon impossibly far. To the east, parched buttes roll through deep, green farm-filled valleys. To the west, only the rugged, snow- capped Cascades can rein in the view. The feeling of freedom that defines the American West is alive in this place. Prepared by the Oregon Water Resources Department — October 1999 he Klamath Basin defies the soggy Northwest stereotype. The Cascade TMountains steal the moisture from eastward winds, transforming the damp, green Oregon known to most of the country. Away from the mountainsides, Lodge Pole and Ponderosa Pines supplant the water-dependent firs. The moss-covered logs and thick tangles of plants of the western forests are gone. In their place, reddish- black volcanic rocks speckle hillsides adorned with dusty sage. Sandy pumice soils are exposed to the wind and sun by the sparse ground cover. Everything seems to crack and crumble underfoot. Despite these desert-like conditions, an oasis of lakes, rivers, and marshes teams with wildlife. The remnants of a huge prehistoric lake once provided a cache of resources that allowed the Basin’s earliest human inhabitants to thrive in an otherwise formi- dable environment. Much time has passed and cultures have changed, but the reliance on these same resources has not. For more than 100 years, settlers, homesteaders, and their descendants have defied the desert by transforming vast lakes and marshes into farms and pasture–creating a heritage in the process.
    [Show full text]