The Live Bird Trade in Tanzania

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Live Bird Trade in Tanzania lUCN Species Survival Commission The Live Bird Trade in Tanzania N. Leader-Williams and R. K. Tibanyenda Editors Occasional Paper of the lUCN Species Survival Commission No. 16 lUCN The World Conservation Union The Live Bird Trade in Tanzania IUCN – The World Conservation Union Founded in 1948, The World Conservation Union brings together States, government agencies and a diverse range of non-governmental organizations in a unique world partnership: over 913 members in all, spread across some 136 countries. As a Union, IUCN seeks to influence, encourage and assist societies throughout the world to conserve the integrity and diversity of nature and to ensure that any use of natural resources is equitable and ecologically sustainable. A central secretariat coordinates the IUCN Programme and serves the Union membership, representing their views on the world stage and providing them with the strategies, services, scientific knowledge and technical support they need to achieve their goals. Through its six Commissions, IUCN draws together over 6000 expert volunteers in project teams and action groups, focusing in particular on species and biodiversity conservation and the management of habitats and natural resources. The Union has helped many countries to prepare National Conservation Strategies, and demonstrates the application of its knowledge through the field projects it supervises. Operations are increasingly decentralized and are carried forward by an expanding network of regional and country offices, located principally in developing countries. The World Conservation Union builds on the strengths of its members, networks and partners to enhance their capacity and to support global alliances to safeguard natural resources at local, regional and global levels. The Live Bird Trade in Tanzania Proceedings of a Workshop held in December 1991 N. Leader-Williams and R. K. Tibanyenda Editors Planning and Assessment for Wildlife Management Department of Wildlife Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) No. 16 IUCN –The World Conservation Union 1996 The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of lUCN or other participating organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of lUCN or other participating organizations. This publication has been made possible by funding from the Planning and Assessment for Wildlife Management project, donated by USAID and managed by the African Wildlife Foundation and WWF Tanzania Office. Published by: lUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK lUCN The World Conservation Union Copyright: (1996) International Union for Conservation of Natare and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Leader-Williams, N. and Tibanyenda, R.K. (Eds.) 1996. The Live Bird Trade in Tanzania, lUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, United Kingdom. ix + 131pp. ISBN: 2-8317-0365-4 Cover design by: lUCN Publications Services Unit Cover drawing: Jomo Kitandu Layout by: Nigel Leader-Williams Produced by: lUCN Publications Services Unit Printed by: Page Brothers (Norwich) Ltd, Norwich, UK Available from: lUCN Publications Services Unit 219c Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 0DL, United Kingdom Tel: ++44 1223 277894, Fax: ++44 1223 277175 E-mail: [email protected] www: http://www.iucn.org A catalogue of lUCN publications is also available The text of this book is printed on Fineblade Cartridge 90 gsm made from low-chlorine pulp CONTENTS PREFACE N. Leader-Williams and R.K. Tibanyenda vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS viii OPENING OF THE WORKSHOP Tanzania's Bird Trade Workshop N.N. Kitomari 1 PART 1: PRESENTATIONS 3 1 A global overview of the wild bird trade T.A. Mulliken, S.R. Broad and J.B. Thomsen 5 2 CITES and the trade in wild-caught birds T.Milliken 26 3 Perceptions and management of the wild bird trade in the United Republic of Tanzania S.R. Edwards and S.R. Broad 31 4 Tanzanian bird trade: the traders' perspective Tanzania Wildlife Exporter's Association 48 5 The bird trade in Tanzania: the quota system N.E. Baker 49 6 Mortality in Tanzania's bird trade K.M.Howell 63 7 The bird trade in Tanzania: problems and future outlook Planning and Assessment for Wildlife Management 68 8 A management framework for the wild bird trade S.R. Edwards and J.B. Thomsen 82 PART 2: WORKING GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS 101 Group 1: Biological monitoring 103 Group 2: Management and trade control 106 Group 3: Benefits and economics 108 Group 4: Animal welfare 110 PART 3: OUTCOME OF THE WORKSHOP 113 Policy for management of Tanzania's avifauna, with special reference to the live bird trade 115 Management plan for Tanzania's avifauna, with special reference to the live bird trade 116 The revised bird quota for 1994 121 LIST OF ATTENDEES 131 V PREFACE Tanzania has long been recognised for its outstanding avifauna. This reputation arises from the great variety of species found in Tanzania, and the number of endemic species that are restricted to Tanzania, for whose future conservation Tanzania is solely responsible. Among the total of 1060 bird species now recorded in Tanzania, at least 19 species or sub-species are endemic to Tanzania alone, while a further 16 species are endemic to East Africa. Taking pride of place among the Tanzanian endemics is the genus of bird new to science, and discovered only in 1992, Xenoperdix the Udzungwa partridge, whose closest living relative is the Indian hill partridge. The discovery of this genus in Udzungwa Mountains has added further to their endemic avifauna. Udzungwa also boasts two other restricted species, including a species of sunbird discovered in 1981, as well as at least six other Tanzanian endemics found in other montane and coastal forest areas. Further restricted endemic species are found in other Eastern Arc montane forests, including the Pares, Usambaras, Ukagurus, Ulugurus, Udzungwas and Southern Highlands. Other Tanzanian endemics have a more widespread distribution throughout drier areas of Acacia- dominated woodland, including a species of starling and two lovebirds. A number of endemic species also occur in various wetlands, for example in the Wembere swamps. Furthermore, two Tanzanian endemics, a species of weaver, and a species of cisticola as yet undescribed to science, occur in the Kilombero Valley. Since the 1960s Tanzania has aimed to conserve her wildlife resources using strategies that include utilisation for the benefit of the people of Tanzania. The practice of maintaining wild birds in captivity extends back several thousand years among peoples of many different regions and cultures. Among their attributes, birds can provide meat, feathers, companionship and beauty. Large numbers of exotic birds have been traded internationally since the mid-nineteenth century. Countries in Africa, Asia, and Central and South America have supplied large numbers of birds to markets in Europe and the United States throughout this century. With improvements in the speed of transport, the volume and diversity of species in trade have increased dramatically. Today the pastime of keeping wild birds for pleasure is common throughout much of the world, giving rise to the international trade in millions of wild birds each year. Among the major suppliers of world markets over at least the last 15 years has been Tanzania, which ranks as the second largest African supplier of wild caught birds behind Senegal. Taken in combination, Senegal and Tanzania have accounted for over two-thirds of the trade in all species listed on the CITES Appendices during the late 1980s. Tanzania has utilised wild-caught live birds to supply world markets, under strategies that promote conservation both through protection and a wide range of utilisation options. The apparently increasing scale of the trade in live birds from Tanzania and other source countries, including Senegal, Indonesia, Argentina and Guyana, has been causing increasing international concern. At the same time, ornithologists and conservationists within Tanzania raised their own similar concerns about the bird trade. These concerns arose for a number of different reasons during the 1980s and early 1990s. These reasons include the following: whether the present offtake, particularly for parrots and parrot-like species, are set at sustainable harvest levels; whether the standards of animal welfare employed in the trade are adequate; whether the economic structure of the bird trade results in any benefits for conservation, either of the species themselves or of their habitats; and, the large illegal component of the trade. This attention brought recognition that the lack of any coherent policy guidelines to guide the conservation and utilisation of live birds was a major gap in Tanzania. Furthermore, little information has been available to judge the scale and value of the trade in live birds from Tanzania. Indeed, the lack of policies and plans, and the lack of data, throughout Tanzania's wildlife sector was realised in 1990 when the Planning and Assessment for Wildlife Management (PAWM) project was initiated. PAWM was given broad terms of reference, among which were included the brief to tackle the current key planning issues and to draw up national plans for the wildlife sector; and to organise a more efficient, workable system of information storage and retrieval. The goal of the overall programme of PAWM was to conserve the wildlife of Tanzania by promoting the sustainable economic development of the wildlife sector. A workshop on the live bird trade in Tanzania was designed as part of PAWM's programme of work, and was held in Dar es Salaam during December 1991.
Recommended publications
  • AMANI NATURE RESERVE an Introduction
    Field Guides AMANI NATURE RESERVE an introduction This guide was developed to help participants on Tropical Biology Association field courses to learn about the Amani Nature Reserve and the forests of the East Usambara Mountains. It includes an introduction to the East Usambaras and describes the ecology, flora and fauna of the area. The history of management and conservation of the Amani Nature Reserve, together with its current status, is outlined. This publication was funded by the European Commission (B7-6200/01/0370/ENV). For any queries concerning this document please contact: Tropical Biology Association Department of Zoology Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1223 336619 e-mail: [email protected] © Tropical Biology Association 2007 A Banson production Printed by Swaingrove Field Guides AMANI NATURE RESERVE an introduction TBA Field Guide CONTENTS EAST USAMBARA MOUNTAINS 3 Geographical history 3 Flora and fauna of the Usambara Mountains 3 Human impacts 3 History of Amani 5 History of Amani Botanical Garden 5 FLORA OF THE EASTERN USAMBARAS & AMANI 6 Vegetation cover of the East Usambara Mountains 6 Endemic plants in Amani 7 Introduced (alien and invasive) species 7 Case study of an introduced species: Maesopsis eminii (Rhamnaceae) 8 FAUNA OF AMANI 9 Vertebrates 9 Invertebrates 13 MANAGEMENT OF AMANI NATURE RESERVE 14 Conservation 14 REFERENCES 16 2 Amani Nature Reserve EAST USAMBARA MOUNTAINS An overview Geographical history The Amani Nature Reserve is located in the East Usambara region. This is part of the Eastern Arc Mountains, an isolated mountain chain of ancient crystalline rock formed through a cycle of block faulting and erosion that stretches from the Taita Hills in Kenya down to the Southern Highlands in Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List (Note, There Was a Pre-Tour to Kenya in 2018 As in 2017, but These Species Were Not Recorded
    Tanzania Species List (Note, there was a pre-tour to Kenya in 2018 as in 2017, but these species were not recorded. You can find a Kenya list with the fully annotated 2017 Species List for reference) February 6-18, 2018 Guides: Preston Mutinda and Peg Abbott, Driver/guides William Laiser and John Shoo, and 6 participants: Rob & Anita, Susan and Jan, and Bob and Joan KEYS FOR THIS LIST The # in (#) is the number of days the species was seen on the tour (E) – endemic BIRDS STRUTHIONIDAE: OSTRICHES OSTRICH Struthio camelus massaicus – (8) ANATIDAE: DUCKS & GEESE WHITE-FACED WHISTLING-DUCK Dendrocygna viduata – (2) FULVOUS WHISTLING-DUCK Dendrocygna bicolor – (1) COMB DUCK Sarkidiornis melanotos – (1) EGYPTIAN GOOSE Alopochen aegyptiaca – (12) SPUR-WINGED GOOSE Plectropterus gambensis – (2) RED-BILLED DUCK Anas erythrorhyncha – (4) HOTTENTOT TEAL Anas hottentota – (2) CAPE TEAL Anas capensis – (2) NUMIDIDAE: GUINEAFOWL HELMETED GUINEAFOWL Numida meleagris – (12) PHASIANIDAE: PHEASANTS, GROUSE, AND ALLIES COQUI FRANCOLIN Francolinus coqui – (2) CRESTED FRANCOLIN Francolinus sephaena – (2) HILDEBRANDT'S FRANCOLIN Francolinus hildebrandti – (3) Naturalist Journeys [email protected] 866.900.1146 / Caligo Ventures [email protected] 800.426.7781 naturalistjourneys.com / caligo.com P.O. Box 16545 Portal AZ 85632 FAX: 650.471.7667 YELLOW-NECKED FRANCOLIN Francolinus leucoscepus – (4) [E] GRAY-BREASTED FRANCOLIN Francolinus rufopictus – (4) RED-NECKED FRANCOLIN Francolinus afer – (2) LITTLE GREBE Tachybaptus ruficollis – (1) PHOENICOPTERIDAE:FLAMINGOS
    [Show full text]
  • Results of the January 2018 Waterbird Counts in Kenya Covering the Rift Valley, Nairobi, Central, Coast, Amboseli and Yala Swamp
    The NATIONAL MUSEUMS of KENYA January 2018 Waterbird Count Results in the Rift Valley, Nairobi, Central, Coast, Amboseli and Yala Swamp Oliver Nasirwa, Paul Mungai, Fleur Ng’weno, Lennox Kirao, Edwin Gichohi, Dominic Chesire, Timothy Ikime and Fred Barasa CENTRE FOR BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH REPORTS: ORNITHOLOGY NO. 83, MARCH 2018 Supported by: 1 Results of the January 2018 waterbird counts in Kenya covering the Rift Valley, Nairobi, Central, Coast, Amboseli and Yala Swamp. January 2018 Waterbird Count Results in the Rift Valley, Nairobi, Central, Coast, Amboseli and Yala Swamp Oliver Nasirwa1, Paul Mungai2, Fleur Ng’weno3, Lennox Kirao4, Edwin Gichohi1, Dominic Chesire1, Timothy Ikime and Fred Barasa3 1National Museums of Kenya, PO Box 40658-00100, Nairobi, Kenya, [email protected]; 2Kenya Wildlife Service, PO Box 20241–00100, Nairobi, Kenya, [email protected]; 3Nature Kenya (EANHS), PO Box 44486- 00100, Nairobi, Kenya, [email protected]; 4A Rocha Kenya, PO Box 383–80202, Watamu, Kenya, [email protected]. Summary Waterbird counts were carried out in 48 sites across Kenya during the months of January and February 2018. A total of 294,950 individuals of 126 waterbird species were recorded. Lake Bogoria had the highest number with 165,852 individuals of 34 waterbird species followed by Lake Nakuru with 23,144 individuals of 73 species and Tana River Delta with 16,143 individuals of 69 species. The highest number of waterbird species was recorded at Lake Nakuru with 73 species, followed by Lake Ol’Bolossat with 72 species and Lake Naivasha with 71 species. The most abundant species was Lesser Flamingo Phoeniconaias minor with 163,164 individuals followed by Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus ruber with 14,155 and Little Stint Calidris minuta with 11,401.
    [Show full text]
  • RATES of KARYOTYPIC EVOLUTION in ESTRILDID FINCHES DIFFER BETWEEN 4 ISLAND and CONTINENTAL CLADES 5 6 Daniel M
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/013987; this version posted January 19, 2015. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 1 2 3 RATES OF KARYOTYPIC EVOLUTION IN ESTRILDID FINCHES DIFFER BETWEEN 4 ISLAND AND CONTINENTAL CLADES 5 6 Daniel M. Hooper1,2 and Trevor D. Price3 7 8 1Commitee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 9 2 E-mail: [email protected] 10 3Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 11 12 13 Sunday, January 18, 2015 14 15 16 Running head: Chromosome inversions in finches 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/013987; this version posted January 19, 2015. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 2 35 Reasons why chromosomal rearrangements spread to fixation and frequently distinguish 36 related taxa remain poorly understood. We used cytological descriptions of karyotype to 37 identify large pericentric inversions between species of Estrildid finches (family 38 Estrildidae) and a time-dated phylogeny to assess the genomic, geographic, and 39 phylogenetic context of karyotype evolution in this group.
    [Show full text]
  • Malawi Trip Report 12Th to 28Th September 2014
    Malawi Trip Report 12th to 28th September 2014 Bohm’s Bee-eater by Keith Valentine Trip Report compiled by Tour Leader: Keith Valentine RBT Malawi Trip Report September 2014 2 Top 10 Birds: 1. Scarlet-tufted Sunbird 2. Pel’s Fishing Owl 3. Lesser Seedcracker 4. Thyolo Alethe 5. White-winged Apalis 6. Racket-tailed Roller 7. Blue Swallow 8. Bohm’s Flycatcher 9. Babbling Starling 10. Bohm’s Bee-eater/Yellow-throated Apalis Top 5 Mammals: 1. African Civet 2. Four-toed Elephant Shrew 3. Sable Antelope 4. Bush Pig 5. Side-striped Jackal/Greater Galago/Roan Antelope/Blotched Genet Trip Summary This was our first ever fully comprehensive tour to Malawi and was quite simply a fantastic experience in all respects. For starters, many of the accommodations are of excellent quality and are also situated in prime birding locations with a large number of the area’s major birding targets found in close proximity. The food is generally very good and the stores and lodges are for the most part stocked with decent beer and a fair selection of South African wine. However, it is the habitat diversity that is largely what makes Malawi so good from a birding point of view. Even though it is a small country, this good variety of habitat, and infrastructure that allows access to these key zones, insures that the list of specials is long and attractive. Our tour was extremely successful in locating the vast majority of the region’s most wanted birds and highlights included Red-winged Francolin, White-backed Night Heron, African Cuckoo-Hawk, Western Banded Snake
    [Show full text]
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • Harrier References
    Introduction This is the final version of the Harrier's list, no further updates will be made. Grateful thanks to Wietze Janse and Tom Shevlin (www.irishbirds.ie) for the cover images and all those who responded with constructive feedback. All images © the photographers. Please note that this and other Reference Lists I have compiled are not exhaustive and are best employed in conjunction with other sources. Joe Hobbs Index The general order of species follows the International Ornithologists' Union World Bird List (Gill, F. & Donsker, D. (eds.) 2019. IOC World Bird List. Available from: https://www.worldbirdnames.org/ [version 9.1 accessed January 2019]). Final Version Version 1.4 (January 2019). Cover Main image: Western Marsh Harrier. Zevenhoven, Groene Jonker, Netherlands. 3rd May 2011. Picture by Wietze Janse. Vignette: Montagu’s Harrier. Great Saltee Island, Co. Wexford, Ireland. 10th May 2008. Picture by Tom Shevlin. Species Page No. African Marsh Harrier [Circus ranivorus] 8 Black Harrier [Circus maurus] 10 Cinereous Harrier [Circus cinereus] 17 Eastern Marsh Harrier [Circus spilonotus] 6 Hen Harrier [Circus cyaneus] 11 Long-winged Harrier [Circus buffoni] 9 Malagasy Harrier [Circus macrosceles] 9 Montagu's Harrier [Circus pygargus] 20 Northern Harrier [Circus hudsonius] 16 Pallid Harrier [Circus macrourus] 18 Papuan Harrier [Circus spilothorax] 7 Pied Harrier [Circus melanoleucos] 20 Réunion Harrier [Circus maillardi] 9 Spotted Harrier [Circus assimilis] 9 Swamp Harrier [Circus approximans] 7 Western Marsh Harrier [Circus aeruginosus] 4 1 Relevant Publications Balmer, D. et al. 2013. Bird Atlas 2001-11: The breeding and wintering birds of Britain and Ireland. BTO Books, Thetford. Beaman, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Chewing Lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) from Estrildid Finches (Aves
    Zootaxa 2714: 59–68 (2010) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2010 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Chewing lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) from estrildid finches (Aves: Passeriformes: Estrildidae) and louse-flies (Insecta: Diptera: Hippoboscidae) from birds in Senegal, with descriptions of three new species of the genus Brueelia OLDŘICH SYCHRA1,3, IVAN LITERÁK1, TOMÁŠ NAJER1, MIROSLAV ČAPEK2, PETR KOUBEK2 & PETR PROCHÁZKA2 1Department of Biology and Wildlife Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Palackého 1–3, 612 42 Brno, Czech Republic 2Institute of Vertebrate Biology Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Květná 8, 603 65 Brno, Czech Republic 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Descriptions and illustrations are given for three new species of the genus Brueelia Kéler from estrildid finches (Estrildidae) from Senegal. They and their type hosts are: B. fasciata from Amadina fasciata, B. senegala from Lagonosticta senegala and B. cantans from Euodice cantans. Records of three other louse species of the genus Myrsidea Waterston from estrildid finches and records of louse-flies (Hippoboscidae) from birds in Senegal are also given. Key words: Brueelia, Chewing lice, Estrildidae, Hippoboscidae, louse-flies, Myrsidea, Passeriformes, Phthiraptera, Senegal Introduction The family Estrildidae comprising waxbills, munias and allies represents a relatively large family of passerine birds. About 141 species of these gregarious and often colonial seed-eaters are distributed in the Old World tropics and Australasia, of which 23 occur in Senegal (Fry & Keith 2004, Lepage 2009, according to taxonomy in Clements 2007). Data concerning records of chewing lice from Senegalese Estrildidae are scarce.
    [Show full text]
  • An Update of Wallacels Zoogeographic Regions of the World
    REPORTS To examine the temporal profile of ChC produc- specification of a distinct, and probably the last, 3. G. A. Ascoli et al., Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 557 (2008). tion and their correlation to laminar deployment, cohort in this lineage—the ChCs. 4. J. Szentágothai, M. A. Arbib, Neurosci. Res. Program Bull. 12, 305 (1974). we injected a single pulse of BrdU into pregnant A recent study demonstrated that progeni- CreER 5. P. Somogyi, Brain Res. 136, 345 (1977). Nkx2.1 ;Ai9 females at successive days be- tors below the ventral wall of the lateral ventricle 6. L. Sussel, O. Marin, S. Kimura, J. L. Rubenstein, tween E15 and P1 to label mitotic progenitors, (i.e., VGZ) of human infants give rise to a medial Development 126, 3359 (1999). each paired with a pulse of tamoxifen at E17 to migratory stream destined to the ventral mPFC 7. S. J. Butt et al., Neuron 59, 722 (2008). + 18 8. H. Taniguchi et al., Neuron 71, 995 (2011). label NKX2.1 cells (Fig. 3A). We first quanti- ( ). Despite species differences in the develop- 9. L. Madisen et al., Nat. Neurosci. 13, 133 (2010). fied the fraction of L2 ChCs (identified by mor- mental timing of corticogenesis, this study and 10. J. Szabadics et al., Science 311, 233 (2006). + phology) in mPFC that were also BrdU+. Although our findings raise the possibility that the NKX2.1 11. A. Woodruff, Q. Xu, S. A. Anderson, R. Yuste, Front. there was ChC production by E15, consistent progenitors in VGZ and their extended neurogenesis Neural Circuits 3, 15 (2009).
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds of the Dar Es Salaam Area, Tanzania
    Le Gerfaut, 77 : 205–258 (1987) BIRDS OF THE DAR ES SALAAM AREA, TANZANIA W.G. Harvey and KM. Howell INTRODUCTION Although the birds of other areas in Tanzania have been studied in detail, those of the coast near Dar es Salaam have received relatively little recent attention. Ruggles-Brise (1927) published a popular account of some species from Dar es Salaam, and Fuggles-Couchman (1939,1951, 1953, 1954, 1962) included the area in a series of papers of a wider scope. More recently there have been a few other stu­ dies dealing with particular localities (Gardiner and Gardiner 1971), habitats (Stuart and van der Willigen 1979; Howell 1981), or with individual species or groups (Harvey 1971–1975; Howell 1973, 1977). Britton (1978, 1981) has docu­ mented specimens collected in the area previous to 1967 by Anderson and others. The purpose of this paper is to draw together data from published reports, unpu­ blished records, museum specimens and our own observations on the frequency, habitat, distribution and breeding of the birds of the Dar es Salaam area, here defi­ ned as the portion of the mainland within a 64-km radius of Dar es Salaam, inclu­ ding the small islands just offshore (Fig. 1). It includes Dar es Salaam District and portions of two others, Kisarawe and Bagamoyo. Zanzibar has been omitted because its unusual avifauna has been reviewed (Pakenham 1979). Most of the mainland areas are readily accessible from Dar es Salaam by road and the small islands may be reached by boat. The geography of the area is described in Sutton (1970).
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinated Monitoring of the Endangered Spotted Ground Thrush in the East African Breeding and Non-Breeding Grounds
    CEPF SMALL GRANT FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT I. BASIC DATA Organization Legal Name: BirdLife International Project Title (as stated in the grant agreement): Coordinated Monitoring of the Endangered Spotted Ground Thrush in the East African Breeding and Non-breeding Grounds Implementation Partners for This Project: Wildlife Conservation Society of Tanzania, Nature Kenya, A Rocha Kenya, individual contributors of basic data Project Dates (as stated in the grant agreement): March 1, 2007 - December 31, 2008 Date of Report (month/year): February 2009 II. OPENING REMARKS Provide any opening remarks that may assist in the review of this report. Spotted Ground Thrush Zoothera guttata is an endemic resident and intra-African migrant bird species. The species is classified as Endangered. Although the species can be found in seven African countries (DRC, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania), Z. g. fischeri, one of the five recognised races of the species, is confined to and migrates within the coastal forests of Kenya and Tanzania. Recent records from Rondo Plateau in the coastal forests of Lindi District in Tanzania indicate that Z. g. fischeri breeds in southern Tanzania coastal forests. It is known as a non-breeding visitor to forests on the Kenya coast and north- eastern Tanzania from Lamu to Pugu Hills. Since the bird is a cross-border species it is particularly difficult to conserve and requires concerted action. In response to this challenge, BirdLife International developed an International Action Plan for the species and further translated it into the national contexts for Kenya and Tanzania using participative stakeholder workshops. In all the three action plans, it is recognised that limited knowledge about the species distribution, movement and population size is a critical problem hindering its conservation, especially in East Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Miombo Ecoregion Vision Report
    MIOMBO ECOREGION VISION REPORT Jonathan Timberlake & Emmanuel Chidumayo December 2001 (published 2011) Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 20 WWF - SARPO MIOMBO ECOREGION VISION REPORT 2001 (revised August 2011) by Jonathan Timberlake & Emmanuel Chidumayo Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 20 Biodiversity Foundation for Africa P.O. Box FM730, Famona, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe PREFACE The Miombo Ecoregion Vision Report was commissioned in 2001 by the Southern Africa Regional Programme Office of the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF SARPO). It represented the culmination of an ecoregion reconnaissance process led by Bruce Byers (see Byers 2001a, 2001b), followed by an ecoregion-scale mapping process of taxa and areas of interest or importance for various ecological and bio-physical parameters. The report was then used as a basis for more detailed discussions during a series of national workshops held across the region in the early part of 2002. The main purpose of the reconnaissance and visioning process was to initially outline the bio-physical extent and properties of the so-called Miombo Ecoregion (in practice, a collection of smaller previously described ecoregions), to identify the main areas of potential conservation interest and to identify appropriate activities and areas for conservation action. The outline and some features of the Miombo Ecoregion (later termed the Miombo– Mopane Ecoregion by Conservation International, or the Miombo–Mopane Woodlands and Grasslands) are often mentioned (e.g. Burgess et al. 2004). However, apart from two booklets (WWF SARPO 2001, 2003), few details or justifications are publically available, although a modified outline can be found in Frost, Timberlake & Chidumayo (2002). Over the years numerous requests have been made to use and refer to the original document and maps, which had only very restricted distribution.
    [Show full text]