DOCSLIB.ORG

Statewide Recreational Fishing Survey 2013–14

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Statewide Recreational Fishing Survey 2013–14 Statewide Recreational Fishing Survey 2013–14 CS4725 10/15 This publication has been written by James Webley, Kirrily McInnes, Daniella Teixeira, Ashley Lawson and Ross Quinn from the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries. © State of Queensland, 2015 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Contents List of figures ......................................................................................................................................... v List of tables ........................................................................................................................................... x Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. xii Glossary ............................................................................................................................................... xiii Summary ............................................................................................................................................... xv Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Benefits and impacts of recreational fishing .......................................................................................... 2 Need for recreational fishing information ............................................................................................... 2 Aims and objectives ............................................................................................................................... 3 Comparison with previous surveys ........................................................................................................ 3 Relevance to fisheries assessments and sustainability ......................................................................... 4 Relevance to management and industry development .......................................................................... 4 Report structure ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Methods .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Survey overview ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Survey stages ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Screening survey ................................................................................................................................. 6 Diary survey ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Non-intending fisher households follow-up survey .............................................................................. 7 Attitudinal/wash-up survey ................................................................................................................... 8 Survey scope ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Geographical scope ............................................................................................................................... 8 Catch, effort and reasons for release................................................................................................... 11 Reporting the catch .............................................................................................................................. 12 Converting the recreational catch from numbers to weight ................................................................. 12 Survey estimates and the standard error ............................................................................................. 13 Comparison with previous surveys ...................................................................................................... 13 Testing representativeness of the survey ............................................................................................ 14 Results .................................................................................................................................................. 15 Sample and response profiles ............................................................................................................. 15 Screening survey ............................................................................................................................... 15 Diary survey ....................................................................................................................................... 16 Wash-up survey and non-intending fisher follow up survey .............................................................. 17 Demographics, participation, club membership and boat ownership .................................................. 17 Number of fisher households ............................................................................................................. 17 i Number of fishers ............................................................................................................................... 17 Number of fishers by residential region ............................................................................................. 17 Number of fishers by gender and age ............................................................................................... 18 Fishing and diving club membership ................................................................................................. 19 Household boat ownership ................................................................................................................ 20 Inter-annual fishing frequency .............................................................................................................. 26 Recreational fishing effort .................................................................................................................... 28 Total effort .......................................................................................................................................... 28 Effort by residential region ................................................................................................................. 28 Effort by fishing region ....................................................................................................................... 29 Effort by residential region and fishing region .................................................................................... 30 Effort by water body ........................................................................................................................... 33 Effort by fishing method ..................................................................................................................... 33 Effort by fishing platform .................................................................................................................... 34 Effort by season ................................................................................................................................. 35 Effort by fishing depth ........................................................................................................................ 35 Recreational catch ............................................................................................................................... 37 Total catch summary .......................................................................................................................... 37 Catch, release and harvest of all species .......................................................................................... 37 Reasons for release ........................................................................................................................... 39 Targeted catch vs actual catch .......................................................................................................... 41 Harvest weights and comparison with commercial catch .................................................................. 41 Catch by water body .........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Influence of Zoning on Midshelf Shoals of the Southern Great Barrier Reef
    Influence of zoning on midshelf shoals of the southern Great Barrier Reef Marcus Stowar1, Glenn De’ath1, Peter Doherty1, Charlotte Johansson1, Peter Speare1, and Bill Venables2 1Australian Institute of Marine Science 2CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences Supported by the Australian Government’s Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility Project 4.8.2 Influence of the Great Barrier Reef Zoning Plan on inshore habitats and biodiversity, of which fish and corals are indicators: Reefs and shoals © Australian Institute of Marine Science This report should be cited as: Stowar, M., De’ath, G., Doherty, P., Johansson, C., Speare, P. and Venables, B. (2008) Influence of zoning on midshelf shoals of the southern Great Barrier Reef. Report to the Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility. Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns (106pp.). Published online by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre on behalf of the Australian Government’s Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility. The Australian Government’s Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility (MTSRF) supports world-class, public good research. The MTSRF is a major initiative of the Australian Government, designed to ensure that Australia’s environmental challenges are addressed in an innovative, collaborative and sustainable way. The MTSRF investment is managed by the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (DEWHA), and is supplemented by substantial cash and in-kind investments from research providers and interested third parties. The Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited (RRRC) is contracted by DEWHA to provide program management and communications services for the MTSRF. This publication is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Assessment of the Queensland Coral Reef Fin Fish Fishery
    Smart State smart fishing Ecological assessment of the Queensland coral reef fin fish fishery A report to the Australian Government Department of Environment and Heritage on the ecologically sustainable management of a multi-species line fishery in a coral reef environment Claire Andersen, Kadesh Clarke, Jim Higgs and Shannon Ryan With contributions from: Danny Brooks, Mark Elmer, Malcolm Dunning, Brad Zeller, Jeff Bibby, Lew Williams, Clare Bullock, Stephanie Slade and Warwick Lee (DPI&F Fisheries) Ian Brown and Wayne Sumpton (DPI&F Animal Sciences) Gavin Begg and Ashley Williams (CRC Reef) Bob Grimley (DPI&F Queensland Boating and Fisheries Patrol) TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 6 FISHERY DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................... 9 DISTRIBUTION............................................................................................................................................ 9 BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY ............................................................................................................................. 9 FISHERY AREA AND ENDORSEMENTS .........................................................................................................15 THE COMMERCIAL SECTOR .......................................................................................................................17 THE RECREATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Management
    FISHERIES MANAGEMENT AN INTRODUCTION FOR COMMUNITY AND VILLAGE USE Student resource manual 1 CFMDP community-based management training programme © 2007 Coastal Fisheries Management and Development Project and the PNG National Fisheries Authority All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher and individual authors. National Library Service Cataloguing-in-Publication: National Fisheries Authority (Papua New Guinea). Fisheries management: an introduction for community and village use / National Fisheries Authority and the Coastal Fisheries Management and Development Project. -- [Kavieng] : National Fisheries Authority and Coastal Fisheries Management and Development Project, 2006. 71 p. ; cm. ISBN 9980-86-085-5 1. Fishery management. 2. Fishes. 3. Fishes – Ecology. 4. Marine ecology. I. Title. II. Coastal Fisheries Management and Development Project (Papua New Guinea). 639.3 -- dc22 This manual has been prepared for the Coastal Fisheries Management and Development Project (CFMDP) by the project's Community Fisheries Management Adviser, Lyn Lambeth. The contents have been drawn from a variety of sources, both published and unpublished, including work of the Community Fisheries Section of the Secretariat of the Pacific Community, the University of the South Pacific's Marine Studies Programme, The Pacific Regional Environment Programme, and the Samoa Fisheries Division. Written sources are listed in the bibliography at the end of the manual. The manual was prepared as a learning resource for CFMDP training courses in fisheries management, hosted at the National Fisheries College, Kavieng, New Ireland in October 2004 and September 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Proteome-Scale Analysis of Vertebrate Protein Thermoadaptation Modulated by Dynamic Allostery and Protein Solvation
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.10.244558; this version posted August 11, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Proteome-scale Analysis of Vertebrate Protein Thermoadaptation Modulated by Dynamic Allostery and Protein Solvation Zhen-lu Li 1* and Matthias Buck 1,2* 1Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, U. S. A. 2Department of Pharmacology; Department of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, U. S. A. E-mail corresponding authors: [email protected], [email protected] Subtitle: Trends in the selection of amino acids in the temperature adaptation of vertebrate organisms Abstract Despite large differences in behaviors and living conditions, vertebrate organisms share the great majority of proteins often with subtle differences in amino acid sequence. By comparing a set of substantially homologous proteins between model vertebrate organisms at a sub-proteome level, we discover a pattern of amino acid conservation and a shift in amino acid use, noticeably with an apparent distinction between homeotherms (warm-blooded species) and poikilotherms (cold-blooded species). Importantly, we establish a connection between the thermoadaptation of protein sequences manifest in the evolved proteins and two of their physical features: a change in their proteins dynamics and in their solvation. For poikilotherms such as frog and fish, the lower body temperature is expected to increase the association of proteins due to a decrease in protein dynamics and correspondingly lower entropy penalty on binding.
    [Show full text]
  • Linking the Science and Practice of Environmental Health
    Environmental Health The Journal of the Australian Institute of Environmental Health ...linking...linking thethe sciencescience andand practicepractice ofof EnvironmentalEnvironmental HealthHealth Environmental Health The Journal of the Australian Institute of Environmental Health ABN 58 000 031 998 Advisory Board Ms Jan Bowman, Department of Human Services, Victoria Professor Valerie A. Brown AO, University of Western Sydney and School of Resources, Environment and Society, Australian National University Dr Nancy Cromar, Flinders University Associate Professor Heather Gardner Mr Waikay Lau, Chief Executive Officer, Australian Institute of Environmental Health Mr John Murrihy, Kingston City Council, Victoria and Director, Australian Institute of Environmental Health Dr Ron Pickett, Curtin University Dr Eve Richards, TAFE Tasmania Dr Thomas Tenkate, Queensland Health Editor Associate Professor Heather Gardner Editorial Committee Dr Ross Bailie, Menzies School of Health Research Dr Dean Bertolatti, Curtin University of Technology Mr Hudson H. Birden, Northern Rivers University Department of Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney Dr Helen A. Cameron, Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra Mr Peter Davey, Griffith University Dr Chris Derry, University of Western Sydney Ms Louise Dunn, Swinburne University of Technology Professor Christine Ewan, University of Wollongong Associate Professor Howard Fallowfield, Flinders University Ms Jane Heyworth, University of Western Australia Mr Stuart Heggie, Tropical Public Health Unit, Cairns Dr Deborah Hennessy, Developing Health Care, Kent, UK Professor Steve Hrudey, University of Alberta, Canada Professor Michael Jackson, University of Strathclyde, Scotland Mr Ross Jackson, Maddocks, Melbourne Mr Steve Jeffes, TAFE Tasmania Mr George Kupfer, Underwriters Laboratories Inc, Illinois, USA Professor Vivian Lin, La Trobe University Mr Ian MacArthur, The Chartered Institute of Environmental Health, London Dr Bruce Macler, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Sampling Techniques for Crayfish Eric R
    CHAPTER 8 Field Sampling Techniques for Crayfish Eric R. Larson1,* and Julian D. Olden2 Introduction Why do we study crayfi sh? Answers may range from their cultural or economic value (Jones et al. 2006) to ecological importance (Usio and Townsend 2004) to the high conservation need of many species (Taylor et al. 2007). Alternatively, one justifi cation for the emergence of crayfi sh as model organisms (e.g., Crandall 2000) has been their ubiquity and ease of collection relative to a rewarding range of biological insights. For example, Thomas Henry Huxley (1884) in his introduction to the study of zoology framed his book around crayfi sh in part because the “[the crayfi sh] is readily obtained.” Yet those of us who need to quantitatively sample crayfi sh recognize that “readily obtained” does not necessarily translate into representative of broader populations or communities. Huxley (1884) might be countered by observations like those of Rabeni et al. (1997), who note that no crayfi sh sampling method is without biases that may misrepresent attributes ranging from relative abundance to size and age structure of populations. Ultimately, quantitative sampling for crayfi sh presents a number of challenges to confound even the most experienced of fi eld biologists. Writing a comprehensive review of fi eld sampling methods for crayfi sh must accommodate both the diversity of crayfi sh themselves and the diversity of researchers interested in them. Crayfi sh occur in habitats ranging from large lakes to wadeable streams, to diffi cult to sample environments like caves and terrestrial burrows. These diff erent habitats demand diff erent sampling tools and approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Expression of Pancreatic Enzyme Genes During the Early Larval Stage of Japanese Eel Anguilla Japonica
    FISHERIES SCIENCE 2002; 68: 736–744 Expression of pancreatic enzyme genes during the early larval stage of Japanese eel Anguilla japonica Tadahide KUROKAWA,* Tohru SUZUKI, Hiromi OHTA, Hirohiko KAGAWA, Hideki TANAKA AND Tatsuya UNUMA National Research Institute of Aquaculture, Fisheries Research Agency, Nansei, Mie 516-0193, Japan ABSTRACT: To reveal the ontogeny of pancreatic exocrine function in the early larval stage of eel, cDNAs encoding major pancreatic enzymes, trypsinogen, amylase and lipase were identified from the Japanese eel Anguilla japonica and their expression pattern in larvae was analyzed. The cloned eel trypsinogen precursor consisted of 224 amino acids and showed 82.2% identity to trypsinogen- 2 of winter flounder Pleuronectes americanus. The eel amylase precursor consisted of 512 amino acids and showed 77% identity to winter flounder amylase. Eel pancreatic lipase was composed of 470 amino acids and had 58.3% of identity to human pancreatic lipase. In the eel larvae, mRNA expression of trypsinogen and amylase was first detected at 6 days post-hatching (d.p.h.), and the expression level increased between 7 and 8 d.p.h. In contrast, mRNA expression of lipase was first detected at 8 d.p.h. Eel larvae start to feed actively at 8 d.p.h. Thus, it was indicated that eel pan- creas starts to synthesize digestive enzymes at 6 d.p.h. and acquires full function by the onset of exogenous feeding at 8 d.p.h. KEY WORDS: amylase, cDNA, eel, larvae, lipase, mRNA expression, pancreatic enzymes, trypsinogen. INTRODUCTION digestive tract of wild Anguilliformes leptocephali feces of zooplankton and larvacean house were Anguilliformes, including eel, have a unique larval found.8 However, the natural food of eel prelepto- stage called leptocephalus.1 Tsukamoto2 estimated cephali is still unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • (2009) Comparative Biology of Key Inter-Reefal Serranid Species on the Great Barrier Reef
    Comparative biology of key inter-reefal serranid species on the Great Barrier Reef Project Milestone Report Amos Mapleston1, Leanne M. Currey1, Ashley J. Williams1, Rachel Pears2, Colin A. Simpfendorfer1, Ann L. Penny1, Andrew Tobin1 and David Welch3 1 Fishing and Fisheries Research Centre, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University 2 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 3 Queensland Primary Industries and Fisheries Supported by the Australian Government’s Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility Project 4.8.3 Evaluation of the resiliency of key inter-reefal fish species © James Cook University This report should be cited as: Mapleston, A., Currey, L.M., Williams, A.J., Pears, R., Simpfendorfer, C.A., Penny, A.L., Tobin, A. and Welch, D. (2009) Comparative biology of key inter-reefal serranid species on the Great Barrier Reef. Project Milestone Report to the Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility. Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns (55pp.). This report is made available online by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre on behalf of the Australian Government’s Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility. The Australian Government’s Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility (MTSRF) supports world-class, public good research. The MTSRF is a major initiative of the Australian Government, designed to ensure that Australia’s environmental challenges are addressed in an innovative, collaborative and sustainable way. The MTSRF investment is managed by the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (DEWHA), and is supplemented by substantial cash and in-kind investments from research providers and interested third parties. The Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited (RRRC) is contracted by DEWHA to provide program management and communications services for the MTSRF.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F. AIMS Regional Shoals and Shelf Assessment (Heyward Et
    Appendix F. AIMS Regional Shoals and Shelf Assessment (Heyward et al. 2017) Includes Addendum: Regional Biodiversity Patterns and Connectivity Amongst the Submerged Shoals and Banks in Relation to the Area of Influence from a Hypothetical Uncontrolled Release BAROSSA ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE STUDY 2015 AIMS FINAL REPORT SERINGAPATAM REEF BASELINE SURVEYS 2012-2013 Regional Shoals & Shelf Assessment 2015 Authors: Andrew Heyward, Ben Radford, Mike Cappo, Mary Wakeford, Rebecca Fisher, Jamie Colquhoun, Mark Case, Marcus Stowar, Karen Miller PRODUCED FOR ConocoPhillips Australia Pty Ltd Contract No. 251834.0-MSA-COMP-2.0 PERTH April 2017 Rev 1 BAROSSA ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE STUDY 2015 AIMS FINAL REPORT SERINGAPATAM REEF BASELINE SURVEYS 2012-2013 Final: 30 March 2009 Australian Institute of Marine Science PMB No 3 Townsville MC Qld 4810 University of Western Australia Oceans Institute (M096) 35 Stirling Hwy Crawley WA 6009 PO Box 41775 Casuarina NT 0811 This report should be cited as: A Heyward et al. 2017; Barossa Environmental Baseline Study, Regional Shoals and Shelf Assessment 2015 Final Report. A report for ConocoPhillips Australia Exploration Pty Ltd by the Australian Institute of Marine Science, Perth 2017. 143pp Corresponding Author: Dr Andrew Heyward [email protected] © Copyright Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) and ConocoPhillips Australia Pty Ltd. 2017 All rights are reserved and no part of this document may be reproduced, stored or copied in any form or by any means whatsoever except with the prior written permission of AIMS and COPA. Revision History Issue Rev 1 Apr 2017 Issue Rev 0 Oct 2016 Draft Rev B Sept 2016 Draft Rev A June 2016 Acknowledgments: This survey relied on the professionalism and support of RV Solander’s Master & crew.
    [Show full text]
  • Examination of Mycotoxins in Pet Foods Using Enzyme-Linked
    Labeling compliance and species authentication of fish fillets sold at grocery stores in Southern California A Thesis by Priscila Liou Chapman University Orange, California Schmid College of Science and Technology Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Food Science May 2019 Committee in charge: Rosalee Hellberg, Ph.D., Thesis Advisor Fredric Caporaso, Ph.D. Lilian Were, Ph.D. Digitally signed by Lilian Were DN: cn=Lilian Were, Lilian o=Chapman university, ou, [email protected], c=US Were Date: 2019.05.22 14:17:09 -07'00' Labeling compliance and species authentication of fish fillets sold at grocery stores in Southern California Copyright © 2019 by Priscila Liou iii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my family and friends who have been a part of this journey with me. To my brother, who is my favorite and only sibling. I continue to be amazed by your compassion and kindness, your commitment to excellence, and your ability to see the bigger picture during challenging times. To my dad, my grandma, and my aunt for their never ceasing love from a half a world away. To my friends for their support during my entire program, especially Julie Nguyen, Kaisa Dodge, and Michelle Xu. You will always be my sisters at heart. Most importantly, to my mom who without her love, support, and cooking, this thesis could not have been written. Thank you for supporting me in every way possible and for always being my anchor when I feel lost. You are the person I want to make proud in everything that I do.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sustainability of Crayfish Harvesting in Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar
    The sustainability of crayfish harvesting in Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar Julia Patricia Gordon Jones A dissertation submitted to the University of Cambridge in application for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy St John’s College June 2004 Author’s declaration This dissertation is my own work and contains nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration with others, except as specified in the text and acknowledgements. The text does not exceed 300 pages and no part has been submitted for another degree or diploma. Julia Patricia Gordon Jones St John’s College i Abstract Madagascar’s freshwater crayfish, belonging to the endemic genus Astacoides, are harvested throughout their range in the eastern highlands of the country. They provide an important source of protein and revenue to local communities but there is concern that the harvest may be unsustainable. In this thesis I assess the sustainability of crayfish harvesting in and around Ranomafana National Park, an area well known for its reliance on crayfish harvesting. Six taxa (belonging to four described species) are found in the Ranomafana area. Most families in villages with access to forest carry out some harvesting for subsistence use. Due to variation in local taboos (fady) and in access to forest, commercial crayfish harvesting is very important in only three of the 27 villages I visited. However, in these villages crayfish revenue is very important, particularly to poorer households. One species, Astacoides granulimanus, dominates the harvest: more than 95% of crayfish caught in the harvesting village of Vohiparara are of this species. I used a mark-and-recapture study involving more than 26,000 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Folk Taxonomy of Reef Fish and the Value of Participatory Monitoring in Wakatobi National Park, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia Duncan May1
    18 SPC Traditional Marine Resource Management and Knowledge Information Bulletin #18 – August 2005 Folk taxonomy of reef fish and the value of participatory monitoring in Wakatobi National Park, southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia Duncan May1 Introduction PM is its ability to address complexity vs cost issues inherent to most fisheries surveys (Wilson This study presents an etymological examination et al. 1994) and specifically tropical nearshore fish- of folk taxa of nearshore fish caught around eries (Poizat and Baran 1997; Johannes 1998). Kaledupa Island, in Wakatobi National Park Participatory monitoring can take the form of log (WNP), Indonesia. Translations of Bajo and Palo books or creel surveys, which offer a low cost fish taxa presented here provide a basis for fish- alternative to fisheries-independent methods such eries studies in WNP, and have already assisted as underwater visual censes. Log books require a participatory monitoring (PM) by trained fishers. high level of literacy, which is not present among The suitability of folk taxa for monitoring and Indonesian artisanal fishers. However, creel sur- analysis, and the ability of PM to stimulate veys utilising key members of the community who appropriate fisheries management are discussed can interact with all fishers, can generate data on in the context of Indonesia. effort, technique, total catch and length frequency of folk taxa. The value of folk taxa knowledge and participatory monitoring Participatory monitoring, in association with other management actions, can engender a strong com- As a prerequisite to fisheries surveys, ethnographic mitment to conservation and co-management. It data need to be collected — a process that can also places coral reef management within the cul- unearth a wealth of local knowledge on the biology tural framework of fisher communities, address- and ecology of species, and technical fishing details ing community requirements by creating a (Johannes 1978, 1981; Ruddle 1994; McClanahan et demand for resource use education, local invest- al.
    [Show full text]