Dear Coconino National Forest Friends, Visitors and Neighbors~

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dear Coconino National Forest Friends, Visitors and Neighbors~ COCONINO 2009 STAKEHOLDERS REPORT Dear Coconino National Forest ecosystems in Arizona. Together with a broad array of stakeholders, including members of local, Friends, Visitors and Neighbors~ county and state governments, environmental groups, and indus- try representatives, the Forests are working to determine how to collec- 2009 was a year that brought with it many challenges and opportuni- tively accelerate landscape-scale restoration of ponderosa pine forests in ties for the Coconino National Forest. We looked beyond our borders northern Arizona which will involve millions of acres. and worked with diverse partners that helped us manage the forest. We We will also be engaging the public in our continuing efforts to revise welcomed millions of campers, visitors, tourists and recreationists who our Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan), and shape the enjoy their National Forest. future of the forest. Although our Forest Plan has been amended many In our Red Rock Ranger District alone, campground visitation was times since its approval in 1987, we need to take a more comprehensive up 30 percent over last year, and their Visitor Office had a whopping approach to revise our Forest Plan to better address the current and 262,448 visitors, up from 79,229 in 2008 and 61,051 in 2007. Volunteers future needs of the forest and surrounding communities. and partners helped us meet these increased demands. Many more collaborative improvement projects will begin this year Our partnerships have allowed us improve the stewardship of the as a result of federal funds that were awarded to Coconino County in forest, and we are grateful for the synergy that is created from these 2009 under the Secure Rural Schools Act. The Act stipulates that a partnerships and volunteers. 15-member committee be created that is made up of diverse stake- The community in northern Arizona is comprised of individuals and holders who represent varying interests and will work closely with organizations that want to be engaged and are passionate about the Coconino forest managers. The Coconino County Resource Advisory land and how it is managed, which helps in this rewarding, yet challeng- Committee will provide advice to the Coconino about forest and wa- ing, work of managing the Coconino. tershed health improvement projects that will simultaneously help to For example, in 2009 we saw the founding of Friends of Northern create jobs in local communities. Arizona Forests, an organization of volunteers who have had previous This year will bring additional challenges as we have already ex- ties to Coconino National Forest and donate their time to help the Peaks perienced a large turnover in personnel as people retire or move on to and Mormon Lake Districts complete projects and field work. other National Forests. We are up to the challenge and will continue to The Four-Forest Restoration Initiative is also a good example of strengthen existing partnerships and build new ones to help us accom- collaborative partnerships. Four National Forests—the Coconino, Kai- plish our mission of caring for bab, Apache-Sitgreaves and Tonto—are ac- the land and serving people. tively engaged in a collaborative, It has been an honor to landscape-scale initiative serve as the Acting Forest Su- designed to restore pervisor, and I thank each and fire-adapted every partner, volunteer, and employee for their dedication and hard work. Joe Stringer Acting Forest Supervisor A Maple tree in the Dane Ridge area Forest Wide Projects Coconino National Forest Holy Fangs! To the Bat Cave! Fire’s Natural & Necessary Role There are 28 species of bats known to occur Fire managers have several ways to embrace fire’s in Arizona, and bat survey efforts are lack- natural and necessary role in the ecosystem. ing in most National Forests. Thinning and prescribed burning help pre- However, our wildlife biologists and vent severe fire behavior, and the response to partners were able to obtain new equip- unplanned fires can range from active manage- ment and conduct bat surveys across ment for resource benefits to full suppression ef- the Coconino this field season. forts. Specialists evaluate each fire’s individual A grant from Arizona conditions such as intensity, location, and po- Game & Fish for $3,800 was tential to determine the appropriate response. used to purchase mist nets This year, conditions allowed crews to and infrared video equip- manage 13 naturally-ignited fires to benefit the ment. In addition, biologists landscape. The Mogollon Rim District alone was also obtained several pairs of able to reduce fuels and enhance forest health on night vision goggles. nearly 17,000 acres by taking advantage of light- Multiple water sources and caves ning-caused fires. For the first time, more acres on across the Coconino National Forest the district were able to be treated with managed fire were mist netted for the safe capture of than prescribed fire. bats. The gender and species of each captured In addition to managing low-intensity fires, fire bat was recorded. managers monitored the unique weather conditions Some of the survey sites were in June to conduct prescribed fires. Burning in selected to gather information for up- June is rare, but its success is a reminder coming projects such as Clint’s Well that prescribed burning is not dependent Forest Restoration Project and Buck- on a season, but rather on conditions. horn Range Grazing Authorization. Interagency cooperation in both sup- pression and prevention efforts is key to 08 09 At known and suspected roost 05 06 07 sites, emergence counts were fire management. A perfect example is 3 04 the Interagency Fuels Crew, composed of 02 0 conducted using infrared binoculars 494 00 01 and videography. personnel from Forest Service and several local fire 99 20 departments, which teamed up on the Eastside 8 With the combined efforts of 9 wildlife crews from the Coconino Na- and Airport projects for a total of nearly 400 97 96 tional Forest, Kaibab National Forest, acres of thinning. This “Mega Fuels Crew” 95 plans to join forces on prescribed fire 490 94 Arizona Game & Fish Department, 93 Bat Conservation International, and A Townsend’s big-eared bat, not- projects to be able to treat more 92 ed for its large ears, smiles for a acres at once, ultimately re- Northern Arizona University, data was 91 photo during the study. ducing the number of days 200 0 collected on 16 species, including 374 9 two Forest Service sensitive species: smoke is in the air. 89 185 Townsend’s big-eared bat and Allen’s lappet-browed bat. 88 182 The findings highlighted important roost sites, identified new 379 136 87 86 roost locations, foraging areas, and important habitat associations 211 170 154 5 that specialists will be able to use in future project planning. 207 8 464 368 156 84 LEFT and TOP PHOTO: Unhappy 293 240 176 83 Allen’s lappet-browed bats show their fangs as they are captured 279 82 for study. This type of bat is 160 81 among the rarest in North America and forms # of Fires 344 271 80 maternity colonies 209 9 in Ponderosa 7 Pine snags. 400 210 78 7 196 7 76 300 75 110 74 200 73 72 2 100 71 1970 Atop the Saddle, below Humphrey’s Peak Forest Wide Projects More Kids In the Woods As part of our effort to get more kids out of • NAU’s Junior Forester Academy: Pro- the house and in the woods, the Coconino Na- vides summer day camps where future forest- tional Forest competed for and received $50,000 ers grow career skills, then apply those skills in funding to be split among seven northern Ari- to community forest health projects. zona programs which partner with the Coconino • North Kaibab Kids Camp: Hosted by and Kaibab National Forests, and Rocky Moun- the North Kaibab Ranger District of the Kaibab tain Research Station-Flagstaff Lab. National Forest, this program offers a cultural The multiple-program proposal was one of and natural science learning camp to students 17 proposals selected nationwide for funding. from Fredonia and the Kaibab Piute Tribe. The Forest Service received 197 proposals • Wildlife in Native Schools: Managed by overall and awarded a total of $500,000. the Forest Service’s Rocky Mountain Research The More Kids in the Northern Arizona Station-Flagstaff Lab, the program includes Woods partners and projects include: field trips to the historic Fort Valley Experimen- • Elden Pueblo: Arizona Natural History tal Forest Station, in partnership with Northern Association’s Public Archaeology Project offers Mogollon Rim for urban youth and their families. Arizona University’s Institute for Tribal Envi- youth hands-on field experience learning about • Museum of Northern Arizona’s Discov- ronmental Professionals Environmental people of prehistoric cultures and their relation- ery Program: Offers summer sessions for kids to Education Outreach Program. # of Fires ship with the land. learn about the region’s fine arts, natural sciences, • Camp Colton: Flagstaff Unified School native cultures and ecology. District provides 6th-grade students week-long 460 400 410 camps using the national forest as their out- door classroom to learn about their environ- ment and themselves. 448 317 300 280 • Camp Colley: Supported by the Camp 443 299 Colley Foundation with the City of Phoe- nix Parks and Recreation Depart- 271 200 198 ment, this program offers 225 159 158 outdoor experiences 224 121 157 306 128 near the 176 100 283 225 89 183 98 392 105 184 137 128 95 82 319 244 214 133 9 242 08 0 06 07 328 147 4 05 2 03 0 283 203 153 01 0 180 000 2 131 99 293 220 98 39-Year Fire 97 229 151 96 200 95 267 245 94 Summary Timeline 93 170 92 191 91 Lightning-caused fires 0 9 Human-caused fires 145 89 88 7 8 86 85 84 3 8 82 1 8 80 9 7 78 7 7 76 75 74 3 7 72 3 71 Birdie Fire Taylor Fire Slurry Drop Mormon Lake Fuels Crew 1970 Peaks & Mormon Lake It’s been a very busy Hoxworth Springs Channel Restoration and productive year on the Peaks and Mormon Restoring degraded stream channels is a vital Lake Ranger District.
Recommended publications
  • Arizona Fishing Regulations 3 Fishing License Fees Getting Started
    2019 & 2020 Fishing Regulations for your boat for your boat See how much you could savegeico.com on boat | 1-800-865-4846insurance. | Local Offi ce geico.com | 1-800-865-4846 | Local Offi ce See how much you could save on boat insurance. Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states or all GEICO companies. Boat and PWC coverages are underwritten by GEICO Marine Insurance Company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, D.C. 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. TowBoatU.S. is the preferred towing service provider for GEICO Marine Insurance. The GEICO Gecko Image © 1999-2017. © 2017 GEICO AdPages2019.indd 2 12/4/2018 1:14:48 PM AdPages2019.indd 3 12/4/2018 1:17:19 PM Table of Contents Getting Started License Information and Fees ..........................................3 Douglas A. Ducey Governor Regulation Changes ...........................................................4 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH COMMISSION How to Use This Booklet ...................................................5 JAMES S. ZIELER, CHAIR — St. Johns ERIC S. SPARKS — Tucson General Statewide Fishing Regulations KURT R. DAVIS — Phoenix LELAND S. “BILL” BRAKE — Elgin Bag and Possession Limits ................................................6 JAMES R. AMMONS — Yuma Statewide Fishing Regulations ..........................................7 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT Common Violations ...........................................................8 5000 W. Carefree Highway Live Baitfish
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior U.S
    United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 FAX: (602) 242-2513 In Reply Refer To: AESO/SE 22410-2003-F-0430 April 1, 2008 To: Regional Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico (Attn: L. Roberts) From: Field Supervisor Subject: Intra-Service Biological and Conference Opinion - Issuance of a Section 10(a)(1)(B) Permit to Salt River Project for Incidental Take of Threatened and Endangered Species Associated With Operation of Horseshoe and Bartlett Reservoirs This biological and conference opinion responds to the request for consultation with the Arizona Ecological Services Office pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544), as amended (Act). At issue are impacts that may result from issuance of a permit in accordance with section 10(a)(1)(B) (permit) of the Act for incidental take of threatened and endangered species associated with operation of Horseshoe and Bartlett dams and reservoirs by Salt River Project (SRP) in Maricopa and Yavapai counties, Arizona. Issuance of the permit may affect the endangered southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) (flycatcher) and its critical habitat, the threatened bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), the threatened spikedace (Meda fulgida), the threatened loach minnow (Tiaroga cobitis), the endangered razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) and its critical habitat, the endangered Gila topminnow (Poeciliopsis occidentalis),
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona, Pre 1930, White Border Post Card Collection Section 3
    Arizona, Pre 1930, White Border Post Card Collection Section 3 — D to F By Al Ring Early and Pre 1930, White Border: (Around 1898 to 1930) Pioneer Era (Pre 1898) — Most pre-1898 postcards share a few common traits: The postcard of this era is characterized by an undivided back (no line going down the center of the back of the postcard), and many con- tain printed lines on the back for the name of the addressee and his address only. Private Mailing Card Era (1898 to December 24, 1901) — On May 19, 1898, by an act of Congress, private printers were granted permission to print and sell cards that bore the inscription “Private Mailing card.” Cost of postage reduced from 2 cents to 1 cent. Undivided Back “Postcard” Era (December 24, 1901 to March 1, 1907) — The use of the word “POST CARD/POSTCARD” (as one or two words) was granted by the government to private printers. Writing was still not permitted on the address side. Divided Back Era (March 1, 1907 to 1915) (Golden Age) —Postcards with a divided back were finally permit- ted on March 1, 1907. The address had to be written on the right side of the back of the postcard while the left side was reserved for writing messages. White Border Era (1915-1930) —After WWI printers of view postcards, to save ink, a white border was left around the view, thus we call them “White Border” postcards. The higher cost of post-war publishing com- bined with inexperienced labor caused the production of poorer quality cards.
    [Show full text]
  • Free PDF Download
    ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST CONTINUE ON TO THE NEXT PAGE FOR YOUR magazineFREE PDF (formerly the Center for Desert Archaeology) is a private 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization that explores and protects the places of our past across the American Southwest and Mexican Northwest. We have developed an integrated, conservation- based approach known as Preservation Archaeology. Although Preservation Archaeology begins with the active protection of archaeological sites, it doesn’t end there. We utilize holistic, low-impact investigation methods in order to pursue big-picture questions about what life was like long ago. As a part of our mission to help foster advocacy and appreciation for the special places of our past, we share our discoveries with the public. This free back issue of Archaeology Southwest Magazine is one of many ways we connect people with the Southwest’s rich past. Enjoy! Not yet a member? Join today! Membership to Archaeology Southwest includes: » A Subscription to our esteemed, quarterly Archaeology Southwest Magazine » Updates from This Month at Archaeology Southwest, our monthly e-newsletter » 25% off purchases of in-print, in-stock publications through our bookstore » Discounted registration fees for Hands-On Archaeology classes and workshops » Free pdf downloads of Archaeology Southwest Magazine, including our current and most recent issues » Access to our on-site research library » Invitations to our annual members’ meeting, as well as other special events and lectures Join us at archaeologysouthwest.org/how-to-help In the meantime, stay informed at our regularly updated Facebook page! 300 N Ash Alley, Tucson AZ, 85701 • (520) 882-6946 • [email protected] • www.archaeologysouthwest.org ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST SPRING 2014 A QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF ARCHAEOLOGYmagazine SOUTHWEST VOLUME 28 | NUMBER 2 A Good Place to Live for more than 12,000 Years Archaeology in Arizona's Verde Valley 3 A Good Place to Live for More Than 12,000 Years: Archaeology ISSUE EDITOR: in Arizona’s Verde Valley, Todd W.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Game and Fish Commission Rules
    NATURAL RESOURCES 54 Arizona Game and Fish Commission Rules The rules contained in this publication are printed as supplied to LexisNexis by the Arizona Office of Secretary of State. TITLE 12 Section R12-4-210. Repealed NATURAL RESOURCES R12-4-211. Repealed R12-4-212. Repealed R12-4-213. Repealed CHAPTER 4 R12-4-214. Repealed R12-4-215. Tournament Fishing Permit Regulations GAME AND FISH COMMISSION R12-4-216. Crossbow Permit (Authority: A.R.S. § 17-201 et seq.) R12-4-217. Challenged Hunters Access/Mobility Permit R12-4-218. Repealed ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL R12-4-219. Renumbered PROVISIONS R12-4-220. Repealed Section ARTICLE 3. TAKING AND HANDLING OF R12-4-101. Definitions WILDLIFE R12-4-102. Fees for Licenses, Tags, Stamps, and Permits R12-4-103. Duplicate Tags and Licenses R12-4-301. Restrictions for Taking Wildlife in Maricopa R12-4-104. Application Procedures for Issuance of Hunt Per- County Parks mit-tags by Drawing R12-4-302. Use of Tags R12-4-105. License Dealer’s License R12-4-303. Unlawful Devices and Ammunition R12-4-106. Licensing Time-frames R12-4-304. Lawful Methods for Taking Wild Mammals, Birds, R12-4-107. Bonus Point System and Reptiles R12-4-108. Management Unit Boundaries R12-4-305. Possessing, Transporting, Importing, Exporting, R12-4-109. Repealed and Selling Carcasses or Parts of Wildlife R12-4-110. Posting and access to state land R12-4-306. Buffalo Hunt Requirements R12-4-111. Identification Number R12-4-307. Trapping Regulations: Licensing; Methods; Tag- R12-4-112. Diseased or injured wildlife ging of Bobcat Pelts R12-4-113.
    [Show full text]
  • Elden Pueblo
    Prehistoric Sites -- Elden Pueblo CONTRIBUTOR: Walter Gosart - AAS Northern Arizona Chapter LOCATION: Just minutes from downtown Flagstaff, you will find Elden Pueblo on the west side of Hwy 89. It is tucked away behind the Ponderosa pine trees. The parking lot is located just south of the traffic light at the Camp Townsend-Winona Road. PUBLIC VISITATION: Located on National Forest land and is open year round. Self guided tour. SITE DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND: Elden pueblo is a large site in the Flagstaff area. At 50-60 rooms, it rivals it's more well-known contemporaries such as Wupatki and Walnut Canyon and was quite likely one of the main villages of the A.D.1150-1275 Sinagua (See-nah-wa) culture. It is situated atop an earlier pithouse village, one of hundreds that dot the Northern Arizona landscape. Elden pueblo is a large site in the Flagstaff area. At 50-60 rooms, it rivals it's more well-known contemporaries such as Wupatki and Walnut Canyon and was quite likely one of the main villages of the A.D.1150-1275 Sinagua (See- nah-wa) culture. It is situated atop an earlier pithouse village, one of hundreds that dot the Northern Arizona landscape. In 1926 Dr., Jesse Walter Fewkes, a famous archaeologist with the Smithsonian Institution in Washington DC, excavated and stabilized portions of Elden Pueblo. He hoped to turn the site into a national monument when work was completed. Plans for the monument fell through, but that did not stop people from visiting the site and sharing in its excitement.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrate Archaeology Month!
    Celebrate Archaeology Month! Remember, when visiting archaeological site, take only pictures and leave only footprints. These special places are fragile traces of the past. Native Americans who live in the area have ancestral connections to these areas. Scientists and Native Americans alike can learn much about an untold history of the area based on the locations of structures and artifacts. Removing artifacts and damaging cultural sites is against the law and ruins the experience for future generations to enjoy. Walnut Canyon National Monument: Activity: Visit Walnut Canyon. Make a sketch of a cliff dwelling. How many people do you think might have lived in the room? How long ago did people live at Walnut Canyon? Learn more and take tours at https://www.nps.gov/waca/index.htm Google Map: https://goo.gl/maps/6BouhEMKgfLFw3Yz5 Picture Canyon Natural and Cultural Preserve: Take a picture or make a sketch of your favorite petroglyph in Picture Canyon. What story do you think the petroglyph is trying to tell? Learn more at https://www.flagstaff.az.gov/2881/Picture-Canyon-Natural-Cultural-Preserve Google Map: https://goo.gl/maps/Qs3higueFgiG5bmn6 (trailhead for 3 mile loop.) Elden Pueblo, Coconino National Forest: Activity: Walk around the short trail at Elden Pueblo. How many rooms can you count? How many people do you think lived there? Learn more and download activity books at https://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/coconino/learning/history-culture/?cid=stelprdb5350363 Google Map: https://goo.gl/maps/zeNzZhuYctLqnCDg8 Keyhole Sink Petroglyphs, Kaibab National Forest: Take a short hike to Keyhole Sink. Make a sketch or take a picture of your favorite petroglyph.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Department of Health Services Division of Public Health Services Bureau of Health Systems Development
    Arizona Department of Health Services Division of Public Health Services Bureau of Health Systems Development Designation of Arizona Medically Underserved Areas October 2016 Douglas A. Ducey, Governor Cara M. Christ, Director http://www.azdhs.gov/prevention/health-systems-development/data-reports-maps/index.php#reports BUREAU OF HEALTH SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT, Arizona Department of Health Services October 2016 Page 1 of 25 INTRODUCTION The Arizona Medically Underserved Area (AzMUA) report is prepared by the Arizona Department of Health Services, as mandated by A.R.S. § 36-2352. Within the Arizona Department of Health Services, Division of Public Health, the Bureau of Health Systems Development (HSD) is responsible for activities associated with the implementation of A.R.S. § 36-2352. HSD is responsible for assisting communities in obtaining both state and federal shortage designations. Additionally, HSD manages the Arizona Loan Repayment Programs established by A.R.S. § 36-2172 and A.R.S. § 36-2174. The Arizona Loan Repayment Programs provide incentives in the form of loan repayment for primary health care providers to work in medically underserved areas. The Arizona Rural Private Practice Loan Repayment Program utilizes AzMUA designation as a criteria. Non-Department programs that require AzMUA designation include: the Arizona Medical Student Loan Program under A.R.S. Title 15, Chapter 13, Article 7, and priority consideration by the University of Arizona School of Medicine under A.R.S. § 15-1751 for applicants who demonstrate a willingness to practice in the state's underserved areas and the establishment of health service districts pursuant to A.R.S. Title 48, Chapter 16, Article 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Flagstaff Visitor Study 2017-2018
    Acknowledgements The authors would like to recognize all the people who helped to make this study possible. First, thanks go to the Flagstaff Convention & Visitors Bureau, which has been an advocate of tourism research to inform its marketing and promotion efforts. In particular, we want to thank Trace Ward, Flagstaff CVB Director, and Lori Pappas, Marketing and Public Relations Manager, for their support and participation in the project. Without the support of everyone at the CVB, this critical market research project would not have been possible. Thanks also go to Kari Roberg, Research Manager and Colleen Floyd, Director of Research at the Arizona Office of Tourism without whose help this project would also not have been possible. We want to acknowledge the help of many individuals in the Flagstaff tourism community who were key to the success of this project, including: • Little America Hotel – Susan Jennings • Flagstaff Visitor Center – Anna Good • Museum of Northern Arizona – Suzanne Shenton • Flagstaff Extreme – Rachel Buzzard • Lowell Observatory – Molly Baker • Best Western Pony Soldier Inn & Suites – Scott Grams and Mark Ross • Residence Inn by Marriott Downtown – Misty Medina • DoubleTree by Hilton Flagstaff – Belen Mendez • GreenTree Inn – Frank Benitez • The Weatherford – Klaudia Ness The dedicated staff at these locations contacted visitors, asked them to complete the survey, and collected responses. It was through their efforts that this project achieved the sample sizes needed. Finally, we extend a special thank you to all those who visited Flagstaff and agreed to share information about their experiences. Without their willingness to participate in the survey process, this report simply would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Western Apache Homeland and Archaeology of the Mogollon Rim
    Shí Kéyaa: The Western Apache Homeland and Archaeology of the Mogollon Rim Angie Krall Vincent E. Randall Technical Report No. 2007-03 Desert Archaeology, Inc. Shí Kéyaa: The Western Apache Homeland and Archaeology of the Mogollon Rim Angie Krall Vincent E. Randall Technical Report No. 2007-03 Desert Archaeology, Inc. 3975 N. Tucson Boulevard, Tucson, Arizona 85716 • July 2009 PREFACE The realignment of State Route 260 (SR 260) be- Cores and frontiers depend on vantage point, tween Payson and Heber follows a long tradition however. In this report, KenCairn and Randall ad- of trail blazing through the lands below the Mogol- dress the presumption of the interpretation that lon Rim region. For over 3,000 years, people have described the region as frontier. They examine the passed through the region, perhaps following the region as a homeland and an essential and central route of the modern highway through spring-fed part of the history and identity of Apache, even as meadows and perennial streams. For at least 350 private and public entities have claimed the lands years, the stewards of this land have often been of the Mogollon Rim and native peoples have been Apache and Yavapai. moved to reservations. For modern Apache, the area is a “bridge” be- An extensive view of the Apache use of the tween the modern Yavapai-Apache Nation, Tonto, sub-Mogollon Rim was drawn from published and White Mountain, and San Carlos Reservations. unpublished ethnographic work on Apache places, Tribal members recall trails traveled by foot, don- cultural resource management reports, and the key, horse, or car, as well as camps made under the records of the public agencies who protect and trees, ramadas, or wickiups.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3. Management Areas
    Chapter 3. Management Areas Introduction to Management Areas Management areas are areas that have similar management intent and a common management strategy that are more specific than forestwide guidance provided in Chapter 2. This direction does not substitute for or repeat forestwide direction, but rather provides additional direction for the applicable area. In the event that a plan decision in this section and the forestwide component in another section conflict, the more restrictive plan decision generally prevails. A project or activity-level evaluation, however, may be required to resolve the conflict; generally, however, the more restrictive plan decision prevails. Some management areas are special areas that have been designated by Congress or an office of the Executive Branch. They are managed to protect the special features or character for which they were designated and must be managed in accordance with relevant law, regulation, and policy and any area- specific management plan, such as the Verde River Comprehensive River Management Plan. Because of the complication of carrying forward direction from the previous forest plan there are two management areas that overlay the Sedona-Oak Creek Management Area (MA). The Oak Creek Canyon and House Mountain-Lowlands MAs are both subject to direction for the Sedona-Oak Creek MA and have unique direction that applies only to these overlay areas. In addition, there are several guidelines in the Sedona-Oak Creek MA to which the House Mountain-Lowlands MA is an exception. Scenery desired conditions (desired landscape character) for wilderness and wild and scenic rivers is described in the MA direction. For other management areas, see the Landscape Character Zones for this direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Skeletons of War – Migration and Violence in the Northern Southwest
    Bulletin of Old Pueblo Archaeology Center Tucson, Arizona March 2011 Number 65 Number **** Skeletons of War: Migration and Violence in the Northern Southwest in Late Prehistory Lewis Borck University of Arizona A jigsaw puzzle should never be left unfinished. How else will you know that it is Elvis shooting pool with James Dean if all you have are the outlines of the puzzle and a pile of The Gallina highlands mixed up pieces in the center of the table? Archaeological interpretations can resemble un- finished puzzles; bare outlines–sometimes with the wrong pieces jammed into place. From these puzzles, we try to reconstruct past cultures and understand complex historical processes. In order for this to happen, though, it is important to consider all the pieces, not just the ones that fit together easily. It is also important to be persistent and keep coming back to the pieces that don’t seem to fit, because often they are the ones that that hold the key to solving the puzzle. Since the 1930s, researchers have characterized the prehistoric residents of the rugged Gallina high- lands of northwestern New Mexico as culturally isolated and backwards. Not only did cultural develop- ments lag behind those in neighboring areas — most of the population was still living in pithouses when Great Houses were being built in Chaco Canyon and cliff dwellings were the norm at Mesa Verde — but the Gallina people also seemed prone to violence. A sharp contrast was often drawn between the violent and bar- baric behavior of these “isolated hill folk” and the rela- tively peaceful and civilized behavior of other Ances- tral Pueblo groups.
    [Show full text]