15 Years Creates Value | Combats Poverty Content

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

15 Years Creates Value | Combats Poverty Content NORWEGIAN INVESTMENT FUND FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES REPORT ON OPERATIONS 2011 15 years CREATES VALUE | COMBATS POVERTY CONTENT The Norfund History 1 Message from the Managing Director 2 Highlights from 15 Years 4 Between Washington and Beijing Consensus – a Nordic Approach? 9 Norfund – the Little Sister of the DFI-Family 12 Norfund as a Development Investor 13 Strategy for Sustainable Development 14 Investment Areas 16 A Responsible Investor 20 Organization, Management and the Board of Directors 22 Portfolio and Results 25 Portfolio 26 Development Effects 29 Financial Results 30 Accounting Results 32 Activities of the Investment Areas in 2011 33 Renewable Energy 34 Financial Institutions 36 SME-Funds 38 Industrial Partnerships 40 Project Development and New Instruments 42 Overview of all Norfund Investments 44 This is Norfund Bangkok, Thailand Norfund – the Norwegian Investment Fund for Developing Countries – was established by the Norwegian Storting (parliament) in 1997. Norfund’s objectives are to contribute San José, equity and other risk capital, extend loans and Costa Rica provide guarantees for the development of CENTRAL AMERICA SUB SAHARAN AFRICA SOUTHEAST AND SOUTH ASIA sustainable commercial activities in developing • Total investments (NOK m): 3 088 • Total investments (NOK m): 2 597 • Total investments (NOK m): 1 865 countries. Norfund aims to establish viable, • Number of projects: 23 • Number of projects: 58 • Number of projects: 29 profitable activities that would not otherwise • Number of employees: 24 000 • Number of employees:82 000 Nairobi, • Number of employees: 139 000 be initiated due to the high risk involved. • Largest investment area: • Largest investment area: Kenya • Largest investment area: Norfund contributes to economic development Renewable Energy Financial Institutions Renewable Energy and poverty reduction in poor countries through • Countries: Guatemala, • Countries: Kenya, Tanzania, • Countries: Bangladesh, Vietnam, investments in profitable enterprises and El Salvador, Nicaragua, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Laos, Cambodia, Myanmar and the transfer of knowledge and technology. Honduras, Panama and South Sudan, Angola, renewable energy in Nepal Norfund always invests with partners, Costa Rica Namibia, South Africa, Lesotho, Johannesburg, Norwegian or non-Norwegian. Swaziland, Mozambique, South Sudan Zimbabwe, Zambia, Madagascar, Norfund is a hybrid state-owned company and Malawi with limited liability established by a special Investment regions act of the Storting. Norfund is magaged by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the Minister of Norfund’s regional offices International Development has the constitutional responsibility. The activities are to be conducted in accordance with the fundamental principles GEOGRAPHIES INVESTMENT AREAS FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS 3 % of Norwegian development cooperation policy. 8 % The board of directors is appointed by the 41 % 34 % 47 % 54 % King in Council. 18 % 26 % Norfund and our international sister organisations are often referred to as development finance institutions (DFIs). Norfund is supplied with 20 % capital from the official development assistance 24 % 25 % budget, and is the most important Norwegian Africa Asia Renewable Energy SME Funds Equity PE Funds instrument for combating poverty by promoting sustainable economic development. A well functi- Latin America Rest of the world Financial Institutions Industrial Partnerships Loans oning private sector and access to risk capital are Project Development important preconditions for enabling developing countries to expand their economies and achieve KEY FIGURES NORFUND effective integration into the global economy. 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 Geographically, Southern and East Africa are Committed investments (NOK m) 7 581 5 844 5 264 4798 3669 Norfund’s main investment areas, and the Number of investments 99 85 81 69 60 Fund has offices in Nairobi and Johannesburg. New investments in 2011 (NOK m) 2 198 844 944 1376 1177 In 2012 Norfund will also open an office in Share of new investments in least developed countries 14 % 45 % 36 % 43 % 12 % Maputo. Norfund also targets selected countries Return on invested capital 9 % 10 % 4 % 21 % 17 % in South-East Asia and Central America and has Profit in investment currency (NOK m) 0 153 262 238 264 regional offices in San José and Bangkok. Capital supplied by owner (NOK m) 1 000 629 585 485 485 Recorded equity (NOK m) 7 735 6 747 5 871 5302 3919 Number of employees in Norfund 49 45 41 40 35 Number of employees in Norfund investments 265 000 167 000 148 000 158 000 147 000 Norfund 15 Years: Capital and Competencies for Continued Growth Highlights from 15 Years The Norfund Between Washington and Beijing Consensus History – a Nordic Approach? Norfund – the Little Sister of the DFI-Family 15 99 7.6 5 years projects in billion offices portfolio invested Norfund 15 Years: Capital and competencies for continued growth Norfund’s Board of directors and management team at a geothermal plant in Nicaragua With the establishment of Norfund in investors, DFIs are able to attract partners. We have learned that know- 1997, a new chapter was added to the additional private capital. The Norfund ledge about local markets and selected Norwegian development assistance mandate is unchanged since inception: industries are vital, and we have experi- policy. Aid and development assistance To be additional – providing additional enced that the key to success is close, must contribute to value creation, not capital to poor countries beyond what long term collaborations with industrial only value distribution. Profitable industry would happen in the market place, and partners. We are proud to be an active and commerce is the backbone of to be catalytic – attract additional capital owner who adds knowledge and sustainable poverty alleviation. Norfund from private sources. expertise in addition to capital. was established to invest in countries where the need for capital is vast, and in 2012 marks our 15th anniversary. Important strategic milestones have been industry sectors particularly important to Through annual capital allocations and to be the initiating partner in establishing development. good returns, the fund has grown to be a the fund managing company Aureos significant investor in our markets. The Capital together with our British sister In addition to supplying much needed Norfund organization has become a fund CDC in 2001, and the joint venture risk capital, investment funds such as professional and recognized player. The SN Power with Statkraft in 2002. Aureos Norfund (so called Development Finance current strategy is based on the experi- has grown to become the world’s largest Institutions, DFIs) function as catalysts. ences gained from our 15 years of manager of capital targeting small and By demonstrating profitability in our investing in the poorest countries of the medium sized enterprises in emerging portfolio, and always partner with other world and from our 14 European DFI and developing countries. SN Power 2 NORFUNd’s REPORT ON OPERATIONS 2011 A feasible target should be that Norfund in a few years time has grown to one per cent of SPU and SPN. KJELL ROLAND, MANAGING DIRECTOR builds and runs hydropower plants in 8 contribution in development policy. countries. We believe there is a need for developing countries, and produces Today, the recognition of the importance a clearer political ambition for the long electricity equivalent to the consumption of business to development is stronger term role of Norfund. Norfund can deliver of 12 million people. than ever. towards many of the expectations on social and environmental standards that 2011 added to a series of very good Norfund will in the coming years continue the Norwegian government will have to years for Norfund. Important measures to systematically build competencies and live up to as a large portfolio investor in were taken to develop the fund further, capacity for doing difficult investments in global markets.Norfund is in fact the third and financial and developmental results the poorest countries in the world, pillar next to The Government Pension in the projects were good. We launched particularly in Sub Saharan Africa. We are Fund Global (SPU) and the Government a new strategic priority, namely agribusi- convinced that local presence and good Pension Fund Norway (SPN). A feasible ness in Africa, opened a new office in partners are keys to success. We are target should be that Norfund in a few Bangkok and recruited several new ready to do our best in contributing to years time has grown to one per cent of employees to the South Africa and Kenya substantially increased activity towards SPU and SPN. Most likely, these offices to strengthen local presence and development of business in poor investments would yield higher returns skills. In total, Norfund invested in 27 countries. This is more than anything compared to what the pension funds projects, and committed investments what the countries in the South are have achieved over the recent years. adding to a record high NOK 2.2 billion. asking for! A survey from January 2012 demonstra- In this years Report on Operations, we tes that Norfund over the last years has It is particularly important to establish have chosen to highlight important succeeded in explaining to the larger businesses in fragile states. Jobs and milestones from our 15 year investor public what we do and why that is so economic growth mean opportunities history, and to tell our story in connection important, and to become a well known and hope, and are very important to to trends in development assistance and attractive partner in the financial create and maintain stability. Through policy. We also wish to raise awareness community. In particular, our business establishing the investment company about Norfund’s active engagement in partners seem to appreciate the work we Kinyeti Capital in South Sudan, Norfund the development of new projects and do and the way we act as a partner. has taken early steps to develop new instruments, far exceeding that of instruments to support micro and small traditional investors. The investment In international development policy, 2011 enterprises.
Recommended publications
  • Renewable Energy Risking Rights & Returns
    ` RENEWABLE ENERGY RISKING RIGHTS & RETURNS: An analysis of solar, bioenergy and geothermal companies’ human rights commitments SEPTEMBER 2018 CONTENTS CONTENTS Executive summary 1 Introduction 4 Analysis 6 1. Leaders and laggards 6 2. Public commitment to human rights 12 3. Commitment to community consultations 12 4. Access to remedy 14 5. Labour rights 16 6. Supply chain monitoring 17 Recommendations 19 Annex 21 Photo credit: Andreas Gücklhorn/Unsplash EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Key messages Renewable energy is key for our transition to a low-carbon economy, but companies’ human rights policies and practices are not yet strong enough to ensure this transition is both fast and fair. Evidence shows failure to respect human rights can result in project delays, legal procedures and costs for renewable energy companies, underlying the urgency to strengthen human rights due diligence. We cannot afford to slow the critical transition to renewable energy with these kinds of impediments. As renewable energy investments expand in countries with weak human rights pro- tections, investors must step up their engagement to ensure projects respect human rights. Renewable energy has experienced a fourfold bioenergy and geothermal industries, increase in investment in the past decade. echoing findings from ourprevious analysis of Starting at $88 billion in 2005, new wind and hydropower companies. investments hit $349 billion in 2015.1 This eye-catching rise in investments is a welcome Alongside the moral imperative, companies trend and reflects international commitments can also avoid significant legal risks, project to combatting climate change and providing delays and financial costs by introducing access to energy in the Paris climate rigorous human rights due diligence policies agreement and the Sustainable Development and processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Directors’ Report
    Norwegian Investment Fund for Developing Countries 2019 ANNUAL REPORT DIRECTORS’ REPORT ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2019 2019 was a good year for Norfund. We created substantial positive development effects and achieved a solid financial result. A large number of new investment agreements were signed, with a commitment level that will result in a historically high contribution to the development of sustainable enterprises in developing countries. We revised our strategy to provide a basis for Norfund as a forward- looking and vigorous development actor. 1. NORFUND AND ITS MANDATE Norfund’s objectives and investment areas make a direct and Norfund was established by the Storting (Norwegian parlia- quantifiable contribution to the achievement of the UN sus- ment) in 1997 for the purpose of contributing to economic tainable development goals – especially the goals of eradicating growth and development in poor countries by investing in poverty, achieving sustainable economic growth, gender equal- viable enterprises. Norfund receives capital contributions ity, access to energy, industry, innovation and infrastructure from the Norwegian government amounting in 2019 to NOK and climate action. We measure these annually, and the results 1 905 million. Norfund was additionally allocated NOK 105 are included in our Report on Operations for 2019. million for a new project development and risk management facility and NOK 25 million for its grant scheme. As of 31 In order to make the best possible use of investment capital, December 2019, Norfund’s committed portfolio amounted an increasing share of Norfund’s investment takes the form of to NOK 24.9 billion. joint ventures with partners (investment platforms).
    [Show full text]
  • NORWEGIAN INVESTMENT FUND for DEVELOPING COUNTRIES Norfund Report on Operations 2015 THIS IS NORFUND
    2015 NORWEGIAN INVESTMENT FUND FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES Norfund Report on Operations 2015 THIS IS NORFUND Head office Norfund – the Norwegian Investment Fund for Developing Oslo Norway Countries – was established in 1997 by the Norwegian Parliament. The purpose is to contribute to building sustainable commercial Visiting address: businesses in developing countries. Støperigata 2, Aker Brygge, 0250 Oslo, Norway The key importance of the private sector for creating economic growth and combating poverty is highlighted in the sustainable development goals adopted by the UN in September 2015. A Postal address: profit able private sector with capacity for growth, which generates PO Box 1280 Vika. revenue and creates good workplaces, is essential for attaining the No-0111 Oslo, Norway goal of ending extreme poverty by 2030. Norfund is a state-owned company with limited liability, an Phone: instrument for Public Private Partnerships, and the government’s +47 22 01 93 93 main instrument for combatting poverty through private sector development. The fund’s activities are conducted in accordance Fax: with the principles of Norway’s development cooperation policy. Funding is provided via capital allocations from Norway’s budget +47 22 01 93 94 for development assistance. Norfund and similar investment funds in other countries are known as Development Finance E-mail: Institutions (DFIs). [email protected] Norfund provides equity, other risk capital, and loans to companies Internet: in selected countries and sectors in which businesses lack access to sufficient capital to develop and grow. Our priority investment www.norfund.no regions are Southern Africa and East Africa, and we have offices in Johannesburg, Maputo, and Nairobi.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020 ANNUAL REPORT 2020 Year 2020 / Letter from the CEO
    Annual report 2020 ANNUAL REPORT 2020 Year 2020 / Letter from the CEO Letter from the CEO "We grow people - people grow flowers". Marginpar Kariki farm in Kenya. (Photo: Sala Lewis) In March 2020, the East African flower producer Marginpar lost all business overnight. The COVID crisis had led to the collapse of both the Amsterdam flower market and the air freight out of Africa, so flowers could neither be sold nor exported. With 3,000 employees and no one to buy its flowers, Marginpar was in a crisis. The management of Marginpar and Norfund as investor faced an exceptionally difficult situation. The company was adamant that laying off its employees to face an uncertain future in the midst of a crisis was not an option. Instead, all employees voluntarily took a 50% pay cut and Norfund stepped in with an emergency loan to keep people employed and the company going. Six months later, the flower demand picked up and people came back to work with 100% pay and compensation for the 50% pay reduction that they had contributed with. PG. 1 OF 247 ANNUAL REPORT 2020 Year 2020 / Letter from the CEO Investing for impact - responsibly The Marginpar-story above is one example of the challenging and often unpredictable situations we face in Norfund. Another is when we invest in areas of conflict such as Somalia, South Sudan or Myanmar. We have been investing in Myanmar to create jobs and improve lives in a country with immense development needs. This is especially true now in the wake of the coup of early 2021 and COVID, which the UNDP estimates could plunge almost half of Myanmar’s population into poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping Good Companies • •
    Keeping Good Companies • • A NORWEGIAN ARTISAN ELITE MAKING A LIVELIHOOD Keith Postler The London School of Economics and Political Science PhD (Management) London, 2010 UMI Number: U6157B2 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615732 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 TUt^C5 f British Library of Political and Economic Science Declaration The work presented in this thesis is my own. Keith Postler, 23rd September 2010 Copyright Notice The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the author’s prior written consent. Abstract The thesis examines the establishment of an original business model and the institutions which enable and perpetuate it. An alliance of elite Norwegian artisan builders and interior designers develops the model in catering to a market of bespoke manufacture for Norway’s elite. The thesis argues that the originality of the model derives from the artisans’ creative use and adaptation of institutions in the Norwegian Welfare State and its business and local environment, forming a distinctive entrepreneurial lifestyle that results in a thriving network of companies and in the achievement of‘the good life’.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL ELECTIONS in NORWAY 9Th September 2013
    GENERAL ELECTIONS IN NORWAY 9th September 2013 European Elections monitor The rightwing wins the general elections in Norway The rightwing forces won the general elections that took place in Norway on 9th September. The Corinne Deloy Conservative Party (H) chaired by former Local Affairs and Regional Development Minister (2001- Translated by Helen Levy 2005), Erna Solberg won 26.8% of the vote and 48 seats (+ 18 in comparison with the previous elections on 14th September 2009). The Progress Party (FrP) a populist party led by Siv Jensen won 16.4% of the vote and 29 seats (-12). The Christian Democratic Party (KrF), led by Knut Arild Hareide won 5.6% of the vote and 10 seats (=); the Liberal Party (V) chaired by Trine Skei Grande Results won 5% of the vote and 9 seats (+ 7). Together the rightwing won 54% of the vote and 96 of the 169 seats in the Storting the only cham- ber of parliament. The Labour Party (DNA), led by outgoing Prime Minis- ment coalition chaired by Childcare, Equality and Social ter Jens Stoltenberg who can be pleased at having Integration Minister Audun Lysbakken won 4.1% of the retained its position as the country’s leading party won vote and 7 seats (-4). 30.8% of the vote and 55 seats (-9). The Centre Party The last seat went to the Green Party (MDG) which (Sp), a member of the outgoing government coalition, won 2.8% of the vote. led by Local Affairs Minister Liv Signe Navarsete won Turnout totalled 71.4% i.e. -5 points in comparison 5.5% of the vote and 10 seats (-1) and the Socialist with the general election that took place on 14th Sep- Left Party (SV) also a member of the outgoing govern- tember 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfund Report on Operations 2016 Norfund Report on Operations 2016 3 Message from the Managing Director Message from the Managing Director
    Norwegian­Investment­Fund­for­Developing­Countries 2016 CONTENTS CONTENTS 20 years of investing for development 3 Message from the Chief Executive Officer 4 Development trends 1997–2017 6 20 YEARS OF A brief history of Norfund 8 Organisation 13 Board of directors 14 INVESTING FOR DEVELOPMENT Norfund – an active, strategic, 08 minority investor 16 Strategic partnerships and investment IN 1997, NORFUND – the Norwegian Investment Fund for Developing The fund’s investments have contributed directly to the development platforms 25 Countries – was established by the Norwegian Parliament. The purpose of sustain able businesses, job generation, tax­payments and to increased was to contribute to building sustainable commercial businesses in access to clean energy, risk capital and financial services in poor countries. Investing in underserved markets 26 developing countries. With Norfund, a new chapter was added to the Today, 770 companies with more than 276,000 employees are included 37 Why go beyond aid and concessional Norwegian develop ment assistance policy; profitable industry and the Norfund portfolio. commerce was seen as a backbone of sustainable poverty alleviation. borrowing 28 Norfund’s activities are based on the principles of Norway’s develop­ Portfolio and results 30 Norfund’s mandate is to be additional and catalytic. This means that ment cooperation policy. The graph below shows how Norfund through Norfund shall provide additional capital to poor countries beyond what good returns and annual capital allocations from Norway’s budget for Portfolio 32 would happen in the market place, and attract additional capital from development assistance has grown to be a significant investor in our 25 Results 34 private sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Gjør Endringer Til Fremskritt
    Sannsynligvis ������������������������ ������������������������������� Norges beste ���������������������� CRM-system ������������������������ 815 48 333 – www.vegasmb.no �������������������������������������� Bedre å være kunde – enklere å være deg ��������������� ������������ A-AVIS Nelson Mandela 1. JULI 2005 NR. 25 – 18. ÅRGANG – LØSSALG KR 25 LEDERE LÆR Å TA FERIE! SIDE 30-31 SOM KAN Egil FORANDRE Janne «Drillo» SIDE 26-27 Carlsson Olsen Marit Breivik FOTO: LISE ÅSERUD/SCANPIX FOTO: JANERIK HENRIKSSON, CORNELIUS POPPE, TERJE BRINGEDAL OG ANNA ZIEMINSKI/SCANPIX TOPPSJEFEN FOTO: DAG HÅKONHELLEVIK DAG FOTO: Ohene Aboagye tar det med fatning. Klassens Noen får sjokk når de ser sjefen SIDE 36 EINAR CORNELIUSFOTO: POPPE/SCANPIX HØGETVEIT: beste i Roper ikke «ulv, ulv!» SIDE 21 ledelse Bærekraftig Utdanningsminister Kristin Clemet blir turistprosjekt vurdert som en bedre leder SIDE 20 enn Gro Harlem Brundt- land i Ukeavisen Ledelses serie LEDERFOKUS «Toppsjefen». «Vi imiterer forbilder SIDE 28-29 eBay-gründeren: enten vi er klar over – Det oser vilje, gjennomfør- det eller ikke.» ingskraft og taktisk klokskap av Kristin Clemet, skriver redaktør Vil gi tilbake til SIDE 34 Magne Lerø i sin kommentar. samfunnetSIDE 28-29 FOTO: CORNELIUSFOTO: POPPE/SCANPIX You need an advantage Gjør endringer You need AGRESSO til fremskritt ... For mer informasjon: nå! Tlf. 22 58 85 00 [email protected] Business Information Systems www.agresso.no 2 NR. 25 – FREDAG 1. JULI 2005 – UKEAVISEN LEDELSE Sjekket e-post ETIKK4I forbindelse med smøreskan- dalen i Vinmonopolet lot ledelsen de ansattes e-post bli sjekket. Et data- fi rma ble i løpet av to netter i februar SISTE UKE TERJE FOTO: BENDIKSBY/SCANPIX satt til å kopiere alle disker, e-postser- vere og fi lservere.
    [Show full text]
  • Test-Based Accountability in the Norwegian Context: Exploring Drivers, Expectations and Strategies
    Journal of Education Policy ISSN: 0268-0939 (Print) 1464-5106 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tedp20 Test-based accountability in the Norwegian context: exploring drivers, expectations and strategies Marjolein K. Camphuijsen, Jorunn Møller & Guri Skedsmo To cite this article: Marjolein K. Camphuijsen, Jorunn Møller & Guri Skedsmo (2020): Test-based accountability in the Norwegian context: exploring drivers, expectations and strategies, Journal of Education Policy, DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2020.1739337 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1739337 Published online: 11 Mar 2020. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tedp20 JOURNAL OF EDUCATION POLICY https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1739337 Test-based accountability in the Norwegian context: exploring drivers, expectations and strategies Marjolein K. Camphuijsen a, Jorunn Møller b and Guri Skedsmo b,c aDepartment of Sociology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; bDepartment of Teacher Education and School Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; cInstitute for Research on Professions and Professional Learning, Schwyz University of Teacher Education, Goldau, Switzerland ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY This paper investigates how and why test-based accountability (TBA), Received 16 May 2019 a global model for education reform, began to dominate educational Accepted 2 March 2020 debates in Norway in the early 2000s, and how this policy has been KEYWORDS operationalised and institutionalised over time. In examining the adop- Globalisation; education tion and retention of TBA in Norway, we build on the cultural political policy; standardised testing; economy framework, in combination with a political sociology-driven test-based accountability; approach to policy instruments.
    [Show full text]
  • Stein Kuhnle Professor of Comparative Politics University of Bergen Status: February 2011
    June 25, 2021 Curriculum Vitae Stein Kuhnle Professor of Comparative Politics University of Bergen Status: February 2011 PERSONAL DATA Birth: Bergen, Norway, 22 November 1947. Citizenship: Norwegian. Private address: Boenesskogen 205, N-5154 Boenes, Norway Mobile phone: +47 92492279 Email address: [email protected] EDUCATION Cand. polit. Degree in Comparative Politics, University of Bergen, Norway, 1973. Dissertation: "Social Mobilization and Political Participation: The Nordic Countries c. 1850-1970". ACADEMIC POSITIONS Professor of Comparative Politics, University of Bergen (August 1982 – November 2017); Emeritus Professor, University of Bergen (December 2017 – lifetime); Professor of Comparative Social Policy, Hertie School, The University of Governance, Berlin (Jan. 2006 – Dec.2013); Emeritus Professor, Hertie School, The University of Governance, Berlin (January 2014- lifetime); Adjunct Professor, Stein Rokkan Centre, Bergen (January 2002 - December 2005) ; Adjunct Professor, Centre for Social Research, Bergen (May 1999 - December 2001); Research Director, Program on Welfare State Research, Norwegian Research Council for Applied Social Sciences (January 1988 - December 1994) ; Professor, Gastprofessur "Westeuropa", University of Mannheim (March - August 1987); Associate Professor of Sociology, University of Bergen (January 1979 - July 1982); University Fellow, University of Bergen (January 1976-December 1978); Research Assistant, University of Bergen (1972-1975) VISITING FELLOWSHIPS Visiting Professor, Soka University, Tokyo, 1
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 1330 Møte Onsdag Den 12. Januar Kl. 10 President: Inge
    1330 12. jan. – Ordinær spørretime 2005 Møte onsdag den 12. januar kl. 10 «Gjennom media har det fremkommet at det er plan- lagt å legge ned de meteorologiske stasjonene på Jan President: Inge Lønning Mayen og Hopen på Svalbard. Mener utdannings- og forskningsministeren dette er Dagsorden (nr. 36): klokt med tanke på bl.a. håndhevelsen av den 200 mils 1. Spørretime fiskerigrensen og Norges ansvar for klimaforskning?» – ordinær spørretime (nr. 8) 2. Referat Statsråd Kristin Clemet [10:04:21]: Spørsmålet fra representanten Konglevoll ble opprinnelig stilt til uten- riksministeren. Grunnen til at jeg besvarer spørsmålet, er Sak nr. 1 at Meteorologisk institutt forvaltes av Utdannings- og Spørretime forskningsdepartementet. Bakgrunnen for medieoppsla- – ordinær spørretime gene som representanten viser til, er et forslag Meteoro- logisk institutt fremmet overfor eget styre nå i høst. For- Presidenten: Det blir noen endringer i den oppsatte slaget gikk ut på å nedlegge virksomheten på Jan Mayen spørsmålslisten, og presidenten viser i den sammenheng og Hopen i 2005. Instituttet har begrunnet dette forslaget til den oversikt som er omdelt på representantenes plasser med frykt for at infrastrukturen på Jan Mayen vil forsvin- i salen. ne når Loran C legges ned ved utgangen av inneværende De foreslåtte endringer i dagens spørretime foreslås år. Denne infrastrukturen er en forutsetning for Meteoro- godkjent. – Det anses vedtatt. logisk institutts virksomhet på øya. Meteorologisk institutt har nå trukket forslaget, og in- Endringene var som følger: stituttets styre har vedtatt å opprettholde virksomheten på Spørsmål 1, fra representanten Vidar Bjørnstad til Jan Mayen og Hopen i 2005. Hovedgrunnen til dette er statsministeren, er trukket tilbake.
    [Show full text]
  • Svalbard Innmat
    International Conference on Climate Change Research in the Arctic – Future Challenges Svalbard, 25 – 27 July 2003 Conference statement by the Science Commitee Stensbergg. 26 Box 2700 St. Hanshaugen N–0131 OSLO ISBN 82-12-01869-5 In addition to a broad European representration from the leading research groups and institutions in the field of Climate Change, accompanied by research representatives from Asia and North-America, there were high-level political representation from Norway, EU and USA. From the left: The Norwegian Minister for Research and Education, Kristin Clemet, Executive Director Kathie Olsen from the Office of Science and Technology Policy, White House, USA and the EU Commissioner, Philippe Busquin, European Commission. (Photo: Mona Gravningen Rygh) Cover photo: The glacier front (Nordenskiöldbreen in Billefjorden), The picture was taken during one of the conference field trips. International Conference on Climate Change Research in the Arctic – Challenges for Science and Research Policy Svalbard, 25 – 27 July 2003 Conference statement and recommendations by the Science Committee © Research Council of Norway 2003 Research Council of Norway Box 2700 St. Hanshaugen N–0131 Oslo Phone : 22 03 70 00 Fax: 22 03 70 01 This publication can be ordered via the Internet from: http://www.forskningsradet.no/bibliotek/publikasjonsdatabase/ or via the toll free fax number: 800 83 001 This report can be downloaded from http://www.forskningsradet.no/bibliotek/publikasjonsdatabase/ E-mail: [email protected] Home page : http://www.forskningsradet.no/ Graphic design cover: Creuna as Photo credits for cover photo: Mona Gravningen Rygh Cover printed by: Allkopi Impression: 900 copies Oslo, November 2003 ISBN 82-12-01869-5 (print) ISBN 82-12-01870-9 (pdf) It was an honour to host the International Conference on Climate Change in the Arctic organised on Svalbard this summer.
    [Show full text]