DOCSLIB.ORG

Access Services Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Access Services Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Access Services Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ADA Paratransit Compliance Review Final Report September 2018 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration FTA ADA Paratransit Compliance Review: Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Final Report September 2018 This page has been intentionally left blank to facilitate duplex printing FTA ADA Paratransit Compliance Review: Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Final Report September 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1 General Information ................................................................................................................................. 3 2 Jurisdiction and Authorities ..................................................................................................................... 5 3 Purpose and Objectives ............................................................................................................................ 7 3.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Objectives ..................................................................................................................................... 7 4 Introduction to SEPTA ............................................................................................................................ 9 4.1 Complementary Paratransit Services and Organizational Structure ............................................. 9 5 Scope and Methodology......................................................................................................................... 11 5.1 Scope ........................................................................................................................................... 11 5.2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 12 5.3 Stakeholder Interviews ................................................................................................................ 14 6 Findings and Advisory Comments ......................................................................................................... 15 6.1 Comparable Complementary Paratransit Service ....................................................................... 15 6.2 Paratransit Eligibility Process ..................................................................................................... 15 Absence of Administrative Burdens ................................................................................................... 15 Paratransit Eligibility Standards .......................................................................................................... 16 Accessible Information ....................................................................................................................... 20 Eligibility Determinations or Presumptive Eligibility Within 21 Days .............................................. 20 Written Eligibility Determinations Including Specific Reasons for Denials or Temporary or Conditional Eligibility Determinations ............................................................................................... 22 Recertification of Eligibility at Reasonable Intervals ......................................................................... 23 Administrative Appeal Process for Denials or Decisions Granting Conditional or Temporary Eligibility ............................................................................................................................................ 24 Complementary Paratransit for Visitors ............................................................................................. 26 6.3 Types of Service ......................................................................................................................... 27 6.4 Service Criteria for Complementary Paratransit ......................................................................... 28 Service Area ........................................................................................................................................ 28 Response Time .................................................................................................................................... 29 Fares .................................................................................................................................................... 31 No Trip Purpose Restrictions .............................................................................................................. 31 Hours and Days of Service.................................................................................................................. 32 Absence of Capacity Constraints ........................................................................................................ 32 No Restrictions on the Number of Trips Provided to ADA Paratransit Eligible Individuals ............. 32 No Waiting List for Access to the Service .......................................................................................... 32 FTA ADA Paratransit Compliance Review: Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Final Report September 2018 No Substantial Numbers of Significantly Untimely Pickups for Initial or Return Trips .................... 33 No Substantial Numbers of Trip Denials or Missed Trips .................................................................. 34 No Substantial Numbers of Trips With Excessive Trip Lengths ........................................................ 36 No Operational Patterns or Practices Limiting the Availability of Service to ADA Paratransit Eligible Individuals ............................................................................................................................. 37 6.5 Subscription Service ................................................................................................................... 38 6.6 Reasonable Policies for Proposed Service Suspensions for Missing Scheduled Trips and the Right to Appeal ........................................................................................................................... 39 6.7 Complaint Resolution and Compliance Information .................................................................. 41 6.8 Nondiscrimination ....................................................................................................................... 42 6.9 Training Requirements ................................................................................................................ 43 6.10 Service Under Contract with a Private Entity ............................................................................. 44 6.11 Service Provided by Another Public Entity ................................................................................ 45 6.12 Coordination of Service .............................................................................................................. 45 Summary Table of Compliance Review Findings ...................................................................................... 47 Attachments A FTA Notification Letter to SEPTA B SEPTA Response Letter to Draft Report C SEPTA Appeal Process D SEPTA Conditions of Eligibility E Customer No-Show/Cancellation Policy FTA ADA Paratransit Compliance Review: Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Final Report September 2018 Executive Summary Objective and Methodology This report reviews the complementary paratransit service of Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA), serving the City of Philadelphia and four surrounding Pennsylvania counties (Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery). It verifies whether this service is meeting SEPTA’s obligations under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements to provide paratransit as a complement to fixed route service. This compliance review included three stages: 1. Preparation: compilation of information covering policies and procedures and interviews with eligible SEPTA paratransit riders and local disability organizations 2. Site visit: a three-person review team’s observation of SEPTA’s paratransit trip requests including scheduling and dispatching, examination of eligibility applications and related documents (including appeals), and interviews with SEPTA and contractor employees 3. Analysis and reporting: identification of deficiencies requiring corrective actions and suggestions of effective practices in complementary paratransit service SEPTA’s complementary paratransit service includes the following positive program elements: Positive Program Elements • SEPTA has a thorough eligibility determination program, with SEPTA staff conducting all tasks in the initial determinations. • SEPTA’s complaint resolution is comprehensive and well documented. • Pickup performance in SEPTA’s suburban counties exceeds the on-time performance standard. The following administrative deficiencies are easily correctable to bring its program into compliance with 49 CFR Parts 27, 37 and 38: Administrative Deficiencies • Policies and public information for service to visitors are not consistent or clear. • The complementary paratransit service area does not cover all areas served by fixed route. • Some
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brooklyn Transit Primary Source Packet
    BROOKLYN TRANSIT PRIMARY SOURCE PACKET Student Name 1 2 INTRODUCTORY READING "New York City Transit - History and Chronology." Mta.info. Metropolitan Transit Authority. Web. 28 Dec. 2015. Adaptation In the early stages of the development of public transportation systems in New York City, all operations were run by private companies. Abraham Brower established New York City's first public transportation route in 1827, a 12-seat stagecoach that ran along Broadway in Manhattan from the Battery to Bleecker Street. By 1831, Brower had added the omnibus to his fleet. The next year, John Mason organized the New York and Harlem Railroad, a street railway that used horse-drawn cars with metal wheels and ran on a metal track. By 1855, 593 omnibuses traveled on 27 Manhattan routes and horse-drawn cars ran on street railways on Third, Fourth, Sixth, and Eighth Avenues. Toward the end of the 19th century, electricity allowed for the development of electric trolley cars, which soon replaced horses. Trolley bus lines, also called trackless trolley coaches, used overhead lines for power. Staten Island was the first borough outside Manhattan to receive these electric trolley cars in the 1920s, and then finally Brooklyn joined the fun in 1930. By 1960, however, motor buses completely replaced New York City public transit trolley cars and trolley buses. The city's first regular elevated railway (el) service began on February 14, 1870. The El ran along Greenwich Street and Ninth Avenue in Manhattan. Elevated train service dominated rapid transit for the next few decades. On September 24, 1883, a Brooklyn Bridge cable-powered railway opened between Park Row in Manhattan and Sands Street in Brooklyn, carrying passengers over the bridge and back.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Transportation Authority New York City
    CASE STUDY Metropolitan Transportation Authority New York City In 2019, Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) released a tender to Shared Mobility providers to develop a new scalable and sustainable on-demand transit proposal. At a glance Liftango was engaged by the MTA for a The MTA network comprises the nation’s simulation service to predict the uptake largest bus fleet and more subway and for an implemented on-demand service. commuter rail cars than all other U.S. Liftango’s simulation technology was transit systems combined. The MTA’s provided to MTA as a benchmark to operating agencies are MTA New York City measure the realism and efficiency of Transit, MTA Bus, Long Island Rail Road, tender proposals from shared mobility Metro-North Railroad, and MTA Bridges and providers. Essentially, enabling MTA to Tunnels. make an educated decision on whom they should choose as their on-demand provider. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority is North America’s largest transportation network, serving a population of 15.3 million people across a 5,000-square-mile travel area surrounding New York City through Long Island, southeastern New York State, and Connecticut. 01 The Problem MTA needed to provide a one of the largest growing As MTA’s first time launching better transport solution sectors in the next five to ten this type of project, there to the people of New York years. The census shows was some risk surrounding City’s outer areas. Why? that a number of people are launch. By engaging Liftango, Existing bus services being leaving for work between 3-6 the aim was to mitigate risk, less frequent than a subway pm and therefore returning simulate possible outcomes service or completely during the overnight period.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern California Rapid Transit District (SCRTD)
    Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Law ---------------------------------------------------------------------- With corresponding provisions of the Southern California Rapid Transit District Law and Los Angeles County Transportation Commission Law Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority California Public Utilities Code Page 2 of 110 Introduction The Southern California Rapid Transit District, also known as the SCRTD or the “District” (1964-1993) was created by the State as the successor to the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority or “LAMTA” (1958-1964). LAMTA was the first publicly governed transit operator in Los Angeles and also responsible for the planning of a new mass transit system to replace the aging remnants of the transit systems built by Pacific Electric (1899-1953) and Los Angeles Railway (1895-1945). Unfortunately, the LAMTA had no ability to raise tax revenues or powers of eminent domain, and its board was appointed by the Governor, making the task building local support for mass transit improvements difficult at best. Dissatisfaction with the underpowered LAMTA led to a complete re-write of its legislative authority. While referred to in state legislation as a merger, the District law completely overwrote the LAMTA Act of 1957. The Los Angeles County Transportation Commission, also known as LACTC or the “Commission” (1977-1993) was created by the State in 1976 as a separate countywide transportation planning agency, along with transportation commissions in San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange counties. At the time the District was initially created, there were no transit or transportation grant programs available from the State or Federal governments. Once funding sources became available from the Urban Mass Transit Administration, now the Federal Transit Administration, the California Transportation Commission, and others, the creation of county transportation commissions ensured coordination of multimodal transportation planning and funding programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Intercity Bus Planning Process
    The 2018 South Carolina Intercity Bus Program Evaluation Prepared for the South Prepared by: Carolina Department of RLS & Associates, Inc. Transportation, Office of Public Transit December, 2018 955 Park St, Room 201 –POBox 191 Columbia, SC 29202 (803) 737‐2146 https://www.scdot.org/inside/inside-PublicTransit.aspx#services Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Statutory Requirements ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Work Program ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 South Carolina Intercity Busy Service ........................................................................................................................ 1 State’s Intercity Bus Needs ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Section 5311(f) Funding Recommendations........................................................................................................... 2 II. Project Background and Context ............................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Buses: a Case Study of the Delaware Authority For
    LIFE-CYCLE COST AND EMISSIONS ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVE- FUEL BUSES: A CASE STUDY OF THE DELAWARE AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSIT (DART) by Amirhossein Shahpar A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Civil Engineering Summer 2010 Copyright 2010 Amirhossein Shahpar All Rights Reserved LIFE-CYCLE COST AND EMISSIONS ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVE- FUEL BUSES: A CASE STUDY OF THE DELAWARE AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSIT (DART) by Amirhossein Shahpar Approved: __________________________________________________________ Ardeshir Faghri, Ph.D. Professor in charge of thesis on behalf of the Advisory Committee Approved: __________________________________________________________ Harry Shenton III, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Approved: __________________________________________________________ Michael Chajes, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Engineering Approved: __________________________________________________________ Debra Hess Norris, M.S. Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Ardeshir Faghri for his encouragement, patience, and guidance throughout the course of my graduate study. His comments and advice not only helped me to stay on track but also assisted me to get the most out of my time at the University of Delaware. I would like to thank Mr. Mark Glaze, Delaware Department of Transportation’s project manager and Mr. Brett Taylor, Delaware Department of Transportation’s financial and legislative policy advisor, for their comments and suggestions on my research work. I am thankful for Mr. Stephen Kingsberry, Executive Director of DART, for his patience and providing the necessary information for this study. His advice also was invaluable and helped me to make right assumptions whenever needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Philadelphia
    GUIDE TO PHILADELPHIA EAT POP-UPS FOR TASTY BITES EXPLORE THE CITY OF PUBLIC ART 3728 Windy Bush Road New Hope, PA 18938 PLAY PHILLY FOR -iÌ>Li>ÕÌvÕÇ°x>VÀiÃÌÃÌÃ>>}wViÌÀiV ÃÌÞiiÃÌ>Ìi°/ à ivi>ÌÕÀiÃ>«i OLD SOULS yiÝLiyÀ«>vi>ÌÕÀ}>>ÃÌiÀV iv½ÃÌV i]>ÌÜÃÌÀÞVÌ>}>}>ÃÃ`}À]>wÀÃÌ & BEACH BUMS yÀ>ÃÌiÀÃÕÌi]>ë>VÕÃ}Ài>ÌÀÜÌ > }à *ÕLÉLÕÌL>À]>{³V>À}>À>}iV«iÝ] >`ÃÕV Àit ÛiÀÞÕÝÕÀÞ>`VvÀÌ>ÃLiiVÃ`iÀi`vÀÌ`>Þ½Ã`iÀÛ}°/ à LÀi>Ì Ì>}v>ÞV«Õ`vviÀëÀÛ>VÞ]µÕ>ÌÞ>`ÕÝÕÀÞ>`i>ÃiÌÌ}° ÝVÕÃÛiÞÃÌi`>ÌfÓ]{]äää CARYN BLACK Ƃ-" ,Ƃ6/< ÓÈÇ°È£{°È{n{ ÓÈÇ°ÎÓ{°{£{£ JULY 2018 >ÀÞ >VJÕÀvÃðV [email protected] ÜÜÜ° >ÀÞ >V°V www.RealtorJK.com wheretraveler.com ÕÀvÃÃ-Ì iLÞ½ÃÌiÀ>Ì>,i>ÌÞN£ÈΣVÕÃÌ-ÌÀiiÌ-ÕÌiÎää* >`i« >]*Ƃ££äÎN >V "vvViÃ`i«i`iÌÞÜi`E«iÀ>Ìi` Philadelphia 07.18 CONTENTS SEE MORE OF PHILADELPHIA AT WHERETRAVELER.COM the plan the guide 02 Editor’s Itinerary 10 SHOPPING The essential things to see XX and do in Philadelphia, plus Top spots to shop, from a 90-minute visit to a family- department stores to friendly riverside attraction. independent boutiques 04 Where Calendar 17 GALLERIES & Hot Dates This Month XX ANTIQUES Top things to do in July. Paintings, photography, “Covenant” (1974) sculptures, antiques, plus 9 Alexander Liberman exhibitions to see now 21 DINING XX Morgan’s Pier Beer Garden Tasty Philly restaurants, from fine dining to fast casual, in more than a dozen neighborhoods XX 28 ENTERTAINMENT 40 Philadelphia Your Way Fun bars, hip lounges, world- Our picks for seeing the city class theater and many more with the gals, old souls, beach ways to enjoy the arts lovers—or all three.
    [Show full text]
  • Paratransit Contracting and Service Delivery Methods
    T R A N S I T C O O P E R A T I V E R E S E A R C H P R O G R A M SPONSORED BY The Federal Transit Administration TCRP Synthesis 31 Paratransit Contracting and Service Delivery Methods A Synthesis of Transit Practice Transportation Research Board National Research Council TCRP OVERSIGHT AND TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1998 PROJECT SELECTION COMMITTEE OFFICERS CHAIRMAN Chairwoman: SHARON D. BANKS, General Manager, AC Transit, Oakland, California MICHAEL S. TOWNES Vice Chair: WAYNE SHACKELFORD, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Transportation Peninsula Transportation District Executive Director: ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR., Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Commission Washington, D.C. MEMBERS MEMBERS BRIAN J.L. BERRY, Lloyd Viel Berkner Regental Professor, Bruton Center for Development Studies, University SHARON D. BANKS of Texas at Dallas AC Transit SARAH C. CAMPBELL, President, TransManagement Inc., Washington, D.C LEE BARNES E. DEAN CARLSON, Secretary, Kansas Department of Transportation Barwood Inc JOANNE F. CASEY, President, Intermodal Association of North America, Greenbelt, Maryland GERALD L. BLAIR JOHN W. FISHER, Director, ATLSS Engineering Research Center. Lehigh University Indiana County Transit Authority GORMAN GILBERT, Director, Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State SHIRLEY A. DELIBERO University New Jersey Transit Corporation DELON HAMPTON, Chairman & CEO, Delon Hampton & Associates, Washington, D.C., ROD J. DIRIDON LESTER A. HOEL, Hamilton Professor, University of Virginia, Department of Civil Engineering (Past Chair, International Institute for Surface 1986) Transportation Policy Study JAMES L. LAMMIE, Director, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc., New York SANDRA DRAGGOO THOMAS F. LARWIN, San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board CATA BRADLEY L.
    [Show full text]
  • DOT Is Committed to Ensuring That
    Signed and Anticipated Capital Investment Grant (CIG) Funding Agreements Since 1/20/2017 FTA has advanced funding for 41 new CIG projects throughout the nation under this Administration since January 20, 2017, totaling approximately $10.7 billion in funding commitments. Date Signed by CIG Funding Project Name Project Sponsor Mode Total Project Cost FTA Commitments 1 Caltrain Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (CA) Caltrain Commuter rail 5/23/2017 $1,930,670,934 $647,000,000 2 Purple Line LRT (MD) Maryland Transit Administration Light rail 8/22/2017 $2,407,030,286 $900,000,000 3 Laker Line BRT (MI) Interurban Transit Partnership BRT 2/9/2018 $72,761,922 $56,189,668 4 Jacksonville First Coast Flyer BRT East Corridor (FL) Jacksonville Transportation Authority BRT 2/23/2018 $34,009,455 $16,930,000 5 Prospect MAX BRT (MO) Kansas City Area Transportation Authority BRT 4/9/2018 $55,810,330 $29,890,000 6 Everett Swift II BRT (WA) Community Transit BRT 4/9/2018 $73,631,772 $43,190,000 7 SMART Regional Rail - San Rafael to Larkspur Extension (CA) Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit Commuter rail 4/9/2018 $55,435,057 $20,032,873 8 IndyGo Red Line (IN) Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation BRT 5/14/2018 $96,329,980 $74,989,685 9 Tacoma Link Extension (WA) Sound Transit Light rail 5/15/2018 $214,613,395 $74,999,999 10 Albuquerque Rapid Transit (NM) ABQ Ride BRT 8/30/2018 $133,671,298 $75,035,549 11 Santa Ana Streetcar (CA) Orange County Transportation Authority Streetcar 11/30/2018 $407,759,966 $148,955,409 12 Lynnwood Link (WA) Sound
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Rail
    STATION LOCATIONS CONNECTING SERVICES * SATURDAYS, SUNDAYS and MAJOR HOLIDAYS PHILADELPHIA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TERMINALS E and F 37, 108, 115 )DUH 6HUYLFHV 7UDLQ1XPEHU AIRPORT INFORMATION AIRPORT TERMINALS C and D 37, 108, 115 =RQH Ê*Ë6WDWLRQV $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 $0 D $LUSRUW7HUPLQDOV( ) TERMINAL A - EAST and WEST AIRPORT TERMINAL B 37, 108, 115 REGIONAL RAIL AIRPORT $LUSRUW7HUPLQDOV& ' D American Airlines International & Caribbean AIRPORT TERMINAL A EAST 37, 108, 115 D $LUSRUW7HUPLQDO% British Airways AIRPORT TERMINAL A WEST 37, 108, 115 D $LUSRUW7HUPLQDO$ LINE EASTWICK (DVWZLFN Qatar Airways 37, 68, 108, 115 To/From Center City Philadelphia D 8511 Bartram Ave & D 3HQQ0HGLFLQH6WDWLRQ Eastern Airlines PENN MEDICINE STATION & DDWK6WUHHW6WDWLRQ ' TERMINAL B 3149 Convention Blvd 40, LUCY & DD6XEXUEDQ6WDWLRQ ' 215-580-6565 Effective September 5, 2021 & DD-HIIHUVRQ6WDWLRQ ' American Airlines Domestic & Canadian service MFL, 9, 10, 11, 13, 30, 31, 34, 36, 30th STREET STATION & D7HPSOH8QLYHUVLW\ The Philadelphia Marketplace 44, 49, 62, 78, 124, 125, LUCY, 30th & Market Sts Amtrak, NJT Atlantic City Rail Line • Airport Terminals E and F D :D\QH-XQFWLRQ ² ²² ²² ²² ² ² ² Airport Marriott Hotel SUBURBAN STATION MFL, BSL, 2, 4, 10, 11, 13, 16, 17, DD)HUQ5RFN7& ² 27, 31, 32, 33, 34, 36, 38, 44, 48, 62, • Airport Terminals C and D 16th St
    [Show full text]
  • Lansdale Doylestown Line Public Timetable Layout 4
    SATURDAYS AND SUNDAYS AND MAJOR HOLIDAYS FareServices Train Number 511 515 519 523 527 531 535 539 543 547 551 555 559 563 567 571 575 Zone Ê * Ë Stations AM AM AM AM AM AM PMPMPMPMPMPMPMPMPMPMPM 4 DDDoylestown 6:28 7:28 8:26 9:26 10:26 11:26 12:26 1:26 2:26 3:26 4:26 5:26 6:26 7:26 8:26 9:26 11:26 4 DDDel Val College 6:31 7:31 8:29 9:29 10:29 11:29 12:29 1:29 2:29 3:29 4:29 5:29 6:29 7:29 8:29 9.29 11:29 4 DDNew Britain F6:33 F7:33 F8:31 F9:31 F10:31 F11:31 F12:31 F1:31 F2:31 F3:31 F4:31 F5:31 F6:31 F7:31 F8:31 F9:31 F11:31 4 DDChalfont 6:39 7:39 8:37 9:37 10:37 11:37 12:37 1:37 2:37 3:37 4:37 5:37 6:37 7:37 8:37 9:37 11:37 4 DDColmar 6:45 7:45 8:43 9:43 10:43 11:43 12:43 1:43 2:43 3:43 4:43 5:43 6:43 7:43 8:43 9:43 11:43 4 D Fortuna 6:47 7:47 8:45 9:45 10:45 11:45 12:45 1:45 2:45 3:45 4:45 5:45 6:45 7:45 8:45 9:45 11:45 4 DDLansdale D 6:51 7:51 8:51 9:51 10:51 11:51 12:51 1:51 2:51 3:51 4:51 5:51 6:51 7:51 8:51 9:51 11:51 4 DDPennbrook 6:53 7:53 8:53 9:53 10:53 11:53 12:53 1:53 2:53 3:53 4:53 5:53 6:53 7:53 8:53 9:53 11:53 4 DDNorth Wales 6:56 7:56 8:56 9:56 10:56 11:56 12:56 1:56 2:56 3:56 4:56 5:56 6:56 7:56 8:56 9:56 11:56 3 D Gwynedd Valley 6:59 7:59 8:59 9:59 10:59 11:59 12:59 1:59 2:59 3:59 4:59 5:59 6:59 7:59 8:59 9:59 11:59 3 D Penllyn 7:02 8:02 9:02 10:02 11:02 12:02 1:02 2:02 3:02 4:02 5:02 6:02 7:02 8:02 9:02 10:02 12:02 3 DDAmbler 7:05 8:05 9:05 10:05 11:05 12:05 1:05 2:05 3:05 4:05 5:05 6:05 7:05 8:05 9:05 10:05 12:05 3 DDFort Washington 7:08 8:08 9:08 10:08 11:08 12:08 1:08 2:08 3:08 4:08 5:08 6:08 7:08 8:08 9:08 10:08 12:08 3 D Oreland 7:11 8:11 9:11 10:11 11:11 12:11 1:11 2:11 3:11 4:11 5:11 6:11 7:11 8:11 9:11 10:11 12:11 3 D North Hills 7:12 8:12 9:12 10:12 11:12 12:12 1:12 2:12 3:12 4:12 5:12 6:12 7:12 8:12 9:12 10:12 12:12 3 D Glenside 7:15 8:15 9:15 10:15 11:15 12:15 1:15 2:15 3:15 4:15 5:15 6:15 7:15 8:15 9:15 10:15 12:15 3 DD Jenkintown-Wyncote 7:18 8:18 9:18 10:18 11:18 12:18 1:18 2:18 3:18 4:18 5:18 6:18 7:18 8:18 9:18 10:18 12:18 2 DDMelrose Park —— ———————————— — —12:21 DD TO CENTER CITY 1 Fern Rock T.C.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMONWEALTH of MASSACHUSETTS Data Breach
    COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS CHARLES D. BAKER MIKE KENNEALY GOVERNOR Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND 501 Boylston Street, Suite 5100, Boston, MA 02116 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT KARYN E. POLITO (617) 973-8700 FAX (617) 973-8799 LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR www.mass.gov/consumer EDWARD A. PALLESCHI UNDERSECRETARY Data Breach Notification Report Assigned Date Reported To OCA Organization Name Breach Type Breach Occur at MA Residents SSNBreached Account Drivers Credit Debit Provided Data Mobile Breach Description the Reporting Affected Number Licenses Numbers Credit Encrypted Device Lost Number Entity? Breached Breached Breached Monitoring Stolen 18488 1/2/2021 Anchor General Insurance Electronic Yes 2 Yes Yes Agency, Inc. 18478 1/4/2021 Matson Navigation Company Electronic Yes 375 Yes Yes 18481 1/4/2021 Kingswood Oxford School Electronic 40 Yes Yes 18483 1/4/2021 LineMaster Switch Corp & Electronic Yes 10 Yes Yes Yes Footworks LLC 18485 1/4/2021 Treasure Valley Community Electronic Yes 5 Yes Yes College 18486 1/4/2021 Worcester Community Action Electronic Yes 9 Yes Yes Yes Yes Council, Inc 18487 1/4/2021 Peter Pan Seafoods, Inc. Electronic Yes 1 Yes Yes 18470 1/5/2021 Paddock Publications, Inc. Electronic Yes 15 Yes Yes Yes 18471 1/5/2021 South Country Health Alliance Electronic Yes 17 Yes Yes 18472 1/5/2021 American Express Travel Related Electronic 336 Yes Services Company, Inc. 18473 1/5/2021 Rockland Trust Paper Yes 1 Yes Yes 18475 1/5/2021 Liberty Christian School Electronic 2 Yes Yes 18476 1/5/2021 St. Mary's Credit Union Electronic 4 Yes 18477 1/5/2021 The Village Bank Electronic 1 Yes 18396 1/6/2021 SAVERS BANK Electronic 2 Yes 18456 1/6/2021 Bay Cove Human Services Electronic Yes 1 18457 1/6/2021 Mutual One Bank Electronic 1 Yes 18459 1/6/2021 Mutual One Bank Electronic 1 Yes 18460 1/6/2021 Mutual One Bank Electronic 1 Yes 18461 1/6/2021 BlueCross BlueShield of Electronic 3 Yes Yes Tennessee, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Country State Business
    Spotted Lanternfly Permit Participants These Participants have been trained on and found to be compliant with standards listed in the Order of Quarantine and Treatment regarding Spotted Lanternfly for operating in the quarantine area. The companies listed here have agreed to participate in and comply with the terms and conditions of the Order of Quarantine and Treatment which is designed to stop the movement of Spotted Lanternfly within or out of the current quarantine zone. Country State Business Canada AB 1763579 ON INC Canada AB 624889 BC LTD Canada AB 9958169 CANADA INC/LOHGARH TRANSPORT Canada AB ADMIRAL MERCHANTS MOTOR FREIGHT Canada AB BCD AB TRANSPORT LTD Canada AB CANEDA TRANSPORT LTD Canada AB CARAVAN AB INC Canada AB CBS TRUCKING INC Canada AB CERTARUS LTD Canada AB CODE LOGISTICS LTD Canada AB DAY AND ROSS INC Canada AB GILBERT TRUCKING LTD Canada AB JJ TRANSPORT INC Canada AB LANDSTAR Canada AB LOADSAFE CROSSBORDER FREIGHT INC Canada AB LOADSAFE/SL TRANSPORT LTD Canada AB MULLEN TRUCKING CORP Canada AB NORD-DECK TRANSPORT INC Canada AB SNOWY OWL TRANSPORTATION Canada BC 1063282 BC LTD Canada BC BERRY AND SMITH TRUCKING LTD Canada BC I-5 LOGISTICS SERVICES LTD Canada BC INTERNATIONAL MACHINE TRANSPORT INC Canada BC KDMS HOLDINGS INC Canada BC LODEXO LOGISTICS INC Canada BC MAVEN TRANSPORT LTD Canada BC PISTON TRANSPORT LTD Canada BC POWERLANE LOGISTICS INC Canada BC SKY BLUE TRANSPORT Canada BC SRT LOGISTICS Canada BC SYER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES LTD Canada BC TEN FOUR TRUCKING Canada BC THE DAY & ROSS TRANSPORTATION GROUP
    [Show full text]