DOCSLIB.ORG

Governance of the Norwegian Innovation Policy System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Governance of the Norwegian Innovation Policy System Rapport-6-omslag.qxd 09.11.2004 12:17 Side 1 RAPPORT 6/2004 RAPPORT 6/2004 Governance of the Norwegian innovation policy system Contribution to the OECD MONIT project Svend Otto Remøe in collaboration with Morten Fraas, Aris Kaloudis, Åge Mariussen, Rannveig Røste, Finn Ørstavik and Siri Aanstad Norsk institutt for studier av forskning og utdanning - Governance of the Norwegian innovation policy system Senter for innovasjonsforskning Hegdehaugsveien 31, N-0352 Oslo Tlf. +47 22 59 51 00 • www.nifustep.no Rapport 6-2004m.fm Page 1 Wednesday, November 10, 2004 9:29 AM RAPPORT 6/2004 Svend Otto Remøe in collaboration with Morten Fraas, Aris Kaloudis, Åge Mariussen, Rannveig Røste, Finn Ørstavik and Siri Aanstad Governance of the Norwegian innovation policy system Contribution to the OECD MONIT project Rapport 6-2004m.fm Page 2 Wednesday, November 10, 2004 9:29 AM © NIFU STEP Norsk institutt for studier av forskning og utdanning/ Senter for innovasjonsforskning Hegdehaugsveien 31, 0352 Oslo Rapport 6/2004 ISBN 82–7218–490–7 ISSN 1504–1824 For en presentasjon av NIFU STEPs øvrige publikasjoner, se www.nifustep.no Rapport 6-2004m.fm Page 3 Wednesday, November 10, 2004 9:29 AM Foreword The MONIT project was endorsed by the TIP working party in December 2002. Building on the results of the TIP NIS project, its main objective is to generate knowledge on how to improve innovation policy governance and create a more coherent and comprehensive innovation policy. The focus is on how to achieve a more horizontal innovation policy through co-ordination with non-core po- licy areas, vertical integration and coherence, and new forms of governance and policy making processes. More specifically it studies the foundations for inno- vation policy governance by highlighting issues such as political leadership, building effective co-ordination mechanisms, socio-political foundations for information exchange and policy learning, cultural factors in policy systems and related sources for coherent policy making. The MONIT network consists of 13 countries, all devoted to generate know- ledge to be shared by the others. The MONIT project is organized in 3 work pac- kages (WP): • WP1 consists of a broad analysis and assessment of the national policy pro- files and challenges, as well as of key governance issues; • WP2 includes policy case studies in the areas of information society, sus- tainable development and transport, and regional policy; • WP3 will synthesize the results from WP1 and WP2 and draw the policy implications. STEP is in MONIT studying the Norwegian innovation policy system through several inter-linked studies. A main focus is to better understand the underlying logic of the Norwegian system, its roots in terms of cultural traditions and the main priorities coming out of it. Both mapping studies and more detailed stu- dies of parts of the innovation policy system are therefore covered in the project. Norway is the lead country in this network, while Austria, Finland and Netherlands are co-leads. The Norwegian part of the project is commissioned by the Research Council of Norway (RCN), and funded by this council and the mi- nistries of Science and Education, Trade and Industry and Regional Affairs. The project also consists of a learning arena organized by the users through which re- sults and perspectives generated by MONIT is disseminated and discussed. Oslo, juni 2004 Per Kock Svend Otto Remøe Assistent Director Project Leader 3 Rapport 6-2004m.fm Page 4 Wednesday, November 10, 2004 9:29 AM 4 Rapport 6/2004 Rapport 6-2004m.fm Page 5 Wednesday, November 10, 2004 9:29 AM Table of contents Executive summary ................................................................................... 9 1 Introduction ...................................................................................... 11 1.1 Background: The MONIT project .............................................................. 11 1.2 Interactions in policy systems ..................................................................... 12 1.3 Coherence: A key feature of horizontal innovation policy ..................... 13 1.4 An institutional approach ............................................................................ 14 1.5 The focus of the report ................................................................................. 16 1.6 Methodological considerations ................................................................... 16 2 Historical development of the science and innovation system and governance structure ........................................................................ 18 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 18 2.2 1946 to the late 1970s: State supported development of large-scale industry ....................................................................................... 19 2.3 The 1980s: Growth through new technology and market mechanisms 20 2.4 The 1990s: Searching for a new model ....................................................... 24 2.5 Recent developments: Break through for a broad innovation policy? .. 28 2.6 Towards a 3rd generation innovation policy? ........................................... 31 3 An overview of the current innovation system and the key actors .. 33 3.1 Mapping the actors ....................................................................................... 33 3.2 Three key agencies ........................................................................................ 35 3.3 Support institutions ...................................................................................... 36 4 Perceived policy challenges and policy mix ..................................... 40 4.1 Performance of the STI system ................................................................... 40 4.2 Perceived policy challenges .......................................................................... 43 4.2.1 A methodological note ....................................................................... 43 4.2.2 Challenges ............................................................................................ 44 4.3 Policy mix ....................................................................................................... 56 4.3.1 Current priority areas ......................................................................... 58 4.3.2 Contents and organization of Norwegian innovation policies ..... 58 4.3.3 Framework conditions ....................................................................... 59 4.3.4 Research and development ................................................................ 61 4.3.5 Quality in higher education ............................................................... 62 4.3.6 Commercialization of research results ............................................. 62 4.3.7 Interaction between industry and education/research institutions 63 4.3.8 Company start-ups .............................................................................. 64 4.4 A summary of innovation policy measures ............................................... 64 4.5 Looking ahead: the 2003 Government proposition on instruments for an innovative and creative industry ..................................................... 64 5 Rapport 6-2004m.fm Page 6 Wednesday, November 10, 2004 9:29 AM 5 Agenda setting, prioritisation, and stakeholder involvement ......... 68 5.1 A corporatist system in a macro-economic environment ....................... 68 5.2 The politics of agenda setting ...................................................................... 70 5.2.1 Multi-dimensional tensions ............................................................... 70 5.2.2 Processes in Parliament ...................................................................... 72 5.3 Prioritization in R&D: The role of ministries and RCN .......................... 74 5.4 Innovating a new policy: The case of the tax credit scheme ................... 80 5.5 The need for long term perspectives: The case of the fund for research and innovation ............................................................................... 84 5.6 Innovation in fish farming: Different agendas from different ministries 86 5.7 Setting a new agenda? The Government’s plan for a coherent innovation policy ........................................................................................... 87 5.7.1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 87 5.7.2 Which agenda? .................................................................................... 88 5.7.3 Loosing coherence: Towards prioritization and implementation 91 5.7.4 Inherent contradictions in the policy cycle: A summary analysis 93 6 Co-ordination of policy formulation and implementation ............. 98 6.1 Indicators of horizontalization .................................................................... 98 6.1.1 STI funding in Norway ....................................................................... 99 6.1.2 Measuring coordination in innovation policy agendas ................. 102 6.1.3 Co-ordination practices ..................................................................... 104 6.2 Two levels of R&D policy co-ordination: The role of RFU and GFU ............................................................................ 104 6.2.1 RFU (the Government’s research committee) ................................ 105 6.2.2 DFU (the ministries’ research committee) .....................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Keeping Good Companies • •
    Keeping Good Companies • • A NORWEGIAN ARTISAN ELITE MAKING A LIVELIHOOD Keith Postler The London School of Economics and Political Science PhD (Management) London, 2010 UMI Number: U6157B2 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615732 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 TUt^C5 f British Library of Political and Economic Science Declaration The work presented in this thesis is my own. Keith Postler, 23rd September 2010 Copyright Notice The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the author’s prior written consent. Abstract The thesis examines the establishment of an original business model and the institutions which enable and perpetuate it. An alliance of elite Norwegian artisan builders and interior designers develops the model in catering to a market of bespoke manufacture for Norway’s elite. The thesis argues that the originality of the model derives from the artisans’ creative use and adaptation of institutions in the Norwegian Welfare State and its business and local environment, forming a distinctive entrepreneurial lifestyle that results in a thriving network of companies and in the achievement of‘the good life’.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL ELECTIONS in NORWAY 9Th September 2013
    GENERAL ELECTIONS IN NORWAY 9th September 2013 European Elections monitor The rightwing wins the general elections in Norway The rightwing forces won the general elections that took place in Norway on 9th September. The Corinne Deloy Conservative Party (H) chaired by former Local Affairs and Regional Development Minister (2001- Translated by Helen Levy 2005), Erna Solberg won 26.8% of the vote and 48 seats (+ 18 in comparison with the previous elections on 14th September 2009). The Progress Party (FrP) a populist party led by Siv Jensen won 16.4% of the vote and 29 seats (-12). The Christian Democratic Party (KrF), led by Knut Arild Hareide won 5.6% of the vote and 10 seats (=); the Liberal Party (V) chaired by Trine Skei Grande Results won 5% of the vote and 9 seats (+ 7). Together the rightwing won 54% of the vote and 96 of the 169 seats in the Storting the only cham- ber of parliament. The Labour Party (DNA), led by outgoing Prime Minis- ment coalition chaired by Childcare, Equality and Social ter Jens Stoltenberg who can be pleased at having Integration Minister Audun Lysbakken won 4.1% of the retained its position as the country’s leading party won vote and 7 seats (-4). 30.8% of the vote and 55 seats (-9). The Centre Party The last seat went to the Green Party (MDG) which (Sp), a member of the outgoing government coalition, won 2.8% of the vote. led by Local Affairs Minister Liv Signe Navarsete won Turnout totalled 71.4% i.e. -5 points in comparison 5.5% of the vote and 10 seats (-1) and the Socialist with the general election that took place on 14th Sep- Left Party (SV) also a member of the outgoing govern- tember 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Gjør Endringer Til Fremskritt
    Sannsynligvis ������������������������ ������������������������������� Norges beste ���������������������� CRM-system ������������������������ 815 48 333 – www.vegasmb.no �������������������������������������� Bedre å være kunde – enklere å være deg ��������������� ������������ A-AVIS Nelson Mandela 1. JULI 2005 NR. 25 – 18. ÅRGANG – LØSSALG KR 25 LEDERE LÆR Å TA FERIE! SIDE 30-31 SOM KAN Egil FORANDRE Janne «Drillo» SIDE 26-27 Carlsson Olsen Marit Breivik FOTO: LISE ÅSERUD/SCANPIX FOTO: JANERIK HENRIKSSON, CORNELIUS POPPE, TERJE BRINGEDAL OG ANNA ZIEMINSKI/SCANPIX TOPPSJEFEN FOTO: DAG HÅKONHELLEVIK DAG FOTO: Ohene Aboagye tar det med fatning. Klassens Noen får sjokk når de ser sjefen SIDE 36 EINAR CORNELIUSFOTO: POPPE/SCANPIX HØGETVEIT: beste i Roper ikke «ulv, ulv!» SIDE 21 ledelse Bærekraftig Utdanningsminister Kristin Clemet blir turistprosjekt vurdert som en bedre leder SIDE 20 enn Gro Harlem Brundt- land i Ukeavisen Ledelses serie LEDERFOKUS «Toppsjefen». «Vi imiterer forbilder SIDE 28-29 eBay-gründeren: enten vi er klar over – Det oser vilje, gjennomfør- det eller ikke.» ingskraft og taktisk klokskap av Kristin Clemet, skriver redaktør Vil gi tilbake til SIDE 34 Magne Lerø i sin kommentar. samfunnetSIDE 28-29 FOTO: CORNELIUSFOTO: POPPE/SCANPIX You need an advantage Gjør endringer You need AGRESSO til fremskritt ... For mer informasjon: nå! Tlf. 22 58 85 00 [email protected] Business Information Systems www.agresso.no 2 NR. 25 – FREDAG 1. JULI 2005 – UKEAVISEN LEDELSE Sjekket e-post ETIKK4I forbindelse med smøreskan- dalen i Vinmonopolet lot ledelsen de ansattes e-post bli sjekket. Et data- fi rma ble i løpet av to netter i februar SISTE UKE TERJE FOTO: BENDIKSBY/SCANPIX satt til å kopiere alle disker, e-postser- vere og fi lservere.
    [Show full text]
  • Test-Based Accountability in the Norwegian Context: Exploring Drivers, Expectations and Strategies
    Journal of Education Policy ISSN: 0268-0939 (Print) 1464-5106 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tedp20 Test-based accountability in the Norwegian context: exploring drivers, expectations and strategies Marjolein K. Camphuijsen, Jorunn Møller & Guri Skedsmo To cite this article: Marjolein K. Camphuijsen, Jorunn Møller & Guri Skedsmo (2020): Test-based accountability in the Norwegian context: exploring drivers, expectations and strategies, Journal of Education Policy, DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2020.1739337 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1739337 Published online: 11 Mar 2020. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tedp20 JOURNAL OF EDUCATION POLICY https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1739337 Test-based accountability in the Norwegian context: exploring drivers, expectations and strategies Marjolein K. Camphuijsen a, Jorunn Møller b and Guri Skedsmo b,c aDepartment of Sociology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; bDepartment of Teacher Education and School Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; cInstitute for Research on Professions and Professional Learning, Schwyz University of Teacher Education, Goldau, Switzerland ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY This paper investigates how and why test-based accountability (TBA), Received 16 May 2019 a global model for education reform, began to dominate educational Accepted 2 March 2020 debates in Norway in the early 2000s, and how this policy has been KEYWORDS operationalised and institutionalised over time. In examining the adop- Globalisation; education tion and retention of TBA in Norway, we build on the cultural political policy; standardised testing; economy framework, in combination with a political sociology-driven test-based accountability; approach to policy instruments.
    [Show full text]
  • Stein Kuhnle Professor of Comparative Politics University of Bergen Status: February 2011
    June 25, 2021 Curriculum Vitae Stein Kuhnle Professor of Comparative Politics University of Bergen Status: February 2011 PERSONAL DATA Birth: Bergen, Norway, 22 November 1947. Citizenship: Norwegian. Private address: Boenesskogen 205, N-5154 Boenes, Norway Mobile phone: +47 92492279 Email address: [email protected] EDUCATION Cand. polit. Degree in Comparative Politics, University of Bergen, Norway, 1973. Dissertation: "Social Mobilization and Political Participation: The Nordic Countries c. 1850-1970". ACADEMIC POSITIONS Professor of Comparative Politics, University of Bergen (August 1982 – November 2017); Emeritus Professor, University of Bergen (December 2017 – lifetime); Professor of Comparative Social Policy, Hertie School, The University of Governance, Berlin (Jan. 2006 – Dec.2013); Emeritus Professor, Hertie School, The University of Governance, Berlin (January 2014- lifetime); Adjunct Professor, Stein Rokkan Centre, Bergen (January 2002 - December 2005) ; Adjunct Professor, Centre for Social Research, Bergen (May 1999 - December 2001); Research Director, Program on Welfare State Research, Norwegian Research Council for Applied Social Sciences (January 1988 - December 1994) ; Professor, Gastprofessur "Westeuropa", University of Mannheim (March - August 1987); Associate Professor of Sociology, University of Bergen (January 1979 - July 1982); University Fellow, University of Bergen (January 1976-December 1978); Research Assistant, University of Bergen (1972-1975) VISITING FELLOWSHIPS Visiting Professor, Soka University, Tokyo, 1
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 1330 Møte Onsdag Den 12. Januar Kl. 10 President: Inge
    1330 12. jan. – Ordinær spørretime 2005 Møte onsdag den 12. januar kl. 10 «Gjennom media har det fremkommet at det er plan- lagt å legge ned de meteorologiske stasjonene på Jan President: Inge Lønning Mayen og Hopen på Svalbard. Mener utdannings- og forskningsministeren dette er Dagsorden (nr. 36): klokt med tanke på bl.a. håndhevelsen av den 200 mils 1. Spørretime fiskerigrensen og Norges ansvar for klimaforskning?» – ordinær spørretime (nr. 8) 2. Referat Statsråd Kristin Clemet [10:04:21]: Spørsmålet fra representanten Konglevoll ble opprinnelig stilt til uten- riksministeren. Grunnen til at jeg besvarer spørsmålet, er Sak nr. 1 at Meteorologisk institutt forvaltes av Utdannings- og Spørretime forskningsdepartementet. Bakgrunnen for medieoppsla- – ordinær spørretime gene som representanten viser til, er et forslag Meteoro- logisk institutt fremmet overfor eget styre nå i høst. For- Presidenten: Det blir noen endringer i den oppsatte slaget gikk ut på å nedlegge virksomheten på Jan Mayen spørsmålslisten, og presidenten viser i den sammenheng og Hopen i 2005. Instituttet har begrunnet dette forslaget til den oversikt som er omdelt på representantenes plasser med frykt for at infrastrukturen på Jan Mayen vil forsvin- i salen. ne når Loran C legges ned ved utgangen av inneværende De foreslåtte endringer i dagens spørretime foreslås år. Denne infrastrukturen er en forutsetning for Meteoro- godkjent. – Det anses vedtatt. logisk institutts virksomhet på øya. Meteorologisk institutt har nå trukket forslaget, og in- Endringene var som følger: stituttets styre har vedtatt å opprettholde virksomheten på Spørsmål 1, fra representanten Vidar Bjørnstad til Jan Mayen og Hopen i 2005. Hovedgrunnen til dette er statsministeren, er trukket tilbake.
    [Show full text]
  • Svalbard Innmat
    International Conference on Climate Change Research in the Arctic – Future Challenges Svalbard, 25 – 27 July 2003 Conference statement by the Science Commitee Stensbergg. 26 Box 2700 St. Hanshaugen N–0131 OSLO ISBN 82-12-01869-5 In addition to a broad European representration from the leading research groups and institutions in the field of Climate Change, accompanied by research representatives from Asia and North-America, there were high-level political representation from Norway, EU and USA. From the left: The Norwegian Minister for Research and Education, Kristin Clemet, Executive Director Kathie Olsen from the Office of Science and Technology Policy, White House, USA and the EU Commissioner, Philippe Busquin, European Commission. (Photo: Mona Gravningen Rygh) Cover photo: The glacier front (Nordenskiöldbreen in Billefjorden), The picture was taken during one of the conference field trips. International Conference on Climate Change Research in the Arctic – Challenges for Science and Research Policy Svalbard, 25 – 27 July 2003 Conference statement and recommendations by the Science Committee © Research Council of Norway 2003 Research Council of Norway Box 2700 St. Hanshaugen N–0131 Oslo Phone : 22 03 70 00 Fax: 22 03 70 01 This publication can be ordered via the Internet from: http://www.forskningsradet.no/bibliotek/publikasjonsdatabase/ or via the toll free fax number: 800 83 001 This report can be downloaded from http://www.forskningsradet.no/bibliotek/publikasjonsdatabase/ E-mail: [email protected] Home page : http://www.forskningsradet.no/ Graphic design cover: Creuna as Photo credits for cover photo: Mona Gravningen Rygh Cover printed by: Allkopi Impression: 900 copies Oslo, November 2003 ISBN 82-12-01869-5 (print) ISBN 82-12-01870-9 (pdf) It was an honour to host the International Conference on Climate Change in the Arctic organised on Svalbard this summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilderberger Is the the Group Which Created For
    BILDERBERGER IS THE THE GROUP WHICH CREATED FOR THE PURPOSE TO IMPLEMENT THE GLOBAL PLAN OF THE CABAL & SET IT INTO MOTION & ACTION BY USING THESE FINANCE GEOPOLITICAL PLATFORMS & MASSMEDIO, REPRESENTED BY THOSE WHO ATTENDED & REPRESENTED THEIR COUNTRY. AND WHEN THEY ARRIVED HOME THEY SET IT INTO MOTION AS A POLITICAL PROPOSAL WITH THE AGENDA TO CHANGE THE LAW OR IMPLEMENT A NEW SOCIAL STRUCTURES & RULES FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE ELITE, CABAL, BANKES & CORPORATIONS. THEY ARE JUST PUPPETS FOR THE CABAL AGENDA. NOW THESE INTERNATIONAL LEADERS WILL BE ARRESTED, AS THEY REPRESENT CRIMINAL ACTIONS AGAINST THE HUMAN POPULATION & BREAKINFG THE COMMON LAW AND THE UNIVERSAL LAW WICH FURTHE HAS BEEN REFERCED TO AS THE EVENT AND MASSARRESTS. THIS IS JUST AS SMALL PART OF THE EVENT. Here you find the the finance geopolitical elite in Norway which has joined the force of the criminal corrupted cabal, mostly through the structure of BILDERBERG GROUP and FREEMASON but others aswell. Norwegian Bilderberger in the period from the period of 1991 and forward Arcived under: Bilderberger, Brundtland, Eu, Jensen, Myklebust, NWO, Rockefeller, Siv, Stoltenberg on april 23, 2007 at 1:33 am http://21917.vgb.no/2007/04/23/norske-bilderbergere/ Infor from the website: http://www.bilderberg.org/1991.htm 1991: Arne Olav Bruntland (Professor) Per Ditlev-Simonsen (Businessman) Niels Warring (Banker) 1993: Erik G.; Managing Director and CEO, Braathens SAFE Westye Hoegh; Chairman of the Board, Leif Hoegh & Co AS Niels Warring; Director, Wilh. Wilhelmson Limited AS 1994: Westye Hoegh, chairman of the board, Leif Hoegh & Co. AS; president, Norwegian Shipowners’ Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Entire Country Regional and Innovation Policy Coordination in Norway
    MONIT monitoring and implementing horizontal innovation policy Development of the Entire Country Regional and Innovation Policy Coordination in Norway Åge Mariussen and Morten Fraas WORKING PAPER MONIT is a collaborative project in the context of OECD to explore national capabilities in innovation policy and governance in the innovation driven economy For more information, see www.step.no/monit/ Oslo, 13.08.04 1. Foreword The MONIT project was endorsed by the TIP working party in December 2002. Building on the results of the TIP NIS project, its main objective is to generate knowledge on how to improve innovation policy governance and create a more coherent and comprehensive innovation policy. The focus is on how to achieve a more horizontal innovation policy through co-ordination with non-core policy areas, vertical integration and coherence, and new forms of governance and policy making processes. More specifically it studies the foundations for innovation policy governance by highlighting issues such as political leadership, building effective co-ordination mechanisms, socio-political foundations for information exchange and policy learning, cultural factors in policy systems and related sources for coherent policy making. The MONIT network consists of 13 countries, all devoted to generate knowledge to be shared by the others. The MONIT project is organized in 3 work packages (WP): • WP1 consists of a broad analysis and assessment of the national policy profiles and challenges, as well as of key governance issues; • WP2 includes policy case studies in the areas of information society, sustainable development and transport, and regional policy; • WP3 will synthesize the results from WP1 and WP2 and draw the policy implications.
    [Show full text]
  • THE STATE OWNERSHIP REPORT 2015 Contents
    THE STATE OWNERSHIP REPORT 2015 Contents Norges sjømatråd AS 92 Norsk Helsenett SF 93 Norsk rikskringkasting AS 94 The Minister’s introduction 3 Category 3 – Commercial and other Norsk Tipping AS 95 Scope and key figures 5 specifically defined objectives NSD – Norsk senter for forskningsdata AS 96 Central matters for the state as owner 9 Aerospace Industrial Maintenance Norway SF 62 Nye Veier AS 97 Return and financial values 13 Argentum Fondsinvesteringer AS 63 Petoro AS 98 Key figures describing financial performance 19 Eksportfinans ASA 64 Rogaland Teater AS 99 Corporate governance 25 Electronic Chart Centre AS 65 Simula Research Laboratory AS 100 Raising the standard for efficient GIEK Kredittforsikring AS 66 Siva – Selskapet for Industrivekst SF 101 and transparent state ownership 36 Investinor AS 67 Space Norway AS 102 Kommunalbanken AS 68 Statnett SF 103 NSB AS 69 Statskog SF 104 Posten Norge AS 70 Staur Gård AS 105 Statkraft AS 71 Store Norske Spitsbergen Kulkompani AS 106 Category 1 – Commercial objectives Talent Norge AS 107 Ambita AS 42 Trøndelag Teater AS 108 Baneservice AS 43 UNINETT AS 109 Entra ASA 44 Universitetssenteret på Svalbard AS 110 Flytoget AS 45 Category 4 – Sector policy objectives AS Vinmonopolet 111 Mesta AS 46 Andøya Space Center AS 74 SAS AB 47 Avinor AS 75 Veterinærmedisinsk Oppdragssenter AS 48 Bjørnøen AS 76 Carte Blanche AS 77 AS Den Nationale Scene 78 Regional health authorities Den Norske Opera & Ballett AS 79 Helse Midt-Norge RHF 114 Eksportkreditt Norge AS 80 Helse Nord RHF 115 Category 2 – Commercial
    [Show full text]
  • 122486 FULLTEXT01.Pdf (2.031Mb)
    Roger Normann Democracy in Development – A Critical View on Regional Governance Thesis for the degree of philosophiae doctor Trondheim, April 2007 Norwegian University of Science and Technology Faculty for Social Sciences and Technology Management Department of Industrial Economy and Technology Mangement NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology Thesis for the degree of philosophiae doctor Faculty for Social Sciences and Technology Management Department of Industrial Economy and Technology Mangement ©Roger Normann ISBN 978-82-471-1934-1-6 (printed ver.) ISBN 978-82-471-1948-8 (electronic ver.) ISSN 1503-8181 Theses at NTNU, 2007:88 Printed by Tapir Uttrykk DEMOCRACY IN DEVELOPMENT Democracy in Development – A Critical View on Regional Governance Thesis for the degree of philosophiae doctor Trondheim, April 2007 Norwegian University of Science and Technology Faculty of Social Sciences and Technology Management Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology Thesis for the degree of philosophiae doctor Faculty of Social Sciences and Technology Management Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management © Roger Normann ISBN 978-82-471-1934-1 (printed ver.) ISBN 978-82-471-1948-8 (electronic ver.) ISSN 1503-8181 Doctoral Theses at NTNU, 2007:88 Printed by Tapir Uttrykk Acknowledgements If I have managed to inspire or provoke just some of the readers of this thesis into giving regional development a second thought and maybe in a slightly different way than before – then I would find satisfaction in knowing that it has been worth the effort… This thesis work has been co-financed through several sources, and I would like to start by giving thanks to the Norwegian Research Council, the national Value Creation 2010 programme, and the two driving forces Pål Lynne Hansen and Bjørn Gustavsen who through the Value Creation 2010 project have financed a significant part of this thesis work.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL ELECTIONS in NORWAY 9Th September 2013
    GENERAL ELECTIONS IN NORWAY 9th September 2013 European Elections monitor The rightwing opposition might return to office thanks to the Norwegian general elections Corinne Deloy Translated by Helen Levy 3.5 million Norwegians will be re-electing their parliament on 9th September next (local councils can open the polling stations on 8th). The time for political alternation may have come to this country which does not seem to have been greatly affected by the international economic crisis. Indeed Oslo has vast natural resources at its disposal which the State manages scrupulously. Norwegians Analysis also have one of the most generous social models in the world. However the country was terribly disrupted by the terrorist attacks committed by Anders Behring Breivik on 22nd July 2011. Just weeks before the general elections the rightwing opposition led by Erna Solberg (Conserva- tive Party, H) seems to be on course to return to office after 8 years of Labour led government. In power since 2005 outgoing Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg (Labour Party, DNA) is vying for a third mandate. His victory would comprise a first in Norwegian history. Early voting started on 10th August last and will go on until 6th September. Ten TV debates have been programmed between 7th August and 8th September, five of which will be between the outgoing Prime Minister and opposition leader Erna Solberg. 1 – PARADISE THREATENED? ry group and a moderate/reformist group) and the bour- geoisie (split into agrarians, conservatives and liberals). a) The political situation Political Norway is structured around six parties which all Norway is an extremely homogenous society focusing on support the Welfare State model and which differ little the principle of equality (likhet), which means similarity from an ideological point of view.
    [Show full text]