DOCSLIB.ORG

Flagstaff Water History, Mormon Lake and Anderson Mesa, 1958-1974 Descript: 1 Box, 5 Linear In. I. Folder: City of Flagstaff

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flagstaff Water History, Mormon Lake and Anderson Mesa, 1958-1974 Descript: 1 Box, 5 Linear In. I. Folder: City of Flagstaff Flagstaff Water History, Mormon Lake and Anderson Mesa, 1958-1974 Descript: 1 box, 5 linear in. I. Folder: City of Flagstaff application to obtain water rights to Mormon Lake, 1958 Notice of Application by the City of Flagstaff to the Arizona State Land Department to appropriate water from Mormon Lake for the municipal water supply, dated July 25, 1958. 1 sheet Letter from Donald LeMaster, Water Division, Arizona State Land Department, Phoenix, Arizona, to the City of Flagstaff, August 8, 1958, with the inclusion of two protest letters concerning the Mormon Lake water application made by the City of Flagstaff; letters are from Belle Butler and L.E. Matteson. 4 pages Letter from Donald LeMaster, Water Division, Arizona State Land Department, Phoenix, Arizona, to the City of Flagstaff, August 11, 1958, with the inclusion of four protest letters concerning the Mormon Lake water application made by the City of Flagstaff; letters are from F. Drew Morey, Bonnie Voreige(?), Marie Tombler, and M.L. Thornbury. 6 pages Letter from Donald LeMaster, Water Division, Arizona State Land Department, Phoenix, Arizona, to the City of Flagstaff, August 12, 1958, with the inclusion of five protest letters concerning the Mormon Lake water application made by the City of Flagstaff; letters are from Mrs. J.C. Jayne, Ralph Dixon, Arthur Meinhardt, Pilgrim Playground, V.R. Beauchemin, and Herman and Bertha Fricke. 6 pages Letter from Donald LeMaster, Water Division, Arizona State Land Department, Phoenix, Arizona, to the City of Flagstaff, August 13, 1958, with the inclusion of three protest letters concerning the Mormon Lake water application made by the City of Flagstaff; letters are from Robert Sues, Mrs. Robert Sues, and Hazel Carter, Montezuma Lodge Store. 4 pages Letter from Donald LeMaster, Water Division, Arizona State Land Department, Phoenix, Arizona, to the City of Flagstaff, August 14, 1958, with the inclusion of three protest letters concerning the Mormon Lake water application made by the City of Flagstaff; letters are from Everett Luther, Chairman, North Congregational Church, Jesse and Mary McComb, and John Herrscher. 4 pages Letter from Donald LeMaster, Water Division, Arizona State Land Department, Phoenix, Arizona, to the City of Flagstaff, August 19, 1958, with the inclusion of seven protest letters concerning the Mormon Lake water application made by the City of Flagstaff; letters are from John Sandige, V.W. Hawkins, E.H. Caldwell, N.C. Jackson, E.L. Caldwell, Encanto Community Church, and D.L. Keck, Camp Manager of Pilgrim Playground. 9 pages Letter from Donald LeMaster, Water Division, Arizona State Land Department, Phoenix, Arizona, to the City of Flagstaff, August 22, 1958, with the inclusion of twenty-three protest letters concerning the Mormon lake water application made by the City of Flagstaff; letters are from Walter Germann, Ronald Wood, Harold and Mary Mitchell, Don Oliver, Louis and Beatrice Larson, Trinity Congregational Church, Philip Corley, Dorothy and John Robbins, Virginia and R.M. Hess, J.B. Matz, Laurel and Robert Brown, Dr. and Mrs. K.E. Steninger, a petition of sixty-nine signatures from property owners at Mormon Lake, Harvey Zorn, Mr. and Mrs. Benjamin Dickson, Ralph and Miriam Phillips, J. Ford Forsyth, L. L. Hammond, Mrs. Paul Volken, Mrs. Neil Anderson, Pink E. Lewis, Mrs. Wendell Shultz, and Leo(?) Garruth. 25 pages Letter from C.P. Niles, Flagstaff, to Platt Cline, Editor of the Arizona Daily Sun, Flagstaff, August 22, 1958, protesting the City of Flagstaff’s desire to use water from Mormon Lake. 2 pages Letter from R.J. Smith, Director, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix, Arizona, to Charles Saunders, Mayor of Flagstaff, August 26, 1958, urging the city to consider the recreational and economic benefits provided by Upper Lake Mary and Mormon Lake. He proposed the city consider the advisability of stipulating that after any diversion of water is made from Mormon Lake into Upper Lake Mary, an adequate water depth be maintained in Upper Lake Mary to permit a continuance of fisheries management each year as an aid in maintaining the recreational potential of the Flagstaff area. 2 pages Letter from Donald LeMaster, Water Division, Arizona State Land Department, to Mangum and Christensen, Attorneys at Law, Flagstaff, Arizona, September 22, 1958, granting a 60-day extension within which to reply to protests of the City of Flagstaff application for Mormon Lake water use. 1 page Letter from Jane Burns, Coconino County Board of Supervisors, to the Flagstaff City Council, September 26, 1958, enclosing a Resolution passed by the Coconino County Board of Supervisors at their September 2, 1958 meeting; copy of the Resolution in opposition to the City of Flagstaff’s application to divert water from Mormon Lake for municipal water use. 1 page, 2 pages II. Application permits to appropriate public waters of the State of Arizona for the City of Flagstaff, from water sources on Anderson Mesa and adjacent Little Colorado River watershed, August 17 and November 21, 1972. Thirty-six applications to divert water from thirty-four lakes and two tanks located on Anderson Mesa, to Lake Mary by gravity flow through various canals. The water sources are deemed tributaries of the Little Colorado River watershed, on Coconino National Forest land. The applications were withdrawn May 17, 1974. III. Supporting documentation for the Anderson Mesa water use application permits, 1972. U.S. Supreme Court Reports, State of Arizona vs State of California, reargued November 13-14, 1962, decided June 3, 1963, in regards to how much water each state has a legal right to use from the Colorado River and its tributaries. 5 pages Labor Standards Act, Federal Power Commission vs State of Oregon, Oregon State Game Commission in which the Commission granted a license for a power project to use non-navigable waters located on a federal reservation within Oregon. The Court of Appeals set aside the Commission’s order on the ground that Congress, by its public lands legislation, had transferred to the state such control over the use of non-navigable waters. The Supreme Court reversed the court below, taking the view that federal public lands legislation was inapplicable to reserved lands of the kind involved in the instant case, and that the Commission’s grant of the license was within the power and discretion vested in it by the Federal Power Act. 16 pages Federal Statutes: Chapter II Forest Service, Title 36 - Parks, Forests, and Memorials. Part 231 – Grazing: 231.3 Applications and permits, 231.4. Grazing preferences, and 231.9 Applications and permits, grazing preferences, and range improvements, are highlighted. 4 pages Federal Statutes: Chapter II National Forests, Establishment, Administration. Part 473 Revocation, modification, or vacation of orders or proclamations establishing national forests; Part 475 Purposes for which national forests may be established and administered; and Part 481Use of waters, are highlighted. 4 pages U.S. Supreme Court Reports, United States vs Grand River Dam Authority, argued May 17, 1960, decided June 13, 1960, in relation to developing hydroelectric power on the Grand River. 6 pages Handwritten notes on yellow legal pad paper referring to water appropriation within Arizona Statutes [sic]. 3 sheets Anderson Mesa Water Appropriation, City of Flagstaff: hand drawn picture on graph paper showing location of lakes on Anderson Mesa with township and range designations, and section numbers. Includes a handwritten description sheet listing township and range numbers. 1 large folded sheet, undated; 1 sheet yellow legal paper Application for a permit to appropriate public waters of the State of Arizona and/or to construct a reservoir and store water for beneficial use, made by the City of Flagstaff, signed by Leland McPherson, City Manager, City of Flagstaff, undated, 2 copies. Includes township and range numbers for each lake listed on yellow legal paper. 8 sheets Map of Anderson Mesa Addition Lake Sites, Watersheds, and Proposed Pipeline Route, Plate 6, Tremaine-Soldier Annex Feasibility Study by John Carollo Engineers, Phoenix, Arizona, shows lakes and tanks within township and range sections and includes the proposed pipeline routes to Upper Lake Mary. 1 sheet, 2 copies Lower Lake Mary, Arizona, United States, Department of the Interior, Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Series Topographic map, 1962. 1 large sheet, 2 copies Typed list of water wells in the Winslow area, with elevations. Undated. 1 sheet IV. Correspondence, protests, and applications to appropriate public waters from the State of Arizona for the City of Flagstaff from water sources on Anderson Mesa and adjacent Little Colorado River watershed, 1972-1974. Letter from Fred Croxen, City Attorney, to the Water and Mineral Resources Division, Water State Land Department, Phoenix, Arizona, July 26, 1972 concerning 23 applications for a permit to appropriate water by the City of Flagstaff. 1 page Letter from Wm. Joe Melling, Director Water Rights Division, Arizona State Land Department, Phoenix, Arizona, to Fred Croxen, City Attorney, City of Flagstaff, August 3, 1972, concerning a telephone conversation in regard to the 23 applications for a permit to appropriate public waters of the State of Arizona. The applications were returned to the city because they needed to be submitted in duplicate on the printed application forms. 1 page Letter from Fred Croxen, City Attorney, to Wm. Joe Melling, Director Water Rights Division, Arizona State Land Department, Phoenix, Arizona, August 15, 1972, concerning the applications. 1 page Letters from Wm. Joe Melling, Water Rights Division, Arizona State Land Department, Phoenix, Arizona, November 3, 1972, concerning notices to be posted of applications No. A-4975 throughA-4991 to appropriate public waters on Anderson Mesa: Cecile Lake, Post Lake, Pickett Lake, Kathleen Lake, Indian Lake, Ashurst Lake, Lois Lake, Deep Lake, Potato Lake, McCormick Lake, Jolene Lake, Horse Lake, Als Lake, Beth Lake, Ashurst Run Lake, Little Dry Lake, Marshall Lake, Prime Lake, Fisher/Fry Lake, Edith Lake, Vail Lake, Cynthia Lake, and Campbell/Francis Lake.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arizona Fishing Regulations 3 Fishing License Fees Getting Started
    2019 & 2020 Fishing Regulations for your boat for your boat See how much you could savegeico.com on boat | 1-800-865-4846insurance. | Local Offi ce geico.com | 1-800-865-4846 | Local Offi ce See how much you could save on boat insurance. Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states or all GEICO companies. Boat and PWC coverages are underwritten by GEICO Marine Insurance Company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, D.C. 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. TowBoatU.S. is the preferred towing service provider for GEICO Marine Insurance. The GEICO Gecko Image © 1999-2017. © 2017 GEICO AdPages2019.indd 2 12/4/2018 1:14:48 PM AdPages2019.indd 3 12/4/2018 1:17:19 PM Table of Contents Getting Started License Information and Fees ..........................................3 Douglas A. Ducey Governor Regulation Changes ...........................................................4 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH COMMISSION How to Use This Booklet ...................................................5 JAMES S. ZIELER, CHAIR — St. Johns ERIC S. SPARKS — Tucson General Statewide Fishing Regulations KURT R. DAVIS — Phoenix LELAND S. “BILL” BRAKE — Elgin Bag and Possession Limits ................................................6 JAMES R. AMMONS — Yuma Statewide Fishing Regulations ..........................................7 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT Common Violations ...........................................................8 5000 W. Carefree Highway Live Baitfish
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior U.S
    United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 FAX: (602) 242-2513 In Reply Refer To: AESO/SE 22410-2003-F-0430 April 1, 2008 To: Regional Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico (Attn: L. Roberts) From: Field Supervisor Subject: Intra-Service Biological and Conference Opinion - Issuance of a Section 10(a)(1)(B) Permit to Salt River Project for Incidental Take of Threatened and Endangered Species Associated With Operation of Horseshoe and Bartlett Reservoirs This biological and conference opinion responds to the request for consultation with the Arizona Ecological Services Office pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544), as amended (Act). At issue are impacts that may result from issuance of a permit in accordance with section 10(a)(1)(B) (permit) of the Act for incidental take of threatened and endangered species associated with operation of Horseshoe and Bartlett dams and reservoirs by Salt River Project (SRP) in Maricopa and Yavapai counties, Arizona. Issuance of the permit may affect the endangered southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) (flycatcher) and its critical habitat, the threatened bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), the threatened spikedace (Meda fulgida), the threatened loach minnow (Tiaroga cobitis), the endangered razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) and its critical habitat, the endangered Gila topminnow (Poeciliopsis occidentalis),
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona, Pre 1930, White Border Post Card Collection Section 3
    Arizona, Pre 1930, White Border Post Card Collection Section 3 — D to F By Al Ring Early and Pre 1930, White Border: (Around 1898 to 1930) Pioneer Era (Pre 1898) — Most pre-1898 postcards share a few common traits: The postcard of this era is characterized by an undivided back (no line going down the center of the back of the postcard), and many con- tain printed lines on the back for the name of the addressee and his address only. Private Mailing Card Era (1898 to December 24, 1901) — On May 19, 1898, by an act of Congress, private printers were granted permission to print and sell cards that bore the inscription “Private Mailing card.” Cost of postage reduced from 2 cents to 1 cent. Undivided Back “Postcard” Era (December 24, 1901 to March 1, 1907) — The use of the word “POST CARD/POSTCARD” (as one or two words) was granted by the government to private printers. Writing was still not permitted on the address side. Divided Back Era (March 1, 1907 to 1915) (Golden Age) —Postcards with a divided back were finally permit- ted on March 1, 1907. The address had to be written on the right side of the back of the postcard while the left side was reserved for writing messages. White Border Era (1915-1930) —After WWI printers of view postcards, to save ink, a white border was left around the view, thus we call them “White Border” postcards. The higher cost of post-war publishing com- bined with inexperienced labor caused the production of poorer quality cards.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Game and Fish Commission Rules
    NATURAL RESOURCES 54 Arizona Game and Fish Commission Rules The rules contained in this publication are printed as supplied to LexisNexis by the Arizona Office of Secretary of State. TITLE 12 Section R12-4-210. Repealed NATURAL RESOURCES R12-4-211. Repealed R12-4-212. Repealed R12-4-213. Repealed CHAPTER 4 R12-4-214. Repealed R12-4-215. Tournament Fishing Permit Regulations GAME AND FISH COMMISSION R12-4-216. Crossbow Permit (Authority: A.R.S. § 17-201 et seq.) R12-4-217. Challenged Hunters Access/Mobility Permit R12-4-218. Repealed ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL R12-4-219. Renumbered PROVISIONS R12-4-220. Repealed Section ARTICLE 3. TAKING AND HANDLING OF R12-4-101. Definitions WILDLIFE R12-4-102. Fees for Licenses, Tags, Stamps, and Permits R12-4-103. Duplicate Tags and Licenses R12-4-301. Restrictions for Taking Wildlife in Maricopa R12-4-104. Application Procedures for Issuance of Hunt Per- County Parks mit-tags by Drawing R12-4-302. Use of Tags R12-4-105. License Dealer’s License R12-4-303. Unlawful Devices and Ammunition R12-4-106. Licensing Time-frames R12-4-304. Lawful Methods for Taking Wild Mammals, Birds, R12-4-107. Bonus Point System and Reptiles R12-4-108. Management Unit Boundaries R12-4-305. Possessing, Transporting, Importing, Exporting, R12-4-109. Repealed and Selling Carcasses or Parts of Wildlife R12-4-110. Posting and access to state land R12-4-306. Buffalo Hunt Requirements R12-4-111. Identification Number R12-4-307. Trapping Regulations: Licensing; Methods; Tag- R12-4-112. Diseased or injured wildlife ging of Bobcat Pelts R12-4-113.
    [Show full text]
  • The Western Apache Homeland and Archaeology of the Mogollon Rim
    Shí Kéyaa: The Western Apache Homeland and Archaeology of the Mogollon Rim Angie Krall Vincent E. Randall Technical Report No. 2007-03 Desert Archaeology, Inc. Shí Kéyaa: The Western Apache Homeland and Archaeology of the Mogollon Rim Angie Krall Vincent E. Randall Technical Report No. 2007-03 Desert Archaeology, Inc. 3975 N. Tucson Boulevard, Tucson, Arizona 85716 • July 2009 PREFACE The realignment of State Route 260 (SR 260) be- Cores and frontiers depend on vantage point, tween Payson and Heber follows a long tradition however. In this report, KenCairn and Randall ad- of trail blazing through the lands below the Mogol- dress the presumption of the interpretation that lon Rim region. For over 3,000 years, people have described the region as frontier. They examine the passed through the region, perhaps following the region as a homeland and an essential and central route of the modern highway through spring-fed part of the history and identity of Apache, even as meadows and perennial streams. For at least 350 private and public entities have claimed the lands years, the stewards of this land have often been of the Mogollon Rim and native peoples have been Apache and Yavapai. moved to reservations. For modern Apache, the area is a “bridge” be- An extensive view of the Apache use of the tween the modern Yavapai-Apache Nation, Tonto, sub-Mogollon Rim was drawn from published and White Mountain, and San Carlos Reservations. unpublished ethnographic work on Apache places, Tribal members recall trails traveled by foot, don- cultural resource management reports, and the key, horse, or car, as well as camps made under the records of the public agencies who protect and trees, ramadas, or wickiups.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021Welcome Letter
    CELEBRATING 12 YEARS SERVING MUNDS PARK & NORTHERN ARIZONA COMMUNITIES! A FREE COMMUNITY EVENT EVERY SATURDAY! WELCOME BACK! The Pinewood Farmers’ Market (PFM), also known as the “Munds Park Farmers Market,” is held every Saturday, beginning, May 29, 2021 (Memorial Day) through Saturday, September 04, 2021 (Labor Day) from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. The PFM is adjacent to the Munds Park Community Church, which is on the west side of I-17, directly off Munds Ranch Road. The PFM is a free public community market so we ALWAYS invite local Munds Park restaurants, bars, and businesses to participate in the market first prior to bringing outside Flagstaff and/or Valley small businesses into the market. We believe in supporting local businesses and teamwork. The PFM is a unique, outdoor, free market located in the small, quaint resort community called Munds Park, Arizona, which is directly off I-17, Exit 322. At 6,500 feet elevation, Munds Park is generally 20 to 25 degrees cooler than the Valley and a quick jaunt for summer visitors looking to escape the oppressive valley heat. Only 21 miles south of Flagstaff and just under two hours north from the Carefree highway the Munds Park community is nestled alongside the beautiful Coconino National Forest and framed by gorgeous, tall Ponderosa pine trees. Munds Park is widely regarded for its variety of outdoor recreation opportunities in all seasons. One of those recreation opportunities consists of walking or biking down to the local community market and perusing a wide variety of market vendors and artisans each Saturday, which is free to the public and a great opportunity to meet new friends while enjoying local food vendors, artisans, and musicians.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Coconino National Forest Friends, Visitors and Neighbors~
    COCONINO 2009 STAKEHOLDERS REPORT Dear Coconino National Forest ecosystems in Arizona. Together with a broad array of stakeholders, including members of local, Friends, Visitors and Neighbors~ county and state governments, environmental groups, and indus- try representatives, the Forests are working to determine how to collec- 2009 was a year that brought with it many challenges and opportuni- tively accelerate landscape-scale restoration of ponderosa pine forests in ties for the Coconino National Forest. We looked beyond our borders northern Arizona which will involve millions of acres. and worked with diverse partners that helped us manage the forest. We We will also be engaging the public in our continuing efforts to revise welcomed millions of campers, visitors, tourists and recreationists who our Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan), and shape the enjoy their National Forest. future of the forest. Although our Forest Plan has been amended many In our Red Rock Ranger District alone, campground visitation was times since its approval in 1987, we need to take a more comprehensive up 30 percent over last year, and their Visitor Office had a whopping approach to revise our Forest Plan to better address the current and 262,448 visitors, up from 79,229 in 2008 and 61,051 in 2007. Volunteers future needs of the forest and surrounding communities. and partners helped us meet these increased demands. Many more collaborative improvement projects will begin this year Our partnerships have allowed us improve the stewardship of the as a result of federal funds that were awarded to Coconino County in forest, and we are grateful for the synergy that is created from these 2009 under the Secure Rural Schools Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Mormon Lake Quadrangle, Coconino County, Arizona
    GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE MORMON LAKE QUADRANGLE COCONINO COUNTY, ARIZONA by Richard F, Holm Department Of Geology, Northern Arizona University Arizona Geological Survey Contributed Map CM-94-C February 1994 Available from Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, Suite #100, Tucson, Arizona 85701 24 p., 1 sheet, scale 1:24,000 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Arizona Geological Survey standards GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE MORMON LAKE QUADRANGLE, COCONINO COUNTY, ARIZONA Richard F. Holm Department of Geology Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona Introduction The Mormon Lake quadrangle is in the northern part of the Mormon volcanic field, a late Cenozoic volcanic province on the southern margin of the Colorado Plateau (Holm and others, 1989). Except for Pleistocene and Holocene surficial deposits, all of the rocks mapped on the quadrangle are Miocene and Pliocene volcanic rocks. All geologic contacts and faults were traced in the field. Map units were defined on the bases of lithology and morphology, and stratigraphic relationships were determined in the field on the basis of traditional geologic principles such as superposition and cross-cutting relationships. The mapping strategy was to map all lava flows and vent structures that could be distinguished in the field as discrete units, and to trace each flow to its source vent. Each vent structure was given an identification number (see "Vent and flow identification numbers"), and related lava flows were identified with the same number. Small vent deposits and related flows (Tys and Tyb) that lack morphologic distinction on the map were not, however, given separate identification numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brolliar Park Cabin and Homestead
    THE BROLLIAR PARK CABIN AND HOMESTEAD The Flagstaff Ranger District of the Coconino National Forest is developing plans to preserve a log cabin in a meadow known as Brolliar Park. The cabin is located in the NW¼ of Section 20, Township 17 North, Range 9 East, approximately five miles south of Mormon Lake Village in Coconino County, Arizona (Figure 1). Preliminary research by the District Archaeologist indicated that the cabin plus associated improvements and acreage comprised a Forest Homestead patented by Dave Brolliar in 1920 (Haines 2018). The homestead remained in private ownership until 1975 when the USDA Forest Service acquired the property. Prior to starting its preservation work, the District sponsored this study to learn about Brolliar, the homestead, and its subsequent history.1 Primary data sources included: Coconino County deeds, homestead indices, records of livestock marks and brands, bills of sale, mortgages, and promiscuous records; Coconino National Forest cultural resource files, land records, and grazing records; General Land Office patent records; a National Archives & Records Administration/NARA land entry case file; contemporary newspapers (available at Chroniclingamerica.loc.gov and Newspaperarchive.com); vital statistics (usually accessed through Ancestry.com); unpublished manuscripts (archived at Northern Arizona University, the Camp Verde Historical Society, the Sharlot Hall Museum, and the Chanute Public Library); and historical maps and aerial photos (accessed through usgs.gov). Thanks are extended to the individuals who helped access these sources, namely Cindy Dent (Chanute Public Library), Jeremy Haines and Gary Hase (Coconino National Forest), Jan Klann (Camp Verde Historical Society), Octavia Ranger (NARA), and Tom Schmidt (Sharlot Hall Museum).
    [Show full text]
  • Wetland Restoration & Construction Workshop Mormon Lake Ranger
    Wetland Restoration & Construction Workshop Mormon Lake Ranger Station, 4373 South Lake Mary Road, Flagstaff, AZ. June 11 and 12, 2013 Hosted by: Bat Conservation International, USDA-Forest Service, Arizona Game & Fish Department, and the Center for Wetland and Stream Restoration. Many thanks to our program funders: New-Land Foundation, Brown Family Foundation National Forest Foundation. Workshop details: wetlands provide critical habitat to dozens of wildlife species. Unfortunately, a majority of these ecosystems have been lost to draining and filling throughout North America, affecting recovery efforts for endangered species, reducing water quality, increasing flooding, and reducing ground water supplies. Fortunately, it’s now possible to restore wetlands and to construct wetlands that look and function similar to natural wetlands using techniques developed and tested by the Center for Wetlands and Stream Restoration. This hands-on workshop is designed for individuals interested in learning how to use practical, low cost techniques for building and restoring and creating wetlands. You’ll learn how to select the best locations for building wetlands, test soils, lay out proposed wetlands, choose construction techniques, work with heavy equipment operators, and establish native plants. We will complete a wetland restoration and creation project for bats, northern leopard frogs, and other wildlife on the Mogollon Rim Ranger District and visit multiple wetland sites. Location: The classroom portion of the workshop will be held at the Mormon Lake Ranger Station, 4373 South Lake Mary Road, Flagstaff, Arizona. The wetland restoration and construction project will be at Bill Dick Spring on the Mogollon Ranger District of the Coconino National Forest, approximately 3 miles from Stoneman Lake and 30 miles southwest of Flagstaff.
    [Show full text]
  • NEMO Watershed Based Plan Little Colorado Watershed
    NEMO Watershed Based Plan Little Colorado Watershed Item Type text; Report Authors Parra, Ivan; Reed, Mickey; vanderLeeuw, Elisabeth; Guertin, D. Phillip; Levick, Lainie R.; Uhlman, Kristine Download date 30/09/2021 23:21:56 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/187320 NEMO Watershed Based Plan Little Colorado Watershed Acknowledgements Arizona NEMO acknowledges the University of Arizona Cooperative Extension Service, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) Water Quality Division, the Water Resources Research Center, and the University of Arizona Advanced Resource Technology Lab (ART) for their technical support in producing the Watershed Based Plans. Funding provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Water Act and the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality’s Water Quality Protection Division. Additional financial support is provided by the University of Arizona, Technology and Research Initiative Fund (TRIF), Water Sustainability Program through the Water Resources Research Center. The NEMO website is www.ArizonaNEMO.org. Written and prepared by: Ivan Parra, Mickey Reed, Elisabeth vanderLeeuw, D. Phillip Guertin, Lainie R. Levick and Kristine Uhlman University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona October 2006 Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction Background: Nonpoint Source Pollution and NEMO Watershed Based Plans Purpose and Scope Methods GIS and Hydrologic Modeling Fuzzy Logic Structure of this Plan References Section 2: Physical Features Watershed Size Topography Water Resources Stream Types
    [Show full text]
  • Mormon History and Archaeology in Northern Arizona (19-2)
    ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST CONTINUE ON TO THE NEXT PAGE FOR YOUR magazineFREE PDF (formerly the Center for Desert Archaeology) is a private 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization that explores and protects the places of our past across the American Southwest and Mexican Northwest. We have developed an integrated, conservation- based approach known as Preservation Archaeology. Although Preservation Archaeology begins with the active protection of archaeological sites, it doesn’t end there. We utilize holistic, low-impact investigation methods in order to pursue big-picture questions about what life was like long ago. As a part of our mission to help foster advocacy and appreciation for the special places of our past, we share our discoveries with the public. This free back issue of Archaeology Southwest Magazine is one of many ways we connect people with the Southwest’s rich past. Enjoy! Not yet a member? Join today! Membership to Archaeology Southwest includes: » A Subscription to our esteemed, quarterly Archaeology Southwest Magazine » Updates from This Month at Archaeology Southwest, our monthly e-newsletter » 25% off purchases of in-print, in-stock publications through our bookstore » Discounted registration fees for Hands-On Archaeology classes and workshops » Free pdf downloads of Archaeology Southwest Magazine, including our current and most recent issues » Access to our on-site research library » Invitations to our annual members’ meeting, as well as other special events and lectures Join us at archaeologysouthwest.org/how-to-help In the meantime, stay informed at our regularly updated Facebook page! 300 N Ash Alley, Tucson AZ, 85701 • (520) 882-6946 • [email protected] • www.archaeologysouthwest.org Archaeology Southwest Volume 19, Number 2 Center for Desert Archaeology Spring 2005 Mormon History and Archaeology in Northern Arizona Alan Ferg, Arizona State Museum Richard W.
    [Show full text]